Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry, 26 May 2022
Sec. Sleep Disorders
This article is part of the Research Topic Interaction Between Neuropsychiatry and Sleep Disorders: from Mechanism to Clinical Practice View all 19 articles

Chronotypes, Sleep and Mental Distress Among Chinese College Students: A Cross-Sectional Study

\nJiajia WangJiajia Wang1Shuai LiuShuai Liu1Junlong GuoJunlong Guo1Rong XiaoRong Xiao2Jia YuJia Yu3Xian LuoXian Luo1Yan XuYan Xu1Yuhan ZhaoYuhan Zhao1Yingru CuiYingru Cui1Yue GuYue Gu1Lidan CaiLidan Cai1Bin Zhang
Bin Zhang1*
  • 1Department of Psychiatry, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
  • 2Department of Psychology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
  • 3Department of Psychosomatic Diseases, The Third People's Hospital of Panzhihua, Panzhihua, China

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the chronotypes and their relationship with sleep disturbances and mental distress among college students.

Methods: Students from a university in Guangzhou, China, were recruited through a cross-sectional online survey. Data were collected by self-reported questionnaires including socio-demographics, lifestyles and health conditions, sleep patterns on weekdays and weekends, as well as the reduced Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (rMEQ), the Insomnia Severity Index, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, the Beck Depression Inventory-13, and the Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale. Multivariate analyses were performed to examine the associations of chronotypes with sleep compensation, sleep disturbances, and mental distress.

Results: A total of 1,607 questionnaires were received, among which 1,569 (97.6%) were valid for further analysis. Among these participants [mean age 19.86 ± 1.16 (15–27) years], morning types (M-types), intermediate types (I-types), and evening types (E-types) accounted for 14.9, 71.5, and 13.6%, respectively. The regression analysis revealed that E-types were positively associated with long sleep compensation on weekends (adjusted OR 2.443, 95%CI 1.740-3.429) compared with I-types, while M-types were the opposite (adjusted OR 0.623, 95%CI 0.392–0.990). E-types were also positively correlated with insomnia symptoms (adjusted OR 2.000, 95%CI 1.428–2.801), depressive symptoms (adjusted OR 2.068, 95%CI 1.496–2.858), and anxiety symptoms (adjusted OR 2.188, 95%CI 1.387–3.451). However, no significant association was found between chronotypes and excessive daytime sleepiness.

Conclusion: Our study found that E-types were associated with long sleep compensation on weekends and insomnia, depression, and anxiety symptoms. Our findings emphasized the importance of early recognition and intervention of E-types and their accompanied sleep problems and mental distress.

Introduction

Chronotype refers to an individual's endogenous circadian rhythms and how it embeds into the 24-h day, which received increasing attention in the last decades (1, 2). There are three different categories of chronotypes: the morning type (M-type), the evening type (E-type), and the intermediate type (I-type) (3). Evidence demonstrated that chronotype widely affects physiology, cognition, and behavior (4). M-type individuals get up early and reach their peak of cognitive and physical performance in the morning compared with E-types who prefer later bed and wake times. Besides, M-type people find it difficult to stay awake at late-night hours, while E-type people plan their daily activities for the afternoon or evening and reach their peak performance later. Although the distinction of chronotypes is quite easy, most people are I-types rather than at the ends of this continuum (5). The individual differences in chronotypes seem to be influenced by age (6), gender (7), inherited (8), perinatal (9), and environmental factors to some extent (10).

Previous studies found that in addition to differences in sleep timing between different chronotypes, E-types had a shorter time in bed during the weekdays and slept longer on weekends than M-types (11). E-types were also associated with a greater likelihood of sleep disturbances, including insomnia (12, 13). Although previous research suggested that E-types were associated with poor sleep and daytime sleepiness (14), few studies investigated the chronotype with sleep disturbance and the sleep pattern of different chronotypes on weekdays and weekends among Chinese college students. A previous study in China indicated that E-type college students were associated with more sleep difficulties (15). Several studies showed that E-types were associated with increased risk for a constellation of negative health outcomes, including mental and physical health problems (16, 17). For instance, a meta-analysis (18) found a positive association between E-types and depressive symptoms in longitudinal and cross-sectional studies. However, the relationship between chronotypes and anxiety symptoms was inconsistent. Some research found that E-types are related to elevation in anxiety symptoms (19, 20), whereas another did not find a relationship between E-types and anxiety (13). Thus, the association between chronotype and mental distress remains unclear and warrants further investigation.

