Fabrizio Schifano1
Stefania Chiappini1,2*
Andrea Miuli2
Alessio Mosca2
Maria Chiara Santovito2
John M. Corkery1
Amira Guirguis3
Mauro Pettorruso2Massimo Di Giannantonio2
Giovanni Martinotti2- 1Psychopharmacology, Drug Misuse and Novel Psychoactive Substances Research Unit, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- 2Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, “G. D'Annunzio” University, Chieti, Italy
- 3Swansea University Medical School, Institute of Life Sciences 2, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom
Background: Over the past 20 years or so, the drug misuse scenario has seen the emergence of both prescription-only and over-the-counter (OTC) medications being reported as ingested for recreational purposes. OTC drugs such as antihistamines, cough/cold medications, and decongestants are reportedly the most popular in being diverted and misused.
Objective: While the current related knowledge is limited, the aim here was to examine the published clinical data on OTC misuse, focusing on antihistamines (e.g., diphenhydramine, promethazine, chlorpheniramine, and dimenhydrinate), dextromethorphan (DXM)- and codeine-based cough medicines, and the nasal decongestant pseudoephedrine.
Methods: A systematic literature review was carried out with the help of Scopus, Web of Science databases, and the related gray literature. For data gathering purposes, both the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) and PROSPERO guidelines were followed (PROSPERO identification code CRD42020209261).
Results: After completion of the selection, eligibility, and screening phases, some 92 articles were here taken into consideration; case reports, surveys, and retrospective case series analyses were included. Findings were organized according to the specific OTC recorded. Most articles focused here on DXM (n = 54) and diphenhydramine (n = 12). When specified, dosages, route(s) of administration, toxicity symptoms (including both physical and psychiatric ones), and outcomes were here reported.
Conclusion: Results from the systematic review showed that the OTC misusing issues are both widespread worldwide and popular; vulnerable categories include adolescents and young adults, although real prevalence figures remain unknown, due to a lack of appropriate monitoring systems. Considering the potential, and at times serious, adverse effects associated with OTC misusing issues, healthcare professionals should be vigilant, and ad hoc preventative actions should be designed and implemented.
Introduction
Since generally being considered safe, over-the-counter (OTC) medicines are available without a prescription and can be purchased directly from related pharmacies/stores (1, 2). OTC medicines are meant to treat a variety of illnesses and symptoms, including pain, coughs and colds, diarrhea, nausea, etc. OTC availability, while encouraging self-care, has contributed to a public perception of safety and a lack of awareness relating to their potential for misuse, dependence, and harm (3–6). Indeed, some OTC medicines have active ingredients possessing a misusing potential at higher-than-recommended dosages (7) and are becoming increasingly popular for the possibility of their diversion in order to reach central psychoactive effects (8–11). Currently, there is minimal information about the prevalence of OTC misuse, abuse, and dependence (8–10, 12). Indeed, current lack of knowledge may partly be due to poor sales' monitoring because of OTCs' favorable legal status. However, the so-called “pharming” phenomenon (13–15) has been requiring attention at different levels because of increased treatment admissions, dangerous behavior, more emergency room visits, drug-related deaths, and overdoses (11, 16, 17). Most implicated drugs include certain cough suppressants, sleep aids, and antihistamines, which can at times be ingested in combination with remaining recreational psychotropics and/or prescription drugs and/or alcohol (17, 18). Overall, the misuse of OTC drugs is considered as more socially acceptable, less stigmatizing, and safer than the intake of illicit substances, also due to their likely lack of detection in standard drug screens (16). OTC drugs' intake may involve snorting or injecting the crushed tablets' powder to amplify the effects of a drug or ingesting these molecules for a purpose different from the therapeutic one. This may be the case for dextromethorphan (DXM) and codeine-based cough mixtures, being possibly misused at high dosages for recreational or euphoric effects; conversely, loperamide is at times being ingested for self-medicating withdrawal symptoms (7, 16, 18–20). OTC misuse has also been associated with notable drug interactions, physical and mental health effects, individual variation in responses, and significant socioeconomic impact for the users, their family, and the wider community (13–15). Currently, most OTC misusing data are obtained through clinical records (e.g., case reports and case series) and surveys.
Aims of the Study
Thus, the current review aimed at (i) examining the current literature on the misuse of OTC drugs, focusing on the following OTCs: among antihistamines, diphenhydramine (DPH), promethazine, chlorpheniramine, and dimenhydrinate (DH); DXM- and codeine-based cough medicines; and the nasal decongestant pseudoephedrine; (ii) illustrating patterns of OTCs' misuse, psychopathological effects, and harms associated; and (iii) better understanding the psychotropic molecular mechanisms underlying their recreational use.
Methods
Systematic Review Procedures
A systematic electronic search was conducted from October 2020 to December 2020 and was set without a timeframe on the following scientific search engines: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS). The gray literature was also checked for relevant information. The following search strategies were used, respectively, in PubMed: (“diphenhydramine” OR “promethazine” OR “chlorpheniramine” OR “dimenhydrinate” OR “dextromethorphan” OR “pseudoephedrine” OR codeine-based cough medicines) AND (“abuse” OR “misuse” OR “craving” OR “addiction”) NOT review NOT (animal OR rat OR mouse) NOT “in vitro;” in Scopus: [TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Diphenhydramine”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Promethazine”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Chlorpheniramine“) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Dimenhydrinate”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Dextromethorphan”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Pseudoephedrine”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (codeine-based cough medicines) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Abuse”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Misuse”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Craving”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Addiction”) AND NOT TITLE-ABS-KEY (Review) AND NOT TITLE-ABS-KEY (animal) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (rat) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (mouse) AND NOT TITLE-ABS-KEY (“in vitro”)]; and WoS: (“diphenhydramine” OR “promethazine” OR “chlorpheniramine” OR “dimenhydrinate” OR “dextromethorphan” OR “pseudoephedrine” OR codeine-based cough medicines) AND (“abuse” OR “misuse” OR “craving” OR “addiction”) NOT Review NOT (animal OR rat OR mouse) NOT “in vitro.” The systematic review was structured in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) (21) and PROSPERO guidelines (22). All data collected were tabulated on an Excel sheet to enable easy comparison and analysis.
Data Synthesis Strategy
The selection and eligibility phase of the articles was carried out by three independent reviewers (AM, AMo, and MCS), who screened articles based on title and abstract; the first screening was followed by full text reviews, using predetermined criteria for inclusion and exclusion. Eligible articles were considered if the published studies met all the following criteria: (i) original articles (open-label or double-blind trials, prospective or retrospective observational studies, case series and case reports); (ii) studies involving all age individuals misusing the OTC drugs selected. There were no other restrictions on the type of study population or publication time period. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (i) nonoriginal research articles (e.g., review, letter, commentary, editorial, book chapter, professional or clients' opinions); (ii) non full-text articles (e.g., meeting/conference abstracts); (iii) languages other than English; (iv) animal/in vitro studies; (v) articles mentioning OTC drugs only as an example in the context of OTC drugs misuse; and (vi) articles not dealing with the misuse of the OTC drugs selected (e.g., DPH, promethazine, chlorpheniramine, and DH; DXM- and codeine-based cough medicines; and pseudoephedrine). Individual studies were also manually searched to identify additional citations. A final, between reviewers, cross-check was carried out, supervised by SC and MP, with both doubtful cases and possible inclusion/exclusion disagreements resolved through discussion with GM, MDG, and FS.
Protocol and Registration
Current research methods were approved by PROSPERO (identification code CRD42020209261).
Risk of Bias
The assessment of risk of bias was made in accordance with the Cochrane risk of bias 2 (RoB 2) tool (23).
