Yunjun Hu
Xiaoyu Lan
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
- 1Department of Students’ Affairs, Wenzhou University of Technology, Wenzhou, China
- 2Promenta Research Center, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Using a dual person-centered approach, the current study examined the Dark Triad profiles and mental health profiles among a large-scale sample of high school students. The study also simultaneously examined whether the emerging Dark Triad profiles could diverge in mental health profiles, delineating a thorough, and person-centered view of this association. To achieve these research aims, 1,640 Chinese high school students (Mage = 16.78; SD = 0.68; 57.6% females) participated in this study, and they were uniformly instructed to complete a set of well-established questionnaires. Results from latent profile analyses revealed five Dark Triad profiles—low Machiavellianism-psychopathy (7.4%), benevolent (61.7%), highly malevolent (6.7%), low narcissism (8.8%), and malevolent (15.4%)—and the following four mental health profiles: flourishing (37.7%), vulnerable (16.4%), troubled (33.9%), and highly troubled (12.4%). Moreover, results from multiple multinomial regression analyses showed that, among all five empirically derived Dark Triad profiles, students with the low Machiavellianism-psychopathy profile exhibited the highest probability of being “flourishing,” whereas those with the low narcissism profile showed the highest likelihood of being “highly troubled.”
Introduction
During high school, students are increasingly exposed to a wide range of challenging circumstances and academic-related demands. For instance, students expect increased autonomy from their parents and should gradually navigate ever-more complicated peer dynamics (1, 2). Students in high school settings also often experience salient academic-related stress due to ongoing academic demands, which may precipitate the risk of mental illness (3). In accordance with these concerns, empirical studies have confirmed that psychological distress during this period of life could have long-term detrimental impacts on both physical and mental health later in adulthood (4, 5). Investigating the correlates of high school students’ mental health can therefore provide novel insights into evidence-based intervention or prevention programs to facilitate personal growth.
Nevertheless, the assumption that the population is homogeneous has often resulted in intervention or prevention programs being administered to youth populations without elaborative consideration of personal characteristics that differentiate the intervention processes. In the current study, we extended prior research by using a dual person-centered approach to investigate high school students’ mental health profiles and the Dark Triad profiles; our aim was to examine the associations between the profiles, delineating a thorough and person-centered view of the associations. Extending the literature in this field is not only theoretically relevant to a dual-factor model of mental health and the Dark Triad structure, but also practically informative when precisely locating vulnerable or at-risk students to potentially improve the efficiency of targeted intervention or prevention programs.
In what follows, we conduct a literature review concerning each study component (i.e., mental health and Dark Triad) and the associations between the components, starting with a review of research on youth mental health.
Youth Mental Health
Mental health is traditionally defined by the absence of psychopathology and associated levels of impaired functioning (6, 7). However, in recent decades, this narrow view has been challenged by the rising expansion of positive psychology (8) and increasing recognition that the absence of mental illness is not identical to the presence of positive mental health (9, 10). Distinct from this traditional view, a dual-factor model of mental health posits that individuals’ mental health should be regarded as a complete state of being, one in which negative (i.e., psychopathology) and positive (i.e., subjective wellbeing) mental health indicators are not extremes on a single continuum (11). Psychopathology encompasses both internalizing problems (e.g., depression and anxiety) and externalizing problems (e.g., aggressive behavior and rule-breaking behavior) (12, 13). Subjective wellbeing, on the other hand, entails three related yet separate constructs: life satisfaction (cognitive appraisal of one’s quality of life), positive affect (positive emotional experiences), and negative affect (negative emotional experiences) (14). Based on different combinations of psychopathology and subjective wellbeing, four mental health groups can be derived: (a) troubled (high psychopathology and low wellbeing), (b) flourishing (low psychopathology and high wellbeing), (c) symptomatic but content (high psychopathology and high wellbeing), and (d) vulnerable (low psychopathology and low wellbeing).
Many empirical studies have indicated the importance of considering psychopathology and subjective wellbeing in tandem, which aligns with a dual-factor model of mental health (15, 16). These studies indicate that, for sizable groups of individuals, psychopathology scores co-occur with subjective wellbeing values. Given this co-occurrence, researchers should simultaneously incorporate psychopathology and subjective wellbeing when investigating the correlates of youth mental health. Nevertheless, empirical studies relying on a dual-factor model of mental health have mostly employed predetermined cutoff scores to identify group membership. Such an approach relies on an arbitrarily assigned distance between groups and does not require additional external discriminant analyses to examine how different groups relate to indicators (17). To gain a more comprehensive understanding of youth mental health, we aimed to apply a person-centered approach that can unravel relatively homogeneous groups of adolescents with distinct configurations in terms of psychopathology and subjective wellbeing.
Further, although numerous studies on high school students’ mental health have been conducted, insufficient research has focused on the mental health of Chinese high school students, who often encounter considerable academic pressure deriving from the high-stakes National College Entrance Examination (18).
Study Context in China
Chinese students, especially high school ones, are generally overburdened by the pressures of maintaining high levels of academic excellence. Such pressures are the result of academic competence in East Asian societies being more strongly linked to family dignity, high social status, occupational competitiveness, and job wages than in many individualistic societies, such as North America (3, 19). Due to these cultural and societal emphases, Chinese parents tend to have extremely high expectations for children’s academic performance (3, 19). Chinese students often, due to those same emphases, respect their parents’ authority and are less likely to openly contradict parental expectations (20, 21). Under high parental expectations and salient academic pressure, Chinese students indeed show superior academic performance through diligence and perseverance but also exhibit higher levels of anxiety and emotional distress than their peers from individualistic societies (22).
