This article is a correction to:
Dreading Yet Hoping: Traumatic Loss Impacted by Reference DNA Sample Collection for Families of Missing People
Sarah Wayland1*
Jodie Ward2,3- 1School of Medicine and Health, University of New England, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- 2National DNA Program for Unidentified and Missing Persons, Australian Federal Police, Canberra, ACT, Australia
- 3Centre for Forensic Science, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
A Corrigendum on
Dreading Yet Hoping: Traumatic Loss Impacted by Reference DNA Sample Collection for Families of Missing People
by Wayland, S., and Ward, J. (2022). Front. Psychiatry 13:866269. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.866269
In the original article, the reference for (9) “Grewcock M. Slipping through the net? Some thoughts on the Cornelia Rau and Vivian Alvarez inquiry. Curr Issues Crim Just. (2005) 17:284–90. doi: 10.1080/10345329.2005.12036355” was included but not referenced. It has been removed from the reference list.
In the original article, the reference for (26) “Ward J. Best practice recommendations for the establishment of a national DNA identification program for missing persons: a global perspective. Forensic Sci Int: Genet Suppl Ser. (2017) 6:e43-e45. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigss.2017.09.009” was included but not referenced. It has been removed from the reference list.
In the original article, the reference for (36) “Isuru A, Hewage SN, Bandumithra P, Williams SS. Unconfirmed death as a predictor of psychological morbidity in family members of disappeared persons. Psychol Med. (2019) 49:2764–71. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718003793” was included but not referenced. It has been removed from the reference list.
In the original article, reference (3), “Ward J. The past, present and future state of missing persons investigations in Australia. Aus J For Sci. (2018) 50:708–22. doi: 10.1080/00450618.2018.1466535” was not cited in the article. The citation has now been inserted in Section Introduction, Paragraph one:
“The expectation is that some of these unknown remains will be linked to known missing persons, who in some cases have been absent for decades (3).”
In the original article, reference (10), “President's DNA Initiative. Identifying Victims Using DNA: A Guide for Families. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice (2005). Available online at: https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/identifying-victims-using-dna-guide-families-guia-para-las-familias” was not cited in the article. The citation has now been inserted in Section Introduction, paragraph two:
“Additionally, there are recently published international guidelines for police and forensic investigators regarding the use of DNA for humanitarian and mass disaster operations (7–9), and publicly available information brochures [e.g., (10)] and online resources (e.g., https://www.missingpersons.gov.au/support/national-dna-program-unidentified-and-missing-persons) for families to aid their understanding of the use of DNA for identifying human remains.”
In the original article, reference (25), “Gin K, Tovar J, Bartelink EJ, Kendell A, Milligan C, Willey P, et al. The 2018 California wildfires: integration of rapid DNA to dramatically accelerate victim identification. J For Sci. (2020) 65:791–9. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14284” was not cited in the article. The citation has now been inserted in Introduction, Paragraph six:
“Unlike DNA identification of disaster victims, which are typically identified rapidly due to the high profile and public nature of the event, community expectations and provision of adequate resources, DNA identification may take an extended period of time for routine missing persons cases (25).”
The references have been renumbered as a result of other reference updates.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The updated reference list appears below. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Bricknell L, Renshaw L. Missing persons in Australia, 2008–2015. In: Statistical Bulletin 01. (2016). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
2. Australian Federal Police. AFP DNA Program to Help Identify Unknown Missing Australians. Canberra (2021). Available online at: https://www.afp.gov.au/news-media/media-releases/afp-dna-program-help-identify-unknown-and-missing-australians
3. Ward J. The past, present and future state of missing persons investigations in Australia. Aus J For Sci. (2018) 50:708–22. doi: 10.1080/00450618.2018.1466535
4. Wright K, Mundorff A, Chaseling J, Forrest A, Maguire C, Crane DI. “A new disaster victim identification management strategy targeting “near identification-threshold” cases: experiences from the Boxing Day tsunami.” Forensic Sci Int. (2015) 250:91–7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.03.007
5. Hartman D, Drummer O, Eckhoff C, Scheffer JW, Stringer P. The contribution of DNA to the disaster victim identification (DVI) effort. Forensic Sci Int. (2011) 205:52–8. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.09.024
6. INTERPOL. Disaster victim identification guide. Annexure 6: Phase 3: Ante- Mortem. Lyon: INTERPOL (2018).
7. Goodwin WH. The use of forensic DNA analysis in humanitarian forensic action: the development of a set of international standards. Forensic Sci Int. (2017) 278:221–7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.07.002
8. Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science. Best practices recommendations for DNA analysis for human identification in mass fatality incidents. (2018). Available at: https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2018/02/13/best_practices_recommendations_for_dna_analysis_for_human_identification_in_mass_fatality_incidents.pdf
9. Interpol. Best Practice Principles: Recommendations on the Use of DNA for the Identification of Missing Persons and Unidentified Human Remains (2015).
