Ana Ghenciulescu
Rebecca J. Park
Philip W. J. Burnet- 1Oxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- 2Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
The human gut microbiome is emerging as a key modulator of homeostasis, with far-reaching implications for various multifactorial diseases, including anorexia nervosa (AN). Despite significant morbidity and mortality, the underlying mechanisms of this eating disorder are poorly understood, but the classical view defining AN as a purely psychiatric condition is increasingly being challenged. Accumulating evidence from comparative studies of AN and healthy fecal microbial composition reveals considerable low divergence and altered taxonomic abundance of the AN gut microbiome. When integrated with preclinical data, these findings point to a significant role of the gut microbiome in AN pathophysiology, via effects on host energy metabolism, intestinal permeability, immune function, appetite, and behavior. While complex causal relationships between genetic risk factors, dietary patterns and microbiome, and their relevance for AN onset and perpetuation have not been fully elucidated, preliminary clinical studies support the use of microbiome-based interventions such as fecal microbiota transplants and probiotics as adjuvants to standard AN therapies. Future research should aim to move from observational to mechanistic, as dissecting how specific microbial taxa interact with the host to impact the development of AN could help design novel therapeutic approaches that more effectively address the severe comorbidities and high relapse rate of this serious disorder.
Introduction
Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a complex and debilitating eating disorder characterized by a distorted body image and extreme dietary restriction, accompanied by severe weight loss and high psychiatric comorbidity (1). Despite having the highest mortality rate of all psychiatric disorders (2), the development of effective, evidence-based treatments has been hindered by a poor understanding of its etiology, which likely involves a complex interplay between genetic and environmental factors (3). Recent evidence from large-scale genome-wide association studies has revealed significant correlations between AN and various metabolic factors, highlighting the importance of reconceptualising AN as a metabo-psychiatric disorder (4, 5). Expanding our horizons beyond a narrow, brain-centric approach to AN might thus provide novel insights into the fundamental mechanisms behind its development, maintenance, and persistence. An emerging avenue of AN research involves the gut microbiome, which is increasingly being acknowledged as a key interface for gene-environment interaction, with important implications for both health and disease (6). The human gastrointestinal tract harbors an abundant and diverse microbial ecosystem, defined as the gut microbiome, forming an evolutionary-driven symbiotic relationship important in maintaining host homeostasis. Over the past decade, advances in metagenomic sequencing technologies and proteomics have enabled the in-depth interrogation of the composition and function of these microbial communities. Compelling evidence supports the involvement of intestinal bacteria in core features of AN, including appetite and weight regulation (7), as well as in its comorbid symptoms, such as altered mood (8) and gastrointestinal symptomatology (9), through a variety of immune, neuroendocrine and metabolic pathways. Moreover, since the composition of these microbial communities is known to be vulnerable to chronic environmental perturbations, such as changes in dietary patterns (10), deviations in the gut microbiome of AN patients from that of healthy individuals are to be expected. Indeed, a growing body of literature points to an association between AN and profound gut microbiome imbalances. This review will evaluate these preliminary clinical findings which, when integrated with evidence from various animal models, shed light on dynamic changes in host-microbiome interactions that may play protective or detrimental roles over the course of AN and may inform future intervention strategies.
Dysbiosis in AN Patients
Several cross-sectional studies have revealed microbial alterations when comparing stool samples from AN patients and healthy, normal-weight participants (summarized in Table 1). However, results reported so far have been heterogenous, and difficult to interpret. This may be explained, in part, by differences in the methods used to characterize the microbiota (sampling, analysis techniques, statistical tests). Likewise, factors that may have contributed to compositional differences, such as patient dietary habits and the severity/duration of AN, were not consistently reported throughout the studies. Three investigations (14, 17, 19) found a reduction in α-diversity (measuring within-sample microbial diversity) in AN patients compared to controls. Loss of bacterial diversity is considered a hallmark of dysbiosis and is a recurrent finding in other related disease states, such as undernutrition (21), obesity (22), and IBD (23). Alcock et al. (24) hypothesized that a less diverse gut ecosystem may favor the predominance of “pathogenic” bacterial species, which would have more resources available to manipulate host dietary patterns. Interestingly, two of these studies also found that a lower diversity was significantly associated with depressive symptoms (17), as well as anxiety and eating disorder psychopathology (14) in AN. However, this correlation did not translate to subthreshold psychological variation in an independent sample of healthy individuals (25), suggesting that significant shifts in the microbiome-gut-brain axis might be specific to more extreme levels of psychopathology. Since it is difficult to draw conclusions about causality from these associative findings, insights about specific taxonomic differences might be more informative about the relationship between dysbiosis and AN. While not all studies describe the AN microbiota on species level extensively, and some reported findings are divergent, several patterns emerge. Their potential functional relevance is discussed in the sections below.