In individualistic societies, students often view themselves as independent from others and focus on individual volition, making the students more likely to seek social support under academic and social pressures with little caution. The underlying cultural assumptions lead such students to believe they can proactively foster their own wellbeing and that others, based on their own willingness, are also free to assist (23, 24). By contrast, in Chinese society, individuals are socialized to hold a highly interdependent self-construal. Chinese individuals therefore tend to be highly sensitive to social cues and potentially more likely to feel social anxiety and emotional distress than individuals from individualistic societies, for instance, who often demonstrate a high independent self-construal (25, 26). Moreover, Chinese society heavily emphasizes establishing and maintaining the harmony of the social group. Given these prominent features of Chinese society, students are reluctant to explicitly ask for support from close others when encountering emotional distress and stressful life events; bringing personal difficulties to the attention of others within the social group can erode the harmony and improperly demand individuality (23, 27, 28). Additionally, Chinese students are less likely than their peers from individualistic societies to seek professional counseling services when encountering psychological distress; visiting a psychologist is highly stigmatized and considered a threat to the dignity of the whole family (29). Substantial empirical studies have documented that Chinese high school students exhibit a high prevalence of emotional distress (3–5, 18). Given the described cultural emphases, this line of research can be extended by focusing on the mental health of Chinese high school students.
In addition, to highlight intervention efforts in schools, the focus should be on the relatively stable traits, such as personality, that fundamentally impact youth mental health (30). Regarding personality traits, we focused on the Dark Triad in the current study, as discussed below.
Dark Triad
Dark Triad refers to the constellation of three conceptually distinct but empirically overlapping personality traits: Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy (31). Specifically, Machiavellianism refers to those who lack empathy toward others and tend to be deceptive and manipulative; narcissism involves those who are characterized by a grandiose self-view and an increased sense of entitlement; and psychopathy indicates those who are impulsive, self-centered, and emotionally cold and who tend to exhibit antisocial behaviors (31–33). Prior research has examined the role of benevolent and neutral personality traits in youth mental health within mainstream personality structures, such as the Big Five. Comparatively, fewer studies have focused on malevolent personality factors, such as the Dark Triad, in youth mental health (34). Prior research has, however, demonstrated that the Dark Triad incrementally predicts psychological outcomes above and beyond the Big Five (31, 35–37). This incremental value merits further research on Chinese youth populations, complementing the extant literature on the Dark Triad and enriching the disproportionate amount of the literature focused on the link between the Dark Triad and positive/negative psychological outcomes. In addition, examining the association between the Dark Triad and youth mental health is essential because high school students confront salient socioemotional changes and academic pressures, which could amplify malevolent traits (34). Götz et al. for instance, demonstrated that Machiavellianism peaked around age 16 (34). In this perspective, studying the Dark Triad in the context of high school students provides a critical contribution to the literature due to salient manifestations of socially aversive traits during this period of life.
To date, extensive studies have relied on a variable-centered approach to study the Dark Triad traits. This approach is informative and valuable, but ultimately fails to represent a broad spectrum of personalities based on their natural configurations. For instance, individuals may simultaneously possess more than one Dark Triad trait (36). Given this limitation, we aimed to utilize a person-centered approach to identify relatively homogeneous groups of youth with distinct configurations in terms of Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy. Applying such an approach regards the individual as a whole system and allows for exploring how the Dark Triad traits operate conjointly and within youth (38–40).
Among extant but limited literature on applying a person-centered approach to the Dark Triad, Nguyen et al. (38) found four Dark Triad profiles among a sample of French adults: benevolent (low scores on all three dimensions), high Machiavellianism (high scores on Machiavellianism but low scores on narcissism and psychopathy), high psychopathy (high scores on psychopathy but low scores on Machiavellianism and narcissism), and malevolent (high scores on all three dimensions) (38). Chabrol et al. (41) also reported four profiles based on the Dark Tetrad traits (the Dark Triad plus sadism) in French high school students: low-traits, sadistic-Machiavellian, psychopathic-narcissistic, and high-traits (41). In addition, Kam and Zhou (42) identified three Dark Triad profiles among Canadian undergraduate students: low, intermediate, and high levels of each trait (42). The findings from Kam and Zhou notably indicate that the Dark Triad is unidimensional, and they argued against applying a person-centered approach to study the Dark Triad. Similar results have been recently replicated by Garcia and MacDonald (43) in a sizable Western-based sample (43). Despite these tremendous strides, however, the mounting but limited literature on the Dark Triad and Tetrad profiles still exhibits conflicting evidence that requires further investigation.1 Moreover, these empirical studies center on adults from Western societies, restricting the generalization of research findings. Considering the developmental nature of youth and the unique cultural features in which youth are embedded, the literature can be meaningfully extended by exploring the Dark Triad profiles in youth from Eastern societies, such as China.
Association Between the Dark Triad and Youth Mental Health
In terms of the association between the Dark Triad and psychosocial indicators, a recent meta-analysis reported that Dark Triad traits are linked to adverse psychosocial indicators but not positive outcomes (30). More precisely, Machiavellianism, especially psychopathy, exhibits a stronger association with adverse psychosocial outcomes than narcissism. Muris et al. (30) found that psychopathy is the dominant malevolent trait, explaining unique variance in all psychosocial outcomes; by contrast, Machiavellianism and narcissism seemingly do not make independent contributions (30). In terms of Chinese adolescents, Li et al. (44) found that Machiavellianism and psychopathy are negatively linked to subjective wellbeing, while narcissism is positively related to subjective wellbeing (44). In terms of negative outcomes of mental health, Zhang et al. (45) showed that Machiavellianism and psychopathy are positively associated with loneliness, while narcissism is negatively related to loneliness (45). Similarly, findings from Geng et al. (46) and Geng et al. (47) also confirmed the negative association of Machiavellianism and psychopathy to internalizing and externalizing problems in Chinese adolescents (46, 47).
These findings notwithstanding, no empirical studies have investigated the Dark Triad profiles and then examined how differing Dark Triad profiles may simultaneously diverge in mental health profiles. Therefore, using a person-centered approach to identify the Dark Triad profiles and then investigate their associations with separated outcomes merely yields a limited view of this association.