College students who form a subset of the world's population appear to be more vulnerable to sleep disturbance and mental distress due to the exhaustive routine of studies and extracurricular activities. Given that E-types are associated with many adverse effects on physical and mental health, we investigated the association of chronotypes with sleep disturbances and mental distress among Chinese college students. Therefore, we aimed to describe the contemporary chronotype distribution in a large sample of college students in the present work. We further aimed to describe sleep patterns, sleep disturbance, and mental distress with chronotypes in order to provide evidence for further prevention and control of sleep disturbance and mental distress in college students.

Methods

Participants

This survey was part of a school-based cross-sectional study conducted at a university in Guangzhou from December 2019 to January 2020. Participants who met the following criteria were included in the study: (1) undergraduate students studying in the university; (2) WeChat users; (3) volunteers to participate in this survey. Using the method of convenient sampling, 1,607 college students in Guangzhou completed the questionnaires compiled by the Questionnaire Star platform relying on WeChat. This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University (QTEC-2019-101).

Instruments

Socio-Demographics, Lifestyles, and Health Conditions

At the first of the questionnaire, the socio-demographic data were collected, including gender, grade, ethnicity, place of residence, whether they are the only child or not, their parents' education level (tertiary education or above), and family incomes (<5,000 yuan/month or ≥5,000 yuan/month). Lifestyles and health conditions included body-mass index (BMI, ≥25 kg/m2 or <25 kg/m2), habitual napping (≥3 days/week), habitual snoring (≥3 days/week), chronic medical conditions, smoking, alcohol drinking, boarding in school, time spent on TV or Internet (≥4 or <4 h/day), duration of mobile phone use before sleep (≥1 or <1 h/day), perceived learning pressure (high or low), learning interest (high or low).

Sleep Patterns and Weekend Sleep Compensation

Sleep patterns were collected, including habitual bedtimes and wake-up times on weekdays and weekends. Weekend sleep compensation was calculated as the difference between time in bed on weekends and weekdays, and long weekend sleep compensation was defined as compensation ≥2 h (21).

Reduced Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (rMEQ)

The reduced Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (rMEQ), developed by Adan and Almirall, is the most convenient and commonly used method to assess chronotype. It extracted five items from the original MEQ (items 1, 7, 10, 18, and 19) (5, 22) to assess the morningness-eveningness preference. The overall scores range from 4 to 25, with lower scores meaning a stronger preference for E-types. Participants whose scores were higher than 17 and lower than 12 were classified as morning and evening types, respectively, and participants scoring between 12 and 17 were classified as I-types. The rMEQ has been verified in the Chinese population and was proved to have good reliability and validity (Cronbach's alpha = 0.74) (23, 24).

Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)

The ISI comprises seven items that evaluate insomnia subtypes and daytime dysfunction due to sleep difficulties in the past 2 weeks. The index is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = completely ineffective, 4 = very serious), and the total scores range from 0 to 28 (25, 26). A total score of ≥8 is considered to have insomnia symptoms. The internal reliability of the Chinese version of ISI was great (Cronbach's alpha = 0.8) (27).

Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)

This scale assesses individuals' subjective daytime sleepiness and consists of seven items using a 4-point Likert scale. The sum score of the scale ranges from 0 (no chance of dozing) to 24 (highest chance of dozing). Excessive daytime sleepiness is defined as having a total score of 10 or higher (28). The Chinese version of ESS is reliable and well-validated (Cronbach's alpha = 0.81) (29).