Results
In removing duplicate articles (n = 566) from a total of 2,136 papers (PubMed = 393; Scopus = 1,372; WoS = 362; additional sources = 9), some 15,70 records resulted to be relevant for screening. Those considered not relevant to the subject while considering both the title and the abstract (n = 1,103; e.g., animal/in vitro studies; articles only mentioning OTC drugs, or not regarding OTC misuse/abuse, or not giving a clear description of related symptoms), those not written in English (n = 136), and those that were non-original articles (n = 87) were eliminated. Out of the 244 remaining full-text articles assessed for eligibility, some 125 papers did not match the inclusion criteria and 27 were not available. Hence, 92 articles were taken into consideration and properly analyzed (Figure 1). Findings were organized according to the specific OTC recorded, reported in alphabetical order in Supplementary Table 1; conversely, the most relevant characteristics of the misusing potential of the range of OTC drugs commented are summarized in Table 1.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.
Table 1. Drug classification and main characteristics of misuse of the selected OTC drugs.
Dextrometorphan
DXM resulted to be the most reported misused drug, with n = 54 related papers having been here identified (Supplementary Table 1). Indeed, it was recorded in two retrospective studies (24, 25), in 10 case series (26–35), and in several case reports (24, 25, 36–77). Most represented users were male adolescent and young adults; DXM was mostly used alone (28, 36, 37, 40, 44, 45, 54, 57, 66) or in DXM-containing cough mixtures (26, 29, 30, 39, 41, 42, 47, 50, 52, 53, 62, 64, 68, 71, 72, 74, 76). Concomitant drugs included both licit and illicit substances, such as alcohol (25, 30, 31, 35, 52, 53, 55, 60, 71, 76); cannabis (25, 31, 35, 48, 60); sedatives drugs, e.g., benzodiazepines (35); diethylamide lysergic acid (LSD) (35); opioids, e.g., morphine, heroin (25, 35, 54); ecstasy (35); cocaine (35); and phencyclidine/ketamine (34, 35). Dosages varied among cases, up to super-high dosages (up to 4,920 mg) (31, 35, 36, 61). The only route of administration (ROA) here recorded was the oral one. Autonomic (e.g., mydriasis, tachycardia, palpitations) (30, 33, 35, 42, 44, 46, 47, 51, 67, 70, 71), gastrointestinal (32, 35, 42, 47), neurological [e.g., amnesia, nystagmus, ataxia, seizures, and dystonia; (24, 26, 29, 30, 32, 34, 35, 39, 43–46, 49, 51–53, 56, 59, 67)], and psychiatric symptoms, such as euphoria, agitation/irritability, confusion, hallucinations, and delusions, have been recorded (24, 25, 27–31, 33–38, 40–50, 52–54, 56, 58, 60, 61, 63, 66, 67, 70–74, 76). DXM misusers' psychiatric history frequently included alcohol and substance use disorders (SUD) (25–27, 29, 31, 32, 34–37, 40, 43, 45–48, 50, 53, 55–62, 64–67, 69, 76), mood disorders (29, 31, 32, 35, 37, 38, 41, 46, 56–65, 67, 68, 71), and schizophrenia (37, 53, 69). Regarding the outcome, most cases required hospitalization with supportive treatments and antipsychotics [e.g., haloperidol (43, 47, 71, 73, 75)], risperidone (74), and olanzapine (54, 61) administration. A DXM-related suicide has been recorded (31).
Chlorpheniramine and Codeine
Chlorpheniramine and codeine were recorded as having been misused in two papers (respectively, 68 and 69), as constituents of BRON, a Japanese codeine-based cough suppressant, together with methyl-ephedrine and caffeine (78, 79). BRON abuse has been associated with both psychotic/affective symptoms and dependence/withdrawal issues (78). Moreover, a case of severe intoxication of a codeine-based cough mixture determining a respiratory acidosis and requiring hospitalization was recorded (80) (Supplementary Table 1).
Dimenhydrinate
DH misuse was described in eight articles (Supplementary Table 1), including five case reports (81–85) and three case series (86–88), mostly involving adults or adolescents (88). Most important psychiatric comorbidities described were represented by mood disorders (82, 84), SUD (83–87), and schizophrenia (85, 87). Massive dosages, up to 5,000 mg, of DH have been recorded in a few cases (84, 85, 87). DH administration was always oral, except for one case where the molecule was administered intramuscularly in association with opiates and benzodiazepines (83). The symptoms recorded ranged from recreational stimulating effects (87) to emotional lability, agitation, anxiety, and drug-induced delirium with paranoia, thought incoherence, and visual/auditory hallucinations (81, 86). The physical effects reported were mild and included mydriasis, tachycardia, hypertension, flushing, restlessness, dystonic reactions, and ataxia (81, 82, 84–86, 88), while one case reported generalized seizures (87). Withdrawal symptoms have been recorded after the abrupt interruption of chronic use and included irritability, anxiety, and craving (82, 84, 87). When reported, treatment was almost supportive (81–83, 85, 88); in two cases, benztropine was required to treat dyskinesia and related movement, muscle control, and balance symptoms (81, 84).
Diphenhydramine
DPH misuse was reported in 12 articles, including 10 case reports (17, 89–97); the remaining two included, respectively, a case series (98) and a retrospective review study (99) (Supplementary Table 1). Apart from the retrospective review study focusing on all Mandrax® (DPH + Methaqualone) abuse cases (n = 67, male) retrieved from the United States (US) Army during January–June 1972, users were here mostly represented by female (F/M, 9/6). A high number of users were adolescents, aged between 13 and 18 years (17, 94, 96–98). Reported psychiatric comorbidities mostly included SUD (17, 89–92, 95), schizophrenia/psychotic symptoms (89, 91, 92), and mood disorders (17, 90, 91). DPH was taken in most cases orally, but both intramuscular (IM) (90) and intravenous (IV) (96–98) administrations were reported as well. Super-high dosages were recorded, up to 2,000 mg daily (91–93, 98). In a few cases, DPH was misused together with alcohol (91, 99), lorazepam (98), and cannabis (99). A polydrug overdose (e.g., DH together with bupropion, citalopram, acetaminophen, omeprazole, and naproxen) was recorded (94). DPH recreational use was associated with relaxation, calmness, and sleep improvement (90, 92, 96, 98, 99). Acute intoxication was associated with psychotic symptoms, psychomotor agitation, restlessness, and disorientation (89, 92–96, 98, 99). Withdrawal, consisting in both physical (e.g., bowel and bladder incontinence, hypertension, hypertonia, and extrapyramidal symptoms) and psychological (e.g., anxiety, irritability, rebound insomnia, and craving) symptoms have been recorded (17, 89, 90, 92, 95, 98, 99). DPH-induced intoxication was associated with signs and symptoms of anticholinergic toxicity, such as fever, mydriasis, flushed skin, dry mouth, dry eyes, decreased sweating, urinary retention, and dyskinesia (92–94, 98). A severe toxicity case was associated with cardiac conduction abnormalities and increased QT interval (90). On-drug cases of violent behavior, including suicide, have been reported (97, 99). Treatment required hospitalization and supportive care; drugs used were antipsychotics, such as fluphenazine and quetiapine, benzodiazepines, and benztropine (89, 90, 92, 93).
