Célia Vicente
Sónia Fernandes
Ana Romão2,3
Júlio Belo Fernandes- 1Department of Nursing, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal
- 2Nurs Lab, Caparica, Almada, Portugal
- 3Egas Moniz Center for Interdisciplinary Research (CiiEM), Egas Moniz School of Health & Science, Caparica, Almada, Portugal
An outcome of dementia is a progressive decline in cognitive function. Implementing psychotherapies and psychosocial interventions is crucial for bolstering cognitive abilities, promoting independence, and elevating the quality of life for individuals with dementia. This review aims to identify current trends in psychotherapies and psychosocial interventions for people with dementia. A Scoping review was developed based on the framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley. The literature search was conducted on electronic databases, including Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Nursing & Allied Health Collection, and MedicLatina. Executed in June 2023, the search focused on articles published in English, Portuguese, and Spanish between 2013 and 2023. Through this search, 1409 articles were initially identified. After selecting and analyzing the reports, sixteen trials were included in this review. Eight distinct categories were identified, covering different strategies. These categories run from computerized game-based cognitive training and reminiscence therapy to compensatory and restorative strategies, memory and attention training, calculation training, dual-task training, counseling, and personalized goal attainment. The findings of this scoping review highlight the diverse landscape of psychotherapies and psychosocial interventions for people with dementia.
1 Introduction
In the past fifty years, socioeconomic development has been accompanied by significant declines in fertility rates and a simultaneous exponential increase in life expectancy. Consequently, there has been a global phenomenon of population aging (1), with several challenges associated with this aging population (2, 3), including dementia (4).
Dementia is a health challenge characterized by a decline in cognitive function, affecting memory, thinking, orientation, comprehension, calculation, learning capacity, language, and judgment. It is a progressive condition primarily affecting older individuals, leading to significant impairment in daily functioning and quality of life (5, 6). As the global population ages, the prevalence of dementia in Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries is estimated to increase from over 21 million to approximately 42 million individuals in 2050 (7).
As the disease progresses, people with dementia depend on a carer to fulfill their basic needs, resulting in an increased caregiver burden (8). In addition, the behavioral and psychological symptoms associated with dementia, such as depression, agitation, and aggression, entail additional difficulties for caregivers and healthcare professionals (8–10).
Caregiving for someone with dementia can be overwhelming, leading to burnout and decreased quality of life (8, 10, 11). The burden of dementia has significant economic implications, with healthcare costs and productivity losses associated with the condition expected to continue to rise (12, 13).
Considering the profound repercussions of dementia, there is an urgent need to create efficient interventions targeting both impairment and participation restriction in individuals suffering from this condition.
The American Psychiatric Association categorizes psychotherapies and psychosocial treatments for dementia into four distinct approaches: (1) behavior-oriented approaches (e.g., behavior therapy), (2) emotion-oriented approaches (e.g., supportive therapy, reminiscence), (3) cognition-oriented approaches (e.g., skills training, reality orientation), and (4) stimulation-oriented approaches (e.g., exercise, art therapy, music therapy, psychomotor therapy) (14).
Although these interventions cannot change the course of the disease, they can support patients to compensate for cognitive deficits and maximize their remaining abilities, addressing both impairment and participation restriction (15).
Combined methods, including both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments, have shown significant promise in improving functionality for individuals with dementia. These comprehensive strategies have the potential to slow the progression of the disease, helping individuals maintain their abilities and engage in meaningful activities for a more extended period (16).
Studies by Bahar‐Fuchs et al. (17), Li et al. (18), and Orgeta et al. (19) have all demonstrated the effectiveness of cognitive interventions in enhancing memory, attention, executive function, and problem-solving skills, resulting in overall improvements in cognitive performance and quality of life.
Additionally, these interventions can provide valuable strategies for caregivers to manage challenging behaviors and enhance communication with individuals living with dementia (20, 21).
Identifying psychotherapies and psychosocial interventions for people with dementia is of utmost importance. It allows health professionals to stay updated with the latest advancements and ensure that interventions are evidence-based. In addition, health professionals and researchers can build upon existing knowledge and refine their approaches to better address the specific needs of people with dementia. Therefore, this review aims to identify current trends in psychotherapies and psychosocial interventions for individuals with dementia.