Beck Depression Inventory-13 (BDI-13)

The BDI-13 is a 13-item scale evaluating the severity of depressive symptoms in the past week (30). A higher total score indicates a more severe depressive symptom. Each item is rated by a 4-point Likert scale (0 = none, 3 = severe), yielding a total score of 0 to 39. A total score of ≥5 was considered to experience depressive symptoms. The BDI-13 has been demonstrated good reliability and validity in previous studies of the Chinese population (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89) (31).

Zung Self-Rated Anxiety Scale (SAS)

The SAS is used to measure the anxiety symptoms in the past seven days (32). It consists of 20 items, each rated on a 4-point Likert scale (e.g., 1 = never or a little of the time, 4 = most of the time). The total score ranges from 25 to 100, multiplying the original score by 1.25. A total score of ≥50 was regarded as suffering from anxiety symptoms. The Chinese version of the questionnaire has been widely used and has satisfactory reliability and validity (Cronbach's alpha =0.78) (33).

Statistical Analysis

The characteristics and distribution of chronotypes were described by descriptive statistics. Continuous variables were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), and non-normally distributed variables were expressed as median (interquartile range [IQR]), while the discrete variables were reported as percentages. In univariate analyses, differences between categorical variables were assessed using the chi-squared test. Statistical intergroup differences were analyzed using the t-test, one-way ANOVA, and Kruskal–Wallis test, which examined the association of socio-demographics, lifestyles, health conditions with sleep patterns, sleep disturbances, and mental distress. The Bonferroni post-hoc test for multiple comparisons was used for statistical analysis when necessary. Those factors significantly associated with sleep disturbances and mental distress would be further controlled in binary logistic regression models. In multivariate analyses, after adjusting for age and gender using the ENTER method, as well as other socio-demographics, lifestyles, and health conditions that had a significant difference in univariate analyses by using the forward likelihood method, binary logistic regression was performed to determine the strengths of the relationships between chronotypes and sleep compensation, sleep disturbances, and mental distress.

Results

General Characteristics of Participants

A total of 1607 questionnaires were received, among which 1,569 (97.6%) were valid for further analysis. Table 1 shows the socio-demographic and lifestyle characteristic of all valid participants. The participants consisted of 681 males (43.4%) and 888 females (56.6%), with an average age of 19.86 ± 1.16 years old (15–27 years old). Based on the score of rMEQ, 14.9% of the participants were found to be M-types, 71.5% were I-types, and 13.6% were E-types. In comparison of these three groups, differences were found significant in only child situation, rural area, family incomes, time spent on TV or Internet, duration of mobile phone use before sleep, alcohol drinking, chronic medical conditions, and interest in study (all p <0.05).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Demographic and lifestyle characteristics of participants stratified by chronotypes.

Sleep Patterns, Sleep Disturbances, and Mental Distress Among Different Chronotypes

As shown in Table 2, significant differences were found in time in bed and sleep-wake habits among three groups both on weekdays and weekends (p <0.001). There were significant differences among the three on weekday bedtime and get-up time, weekend bedtime and get-up time, as well as sleep compensation during weekends (p <0.001). E-types had later bedtime, shorter weekdays time in bed, and more sleep compensation than M-types, and I-types showed a sleep pattern between these two extremes. In addition, E-types had significantly higher scores in ISI, BDI-13, and SAS when compared with M-types and I-types (all p <0.001). However, there was no difference in ESS total score among the three chronotypes (p >0.05).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Comparisons of sleep patterns, sleep disturbances, and mental distress among different chronotypes.

Comparisons of Sample Characteristics in Participants With Sleep Compensation, Sleep Disturbances, and Mental Distress