Promethazine
A few papers recorded here the misuse of promethazine; a retrospective analysis of data from the American Association of Poison Control Centres (AAPCC) National Poison Data System (NPDS) from January 2002 to December 2012 reported 354 promethazine intentional misuse/abuse cases (100) (Supplementary Table 1). All cases involved adolescents and young adults who misused promethazine orally. In most cases (n = 259) promethazine abuse was associated with other substances, such as DXM, codeine, phenylephrine, pseudoephedrine, caffeine, etc. Intoxication symptoms ranged from mild to severe effects, up to seizures and coma, but no fatalities have been reported. Agitation, confusion, slurred speech, and hallucinations were described as well. Promethazine-alone abuse cases were mostly managed in healthcare facilities, while promethazine in coformulation mostly required emergency department (ED) care management (100). Moreover, further cases of nonmedical use of promethazine were here identified from (i) the Danish Poison and Information Centre (DPIC) and related registers used within the State Serum Institute of Denmark (SSI) (101); (ii) a prospective database of poisoning admissions (January 1987-May 2007) to a UK regional toxicology service (102); and (iii) a prospective study regarding patterns of misuse of heroin injectors (103). Drug-induced delirium was the most represented psychiatric effects; this was managed with antipsychotics and benzodiazepines (101, 102). Interestingly, the use of promethazine injection in opioid users was reported as a substitute for heroin or to increase the effects of an inadequate heroin dosing (103). A case of drug-induced delirium deriving from the coingestion of high-dose promethazine, cyproheptadine, and fluvoxamine in a young girl was recorded (104). Finally, a case of promethazine dependence and withdrawal after 2-year continuing use of a promethazine–cough mixture was described (105).
Pseudoephedrine
Seven articles, including six case reports (106–111) and one case series (112), described the misuse of pseudoephedrine (Supplementary Table 1). Cases mostly involved male adults (age range, 18–45 years) (F/M, 3/7) suffering from mood disorders (107, 109–111). One paper recorded an SUD [e.g., alcohol, cannabis, and heroin; (112)]. Massive dosages [e.g., 3,000–4,500 mg of pseudoephedrine/day; (107)] and IV administrations (108, 111, 112) have been associated with the misuse of pseudoephedrine. Physical symptoms associated with pseudoephedrine high dosage ingestion included stimulating effects such as decreased appetite, dry mouth, palpitations (106, 107, 112), and motor symptoms [e.g., gait and balance disorder, postural instability, generalized dystonia, hypokinesia, bradykinesia, psychomotor retardation; (106–108, 112)]. Pseudoephedrine effects were dose dependent and ranged from euphoria, insomnia, diminished sense of fatigue, and accelerated thinking, to psychotic symptoms with auditory and visual hallucinations, persecutory delusions, fear, and disorganized behavior (106, 109–111). Withdrawal symptoms have been recorded after the abrupt interruption of the long-term use (106, 107). Some cases required hospitalization and treatment with antipsychotics, e.g., haloperidol (106, 109–111); benzodiazepines (108); and antidepressants, e.g., amitriptyline (106, 108). No fatalities have been recorded.
Discussion
This systematic review has illustrated a range of both themes and data regarding the misuse/abuse of some selected OTC drugs, including DXM, DPH, DH, codeine-based cough syrups, promethazine, and pseudoephedrine. Their misuse potential may be particularly significant in adolescents and young adults (10, 12, 113). OTC recreational intake appeared to be associated with high/very high dosages (17, 27, 30, 31, 35, 36, 40, 42, 45, 46, 55, 58, 61, 66, 76, 79, 84, 85, 88, 90–93, 104, 107, 114); idiosyncratic routes of administration (e.g., snorting; IM; IV; 39, 69, 88–90, 100, 103); and associated with ingestion of both licit [e.g., alcohol, prescription opioids, benzodiazepines, other OTCs; (25, 35, 49, 52–55, 60, 61, 72, 76, 83, 91, 94, 99, 101, 102)] and illicit (e.g., cannabis, cocaine, ketamine, etc.) drugs (30, 31, 34, 35, 48, 58, 60, 61, 88, 99). OTC drugs were obtained by various means (8–11), including family and friends (63), multiple doctor prescriptions (27, 36, 63, 90, 93), illegal online pharmacies/shops (36, 42, 70, 77), and theft/burglary from hospitals, residences, and pharmacies (27, 105, 110). DXM pills named “Snurf” were also reported to have been acquired online and in having been marketed as a legal high (70).
Overall, two main populations of OTC misusers were identified (11): (a) patients already suffering from a health condition and/or a psychiatric disorder who became dependent on their prescription/OTC drugs due to prolonged/high-dosage use (115), e.g., DXM-based cough mixtures started for sinusitis, cough, nasal congestion, and then continued for years at higher dosages (27, 58). Other examples have included DH prescribed for emesis in pregnancy and then continued for 12 years at a higher dosage without a prescription (82), DPH use initiated to assist with initial insomnia and then continued for 6 months up to 1,600 mg daily (92), and pseudoephedrine self-administered to lose weight then causing addiction (106); (b) individuals, including substance abusers, not in treatment for a medical disorder or illness who may have started to misuse/abuse with OTC medications for recreational purposes (36, 40, 43, 45, 70, 116).
Out of a total of n = 185 OTC misusers described in case reports/series surveys (24, 25, 77, 78, 99–103), male subjects were the most represented (F/M = 51/134), with an SUD history having been recorded in 53 of them (53/185 = 28.6%). A range of psychiatric diagnoses were reported (45/185 misusers, 24.3%), including mood disorders (e.g., bipolar disorder, depression, dysthymia; N = 26), anxiety disorders (e.g., adjustment disorder, anxiety; N = 5), psychotic disorders (e.g., schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia, psychosis, delusional disorder; N = 11), attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD, N = 1), eating disorders (e.g., bulimia; N = 1), and personality disorders (e.g., dependent disorder; N = 1). Regarding the outcome, most cases recorded were associated with a full recovery after hospitalization, with treatment having been either supportive (32, 44–46, 65) or symptomatic, with the latter consisting of benzodiazepines and antipsychotics (25, 27, 28, 43, 47, 49, 51, 54, 61, 67, 68, 71, 73–75, 79, 111, 115). A full detoxification procedure was recorded in cases of dependence and withdrawal (17, 82, 92, 95, 98, 105, 107, 109, 115); examples included buprenorphine 2 mg/day to treat a sudden opiate (codeine) withdrawal symptoms (114), naltrexone as a relapse prevention agent for DXM dependence (63), and topiramate for DXM craving (56). Some cases required specific actions in the Emergency Unit (80). Finally, it has been suggested here that drug use treatment would benefit from counseling, behavioral therapies support, and rehabilitation treatment to better overcome drug craving (11, 18, 27, 28, 34, 36, 46, 48, 53, 59, 60, 78, 84, 110, 117). OTC-related fatalities were here related to either cases characterized by unusually high dosages (24, 31, 96) or to suicide/self-aggression (31).
The cough-suppressant DXM resulted here to be the most popular OTC being misused (Supplementary Table 1) due to its dose-dependent sedative, dissociative, and stimulant properties (16, 118–120). Indeed, DXM psychotropic effects are mostly related to its active metabolite dextrorphan, which, if used in large dosages, is able to antagonizes N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, hence modulating the excitatory neurotransmission; this results in the production of specific dissociative, ketamine-like, experiences (19, 25, 31, 56, 118–121) (Supplementary Table 1 and Table 1). The effects depend upon several factors, such as an individual's CYP2D6 subtype, body weight, as well as the degree of tolerance to DXM, and the concomitant use of other CYP2D6 substrates, including antidepressants (fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, nefazodone, paroxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine), antipsychotics (clozapine, haloperidol, risperidone, thioridazine), β-blockers (atenolol, metoprolol, propranolol), antiarrhythmics, and opioid analgesics (codeine, tramadol, and methadone), which may decrease the rate of DXM metabolism, resulting in a DXM intoxication (13, 19, 47, 121, 122). Due to DXM catabolism by repeated demethylation, which may lead to abnormal folate demands for methyl group transfer, a folate deficiency has been described in association with chronic DXM use (26, 39, 122). In addition, dental caries cases were associated with the high syrup content of cough mixtures (26). Although DXM is not thought to have addictive properties, with chronic use, vulnerable individuals may rapidly develop tolerance, dependence, and withdrawal (35, 36, 56, 58, 63, 66, 76). Interactions with other substances can often produce synergistic effects; in fact, OTC cough formulations frequently contain, in addition to DXM, other pharmaceutical agents such as chlorpheniramine, acetaminophen, or pseudoephedrine, exhibiting different effects. Indeed, individuals abusing with chlorpheniramine-containing DXM formulations may also exhibit anticholinergic signs and symptoms (25, 31, 42, 47, 49, 73, 74, 123). Conversely, the antipyretic and analgesic acetaminophen produces delayed hepatic injury (29, 62). Finally, interactions between DXM and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) might further increase the risk of a serotoninergic syndrome occurrence (67, 68, 121, 124).
