
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
EDITORIAL article
Front. Plant Sci. , 05 March 2025
Sec. Plant Physiology
Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1568614
This article is part of the Research Topic Regeneration of Plant Organs in Vitro and Its Mechanistic Basis View all 5 articles
Editorial on the Research Topic
Regeneration of plant organs in vitro and its mechanistic basis
Plant regeneration and the mechanisms involved are foundational to plant biology; investigating the development, differentiation, and regulatory mechanisms of plant organs can be done by utilizing in vitro culture techniques (Ikeuchi et al., 2016). In 1958, Steward (Steward et al., 1958) demonstrated that single cells derived from carrot phloem-induced callus tissue could regenerate into whole plants, while Skoog and Miller (Skoog and Miller, 1957) discovered that elevated auxin levels can stimulate root formation and elevated cytokinin levels promote shoot formation. These findings formed the basis of the totipotency theory of in vitro somatic plant cells. Leveraging this unique characteristic, researchers have developed methodologies to culture specific plant organs, such as leaf, root, stem, and flower, under controlled environmental conditions (Chen et al., 2016; Dai et al., 2022; Tymoszuk and Zalewska, 2014; Hosokawa et al., 1996). This methodology enables the investigation of internal and external factors, including nutrients, hormones, light, and temperature, which influence the formation and development of plant organs (Xu et al., 2023; Song et al., 2023). Furthermore, the exploration of signaling pathways, gene expression, and metabolic networks provided critical insights into the molecular basis of organ development. There are three primary plant regeneration pathways: tissue repair, de novo organogenesis, and somatic embryogenesis (Duclercq et al., 2011; Sugimoto et al., 2011). This research compiles innovative research articles and reviews that contribute to advancing the field.
There are various factors influencing plant regeneration, with plant growth regulators being among the most critical (Motte et al., 2014). Yan et al. optimized the culture conditions for each developmental stage of Brettschneidera sinensis; they found that the highest seed germination rate was achieved on Murashige and Skoog medium supplemented with 2.0 mg/L 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BA) and 0.2 mg/L 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA). A combination of 1.0 mg/L 6-BA and 0.1 mg/L NAA promoted optimal shoot regeneration, while woody plant medium (WPM) was most effective for adventitious shoot elongation. Additionally, 1/2 MS medium containing 2.0 mg/L indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), 1.0 mg/L NAA, and 20 g/L sucrose resulted in the highest rooting rate. Molecular marker analyses using inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) confirmed the genetic stability of regenerated plants. This study provides an effective technical framework for the conservation and propagation of Brettschneidera sinensis.
Brassinolide (BL), in addition to cytokinins and auxins, influence plant regeneration (Jia et al., 2019). Nie et al. investigated the effects of BL on somatic embryogenesis in Pinus koraiensis by applying varying concentrations of BL to callus tissues with different embryogenic potentials and assessing the physiological changes and hormone levels. Their findings demonstrated that callus tissues with different embryogenic capacities responded differently to BL. BL application stimulated the bioactivity of callus tissues, regulated cellular metabolism and hormone levels, reduced MDA (malondialdehyde) content, enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity, and influenced the phenylpropanoid metabolic pathway. Furthermore, the study identified the optimal BL concentrations for callus tissues with different embryogenic potentials, providing valuable insights for somatic embryogenesis in Pinus koraiensis and other conifers.
Metabolites play a critical role in plant regeneration (He et al., 2023). Chang et al. conducted a metabolomic and proteomic sequencing analyses on Platycladus orientalis cuttings from trees aged 5, 100, and 700 years. The results revealed that rooting rates and root numbers of cuttings from ancient trees were significantly lower than those from 5-year-old trees. Differentially accumulated metabolites (DAMs) in the phenylpropanoid and flavonoid biosynthesis pathways were more abundant in older trees, leading to lignification of the callus and inhibiting root formation. However, callus from 100-year-old cuttings showed significantly increased rooting rate. The wounding stimulated cell division and energy accumulation, while changes in associated metabolites facilitated the formation of adventitious roots. These findings offer a novel approach to addressing the challenges of propagating hard-to-root plants through cuttings.
