94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
Lijie Xun1,2
Rong Huang1
Qiongyan Li2
Qingxin Meng1
Rui Su2Xiaoman Wu1Renbin Zhang3Linshu Li4
Xueyang Gong1
Kun Dong1*- 1Yunnan Provincial Engineering and Research Center for Sustainable Utilization of Honey Bee Resources, Eastern Bee Research Institute, College of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China
- 2Institute of Sericulture and Apiculture, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Mengzi, China
- 3Shaba State-owned Forest Farm of Tengchong, Forestry and Grassland Bureau of Tengchong, Tengchong, China
- 4Animal Husbandry Workstation of Tengchong, Agriculture and Rural Affairs Bureau of Tengchong, Tengchong, China
Plant specialized metabolites are species-specific compounds that help plants adapt and survive in constantly changing ecological environments. Nectar contains various specialized metabolites, essential for maintaining nectar homeostasis. In this study, we employed high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to compare the sugar composition between spoilage nectar and natural nectar, with further analysis of variations in color, odor, pH, and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) content. Microbial strains in Camellia reticulata nectar were isolated and identified using the spread plate method coupled with DNA sequencing. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was implemented to characterize metabolite differences between spoilage and natural nectars. Subsequent in vitro experiments were conducted to validate the effects of screened nectar metabolites on the isolated microbial strains. The results showed that some C. reticulata nectar could spoil and deteriorate, which disrupted nectar homeostasis and significantly reduced the pollination efficiency by pollinators. Spoilage nectar had significant differences in color, odor, sugar composition, pH, and H2O2 content compared to natural nectar. The number of microbial species and quantity in spoilage nectar were much higher. The H2O2 content in natural nectar could reach (55.5 ± 1.80) μM, while it was undetectable in spoilage nectar. A total of 15 distinct microbial strains and 364 differential metabolites were isolated and identified from two types of nectar. In vitro experiments demonstrated that H2O2 could inhibit all the bacteria in C. reticulata nectar except Serratia liquefaciens. 12-Methyltetradecanoic Acid inhibited Bacillus subtilis, Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens, and Rothia terrae, and Myristic Acid only inhibited Rothia terrae. The nectar metabolites screened in this study had no effect on the nectar specialist yeast Metschnikowia reukaufii. In conclusion, the findings of this study revealed that C. reticulata nectar regulates the growth of microorganisms through its metabolites to maintain nectar homeostasis and prevent spoilage. This study improves the understanding of the physiological mechanisms of C. reticulata in maintaining nectar homeostasis and provides theoretical support for controlling nectar diseases and sustaining the reproductive fitness of C. reticulata. Future research could focus on further exploring the complex interactions between different metabolites in C. reticulata nectar and a wider range of microorganisms. Moreover, the development of practical applications based on these findings, such as the development of natural preservatives for nectar-related products or the optimization of pollination efficiency in C. reticulata cultivation, could be an important area for future exploration.
1 Introduction
Almost 87.5% of the over 300,000 flowering angiosperms in the world require animal pollination (Ollerton et al., 2011). Additionally, 87 of the 115 major global food crops (about 76%) depend on animal pollination (Klein et al., 2007), a process supported by the nectar of pollinating plants (Roy et al., 2017). In addition to being rich in sugars, nectar contains various nutrients such as amino acids, proteins, lipids, organic acids, secondary metabolites, vitamins, and minerals (Nicolson, 2022; Roy et al., 2017). These sugars and nutrients, offered by plants as rewards to pollinators, facilitate pollination (Nepi et al., 2018).
Pollinators are not the only organisms that benefit from nectar. This carbohydrate-rich solution also serves as the ideal habitat for microbial growth and reproduction (Álvarez-Pérez et al., 2024). Normally, microorganisms can be introduced into nectar through airborne transmission or by direct contact with pollinators. Once introduced, the microorganisms grow rapidly by utilizing the nutrients available in nectar (Brysch-Herzberg, 2004; de Vega and Herrera, 2013; Pozo et al., 2009). The composition and abundance of nectar microorganisms are influenced by environmental factors (Samuni-Blank et al., 2014) and the species of flower visitors (Morris et al., 2020). Consequently, there are substantial differences in the species and quantities of nectar microorganisms across different plant species.
After colonization, microorganisms can significantly alter nectar’s physical and chemical properties. They have been reported to modify the temperature (Herrera and Pozo, 2010), viscosity (Matiashe et al., 2014), pH, H2O2 content, sugar composition and concentration (Canto and Herrera, 2012; Good et al., 2014; Lievens et al., 2015; Vannette et al., 2013), amino acid composition and concentration (Kevan et al., 1988; Peay et al., 2012), and odor (Goodrich et al., 2006; Raguso, 2004) of nectar. Some nectar microorganisms have also been reported to increase the nectar’s alcohol content (Nepi, 2017) These physical and chemical changes significantly affect nectar quality and disrupt nectar homeostasis. The changes in nectar characteristics can potentially reduce their attractiveness to pollinators, thereby altering their flower-visiting behavior and decreasing the reproductive fitness of the pollinating plants (Heil, 2011). However, the fact that a vast majority of plant nectar in nature does not deteriorate despite multiple pollinator visits suggests that nectar-secreting plants have evolved a range of biochemical mechanisms to protect nectar from microbial infections, thereby ensuring high-energy rewards for pollinators (Kessler and Baldwin, 2007).
Nectar requires an active defense system to maintain its homeostasis, combat the growth of harmful microorganisms, and protect its nutritional resources from microbial exploitation. Certain nectar traits are believed to exhibit antimicrobial activity. For instance, the high sugar concentrations in nectar create extreme osmotic pressure and high C:N ratios, which limit microbial growth (Herrera et al., 2010; Lievens et al., 2015). Additionally, antibacterial compounds, especially proteins and secondary metabolites, often protect nectar from microbial growth (Schmitt et al., 2021). For example, in response to microbial infection, Petunia hybrida nectar can trigger the extensive expression and secretion of S-ribonuclease, peroxidase, and chitinase in the nectaries to counter microbial stress (Hillwig et al., 2011). Similarly, apple nectar chitinase can enhance the resistance of apples to Erwinia amylovora, the pathogen responsible for fire blight (Kurilla et al., 2019). With strong antifungal activity, the major nectar protein of Brassica rapa is a non-specific lipid transfer protein, BrLTP2.1 (Schmitt et al., 2018).
Some nectar proteins do not directly inhibit bacteria but instead synthesize certain antibacterial substances to combat nectar microorganisms through their own enzyme activity. Tobacco nectar protein can synthesize H2O2, with concentrations reaching up to 4 mM, thereby protecting tobacco nectar from microbial invasion (Carter and Thornburg, 2004). In 2000, Adler proposed the hypothesis that secondary metabolites in nectar could inhibit the growth of nectar microorganisms (Adler, 2000). Since then, various secondary metabolites have been reported to exhibit antibacterial effects in environments beyond nectar (Barberis et al., 2023; Stevenson et al., 2017). However, direct evidence of the inhibition of nectar microorganisms by secondary metabolites in nectar remains limited (Block et al., 2019; Mueller et al., 2023), and the mechanisms by which nectar maintains microbial balance through secondary metabolites remain largely unclear (Heil, 2011). It is also unknown whether other metabolites of nectar play a role in maintaining nectar homeostasis, such as amino acids, sugars, or lipids.