Although widely used and generally considered safe, cases of antihistamine abuse and dependence have been recorded (125). These molecules were originally marketed for their antiallergy properties and are now made available as sleeping aids. Antihistamines' toxicity appears to be clinically related to both central and peripheral acetylcholine antagonism. In addition, specifically due to multiple potential mechanisms of action, DPH (e.g., the antihistamine moiety of DH) can acutely block the cell membrane pump mechanism of central 5-hydroxytryptophane and peripheral noradrenaline neurons, causing the euphoria reported by some users (Table 1). At high dosages, and taken together with other drugs (e.g., alcohol, cannabis, and stimulants), DPH and DH might be used to achieve a stimulant effect (87, 91, 92, 126, 127). Reported cases of DPH dependence have resulted from long-term usage of large doses (often over 1,000 mg/day). Gradual tapering has been described to alleviate withdrawal symptoms (17, 125). Conversely, promethazine is used in cough syrups for its antihistaminic, antiemetic, and sedative effects, available with codeine in common cough suppressants (128); its abuse potential appears related to its calming and sedating effect and enhancement of other coingested substances (Table 1). A recreational use of promethazine mixed with a soft drink and/or alcohol (“purple drank”) is currently popular among young people for its euphoric effects and easy accessibility (19, 20, 129–131). Promethazine has been reported in SUD clients and is misused as a substitute for another drug or to increase the effects of inadequate dosing (i.e., to delay the onset of opioid withdrawal or to potentiate the sedating effect of benzodiazepines/Z-drugs) (13, 19, 20, 103, 129, 130, 132, 133). Overdose of promethazine is associated with an antimuscarinic delirium, agitation, and neuroleptic malignant syndrome (100, 102, 104, 133). Scott et al. (104) recorded a promethazine-induced delirium treated with physostigmine intravenously, which reversed both central and peripheral anticholinergic effects, similarly to a polydrug overdose due to the ingestion of DPH (94). Chlorpheniramine is used as a cheap sleep aid and/or as an anxiolytic due to its antimuscarinic properties; its abuse has been related to pleasurable feelings, which reinforces the repetitive use and the possibility of developing drug dependence (Table 1). It may, however, be associated with psychotic symptoms in predisposed individuals [e.g., people with mental illnesses or individuals concomitantly abusing other drugs; (42, 43, 114, 115)].
Codeine was reported within the misusing scenario of codeine-based cough and cold medicines and/or coingested with other substances, e.g., DXM, DPH, ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, methyl ephedrine, chlorpheniramine, promethazine, caffeine (26, 27, 34, 78–80, 100, 114, 134). Codeine is a natural isomer of methylated morphine and, similarly to DXM, is a prodrug, requiring metabolic activation by O-demethylation to morphine by CYP2D6. Thus, codeine-related effects are associated with CYP2D6 metabolism, e.g., ultrarapid CYP2D6 metabolizers produce an unexpectedly large amount of morphine, with resulting life-threatening opioid toxicity. Its recreational use is related to the agonism at mu receptors and the subjective effects of euphoria, elation, analgesia, and “liking” (114, 121). Codeine toxicity is characterized by respiratory depression and extreme somnolence progressing to stupor or coma (79); in severe overdosage cases, death may occur (121) (Supplementary Table 1 and Table 1). Idiosyncratic codeine administration procedures have been recorded, e.g., a misuser learned online how the codeine base might be extracted through a process called cold water extraction (CWE) to be then injected. Regular use of codeine is described here together with the development of both tolerance (135) and dependence (80, 114).
Decongestants, here recorded as being abused, both alone and with coingestants, were ephedrine and its stereoisomer pseudoephedrine (78, 79, 106–109, 111, 112), which are sympathomimetic agents (136, 137) exerting a stimulating action on both alpha- and beta-adrenergic receptors (136, 137) (Supplementary Table 1 and Table 1). Indeed, ephedrine has been reported to obtain weight loss or to enhance athletic performance; both pseudoephedrine and ephedrine have been recorded as used illicitly in the production of methamphetamine (136, 138). The abuse was here associated with high dosage (106–109) and IV administration (108, 111, 112). Dependence issues have been recorded (106–109).
Limitations
One of the difficulties regarding the literature on prescription drug misuse is both its heterogeneity and the issues in identifying misusing practices; interpretation was easier for both those cases reported by healthcare professionals, whose intervention was needed, National/Regional Poison Data System information (100, 101), etc. According to UNODC, the misuse of medicines is defined as “the problematic consumption outside of acceptable medical practice or medical guidelines, when self-medicating at higher doses and for longer than is advisable, for intoxicating purposes and when risks and adverse consequences outweigh the benefit” (8–11). However, levels of terminology variability and inconsistency to describe the OTC phenomenon were identified as well; this use was referred to as non-medical use, problem use, harmful use, recreational use, self-medication, or inappropriate use, which calls into question whether there is a consensus on the negative consequences (i.e., problem, harm) of OTC use. Indeed, some of these terms may not even necessarily refer to the same issue (8).
Conclusions
The current systematic review showed that OTC misuse is an increasingly relevant health issue associated with potential harms, including drug-related toxicity, addiction, and fatalities. Nowadays, the CoViD-19 pandemic has likely facilitated the occurrence of these misusing practices, as more users turned from street drugs to prescription/OTC products (14, 15). Indeed, OTC drugs are both widely accessible and perceived because of their favorable legal status as relatively safe, hence accepted in a “pill-popping culture” (11). There is the need of both drafting ad hoc treatment guidelines and planning preventative measures. These measures should revolve around the implementation of a range of associated issues, including scheduling amendments, proper surveillance, enhanced detection of misuse in clinical and pharmacy practice, and promotion of public health awareness initiatives (9, 11, 16, 139–141). As an example, due to the recent rise in opioid abuse and related overdose deaths worldwide, efforts are focusing on strengthening public health surveillance and limiting opioid prescribing (142, 143). Specifically, as codeine-containing products misusing levels might be hampered by their widespread and easy availability, upscheduling and pharmacy-based interventions targeting users might limit the purchase of codeine products without a prescription. The recent introduction of new OTC combinations with non-opioid agents may provide a safer alternative to these widely misused products (144). In the case of the antidiarrheal loperamide, found to be misused at high dosages and associated with cardiotoxicity, to support its safe use, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved changes to the packaging for tablet and capsule forms limiting each carton to no more than 48 mg of loperamide and requiring the tablets and capsules to be packaged in individual doses (145). A range of professionals should be involved in tackling the OTC misusing issues, including (i) physicians, especially general practitioners (GP), who can help OTC misusers in early recognizing a drug-related problem and refer them to the appropriate service (e.g., mental or addiction services); they should also take note of rapid increases in the amount of medication needed or frequent, unscheduled refill requests and uncovering possible “doctor shopping” practices. Physicians will continue to have a role in educating users to ensure that they use medications appropriately, following the prescribed directions, while being aware of potential interactions with other licit/illicit drugs (11, 16, 18, 116, 135, 141). Conversely, pharmacists should be watchful for prescription falsifications or alterations, being at the frontline in recognizing prescription drug abuse issues. Moreover, prescription drug monitoring programs could assist healthcare professionals in identifying patients who are getting prescriptions from multiple sources (11, 13, 16–18, 141, 144, 146). Finally, abuse prevention campaigns might provide valuable resources on raising awareness and preventing medicine abuse [https://stopmedicineabuse.org/; (144)].