Table 1. Differences in gut microbiome composition in AN patients.
Gut Microbiota Adaptations to Starvation
A consistent finding across these studies was that AN microbial communities were enriched in the methanogenic archaeon Methanobrevibacter Smithii (11, 12, 15, 16) and its abundance was negatively correlated with BMI in two studies (11, 12). This may represent an adaptive response to prolonged caloric restriction, as methanogens can optimize the efficiency of bacterial fermentation (and thus of energy extraction) by metabolizing excess hydrogen from the gut. However, high levels of M. smithii have also been shown to slow intestinal transit (26), which may exacerbate symptoms of constipation often present in AN and interfere with weight restoration. Given the chronic caloric restriction and fluctuating food availability characteristic of AN (27), it is not surprising that microorganisms equipped to survive in a challenging, calorie-poor environment are more likely to thrive. In a pioneering study, Smith et al. (28) transferred stools from children with kwashiorkor, an acute form of protein-energetic malnutrition, to germ-free (GF) mice, which developed drastic weight loss and metabolic abnormalities compared to controls receiving transplants from healthy children. This suggested that, gut microbiota profiles during starvation may play a causal role in body weight regulation. While malnutrition secondary to AN develops more chronically, it is plausible that microbial communities selected by a low-energy gut environment might perpetuate AN, possibly by direct effects on weight loss and behavior (7).
Another possibility is that dysbiosis might be a risk factor for AN. A recent review by Mack et al. (29) considered whether microbe compositional changes in AN are the effect of host starvation or are causal, by comparing these profiles with those of other vertebrates under fasting conditions. However, little consistency was found across the literature regarding alterations in taxonomic abundance, which could reflect environmental and dietary differences across geographic regions. Furthermore, changes in relative abundance might not necessarily reveal all aspects of bacterial adaptations to starvation, as shown by a recent proteomic study (30) which demonstrated changes in gut microbiome metabolic activity in a mouse model of AN. Notably, increased levels of a major ATP-producing enzyme, phosphoglycerate kinase, were detected in the feces of mice with activity-based anorexia (ABA) compared to controls and were attributed to the order Clostridiales, which may be interpreted as an adaptive increase in energy harvest capacity by these bacteria to meet the demands of the host. To clarify the complex relationships between gut bacteria, starvation, and AN pathophysiology, future human studies should therefore focus on assessing longitudinal changes in the gut ecosystem and potentially include proteomic analyses to interrogate functional alterations of these communities as well.
Alteration in Bacterial Metabolites
Another important mechanism by which gut bacteria impact host metabolism is the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) by fermentation of non-digestible carbohydrates. SCFAs, including acetate, butyrate, and propionate, are thought to contribute to up to 10% of human energy requirements (31), and their fecal excretion is known to be reduced by a hypocaloric diet (10). Studies that measured fecal metabolite levels in AN patients reported reduced levels of SCFAs–particularly butyrate–(13, 15, 16, 18), compared to healthy subjects. Additionally, several carbohydrate-fermenting taxa belonging to the Firmicutes phylum (Roseburia, Clostridium, Eubacterium) were consistently underrepresented in AN gut microbiota (14–16, 19). In particular, the relative abundance of Roseburia spp. was correlated with decreased fecal butyrate levels (15, 16), which in turn were associated with increases in anxiety and depression scores of AN patients in one study (16). Mounting evidence suggests that SCFAs are not only key local regulators of gut homeostasis, but also influence host energy metabolism and appetite by modulating the intestinal production of feeding hormones (7), which may be of direct relevance to AN. However, it is still unclear whether these metabolites can also access neural circuits and directly affect psychopathology, especially since acetate is the only SCFA thought to reach the peripheral circulation (32). Further studies integrating sequencing data with measurements of both fecal and plasma SCFAs will hopefully lead to a more comprehensive understanding of the role that altered microbial metabolite production may play in core and comorbid features of AN.