The Present Research
To address the limitations in the existing literature, the current study aimed to apply a dual latent profile analysis to probe both mental health profiles (indexed by psychopathology and subjective wellbeing) and Dark Triad profiles (indexed by Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy) in a large-scale sample of Chinese high school students. We therefore empirically identified these profiles and then examined whether differing Dark Triad profiles diverge in mental health profiles. Specifically, the current study examined the following research questions (RQ):
RQ1: How many meaningful mental health profiles among Chinese high school students can be identified?
RQ2: How many meaningful Dark Triad profiles among Chinese high school students can be derived?
RQ3: Do differing Dark Triad profiles diverge with respect to mental health profiles among Chinese high school students?
Based on the current literature review, we generated specific hypotheses for each RQ. For RQ1, we expected four mental health profiles: troubled, flourishing, symptomatic but content, and vulnerable. For RQ2, we did not formulate a specific hypothesis due to inconsistent findings identified, but, according to the extant research, we expected to derive three or four profiles characterizing differing degrees of the three socially aversive traits. Concerning RQ3, we hypothesized that students within the profile characterized by low Machiavellianism and psychopathy but high narcissism are more likely to be the flourishing profile, whereas students within the profile characterized by high Machiavellianism and psychopathy but low narcissism are more likely to be the troubled profile. Notably, we statistically controlled for age, gender, and family socioeconomic status when addressing all RQs because prior research has suggested that these sociodemographic variables could not only influence mental health outcomes and the Dark Triad, but also impact the strength of the associations between the two (48–50).
Materials and Methods
Participants and Procedures
Before data collection, ethics approval was obtained from the principal investigator’s affiliation. We first contacted school principals and head teachers in public high schools, and explained the objectives of this research project. After getting their approval, we invited students to participate in this investigation voluntarily. Data were collected with the help of trained graduate students and head teachers in each classroom during a regular class hour. Confidentiality, anonymity, and participants’ rights were strictly guaranteed during all research processes. The final sample comprised 1,640 Chinese high school students (57.6% female; M age = 16.78; SD = 0.68). At the time of data collection, participants attended 10th (n = 918; 56%) and 11th (n = 722; 44%) grades in six public high schools in China.
Measures
Internalizing and Externalizing Problems
Internalizing and externalizing problems were assessed by the Chinese adaptation of the Youth Self-Report (YSR) (12, 51). The Chinese version of the YSR consists of 30 items and two dimensions: internalizing problems (15 items; e.g., “I am too fearful or anxious”) and externalizing problems (15 items; e.g., “I destroy my own things”). Students were asked to assess each item based on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (definitely does not apply to me) to 4 (definitely applies to me). Following previous research (51), the score was calculated by averaging all items separated by two dimensions. Higher scores indicated greater internalizing problems and externalizing problems, respectively. Previous studies have shown good internal consistency of the YSR in Chinese adolescents (29, 52). In this study, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.92 for internalizing problems and 0.89 for externalizing problems.
Subjective Wellbeing
Life satisfaction was assessed by the Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale (MSLSS) (53). The MSLSS contains 25 items and assesses five life domains (family, friends, school, living environment, and self). One of the item examples is, “I enjoy being at home with my family (on the family domain).” Participants were asked to rate each item on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (totally disagree) to 4 (totally agree). The average score of these items was calculated, with high values indicating higher levels of global life satisfaction. According to prior research (54), the MSLSS has demonstrated good internal consistency in Chinese adolescents. In this study, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.93.
Positive and negative affect were assessed using the 14-item Affect Balance Scale (ABS) developed by Bradburn (55). The ABS consists of two dimensions: positive affect (8 items; e.g., I am optimistic about the future) and negative affect (6 items; e.g., I feel so restless that I cannot sit long in a chair). Participants were asked to rate each item according to each experience’s frequency in their daily life on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (never) to 4 (always). The average score for each dimension was calculated, with a higher score indicating a higher level of a particular affect. Based on previous studies on Chinese adolescents (49, 56), this scale has exhibited good internal consistency. In this study, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.85 for positive affect and 0.79 for negative affect.
Dark Triad
The Dark Triad was measured by the Short Dark Triad scale (SD3) (33), which has been validated in the Chinese cultural context, showing good psychometric properties (57). The SD3 consists of 28 items with 10 items for Machiavellianism, 9 items for narcissism, and 9 items for psychopathy. Item examples are, “most people can be manipulated (Machiavellianism); I like to get acquainted with important people (narcissism); I like to get revenge on authorities (psychopathy).” Each item was rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Scores were established by averaging the values of all items, separated by each personality trait. A higher score indicated a greater tendency to each Dark Triad trait. Prior research has shown good internal consistency of the SD3 in Chinese youth (58). In this study, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.78 for Machiavellianism, 0.70 for narcissism, and 0.71 for psychopathy.
Sociodemographic Characteristics
Students were asked to report their age, gender, and family socioeconomic status. Family socioeconomic status was measured by parental educational level, parental occupational status, and family monthly income (58, 59). A composite standardized score was calculated, with high values indicating high levels of family socioeconomic status.
Data Analysis
We used SPSS 28.0 and Mplus 7.0 to analyze the data (60, 61). Prior to addressing research questions, we conducted descriptive statistics (means and standard deviations) and Pearson’s correlations to have an overview of study variables. Little’s missing completely at random (MCAR) test was adopted to evaluate the influence of missing data (62). The MCAR showed that the missing data for all study variables were randomly distributed. In this context, the remaining missing values were computed using full information maximum likelihood (63).