The relationships between the characteristics of participants and sleep compensation, sleep disturbances, and mental distress are presented in Tables 3, 4. In socio-demographic factors, age was related to sleep compensation and insomnia symptoms (p <0.05), and gender was related to sleep compensation, excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), depressive and anxiety symptoms (p <0.001). In addition, rural areas and family incomes (≥5,000 yuan/month) were significantly associated with EDS (p <0.05), while parents' education level and family incomes (≥5,000 yuan/month) were significantly associated with depressive symptoms (p <0.05). With respect to lifestyle and health condition, time spent on TV or Internet (≥4 h/day), duration of mobile phone use before sleep (≥1 h/day), chronic medical conditions, high study pressure, low interest in learning were correlated with sleep compensation, sleep disturbances, and mental distress (p <0.05), except for duration of mobile phone use before sleep with EDS (p =0.238) and chronic medical conditions for sleep compensation (p =0.09). In addition, habitual napping (≥3 days/week) and smoking were correlated with depressive symptoms (p <0.05). What is more, chronotypes were correlated with sleep compensation, insomnia, depressive and anxiety symptoms (p <0.001), while there was no significant difference between chronotypes and EDS (p =0.107). When compared with M-types and I-types, E-types were associated with long weekend sleep compensation as well as more insomnia symptoms, EDS, and depressive symptoms (p <0.05), while there was no significant difference between M-types and I-types in these outcomes (p <0.05). Significant differences only existed between I-types and E-types in anxiety symptoms after Bonferroni correction. Those characteristics significantly related to sleep compensation, sleep disturbances, and mental distress were further controlled in multivariate analyses for chronotypes in these problems.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Comparisons of sample characteristics in participants with and without sleep compensation and sleep disturbances.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Comparisons of sample characteristics in participants with and without mental distress.

Multivariable Logistic Analyses

The binary logistic regression analysis results of the related factors of sleep disturbances and mental distress are shown in Table 5. After adjusting the socio-demographics, lifestyles, and health conditions, using the I-types as a reference, the E-types were found to indicate a higher risk of insomnia symptoms (adjusted OR 2.000, 95%CI 1.428–2.801), depressive symptoms (adjusted OR 2.068, 95%CI 1.496–2.858) and anxiety symptoms (adjusted OR 2.188, 95%CI 1.387–3.451). Compared with I-types, E-types were more likely to have long sleep compensation on weekends (adjusted OR 2.443, 95%CI 1.740–3.429), while M-types were the opposite (adjusted OR 0.623, 95%CI 0.392–0.990). Nonetheless, no significant associations were observed between chronotypes and EDS, except for E-types, which tended to have an association with EDS (p = 0.059).

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Associations of chronotypes with sleep disturbances and mental distress.

Discussion

This cross-sectional study attempted to investigate the distribution of chronotypes and the relationship between sleep disturbance and mental distress among college students. We identified that compared with I-types, E-types were positively associated with insomnia symptoms, sleep compensation, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms, while M-types were negatively associated with sleep compensation.

In this study, we found that the most common chronotype of college students (71.5%) is I-type, which is consistent with previous studies (1, 34). In addition, the proportion of M-types (14.9%) was slightly higher than that of E-types (13.6%), which is consistent with a study in Hungary (35), but is different from an American study (36). Possible explanations for this discrepancy may include differences in the study sample size and population-related differences, such as the existence of socio-cultural diversity between the Chinese and Western populations.

We found that the E-type individuals were more likely to have sleep compensation on weekends, while those who were M-types were less likely to have sleep compensation on weekends. Several previous studies revealed that E-types generally go to bed and get up significantly later than M-types on both weekdays and weekends, which is consistent with our study (12, 37). Therefore, E-types are associated with a later bedtime and get-up time and a shorter time in bed during the weekdays when they are limited by the school schedule. However, on weekends, when there are less constrained by morning social demands, E-types may extend their sleep until a more favorable biological wake-up time to make up the deficit accumulated on weekdays (38). The need to get up at an earlier biological time to accommodate study and social demands on weekdays and frequently shift their sleep patterns between weekdays and weekends, producing a distinct phenomenon termed “social jetlag” (39, 40), might explain why E-types had more sleep compensation than other types.

This study also identified that E-types were more likely to have insomnia symptoms. Several previous studies revealed that E-type insomnia patients showed greater sleep-wake variability, more sleep-related dysfunctional cognitions, and less sleep hygiene knowledge than those with other chronotypes (41). It has also been hypothesized that E-types, with maladaptive sleep-related cognitions and irregular sleep schedules, might be a risk factor for perpetuating insomnia symptoms (42).