Plants are natural experts in organic synthesis, being able to generate large numbers of specific metabolites with widely varying structures that help them adapt to variable survival challenges (Shen et al., 2023). As a unique product of plant physiological activities, nectar contains a wide variety of metabolites with complex compositions (Nicolson, 2022; Roy et al., 2017). However, most of the current researches on the antibacterial properties of nectar metabolites focused on a certain category or just a few known substances (Anjali et al., 2023; Fischer, 2020; Mueller et al., 2023). It is difficult to comprehensively understand the whole picture of nectar metabolites, which greatly hinders the further expansion and deepening of relevant research. Metabolomics is a research discipline that integrates the capabilities of several types of research including analytical chemistry, statistics, and biochemistry (Shen et al., 2023). The use of metabolomic methods enables unbiased and comprehensive detection and analysis of various metabolites in nectar, providing strategies for gaining a systematic understanding of quantitative changes in the levels of metabolites. On the one hand, it helps us discover new metabolites that may play a key role in the interaction between nectar and microorganisms. On the other hand, it also opens up a new path for revealing the physiological mechanisms by which nectar metabolites maintain nectar homeostasis.
C. reticulata is an evergreen arbor belonging to the genus Camellia of the family Theaceae. It is a unique woody oil tree species in Yunnan (Liu et al., 2023). Its seeds have a high oil content and is rich in unsaturated fatty acids, vitamin E, and has the effects of softening blood vessels and reducing blood lipids (Qin et al., 2024). It is also the original species of Yunnan camellia flower, and is of great scientific value for studying the origin, evolution, and genetic diversity of camellia plants (Xin et al., 2017). It is a rare species under second-class national protection of China. C. reticulata has the trait of self-incompatibility. The fruit-setting rate through wind-pollination is merely 3.54% (Li et al., 2024). Given that its blooming season occurs in winter, when the number of pollinating insects is extremely low, it mainly depends on birds for pollination. Nectar, a pivotal factor in attracting pollinators to pollinate C. reticulata, is central to its reproductive process. However, our investigations have revealed that during the flowering period of C. reticulata, issues such as nectar spoilage and premature wilting and dropping of flowers frequently occur. These problems pose a severe threat to the pollination efficiency and fruit-setting rate of C. reticulata. Previous research has demonstrated that the excessive proliferation of typical spoilage microorganisms is the primary cause of food spoilage (including nectar spoilage) (Gram et al., 2002; Madan et al., 2024; Vannette et al., 2013). Additionally, some studies have indicated that it is also a significant trigger for the pathological changes in nectary tissues (Wei et al., 1992; Wilson et al., 1990). Therefore, delving deep into the antibacterial mechanism of the nectar of C. reticulata holds vital importance for enhancing its pollination efficiency and ultimately boosting its yield.
Previous studies have demonstrated that plant nectar contains abundant antibacterial substances (Schmitt et al., 2021). It is therefore likely that C. reticulata must also possess antibacterial substances to maintain the stability of the chemical composition of nectar. However, this area remains unexplored. For this reason, this study mainly focuses on the following aspects: (1) Clarifying the physicochemical changes involved in nectar spoilage; (2) Isolating and identifying the microorganisms in the nectar of C. reticulata; (3) Identifying and screening antibacterial substances in the nectar of C. reticulata; (4) Examining the inhibitory effect of the antibacterial substances on nectar microorganisms. These findings will not only provide a scientific basis for understanding the physiological mechanisms that maintain nectar homeostasis in C. reticulata but also serve as a reference for exploring the interactions among plants, microorganisms, and pollinators.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Sampling information and sample collection
C. reticulata is a winter flowering plant with a blooming period roughly from mid-November to mid-March next year. The nectar of C. reticulata was collected in January 2024 from the germplasm resources conservation bank of C. reticulata (98°35’9.366”E, 24°57’25.456”N) at Shaba Forest Farm in Tengchong, Yunnan Province. Clear and odorless natural nectar was collected from healthy and undamaged flowers. Spoilage nectar, identified by its cloudy appearance and sour odor, was collected from flowers exhibiting tissue lesions. The collected nectar samples were transported to the laboratory on dry ice and stored at -80°C for future use.
2.2 Determination of the physicochemical properties of natural nectar and spoilage nectar
2.2.1 Measuring nectar color, odor, pH, and hydrogen peroxide content
Through visual observation and olfaction, the color, solution state, and odor of the natural and spoilage nectar were assessed. A pH meter (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) was used to measure the pH of the two types of nectar. H2O2 concentration was quantified using an H2O2 content assay kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). Briefly, 100 μL of nectar or an H2O2 standard solution was processed according to the instructions of the reagent kit. The absorbance was measured at 415 nm using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, CA, USA). The hydrogen peroxide concentration in nectar was calculated using the formula provided in the assay kit’s manual.
2.2.2 Determination of total sugar and sugar components in nectar
Nectar concentration was measured using a Digital sugar refractometer (GAO Tek, Toronto, Canada), with a Brix value in the range of 0% ~ 32%. A sugar standard (National Institute of Metrology, China) was dissolved in ultrapure water to prepare a standard curve solution, which was filtered using a 0.45 μm filter membrane. The nectar sample was diluted with ultrapure water to ensure that the final sugar concentration fell within the standard curve concentration range (0.5 mg/Ml ~ 2.0 mg/mL) and was then filtered with a 0.45μm aqueous filter membrane. The samples were analyzed using a High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) system (Shimadzu LC-10A). The samples were separated and detected using Shimadzu’s amino column (INERTSIL NH2 5um 4.6 mm × 250 mm) and an evaporative light scattering detector (Evaporation chamber temperature 50°C, gain 4, pressure 350 kPa).
The mobile phase A and B consisted of acetonitrile and water, respectively. The gradient program was as follows: 0 ~ 7 minutes: 20% of B; 7 ~ 8 minutes: Increase B from 20% to 25%; 8 ~ 18 minutes: B maintained at 25%; 18 ~ 19 minutes: Decreased B from 25% to 20%; 19 ~ 27 minutes: Maintained B at 20%. The flow rate, column temperature, and injection volume were set at 1mL/min, 35°C, and 20 μL, respectively. The retention time of the sugars in the samples was compared with the chromatographic peaks of the standards. The sugar content in the sample was calculated based on the standard curve linear regression equation and expressed in mg/mL nectar solution.
2.3 Counting, isolation, and identification of nectar microbial culture
1 mL of nectar was diluted in sterile 1 × Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS) to create serial dilutions ranging from 10 to 106 times. Next, 200 μL of the diluted sample was spread evenly on a Luria-Bertani (LB) agar medium plate, with each dilution repeated in triplicate. The plates were cultured at 30°C for 48 h to 72 h. The plates with colony count between 30 CFU/mL and 300 CFU/mL and no spreading colonies were selected for counting the total number of colonies. The nectar bacterial strains were classified based on their colony morphology. Single colonies were isolated and cultured in LB liquid medium at 30°C for 24 h to 48 h at 220 rpm. The strains were isolated and purified through repeated streaking and subculture based on the colony morphology. Next, the isolated and purified bacterial strains were subjected to 16S rRNA sequencing, while the yeast strains were subjected to the large-subunit ribosomal RNA (LSU rRNA) sequencing. The nectar microbial sequences obtained from 16S rRNA (V1-V9 variable region, Forward primer: 5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′, Reverse primer: 5′-TACGGCTACCTTGTTACGACT-3′) and LSU rRNA (D1-D2 variable region, Forward primer: 5′-GCATATCAATAAGCGGAGGAAAAG-3′, Reverse primer: 5′-GGTCCGTGTTTCAAGACGG-3′) sequencing were compared with the GenBank database using the BLAST tool on the NCBI website for homology analysis. DNA sequencing was performed on the isolated bacteria using an 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, US), following the sequencing method described by Jiang et al. (2006). The microbial species in nectar were identified based on the information of the known species with the highest homology. All obtained sequences have been deposited in GenBank (Supplementary Table S1).