In terms of RQ1 and RQ2, we applied latent profile analyses to identify mental health profiles and the Dark Triad profiles, after controlling for students’ age, gender, and family socioeconomic status. To determine the optimal number of latent profiles, we employed the following fit indices: Akaike information criteria (AIC), Bayesian information criterion (BIC), adjusted BIC (BIC), Lo-Mendell-Rubin adjusted likelihood ratio test (LMR-LRT), bootstrapped likelihood ratio test (BLRT), and entropy (39, 64). For AIC, BIC, and aBIC, lower values indicate a better model fit. For the LMR-LRT and BLRT, they compare models for k and k-1 profiles. If these values exhibit significant p-values, it suggests that the k profile model is a better fit than the k-1 profile model. With regard to entropy, higher scores indicate fewer classification errors, and scores higher than 0.70 usually suggest that the latent profiles highly discriminate. Apart from these fit indices, we also took the proportion of the smallest profiles into account. For example, solutions with small numbers of participants (e.g., less than 5% of the total sample) should be avoided, as they are not meaningful and lack practical value (65). To examine whether emerging latent profiles significantly differed on the selected indicators, multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and the follow-up post-hoc test were conducted (40). Finally, z-scores of the observable indicators were calculated to aid the interpretation of the latent profile solution.
Regarding RQ3, we applied a multinomial logistic regression using maximum likelihood estimation to determine whether differing Dark Triad profiles may diverge in mental health profiles, after controlling for students’ age, gender, and family socioeconomic status.
Results
Descriptive Statistics and Correlations
Descriptive statistics and correlations for study variables are presented in Table 1. Machiavellianism and psychopathy were positively associated with negative indicators of mental health (i.e., internalizing problems, externalizing problems, and negative affect) and negatively linked to positive indicators of mental health (i.e., life satisfaction and positive affect); by contrast, narcissism was negatively related to these negative indicators (except for externalizing problems), and positively linked to positive indicators.
TABLE 1
Table 1. Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations of study variables for Chinese high school students.
Identifying Mental Health Profiles
Table 2 shows the goodness of fit indices for mental health profiles. As shown in Table 2, the likelihood ratio statistical tests were significant for the two-, three-, and four-profile solutions. Compared to the two- and three-profile solutions, the four-profile solution exhibited lower AIC, BIC, and aBIC, as well as an acceptable value of the entropy. Therefore, the four-profile solution was regarded as the optimal model in this study.
TABLE 2
Table 2. The goodness of fit indices for mental health profiles.
Further, Table 3 provides a summary of the means and standard deviations of each selected indicator across these four mental health profiles, as well as the F-values, partial eta-squared values, and post hoc comparisons of these profiles. The results of MANOVA and post-hoc tests showed statistically significant differences in all five indicators between profiles (see Table 3).
TABLE 3
Table 3. Mean differences in study indicators across four mental health profiles.
We referred to the dual-factor model of mental health (11) and z-scores of the observable indicators to interpret these profiles (see Figure 1). Specifically, students in the first profile (n = 611; 37.7%) reported the lowest scores on negative indicators (i.e., internalizing and externalizing problems, negative affect) and the highest scores on positive indicators (i.e., life satisfaction and positive affect); thus, this profile was labeled as “flourishing.” Students in the second profile (n = 270; 16.4%) scored low on all indicators; hence, this profile was marked as “vulnerable.” Students in the third profile (n = 556; 33.9%) reported high scores on negative indicators and low scores on positive indicators; therefore, this profile was named “troubled.” Students in the fourth profile (n = 203; 12.4%) were characterized by the highest scores on negative indicators and the lowest scores on positive indicators; therefore, this profile was named “highly troubled.”
FIGURE 1
Figure 1. Four mental health profiles based on the z-value of each indicator. N = 1,640.
Identifying the Dark Triad Profiles
Table 4 presents the goodness of fit indices for the Dark Triad profiles. As shown in this table, the likelihood ratio statistical tests (i.e., LMR-LRT and BLRT) were significant for the two-, three-, and five-profile solutions. Compared to the two- and three-profile solutions, the five-profile solution exhibited lower AIC, BIC, and aBIC, as well as an acceptable value of the entropy. Given these results, the five-profile solution was regarded as the optimal model in this study.
TABLE 4
Table 4. The goodness of fit indices for the Dark Triad profiles.
Further, Table 5 provides a summary of the means and standard deviations of each indicator across these five Dark Triad profiles. MANOVA and post-hoc tests identified statistically significant differences between the profiles, except for no significant differences in narcissism between the second and fourth profiles, between the first and second profiles, and between the first and fourth profiles fourth profile.
TABLE 5
Table 5. Mean differences in study indicators across five Dark Triad profiles.
To interpret these profiles, we referred to prior research of the Dark Triad profiles (38) and z-scores of the observable indicators (see Figure 2). To be specific, students in the first profile (n = 121; 7.4%) reported the lowest scores on Machiavellianism and psychopathy and low scores on narcissism; thus, this profile was labeled “low Machiavellianism-psychopathy.” Students in the second profile (n = 1012; 61.7%) scored low on all dark personality traits; hence, this profile was marked “benevolent.” Students in the third profile (n = 109; 6.7%) reported the highest scores on all Dark Triad traits; therefore, this profile was named “highly malevolent.” Students in the fourth profile (n = 145; 8.8%) were characterized by high scores on Machiavellianism and psychopathy but low scores on narcissism; given this, this profile was named “low narcissism.” Students in the fifth profile (n = 253; 15.4%) reported high scores on all Dark Triad traits; hence, this profile was labeled “malevolent.”
FIGURE 2
Figure 2. Five personality profiles based on the z-value of three Dark Triad traits. N = 1,640. Mach-Psycho = Machiavellianism-Psychopathy.
The Association of the Dark Triad Profiles With Mental Health Profiles
We applied a multinomial logistic regression to investigate their associations. In this step of the analysis, the flourishing profile was regarded as the reference group compared with the other three “maladaptive” profiles. The results of a multinomial logistic regression can be found in Table 6. To ease the interpretations of the results, we referred to a visualized graph (see Figure 3).
TABLE 6
Table 6. Multiple multinomial regression analysis predicting mental health profiles.
FIGURE 3
Figure 3. The effect of the Dark Triad profiles on the probability of mental health profiles. N = 1,640. Mach-Psycho, Machiavellianism-Psychopathy.
