Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry, 16 May 2022
Sec. Mood Disorders
This article is part of the Research Topic Insights in Mood and Anxiety Disorders: 2021 View all 18 articles

The Influence of Self-Esteem and Psychological Flexibility on Medical College Students' Mental Health: A Cross-Sectional Study

\nJiamei Guo&#x;Jiamei Guo1Xin Huang&#x;Xin Huang2Anhai ZhengAnhai Zheng1Wanjun ChenWanjun Chen1Zhongli LeiZhongli Lei1Chenglu TangChenglu Tang1Hongyu ChenHongyu Chen1Hongyan MaHongyan Ma1Xuemei Li
Xuemei Li1*
  • 1Department of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
  • 2Department of Psychology, Hunan University of Medicine, Hunan, China

Background: Mental health problems has become a major public health issue among medical students. Self-esteem and psychological flexibility were important associated factors for mental health, but their relations have not been discussed in medical students. The present study aimed to assess the status of mental health problems among medical students and identified whether psychological flexibility had a mediating role in the effects of self-esteem on the top three most common psychological symptoms.

Methods: A total of 810 undergraduate students from 18 classes comprised in the sample. Nine dimensions of psychological symptoms was assessed by the Symptom Checklist-90-revised (SCL-90-R). Self-esteem was measured by the Self-esteem Scale (SES) and psychological flexibility was evaluated by the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire 2nd Edition (AAQ-II) and Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ-F). Univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis were used to determine the relationship among the top three common psychological symptoms, self-esteem, psychological flexibility, and participants' characteristics. The mediating effect of psychological flexibility between self-esteem and psychological symptoms was detected by bootstrap method.

Results: 57.8% of the medical undergraduate students reported positive at least one of the nine psychological symptom dimensions assessed by the SCL-90-R and 13.8% of students had moderate or more severe symptoms. The symptoms of obsessive-compulsiveness, interpersonal sensitivity, and depression were the three most common psychological symptoms among the medical students. Meanwhile, self-esteem and psychological flexibility were negatively associated to the symptoms of obsessive-compulsiveness, interpersonal sensitivity, and depression. And, almost 50% effects of self-esteem on these three symptoms in medical students exert indirect effects through psychological flexibility.

Conclusions: Psychological distress was quite common in the Chinese medical students. The three most common psychological symptoms were successively obsessive-compulsiveness, interpersonal sensitivity, and depression. Low self-esteem and psychological inflexibility might be the risk factors for these top three symptoms, and psychological flexibility might play a mediating role in the effects of self-esteem on these psychological symptoms.

Introduction

Mental health is an essential component of health (1). Yet, mental health problems have become a major public health issue worldwide due to its increasing prevalence and great burden to their own families or the society (2, 3). Most mental health problems arise in early adulthood. However, young adults rarely receive any treatment or support from professionals (4). It is reported that college students are facing greater mental health challenges than general population due to high expectations of families and society (5, 6). Worldwide, it is estimated that 12%−50% of college students present at least one diagnostic criterion for one or more mental disorders (7). And even more, medical students are at a higher rate of mental health problems than non-medical undergraduates, such as anxiety, depression, stress, suicide and so on (8). These problems might lead to a range of adverse effects, such as poor academic performance, bad relationships with peers, and increasing risk of suicide and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) behavior (9, 10). Moreover, they might also potentially increase the incidence of drug abuse, medical errors, and unethical behavior after graduation (11). Therefore, early identification and management of psychological distress may be critical for long-term knowledge accumulation and development of medical students as future health care professionals.

Studies have suggested that self-esteem plays an important role in mental health (12). Self-esteem is an overall self-evaluation of an individual's worth and ability, strongly affected by social feedback from parents, teachers, and peers (13). It influences interactions and feelings toward oneself and others. Strong evidence shows that low self-esteem is a non-specific risk factor for mental health, such as anxiety, depression, stress or aggression (14). Choi et al. (15) suggested that different levels of self-esteem was related to the development of depression, and also related the social support. Meanwhile, Self-esteem is also associated to substance abuse, suicidal ideation, suicidal attempted, and other mental health conditions (16, 17). Therefore, improving the level of self-esteem is helpful to promote the mental health for young adults.

Psychological flexibility, a fundamental aspect of health (18), is the central construction of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) proposed by Hayes et al. (19). Psychological flexibility is defined as an individual's “ability to contact with the present environment and internal psychological activities, to persist or change in behavior when doing so serves valued ends, and to tolerate, accept, or overcome interference (19). Empirical avoidance and cognitive fusion are the features of psychological inflexibility. Experiential avoidance refers to an unwillingness to maintain contact with unwanted experiences and acting to avoid them (20), and cognitive fusion refers to the tendency for behavior to be over-regulated and affected by cognition (21). Psychological flexibility has been found to be closely associated with psychopathology and wellbeing (22). Apart for that, psychological flexibility also mediate the development of mental disorders. Over the past two decades, ACT have gained a amount of attention in clinical psychotherapy and was widely used in the treatment of anxiety, depression, chronic physical pain, and so on (2325). The core treatment target in ACT is to promote psychological flexibility. A high level of psychological flexibility can enhance a positive evaluation of oneself, feelings of continuous growth and development, purposeful and meaningful beliefs in life, and satisfaction with one's relationship (26). To some extent, these are all closely related to self-esteem. Hence, we speculated that the level of self-esteem may be improved by an increased psychological flexibility.