The external environment plays a crucial role in regulating plant regeneration. Han et al. reviewed the effects of light on plant regeneration, emphasizing the significant and complex influences of light intensity, spectrum, and photoperiod. Light intensity requirements vary among plant species during de novo shoot organogenesis, with blue and red light promoting adventitious shoot regeneration. Photoperiod exerts its effects by influencing hormonal activity and photosynthesis. Appropriate light intensity and spectra (e.g., red light) enhance embryogenesis, while photoperiod also impacts embryo induction. Similarly, adventitious root regeneration is affected by light, with plant-specific variations in response. In summary, light regulates plant regeneration by modulating photoreceptor-mediated signal perception, hormone levels, metabolic pathways, and gene expression. By leveraging emerging technologies, further exploration of light-regulated plant regeneration processes will provide a new theoretical basis for optimizing regeneration techniques.
In conclusion, the studies compiled in this Research Topic provide a foundational basis for exploring plant regeneration and the key factors in molecular mechanisms that influence it.
YL: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. CL: Writing – review & editing. AS: Writing – review & editing.
We would like to express our gratitude to all the authors and reviewers who contributed to this Research Topic. Their collective efforts have made this compilation of cutting-edge research possible. We also thank the editorial team at Frontiers in Plant Science for their support throughout this process.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Chen, L., Tong, J., Xiao, L., Ruan, Y., Liu, J., Zeng, M., et al. (2016). YUCCA-mediated auxin biogenesis is required for cell fate transition occurring during de novo root organogenesis in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 67, 4273–4284. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw213
Dai, X., Wang, J., Wang, L., Liu, Z., Li, Q., Cai, Y. (2022). HY5 inhibits in vitro shoot stem cell niches initiation via directly repressing pluripotency and cytokinin pathways. Plant J. 110, 781–801. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15703
Duclercq, J., Sangwan-Norreel, B., Catterou, M., Sangwan, R. S. (2011). De novo shoot organogenesis: from art to science. Trends Plant Sci. 16, 597–606. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.08.004
He, X., Gu, Z., Zhang, G., Ye, L. (2023). Identification of metabolites associated with plant regeneration capacity of barley callus. Plant Growth Regul. 100, 71–83. doi: 10.1007/s10725-022-00937-3
Hosokawa, K., Nakano, M., Oikawa, Y., Yamamura, S. (1996). Adventitious shoot regeneration from leaf, stem and root explants of commercial cultivars of Gentiana. Plant Cell Rep. 15, 578–581. doi: 10.1007/BF00232456
Ikeuchi, M., Ogawa, Y., Iwase, A., Sugimoto, K. (2016). Plant regeneration: cellular origins and molecular mechanisms. Development 143, 1442–1451. doi: 10.1242/dev.134668
Jia, J., Zhang, Y., Feng, H. (2019). Effects of brassinolide on microspore embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration in pakchoi (Brassica rapa var. multiceps). Sci. Hortic. 252, 354–362. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.04.004
Motte, H., Vereecke, D., Geelen, D., Werbrouck, S. (2014). The molecular path to in vitro shoot regeneration. Biotechnol. Adv. 32, 107–121. doi: 10.1016/j.bioteChadv.2013.12.002
Skoog, F., Miller, C. (1957). Chemical regulation of growth and organ formation in plant tissues cultured in vitro. Symp Soc. Exp. Biol. 11, 118–130. doi: 10.1002/chin.199621020
Song, X., Guo, P., Xia, K., Wang, M., Liu, Y., Chen, L., et al. (2023). Spatial transcriptomics reveals light-induced chlorenchyma cells involved in promoting shoot regeneration in tomato callus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 120, e2310163120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2310163120
Steward, F. C., Mapes, I. I. M. O., Mears, K. (1958). Growth And organized development of cultured cells. II. organization in cultures grown from freely suspended cell. Am. J. Bot. 45, 705–708. doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1958.tb10599.x
Sugimoto, K., Gordon, S. P., Meyerowitz, E. M. (2011). Regeneration in plants and animals: dedifferentiation, transdifferentiation, or just differentiation? Trends Cell Biol. 21, 212–218. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.12.004
Tymoszuk, A., Zalewska, M. (2014). Biological factors affecting regeneration of adventitious shoots from in vitro isolated ligulate florets of chrysanthemum. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 13, 155–165.
Keywords: plant regeneration, mechanistic basis, plant growth regulator, metabolites, light
Citation: Li Y, Li C and Shahzad A (2025) Editorial: Regeneration of plant organs in vitro and its mechanistic basis. Front. Plant Sci. 16:1568614. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1568614
Received: 30 January 2025; Accepted: 14 February 2025;
Published: 05 March 2025.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Anna N. Stepanova, North Carolina State University, United StatesCopyright © 2025 Li, Li and Shahzad. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yun Li, eXVubGlAYmpmdS5lZHUuY24=
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.