As shown in Figure 3, students within the low Machiavellianism-psychopathy profile exhibited the highest likelihood of flourishing, and students within the low narcissism profile reported the highest likelihood of being highly troubled. Students within the benevolent and malevolent profiles showed a similar likelihood of being flourishing and troubled, but reported a higher likelihood of flourishing than being vulnerable and highly troubled. For students within the highly malevolent profile, the likelihood of flourishing was surpassed by the likelihood of being troubled, although the likelihood of flourishing was still higher than being highly troubled and vulnerable.
Discussion
Attempting to develop a comprehensive and person-centered view of the association between the Dark Triad and youth mental health, the current study examined both the Dark Triad profiles and mental health profiles among a large-scale sample of Chinese high school students. This study also examined whether differing Dark Triad profiles may diverge in mental health profiles. Results of the latent profile analyses revealed five Dark Triad profiles and four mental health profiles. Students with differing Dark Triad profiles diverged in mental health profiles.
In terms of RQ1, as expected, we found four mental health profiles: flourishing, vulnerable, troubled, and highly troubled. These profiles partially supported a dual-factor model of mental health, but we did not discover a profile characterized by high scores on both psychopathology and wellbeing (i.e., symptomatic but content). One possible explanation is that emotional restraint and avoidance of extremities are highly valued in Chinese society (20). Under this cultural emphasis, individuals are not expressive and tend to avoid reporting extremely high scores on both negative and positive indicators (66). Moreover, most students belonged to the flourishing profile. This finding indicates that, despite high academic stress and parental expectations, high school students may handle these stressors well and exhibit high academic engagement in the school setting, which is linked to the students’ positive mental health conditions.
In terms of RQ2, rather than the expected three or four profiles, we found five Dark Triad profiles: low Machiavellianism-psychopathy, benevolent, highly malevolent, low narcissism, and malevolent. The features of these profiles partially align with prior research (38) but also exhibit some additional subgroups (e.g., low Machiavellianism-psychopathy and low narcissism). These five profiles may also reflect some unique developmental features of high school students compared to prior research (38, 41, 42), Upon growing older, students may provide more differentiated self-ratings on the Dark Triad (50, 67) given that the traits are associated but distinguishable (31). Moreover, most of the high school students belonged to the benevolent profile. One possible explanation relates to Chinese culture, in which collectivism, cooperative behavior, and harmonious group wellbeing are highly valued (20). In this cultural context, youth are socialized to be “benevolent.” Notably, however, the current findings are possibly influenced by the nature of self-reports, in which students may respond to each item based on socially desirable manners and central tendencies (see “Limitations and Implications” section for elaboration) (68, 69).
Regarding RQ3, partially aligned with the hypothesis, we found that students within the low Machiavellianism-psychopathy profile exhibited the highest likelihood of flourishing, and students within the low narcissism profile reported the lowest likelihood of flourishing. This finding aligns with prior research (31, 36, 57) and indicates that Machiavellianism and psychopathy are both aversive and negative in nature, whereas narcissism shows a distinctive pattern of psychological correlates and is perceived more favorably than Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Moreover, students within benevolent and malevolent profiles showed a similar likelihood of flourishing and troubled profiles. This finding may indicate that, when youth report concurrent high or low levels of the Dark Triad, the levels may not determine the students’ optimal psychological function. After all, youth mental health is a complex issue affected by the interactions of many other personal and contextual factors, such as social support, and that complexity ultimately impacts psychological function (70).
Limitations and Implications
Several limitations should also be considered when interpreting the results. First, the study overly relies on self-report measures, which may lead to shared method variance and social desirability bias that potentially interfere with the interpretations of Dark Triad profiles and their associations with youth mental health. For instance, prior research has shown that narcissism is positively associated with social desirability, whereas Machiavellianism and psychopathy are negatively correlated with social desirability (68). These findings may explain why the current study reveals several insignificant differences in narcissism across the Dark Triad profiles, whereas Machiavellianism and psychopathy do not. In a similar vein, the research findings gathered should be carefully interpreted within cultural boundaries. Extensive existing documentation already establishes that culture plays a profound influence in shaping the self and personality construct (27, 71). Accordingly, collectivistic societies, such as China, heavily emphasize the group over the self, so youth may report relatively fewer variances in narcissism compared to youth from individualistic societies (27, 57). Second, this study is based on a cross-sectional design, and the longitudinal association between the Dark Triad and youth mental health remains unknown. Based on a cross-sectional analysis, conclusions regarding the directions of these associations therefore cannot be inferred. Prior research has suggested that dark personality characteristics are the consequence of changes in antisocial behavior (72), but future studies should broaden this line of research by leveraging a longitudinal design to clarify the directions of the Dark Triad and youth mental health (incorporating both positive and negative outcomes). Finally, the current study focuses on exploring individual differences and their associations with youth mental health, but the underlying pathways and conditional processes of the associations are underexplored. Future studies should broaden the current study by, for instance, examining the contexts in which these developments occur, such as in parent-child relationships, teacher-student relationships, and peer interactions (73). Investigating these contexts is vital to understanding mechanisms and conditional processes toward healthy adolescent development and can help identify possible targets for intervention and prevention programs.
Despite these limitations, the current study conveys essential theoretical and practical implications. First, some researchers, such as Muris et al. (30), have questioned the structure of the Dark Triad since narcissism is far less antisocial in nature than Machiavellianism and psychopathy (30, 74). Studying the Dark Triad in a person-centered approach conceptually contributes to the discussion regarding the exclusion of narcissism from the Dark Triad. Further, most existing studies have investigated the associations between the Dark Triad and psychological maladjustment (75), but little research has focused on the association of the Dark Triad with positive psychological outcomes. The current study therefore aimed to capitalize on the dual-factor model of mental health to extend prior research by gaining a more conceptually rich understanding of the Dark Triad with both positive and negative psychological outcomes. Practically, exploring the Dark Triad profiles based on their natural combinations can unmask group-specific associations between malevolent personality traits and youth mental health—associations otherwise often obscured by latent entities and global scores subsumed under specific facets. For instance, by measuring the presence of the Dark Triad among students, practitioners and health professionals could precisely locate “highly troubled” adolescents and keep them on track for early identification and subsequent mental health intervention.