Intestinal Permeability and Immune Mechanisms
Decreased availability of colonic butyrate may also lead to an inflammation-mediated disruption of the intestinal barrier (33). Several studies indicate that decreased carbohydrate-fermenters in AN is also accompanied by a shift toward mucin-degrading microorganisms (e.g. Verrucomicrobia, Bifidobacteria) (14, 15). The expansion of these slow-growing species is likely favored by the delayed colonic transit commonly occurring in AN (34) and, especially in a nutrient-deficient environment, they survive by digesting the protective intestinal mucus layer. Gut microbiota alterations observed in AN may thus contribute to increased intestinal permeability, facilitating the translocation of bacterial products into the systemic circulation. This can lead to aberrant immune responses, such as the development of a chronic state of low-grade inflammation, which is increasingly acknowledged to contribute to psychiatric pathology (35). Indeed, increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines have been found in acute AN (36), but it unclear whether this is a consequence of dysbiosis, or whether other factors, such as starvation-induced stress, upregulate inflammatory pathways and exacerbate intestinal dysfunction (37).
A “leaky gut” is also thought to underlie the elevated risk for autoimmune diseases found in AN (38). Interestingly, increased abundance of autoantibodies against appetite modulating neuropeptides, such as α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH), have been identified in AN (39, 40). Proteomic studies subsequently revealed that ClpB, a heat-shock protein produced by the commensal Escherichia coli, has sequence homology with α-MSH (41) and is also elevated in eating disorders (42). This led to the hypothesis of a microbial origin of α-MSH auto-antibodies. These are thought to arise via cross-reactivity with ClpB traversing the intestinal barrier and might play a causative role in AN by interfering with central satiety pathways (43). Indeed, increases in the family Enterobacteriaceae (or E. coli specifically) have been detected in stool samples from AN patients (12, 16, 19). However, while increased colonic permeability has been demonstrated in mice with experimentally-induced AN (44), confirmation in human subjects is lacking (45). It therefore remains unknown to what extent gut bacteria-driven molecular mimicry and barrier disruption contribute to the dysregulation of appetite in AN, but it is plausible that this pathway could precipitate characteristic behavioral manifestations, at least in a subset of AN patients (46).
Mechanistic Insights into Psychobehavioural Symptoms of AN
It is difficult to disentangle cause from effect based on findings from the observational studies described so far, and it remains unclear whether and how the dysbiosis observed in AN patients contributes to pathophysiology. In a recent study, Hata et al. (20) were the first to address this by reconstituting gnotobiotic mice with microbiota derived from AN patients (gAN). Compared to GF mice who received transplants from healthy controls (gHC), gAN mice exhibited poorer weight gain and a lower food efficiency ratio, which was correlated with the abundance of several bacterial genera previously found to be altered in AN patients (Clostridium; Bifidobacterium) (13–16). In addition, AN-derived microbiota appeared to induce anxious and compulsive-like behavior in the recipient mice, which were inversely correlated with both the fecal abundance of Bacteroides and brainstem 5-HT levels. Both parameters were also lower overall in gAN mice compared to age-matched gHC. Further, the compulsive phenotype was reversed upon probiotic treatment with B. vulgatus, a predominant species of the Bacteroides fragilis group [reported to be less abundant in AN by Morita et al. (13)]. Although the sample size was small, these initial findings provide more convincing evidence for a causal role of AN-specific microbiota alterations in key traits of the disorder.
