Luis Hualparuca-Olivera
Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez2
Julio Torales
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
- 1Escuela de Psicología, Universidad Continental, Huancayo, Peru
- 2Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru
- 3Department of Medical Psychology, School of Medical Sciences, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay
- 4Department of Research, Psychological Science, Uncanny, Huancayo, Peru
A Corrigendum on
Convergence between the dimensional PD models of ICD-11 and DSM-5: a meta-analytic approach
By Hualparuca-Olivera L, Caycho-Rodríguez T, Torales J and Ramos-Campos D (2023) Front. Psychiatry. 14:1325583. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1325583
In the published article, there was an error in Table 1, 7. Damovsky et al. (35), Column 6. Two incorrect r coefficients were mentioned. Instead of “0.14” and “0.00”, they should be “0.70” and “0.74”, respectively.
In the published article, there was an error in Figure 1. The figure showed incorrect correlation indices for ‘Damovsky et al. (2022), PiCD_DT <-> PID-5-BF+_DT’ and for ‘Damovsky et al. (2022), PiCD_DL <-> PID-5-BF+_ANT’. Instead of “0.14” and “0.00”, it should be “0.70” and “0.74”, respectively.
The correct Figure 1 appears below.
Figure 1
Figure 1 .
In the published article, there was an error in Supplementary Figure S3. The figure showed incorrect correlation indices for ‘Damovsky et al. (2022), PiCD_DT <-> PID-5-BF+_DT’ and for ‘Damovsky et al. (2022), PiCD_DL <-> PID-5-BF+_ANT’. Instead of “0.14” and “0.00”, it should be “0.70” and “0.74”, respectively.
In the published article, there was an error in 3 Results, 3.1 Description of the chosen studies, Paragraph 2. This sentence previously stated:
“The range of the correlation coefficients r was from 0.31 to 0.74 between the severity measures of both models; and r from 0 to 0.89, between the trait scales of both models.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“The range of the correlation coefficients r was from 0.31 to 0.74 between the severity measures of both models; and r from 0.26 to 0.89, between the trait scales of both models.”
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: ICD-11, DSM-5, personality disorder, dimensional models, severity, traits, convergent validity, meta-analysis
Citation: Hualparuca-Olivera L, Caycho-Rodríguez T, Torales J and Ramos-Campos D (2024) Corrigendum: Convergence between the dimensional PD models of ICD-11 and DSM-5: a meta-analytic approach. Front. Psychiatry 15:1366574. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1366574
Received: 06 January 2024; Accepted: 11 March 2024;
Published: 21 March 2024.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Stefan Borgwardt, University of Lübeck, GermanyCopyright © 2024 Hualparuca-Olivera, Caycho-Rodríguez, Torales and Ramos-Campos. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Luis Hualparuca-Olivera, bGh1YWxwYXJ1Y2FAY29udGluZW50YWwuZWR1LnBl