2 Methods
This scoping review was drawn based on the framework outlined by Arksey and O’Malley (22) and subsequently expanded upon by Levac et al. (23). In addition, we adhered to the checklist provided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) (24).
2.1 Search methods
The research question that guides the review is: What are the current trends in psychotherapies and psychosocial interventions for individuals with dementia?
We developed a search strategy to uncover pertinent literature based on the ‘Population–Concept–Context (PCC)’ mnemonic. The PCC served as the basis for determining the criteria for inclusion and exclusion (Table 1).
Table 1 Eligibility criteria.
Publications from 2013 to 2023 were identified in a comprehensive electronic search via Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Nursing & Allied Health Collection, and MedicLatina.
We incorporated Medical Subject Heading terms. The following combinations of search terms were used: [(Dementia OR Alzheimer disease) AND (Cognitive training OR Cognitive therapies OR Cognition therapy) AND (Rehabilitation)].
The final search was done on June 16, 2023.
2.2 Study selection
Duplicated identification was identified, individually reviewed, and removed by CV using Rayyan - AI-Powered Tool for Systematic Literature Reviews. The same researcher performed the screening of manuscript titles to determine potential relevance. CV and SF performed the abstract screening independently, after which they reviewed full-text articles concerning the eligibility criteria. Any discrepancies were settled via discussion and consensus between the reviewers and the involvement of a senior reviewer (JBF) if required.
2.3 Data extraction
A data extraction form was developed and used by CV and JBF to collect relevant data from the included studies. For each review, the following data were extracted: study characteristics (e.g., authors, publication year, study design, aim) and intervention details (e.g., type of intervention, duration, frequency, and length).
2.4 Data synthesis and analysis
The extracted data were analyzed to identify the current trends in psychotherapies and psychosocial interventions for individuals with dementia. The characteristics and key findings of the included studies were summarized. Based on the guidelines proposed by Braun et al. (25), we conducted a data-driven thematic analysis to identify interventions used in people with dementia. Patterns and consistencies in the reported outcomes across the studies were explored. No statistical analysis or meta-analyses were possible due to significant heterogeneity observed among the included studies, including variations in intervention types, timing of sessions, and settings. Therefore, the findings were extracted and reported systematically.
3 Results
After a comprehensive search in multiple databases, we initially identified 1409 studies. After the duplicate removal, 1108 studies remained, of which 1089 were excluded based on titles and abstracts. Ultimately, 19 publications were read in full text, and 16 studies that met the eligibility criteria were included in this review. Figure 1 illustrates the selection process.
Figure 1 PRISMA flow chart for study selection.
The 16 randomized controlled trials were published between 2013 and 2023. Out of the 16 trials, there were six conducted in Europe (26–31), two in Japan (32, 33), two in China (34, 35), two in Republic of Korea (36, 37), one in the United States (38), one in Australia (39), one in Mexico (40), and one in Turkey (41).
A list of included randomized controlled trials is shown in Table 2.
Table 2 Data extraction and synthesis.
Data analysis unveiled a range of psychotherapies and psychosocial interventions for people with dementia. These rehabilitation interventions have been categorized into eight distinct categories.
3.1 Computerized game-based cognitive training
Several studies have explored the effectiveness of computerized game-based cognitive training in enhancing cognitive function in individuals with varying degrees of cognitive impairment (30, 31, 34, 36, 41). While these studies share the approach of using computerized games to stimulate cognitive abilities, they differ in terms of methodology, intervention strategies, and outcomes.
A study by Han et al. (36) introduced a spaced retrieval-based memory training program using an iPad tablet. Participants were tasked with memorizing and immediately recalling words displayed on the screen. This self-administered approach showed promise in mitigating cognitive decline in individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Similarly, Law et al. (34) employed computerized games within a supervised group setting led by an occupational therapist. The training encompassed multiple cognitive functions and demonstrated improvements over eight weeks.
Manenti et al. (30) took a more immersive approach and utilized a virtual reality rehabilitation system to train skills such as memory, spatial orientation, and executive functions. In contrast, Torpil et al. (41) explored using commercially available games with the Microsoft Kinect for virtual reality-based intervention, highlighting the potential benefits even from entertainment-based games.