AN patients typically display OCD-like behaviors such as obsessionality, compulsivity and anxiety (1) mainly surrounding food and body image. These behaviors are thought to be driven by similar mechanisms in the two disorders, which also share a significant genetic overlap (47), and are alleviated by serotonin-modulating medication (such as SSRIs) in the case of OCD (48). However, while a serotonergic dysfunction is likely also involved in AN pathogenesis (49), SSRIs have limited effectiveness in the treatment of this eating disorder (50), especially in children and adolescents (51). This could be explained by low serotonin metabolism in the acute phase of AN, probably related to a shortage of its amino acid precursor tryptophan as a result of dietary restriction (52). An influential study by Yano et al. (53) demonstrated that intestinal bacteria play a key role in the metabolism of tryptophan by enterochromaffin cells, which accounts for ~90% of the body's serotonin synthesis. Colonization of GF mice with spore-forming Clostridium microbes from healthy humans completely restored serum serotonin levels, providing proof-of-principle that serotonin availability can be manipulated upstream, at the level of gut microbiota. However, Bacteroides species, including those form the B. fragilis group, had no effect on host peripheral serotonin (53). Therefore, concerning the AN transplantation study by Hata et al. it is unlikely that B. vulgaris exerted its protective effects against the compulsive phenotype by directly affecting serotonin synthesis. Considering it was administered to gAN mice throughout the weaning period, the probiotic strain probably had collateral effects on the dynamics of the AN-derived microbial ecosystem, shifting its composition toward a more “beneficial” profile. Further research is thus needed to clarify which bacterial species altered in AN contribute to modifications in neurotransmitter availability, whether these effects are indeed related to relevant behavioral manifestations and how to optimally exploit the microbiota to address features of AN refractory to pharmacological treatment.
Implications for Treatment
These converging preclinical and clinical findings have encouraged a number of interventional studies investigating the potential of microbiome-based therapies for AN patients. Nutritional rehabilitation is the standard treatment for AN, but current refeeding regimens are often accompanied by severe GI distress (such as gastric-duodenal ulcers) and high rates of weight relapse (54). In addition, studies that followed the change in gut microbiome composition of AN patients over the course of renutrition reported that weight gain did not restore bacterial diversity to levels comparable to normal weight controls (14, 15), suggesting that dysbiosis might persist beyond weight recovery and potentially contribute to relapse. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from healthy donors is currently being explored as a potential strategy for re-establishing a diverse microbiota and improving the outcomes of nutritional rehabilitation. Two recently published case studies (55, 56) of FMT in AN patients showed promising results, with improvements in gut barrier function, microbiota composition and weight gain, and further FMT studies in larger cohorts are underway. However, the underlying assumption of FMT and its therapeutic potential remains a topic of debate, mainly as there is still no consensus over what constitutes a “healthy” microbiota profile. As the optimal composition is probably different for each individual (57), extensive population-based evidence describing microbiota variations in health and disease will be necessary before establishing appropriate screening parameters of donor-recipient compatibility.
Probiotics are another, less invasive approach for manipulating the gut microbiome, and preliminary clinical evidence suggests that oral administration of particular bacterial strains could have beneficial effects on mood (58) and gastrointestinal function (59). Such results have generated interest in the potential use of probiotic supplementation as a co-adjuvant to standard AN therapy, as they could help tackle comorbidities that often complicate recovery.