Conclusion
Using a dual person-centered approach, this study exhibits a comprehensive view on the association between high school students’ mental health and the Dark Triad. Specifically, students with low Machiavellianism and psychopathy report better mental health than students with other profiles, whereas those with low narcissism exhibit a high possibility of being highly troubled.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Wenzhou University of Technology. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin.
Author Contributions
YH conceived and drafted the manuscript. XL performed the statistical analyses and critically revised the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final draft of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by the Philosophy and Social Science Planning Projects in Zhejiang Province (Project No. 22NDJC178YB) awarded to YH, based in the Wenzhou University of Technology, and supported by the grants from the Research Council of Norway (grant nos. 288083 and 320709) awarded to XL, based in the Department of Psychology, University of Oslo.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
We thank the students and all the participating schools for making this investigation possible, and thank the research assistants who contributed immensely to the data collection. We also would like to express our gratitude for the insightful comments of the two reviewers, improving the quality of the manuscript.
Footnotes
- ^ The dark personality literature is still swiftly evolving. For instance, investigations on the Dark Tetrad and Light Triad (faith in humanity, humanism, and Kantianism) have gained increasing popularity in the scientific community (32, 76). In the current study, we aimed to explore the Dark Triad profiles in a sample of Chinese high school students as an extension of the research findings from other populations (38), and as a confirmatory investigation to respond to the inconsistent findings in this field (42, 43). Focusing on the Dark Tetrad and Light Triad, albeit interesting, ultimately extends beyond the current focus. Moreover, validating the targeted measurements in Chinese youth remains scarce, making this initiative less practical. Recent studies have, however, revealed a unique explained variance of sadism over the Dark Triad (77) and demonstrated meaningful Dark Tetrad profiles (41). Accordingly, future investigations on a comprehensive and person-centered view of the association of the Dark Tetrad profiles (may also be extended to the Light Triad) with youth mental health are warranted.
References
1. Daddis C. Desire for increased autonomy and adolescents’ perceptions of peer autonomy:“Everyone else can; why can’t I?”. Child Dev. (2011) 82:1310–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01587.x
2. Van Petegem S, Vansteenkiste M, Beyers W. The jingle-jangle fallacy in adolescent autonomy in the family: in search of an underlying structure. J Youth Adolesc. (2013) 42:994–1014. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9847-7
3. Liu Y, Lu Z. Chinese high school students’ academic stress and depressive symptoms: gender and school climate as moderators. Stress Health. (2012) 28:340–6. doi: 10.1002/smi.2418
4. Chi X, Liu X, Huang Q, Huang L, Zhang P, Chen X. Depressive symptoms among junior high school students in southern China: prevalence, changes, and psychosocial correlates. J Affect Disord. (2020) 274:1191–200. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.034
5. Wang P, Wang J, Yan Y, Si Y, Zhan X, Tian Y. Relationship between loneliness and depression among Chinese junior high school students: the serial mediating roles of internet gaming disorder, social network use, and generalized pathological internet use. Front Psychol. (2021) 11:4030. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.529665
6. Antaramian SP, Scott Huebner E, Hills KJ, Valois RF. A dual-factor model of mental health: toward a more comprehensive understanding of youth functioning. Am J Orthopsychiat. (2010) 80:462–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01049.x
7. Keyes CLM. Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health. J Consult Clin Psychol. (2005) 73:539–48. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.3.539
8. Seligman MEP, Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive psychology: an introduction. Am Psychol. (2000) 55:5–14.
9. Suldo SM, Shaffer EJ. Looking beyond psychopathology: the dual-factor model of mental health in youth. School Psychol Rev. (2008) 37:52–68.
10. Lan X, Ma C, Ma Y. A person-centered investigation of adolescent psychosocial and academic adjustment: the role of peer attachment and zhong-yong thinking. Child Indicat Res. (2021) 14:1479–500. doi: 10.1007/s12187-021-09807-2
11. Greenspoon PJ, Saklofske DH. Toward an integration of subjective well-being and psychopathology. Soc Indicat Res. (2001) 54:81–108. doi: 10.1023/A:1007219227883
12. Achenbach TM. Manual for the Youth Self-Report and 1991 Profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont (1991).
13. De Clercq B, Van Leeuwen K, De Fruyt F, Van Hiel A, Mervielde I. Maladaptive personality traits and psychopathology in childhood and adolescence: the moderating effect of parenting. J Personal. (2008) 76:357–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00489.x
14. Diener E, Scollon CN, Lucas RE. The evolving concept of subjective well-being: The multifaceted nature of happiness. In: Diener E editor. Assessing Well-Being: The Collected Works of Ed Diener. New York, NY: Springer (2009). p. 67–100.
15. Suldo SM, Thalji-Raitano A, Kiefer SM, Ferron JM. Conceptualizing high school students’ mental health through a dual-factor model. School Psychol Rev. (2016) 45:434–57. doi: 10.17105/SPR45-4.434-457
16. Lan X, Marci T, Moscardino U. Parental autonomy support, grit, and psychological adjustment in Chinese adolescents from divorced families. J Fam Psychol. (2019) 33:511–20. doi: 10.1037/fam0000514
17. Simpson EG, Vannucci A, Ohannessian CM. Family functioning and adolescent internalizing symptoms: a latent profile analysis. J Adolesc. (2018) 64:136–45. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.02.004
18. Liu GXY, Helwig CC. Autonomy, social inequality, and support in Chinese urban and rural adolescents’ reasoning about the Chinese College Entrance Examination (Gaokao). J Adolesc Res. (2020) 2020:743558420914082. doi: 10.1177/0743558420914082
19. Fuligni AJ. Authority, autonomy, and parent-adolescent conflict and cohesion: a study of adolescents from Mexican, Chinese, Filipino, and European backgrounds. Dev Psychol. (1998) 34:782–92. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.34.4.782
20. Chen X. Socioemotional development in Chinese children. In: Bond MH editor. Handbook of Chinese psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press (2010). p. 37–52.