2.4 Determination of the effect of nectar microorganisms on the pH of the medium
The isolated and purified single colonies were cultured in LB liquid medium at 30°C with shaking at 220 rpm until the Optical Density (OD) value of the culture medium was almost 1.0. The culture liquid was then added into fresh LB liquid medium at a ratio of 1:10 and incubated at 30°C with shaking at 220 rpm for 24 hours. After incubation, the cultures were centrifuged to obtain the supernatant. The pH of the medium was measured before and after adding the bacterial culture.
2.5 Widely targeted metabolome identification of nectar metabolites
For both natural nectar and spoilage nectar, three biological replicates are set in each group for widely targeted metabolome analysis.
2.5.1 Nectar metabolites extraction
1mL of nectar was freeze-dried under vacuum followed by the addition of 1000 μL of extraction solution (methanol: acetonitrile: water in a 1:2:1 volume ratio). The samples were vortexed and mixed for 30 seconds. Next, steel balls were added and the mixture was treated with a 45 Hz grinder for 10 minutes, and sonicated in an ice bath for 10 minutes. Following sonication, the sample was allowed to stand at -20°C for one hour, after which it was centrifuged at 4°C and 12000 rpm for 15 minutes. After centrifugation, 300 μL of the supernatant was taken and filtered through a 0.22 μm organic filter membrane into a 2 mL injection bottle. For quality control (QC), 10 μL from each sample was pooled to create QC samples for machine testing.
2.5.2 LC-MS/MS analysis and identification of nectar metabolites
The sample extracts were analyzed using an Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Ionization-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-ESI-MS/MS) system (UPLC, Waters Acquity I-Class PLUS; MS, Applied Biosystems QTRAP 6500+). The following analytical conditions were used: For UPLC, Waters HSS-T3 (1.8 µm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm) column was used. The mobile phase consisted of solvent A-pure water with 0.1% formic acid and 5 mM Ammonium acetate, and solvent B-acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid. The sample measurements were performed with the following gradient program: Initial 98% A, 2% B for 1.5 min; 1.5min ~ 5.0 min – Linear gradient to 50% A, 50% B.; 5.0 ~ 9.0 min - Linear gradient to 2% A, 98% B and held for 1min; 9.0 ~ 10.0 min - adjusted back to 98% A, 2% B and held for 3min. The flow velocity, column oven temperature, and injection volume were set at 0.35 mL per minute, 50°C, and 4 μL, respectively.
The effluent was alternatively connected to an ESI-triple quadrupole-linear ion trap (QTRAP)-MS. The ESI source operation parameters were as follows: The source temperature was 550°C and the ion spray voltage (IS) was 5500 V (positive ion mode)/-4500 V (negative ion mode). The ion source gases, gas I (GSI), gas II(GSII), and curtain gas (CUR) were set at 50, 55, and 35 psi, respectively. The medium was collision-activated dissociation (CAD). Instrument tuning and mass calibration were performed with 10 and 100 μmol/L polypropylene glycol solutions in Triple Quadrupole (QQQ) and Linear Ion Trap (LIT) modes, respectively. QQQ scans were performed as Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) experiments with nitrogen as the collision gas set to medium. DP (declustering potential) and CE (collision energy) were optimized for individual MRM transitions. A specific set of MRM transitions was monitored for each period according to the metabolites eluted within that period.
2.5.3 Data analysis
The original peak area data was normalized using the total peak area and subsequent analyses were conducted. The Principal component analysis and Spearman correlation analysis were employed to assess the repeatability of the samples within the group and the quantity control samples. The identified compounds were categorized and assigned pathway information using KEGG, HMDB, and LipidMaps databases. The difference multiples were calculated and compared according to the grouping information. A T-test was used to determine the significance of the differences (p value) of each compound. The R language package ropls was used to perform Orthogonal Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA) modeling, and the reliability of these models was evaluated by performing 200 permutation tests. The Variable Importance in Projection (VIP) value of the model was calculated using multiple cross-validation. The method of combining the difference multiple, the p value, and the VIP value of the OPLS-DA model was adopted to screen the differential metabolites. The screening criteria were the following: Fold Change (FC) > 1, p value < 0.05 and VIP > 1. The differential metabolites of KEGG pathway enrichment significance were calculated using a hypergeometric distribution test.
2.6 Validation of the effect of nectar metabolites on nectar microorganisms
Ten nectar metabolites exhibiting significant differences in expression between natural and spoilage nectar and demonstrated inhibitory effects on certain microorganisms (Table 1), along with hydrogen peroxide (undetectable in spoilage nectar, Table 2) were selected as candidate antibacterial substances. Antibacterial validation experiments were conducted on 15 nectar cultivable microorganisms (Table 3). Each strain was isolated, purified, inoculated into an LB liquid medium, and cultured for 24 hours. The cultures were diluted with PBS solution to 0.5 McFarland turbidity (approximately 108 CFU/mL) and diluted 1000-fold to prepare a bacterial suspension of approximately 105 CFU/mL. 100 μL of the diluted bacterial culture was spread evenly on LB agarose plates. After the bacterial suspension dried, an 8 mm sterile puncher was used to punch holes in the agar. Next, 100 μL of 500 μM nectar metabolites or 100 μL of 50 μM hydrogen peroxide were added to the holes to examine antibacterial activity. Refer to the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination method established by Andrews (2001) to determine the MIC of nectar metabolites.
Table 1
Table 1. Nectar metabolite used for antibacterial validation.
Table 2
Table 2. Comparison of the physical and chemical properties between natural nectar and spoilage nectar.
Table 3
Table 3. Validation of the inhibitory effect of nectar substances on cultivable microorganisms in nectar (mean ± SD).
2.7 Statistic analysis
The mean and standard deviation of the pH of nectar and LB medium, sugar concentration, and nectar microbial population were calculated using SPSS 19 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A p value < 0.05 was considered to be a statistically significant difference.
3 Results
3.1 Differences in the physicochemical properties of natural nectar and spoilage nectar
As shown in Figure 1, the natural nectar of C. reticulata is a colorless, transparent, and clear liquid, whereas spoilage nectar appears as a brown, opaque, and turbid liquid. Nectar spoilage results in a sour and pungent odor, which is accompanied by a decrease in H2O2 and pH. Additionally, it increases the total sugar, sucrose, and glucose contents, whereas decrease fructose and maltose levels (Table 2).
Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of natural nectar and spoilage nectar in C reticulata. (A) Natural nectar within the flowers; (B) Collected natural nectar (left) and spoilage nectar (right); (C) Spoilage nectar within the flowers.
3.2 Influence of nectar spoilage on flower tissue
The flowers of C. reticulata are bell-shaped, with pink petals, numerous stamens, and yellow anthers (Figure 2A). However, when the microorganisms proliferate excessively in the nectar of C. reticulata, the nectar rots and deteriorates. As shown in Figure 2B, pathogenic microorganisms would invade the flower tissue via the nectarthodes at the bottom of the filament, leading to flower tissue decay that begins at the base of the filament and gradually spreads throughout the flower. This process shortens the flower’s lifespan, causing it to wither prematurely (Figure 2C). Furthermore, spoilage nectar emits an unpleasant odor, deterring pollinators, such as bees and birds, thereby hindering the spread of pollen.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Effects of nectar spoilage on the flowers of C reticulata. (A) Healthy flower showing no lesions; (B) Flower showing early-stage lesions; (C) End stage of flower disease.