As mentioned above, both self-esteem and psychological flexibility are important related factors for mental health. However, so far, no studies have been reported on the relations between self-esteem, psychological flexibility, and mental health problems. Self-esteem, as a central part of human personality, whether it can modulate mental health by mediating psychological flexibility is unknown. So, in the study, we would explore the link between self-esteem, psychological flexibility, and mental health problems, and further confirm whether psychological flexibility had a mediating effect between self-esteem and mental health. Although, there have been some studies on the prevalence of and risk factors for mental health problems among medical students (27, 28), but little is known about the role of psychological flexibility on the mental health problems in this specific group. Secondly, most studies focused on the incidence of depression, anxiety, stress and their related factors, and little attention was paid to other psychological symptoms. Therefore, our study would also clarify the status of psychological symptoms among medical students, and analyze the related risk factors for the top three psychological symptoms respectively. Our findings might be helpful to provide valuable information for mental health services in medical student.

Methods

Subjects and Study Design

A Cross-sectional study was conducted in Chongqing, a major city in southwest China during June 1 to December 31, 2019. Participants were medical students from Chongqing medical university. A stratified cluster sampling method was used to draw a 25% sample of undergraduate students in the university. All the students in the chosen class were enrolled into the study. With this sampling procedure, a total of 810 medical university students from 18 classes comprised the study population. All the subjects were informed about the purpose of the study, the confidentiality of personal information, the principle of volunteering and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants before evaluation. Study protocols were approved by the ethics committee of Chongqing Medical University, China.

Measurement Process

Data collection was conducted by two trained members of the research group. Before the assessments, the testers introduced the purpose and significance of the survey and declared the principle of confidentiality to all the participants. After obtaining the students' informed consent, questionnaires were distributed centrally and unified instructions were informed. The participants answered the questionnaires independently and anonymously. During the assessments, the testers were always on the spot to answer any questions raised by the participants. The answer time for the questionnaires was within 30 min. Psychological assessments were composed of four parts: demographics, self-esteem assessments, psychological distress, and psychological flexibility. Before assessing each scale, identified instructions were provided.

Measures

Demographics

General information covered age, gender, grades, registered residence (urban or rural), relationship with roommates (good, not bad, bad), being the only child or not, being a poor student or not, joining the student clubs or not.

Symptom Checklist-90-Revised Scale (SCL-90-R)

Psychological symptoms of study participants were assessed using the Chinese version of the Symptom Checklist-90-revised (SCL-90-R), which was widely used in mental health screening (29). The scale has a total of 90 items and is divided into nine dimensions for evaluating participants' self-reported psychopathological symptoms, including somatization, obsessive-compulsiveness, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism. Each item is scored using a 5-point Likert-type scale according to the severity to which the subjects had suffered from the item in the last week (0 = “not at all”, 1 = “a little bit”, 2 = “moderately”, 3= “quite a bit”, 4 = “extremely”). Higher scores indicate a greater severity of psychiatric symptoms. The scores of the nine subscales were categorized as follows: average score <1 were classified as “normal”; 1 ≤ average score < 2 were classified as “mild”; and average score ≥2 were classified as “moderate or high”. In the present study, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient for this scale was 0.975 and ranged from 0.746 (paranoid ideation) to 0.904 (depression) across the nine subscales.

Self-Esteem Scale

Self-esteem Scale (SES) was compiled by Rosenberg in 1965. The Chinese version of self-esteem scale was used to measure the self-esteem levels (30). It consists of 10- item self-reported questionnaire with a 4-point scale. The questions are about participants' overall feelings of self-worth and self-acceptance. The total scores range from 10 to 40, with the higher scores indicating higher self-esteem. In this survey, the Cronbach coefficient of the scale in the present research was 0.836.

Psychological Flexibility Assessments

Psychological flexibility was assessed via the Chinese version of Acceptance and Action Questionnaire 2nd Edition (AAQ-II) and Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ-F). AAQ-II was used to assess experiential avoidance using a 7-item self-reported questionnaire with a 7-point scale (31). The total scores range from 7 to 49, with the higher scores indicating greater psychological inflexibility. CFQ-F was used to measure cognitive fusion using a 9-items self-reported questionnaire with a 7-point scale (32). The total scores range from 9 to 63, with the higher scores indicating higher psychological inflexibility. In this study, the Cronbach coefficient of the AAQ-II and CFQ-F questionnaires were 0.883 and 0.946, respectively.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed in IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0. Descriptive statistics was applied to the study variables and general characteristics. Univariate analyses were used to identify any relations between sociodemographic characteristics, self-esteem, psychological flexibility and the psychological symptoms. Additionally, linear regressions analysis was constructed to analyze the relationship between psychological symptoms and self-esteem and psychological flexibility. Bootstrap procedure was used to explore the mediating effects of psychological flexibility on the self-esteem and psychological symptoms. P (two-tailed) < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