10. President's DNA Initiative. Identifying Victims Using DNA: A Guide for Families. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice (2005). Available online at: https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/identifying-victims-using-dna-guide-families-guia-para-las-familias
11. Boss P. Ambiguous loss in families of the missing. Lancet. (2002) 360:s39–40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11815-0
12. Boss P. Ambiguous Loss: Learning to Live with Unresolved Grief . (1999). USA: Harvard University Press.
13. Wayland S, Maple M, McKay K, Glassock G. Holding on to hope: a review of the literature exploring missing persons, hope and ambiguous loss. Death Stud. (2016) 40:54–60. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2015.1068245
14. Wayland S. I Still Hope but What I Hope for now has Changed: A Narrative Inquiry Study of Hope and Ambiguous Loss when Someone is Missing. (PhD thesis), Armidale: University of New England. (2015).
15. Boss P. The Trauma and Complicated Grief of Ambiguous Loss. Pastoral Psychol. (2010) 59:137–45. doi: 10.1007/s11089-009-0264-0
16. Jones KT, Zagacki KS, Lewis TV. Communication, liminality, and hope: the September 11th missing person posters. Commun Stud. (2007) 58:105–21. doi: 10.1080/10510970601168780
17. Lenferink LIM, Eisma MC, de Keijser J, Boelen PA. Grief rumination mediates the association between self-compassion and psychopathology in relatives of missing persons. Eur J Psychotraumatol. (2017) 8:6. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1378052
18. Wayland S, Maple M. ‘An all-consuming cumulonimbus of pain': a scoping review exploring the impact of ambiguous loss when someone is missing and the counselling interventions relevant to the experience. Bereavement Care. (2020) 39:21–9. doi: 10.1080/02682621.2020.1728089
19. Parker LS, London AJ, Aronson JD. Incidental findings in the use of DNA to identify human remains: an ethical assessment. Forensic Sci Int: Genetics. (2013) 7:221–9. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.10.002
20. Doka K. Disenfranchised Grief: New Directions, Challenges and Strategies for Practice. Champaign, IL: Research Press. (2002).
21. Suero K. Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo: Breakthrough DNA Advances in the Fight for Human Rights. Latin Americanist. (2018) 62:525–44. doi: 10.1111/tla.12213
22. Puig P, Barceló A, Lahoz R, Niubó À, Jiménez J, Soler-López M, et al. Genetic identification of a war-evacuated child in search of his own identity for more than seventy years. Forensic Sci Int. (2019) 298:312–5. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.03.014
23. ICRC. DNA Analysis and Identification of Human Remains: A Guide to Best Practice in Armed Conflicts and Other Situations of Armed Violence. (2009).
24. Salado Puerto M, Abboud D, Baraybar JP, Carracedo A, Fonseca S, Goodwin W, et al. The search process: Integrating the investigation and identification of missing and unidentified persons. Forensic Sci Int: Synergy. (2021) 3:100154. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100154
25. Gin K, Tovar J, Bartelink EJ, Kendell A, Milligan C, Willey P, et al. The 2018 California wildfires: integration of rapid DNA to dramatically accelerate victim identification. J For Sci. (2020) 65:791–9. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14284
26. National Missing Persons Coordination Centre. The SOS guide: Missing Persons, Australian Federal Police. Canberra Australia.
27. Foy S. Profile of Missing Persons in New South Wales. (2004). (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW, Australia.
28. Braun V, Victoria C. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual Res Psychol. (2020) 1–25. doi: 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
29. Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport. Exer Health. (2019) 11:589–97. doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
31. Azungah T. Qualitative research: deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis. Qual Res J. (2018) 18:383–400. doi: 10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00035
32. Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice, 9th edition. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins (2018).
33. Melnick J, Roos S. The myth of closure. Gestalt Rev. (2007) 11:90–107. doi: 10.5325/gestaltreview.11.2.0090
34. Dartnall S, Jane G-D, Judith G. An opportunity to be heard: family experiences of coronial investigations into missing people and views on best practice. Front Psychol. (2019) 10:2322. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02322
35. Wayland S, Cook O, Cartwright A, Ryan J, Brondolo E, Bassed R, Bugeja L. The nature and impact of occupational trauma exposure among staff working in a forensic medical and scientific service: a qualitative interview study. Aust J For Sci. (2021) 1–12. doi: 10.1080/00450618.2021.2002409
36. Otlowski MFA. ALRC Report, Essentially Yours: The Protection of Human Genetic Information in Australia: Implications for Regulation of Parentage Testing. Aust J Family Law. (2003) 17:84–90. ISSN 0817-623X.
37. Katsanis SH, Snyder L, Arnholt K, Mundorff AZ. Consent process for US-based family reference DNA samples. Forensic Sci Int: Genet. (2018) 32:71–9. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.10.011
38. Baig K, Reham Mohamed A-LT, Sonia C. “I'm hoping they're an ethical company that won't do anything that I'll regret” Users Perceptions of At-home DNA Testing Companies. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (2020). p. 1–13. doi: 10.1145/3313831.3376800
Keywords: missing persons, DNA sample, traumatic loss, unresolved grief, ambiguous loss, unidentified human remains
Citation: Wayland S and Ward J (2022) Corrigendum: Dreading Yet Hoping: Traumatic Loss Impacted by Reference DNA Sample Collection for Families of Missing People. Front. Psychiatry 13:940169. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.940169
Received: 10 May 2022; Accepted: 03 June 2022;
Published: 19 August 2022.
Edited and reviewed by: Lonneke I. M. Lenferink, University of Twente, Netherlands
Copyright © 2022 Wayland and Ward. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sarah Wayland, c3dheWxhbjImI3gwMDA0MDt1bmUuZWR1LmF1