3.3 Counting the microbial number of natural and spoilage nectar in C. reticulata
The number of microorganisms in natural nectar was determined to be (2.28 ± 0.97) × 104 CFU/mL, using the plate colony counting method, while the number of microorganisms in spoilage nectar was (1.72 ± 0.61) × 108 CFU/mL. Evidently, the number of microorganisms in spoilage nectar was significantly higher than in natural nectar, p < 0.05.
3.4 Identifying the cultivable microorganisms in natural nectar and spoilage nectar
Six bacterial strains (Na-1 ~ Na-6) and one yeast strain (Y-1) were isolated from natural nectar, while 13 bacterial strains (S-1 ~ S-13) and one yeast strain (Y-2) were isolated from spoilage nectar. The 16S rRNA sequences of bacterial strains and the LSU rRNA sequences of yeast strains were analyzed using the BLAST tool on the NCBI website. The identified sequences were compared with the GeneBank database for homology analysis and the microbial species of nectar were determined based on the information of the known species with the highest homology (Table 4). Six bacterial strains from natural nectar were identified, representing 4 genera and 4 species, while 13 bacterial strains from spoilage nectar were identified, belonging to 10 genera and 12 species. Pseudomonas palleroniana and Rothia terrae were identified in both natural and spoilage nectar. The yeast species in both types of nectar was the nectar specialist yeast M. reukaufii. According to the BacDive database (https://bacdive.dsmz.de/), 7 bacterial species isolated from spoilage nectar were identified as plant pathogens, including Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens, Erwinia. amylovora, Lelliottia. amnigena, Pseudomonas palleroniana, Xanthomonas. arboricola pv. Pruni, Xanthomonas. campestris pv. Raphani and Xanthomonas. hydrangeae.
Table 4
Table 4. Identification of culturable microorganisms present in the nectar of C. reticulata.
3.5 Influence of nectar microorganisms on the pH of the medium
While natural nectar is inherently acidic, spoilage nectar has even lower acidity (Table 2), likely due to the presence of the nectar-inhabiting microorganisms. Measuring the pH of the LB media before and after adding microbial cultures revealed that most nectar isolates can lower the pH of the medium. Particularly, Leuconostoc suionicum and M. reukaufii reduced the pH of the culture medium by almost 3 pH units (Table 5).
Table 5
Table 5. Changes in pH of culture medium before and after microbial cultivation (mean ± SD).
3.6 Comparative analysis of differential metabolites between spoilage nectar and natural nectar
All of the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient among different QC samples are above 0.96, indicating a high correlation among these QC samples. Additionally, most of the points (the peak intensity of a QC metabolite) in the scatter plots are distributed along the diagonal, also indicating a good correlation among these QC samples (Figure 3A). These imply that the experimental data is of reliable quality, the stability and reproducibility of the instrument analysis are good, and the obtained data is highly credible and can be used for subsequent data analysis. PCA was initially conducted on the entire metabolome data set, to explore clustering in the samples. PCA score plots for nectar samples (Figure 3B) showed significant clustering of the natural nectar group (Na) and spoilage nectar group (S), indicating that samples from the spoilage group deviated from normal levels and exhibited metabolic disorders.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Quality-control analysis of nectar metabolome (A) and PCA of C reticulata nectar samples from different experimental groups (B).
This study detected 704 metabolites in nectar, with 364 metabolites showing differential expression between spoilage nectar and natural nectar (See Supplementary Table S2 for details of 364 differential metabolites). Of these, 196 metabolites exhibited increased levels in spoilage nectar, while 168 metabolites showed reduced levels compared to natural nectar (Figure 4). As shown in Figure 5, the differential metabolites were primarily categorized into organooxygen compounds, carboxylic acids and derivatives, fatty acyls, benzene and substituted derivatives, flavonoids, prenol lipids, and others. Furthermore, KEGG analysis categorized the differential metabolites into three primary metabolic pathways: Environmental Information Processing, Genetic Information Processing, and Metabolism. Additionally, 13 secondary metabolic pathways were identified, including but not limited to amino acid metabolism, biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites, and carbohydrate metabolism. Moreover, 74 tertiary metabolic pathways were found, including cysteine and methionine metabolism, Biosynthetic of various plant secondary metabolites, Pentose and gluconate interconversion and among others (Figure 6). The differential metabolites include a range of secondary metabolites, lipids, and antibiotics, which likely play a key role in nectar’s resistance to environmental stress and pathogenic microbial invasion.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Statistical analysis of differential metabolites in the C reticulata nectar. (A) Volcanic map of differential metabolites; (B) Columnar statistical chart of differential metabolites; (C) Log2FC density distribution map of differential metabolites; (D) VIP distribution map of differential metabolites.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Classification map of the top 20 major differential metabolites in C. reticulata nectar.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Major pathways associated with the differential metabolites of C. reticulata nectar, as revealed by KEGG database annotations.
3.7 Verifying the effect of nectar metabolites on nectar microorganisms
The antibacterial zone diameter and MIC values were used to evaluate the inhibitory effects of 11 nectar metabolites, including H2O2, on 15 microbial strains isolated from the nectar of C. reticulata. The results are illustrated in Table 3. H2O2 inhibited all cultivable nectar bacteria except S. liquefaciens. With a MIC of 1.6μM, it exhibited the strongest inhibitory effect on R. terrae. Among the tested metabolites, 12-Methyltetradecanoic Acid showed an inhibitory effect on B. subtilis, C. flaccumfaciens, and R. terrae, while Myristic Acid only inhibited R. terrae. However, none of the three substances had an inhibitory effect on M. reukaufii. Additionally, no inhibitory effects on cultivable nectar microorganisms were detected for the other 8 nectar metabolites.
4 Discussion
Nectar homeostasis is crucial for plant pollination (Nepi and Stpiczyńska, 2008). On the other hand, nectar spoilage inevitably loses the plant’s attractiveness to pollinators, ultimately leading to pollination failure. Consequently, understanding nectar ecology is fundamental to advancing pollination biology. Typically, nectar microorganisms are rarely beneficial to plants (Vannette, 2020). Microorganisms entering nectar are controlled by numerous biotic and abiotic factors, making it a multi-dimensional interaction web. Disruptions to any of these factors can destabilize these long-evolved plant-pollinator relations and the intricate interaction network involving multiple communities (Madan et al., 2024). Nectar spoilage is more likely caused by nectar bacteria than by nectar yeast (Vannette et al., 2013). Four bacterial species were isolated from the natural nectar of C. reticulata, while twelve species were identified in its spoilage nectar. Furthermore, the number of cultivable bacteria in spoilage nectar was (1.72 ± 0.61) × 108 CFU/mL, significantly higher than that in natural nectar, which was (2.28 ± 0.97) × 104 CFU/mL. Thus, both the diversity and the abundance of bacteria in spoilage nectar greatly exceeded that in natural nectar, which may be the main reason for the spoilage of C. reticulata nectar. Additionally, The excessive proliferation of pathogenic bacteria is likely the primary incentive for the nectary tissue lesion of C. reticulata. Pathogens can exploit the nectarthodes in nectaries to enter the plant body and cause plant diseases. For example, E. amylovora, the causative agent for fire blight, can grow in the nectar of various plant species, such as apples and pears. From there it can enter the nectaries to infect the plant vascular system, causing fire blight (Wei et al., 1992; Wilson et al., 1990). Furthermore, various plant pathogens have been identified in spoilage nectar, including C. flaccumfaciens, which causes wilting in dry beans (Osdaghi et al., 2020), and L. amnigena and P. palleroniana, both of which are known to cause potato soft rot (Osei et al., 2022). Similarly, X. arboricola pv.Pruni causes bacterial spot disease on peach trees (Garita-Cambronero et al., 2018) and is listed as a quarantine agent by the European Union, while X. campestris pv. Raphani and X. hydrangeae are reported to cause leaf spot disease in plants (Campigli and Rizzo, 2023; Cruz et al., 2015). These pathogens may contribute to the premature rotting and withering of C. reticulata flowers. However, this hypothesis is speculative based on the pathogenicity of the cultivable bacteria isolated from C. reticulata nectar. Further research is necessary to determine whether these pathogens are directly responsible for nectar spoilage and flower tissue lesions.