In total, 810 questionnaires were distributed to medical students, and 788 valid questionnaires were used for the next analysis. Hence, the effective rate of valid data received for the present analysis was 97.28%. The participants were aged between 17 and 24 years, with an average age of 19.93 (SD = 1.27), and 60.7% of the participants were female. Among them, the proportions of freshmen, sophomores, and juniors 33.9, 34.1, and 32.0%, respectively. Most participants were rural residents (n = 537; 68.1%), and had one or more siblings (n = 607; 77%). 81.9% of the participants had a good relationship with their roommates, and only 13.2 of participants were poor students (Table 1).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The study sample description (N = 788).

Of our participants, 50.5% had symptoms of obsessive-compulsiveness (8.5% with moderate or more severe), 38.1% had symptoms of interpersonal sensitivity (6.9% with moderate or more severe), 26.6% had symptoms of depression (5.7% with moderate or more severe), and 21.6% had symptoms of anxiety (3.3% with moderate or more severe). These psychological symptoms were more common in the medical students. The prevalence of other psychological symptoms is shown in Table 2, such as symptoms of hostility, somatization, phobia, paranoid, and psychoticism. Besides, 57.8% of participants reported positive at least one dimension of symptoms (13.8% with moderate or more severe).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Distribution of SCL-90-R.

Table 3 shows that experiential avoidance and cognitive fusion were positively correlated with the symptoms of obsessive-compulsiveness, interpersonal sensitivity, and depression (P < 0.001), and self-esteem was negatively correlated with these three symptoms (P < 0.001). Table 3 also shows that age, sex, grades and relationships with roommates were related with symptoms of obsessive-compulsiveness and depression (P < 0.05). Additionally, joining a student club was associated with symptoms of depression (P = 0.044). But, we only observed grades (P = 0.028) and relationships with roommates (P < 0.001) was related with the symptoms of interpersonal sensitivity.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Factors influencing obsessive-compulsiveness, interpersonal sensitivity, and depression symptoms (mean ± SD).

Linear regression analysis further showed the self-esteem was negatively associated with the symptoms of obsessive-compulsiveness (B = −0.024, β = −0.163, P < 0.001), interpersonal sensitivity (B = −0.034, β = −0.234, P < 0.001) and depression (B = −0.043, β = −0.292, P < 0.001). Table 4 also shows that cognitive fusion and empirical avoidance were positively related with the symptoms of obsessive-compulsiveness (B = 0.013, β = 0.25, P < 0.001; B = 0.025, β = 0.32, P < 0.001), interpersonal sensitivity (B = 0.01, β = 0.195, P < 0.001; B = 0.027, β = 0.348, P < 0.001) and depression (B = 0.01, β = 0.188, P < 0.001; B = 0.025, β = 0.324, P < 0.001) after adjusted for age, sex, grades, roommate relationship, family economic status.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Linear regression of SES and psychological flexibility for the top three most common symptoms.

In order to further understand the relationship among self-esteem, psychological flexibility and the top three psychological symptoms in the medical students, we explored whether psychological flexibility has a mediating effect between self-esteem and these three psychological symptoms. First, the predictive variables were standardized. The scores of obsessive-compulsiveness, interpersonal sensitivity, and depression were chosen as the dependent variable, respectively. The scores of SES scores were chosen as the predictive variable. Meanwhile, AQQ-II scores and CFQ-F scores were chosen as the mediating variable to conduct the mediation effect test, and Bootstrap self-sampling times were set as 5,000. The mediating role of psychological flexibility in the effects of self-esteem on the symptoms of compulsive symptoms, obsessive-compulsiveness, and interpersonal sensitivity was −0.286 (experiential avoidance −0.173; cognitive fusion −0.113), −0.278 (experiential avoidance −0.193; cognitive fusion −0.085), and −0.265 (experiential avoidance −0.183; cognitive fusion −0.082), respectively. The proportion of mediation effects ranged from 45.14 to 61.36%, and experience avoidance accounted for a higher proportion of mediation effects compared with cognitive fusion (Table 5).