Our findings indicate a tendency toward a significant relationship between E-types and EDS, which is consistent with previous research that found a higher complaint of EDS among college students with E-types (43). Similarly, a previous study confirmed a significant association between M-types and lesser EDS (38). However, a previous study reported the absence of a correlation between chronotype and EDS among college students (44). The possible explanation for this observed discrepancy might be the different study populations, socio-demographic characteristics, and socio-cultural characteristics. The existing findings between chronotypes and EDS in college students remain inconclusive; further investigation is required.

With respect to mental distress, the finding of this study indicates that E-types were positively associated with depressive symptoms and anxiety symptoms of college students after controlling for other predictors, which is consistent with many previous studies (4547). Similar findings showed that the E-type was correlated with depressive symptoms in Chinese college students and Dutch (48, 49). Many factors might contribute to the increased mental distress risks among E-types in a complex way. Previous research showed that the main mechanism underlying chronotype and mood problems involved variations in biological clock genes (CLOCK, PER1, and PER2) (50). Moreover, previous studies suggested that chronotypes and sleep disruption may play an important role in susceptibility to mental distress and the precipitation of disorder symptoms (51, 52). Furthermore, people with E-types may increase the risk of mental health problems, including depression and anxiety due to disturbance of the sleep and wake cycle with melatonin and serotonin deficiency (53, 54).

The findings of the present study have important clinical and public health implications. Intervention and prevention strategies should be directed to target both the E-type and mental health in the context of psychopathology. Several positive and effective measures should be taken to avoid delay of the circadian rhythm of E-types, such as reducing the use of electronic devices with luminous screens (i.e., game consoles, tablets, computers, and mobile phones) before bedtime. Furthermore, they are supposed to get enough early light exposure by going outside early in the morning, which may help stabilize and advance their circadian rhythms. Therefore, it is important for school and health care providers to provide sleep hygiene education and necessary psychological intervention in time so as to prevent further exacerbations when detecting students with sleep disturbances and mental distress. Further prospective studies are warranted to examine the efficacy of interventions and prevention programs for circadian factors in improving sleep and mental health problems.

The advantages of the present study lie in its large sample size, which can make our findings convincing. Furthermore, to our best knowledge, there are few studies investigating the chronotypes and their relationships with sleep disturbances and mental distress among Chinese college students. Our study also has some limitations. Firstly, this cross-sectional survey cannot determine the causal relationship between chronotypes and their correlates. Secondly, data were collected through self-reported questionnaires rather than objective measures; this might lead to recall bias and social desirability bias. Physiological measurements of circadian rhythms (i.e., actigraphy) are more accurate methods to assess the chronotype, but these methods are too challenging and expensive for such a large sample as in this study, while the use of self-report questionnaires by online surveys can collect a large amount of data efficiently within a comparatively short time. However, research showed a strong correlation between subjective and objective measures of chronotypes and sleep durations. In addition, it was unable to calculate a response rate because the accurate number of students who received the message of the link was unknown. Finally, all of the participants were recruited from a single college, which may limit the finding's generalizability.

Conclusions

Our study showed a significant correlation between E-types and long weekend sleep compensation, symptoms of insomnia, depression, and anxiety among Chinese college students. Our findings emphasize the importance of early recognition and intervention of E-types and their accompanied sleep problems and mental distress.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University (QTEC-2019-101). Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants' legal guardian/next of kin.

Author Contributions

JW and BZ: conceptualization. JW, SL, and BZ: methodology. JW: writing—original draft. JW, SL, and JG: formal analysis. SL, RX, JY, XL, YX, YZ, YC, YG, LC, and BZ: investigation, resources, and data curation. SL, JG, and BZ: writing—review and editing. SL and BZ: funding acquisition. BZ: supervision and project administration. All authors have approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2021YFC2501500), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (BZ: Grant No. 82071488 and SL: Grant No. 81901348), the Chinese Sleep Research Society Hansoh Project, China (Grant No. 2019HSC03), the President Foundation of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University (BZ: Grant No. 2019Z014), and Education Research Projects of Nanfang Hospital (Grant No. 21NJ-ZDPY01).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all college students who participated in this study.