Nectar serves as the primary source of carbohydrates for pollinators and defensive symbionts. In varying proportions, sucrose, glucose, and fructose are the main solutes found in nectar (Chalcoff et al., 2006). Within a given species, the sucrose-to-hexose ratio and the total sugar concentration are relatively consistent and play a significant role in plant interactions (Petanidou, 2005). Flower visitors have been reported to prefer nectar with a certain sugar ratio. For example, hummingbirds, butterflies, moths, and long-tongued bees typically prefer nectar rich in sucrose, while short-tongued bees and flies favor nectar rich in hexose (Heil, 2011). Additionally, visitors also choose plants based on factors, such as color, aroma, and the taste of nectar (Vannette et al., 2013; Yan et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2012). The presence of microorganisms in nectar has been demonstrated to reduce sugar concentration, change sugar ratios and contribute to nectar spoilage (Canto and Herrera, 2012; Thompson, 2009). Interestingly, the concentration of total sugar, sucrose, and glucose in the spoilage nectar of C. reticulata is higher than that of natural nectar. This difference is likely due to the different sugar preferences of the microorganisms involved in nectar spoilage or the production of extracellular polysaccharides in certain microbial metabolic processes (Bazaka et al., 2011). Another possible explanation for the difference in sugar content between spoilage and natural nectar is that nectar secretion is a dynamic process (Zhang et al., 2023). As nectar spoilage leads to nectary tissue lesions, fresh nectar cannot be replenished in time. Consequently, the nectar becomes more concentrated due to water evaporation from the plant, which occurs when nectar is exposed to environmental factors like heat or air. In addition, the metabolic activity of the microbes that inhabit nectar also affects other nectar traits, such as pH, color, and odor (Rering et al., 2018; Vannette et al., 2013). These changes all can potentially reduce the pollinators’ access to plants (Heil, 2011). As shown in Table 5, most microorganisms in the nectar of C. reticulata can reduce the pH of the medium. Particularly, L. suionicum and M. reukaufii significantly reduce the pH of the medium, which is likely the key factor contributing to the lowering of the pH of spoilage nectar. C. reticulata, is a cross-pollinated plant that primarily relies on birds for pollination. Upon spoilage, the sugar composition, color, and odor of the nectar change significantly (Table 2). These alterations reduce the nectar’s attractiveness to pollinators, ultimately decreasing the pollination efficiency in C. reticulata plants.
Not all microorganisms that reach flowers are able to survive and colonize nectar, as they must overcome several layers of barriers. To begin with, there are physical barriers. The sugars (such as sucrose, glucose, and fructose), amino acids, and other small molecules present in nectar regulate its osmotic pressure. A high osmotic pressure environment can forcibly filter out microorganisms that enter nectar (Herrera et al., 2010). Changes in various small-molecule sugars and amino acids in spoilage nectar will surely disrupt the osmotic balance of the nectar (Supplementary Table S2). Second, there are biological barriers. Nectar is not a sterile environment and typically contains bacteria and fungi even before the flower buds open (Aleklett et al., 2014). Each species of nectar has its own specific microbial population (Fridman et al., 2012), with competitive exclusion favoring early arriving, faster growing, or inhibiting species (Fukami, 2015). Some microorganisms may be beneficial to nectar. For example, the metabolites of B. subtilis can inhibit the growth of M. reukaufii (Meng et al., 2024). We isolated B. subtilis from natural nectar, but not from spoilage nectar. The absence of Bacillus subtilis in spoilage nectar may have caused the nectar to lose a factor that inhibits the growth of M. reukaufii, accelerating the spoilage of the nectar. Lastly, there is a chemical barrier. In addition to being rich in various sugars, nectar contains several other substances, such as secondary metabolites, lipids, and reactive oxygen species, many of which have demonstrated antibacterial properties (Anjali et al., 2023; Fischer, 2020; Mueller et al., 2023). However, direct evidence of the antibacterial effects of these substances in nectar is still limited, and research on C. reticulata in this area is scarce.
In the process of nectar maintaining homeostasis, not only the proportions and contents of major components such as sugars need to remain relatively stable, but also the contents and types of secondary metabolites such as flavonoids, polyphenols, terpenoids and alkaloids in the nectar need to be kept in a stable state. These secondary metabolites have functions such as antioxidant (Lang et al., 2024; Shen et al., 2022) and antibacterial (Barati and Modarresi Chahardehi, 2023; Sharma et al., 2020) properties, playing an important role in protecting nectar from microbial invasion and oxidative damage. In C. reticulata, compared with the nectar in its natural state, the number of microorganisms in the spoilage nectar increases exponentially. According to the data in Supplementary Table S2, most of the flavonoids and polyphenols in the spoiled nectar show an upward trend, which may be related to the removal of superoxide radicals generated by the excessive reproduction of microorganisms in the nectar (He et al., 2023). However, most of the secondary metabolites of terpenoids and alkaloids with antibacterial activity, such as Ruscogenin and Crebanine in Table 1, showed a significant downward trend. The decrease in the content of these secondary metabolites is likely to be a key factor accelerating the spoilage of nectar.
The findings of this study revealed 364 differential metabolites between spoilage nectar and natural nectar (Figure 3). Among these, there were 120 secondary metabolites and 39 lipids. Quantitative analysis revealed that the H2O2 content in natural nectar was (55.5 ± 1.80) μM, but it was undetectable in spoilage nectar. As shown in Table 1, ten metabolites with known antibacterial activity, along with H2O2, were selected to investigate their effects on the microorganisms present in the nectar of C. reticulata. The results (see Table 3) indicated that H2O2 is the main antibacterial substance in the nectar of C. reticulata, capable of inhibiting most nectar microorganisms, though not all. This result is consistent with the findings of Mueller et al. ‘s study on antibacterial compounds in nectar (Mueller et al., 2023). Meanwhile, metabolites such as 12-Methyltetradecanoic Acid, Myristic Acid, and other nectar antibacterial substances (some identified but not yet verified) work alongside H2O2 to help maintain the nectar homeostasis of C. reticulata. The antibacterial effect of nectar metabolites represents an important defense mechanism formed by plants during long-term evolution. Through the synergistic effect of various antibacterial metabolites, this system plays a key role in ensuring plant reproduction and maintaining ecological balance. Future research should focus on exploring the synthesis and regulation mechanisms of antibacterial metabolites in nectar, the co-evolutionary dynamics between pollinators and microorganisms, and their potential ecological applications, to deepen our understanding of the complex interactions within plant ecosystems.
