Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Psychiatry, 27 August 2024
Sec. Public Mental Health
Volume 15 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1464977

Corrigendum: Expert opinions on improving coercion data collection across Europe: a concept mapping study

This article is a correction to:

  1. Expert opinions on improving coercion data collection across Europe: a concept mapping study

    1. Read original article
Jakub Lickiewicz*Jakub Lickiewicz1*Simone Agnes EfkemannSimone Agnes Efkemann2Tonje Lossius HusumTonje Lossius Husum3Tella Lantta,Tella Lantta4,5Luca Pingani,Luca Pingani6,7Richard Whittington,Richard Whittington8,9
  • 1Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
  • 2LWL University Hospital Bochum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
  • 3Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
  • 4Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
  • 5Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • 6Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
  • 7Dipartimento ad Attività Integrata di Salute Mentale e Dipendenze Patologiche, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
  • 8Centre for Research and Education in Security, Prison and Forensic Psychiatry, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
  • 9Institute of Mental Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway

A Corrigendum on
Expert opinions on improving coercion data collection across Europe: a concept mapping study

By Lickiewicz J, Efkemann SA, Husum TL, Lantta T, Pingani L and Whittington R (2024). Front. Psychiatry 15:1403094. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1403094

In the published article, there was an error in the Acknowledgements section. This section previously stated:

“We thank our participants for their participation in our study.”

The corrected sentence appears below:

“This article is based upon work from COST Action FOSTREN, CA19133, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology, www.cost.eu). We thank our participants for their participation in our study.”

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: coercion, mapping methodology, mental health, coercion reduction, health policies

Citation: Lickiewicz J, Efkemann SA, Husum TL, Lantta T, Pingani L and Whittington R (2024) Corrigendum: Expert opinions on improving coercion data collection across Europe: a concept mapping study. Front. Psychiatry 15:1464977. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1464977

Received: 15 July 2024; Accepted: 06 August 2024;
Published: 27 August 2024.

Approved by:

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Copyright © 2024 Lickiewicz, Efkemann, Husum, Lantta, Pingani and Whittington. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jakub Lickiewicz, jlickiewicz@cm-uj.krakow.pl

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.