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Author Contributions
FS, SC, and GM conceived the idea of this paper. AM, MCS, and AMo extracted the data. FS, MP, GM, AG, and MDG supervised all stages of the process and were consulted to resolve any possible disagreement. SC, AM, and JMC drafted the first version and revised it after contributions from FS, AG, and GM. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
GM received funds from the European Project entitled Analysis, Knowledge dissemination, Justice implementation, and Special Testing of Novel Synthetic Opioids—JUST-2017-AG-DRUG.
Conflict of Interest
FS was a member of the UK Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD; 2011–2019) and is currently a member of the EMA Advisory Board (Psychiatry). GM has been a consultant and/or a speaker and/or has received research grants from Angelini, Doc Generici, Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Pfizer, Servier, Recordati. MDG has been a consultant and/or a speaker and/or has received research grants from Angelini, Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Pfizer, Servier, Recordati. JMC is a member of the ACMD's Novel Psychoactive Substances and Technical Committees.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.657397/full#supplementary-material
References
1. FDA. Understanding Over-the-Counter Medicines. Food and Drug Administration (2018). Available from: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/buying-using-medicine-safely/understanding-over-counter-medicines (accessed January 17, 2021).
2. MHRA. Guidance Medicines: Reclassify Your Product. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (2020). Available from: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/medicines-reclassify-your-product#:~:text='Over%2Dthe%2Dcounter%20,in%20the%20UK%20medicines%20regulations (accessed January 17, 2021).
3. Cooper RJ. 'I can't be an addict. I am' Over-the-counter medicine abuse: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. (2013) 3:e002913. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002913
4. Hughes C. A retrospective evaluation of over-the-counter (OTC) drug-related overdoses at Accident and Emergency Departments in Northern Ireland. In: Abstract at the BPC- Manchester, UK (September 1, 2003) (2003). p. R45–5.
5. Wazaify M, Shields E, Hughes CM, McElnay JC. Societal perspectives on over-the-counter (OTC) medicines. Fam Pract. (2005) 22:170–6. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh723
6. Cooper RJ. Over-the-counter medicine abuse-a review of the literature. J Subst Use. (2013) 18:82e107. doi: 10.3109/14659891.2011.615002
7. NIDA. Over-the-Counter Medicines DrugFacts. National Institute on Drug Abuse (2017). Available from: https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugfacts/over-counter-medicines (accessed January 10, 2021).
8. Barrett SP, Meisner JR, Stewart SH. What constitutes prescription drug misuse? Problems and pitfalls of current conceptualizations. Curr Drug Abuse Rev. (2008) 1:255–62. doi: 10.2174/1874473710801030255
9. Casati A, Sedefov R, Pfeiffer-Gerschel T. Misuse of medicines in the European Union: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Addict Res. (2012) 18:228–45. doi: 10.1159/000337028
10. Novak SP, Håkansson A, Martinez-Raga J, Reimer J, Krotki K, Varughese S. Nonmedical use of prescription drugs in the European Union. BMC Psychiatry. (2016) 16:274. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0909-3
11. UNODC. The Non-Medical Use of Prescription Drugs. Policy direction issues. Discussion paper. United Nations OFFICE on DRUGS and Crime (2011). Available from: https://www.unodc.org/documents/drug-prevention-and-treatment/nonmedical-use-prescription-drugs.pdf (accessed January 10, 2021).
12. Fingleton NA, Watson MC, Duncan EM, Matheson C. Non-prescription medicine misuse, abuse and dependence: a cross-sectional survey of the UK general population. J Public Health. (2016) 38:722–30. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdv204
13. Chiappini S, Guirguis A, Corkery JM, Schifano F. Understanding the use of prescription and OTC drugs in obtaining highs and the pharmacist role in preventing abuse. Pharm J. (2020) 305:7943. doi: 10.1211/PJ.2020.20208538
14. Chiappini S, Guirguis A, John A, Corkery JM, Schifano F. COVID-19: The hidden impact on mental health and drug addiction. Front Psychiatry. (2020) 11:767. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00767
15. Chiappini S, Schifano F. What about “Pharming”? Issues regarding the misuse of prescription and over-the-counter drugs. Brain Sci. (2020) 10:736. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10100736
16. Levine DA. “Pharming”: the abuse of prescription and over-the-counter drugs in teens. Curr Opin Pediatr. (2007) 19:270–4. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32814b09cf
17. Gracious B, Abe N, Sundberg J. The importance of taking a history of over-the-counter medication use: a brief review and case illustration of “PRN” antihistamine dependence in a hospitalized adolescent. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. (2010) 20:521–4. doi: 10.1089/cap.2010.0031
18. NIDA. National Institute of Health (NIH). Research Report Series. Prescription Drug Abuse. National Institute on Drug Abuse (2011).
19. NIDA. Cough and Cold Medicines. National Institute on Drug Abuse (2020). Available from: https://teens.drugabuse.gov/drug-facts/cough-and-cold-medicines (accessed January 10, 2021).
20. NIDA. Misuse of Prescription Drugs. Overview. National Institute on Drug Abuse (2020). Available from: https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/research-reports/misuse-prescription-drugs/overview (accessed January 10, 2021).
21. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. (2015) 4:1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
22. Bernardo WM. PRISMA statement and PROSPERO. Int Braz J Urol. (2017) 43:383–4. doi: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2017.03.02
23. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC, (editors). Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.2.0 (updated June 2017), Cochrane, 2017 (2017). Available from: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook (accessed December 20, 2020).
24. Forrester MB. Dextromethorphan abuse in Texas, 2000-2009. J Addict Dis. (2011) 30:243–7. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2011.581986
25. Ritter D, Ouellette L, Sheets JD, Riley B, Judge B, Cook A, et al. “Robo-tripping”: Dextromethorphan toxicity and abuse. Am J Emerg Med. (2020) 38:839–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.10.001
26. Au WY, Tsang J, Cheng TS, Chow WS, Woo YC, Ma SK, et al. Cough mixture abuse as a novel cause of megaloblastic anaemia and peripheral neuropathy. Br J Haematol. (2003) 123:956–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04694.x
28. Hapangama A, Kuruppuarachchi K. Dextromethorphan abuse. React Wkly. (2011) 18:109–110. doi: 10.2165/00128415-201113640-00066
29. Kirages TJ, Sulé HP, Mycyk MB. Severe manifestations of coricidin intoxication. Am J Emerg Med. (2003) 21:473–5. doi: 10.1016/S0735-6757(03)00168-2
30. Logan BK. Combined dextromethorphan and chlorpheniramine intoxication in impaired drivers. J Forensic Sci. (2009) 54:1176–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01127.x
31. Logan BK, Yeakel JK, Goldfogel G, Frost MP, Sandstrom G, Wickham DJ. Dextromethorphan abuse leading to assault, suicide, or homicide. J Forensic Sci. (2012) 57:1388–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02133.x
32. Murray S, Brewerton T. Abuse of over-the-counter dextromethorphan by teenagers. South Med J. (1993) 86:1151–3. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199310000-00014
33. Nordt SP. DXM: a new drug of abuse? Ann Emerg Med. (1998) 31:794–5. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70250-1
35. Ziaee V, Hamed EA, Hoshmand A, Amini H, Kebriaeizadeh A, Saman K. Side effects of dextromethorphan abuse, a case series. Addicti Behav. (2005) 30:1607–13. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.02.005
36. Akerman SC, Hammel JL, Brunette MF. Dextromethorphan abuse and dependence in adolescents. J Dual Diagn. (2010) 6:266–78. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2010.537515
37. Alam LY, Nelson A, Bastiampillai T. Cough syrup psychosis: Is it under-recognised? Aust N Z J Psychiatry. (2013) 47:1209–10. doi: 10.1177/0004867413495927
38. Amaladoss A, Brien SO. Cough syrup psychosis. CJEM. (2011) 13:53–6. doi: 10.2310/8000.2011.100216
39. Au WY, Cheng TS, Siu TS, Tam S. Cerebellar degeneration and folate deficiency due to cough mixture abuse. Haematologica. (2005) 90(Suppl.):ECR28.