References

1. Adan A, Archer SN, Hidalgo MP, Di Milia L, Natale V, Randler C. Circadian typology: a comprehensive review. Chronobiol Int. (2012) 29:1153–75. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2012.719971

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Roenneberg T, Kuehnle T, Juda M, Kantermann T, Allebrandt K, Gordijn M, et al. Epidemiology of the human circadian clock. Sleep Med Rev. (2007) 11:429–38. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2007.07.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Park H, Lee HK, Lee K. Chronotype and suicide: the mediating effect of depressive symptoms. Psychiatry Res. (2018) 269:316–20. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.08.046

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Vitale JA, Bjoerkesett E, Campana A, Panizza G, Weydahl A. Chronotype and response to training during the polar night: a pilot study. Int J Circumpolar Health. (2017) 76:1320919. doi: 10.1080/22423982.2017.1320919

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Horne JA, Ostberg O. A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. Int J Chronobiol. (1976) 4:97–110. doi: 10.1037/t02254-000

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Kim SJ, Lee YJ, Kim H, Cho IH, Lee JY, Cho SJ. Age as a moderator of the association between depressive symptoms and morningness-eveningness. J Psychosom Res. (2010) 68:159–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.06.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Adan A, Natale V. Gender differences in morningness-eveningness preference. Chronobiol Int. (2002) 19:709–20. doi: 10.1081/CBI-120005390

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Lazar AS, Slak A, Lo JC, Santhi N, von Schantz M, Archer SN, et al. Sleep, diurnal preference, health, and psychological well-being: a prospective single-allelic-variation study. Chronobiol Int. (2012) 29:131–46. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2011.641193

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Seron-Ferre M, Mendez N, Abarzua-Catalan L, Vilches N, Valenzuela FJ, Reynolds HE, et al. Circadian rhythms in the fetus. Mol Cell Endocrinol. (2012) 349:68–75. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.07.039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Vollmer C, Randler C, Di Milia L. Further evidence for the influence of photoperiod at birth on chronotype in a sample of German adolescents. Chronobiol Int. (2012) 29:1345–51. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2012.728656

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Giannotti F, Cortesi F, Sebastiani T, Ottaviano S. Circadian preference, sleep and daytime behaviour in adolescence. J Sleep Res. (2002) 11:191–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2869.2002.00302.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Kabrita CS, Hajjar-Muca TA, Duffy JF. Predictors of poor sleep quality among Lebanese university students: association between evening typology, lifestyle behaviors, and sleep habits. Nat Sci Sleep. (2014) 6:11–8. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S55538

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Alvaro PK, Roberts RM, Harris JK. The independent relationships between insomnia, depression, subtypes of anxiety, and chronotype during adolescence. Sleep Med. (2014) 15:934–41. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2014.03.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Schneider AM, Randler C. Daytime sleepiness during transition into daylight saving time in adolescents: are owls higher at risk? Sleep Med. (2009) 10:1047–50. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2008.08.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Zhou J, Hsiao FC, Shi X, Yang J, Huang Y, Jiang Y, et al. Chronotype and depressive symptoms: a moderated mediation model of sleep quality and resilience in the 1st-year college students. J Clin Psychol. (2021) 77:340–55. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Gariepy G, Dore I, Whitehead RD, Elgar FJ. More than just sleeping in: a late timing of sleep is associated with health problems and unhealthy behaviours in adolescents. Sleep Med. (2019) 56:66–72. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2018.10.029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Kivela L, Papadopoulos MR, Antypa N. Chronotype and psychiatric disorders. Curr Sleep Med Rep. (2018) 4:94–103. doi: 10.1007/s40675-018-0113-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Au J, Reece J. The relationship between chronotype and depressive symptoms: a meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. (2017) 218:93–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.04.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Park CI, An SK, Kim HW, Koh MJ, Namkoong K, Kang JI, et al. Relationships between chronotypes and affective temperaments in healthy young adults. J Affect Disord. (2015) 175:256–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.01.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Lemoine P, Zawieja P, Ohayon MM. Associations between morningness/eveningness and psychopathology: an epidemiological survey in three in-patient psychiatric clinics. J Psychiatr Res. (2013) 47:1095–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.04.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Liu S, Wing YK, Hao Y, Li W, Zhang J, Zhang B. The associations of long-time mobile phone use with sleep disturbances and mental distress in technical college students: a prospective cohort study. Sleep. (2019) 42:1–10. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsy213

