data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CORRECTION article
Front. Polit. Sci. , 04 January 2023
Sec. Peace and Democracy
Volume 4 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.1111389
This article is part of the Research Topic Israel/Palestine: The One-State Reality Implications and Dynamics View all 8 articles
This article is a correction to:
Annexation in right-wing Israeli discourse—The case of Ribonut
A corrigendum on
Annexation in right-wing Israeli discourse—The case of Ribonut
by Lustick, I. S. (2022). Front. Polit. Sci. 4:963682. doi: 10.3389/fpos.2022.963682
In the original article, there were three typographical and syntax errors.
1. In Section The “sovereignty” campaign and journal, 8th paragraph, second sentence: the phrase “Elitzur served a secretary-general…” should read as “Elitzur served as secretary-general…”
2. In Section Implementing sovereignty: Where, when, and how, 4th paragraph, the third sentence should read as: “Avi Bell, a Professor of law at Israel's national religious Bar-Ilan University and a senior fellow at the Kohelet think tank, in 2017 advocated incorporating all of Judea and Samaria with the same legal authority and techniques used with respect to East Jerusalem and the Golan heights.”
3. In Section Sovereignty and Arabs, 20th paragraph, second sentence, the phrase “as different from Arabs living in Judea and Samaria but not in the “autonomies.”” should read as “as different from non-autonomous areas and their Arab populations.”
The author apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: sovereignty, Israel, annexation, Ribonut, discourse, one-state reality, Arabs, Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Citation: Lustick IS (2023) Corrigendum: Annexation in right-wing Israeli discourse—The case of Ribonut. Front. Polit. Sci. 4:1111389. doi: 10.3389/fpos.2022.1111389
Received: 29 November 2022; Accepted: 08 December 2022;
Published: 04 January 2023.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2023 Lustick. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ian S. Lustick, aWx1c3RpY2tAc2FzLnVwZW5uLmVkdQ==
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.