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Mediation effect of psychological flexibility on self-esteem and the top three most common symptoms.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this was the first study to estimate the relationship among self-esteem, psychological flexibility, and mental health in a sample of Chinese medical students. SCL-90 is one of the most famous mental health scales for mental disorders screening in the world (33). This scale is mainly used to assess whether a person has psychological symptoms and its severity, and it has a good discriminatory ability for people with psychological symptoms (34). In our study, we found that psychological distress was a serious problem among Chinese medical students, with 57.8% of medical students reported positive of psychological symptoms, including 44% reporting mild and 13.8% reporting moderate or more severe psychological distress in at least one dimension assessed by SCL-90-R. Our findings indicated that a significant proportion of medical students are experiencing a variety of psychiatric symptoms, which was consistent with previous reported domestic and foreign studies. For example, Yang et al. (27) reported that 24.45% of medical students in southeast China might have mental health problems according to the total score of SCL-90 (≥160). Tang et al. showed that 40.7% of the university students screened positive for at least one of the nine psychological symptom dimensions assessed by the SCL-90-R (35). Shao et al. (3) used Zung self-rating depression scale and Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale to evaluate the depression and anxiety symptoms among Chinese medical students, and found that 57.5 and 30.8% of students might be experiencing the symptoms of depression and anxiety, respectively. Meanwhile, foreign researches also find that medical students have a high prevalence of mental health problems, and multiple countries have proposed it is time to act mental health services for medical students (36). Such as a study from Brazilian reported that 34.6% of medical students had depressive symptoms, 37.2% showed anxiety symptoms, and 47.1% had stress (37). Another study from Nigeria showed that 25.2% of the medical students had psychological distress, depression in 33.5%, anxiety in 28.8%, and psychoactive substance in up to 44.2% (38). However, we also noticed that there were some inconsistencies in the reported prevalence rates. These discrepancies might be partly explained by the unbalanced economic development between different regions, different cultures, varied screening methods and different population.

Our present study also found that obsessive-compulsive symptoms were most prevalent among medical students, followed by interpersonal sensitivity and depression. This finding was consistent with previous study reported by Yang (22) using the same scale (SCL-90) to assess the mental health of medical students in Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China. However, Yang's study just simply reported the prevalence of the psychological symptoms (22). They didn't examine the associated factors for the three top psychological symptoms, respectively. To our knowledge, this was the first study to examine the related factors of the three most common psychological symptoms among medical students. Previous studies have also shown that these three psychiatric symptoms seriously affect the mental health of medical students. For example, Esan et al. reported that 51.4% were aware of obsessive-compulsive disorder based on Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale(Y-BOCS) among 1,172 medical students (39). Another cross-sectional study with 471 Brazilian medical students found that possible obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) identified by Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised score >27 among medical students is more common (40). Moreover, obsessive-compulsive symptoms were also relevant to suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms among medical students (41). Interpersonal sensitivity is a type of personality trait, characterized by over-awareness of the actions and feelings of others and sensitivity to perceived criticism or rejection (42). Individuals with this trait have a sense of discomfort and inferiority in interpersonal communication, which leads the individuals to often avoid social interactions (43). Interpersonal sensitivity plays an important role in human mental health, and it has some negative impact on individual mental health and social adaptive functions (44). Additionally, it is also a susceptibility factor for many mental disorders such as depression, anxiety, paranoia, and compulsion (45, 46). Thus, obsessive-compulsiveness and interpersonal sensitivity are negligible mental health problems among medical students. Unfortunately, the current domestic and foreign researches on the mental health mainly focused on professional burnout, depression, suicide and anxiety (47). The attention paid to obsessive-compulsiveness and interpersonal sensitivity is still insufficient. Therefore, comprehensive assessment of individual mental health might be more conducive to meet the requirements of WHO for mental health. We considered that screening and intervention for the symptoms of obsessive-compulsive and interpersonal sensitivity should be emphasized in the studies and mental health care among medical students.

In addition, the present study also found a negative association all existed between self-esteem and obsessive-compulsiveness, interpersonal sensitivity, or depression. It means that low self-esteem was a risk factor for these three psychological symptoms. Self-esteem is the positive affirmation and acceptance of self-worth (48). Good self-esteem helps individual maintaining psychological balance and avoiding the psychological response caused by the pressure. Our results are consistent to the previous studies. A large number of studies showing that low self-esteem increases the risk of mental health problem, such as depression, anxiety (14, 49). In addition, low self-esteem was reported to be a risk factor for OCD, and enhancing self-esteem could significantly reduces OCD symptoms (50). Meanwhile, self-esteem played a mediating role in the relationship between left-behind experience and obsessive-compulsive symptoms (51). Too weak self-esteem is called inferiority, which would affect the self-evaluation, reduce social interaction, and increase interpersonal sensitivity (43). In the present study, we also found that low self-esteem increased the symptoms of interpersonal sensitivity, which are closely related to interpersonal relationships and social support. There are some evidence shows that low self-esteem is associated with interpersonal sensitivity. For example, Zavala et al. (52) reported that collective narcissism, a high but contradictory form of group self-esteem was associated with threats to group image and sensitivity to retaliatory aggression. And, Preti et al. (53) also found self-esteem was related to interpersonal relationships. Strong evidence shows that interpersonal relationships and social support are closely related to mental health (54). Good interpersonal relationships and social support reduce the incidence of mental health problems, otherwise increase the risk. A recent review reported by Gilligan et al. (55) concluded that the interventions on improving interpersonal communication skills among medical students had positive effects on most outcomes in most studies.