40. Bernstein LB, Albert D, Baguer C, Popiel M. Long-term dextromethorphan use and acute intoxication results in an episode of mania and autoenucleation. J Addict Med. (2020) 14:e133–5. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000568
41. Bostwick JM. Dextromethorphan-induced manic symptoms in a bipolar patient on lithium. Psychosomatics. (1996) 37:571–3. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(96)71523-2
43. Butwicka A, Krystyna S, Retka W, Wolańczyk T. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome in an adolescent with CYP2D6 deficiency. Eur J Pediatr. (2014) 173:1639–42. doi: 10.1007/s00431-013-2208-z
44. Cherkes JK, Friedman JH. Dextromethorphan-induced neurologic illness in a patient with negative toxicology findings. Neurology. (2006) 66:1952–3. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000219805.24666.34
46. Desai S, Aldea D, Daneels E, Soliman M, Braksmajer AS, Kopes-Kerr CP. Chronic addiction to dextromethorphan cough syrup: a case report. J Am Board Fam Med. (2006) 19:320–3. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.19.3.320
47. Dilich A, Girgis C. Robo-tripping: a case of robitussin abuse in a methadone maintenance patient. Psychosomatics. (2017) 58:544–50. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2017.03.010
48. Fleming PM. Dependence on dextromethorphan hydrobromide. BMJ. (1986) 293:597. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6547.597
49. Ganetsky M, Babu KM, Boyer EW. Serotonin syndrome in dextromethorphan ingestion responsive to propofol therapy. Pediatr Emerg Care. (2007) 23:829–31. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31815a0667
50. Helfer J, Kim OM. Psychoactive abuse potential of Robitussin-DM. Am J Psychiatry. (1990) 147:672–3. doi: 10.1176/ajp.147.5.672b
51. Hendrickson RG, Cloutier RL. “Crystal Dex:” free-base dextromethorphan. J Emerg Med. (2007) 32:393–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.03.010
52. Hinsberger A, Sharma V, Mazmanian D. Cognitive deterioration from long-term abuse of dextromethorphan: a case report. J Psychiatry Neurosci. (1994) 19:375–7.
53. Iaboni RP, Aronowitz JS. Dextromethotphan abuse in a dually diagnosis patient. J Nerv Ment Dis. (1995) 183:341–2. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199505000-00014
54. Jamison SC, Vasudeva S. A 60-year-old woman with agitation and psychosis following ingestion of dextromethorphan and opioid analgesics. J Psychopharmacol. (2009) 23:989–91. doi: 10.1177/0269881108092125
55. Kaplan B, Buchanan J, Krantz MJ. QTc prolongation due to dextromethorphan. Int J Cardiol. (2011) 148:363–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.09.024
56. Roy AK III, Hsieh C, Crapanzano K. Dextromethorphan addiction mediated through the NMDA system: common pathways with alcohol? J Addict Med. (2015) 9:499–501. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000152
57. Kimber TE, Thompson PD. Segmental dystonia in the context of dextromethorphan abuse: a new cause of delayed onset drug-induced dystonia? Mov Disord Clin Pract. (2015) 2:299–300. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12148
58. Linn KA, Long MT, Pagel PS. Robo-tripping: dextromethorphan abuse and its anesthetic implications. Anesth Pain Med. (2014) 4:e20990. doi: 10.5812/aapm.20990
59. Majlesi N, Lee DC, Ali SS. Dextromethorphan abuse masquerading as a recurrent seizure disorder. Pediatr Emerg Care. (2011) 27:210–1. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31820d8dc1
60. Marsh LD, Key JD, Spratt E. Bulimia and dextromethorphan abuse: a case study. J Subst Abuse Treat. (1997) 14:373–6. doi: 10.1016/S0740-5472(97)00019-6
61. Martinak B, Bolis RA, Black JR, Fargason RE, Birur B. Dextromethorphan in cough syrup: the poor man's psychosis. Psychopharmacol Bull. (2017) 47:59–63.
62. Medows M, Acosta C, Vega V. Pancreatitis and acute liver failure from Coricidin® HBP intoxication. Cureus. (2020) 12:e10202. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10202
63. Miller SC. Treatment of dextromethorphan dependence with naltrexone. Addict Disord Treatment. (2005) 4:145–8. doi: 10.1097/01.adt.0000186359.43340.76
64. Modi D, Bhalavat R, Patterson JC II. Suicidal and homicidal behaviors related to dextromethorphan abuse in a middle-aged woman. J Addict Med. (2013) 7:143–4. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0b013e318281a547
65. Monks S, Yen M, Myers J. Bromism: an overlooked and elusive toxidrome from chronic dextromethorphan abuse. Am J Emerg Med. (2020) 38:1696.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158491
66. Mutschler J, Koopmann A, Grosshans M, Hermann D, Mann K, Kiefer F. Dextromethorphan: Entzugs- und abhängigkeitssyndrom. Dtsch Arztebl. (2010) 7:537–40. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0537
67. Navarro A, Perry C, Bobo WV. A case of serotonin syndrome precipitated by abuse of the anticough remedy dextromethorphan in a bipolar patient treated with fluoxetine and lithium. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. (2006) 28:78–80. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2005.06.008
68. Okland T, Shirazi M, Rylander M, Holland J. A case of aggressive psychosis in the setting of regular dextromethorphan abuse. Psychosomatics. (2016) 57:655–6. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2016.06.002
70. Osterhoudt KC, Miloradovich J. Snurfin' USA. Pediatr Emerg Care. (2010) 26:693–4. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181f4f1e5
71. Polles A, Griffith JL. Dextromethorphan-induced mania. Psychosomatics. (1996) 37:71–4. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(96)71601-8
72. Roberge RJ, Hirani KH, Rowland PL III, Berkeley R, Krenzelok EP. Dextromethorphan and pseudoephedrine-induced agitated psychosis and ataxia: case report. J Emerg Med. (1999) 17:285–8. doi: 10.1016/S0736-4679(98)00193-0
73. Sharma A, Dewan V, Petty F. Acute psychosis with Coricidin cold medicine. Ann Pharmacother. (2005) 39:1577–8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G193
74. Stanciu CN, Penders TM. Mania after misuse of dextromethorphan: a case report and brief review of “robotripping”. J Addict Med. (2015) 9:159–60. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000104
75. Walker J, Yatham LN. Benylin (dextromethorphan) abuse and mania. BMJ. (1993) 306:896. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6882.896
76. Wolfe TR, Caravati EM. Massive dextromethorphan ingestion and abuse. Am J Emerg Med. (1995) 13:174–6. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(95)90088-8
77. Qiu YW, Lv XF, Jiang GH, Su HH, Ma XF, Tian JZ, et al. Potential gray matter unpruned in adolescents and young adults dependent on dextromethorphan-containing cough syrups: evidence from cortical and subcortical study. Brain Imaging Behav. (2017) 11:1470–8. doi: 10.1007/s11682-016-9628-0