Van Balkom et al. (31) introduced an adaptive online cognitive training program based on the ‘Braingymmer’ platform. It targeted attention, processing speed, and executive functions, adjusting its difficulty according to each participant’s performance. Meanwhile, Lemke et al. (29) employed dual-task training through computerized game-based motor-cognitive training on an interactive balance platform alongside a motor learning exercise program focusing on compensatory sit-to-stand maneuvers. Each study provided valuable insights into the benefits of computerized game-based cognitive training, with variations in platforms, delivery methods, and emphasis on specific cognitive skills.
3.2 Reminiscence therapy
Nakamura et al. (32) and Amieva et al. (26) employed group-based reminiscence therapy to enhance cognitive engagement and well-being. Nakamura et al. (32) facilitated discussions among participants centered on daily or seasonal events from their youth, fostering a collective exploration of past experiences. This approach was complemented by integrating visual aids, including pictures and relevant items, to deepen sensory connections and enrich the reminiscence therapy experience.
Similarly, Amieva et al. adopted a group-based approach but introduced a structured program for reminiscence therapy. Their tailored program focused on diverse personal themes, spanning schooldays, birthdays, weddings, working life, and holidays. By delving into these distinct life themes, participants were guided to evoke memories associated with specific events, potentially enhancing cognitive engagement through an organized and targeted strategy.
3.3 Compensatory and restorative strategies
Greenaway et al. (38) introduced a compact Memory Support System featuring a two-page per day calendar and a note-taking system tailored to conveniently fit within a man’s breast pocket or a woman’s purse. This system was devised to offer a practical means of organizing and retaining daily information, enhancing memory recall and daily functioning.
Conversely, Hindle et al. (27) took a broader approach by incorporating strategies to manage cognitive difficulties, practical situations, and anxiety symptoms. These strategies encompassed the utilization of compensatory tools such as calendars, diaries, and reminders. Additionally, they incorporated restorative techniques like mnemonic devices and spaced retrieval to bolster the retention of new information and improve recall.
3.4 Memory and attention training
Peng et al. (35) explored Memory and Attention Training using diverse techniques. Their strategy encompassed a Seven-piece board recovery training to challenge and enhance memory recall. They also employed activities like picture-reading memory exercises and phrase recitation. Additionally, they targeted attention development through color reaction training and Schulte Grid exercises.
Taking a unique perspective on Memory Training, Kim (37) introduced an innovative dementia partner program. This one-on-one approach was facilitated via telephone and focused on engaging participants in discussions about news, sharing daily routines, and planning for upcoming days or weeks.
In addition to these studies, Juárez-Cedillo et al. (40) contributed a multi-component cognitive stimulation program encompassing cognitive aspects like paying attention and maintaining orientation.
3.5 Calculation training
Peng et al. (35) employed a Calculation Training strategy involving two straightforward questions and one simple application question for calculation within each intervention session.
Similarly, Amieva et al. (26) developed a program designed to engage various cognitive functions and activities of daily life. Their approach included Calculation Training through tasks such as money counting to improve domestic financial handling.
Kim (37) introduced a distinctive dementia partner program that utilized telephone interactions. This program featured tailored cognition items, including calculation checking for specific weekdays, counting numbers in reverse, related word listing games, and pair word telling.
3.6 Dual-task training
Shimada et al. (33) utilized Dual-Task Training by combining aerobic exercise, muscle strength training, and postural balance retraining with cognitive tasks.
As previously mentioned, Lemke et al. (29) also incorporated Dual-Task Training. However, their approach involved computerized game-based motor-cognitive training on an interactive balance platform.
3.7 Counseling
In the context of counseling interventions, several studies have employed distinct strategies to address various aspects of health and well-being.
Shimada et al. (33) implemented a counseling approach in which instructors educated participants on aging, nutrition, oral care, frailty, and urinary incontinence. The participants also received informative pamphlets on these subjects throughout the study period.
Kim (37) utilized telephone counseling, covering a range of items, including physical self-monitoring, stress intervention, health promotion, mental self-monitoring, nutrition and diet, social competence, challenges in the community, and monitoring physical and mental changes. This comprehensive approach aimed to provide holistic guidance to individuals.
Juárez-Cedillo et al. (40) employed counseling to foster personal interaction, boost self-esteem, and enhance personal security. Their approach aimed to address psychological and emotional well-being, further enriching the scope of counseling interventions.