Moreover, we also found cognitive fusion and empirical avoidance are positively associated with obsessive-compulsiveness, interpersonal sensitivity, or depression. That means psychological flexibility was a protective factor for these three psychological symptoms. Studies have shown that the levels of cognitive fusion and empirical avoidance in patients with depression are higher than in health control group, and both psychological inflexibility are positively associated with depression level (56). Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is a psychological intervention that aims at increasing psychological flexibility (22). Extensive evidence shows that ACT can improve depression, stress, and physical pain (2325). Some studies shows that ACT can reduce OCD symptoms (57). Such as a randomized controlled trial study reported that SSRI combined with ACT treatment showed a greater decrease in the severity of OCD, compared with OCD patients with SSRI alone (58). However, researches on the relationship of ACT or psychological flexibility and interpersonal sensitivity are very lack. Oró et al. found mindfulness-based programme could significantly improve the symptoms of compulsion, interpersonal sensitivity of medical students (59). Our study might be the first study to report that interpersonal sensitivity was positively associated with psychological inflexibility. We speculated that enhancing the psychological flexibility by ACT or mindfulness would be helpful to reduce the symptoms of interpersonal sensitivity and increase social interaction.

The bootstrap method further showed that psychological flexibility played a partial mediating role between the self-esteem and the three most common psychological symptoms among medical students. The proportion of indirect effects fluctuated from 45.14 to 61.36%, which means that approximately 50% effects of self-esteem on the three most common psychological symptoms exert indirect effects through psychological flexibility. Empirical avoidance accounted for a higher proportion of indirect effects compared with cognitive fusion. Individuals with good self-esteem are more likely to recognize their abilities, objectively evaluate their value, and actively seek resources and methods to resist negative factors in the face of failure (60). However, the individuals with low self-esteem are prone to fall into rumination, become self-derogatory, and avoid solving problems when faced with pressure or conflicts (61). These manifestations are associated with psychological flexibility and psychological inflexibility, respectively (62). Similarly, according to the ACT treatment model, improving the level of the openness and acceptance might also improve the level of self-efficacy, which is positively associated with self-esteem (63). These theories support the finding that psychological flexibility might be a mediator between self-esteem and mental health. Therefore, we speculated that ACT intervention might be one of the effective methods to reduce the impact of low self-esteem on the mental health among medical students.

There were some limitations in the present study. Firstly, this study just used experiential avoidance and cognitive fusion to assess psychological flexibility. Future studies might use multidimensional measurement tools to comprehensively reflect the psychological flexibility of participants. Secondly, the participants enrolled in the study were from the same medical university. Thus, our finding might be more likely to reflect the prevalence of psychiatric symptoms among medical students in a region. Last, the study was a cross-sectional survey, so the causal relationship between variables could not be proven. Therefore, longitudinal follow-up study could be performed to verify the mediating effect of psychological flexibility on self-esteem and the symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder, interpersonal sensitivity and depression in the following studies.

Conclusion

We found medical students displayed a considerable prevalence of psychopathological symptoms. Among the nine dimensions of psychological symptoms assessed by SCL-90-R, obsessive-compulsive was most prevalent, followed by interpersonal sensitivity and depression in the medical students. In addition, we identified a number of factors associated with the top three symptoms, factors including age, sex, grades, roommate relationship, family economic status, self-esteem, experiential avoidance and cognitive fusion. Furthermore, we found that psychological flexibility is a mediator in the relationship between self-esteem and mental health. We argue it is time to comprehensive identification of the mental health problems among medical students, followed by assessment-based psychological interventions to promote mental health.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics Statement

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (2019-270). The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

JG and XH analyzing the data and writing the paper. AZ helping modifying the paper. WC helping designing the questionnaire. ZL, CT, HC, and HM helping collecting the data. XL: conceived and designed the experiments; fund provider; writing—review. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by Teaching Research Project of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CMER201803), the Humanities and Social Sciences General Project of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (17SKG023), the Chongqing Science and Health Joint Medical Scientific Research Project (2020MSXM079) and Teaching Reform Project of Hunan University of Medicine (2021JG23).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the medical students for attending the evaluation of mental health.

Abbreviations

SCL-90-R, Symptom Checklist-90-revised; SES, Self-esteem Scale; AAQ-II, Acceptance and Action Questionnaire 2nd Edition; CFQ-F, Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire; ACT, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy; NSSI, non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI); Y-BOCS, Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale(Y-BOCS); OCD, obsessive-compulsive disorder.