78. Ishigooka J, Yoshida Y, Murasaki M. Abuse of “BRON”: a Japanese OTC cough suppressant solution containing methylephedrine, codeine, caffeine and chlorpheniramine. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. (1991) 15:513–21. doi: 10.1016/0278-5846(91)90026-W
79. Murao S, Manabe H, Yamashita T, Sekikawa T. Intoxication with over-the-counter antitussive medication containing dihydrocodeine and chlorpheniramine causes generalized convulsion and mixed acidosis. Intern Med. (2008) 47:1013–5. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.47.0925
80. Wong KM, Chak WL, Cheung CY, Chan YH, Choi KS, Chau KF, et al. Hypokalemic metabolic acidosis attributed to cough mixture abuse. Am J Kidney Dis. (2001) 38:390–4. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.26107
81. Brown JH, Sigmundson HK. Delirium from misuse of dimenhydrinate. Can Med Assoc, J. (1969) 101:49–50. doi: 10.4039/Ent101109-1
82. Kaya FD. A patient with dimenhydrinate dependence: a case report. Klin Psikofarmakol Bul. (2014) 24:184–7. doi: 10.5455/bcp.20140131023347
83. Oliver M, Stenn PG. Is there a risk for dependency with therapeutic doses of dimenhydrinate? Psychosomatics. (1993) 34:459. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(93)71856-3
84. Wen X, Di Paola F, Chopra N. Psychotropics in your medicine cabinet: a case study of dimenhydrinate Use. J Addict Med. (2019) 13:412–4. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000511
85. White RF, Honer WG, Procyshyn RM, Vila-Rodriguez F. Dimenhydrinate use disorder with chronic psychosis. J Clin Psychopharmacol. (2015) 35:105–7. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000238
86. Malcolm R, Miller WC. Dimenhydrinate (Dramamine) abuse: hallucinogenic experiences with a proprietary antihistamine. Am J Psychiatry. (1972) 128:1012–3. doi: 10.1176/ajp.128.8.1012
87. Prost E, Millson RC. Clozapine treatment of dimenhydrinate abuse. Am J Psychiatry. (2004) 161:1500. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.8.1500
88. Rowe C, Verjee Z, Koren G. Adolescent dimenhydrinate abuse: resurgence of an old problem. J Adolesc Health. (1997) 21:47–9. doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(96)00291-1
89. Bonham C, Birkmayer F. Severe diphenhydramine dependence and withdrawal: case report. J Dual Diagn. (2009) 5:97–103. doi: 10.1080/15504260802620269
90. Chen TY, Yeh YW, Kuo SC, Chen CY, Lin TP, Chang CC. Diphenhydramine dependence through deep intramuscular injection resulting in myonecrosis and prolonged QT interval. J Clin Pharm Ther. (2014) 39:325–7. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12142
92. Feldman MD, Behar M. A case of massive diphenhydramine abuse and withdrawal from use of the drug. JAMA. (1986) 255:3119–20. doi: 10.1001/jama.1986.03370220081028
93. Hermann DM, Bassetti CL. Reversible opsoclonus after diphenhydramine misuse. Eur Neurol. (2005) 53:46–7. doi: 10.1159/000084266
94. Phillips MA, Acquisto NM, Gorodetsky RM, Wiegand TJ. Use of a physostigmine continuous infusion for the treatment of severe and recurrent antimuscarinic toxicity in a mixed drug overdose. JMT. (2014) 10:205–9. doi: 10.1007/s13181-013-0330-y
95. Saran JS, Barbano RL, Schult R, Wiegand TJ, Selioutski O. Chronic diphenhydramine abuse and withdrawal: a diagnostic challenge. Neurol Clin Pract. (2017) 7:439–41. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000304
96. Smith SG, Davis WM. Nonmedical use of butorphanol and diphenhydramine. JAMA. (1984) 252:1010. doi: 10.1001/jama.252.8.1010c
97. Sundararaghavan S, Suarez WA. Oral benadryl and central venous catheter abuse-a potentially “lethal combination”. Pediatr Emerg Care. (2004) 20:604–6. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000139743.38968.7f
98. Dinndorf PA, McCabe MA, Frierdich S. Risk of abuse of diphenhydramine in children and adolescents with chronic illnesses. J Pediatr. (1998) 133:293–5. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(98)70240-9
99. Tennant FS. Complications of methaqualone-diphenhydramine (Mandrax R) abuse. Br J Addict Alcohol Other Drugs. (1973) 68:327–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1973.tb01265.x
100. Tsay ME, Procopio G, Anderson BD, Klein-Schwartz W. Abuse and intentional misuse of promethazine reported to US poison centers: 2002 to 2012. J Addict Med. (2015) 9:233–7. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000124
101. Jensen LL, Rømsing J, Dalhoff K. A Danish survey of antihistamine use and poisoning patterns. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. (2017) 120:64–70. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12632
102. Page CB, Duffull SB, Whyte IM, Isbister GK. Promethazine overdose: clinical effects, predicting delirium and the effect of charcoal. QJM. (2009) 102:123–31. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcn153
103. Clatts M, Giang le M, Goldsamt L, Colón-López V. Nonmedical use of promethazine hydrochloride among heroin injectors in Vietnam: unrecognized risks and unintended consequences. Subst Use Misuse. (2010) 45:515–27. doi: 10.3109/10826080903452520
104. Scott J, Pache D, Keane G, Buckle H, O'Brien N. Prolonged anticholinergic delirium following antihistamine overdose. Australas Psychiatry. (2007) 15:242–4. doi: 10.1080/10398560601147020
105. Tan CH, Kua EH, Lee EL. Cough mixture addiction–a case report. Singapore Med J. (1988) 29:186–7.
106. Alevizos B. Dependence and chronic psychosis with D-nor-pseudoephedrine. Eur Psychiatry. (2003) 18:423–5. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2003.05.001
107. Diaz MA, Wise TN, Semchyshyn GO. Self-medication with pseudoephedrine in a chronically depressed patient. Am J Psychiatry. (1979) 136:1217–8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.136.9.1217
108. Koksal A, Baybas S, Sozmen V, Koksal NS, Altunkaynak Y, Dirican A, et al. Chronic manganese toxicity due to substance abuse in Turkish patients. Neurol India. (2012) 60:224–7. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.96407
109. Leighton KM. Paranoid psychosis after abuse of Actifed. Br Med J. (1982) 284:789–90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6318.789-a
110. Pugh CR, Howie SM. Dependence on pseudoephedrine. Br J Psychiatry. (1986) 149:798. doi: 10.1192/bjp.149.6.798a
111. Sullivan G. Acute psychosis following intravenous abuse of pseudoephedrine: a case report. J Psychopharmacol. (1996) 10:324–5. doi: 10.1177/026988119601000413
112. Sikk K, Taba P, Haldre S, Bergquist J, Nyholm D, Zjablov G, et al. Irreversible motor impairment in young addicts–ephedrone, manganism or both? Acta Neurol Scand. (2007) 115:385–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2007.00818.x
113. NIDA. Monitoring the Future Study: Trends in Prevalence of Various Drugs. Overview. National Institute on Drug Abuse (2020). Available from: https://www.drugabuse.gov/drug-topics/trends-statistics/monitoring-future/monitoring-future-study-trends-in-prevalence-various-drugs (accessed January 10, 2021).