5 Conclusion
The findings of this study revealed that C. Reticulata nectar primarily relies on nectar antibacterial metabolites, especially H2O2, to regulate the population of nectar microorganisms and maintain nectar homeostasis. However, when the microorganisms overcome the physiological defense line of C. Reticulata nectar – namely the control exerted by bacteriostatic substances, their numbers can proliferate unchecked, leading to nectar spoilage and deterioration. Some pathogenic microorganisms can invade the nectarial tissues through the nectarthodes, causing flower tissue lesions, and disrupting the continuous secretion of substances that maintain nectar homeostasis through the nectarthodes. This imbalance in nectar ecology alters the color, odor, and chemical composition of nectar, hindering the mutual communication between C. Reticulata and pollinators, which ultimately affects the reproductive fitness of C. Reticulata. This study highlights the antagonistic effects of nectar antimicrobial metabolites on nectar bacteria, emphasizing the critical role of nectar homeostasis in supporting reproductive fitness in cross-pollinating plants.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
LX: Conceptualization, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. RH: Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft. QL: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft. QM: Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft. RS: Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft. XW: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Software. RZ: Investigation, Resources, Writing – original draft. LL: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Resources. XG: Writing – original draft, Data curation. KD: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (32060241 and 31572339), the China Agriculture Research System of the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (CARS-44-KXJ13), the Reserve Talents Training Program for Young and Middle-Aged Academic and Technical Leaders in Yunnan (2018HB041), and the Joint Special Foundation for Agricultural Basic Research in Yunnan (202301BD070001-228).
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the support of the Forestry and Grassland Bureau of Tengchong, Yunnan Province, and the Camellia reticulata Resource Bank at Shaba State-owned Forest Farm, Tengchong for their contributions to this project, as well as MJEditor (www.mjeditor.com) for their English editing services during the preparation of this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1557228/full#supplementary-material
References
Adler, L. S. (2000). The ecological significance of toxic nectar. OIKOS 91, 409–420. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910301.x
Aleklett, K., Hart, M., Shade, A. (2014). The microbial ecology of flowers: an emerging frontier in phyllosphere research. Botany 92, 253–266. doi: 10.1139/cjb-2013-0166
Álvarez-Pérez, S., Lievens, B., de Vega, C. (2024). Floral nectar and honeydew microbial diversity and their role in biocontrol of insect pests and pollination. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 61, 101138. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2023.101138
Andrews, J. M. (2001). Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 48 Suppl 1, 5–16. doi: 10.1093/jac/48.suppl_1.5
Anjali, Kumar, S., Korra, T., Thakur, R., Arutselvan, R., Kashyap, A. S., et al. (2023). Role of plant secondary metabolites in defence and transcriptional regulation in response to biotic stress. Plant Stress 8, 100154. doi: 10.1016/j.stress.2023.100154
Barati, M., Modarresi Chahardehi, A. (2023). “Alkaloids: The Potential of Their Antimicrobial Activities of Medicinal Plants,” in Medicinal Plants-Chemical, Biochemical, and Pharmacological Approaches. Eds. Oliveira, M., De Aguiar Andrade, E.H., Kumar, R., Mali, S. N. (IntechOpen, Rijeka). doi: 10.5772/intechopen.112364
Barberis, M., Calabrese, D., Galloni, M., Nepi, M. (2023). Secondary metabolites in nectar-mediated plant-pollinator relationships. Plants 12, 550. doi: 10.3390/plants12030550
Bazaka, K., Crawford, R. J., Nazarenko, E. L., Ivanova, E. P. (2011). “Bacterial Extracellular Polysaccharides,” in Bacterial Adhesion: Chemistry, Biology and Physics. Eds. Linke, D., Goldman, A. (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht), 213–226. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-0940-9_13
Bhowmick, S., Baptista, R., Fazakerley, D., Whatley, K., Hoffmann, K., Shen, J., et al. (2020). The anti-mycobacterial activity of Artemisia annua L is based on deoxyartemisinin and artemisinic acid. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2020.10.23.352500
Block, A. K., Yakubova, E., Widhalm, J. R. (2019). Specialized naphthoquinones present in Impatiens glandulifera nectaries inhibit the growth of fungal nectar microbes. Plant Direct 3, e00132. doi: 10.1002/pld3.132
Borges, A., Ferreira, C., Saavedra, M. J., Simões, M. (2013). Antibacterial activity and mode of action of ferulic and gallic acids against pathogenic bacteria. Microb. Drug Resist. 19, 256–265. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2012.0244
Brysch-Herzberg, M. (2004). Ecology of yeasts in plant–bumblebee mutualism in Central Europe. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 50, 87–100. doi: 10.1016/j.femsec.2004.06.003
Campigli, S., Rizzo, D. (2023). First Report of Xanthomonas hydrangeae Causing Leaf Spot on Oakleaf Hydrangea (Hydrangea quercifolia) in Tuscany (Italy). Plant Dis. 107, 2514. doi: 10.1094/pdis-11-22-2607-pdn
Canto, A., Herrera, C. M. (2012). Micro-organisms behind the pollination scenes: microbial imprint on floral nectar sugar variation in a tropical plant community. Ann. Bot. 110, 1173–1183. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs183
Carter, C., Thornburg, R. W. (2004). Is the nectar redox cycle a floral defense against microbial attack? Trends Plant Sci. 9, 320–324. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.05.008
Chalcoff, V. R., Aizen, M. A., Galetto, L. (2006). Nectar concentration and composition of 26 species from the temperate forest of South America. Ann. Bot. 97, 413–421. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcj043
Chen, X., Zhao, X., Deng, Y., Bu, X., Ye, H., Guo, N. (2019). Antimicrobial potential of myristic acid against Listeria monocytogenes in milk. J. Antibio. 72, 298–305. doi: 10.1038/s41429-019-0152-5
Cruz, J., Tenreiro, R., Cruz, L. (2015). First Report of Xanthomonas campestris pv. raphani Causing Leaf Spot Disease of Brassica oleracea in Portugal. Plant Dis. 99, 282. doi: 10.1094/pdis-07-14-0780-pdn
Deng, Y., Yu, Y., Luo, H., Zhang, M., Qin, X., Li, L. (2011). Antimicrobial activity of extract and two alkaloids from traditional Chinese medicinal plant Stephania dielsiana. Food Chem. 124, 1556–1560. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.08.011
de Vega, C., Herrera, C. M. (2013). Microorganisms transported by ants induce changes in floral nectar composition of an ant-pollinated plant. Am. J. Bot. 100, 792–800. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1200626
Dieuleveux, V., Lemarinier, S., Guéguen, M. (1998). Antimicrobial spectrum and target site of d-3-phenyllactic acid. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 40, 177–183. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(98)00031-2
Fischer, C. L. (2020). Antimicrobial activity of host-derived lipids. Antibiotics 9, 75. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9020075
Fridman, S., Izhaki, I., Gerchman, Y., Halpern, M. (2012). Bacterial communities in floral nectar. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 4, 97–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00309.x