Clare et al. (28) employed counseling to assist participants in defining and achieving up to three rehabilitation goals through a problem-solving approach. They also addressed emotional and motivational challenges by applying emotion regulation and behavioral activation strategies as necessary.
3.8 Personalized goal attainment
Hindle et al. (27) introduced a Goal-Oriented Cognitive Rehabilitation program. This intervention embraced evidence-based techniques to guide participants in pursuing agreed-upon goals. The program was structured to align with each participant’s objectives, promoting a targeted and personalized approach to cognitive enhancement.
Clare et al. (28) similarly assisted patients in defining rehabilitation goals using a problem-solving approach. Regan et al. (39) offered a personalized intervention called MAXCOG, which honed in on individually significant goals. This approach involved learning names at social events, enhancing medication adherence, and boosting memory for specific activities. Both interventions were tailored to everyone, recognizing and addressing their cognitive needs and challenges.
4 Discussion
The review evaluated various interventions targeting cognitive enhancement and rehabilitation across multiple categories. A substantial body of literature has examined the effects of computerized game-based cognitive training interventions (30, 31, 34, 36, 41). These studies contribute to understanding the versatility of computerized game-based cognitive training interventions. The consistent findings across these studies suggest that technology-driven interventions can engage participants while targeting a range of cognitive functions. The successful integration of technology into cognitive rehabilitation strategies opens avenues for more personalized, engaging, and adaptable interventions tailored to diverse populations, from mild cognitive impairment to stroke survivors.
Nakamura et al. (32) and Amieva et al. (26) provided insight into the use of reminiscence therapy. Group-based reminiscence therapy, supported by visual aids and tailored themes, emerged as a valuable approach for engaging individuals in recalling and sharing past experiences. This therapy promotes memory recall and offers potential benefits for emotional well-being and social interaction.
Studies by Peng et al. (35), Juárez-Cedillo et al. (40), and Kim (37) highlighted the versatility of memory training interventions. Approaches varied from seven-piece board recovery training, tailored tasks at different difficulty levels, to unique dementia partner programs via telephone. These interventions emphasize the potential to enhance memory through various techniques, ranging from challenging exercises to personalized interactions.
Lemke et al. (29) and Shimada et al. (33) have explored integrating motor and cognitive therapy in dual-task training interventions. This method combines physical exercises with cognitive tasks, showing a synergistic effect that enhances motor-cognitive integration and overall performance. Lemke et al. (29) study offers a fresh perspective by incorporating technology into dual-task training. While combining motor and cognitive tasks is not new, their use of interactive balance platforms and computerized game-based exercises introduces innovation. This technological integration enhances the approach’s complexity and engagement, boosting its potential for motor-cognitive integration and functional outcomes.
The overarching benefit of combined motor and cognitive therapy lies in its potential to reflect the complex cognitive demands of everyday life (42–44). This approach aligns with emerging theories of brain plasticity, suggesting that the brain’s adaptability can be harnessed through integrated interventions (45, 46). As cognitive and motor functions intertwine in real-life scenarios, targeting both domains simultaneously in therapy may lead to more efficient and comprehensive improvements in overall functionality.
The review also highlighted compensatory and restorative strategies. Compensatory strategies, supported by Greenaway et al. (38) and Hindle et al. (27), offer practical solutions by using external aids to navigate cognitive challenges. Memory support systems, calendars, and reminders assist in organizing thoughts and managing tasks. In contrast, as emphasized by Hindle et al. (27), restorative strategies aim to enhance cognitive function through targeted training and interventions. Cognitive exercises, problem-solving techniques, and memory training work to regain lost cognitive abilities and enhance cognitive reserves.
Training executive functions in individuals with dementia through interventions like Memory and Attention Training and Calculation Training is profoundly significant, improving their quality of life and potentially slowing symptom progression. These functions include planning, decision-making, organization, problem-solving, and emotional control. Impairments in these areas are characteristic of dementia and significantly affect daily life and independence (47, 48).
Beyond direct enhancements in memory, attention, and logical thinking, these training methods offer broader benefits, including increased social engagement, heightened self-esteem, and reduced emotional stress. However, customization to individual needs, considering disease stage, personal preferences, and cognitive capacities, is crucial. Hindle et al. (27), Clare et al. (28), and Regan et al. (39) underscored tailored interventions focusing on individual goals, aligning cognitive rehabilitation with personally meaningful objectives to enhance motivation and outcomes.