21. Lan X. Perceived parenting styles, cognitive flexibility, and prosocial behavior in Chinese Youth with an immigrant background: a three-group comparison. Curr Psychol. (2022) 2022:1–19. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03140-9
22. Tao VY, Hong YY. When academic achievement is an obligation: perspectives from social-oriented achievement motivation. J Cross Cult Psychol. (2014) 45:110–36. doi: 10.1177/0022022113490072
23. Kim HS, Sherman DK, Taylor SE. Culture and social support. Am Psychol. (2008) 63:518–26. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X
24. Mortenson ST. Cultural differences and similarities in seeking social support as a response to academic failure: a comparison of American and Chinese college students. Commun Educ. (2006) 55:127–46. doi: 10.1080/03634520600565811
25. Norasakkunkit V, Kalick SM. Culture, ethnicity, and emotional distress measures: the role of self-construal and self-enhancement. J Cross Cult Psychol. (2002) 33:56–70. doi: 10.1177/0022022102033001004
26. Lan X. Perceived parental warmth, emotional awareness, and positive adjustment profiles in Chinese and Italian early adolescents: a person-centered approach. J Adolesc. (2022) 94:206–23. doi: 10.1002/jad.12018
27. Markus HR, Kitayama S. The cultural construction of self and emotion: Implications for social behavior. In: Kitayama S, Markus HM editors. Emotion and Culture: Empirical Studies of Mutual Influence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association (1994). 89/130 p.
28. Taylor SE, Sherman DK, Kim HS, Jarcho J, Takagi K, Dunagan MS. Culture and social support: who seeks it and why? J Personal Soc Psychol. (2004) 87:354–62. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.354
29. Feng L, Lan X. The moderating role of autonomy support profiles in the association between grit and externalizing problem behavior among family-bereaved adolescents. Front Psychol. (2020) 11:1578. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01578
30. Muris P, Merckelbach H, Otgaar H, Meijer E. The malevolent side of human nature: a meta-analysis and critical review of the literature on the dark triad (narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy). Perspect Psychol Sci. (2017) 12:183–204.
31. Paulhus DL, Williams KM. The Dark Triad of personality: narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. J Res Personal. (2002) 36:556–63. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
32. Paulhus DL. Toward a taxonomy of dark personalities. Curr Direct Psychol Sci. (2014) 23:421–6. doi: 10.1177/0963721414547737
33. Jones DN, Paulhus DL. Introducing the short dark triad (SD3): a Brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment. (2014) 21:28–41. doi: 10.1177/1073191113514105
34. Götz FM, Bleidorn W, Rentfrow PJ. Age differences in Machiavellianism across the life span: evidence from a large-scale cross-sectional study. J Personal. (2020) 88:978–92. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12545
35. Burtăverde V, Chraif M, Aniţei M, Mihăilă T. The incremental validity of the dark triad in predicting driving aggression. Accid Anal Prevent. (2016) 96:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.027
36. Furnham A, Richards SC, Paulhus DL. The dark triad of personality: a 10 year review. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. (2013) 7:199–216. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12018
37. Hudson NW. Lighten the darkness: personality interventions targeting agreeableness also reduce participants’ levels of the dark triad. J Personal. (2022) 2022:1–16. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12714
38. Nguyen N, Pascart S, Borteyrou X. The dark triad personality traits and work behaviors: a person-centered approach. Personal Individ Differ. (2020) 170:110432. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110432
39. Tein JY, Coxe S, Cham H. Statistical power to detect the correct number of classes in latent profile analysis. Struct Equat Model. (2013) 20:640–57. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2013.824781
40. Ma C, Ma Y, Wang Y, Lan X. Empathy and psychosocial adjustment in Tibetan and Han adolescents: a person-centered approach. Front Psychol. (2019) 10:1896. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01896
41. Chabrol H, Melioli T, Van Leeuwen N, Rodgers R, Goutaudier N. The Dark Tetrad: identifying personality profiles in high-school students. Pers Individ Differ. (2015) 83:97–101. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.051
42. Kam CCS, Zhou M. Is the dark triad better studied using a variable- or a person-centered approach? An exploratory investigation. PLoS One. (2016) 11:e0161628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161628
43. Garcia D, MacDonald S. Dark personality profiles: estimating the cluster structure of the Dark Triad. PsyCh J. (2017) 6:239–40. doi: 10.1002/pchj.175
44. Li R, Yao M, Chen Y, Liu H. Parent autonomy support and psychological control, dark triad, and subjective well-being of Chinese adolescents: synergy of variable-and person-centered approaches. J Early Adolesc. (2020) 40:966–95. doi: 10.1177/0272431619880335
45. Zhang W, Zou H, Wang M, Finy MS. The role of the Dark Triad traits and two constructs of emotional intelligence on loneliness in adolescents. Pers Individ Differ. (2015) 75:74–9. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.025
46. Geng Y, Chang G, Li L, Zhang R, Sun Q, Huang J. Machiavellianism in Chinese adolescents: links to internalizing and externalizing problems. Pers Individ Differ. (2016) 89:19–23. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.037
47. Geng Y, Gu J, Yu J, Zhu X. Negative life events and depressive symptoms among Chinese adolescents: mediating role of resilience and moderating role of psychopathy. Curr Psychol. (2020) 2020:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s12144-020-00621-7
48. Bradley RH, Corwyn RF. Socioeconomic status and child development. Annu Rev Psychol. (2002) 53:371–99. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233
49. Lan X, Sun Q. Exploring psychosocial adjustment profiles in Chinese adolescents from divorced families: the interplay of parental attachment and adolescent’s gender. Curr Psychol. (2020) 2020:1–17. doi: 10.1007/s12144-020-01097-1
50. Klimstra TA, Sijtsema JJ, Henrichs J, Cima M. The dark triad of personality in adolescence: psychometric properties of a concise measure and associations with adolescent adjustment from a multi-informant perspective. J Res Pers. (2014) 53:84–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2014.09.001
51. Li X, Zou H, Wang L. A comparative study on school adjustment between migrant children in public schools and those in migrant worker children’s schools. Chin J Special Educ. (2009) 9:81–6.