Fukami, T. (2015). Historical contingency in community assembly: integrating niches, species pools, and priority effects. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. System. 46, 1–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160340
Garita-Cambronero, J., Palacio-Bielsa, A., Cubero, J. (2018). Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni, causal agent of bacterial spot of stone fruits and almond: its genomic and phenotypic characteristics in the X. arboricola species context. Mol. Plant Pathol. 19, 2053–2065. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12679
Good, A. P., Gauthier, M. P., Vannette, R. L., Fukami, T. (2014). Honey bees avoid nectar colonized by three bacterial species, but not by a yeast species, isolated from the bee gut. PloS One 9, e86494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086494
Goodrich, K. R., Zjhra, M. L., Ley, C. A., Raguso, R. A. (2006). When flowers smell fermented: the chemistry and ontogeny of yeasty floral scent in pawpaw (Asimina triloba: Annonaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 167, 33–46. doi: 10.1086/498351
Gram, L., Ravn, L., Rasch, M., Bruhn, J. B., Christensen, A. B., Givskov, M. (2002). Food spoilage—interactions between food spoilage bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 78, 79–97. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00233-7
He, Z., Li, Q., Xu, Y., Zhang, D., Pan, X. (2023). Production of extracellular superoxide radical in microorganisms and its environmental implications: A review. Environ. pollut. 338, 122563. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122563
Heil, M. (2011). Nectar: generation, regulation and ecological functions. Trends Plant Sci. 16, 191–200. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.01.003
Herrera, C. M., Canto, A., Pozo, M. I., Bazaga, P. (2010). Inhospitable sweetness: nectar filtering of pollinator-borne inocula leads to impoverished, phylogenetically clustered yeast communities. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 277, 747–754. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1485
Herrera, C. M., Pozo, M. I. (2010). Nectar yeasts warm the flowers of a winter-blooming plant. Proc. Biol. Sci. 277, 1827–1834. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2252
Hillwig, M. S., Kanobe, C., Thornburg, R. W., Macintosh, G. C. (2011). Identification of S-RNase and peroxidase in petunia nectar. J. Plant Physiol. 168, 734–738. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.10.002
Inoue, T., Kuroda, T., Ohara, N. (2012). 12-Methyltetradecanoic acid, a branched-chain fatty acid, represses the extracellular production of surfactants required for swarming motility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Jpn J. Infect. Dis. 65, 126–131. doi: 10.7883/yoken.65.126
Jeon, Y.-T., Jun, E.-M., Oh, K.-B., Thu, P. Q., Kim, S.-U. (2010). Identification of 12-methyltetradecanoic acid from endophytic Senotrophomonas maltophilia as inhibitor of appressorium formation of Magnaporthe oryzae. J. Korean Soc. Appl. Biol. Chem. 53, 578–583. doi: 10.3839/jksabc.2010.089
Jiang, H., Dong, H., Zhang, G., Yu, B., Chapman, L. R., Fields, M. W. (2006). Microbial diversity in water and sediment of Lake Chaka, an athalassohaline lake in northwestern China. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 3832–3845. doi: 10.1128/aem.02869-05
Kessler, D., Baldwin, I. T. (2007). Making sense of nectar scents: the effects of nectar secondary metabolites on floral visitors of Nicotiana attenuata. Plant J. 49, 840–854. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02995.x
Kevan, P. G., Eisikowitch, D., Fowle, S., Thomas, K. (1988). Yeast-contaminated nectar and its effects on bee foraging. J. Apicult. Res. 27, 26–29. doi: 10.1080/00218839.1988.11100777
Klein, A. M., Vaissiere, B. E., Cane, J. H., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Cunningham, S. A., Kremen, C., et al. (2007). Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceed.: Biol. Sci. 274, 303–313. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3721
Kurilla, A., Toth, T., Dorgai, L., Darula, Z., Lakatos, T., Silhavy, D., et al. (2019). Nectar- and stigma exudate-specific expression of an acidic chitinase could partially protect certain apple cultivars against fire blight disease. Planta 251, 20. doi: 10.1007/s00425-019-03303-2
Lang, Y., Gao, N., Zang, Z., Meng, X., Lin, Y., Yang, S., et al. (2024). Classification and antioxidant assays of polyphenols: a review. J. Future Foods 4, 193–204. doi: 10.1016/j.jfutfo.2023.07.002
Li, G., Huang, J., Jiang, H., Yang, X., Zhou, J., Dong, Q. (2024). Effects of different pollination modes on fruit setting rate of camellia reticulata lindl. J. Yunnan Agric. Univ. (Natural Science) 39, 120–124. doi: 10.12101/j.issn.1004-390X(n).202303018
Lievens, B., Hallsworth, J. E., Pozo, M. I., Belgacem, Z. B., Stevenson, A., Willems, K. A., et al. (2015). Microbiology of sugar-rich environments: diversity, ecology and system constraints. Environ. Microbiol. 17, 278–298. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12570
Liu, S., Chen, T., Ye, D., Chen, Q., Ni, J., Rao, M. (2023). Prediction of distributional patterns of four major Camellia oilseed species in China under climate and land use changes. Ecol. Indic. 155, 110996. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110996
Liu, C. H., Huang, H. Y. (2012). Antimicrobial activity of curcumin-loaded myristic acid microemulsions against Staphylococcus epidermidis. Chem. Pharm. Bull. (Tokyo) 60, 1118–1124. doi: 10.1248/cpb.c12-00220
Madan, A., Kumari, S., Kumar, S. (2024). “Floral Nectar Microbiome: An Untapped Aspect and Its Overall Impact on Plants in Changing Global Scenarios,” in Food Production, Diversity, and Safety Under Climate Change. Eds. Chakraborty, R., Mathur, P., Roy, S. (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham), 179–185. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-51647-4_15
Matiashe, I., Mahara, P., Marume, P. (2014). Development of Lemon and lime nectar at Mazoe Citrus Estate, Zimbabwe. IOSR J. Eng. (IOSRJEN) 04, 51–60. doi: 10.9790/3021-04145160
Meng, Q., Huang, R., Xun, L., Wu, X., Deng, S., Yue, D., et al. (2024). Endophytic bacteria in Camellia reticulata pedicels: isolation, screening and analysis of antagonistic activity against nectar yeasts. Front. Microbiol. 15. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1459354
Morris, M. M., Frixione, N. J., Burkert, A. C., Dinsdale, E. A., Vannette, R. L. (2020). Microbial abundance, composition, and function in nectar are shaped by flower visitor identity. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 96, fiaa003. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa003
Mueller, T. G., Francis, J. S., Vannette, R. L. (2023). Nectar compounds impact bacterial and fungal growth and shift community dynamics in a nectar analog. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 15, 170–180. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.13139
Nazemiyeh, H., Zengin, G., Mehrad, H., Farhoudi, M., Bahadori, M. B. (2020). LC-MS/MS-based steroidal saponins profiling and biological activities of Ruscus hyrcanus Woronow. Eur. J. Integr. Med. 40, 101245. doi: 10.1016/j.eujim.2020.101245
Nepi, M. (2017). New perspectives in nectar evolution and ecology: simple alimentary reward or a complex multiorganism interaction? Acta Agrobot. 70, 1704. doi: 10.5586/aa.1704
Nepi, M., Grasso, D. A., Mancuso, S. (2018). Nectar in plant–insect mutualistic relationships: from food reward to partner manipulation. Front. Plant Sci. 9. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01063