The review’s findings highlight diverse interventions, emphasizing the absence of a universal approach to enhance cognitive function and participation restriction. In the broader context, a comprehensive strategy is crucial to meet the diverse needs of those with cognitive impairments and participation restriction.
No single intervention is a panacea. Instead, cognitive rehabilitation emerges from the synergy of various interventions, addressing specific cognitive challenges. By embracing various strategies, a holistic program can be designed to accommodate each patient’s unique strengths and weaknesses.
Ultimately, a well-rounded rehabilitation program for people with dementia acknowledges the multifaceted nature of cognitive impairments. By offering personalized interventions, professionals can optimize benefits for individuals, empowering them to enhance cognitive abilities, regain independence, and elevate overall quality of life.
4.1 Challenges and considerations
While psychotherapies and psychosocial interventions show promise, challenges must be addressed to ensure their effectiveness and widespread implementation. One challenge is the diverse nature of dementia, requiring tailored interventions to suit individual cognitive profiles and symptom severity (3, 49, 50).
Although many studies demonstrate short-term positive effects (15, 17, 51), maintaining cognitive improvements over extended periods remains a concern, necessitating longer follow-up studies. In addition, translating cognitive gains from interventions to real-world situations poses another challenge, requiring ecologically valid training programs (52).
Advancing technology brings new tools for cognitive rehabilitation, potentially revolutionizing the field with engaging, personalized, and accessible interventions (53). Implementation, however, demands multifaceted considerations.
For users, accessibility and usability are paramount, especially for individuals with varying tech familiarity or cognitive impairments. User-friendly, intuitive technology tailored to cognitive abilities preserves user dignity and autonomy, enhancing engagement.
Healthcare professionals play a crucial role, requiring effective technology training. Access to progress tracking ensures effective implementation, necessitating seamless technology integration into healthcare systems.
Economically, evaluating the cost-effectiveness of technology-based interventions is vital. Balancing upfront costs with long-term benefits like improved cognition and enhanced quality of life guides resource allocation.
Ensuring affordability and equity for individuals, families, and healthcare systems is vital, making technology-based interventions accessible regardless of socioeconomic status.
4.2 Strengths and limitations
This review’s key strength lies in its focus on experimental studies, allowing for a precise exploration of current trends in psychotherapies and psychosocial interventions for individuals with dementia. This review offers valuable insights into promising cognitive training and rehabilitation approaches by explicitly pinpointing interventions subjected to rigorous experimental scrutiny. The comprehensive overview of these interventions facilitates a deep comprehension of the techniques and methodologies employed, simplifying their replication in other settings.
Nevertheless, certain limitations do exist in this research. Not all studies provide exhaustive descriptions of interventions, potentially hindering their replication by other professionals. By exclusively focusing on experimental studies, there is a risk of overlooking valuable insights from non-experimental studies, which could enrich the overall comprehension of cognitive training and rehabilitation interventions. Additionally, limiting the search to Scopus and EBSCOhost research platforms might have excluded pertinent studies from alternative sources. Furthermore, specific criteria, such as excluding non-English, Portuguese, and Spanish papers, could introduce biases by omitting relevant literature. Finally, by following the framework outlined by Arksey and O’Malley, this scoping review does not include the assessment of study quality as a component of the scoping process. Recognizing these limitations is crucial to maintaining a balanced interpretation of the findings and encouraging further research that transcends this review’s scope.
5 Conclusion
This review facilitated the synthesis of evidence on psychotherapies and psychosocial interventions for individuals with dementia and captured current trends encompassing various approaches, ranging from computerized game-based cognitive training and reminiscence therapy to compensatory and restorative strategies, memory and attention training, calculation training, dual-task training, counseling, and personalized goal attainment.
Dementia poses a significant global health challenge with far-reaching consequences for individuals, families, and society. Cognitive training and rehabilitation interventions are vital in enhancing cognitive functioning, independence, and quality of life for individuals with dementia. Continued research, innovation, and collaboration across disciplines are necessary to develop and refine interventions that can make a meaningful difference in the lives of individuals with dementia.
Data availability statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Requests to access these datasets should be directed to juliobelo01@gmail.com.