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Ana A, Helena A. Horne & Östberg morningness-eveningness questionnaire: a reduced scale. Pers Indiv Differ. (1991) 12:241–53. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(91)90110-W

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Li SX, Chan NY, Man YM, Lam SP, Zhang J, Yan CJ, et al. Eveningness chronotype, insomnia symptoms, and emotional and behavioural problems in adolescents. Sleep Med. (2018) 47:93–9. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2018.03.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Weixia L, Aizezi M, Zhitao X, Wuhan L, Bin Z. Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of Morningness/Eveningness Questionnaire-5 items(MEQ-5) in students of technical schools. Chin Mental Health J. (2016) 30:406–12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2016.06.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Morin CM, Belleville G, Belanger L, Ivers H. The insomnia severity index: psychometric indicators to detect insomnia cases and evaluate treatment response. Sleep. (2011) 34:601–8. doi: 10.1093/sleep/34.5.601

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Bastien CH, Vallieres A, Morin CM. Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep Med. (2001) 2:297–307. doi: 10.1016/S1389-9457(00)00065-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Chung KF, Kan KK, Yeung WF. Assessing insomnia in adolescents: comparison of Insomnia Severity Index, Athens Insomnia Scale and Sleep Quality Index. Sleep Med. (2011) 12:463–70. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2010.09.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: The Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep. (1991) 14:540–5. doi: 10.1093/sleep/14.6.540

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Chen NH, Johns MW, Li HY, Chu CC, Liang SC, Shu YH, et al. Validation of a Chinese version of the Epworth sleepiness scale. Qual Life Res. (2002) 11:817–21. doi: 10.1023/a:1020818417949

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Beck AT, Beck RW. Screening depressed patients in family practice. A rapid technic. Postgrad Med. (1972) 52:81–5. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1972.11713319

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Zhang YX WYQM. Reliability and validity of Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) examined in Chinese samples. Chin Ment Health J. (1990) 4:164–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

32. Zung WW. A rating instrument for anxiety disorders. Psychosomatics. (1971) 12:371–9. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(71)71479-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Gong Y, Han T, Chen W, Dib HH, Yang G, Zhuang R, et al. Prevalence of anxiety and depressive symptoms and related risk factors among physicians in China: a cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE. (2014) 9:e103242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103242

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Horne JA, Ostberg O. Individual differences in human circadian rhythms. Biol Psychol. (1977) 5:179–90. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(77)90001-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Urban R, Magyarodi T, Rigo A. Morningness-eveningness, chronotypes and health-impairing behaviors in adolescents. Chronobiol Int. (2011) 28:238–47. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2010.549599

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Glavin EE, Ceneus M, Chanowitz M, Kantilierakis J, Mendelow E, Mosquera J, et al. Relationships between sleep, exercise timing, and chronotype in young adults. J Health Psychol. (2020) 26:2636–47. doi: 10.1177/1359105320926530

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Facer-Childs ER, Campos BM, Middleton B, Skene DJ, Bagshaw AP. Circadian phenotype impacts the brain's resting-state functional connectivity, attentional performance, and sleepiness. Sleep. (2019) 42:zsz033. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsz033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Taillard J, Philip P, Bioulac B. Morningness/eveningness and the need for sleep. J Sleep Res. (1999) 8:291–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2869.1999.00176.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Wittmann M, Dinich J, Merrow M, Roenneberg T. Social jetlag: misalignment of biological and social time. Chronobiol Int. (2006) 23:497–509. doi: 10.1080/07420520500545979

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Paine SJ, Gander PH. Differences in circadian phase and weekday/weekend sleep patterns in a sample of middle-aged morning types and evening types. Chronobiol Int. (2016) 33:1009–17. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2016.1192187