Conclusions
Although gut microbiome research in AN is still in its infancy, the evidence supports a key role of intestinal dysbiosis, marked by perturbations in diversity and taxonomic composition, in both somatic and psychological manifestations of this complex, multifactorial disorder (as summarized in Figure 1). However, it remains unclear whether these microbial changes observed in AN patients are a non-specific consequence of chronic caloric restriction, or a causative factor. Microbial adaptations to new, challenging contexts, such as the starvation state characteristic of AN, may occur at the expense of host fitness and act as a reinforcing mechanism for the underlying metabolic dysregulation and comorbidities that impact the course of the disease and complicate treatment. Moreover, findings highlighting the involvement of certain commensal species in the modulation of host appetite, either by direct effects on neuroendocrine secretion or via autoimmune mechanisms, raise the possibility of the gut microbiome directly contributing to the core behavioral phenotype of AN. High quality longitudinal data from AN cohorts, coupled with translational studies transplanting microbiota from anorectic patients to gnotobiotic animals, will be essential steps that will clarify potential causal mechanisms. Preliminary clinical studies serve as proof-of-concept that targeting the microbiome can alleviate AN symptoms and could thus be used as a safe complementary tool to standard nutritional interventions. However, in order to integrate the gut microbiome into a more comprehensive model of AN, a better understanding of how these biological mechanisms interact with psychosocial stressors in at risk individuals is needed. Further exploring the dynamics between gut microbiome, environment and genetics in the context of AN will hopefully guide the development of novel evidence-based interventions that either supplement current therapeutic strategies by enhancing beneficial interactions or interrupt microbe-driven positive feedback mechanisms that may underlie the poor treatment outcomes and chronicity of this debilitating eating disorder.
Figure 1. Model for gut microbiome involvement in AN pathophysiology.
Author Contributions
AG and PB made an equal contribution to the conceptualization and drafting of the manuscript and equal contributions to scientific content proof-reading. AG drafted the final version of the document and constructed the accompanying figure and table. RP provided a significant contribution to clinical content and proof-reading. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. (DSM-5®). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Publishing (2013). doi: 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
2. Arcelus J, Mitchell AJ, Wales J, Nielsen S. Mortality rates in patients with anorexia nervosa and other eating disorders: a meta-analysis of 36 studies. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (2011) 68:724–31. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.74
3. Schaumberg K, Welch E, Breithaupt L, Hübel C, Baker JH, Munn-Chernoff MA, et al. The science behind the academy for eating disorders' nine truths about eating disorders. Eur Eat Disord Rev. (2017) 25:432–50. doi: 10.1002/erv.2553
4. Duncan L, Yilmaz Z, Gaspar H, Walters R, Goldstein J, Anttila V, et al. Significant locus and metabolic genetic correlations revealed in genome-wide association study of anorexia nervosa. Am J Psychiatry. (2017) 174:850–8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16121402
5. Watson HJ, Yilmaz Z, Thornton LM, Hübel C, Coleman JRI, Gaspar HA, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies eight risk loci and implicates metabo-psychiatric origins for anorexia nervosa. Nat Genet. (2019) 51:1207–14. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0439-2
6. Goodrich JK, Davenport ER, Clark AG, Ley RE. The relationship between the human genome and microbiome comes into view. Annu Rev Genet. (2017) 51:413–33. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155532
7. van de Wouw M, Schellekens H, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Microbiota-gut-brain axis: modulator of host metabolism and appetite. J Nutr. (2017) 147:727–45. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.240481