Author contributions
CV: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SF: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AR: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JF: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank FCT/MCTES for the financial support to CiiEM (UIDB/04585/2020) through national funds.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. World of Health Organization. Intersectoral global action plan on epilepsy and other neurological disorders (2021). Available at: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/defaultsource/brain-health/first-draft-action.plan-on-epilepsy.and.other-neurological-disorders_180621_en.pdf?sfvrsn=16474e26_24&download.
2. Bloom DE, Canning D, Lubet A. Global population aging: facts, challenges, solutions & Perspectives. Daedalus (2015) 144(2):80–92. doi: 10.1162/DAED_a_00332
3. Fernandes JB, Ramos C, Domingos J, Castro C, Simões A, Bernardes C, et al. Addressing ageism-be active in aging: study protocol. J Pers Med (2022) 12(3):354. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030354
4. Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, Vaupel JW. Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet (London England) (2009) 374(9696):1196–208. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61460-4
5. Duong S, Patel T, Chang F. Dementia: What pharmacists need to know. Can Pharm J (2017) 150(2):118–29. doi: 10.1177/1715163517690745
6. World of Health Organization. Dementia – Key facts (2023). Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dementia.
7. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Health at a glance 2021: OECD indicators. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Publishing (2021). doi: 10.1787/ae3016b9-en
8. Seidel D, Thyrian JR. Burden of caring for people with dementia - comparing family caregivers and professional caregivers. A descriptive study. J Multidiscip Healthc (2019) 12:655–63. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S209106
9. Rathnayake S, Jones C, Calleja P, Moyle W. Family carers’ perspectives of managing activities of daily living and use of mHealth applications in dementia care: A qualitative study. J Clin Nurs (2019) 28(23-24):4460–70. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15030
10. Lindt N, van Berkel J, Mulder BC. Determinants of overburdening among informal carers: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr (2020) 20(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01708-3
11. Alves LCS, Monteiro DQ, Bento SR, Hayashi VD, Pelegrini LNC, Vale FAC. Burnout syndrome in informal caregivers of older adults with dementia: A systematic review. Dementia Neuropsychol (2019) 13(4):415–21. doi: 10.1590/1980-57642018dn13-040008
12. GBD 2016 Dementia Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol (2019) 18(1):88–106. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30403-4
13. Cantarero-Prieto D, Leon PL, Blazquez-Fernandez C, Juan PS, Cobo CS. The economic cost of dementia: A systematic review. Dementia (2020) 19(8):2637–57. doi: 10.1177/1471301219837776
14. American Psychiatric Association Work Group on Alzheimer’s Disease and other Dementias, Rabins PV, Blacker D, Rovner BW, Rummans T, Schneider LS, et al. American Psychiatric Association practice guideline for the treatment of patients with Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. Second edition. Am J Psychiatry (2007) 164(12 Suppl):5–56.
15. Kudlicka A, Martyr A, Bahar-Fuchs A, Woods B, Clare L. Cognitive rehabilitation for people with mild to moderate dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2019) 2019(8):CD013388. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013388
16. Gupta A, Prakash NB, Sannyasi G. Rehabilitation in dementia. Indian J Psychol Med (2021) 43(5 Suppl):S37–47. doi: 10.1177/02537176211033316
17. Bahar-Fuchs A, Martyr A, Goh AMY, Sabates J, Clare L. Cognitive training for people with mild to moderate dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2018) 2018(7):CD013069. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013069
18. Li X, Ji M, Zhang H, Liu Z, Chai Y, Cheng Q, et al. Non-drug therapies for alzheimer’s disease: A review. Neurol Ther (2023) 12(1):39–72. doi: 10.1007/s40120-022-00416-x
19. Orgeta V, McDonald KR, Poliakoff E, Hindle JV, Clare L, Leroi I. Cognitive training interventions for dementia and mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2020) 2(2):CD011961. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011961.pub2
20. Cheng ST, Au A, Losada A, Thompson LW, Gallagher-Thompson D. Psychological interventions for dementia caregivers: what we have achieved, what we have learned. Curr Psychiatry Rep (2019) 21(7):59. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1045-9
21. Garcia-Ptacek S, Dahlrup B, Edlund AK, Wijk H, Eriksdotter M. The caregiving phenomenon and caregiver participation in dementia. Scand J Caring Sci (2019) 33(2):255–65. doi: 10.1111/scs.12627
22. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol (2005) 8(1):19–32. doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616
23. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation science: IS (2010) 5:69. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
24. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-scR): checklist and explanation. Ann Internal Med (2018) 169(7):467–73. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850
25. Braun V, Clarke V, Hayfield N, Terry G. Handbook of research methods in health social sciences. Singapore: Springer (2019).