114. Donuk T, Altlntoprak AE, Tekin H. Possible causal link between idiopathic intracranial hypertension and the misuse of codeine-based products. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. (2016) 26:764–5. doi: 10.1089/cap.2015.0042
115. Das S, Palappallil DS, Malathesh BC, Chatterjee SS. Chlorpheniramine dependence presenting as mania. Asian J Psychiatr. (2017) 30:29–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2017.07.007
116. Inciardi JA, Surratt HL, Cicero TJ, Beard RA. Prescription opioid abuse and diversion in an urban community: the results of an ultrarapid assessment. Pain Med. (2009) 10:537–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00603.x
117. Clinical guidelines on Drug Misuse and Dependence Update. Independent Expert Working Group (2017) Drug Misuse and Dependence: UK Guidelines on Clinical Management. London: Department of Health. (2017). Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/673978/clinical_guidelines_2017.pdf (accessed January 10, 2021).
118. Journey JD, Agrawal S, Stern E. Dextromethorphan toxicity. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing (2020).
119. Schifano F, Orsolini L, Papanti D, Corkery J. Novel psychoactive substances of interest for psychiatry. World Psychiatry. (2015) 14:15–26. doi: 10.1002/wps.20174
120. Reissig CJ, Carter LP, Johnson MW, Mintzer MZ, Klinedinst MA, Griffiths RR. High doses of dextromethorphan, an NMDA antagonist, produce effects similar to classic hallucinogens. Psychopharmacol. (2012) 223:1–15. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2680-6
121. Burns JM, Boyer EW. Antitussives and substance abuse. Subst Abuse Rehabil. (2013) 4:75–82. doi: 10.2147/SAR.S36761
122. Zawertailo LA, Kaplan HL, Busto UE, Tyndale RF, Sellers EM. Psychotropic effects of dextromethorphan are altered by the CYP2D6 polymorphism: a pilot study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. (1998) 18:332–7. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199808000-00014
123. Carbonaro TM, Johnson MW, Griffiths RR. Subjective features of the psilocybin experience that may account for its self-administration by humans: a double-blind comparison of psilocybin and dextromethorphan. Psychopharmacol. (2020) 237:2293–304. doi: 10.1007/s00213-020-05533-9
124. Monte AA, Chuang R, Bodmer M. Dextromethorphan, chlorphenamine and serotonin toxicity: case report and systematic literature review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. (2010) 70:794–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03747.x
125. Elwood WN. Sticky business: patterns of procurement and misuse of prescription cough syrup in Houston. J Psychoact Drugs. (2001) 33:121–33. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2001.10400477
126. Preston KL, Wolf B, Guarino JJ, Griffiths RR. Subjective and behavioral effects of diphenhydramine, lorazepam and methocarbamol: evaluation of abuse liability. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. (1992) 262:707–20.
127. Mumford GK, Silverman K, Griffiths RR. Reinforcing, subjective, and performance effects of lorazepam and diphenhydramine in humans. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. (1996) 4:421–30. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.4.4.421
128. Bergman J, Wallman P. Promethazine overdose: is it “Goodnight” after all?. N Z Med J. (1998) 111:246–8.
129. Chiappini S, Schifano F, Corkery JM, Guirguis A. Beyond the ‘purple drank’: Study of promethazine abuse according to the European Medicines Agency adverse drug reaction reports. J Psychopharmacol. (2021) 10:269881120959615. doi: 10.1177/0269881120959615
130. Miuli A, Stigliano G, Lalli A, Coladonato M, D'Angelo L, Esposito F, et al. Purple Drank (Codeine and Promethazine Cough Syrup): a systematic review of a social phenomenon with medical implications. J Psychoactive Drugs. (2020) 52:453–62. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2020.1797250
131. Williams JF, Lundahl LH. Focus on adolescent use of club drugs and “other” substances. Pediatr Clin North Am. (2019) 66:1121–34. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2019.08.013
132. Dahlman D, Abrahamsson T, Kral AH, Hakansson A. Nonmedical use of antihistaminergic anxiolytics and other prescription drugs among persons with opioid dependence. J Addict. (2016) 2016:9298571. doi: 10.1155/2016/9298571
133. Shapiro BJ, Lynch KL, Toochinda T, Lutnick A, Cheng HY, Kral AH. Promethazine misuse among methadone maintenance patients and community-based injection drug users. J Addict Med. (2013) 7:96–101. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0b013e31827f9b43
134. Lee E, Cooper RJ. Codeine addiction and internet forum use and support: qualitative netnographic study. JMIRMent Health. (2019) 6:e12354. doi: 10.2196/12354
135. Kimergård A, Foley M, Davey Z, Dunne J, Drummond C, Deluca P. Codeine use, dependence and help-seeking behaviour in the UK and Ireland: an online cross-sectional survey. QJM. (2017) 110:559–64. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcx076
136. Gorodetsky R. Pseudoephedrine. In: Encyclopedia of Toxicology. 3rd ed. Elsevier, Academic Press (2014). p. 1123–5.
137. Pereira Limberger R, Bemvenuti Jacques AL, Schmitt GC, Dutra Arbo M. Pharmacological effects of ephedrine. In: Ramawat K, Mérillon JM, editors. Natural Products. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer (2013).
138. Gov. uk. Pseudoephedrine and Ephedrine: Update on Managing Risk of Misuse (2015). Available from: https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update/pseudoephedrine-and-ephedrine-update-on-managing-risk-of-misuse (accessed January 18, 2021).
139. Coombes H, Cooper RJ. Staff perceptions of prescription and over-the-counter drug dependence services in England: a qualitative study. Addict Sci Clin Pract. (2019) 14:41. doi: 10.1186/s13722-019-0170-4
140. Orriols L, Gaillard J, Lapeyre-Mestre M, Roussin A. Evaluation of abuse and dependence on drugs used for selfmedication: a pharmacoepidemiological pilot study based on community pharmacies in France. Drug Saf. (2009) 32:859–73. doi: 10.2165/11316590-000000000-00000
141. Lessenger JE, Feinberg SD. Abuse of prescription and over-the-counter medications. J Am Board Fam Med. (2008). 21:45–54. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.01.070071. Erratum in: J Am Board Fam Med. (2008). 21:175.
142. Levy N, Mills P, Fawcett WJ. Avoiding an opioid crisis in the, U. K. BMJ. (2019) 364:l1033. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1033
143. NIDA. Opioid Overdose Crisis. National Institute on Drug Abuse (2021). Available from: https://www.drugabuse.gov/drug-topics/opioids/opioid-overdose-crisis (accessed March 04, 2021).
144. Van Hout MC, Norman I. Misuse of non-prescription codeine containing products: Recommendations for detection and reduction of risk in community pharmacies. Int J Drug Policy. (2016) 27:17–22. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.09.007
145. FDA. DA Limits Packaging for Anti-diarrhea Medicine loperamide (Imodium) to Encourage Safe Use. Food and Drug Administration (2019). Available from: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-limits-packaging-anti-diarrhea-medicine-loperamide-imodium-encourage-safe-use (accessed March 04, 2021).
Keywords: drug abuse, drug misuse, prescription drug misuse, pharming, drug diversion, over the counter drug misuse, addiction, OTC
Citation: Schifano F, Chiappini S, Miuli A, Mosca A, Santovito MC, Corkery JM, Guirguis A, Pettorruso M, Di Giannantonio M and Martinotti G (2021) Focus on Over-the-Counter Drugs' Misuse: A Systematic Review on Antihistamines, Cough Medicines, and Decongestants. Front. Psychiatry 12:657397. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.657397
Received: 22 January 2021; Accepted: 15 March 2021;
Published: 07 May 2021.
Edited by:
Nicolas Simon, Aix Marseille Université, FranceReviewed by:
Nicolas Franchitto, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, FranceOussama Kebir, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), France
Copyright © 2021 Schifano, Chiappini, Miuli, Mosca, Santovito, Corkery, Guirguis, Pettorruso, Di Giannantonio and Martinotti. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Stefania Chiappini, c3RlZmFuaWFjaGlhcHBpbmk5JiN4MDAwNDA7Z21haWwuY29t