References

1. Saxena S, Funk M, Chisholm D. WHO's Mental Health Action Plan 2013-2020: what can psychiatrists do to facilitate its implementation? World Psychiatry. (2014) 13:107–9. doi: 10.1002/wps.20141

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. (2018) 392:1789–858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Shao R, He P, Ling B, Tan L, Xu L, Hou Y, et al. Prevalence of depression and anxiety and correlations between depression, anxiety, family functioning, social support and coping styles among Chinese medical students. BMC Psychol. (2020) 8:38. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-00402-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Sarokhani D, Delpisheh A, Veisani Y, Sarokhani MT, Manesh RE, Sayehmiri K. Prevalence of depression among university students: a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Depress Res Treat. (2013) 2013:373857. doi: 10.1155/2013/373857

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Brenneisen Mayer F, Souza Santos I, Silveira PS, Itaqui Lopes MH, de Souza AR, Campos EP, et al. Factors associated to depression and anxiety in medical students: a multicenter study. BMC Med Educ. (2016) 16:282. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0791-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Ramón-Arbués E, Gea-Caballero V, Granada-López JM, Juárez-Vela R, Pellicer-García B, Antón-Solanas I. The prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress and their associated factors in college students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:7001. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Bruffaerts R, Mortier P, Kiekens G, Auerbach RP, Cuijpers P, Demyttenaere K, et al. Mental health problems in college freshmen: prevalence and academic functioning. J Affect Disord. (2018) 225:97–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.07.044

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Mirza AA, Milaat WA, Ramadan IK, Baig M, Elmorsy SA, Beyari GM, et al. Depression, anxiety and stress among medical and non-medical students in Saudi Arabia: an epidemiological comparative cross-sectional study. Neurosciences. (2021) 26:141–51. doi: 10.17712/nsj.2021.2.20200127

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Waechter R, Stahl G, Rabie S, Colak B, Johnson-Rais D, Landon B, et al. Mitigating medical student stress and anxiety: should schools mandate participation in wellness intervention programs? Med Teacher. (2021) 43:945–55. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1902966

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Wilkes C, Lewis T, Brager N, Bulloch A, MacMaster F, Paget M, et al. Wellbeing and mental health amongst medical students in Canada. Int Rev Psychiatry. (2019) 31:584–7. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2019.1675927

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Dalbudak E, Evren C, Topcu M, Aldemir S, Coskun KS, Bozkurt M, et al. Relationship of Internet addiction with impulsivity and severity of psychopathology among Turkish university students. Psychiatry Res. (2013) 210:1086–91. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.08.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. van der Cruijsen R, Boyer BE. Explicit and implicit self-esteem in youth with autism spectrum disorders. Autism. (2021) 25:349–60. doi: 10.1177/1362361320961006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Du H, King RB, Chi P. Self-esteem and subjective well-being revisited: the roles of personal, relational, and collective self-esteem. PloS ONE. (2017) 12:e0183958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183958

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. van Tuijl LA, Bennik EC, Penninx BWJH, Spinhoven P, de Jong PJ. Predictive value of implicit and explicit self-esteem for the recurrence of depression and anxiety disorders: a 3-year follow-up study. J Abnorm Psychol. (2020) 129:788–98. doi: 10.1037/abn0000634

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Choi Y, Choi SH, Yun JY, Lim JA, Kwon Y, Lee HY, et al. The relationship between levels of self-esteem and the development of depression in young adults with mild depressive symptoms. Medicine. (2019) 98:e17518. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017518

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Lannoy S, Mange J, Leconte P, Ritz L, Gierski F, Maurage P, et al. Distinct psychological profiles among college students with substance use: a cluster analytic approach. Addict Behav. (2020) 109:106477. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106477

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Huang YH, Liu HC, Tsai FJ, Sun FJ, Huang KY, Chiu YC, et al. Correlation of impulsivity with self-harm and suicidal attempt: a community study of adolescents in Taiwan. BMJ Open. (2017) 7:e017949. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017949

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Kashdan TB, Rottenberg J. Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clin Psychol Rev. (2010) 30:865–78. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Hayes S, Villatte M, Levin M, Hildebrandt M. Open, aware, and active: contextual approaches as an emerging trend in the behavioral and cognitive therapies. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. (2011) 7:141–168. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032210-104449

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Rochefort C, Baldwin AS, Chmielewski M. Experiential avoidance: an examination of the construct validity of the AAQ-II and MEAQ. Behav Ther. (2018) 49:435–49. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2017.08.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Gillanders DT, Bolderston H, Bond FW, Dempster M, Flaxman PE, Campbell L, et al. The development and initial validation of the cognitive fusion questionnaire. Behav Ther. (2014) 45:83–101. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.09.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Bond FW, Hayes SC, Barnes-Holmes D. Psychological flexibility, ACT, and organizational behavior. J Organ Behav Manage. (2006) 26:25–54. doi: 10.1300/J075v26n01_02

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Wynne B, McHugh L, Gao W, Keegan D, Byrne K, Rowan C, et al. Acceptance and commitment therapy reduces psychological stress in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. (2019) 156:935–45.e931. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.11.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Yu L, Kioskli K, McCracken LM. The psychological functioning in the COVID-19 pandemic and its association with psychological flexibility and broader functioning in people with chronic pain. J Pain. (2021) 22:926–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.02.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Fledderus M, Bohlmeijer ET, Pieterse ME, Schreurs KM. Acceptance and commitment therapy as guided self-help for psychological distress and positive mental health: a randomized controlled trial. Psychol Med. (2012) 42:485–95. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711001206