26. Amieva H, Robert PH, Grandoulier AS, Meillon C, De Rotrou J, Andrieu S, et al. Group and individual cognitive therapies in Alzheimer’s disease: the ETNA3 randomized trial. Int Psychogeriatr (2016) 28(5):707–17. doi: 10.1017/S1041610215001830
27. Hindle JV, Watermeyer TJ, Roberts J, Brand A, Hoare Z, Martyr A, et al. Goal-orientated cognitive rehabilitation for dementias associated with Parkinson’s disease-A pilot randomised controlled trial. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry (2018) 33(5):718–28. doi: 10.1002/gps.4845
28. Clare L, Kudlicka A, Oyebode JR, Jones RW, Bayer A, Leroi I, et al. Individual goal-oriented cognitive rehabilitation to improve everyday functioning for people with early-stage dementia: A multicentre randomised controlled trial (the GREAT trial). Int J Geriatr Psychiatry (2019) 34(5):709–21. doi: 10.1002/gps.5076
29. Lemke NC, Werner C, Wiloth S, Oster P, Bauer JM, Hauer K. Transferability and sustainability of motor-cognitive dual-task training in patients with dementia: A randomized controlled trial. Gerontology (2019) 65(1):68–83. doi: 10.1159/000490852
30. Manenti R, Gobbi E, Baglio F, Macis A, Ferrari C, Pagnoni I, et al. Effectiveness of an innovative cognitive treatment and telerehabilitation on subjects with mild cognitive impairment: A multicenter, randomized, active-controlled study. Front Aging Neurosci (2020) 12:585988. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.585988
31. van Balkom TD, Berendse HW, van der Werf YD, Twisk JWR, Peeters CFW, Hoogendoorn AW, et al. Effect of eight-week online cognitive training in Parkinson’s disease: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Parkinsonism Relat Disord (2022) 96:80–7. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2022.02.018
32. Nakamura K, Kasai M, Nakai M, Nakatsuka M, Meguro K. The group reminiscence approach can increase self-awareness of memory deficits and evoke a life review in people with mild cognitive impairment: the kurihara project data. J Am Med Directors Assoc (2016) 17(6):501–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.11.009
33. Shimada H, Makizako H, Doi T, Park H, Tsutsumimoto K, Verghese J, et al. Effects of combined physical and cognitive exercises on cognition and mobility in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A randomized clinical trial. J Am Med Directors Assoc (2018) 19(7):584–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.09.019
34. Law LLF, Mok VCT, Yau MMK. Effects of functional tasks exercise on cognitive functions of older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Alzheimer’s Res Ther (2019) 11(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13195-019-0548-2
35. Peng Z, Jiang H, Wang X, Huang K, Zuo Y, Wu X, et al. The efficacy of cognitive training for elderly chinese individuals with mild cognitive impairment. BioMed Res Int (2019) 2019:4347281. doi: 10.1155/2019/4347281
36. Han JW, Son KL, Byun HJ, Ko JW, Kim K, Hong JW, et al. Efficacy of the Ubiquitous Spaced Retrieval-based Memory Advancement and Rehabilitation Training (USMART) program among patients with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled crossover trial. Alzheimer’s Res Ther (2017) 9(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13195-017-0264-8
37. Kim H. The effects of dementia partner programs using telephone on cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms in elderly persons with mild cognitive impairment: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Innovative Technol Exploring Eng (2019) 8(3C):126–31.