8. Slyepchenko A, Maes M, Jacka FN, Köhler CA, Barichello T, McIntyre RS, et al. Gut microbiota, bacterial translocation, and interactions with diet: pathophysiological links between major depressive disorder and non-communicable medical comorbidities. Psychother Psychosom. (2016) 86:31–46. doi: 10.1159/000448957
9. Guinane CM, Cotter PD. Role of the gut microbiota in health and chronic gastrointestinal disease: understanding a hidden metabolic organ. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. (2013) 6:295–308. doi: 10.1177/1756283X13482996
10. David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN, Gootenberg DB, Button JE, Wolfe BE, et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature. (2014) 505:559–63. doi: 10.1038/nature12820
11. Armougom F, Henry M, Vialettes B, Raccah D, Raoult D. Monitoring bacterial community of human gut microbiota reveals an increase in Lactobacillus in obese patients and Methanogens in anorexic patients. PLoS ONE. (2009) 4:e7125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007125
12. Million M, Angelakis E, Maraninchi M, Henry M, Giorgi R, Valero R, et al. Correlation between body mass index and gut concentrations of Lactobacillus reuteri, Bifidobacterium animalis, Methanobrevibacter smithii and Escherichia coli. Int J Obes. (2013) 37:1460–6. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2013.20
13. Morita C, Tsuji H, Hata T, Gondo M, Takakura S, Kawai K, et al. Gut dysbiosis in patients with anorexia nervosa. PLoS ONE. (2015) 10:e0145274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145274
14. Kleiman SC, Watson HJ, Bulik-Sullivan EC, Huh EY, Tarantino LM, Bulik CM, et al. The intestinal microbiota in acute anorexia nervosa and during renourishment: relationship to depression, anxiety, and eating disorder psychopathology. Psychosom Med. (2015) 77:969–81. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000247
15. Mack I, Cuntz U, Grämer C, Niedermaier S, Pohl C, Schwiertz A, et al. Weight gain in anorexia nervosa does not ameliorate the faecal microbiota, branched chain fatty acid profiles, and gastrointestinal complaints. Sci Rep. (2016) 6:26752. doi: 10.1038/srep26752
16. Borgo F, Riva A, Benetti A, Casiraghi MC, Bertelli S, Garbossa S, et al. Microbiota in anorexia nervosa: The triangle between bacterial species, metabolites and psychological tests. PLoS ONE. (2017) 12:e0179739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179739
17. Mörkl S, Lackner S, Müller W, Gorkiewicz G, Kashofer K, Oberascher A, et al. Gut microbiota and body composition in anorexia nervosa inpatients in comparison to athletes, overweight, obese, and normal weight controls. Int J Eat Disord. (2017) 50:1421–31. doi: 10.1002/eat.22801
18. Speranza E, Cioffi I, Santarpia L, Del Piano C, De Caprio C, Naccarato M, et al. Fecal short chain fatty acids and dietary intake in italian women with restrictive anorexia nervosa: a pilot study. Front Nutr. (2018) 5:119. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2018.00119
19. Hanachi M, Manichanh C, Schoenenberger A, Pascal V, Levenez F, et al. Altered host-gut microbes symbiosis in severely malnourished anorexia nervosa (AN) patients undergoing enteral nutrition: an explicative factor of functional intestinal disorders? Clin Nutr. (2019) 38:2304–10. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.10.004
20. Hata T, Miyata N, Takakura S, Yoshihara K, Asano Y, et al. The gut microbiome derived from norexia nervosa patients impairs weight gain and behavioral performance in female mice. Endocrinology. (2019) 160:2441–52. doi: 10.1210/en.2019-00408
21. Genton L, Cani PD, Schrenzel J. Alterations of gut barrier and gut microbiota in food restriction, food deprivation and protein-energy wasting. Clin Nutr. (2015) 34:341–9. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.10.003
22. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature. (2006) 444:1027–31. doi: 10.1038/nature05414
23. Kostic AD, Xavier RJ, Gevers D. The microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease: Current status and the future ahead. Gastroenterology. (2014) 146:1489–99. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.02.009
24. Alcock J, Maley C, Aktipis CA. Is eating behavior manipulated by the gastrointestinal microbiota? Evolutionary pressures and potential mechanisms. BioEssays. (2014) 36:940–9. doi: 10.1002/bies.201400071