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Fava GA, Guidi J. The pursuit of euthymia. World Psychiatry. (2020) 19:40–50. doi: 10.1002/wps.20698

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Yang F, Meng H, Chen H, Xu XH, Liu Z, Luo A, et al. Influencing factors of mental health of medical students in China. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. (2014) 34:443–9. doi: 10.1007/s11596-014-1298-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Mirza AA, Baig M, Beyari GM, Halawani MA, Mirza AA. Depression and anxiety among medical students: a brief overview. Adv Med Educ Pract. (2021) 12:393–8. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S302897

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Leichsenring F, Jaeger U, Masuhr O, Dally A, Dümpelmann M, Fricke-Neef C, et al. To be or not to be improved: patients' perception of symptom improvement - linking the SCL-90-R to patient-rated global improvement in a large real-world treatment sample. Psychother Psychosom. (2020) 89:357–62. doi: 10.1159/000509213

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Zhang H, Tong T, Gao Y, Liang C, Yu H, Li S, et al. Translation of the Chinese version of the modified Yale Food Addiction Scale 20 and its validation among college students. J Eat Disord. (2021) 9:116. doi: 10.1186/s40337-021-00471-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Yang Y, Liu Y, Xiao Y, Zhang L, Li Y, Zhu H, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Chinese version of the acceptance and action questionnaire-adult hearing loss. Int J Audiol. (2021) 1−6. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.2002954

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Hu Z, Yu H, Zou J, Zhang Y, Lu Z, Hu M. Relationship among self-injury, experiential avoidance, cognitive fusion, anxiety, and depression in Chinese adolescent patients with nonsuicidal self-injury. Brain Behav. (2021) 11:e2419. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2419

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Judd LL, Schettler PJ, Rush AJ. A brief clinical tool to estimate individual patients' risk of depressive relapse following remission: proof of concept. Am J Psychiatry. (2016) 173:1140–6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15111462

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Vallejo MA, Jordán CM, Díaz MI, Comeche MI, Ortega J. Psychological assessment via the internet: a reliability and validity study of online (vs paper-and-pencil) versions of the General Health Questionnaire-28 (GHQ-28) and the Symptoms Check-List-90-Revised (SCL-90-R). J Med Internet Res. (2007) 9:e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.1.e2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Tang F, Byrne M, Qin P. Psychological distress and risk for suicidal behavior among university students in contemporary China. J Affect Disord. (2018) 228:101–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.12.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Karp JF, Levine AS. Mental health services for medical students - time to act. N Engl J Med. (2018) 379:1196–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1803970

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Moutinho IL, Maddalena NC, Roland RK, Lucchetti AL, Tibiriçá SH, Ezequiel OD, et al. Depression, stress and anxiety in medical students: a cross-sectional comparison between students from different semesters. Rev Assoc Med Bras. (2017) 63:21–8. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.63.01.21

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Esan O, Esan A, Folasire A, Oluwajulugbe P. Mental health and wellbeing of medical students in Nigeria: a systematic review. Int Rev Psychiatry. (2019) 31:661–72. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2019.1677220

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Asghar MA, Rehman AA, Shafiq Y, Siddiq A, Zehravi M, Khan K, et al. Relationship of obsessive-compulsive disorders with religion and psychosocial attitude among local medical college students of Karachi: an epidemiological study. J Pak Med Assoc. (2020) 70:1563–7. doi: 10.5455/JPMA.34245

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Torres AR, Cruz BL, Vicentini HC, Lima MC, Ramos-Cerqueira AT. Obsessive-compulsive symptoms in medical students: prevalence, severity, and correlates. Acad Psychiatry. (2016) 40:46–54. doi: 10.1007/s40596-015-0357-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Torres AR, Campos LM, Lima MCP, Ramos-Cerqueira ATA. Suicidal ideation among medical students: prevalence and predictors. J Nerv Ment Dis. (2018) 206:160–8. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000734

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Boyce P, Parker G, Barnett B, Cooney M, Smith F. Personality as a vulnerability factor to depression. Br J Psychiatry. (1991) 159:106–14. doi: 10.1192/bjp.159.1.106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Meisel SF, Garety PA, Stahl D, Valmaggia LR. Interpersonal processes in paranoia: a systematic review. Psychol Med. (2018) 48:2299–312. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718000491

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Sun J, Zhang X, Wang Y, Wang J, Li J, Cao F. The associations of interpersonal sensitivity with mental distress and trait aggression in early adulthood: a prospective cohort study. J Affect Disord. (2020) 272:50–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.161