38. Greenaway MC, Duncan NL, Smith GE. The memory support system for mild cognitive impairment: randomized trial of a cognitive rehabilitation intervention. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry (2013) 28(4):402–9. doi: 10.1002/gps.3838
39. Regan B, Wells Y, Farrow M, O’Halloran P, Workman B. MAXCOG-maximizing cognition: A randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of goal-oriented cognitive rehabilitation for people with mild cognitive impairment and early alzheimer disease. Am J geriatric psychiatry: Off J Am Assoc Geriatric Psychiatry (2017) 25(3):258–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2016.11.008
40. Juárez-Cedillo T, Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez L, Sánchez-Hurtado LA, Martínez-Rodríguez N, Juarez-Cedillo E. Randomized controlled trial of multi-component cognitive stimulation therapy (SADEM) in community-dwelling demented adults. J Alzheimer’s Dis (2020) 78(3):1033–45. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200574
41. Torpil B, Şahin S, Pekçetin S, Uyanık M. The effectiveness of a virtual reality-based intervention on cognitive functions in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Games Health J (2021) 10(2):109–14. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2020.0086
42. Strobach T. The dual-task practice advantage: Empirical evidence and cognitive mechanisms. Psychonomic Bull Rev (2020) 27(1):3–14. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01619-4
43. de Barros GM, Melo F, Domingos J, Oliveira R, Silva L, Fernandes JB, et al. The effects of different types of dual tasking on balance in healthy older adults. J Pers Med (2021) 11(9):933. doi: 10.3390/jpm11090933
44. Domingos J, Dean J, Fernandes JB, Godinho C. Professionals’ Self-reported difficulties towards integrating dual task training in care for people with parkinson’s disease. Int J Environ Res Public Health (2022) 19(3):1281. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031281
45. Cramer SC, Sur M, Dobkin BH, O’Brien C, Sanger TD, Trojanowski JQ, et al. Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications. Brain (2011) 134(Pt 6):1591–609. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr039
46. Voss P, Thomas ME, Cisneros-Franco JM, de Villers-Sidani É. Dynamic brains and the changing rules of neuroplasticity: implications for learning and recovery. Front Psychol (2017) 8:1657. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01657
47. Cipriani G, Danti S, Picchi L, Nuti A, Fiorino MD. Daily functioning and dementia. Dementia Neuropsychol (2020) 14(2):93–102. doi: 10.1590/1980-57642020dn14-020001
48. Perach R, Rusted J, Harris PR, Miles E, DETERMIND team. Emotion regulation and decision-making in persons with dementia: A scoping review. Dementia (2021) 20(5):1832–54. doi: 10.1177/1471301220971630
49. Rodriguez Then FS, Jackson J, Ware C, Churchyard R, Hanseeuw B, International Interdisciplinary Young Investigators Alzheimer’s & Dementia. Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary perspectives: on the road to a holistic approach to dementia prevention and care. J Alzheimer’s Dis Rep (2020) 4(1):39–48. doi: 10.3233/ADR-180070
50. Fernandes JB, Teixeira F, Godinho C. Personalized care and treatment compliance in chronic conditions. J Pers Med (2022) 12(5):737. doi: 10.3390/jpm12050737
51. Yamasaki T. Preventive strategies for cognitive decline and dementia: benefits of aerobic physical activity, especially open-skill exercise. Brain Sci (2023) 13(3):521. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13030521
52. Deenik J, Czosnek L, Teasdale SB, Stubbs B, Firth J, Schuch FB, et al. From impact factors to real impact: translating evidence on lifestyle interventions into routine mental health care. Trans Behav Med (2020) 10(4):1070–3. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz067
53. Irazoki E, Contreras-Somoza LM, Toribio-Guzmán JM, Jenaro-Río C, van der Roest H, Franco-Martín MA. Technologies for cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation for people with mild cognitive impairment and dementia. A systematic review. Front Psychol (2020) 11:648. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00648
Keywords: dementia, Alzheimer disease, cognitive therapies, cognition therapy, rehabilitation
Citation: Vicente C, Fernandes S, Romão A and Fernandes JB (2024) Current trends in psychotherapies and psychosocial interventions for people with dementia: a scoping review of randomized controlled trials. Front. Psychiatry 15:1286475. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1286475
Received: 31 August 2023; Accepted: 09 January 2024;
Published: 22 January 2024.
Edited by:
Myrra Vernooij-Dassen, Radboud University Medical Centre, NetherlandsReviewed by:
Renata Kochhann, Moinhos de Vento Hospital, BrazilLuis Manuel Mota de Sousa, Universidade Atlântica, Portugal
Copyright © 2024 Vicente, Fernandes, Romão and Fernandes. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Júlio Belo Fernandes, juliobelo01@gmail.com