25. Kleiman SC, Bulik-Sullivan EC, Glenny EM, Zerwas SC, Huh EY, Tsilimigras MC, et al. The gut-brain axis in healthy females: Lack of significant association between microbial composition and diversity with psychiatric measures. PLoS ONE. (2017) 12:e0170208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170208
26. Kim G, Deepinder F, Morales W, Hwang L, Weitsman S, Chang C, et al. Methanobrevibacter smithii is the predominant methanogen in patients with constipation-predominant IBS and methane on breath. Dig Dis Sci. (2012) 57:3213–8. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2197-1
27. Chiurazzi C, Cioffi I, De Caprio C, De Filippo E, Marra M, Sammarco R, et al. Adequacy of nutrient intake in women with restrictive anorexia nervosa. Nutrition. (2017) 38:80–4. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2017.02.004
28. Smith MI, Yatsunenko T, Manary MJ, Trehan I, Mkakosya R, Cheng J, et al. Gut microbiomes of Malawian twin pairs discordant for kwashiorkor. Science. (2013) 339:548–54. doi: 10.1126/science.1229000
29. Mack I, Penders J, Cook J, Dugmore J, Mazurak N, Enck P. Is the impact of starvation on the gut microbiota specific or unspecific to anorexia nervosa? A narrative review based on a systematic literature search. Curr Neuropharmacol. (2018) 16:1131–49. doi: 10.2174/1570159x16666180118101354
30. Breton J, Legrand R, Achamrah N, Chan P, do Rego JL, do Rego JC, et al. Proteome modifications of gut microbiota in mice with activity-based anorexia and starvation: role in ATP production. Nutrition. (2019) 67–68:110557. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2019.110557
31. Bergman EN. Energy contributions of volatile fatty acids from the gastrointestinal tract in various species. Physiol Rev. (1990) 70:567–90. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1990.70.2.567
32. Müller M, Hernández MAG, Goossens GH, Reijnders D, Holst JJ, Jocken JWE, et al. Circulating but not faecal short-chain fatty acids are related to insulin sensitivity, lipolysis and GLP-1 concentrations in humans. Sci Rep. (2019) 9:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48775-0
33. Knudsen KEB, Lærke HN, Hedemann MS, Nielsen TS, Ingerslev AK, et al. Impact of diet-modulated butyrate production on intestinal barrier function and inflammation. Nutrients. (2018) 10:1499. doi: 10.3390/nu10101499
34. Vandeputte D, Falony G, Vieira-Silva S, Tito RY, Joossens M, Raes J. Stool consistency is strongly associated with gut microbiota richness and composition, enterotypes and bacterial growth rates. Gut. (2016) 65:57–62. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309618
35. Miller AH. Beyond depression: the expanding role of inflammation in psychiatric disorders. World Psychiatry. (2020) 19:108–9. doi: 10.1002/wps.20723
36. Dalton B, Bartholdy S, Robinson L, Solmi M, Ibrahim MAA, Breen G, et al. A meta-analysis of cytokine concentrations in eating disorders. J Psychiatr Res. (2018) 103:252–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.06.002
37. Rantala MJ, Luoto S, Krama T, Krams I. Eating disorders: An evolutionary psychoneuroimmunological approach. Front Psychol. (2019) 10:2200. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02200
38. Raevuori A, Haukka J, Vaarala O, Suvisaari JM, Gissler M, Grainger M, et al. The increased risk for autoimmune diseases in patients with eating disorders. PLoS ONE. (2014) 9:e104845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104845
39. Fetissov SO, Hallman J, Oreland L, Klinteberg B, Grenbäck E, Hulting AL, et al. Autoantibodies against α-MSH, ACTH, and LHRH in anorexia and bulimia nervosa patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2002) 99:17155–60 doi: 10.1073/pnas.222658699
40. Fetissov SO, Hamze Sinno M, Coëffier M, Bole-Feysot C, Ducrotté P, Hökfelt T, et al. Autoantibodies against appetite-regulating peptide hormones and neuropeptides: putative modulation by gut microflora. Nutrition. (2008) 24:348–59. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2007.12.006
41. Tennoune N, Chan P, Breton J, Legrand R, Chabane YN, Akkermann K, et al. Bacterial ClpB heat-shock protein, an antigen-mimetic of the anorexigenic peptide α-MSH, at the origin of eating disorders. Transl Psychiatry. (2014) 4:e458. doi: 10.1038/tp.2014.98
42. Breton J, Legrand R, Akkermann K, Järv A, Harro J, Déchelotte P, et al. Elevated plasma concentrations of bacterial ClpB protein in patients with eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord. (2016) 49:805–8. doi: 10.1002/eat.22531