Nepi, M., Stpiczyńska, M. (2008). The complexity of nectar: secretion and resorption dynamically regulate nectar features. Naturwissenschaften 95, 177–184. doi: 10.1007/s00114-007-0307-2
Neto, G. C., Kono, Y., Hyakutake, H., Watanabe, M., Suzuki, Y., Sakurai, A. (1991). Isolation and identification of (–)-jasmonic acid from wild rice, oryza officinalis, as an antifungal substance. Agric. Biol. Chem. 55, 3097–3098. doi: 10.1080/00021369.1991.10857915
Nicolson, S. W. (2022). Sweet solutions: nectar chemistry and quality. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 377, 20210163. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0163
Ollerton, J., Winfree, R., Tarrant, S. (2011). How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos 120, 321–326. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18644.x
Osdaghi, E., Young, A. J., Harveson, R. M. (2020). Bacterial wilt of dry beans caused by Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens: A new threat from an old enemy. Mol. Plant Pathol. 21, 605–621. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12926
Osei, R., Yang, C., Cui, L., Ma, T., Li, Z., Boamah, S. (2022). Isolation, identification, and pathogenicity of Lelliottia amnigena causing soft rot of potato tuber in China. Microb. Pathogen. 164, 105441. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105441
Peay, K. G., Belisle, M., Fukami, T. (2012). Phylogenetic relatedness predicts priority effects in nectar yeast communities. Proc. Biol. Sci. 279, 749–758. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1230
Petanidou, T. (2005). Sugars in Mediterranean floral nectars: an ecological and evolutionary approach. J. Chem. Ecol. 31, 1065–1088. doi: 10.1007/s10886-005-4248-y
Pozo, M. I., de Vega, C., Canto, A., Herrera, C. M. (2009). Presence of yeasts in floral nectar is consistent with the hypothesis of microbial-mediated signaling in plant-pollinator interactions. Plant Signal Behav. 4, 1102–1104. doi: 10.4161/psb.4.11.9874
Qin, P., Shen, J., Wei, J., Chen, Y. (2024). A critical review of the bioactive ingredients and biological functions of camellia oleifera oil. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 8, 100753. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100753
Raguso, R. A. (2004). Why are some floral nectars scented? Ecology 85, 1486–1494. doi: 10.1890/03-0410
Rering, C. C., Beck, J. J., Hall, G. W., McCartney, M. M., Vannette, R. L. (2018). Nectar-inhabiting microorganisms influence nectar volatile composition and attractiveness to a generalist pollinator. New Phytol. 220, 750–759. doi: 10.1111/nph.14809
Roy, R., Schmitt, A. J., Thomas, J. B., Carter, C. J. (2017). Review: Nectar biology: From molecules to ecosystems. Plant Sci. 262, 148–164. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.04.012
Samuni-Blank, M., Izhaki, I., Laviad, S., Bar-Massada, A., Gerchman, Y., Halpern, M. (2014). The role of abiotic environmental conditions and herbivory in shaping bacterial community composition in floral nectar. PloS One 9, e99107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099107
Schmitt, A., Roy, R., Carter, C. J. (2021). Nectar antimicrobial compounds and their potential effects on pollinators. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 44, 55–63. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2021.03.004
Schmitt, A. J., Sathoff, A. E., Holl, C., Bauer, B., Samac, D. A., Carter, C. J. (2018). The major nectar protein of Brassica rapa is a non-specific lipid transfer protein, BrLTP2.1, with strong antifungal activity. J. Exp. Bot. 69, 5587–5597. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery319
Sharma, A., Biharee, A., Kumar, A., Jaitak, V. (2020). Antimicrobial terpenoids as a potential substitute in overcoming antimicrobial resistance. Curr. Drug Targets 21, 1476–1494. doi: 10.2174/1389450121666200520103427
Shen, N., Wang, T., Gan, Q., Liu, S., Wang, L., Jin, B. (2022). Plant flavonoids: Classification, distribution, biosynthesis, and antioxidant activity. Food Chem. 383, 132531. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132531
Shen, S., Zhan, C., Yang, C., Fernie, A. R., Luo, J. (2023). Metabolomics-centered mining of plant metabolic diversity and function: Past decade and future perspectives. Mol. Plant 16, 43–63. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2022.09.007
Stevenson, P. C., Nicolson, S. W., Wright, G. A. (2017). Plant secondary metabolites in nectar: impacts on pollinators and ecological functions. Funct. Ecol. 31, 65–75. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12761
Sudheeran, P. K., Ovadia, R., Galsarker, O., Maoz, I., Sela, N., Maurer, D., et al. (2020). Glycosylated flavonoids: fruit’s concealed antifungal arsenal. New Phytol. 225, 1788–1798. doi: 10.1111/nph.16251
Thompson, S. (2009). “Microbiological Spoilage of High-Sugar Products,” in Compendium of the Microbiological Spoilage of Foods and Beverages. Eds. Sperber, W. H., Doyle, M. P. (Springer New York, New York, NY), 301–324. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0826-1_11
Vannette, R. L. (2020). The floral microbiome: plant, pollinator, and microbial perspectives. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. System. 51, 363–386. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-011720-013401
Vannette, R. L., Gauthier, M. P., Fukami, T. (2013). Nectar bacteria, but not yeast, weaken a plant-pollinator mutualism. Proc. Biol. Sci. 280, 20122601. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2601
Wei, Z. M., Laby, R. J., Zumoff, C. H., Bauer, D. W., He, S. Y., Collmer, A., et al. (1992). Harpin, elicitor of the hypersensitive response produced by the plant pathogen Erwinia amylovora. Science 257, 85–88. doi: 10.1126/science.1621099
Wilson, M. I., Sigee, D. C., Epton, H. A. S. (1990). Erwinia amylovra infection of hawthorn blossom: III. The nectary. J. Phytopathol. 128, 62–74. doi: 10.1111/J.1439-0434.1990.TB04252.X
Wu, M., Brown, A. C. (2021). Applications of catechins in the treatment of bacterial infections. Pathogens 10, 546. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10050546
Xin, T., Huang, W., De Riek, J., Zhang, S., Ahmed, S., Van Huylenbroeck, J., et al. (2017). Genetic diversity, population structure, and traditional culture of Camellia reticulata. Ecol. Evol. 7, 8915–8926. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3340
Yan, J., Wang, G., Sui, Y., Wang, M., Zhang, L. (2016). Pollinator responses to floral colour change, nectar and scent promote reproductive fitness in Quisqualis indica (Combretaceae). Sci. Rep. 6, 24408. doi: 10.1038/srep24408
Zhang, F. P., Larson-Rabin, Z., Li, D. Z., Wang, H. (2012). Colored nectar as an honest signal in plant-animal interactions. Plant Signal Behav. 7, 811–812. doi: 10.4161/psb.20645
Keywords: Camellia reticulata, nectar, nectar microorganisms, nectar metabolites, antibacterial, homeostasis
Citation: Xun L, Huang R, Li Q, Meng Q, Su R, Wu X, Zhang R, Li L, Gong X and Dong K (2025) Specialized metabolites present in Camellia reticulata nectar inhibit the growth of nectar‐inhabiting microorganisms. Front. Plant Sci. 16:1557228. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1557228
Received: 08 January 2025; Accepted: 17 February 2025;
Published: 04 March 2025.
Edited by:
Mohamed Mannaa, Pusan National University, Republic of KoreaReviewed by:
Maria Jorge Campos, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, PortugalAdhityo Wicaksono, Bandung Institute of Technology, Indonesia
Shuna Jin, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, China
Copyright © 2025 Xun, Huang, Li, Meng, Su, Wu, Zhang, Li, Gong and Dong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kun Dong, ZG9uZ2t1bjE5NzIyMDA0QGFsaXl1bi5jb20=