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Ong JC, Huang JS, Kuo TF, Manber R. Characteristics of insomniacs with self-reported morning and evening chronotypes. J Clin Sleep Med. (2007) 3:289–94. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.26801

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Adan A, Fabbri M, Natale V, Prat G. Sleep Beliefs Scale (SBS) and circadian typology. J Sleep Res. (2006) 15:125–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2006.00509.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Lin CY, Imani V, Griffiths MD, Brostrom A, Nygardh A, Demetrovics Z, et al. Temporal associations between morningness/eveningness, problematic social media use, psychological distress and daytime sleepiness: mediated roles of sleep quality and insomnia among young adults. J Sleep Res. (2021) 30:e13076. doi: 10.1111/jsr.13076

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Zhang B, Wing YK. The relationship between sleep need and circadian typology. Guangdong Medical Journal. (2007) 45:11–2. doi: 10.13820/j.cnki.gdyx.2007.01.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Biss RK, Hasher L. Happy as a lark: morning-type younger and older adults are higher in positive affect. Emotion. (2012) 12:437–41. doi: 10.1037/a0027071

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Kitamura S, Hida A, Watanabe M, Enomoto M, Aritake-Okada S, Moriguchi Y, et al. Evening preference is related to the incidence of depressive states independent of sleep-wake conditions. Chronobiol Int. (2010) 27:1797–812. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2010.516705

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Gau SS, Shang CY, Merikangas KR, Chiu YN, Soong WT, Cheng AT. Association between morningness-eveningness and behavioral/emotional problems among adolescents. J Biol Rhythms. (2007) 22:268–74. doi: 10.1177/0748730406298447

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Bakotic M, Radosevic-Vidacek B, Koscec Bjelajac A. Morningness-eveningness and daytime functioning in university students: the mediating role of sleep characteristics. J Sleep Res. (2017) 26:210–8. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12467

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Van den Berg JF, Kivela L, Antypa N. Chronotype and depressive symptoms in students: an investigation of possible mechanisms. Chronobiol Int. (2018) 35:1248–61. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2018.1470531

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Perez S, Murias L, Fernandez-Plaza C, Diaz I, Gonzalez C, Otero J, et al. Evidence for clock genes circadian rhythms in human full-term placenta. Syst Biol Reprod Med. (2015) 61:360–6. doi: 10.3109/19396368.2015.1069420

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Passos GS, Santana MG, Poyares D, D'Aurea CV, Teixeira AA, Tufik S, et al. Chronotype and anxiety are associated in patients with chronic primary insomnia. Braz J Psychiatry. (2017) 39:183–6. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2016-2007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Logan RW, McClung CA. Rhythms of life: circadian disruption and brain disorders across the lifespan. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2019) 20:49–65. doi: 10.1038/s41583-018-0088-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Merikanto I, Partonen T. Eveningness increases risks for depressive and anxiety symptoms and hospital treatments mediated by insufficient sleep in a population-based study of 18,039 adults. Depress Anxiety. (2021) 38:1066–77. doi: 10.1002/da.23189

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Telzer EH, Fuligni AJ, Lieberman MD, Galvan A. The effects of poor quality sleep on brain function and risk taking in adolescence. Neuroimage. (2013) 71:275–83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: chronotype, sleep compensation, insomnia, depression, anxiety

Citation: Wang J, Liu S, Guo J, Xiao R, Yu J, Luo X, Xu Y, Zhao Y, Cui Y, Gu Y, Cai L and Zhang B (2022) Chronotypes, Sleep and Mental Distress Among Chinese College Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. Front. Psychiatry 13:883484. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.883484

Received: 25 February 2022; Accepted: 05 May 2022;
Published: 26 May 2022.

Edited by:

Jamie Zeitzer, Stanford University, United States

Reviewed by:

Lorenzo Tonetti, University of Bologna, Italy
Xiangdong Tang, Sichuan University, China

Copyright © 2022 Wang, Liu, Guo, Xiao, Yu, Luo, Xu, Zhao, Cui, Gu, Cai and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Bin Zhang, zhang73bin@hotmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.