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Otani K, Suzuki A, Matsumoto Y, Shirata T. Close relation of interpersonal sensitivity with negative core beliefs about the self, the central construct of cognitive vulnerability to depression. Psychiatry Res. (2018) 263:162–5. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Yilmaz T, Bekaroglu E. Does interpersonal sensitivity and paranoid ideation predict nomophobia: an analysis with a young adult sample. Curr Psychol. (2021) 41:1–7. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01501-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Massie FS, Power DV, Eacker A, Harper W, et al. Burnout and suicidal ideation among US medical students. Ann Intern Med. (2008) 149:334–41. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-5-200809020-00008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Meisenhelder JB. Self-esteem: a closer look at clinical interventions. Int J Nurs Stud. (1985) 22:127–35. doi: 10.1016/0020-7489(85)90023-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Kim B, Roh H. Depressive symptoms in medical students: prevalence and related factors. Korean J Med Educ. (2014) 26:53–8. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2014.26.1.53

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Schwartz C, Hilbert S, Schubert C, Schlegl S, Freyer T, Löwe B, et al. Change factors in the process of cognitive-behavioural therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Clin Psychol Psychother. (2017) 24:785–92. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Liu W, Li J, Huang Y, Yu B, Qin R, Cao X. The relationship between left-behind experience and obsessive-compulsive symptoms in college students in China: the mediation effect of self-esteem. Psychol Health Med. (2020) 26:644–55. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2020.1748667

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. de Zavala AG, Cichocka A, Eidelson R, Jayawickreme N. Collective narcissism and its social consequences. J Pers Soc Psychol. (2009) 97:1074–96. doi: 10.1037/a0016904

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Preti E, Casini E, Richetin J, De Panfilis C, Fontana A. Cognitive and emotional components of rejection sensitivity: independent contributions to adolescent self- and interpersonal functioning. Assessment. (2020) 27:1230–41. doi: 10.1177/1073191118817866

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Li J, Li J, Jia R, Wang Y, Qian S, Xu Y. Mental health problems and associated school interpersonal relationships among adolescents in China: a cross-sectional study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. (2020) 14:12. doi: 10.1186/s13034-020-00318-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Gilligan C, Powell M, Lynagh MC, Ward BM, Lonsdale C, Harvey P, et al. Interventions for improving medical students' interpersonal communication in medical consultations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2021) 2:CD012418. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012418.pub2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Cookson C, Luzon O, Newland J, Kingston J. Examining the role of cognitive fusion and experiential avoidance in predicting anxiety and depression. Psychol Psychother. (2020) 93:456–73. doi: 10.1111/papt.12233

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Thompson BL, Twohig MP, Luoma JB. Psychological flexibility as shared process of change in acceptance and commitment therapy and exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a single case design study. Behav Ther. (2021) 52:286–97. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2020.04.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Zemestani M, Salavati M, Seyedolshohadayi A, Petersen JM, Ong CW, Twohig MP, et al. A preliminary examination of acceptance and commitment therapy versus exposure and response prevention for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder on an optimal dose of SSRIs: a randomized controlled trial in Iran. Behav Modif. (2020):145445520982977. doi: 10.1177/0145445520982977

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Oró P, Esquerda M, Mas B, Viñas J, Yuguero O, Pifarré J. Effectiveness of a mindfulness-based programme on perceived stress, psychopathological symptomatology and burnout in medical students. Mindfulness. (2021) 12:1138–47. doi: 10.1007/s12671-020-01582-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Piekarska J. Determinants of perceived stress in adolescence: the role of personality traits, emotional abilities, trait emotional intelligence, self-efficacy, and self-esteem. Adv Cogn Psychol. (2020) 16:309–20. doi: 10.5709/acp-0305-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Sassaroli S, Gallucci M, Ruggiero GM. Low perception of control as a cognitive factor of eating disorders. Its independent effects on measures of eating disorders and its interactive effects with perfectionism and self-esteem. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. (2008) 39:467–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2007.11.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Yasinski C, Hayes AM, Ready CB, Abel A, Görg N, Kuyken W. Processes of change in cognitive behavioral therapy for treatment-resistant depression: psychological flexibility, rumination, avoidance, and emotional processing. Psychother Res. (2020) 30:983–97. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2019.1699972

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Godrich SL, Loewen OK, Blanchet R, Willows N, Veugelers P. Canadian children from food insecure households experience low self-esteem and self-efficacy for healthy lifestyle choices. Nutrients. (2019) 11:675. doi: 10.3390/nu11030675

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: self-esteem, psychological flexibility, mental health, empirical avoidance, cognitive fusion

Citation: Guo J, Huang X, Zheng A, Chen W, Lei Z, Tang C, Chen H, Ma H and Li X (2022) The Influence of Self-Esteem and Psychological Flexibility on Medical College Students' Mental Health: A Cross-Sectional Study. Front. Psychiatry 13:836956. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.836956

Received: 16 December 2021; Accepted: 20 April 2022;
Published: 16 May 2022.

Edited by:

Marco Grados, Johns Hopkins Medicine, United States

Reviewed by:

Rajshekhar Bipeta, Osmania Medical College, India
Suprakash Chaudhury, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, India

Copyright © 2022 Guo, Huang, Zheng, Chen, Lei, Tang, Chen, Ma and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Xuemei Li, MTgxNzcwNDc4JiN4MDAwNDA7cXEuY29t

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.