52. Lan X, Radin R. Direct and interactive effects of peer attachment and grit on mitigating problem behaviors among urban left-behind adolescents. J Child Fam Stud. (2020) 29:250–60. doi: 10.1007/s10826-019-01580-9
53. Huebner ES. Preliminary development and validation of a multidimensional life satisfaction scale for children. Psychol Assess. (1994) 6:149–58. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1423-5
54. Ma Y, Ma C, Lan X. Openness to experience moderates the association of warmth profiles and subjective well-being in left-behind and non-left-behind youth. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19:4103. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074103
56. Lan X, Zhang L. Shields for emotional well-being in Chinese adolescents who switch schools: the role of teacher autonomy support and grit. Front Psychol. (2019) 10:2384. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02384
57. Zhang J, Ziegler M, Paulhus DL. Development and evaluation of the Short Dark Triad – Chinese version (SD3-C). Curr Psychol. (2020) 39:1161–71. doi: 10.1007/s12144-019-00272-3
58. Lan X. Disengaged and highly harsh? Perceived parenting profiles, narcissism, and loneliness among adolescents from divorced families. Pers Individ Differ. (2020) 171:110466. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110466
59. Lan X. Grit and peer relationships in early adolescence: a person-centered approach. J Soc Pers Relationsh. (2020) 37:2250–69. doi: 10.1177/0265407520921557
61. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User’s Guide: Statistical Analysis with Latent Variables. 7th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén (2012).
62. Little RJ, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons (1987).
63. Enders CK. The performance of the full information maximum likelihood estimator in multiple regression models with missing data. Educ Psychol Measure. (2001) 61:713–40. doi: 10.1177/00131640121971482
64. Ferguson SL, Moore EWG, Hull DM. Finding latent groups in observed data: a primer on latent profile analysis in Mplus for applied researchers. Int J Behav Dev. (2020) 44:458–68. doi: 10.1177/0165025419881721
65. Marsh HW, Lüdtke O, Trautwein U, Morin AJ. Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: synergy of person-and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Struct Equat Model. (2009) 16:191–225. doi: 10.1080/10705510902751010
66. Soto JA, Perez CR, Kim YH, Lee EA, Minnick MR. Is expressive suppression always associated with poorer psychological functioning? A cross-cultural comparison between European Americans and Hong Kong Chinese. Emotion. (2011) 11:1450–5. doi: 10.1037/a0023340
67. Allik J, Laidra K, Realo A, Pullmann H. Personality development from 12 to 18 years of age: changes in mean levels and structure of traits. Eur J Pers. (2004) 18:445–62. doi: 10.1002/per.524
68. Kowalski CM, Rogoza R, Vernon PA, Schermer JA. The Dark Triad and the self-presentation variables of socially desirable responding and self-monitoring. Pers Individ Differ. (2018) 120:234–7. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.007
69. Pabian S, De Backer CJ, Vandebosch H. Dark Triad personality traits and adolescent cyber-aggression. Pers Individ Differ. (2015) 75:41–6. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.015
70. Bronfenbrenner U, Morris PA. The bioecological model of human development. 6th ed. In: Lerner RM editor. Handbook of Child Psychology. (Vol. 1), Hoboken, NJ: Wiley (2006). p. 793–828.
71. Foster JD, Campbell WK, Twenge JM. Individual differences in narcissism: inflated self-views across the lifespan and around the world. J Res Pers. (2003) 37:469–86. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00026-6
72. Sijtsema JJ, Garofalo C, Jansen K, Klimstra TA. Disengaging from evil: longitudinal associations between the dark triad, moral disengagement, and antisocial behavior in adolescence. J Abnorm Child Psychol. (2019) 47:1351–65. doi: 10.1007/s10802-019-00519-4
73. Morris AS, Steinberg L. Adolescent development. Annu Rev Psychol. (2001) 52:83–110. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.83
74. Kowalski CM, Vernon PA, Schermer JA. The general factor of personality: the relationship between the big one and the dark triad. Pers Individ Differ. (2016) 88:256–60. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.028
75. Kowalski CM, Rogoza R, Saklofske DH, Schermer JA. Dark triads, tetrads, tents, and cores: why navigate (research) the jungle of dark personality models without a compass (criterion)? Acta Psychol. (2021) 221:103455. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103455
76. Kaufman SB, Yaden DB, Hyde E, Tsukayama E. The light vs. dark triad of personality: contrasting two very different profiles of human nature. Front Psychol. (2019) 10:467. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00467
Keywords: mental health, dark triad, high school students, person-centered approach, personality
Citation: Hu Y and Lan X (2022) A Comprehensive and Person-Centered View of the Association Between the Dark Triad and Youth Mental Health. Front. Psychiatry 13:900354. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.900354
Received: 20 March 2022; Accepted: 14 June 2022;
Published: 30 June 2022.
Edited by:
Matt DeLisi, Iowa State University, United StatesReviewed by:
Radka Čopková, Technical University of Košice, SlovakiaBéla Birkás, University of Pécs, Hungary
Copyright © 2022 Hu and Lan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xiaoyu Lan, eGlhb3l1LmxhbkBwc3lrb2xvZ2kudWlvLm5v; orcid.org/0000-0003-3166-9869