Mental Health in Australia: Psychological Distress Reported in Six Consecutive Cross-Sectional National Surveys From 2001 to 2018
- 1Southern Synergy, Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- 2Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- 3Monash Business School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- 4Department of Occupational Therapy, Monash University Peninsula Campus, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- 5School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Victoria, VIC, Australia
- 6Brain and Mind Centre, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- 7Mental Health at Work, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- 8Centre for Mental Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- 9Monash Health, Dandenong, VIC, Australia
A Corrigendum on
Mental Health in Australia: Psychological Distress Reported in Six Consecutive Cross-Sectional National Surveys From 2001 to 2018
by Enticott, J., Dawadi, S., Shawyer, F., Inder, B., Fossey, E., Teede, H., Rosenberg, S., Ozols AM, I., and Meadows, G. (2022). Front. Psychiatry 13:815904. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.815904
In the original article, there was an error. Unfortunately, some important text in the discussion was misplaced.
A correction has been made to Discussion, “Changes Vary Between Subgroups,” paragraph one:
The original text, “Very-high distress in women aged 55–64 has doubled this century (from 3.5 to 7.2%) and combined high/very-high distress has increased by 50% (12.4–18.7%), both of which are highly significant findings. Very-high distress also increased in males, significantly in those aged 25–34 years. Overall, distress was greatest in women aged 18–24 years during all years; 8.0% for very-high levels and 22.1% for combined high/very-high in 2017/18. (2.1–4.0%), but overall is a more tentative finding since a significant increase did not extend to the combined high/very-high distress metric (10.6–11.5%).” has been corrected to:
“Very-high distress in women aged 55–64 has doubled this century (from 3.5 to 7.2%) and combined high/very-high distress has increased by 50% (12.4–18.7%), both of which are highly significant findings. Very-high distress also increased in males, significantly in those aged 25–34 years, but this is a more tentative finding since a significant increase did not extend to the combined high/very high distress metric (10.6–11.5%). Overall, distress was greatest in women aged 18–24 years during all years; 8.0% for very-high levels and 22.1% for combined high/very-high in 2017/18 (2.1–4.0%).”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: psychological distress, mental health services, prevalence, population measures, mental health
Citation: Enticott J, Dawadi S, Shawyer F, Inder B, Fossey E, Teede H, Rosenberg S, Ozols AM I and Meadows G (2022) Corrigendum: Mental Health in Australia: Psychological Distress Reported in Six Consecutive Cross-Sectional National Surveys From 2001 to 2018. Front. Psychiatry 13:934065. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.934065
Received: 02 May 2022; Accepted: 16 May 2022;
Published: 27 June 2022.
Edited and reviewed by: Liye Zou, Shenzhen University, China
Copyright © 2022 Enticott, Dawadi, Shawyer, Inder, Fossey, Teede, Rosenberg, Ozols AM and Meadows. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Joanne Enticott, joanne.enticott@monash.edu; Graham Meadows, graham.meadows@monash.edu
†ORCID: Joanne Enticott orcid.org/0000-0002-4480-5690
Frances Shawyer orcid.org/0000-0002-2496-7094