43. Lucas N, Legrand R, Bôle-Feysot C, Breton J, Coëffier M, Akkermann K, et al. Immunoglobulin G modulation of the melanocortin 4 receptor signaling in obesity and eating disorders. Translational Psychiatry. (2019) 9:87. doi: 10.1038/s41398-019-0422-9
44. Jésus P, Ouelaa W, François M, Riachy L, Guérin C, Aziz M, et al. Alteration of intestinal barrier function during activity-based anorexia in mice. Clin Nutr. (2014) 33:1046–53. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.11.006
45. Mörkl S, Lackner S, Meinitzer A, Lehofer M, Halwachs B, Gorkiewicz G, et al. Gut microbiota, dietary intakes and intestinal permeability reflected by serum zonulin in women. Eur J Nutr. (2018) 57:2985–97. doi: 10.1007/s00394-018-1784-0
46. Fetissov SO, Hökfelt T. On the origin of eating disorders: altered signaling between gut microbiota, adaptive immunity and the brain melanocortin system regulating feeding behavior. Curr Opin Pharmacol. (2019) 48:82–91. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2019.07.004
47. Yilmaz Z, Halvorsen M, Bryois J, Yu D, Thornton LM, Zerwas S, et al. Examination of the shared genetic basis of anorexia nervosa and obsessive–compulsive disorder. Mol Psychiatry. (2018) 25:2036–46. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0115-4
48. Fineberg NA, Brown A, Reghunandanan S, Pampaloni I. Evidence-based pharmacotherapy of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. (2012) 15:1173–91. doi: 10.1017/S1461145711001829
49. Bailer UF, Kaye WH. Serotonin: imaging findings in eating disorders. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. (2011) 6:59–79. doi: 10.1007/7854_2010_78
50. Marvanova M, Gramith K. Role of antidepressants in the treatment of adults with anorexia nervosa. Ment Heal Clin. (2018) 8:127–37. doi: 10.9740/mhc.2018.05.127
51. Mairs R, Nicholls D. Assessment and treatment of eating disorders in children and adolescents. Arch Dis Child. (2016) 101:1168–75. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309481
52. Kaye WH, Fudge JL, Paulus M. New insights into symptoms and neurocircuit function of anorexia nervosa. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2009) 10:573–84. doi: 10.1038/nrn2682
53. Yano JM, Yu K, Donaldson GP, SHastri GG, Ann P, Ma L, et al. Indigenous bacteria from the gut microbiota regulate host serotonin biosynthesis. Cell. (2015) 161:264–76. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.047
54. Zipfel S, Giel KE, Bulik CM, Hay P, Schmidt U. Anorexia nervosa: aetiology, assessment, and treatment. Lancet Psychiatry. (2015) 2:1099–111. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00356-9
55. Prochazkova P, Roubalova R, Dvorak J, Tlaskalova-Hogenova H, Cermakova M, Tomasova P, et al. Microbiota, microbial metabolites, and barrier function in a patient with anorexia nervosa after fecal microbiota transplantation. Microorganisms. (2019) 7:338. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7090338
56. De Clercq NC, Frissen MN, Davids M, Groen AK, Nieuwdorp M. Weight gain after fecal microbiota transplantation in a patient with recurrent underweight following clinical recovery from anorexia nervosa. Psychother Psychosom. (2019) 88:52–4. doi: 10.1159/000495044
57. Rinninella E, Raoul P, Cintoni M, Franceschi F, Abele G, Miggiano D, et al. What is the healthy gut microbiota composition? A changing ecosystem across age, environment, diet, and diseases. Microorganisms. (2019) 7:14. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7010014
58. Liu RT, Walsh RFL, Sheehan AE. Prebiotics and probiotics for depression and anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2019) 102:13–23. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.03.023
Keywords: starvation, microbiota, gut-brain axis, metabolites, dysbiosis, treatment
Citation: Ghenciulescu A, Park RJ and Burnet PWJ (2021) The Gut Microbiome in Anorexia Nervosa: Friend or Foe? Front. Psychiatry 11:611677. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.611677
Received: 30 September 2020; Accepted: 23 November 2020;
Published: 12 January 2021.
Edited by:
Ulrike Margarete Elisabeth Schulze, University of Ulm, GermanyReviewed by:
Sergueï O. Fetissov, Université de Rouen, FranceKarl Bechter, University of Ulm, Germany
Copyright © 2021 Ghenciulescu, Park and Burnet. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Philip W. J. Burnet, cGhpbC5idXJuZXQmI3gwMDA0MDtwc3ljaC5veC5hYy51aw==