94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
Agnès Ricroch1,2
Louie-David Desachy2
Mateo Penfornis2
Melekşen Akin3
Ankica Kondić-Špika4
Marcel Kuntz5
Dragana Miladinović4*- 1Laboratoire Institut Droit, Espaces et Technologies (IDEST), Faculté Jean Monnet, Université Paris-Saclay, Sceaux, France
- 2AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Palaiseau, France
- 3Department of Horticulture, Agricultural Faculty, Iğdır University, Iğdır, Türkiye
- 4Laboratory for Biotechnology, Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, National Institute of Republic of Serbia, Novi Sad, Serbia
- 5Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire et Végétale, Université Grenoble Alpes, Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS), Commissariat à l’énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA), Institut national de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement (INRAE), Grenoble, France
A Corrigendum on
Worldwide study on field trials of biotechnological crops: new promises but old policy hurdles
By Ricroch A, Desachy L-D, Penfornis M, Akin M, Kondić-Špika A, Kuntz M and Miladinović D (2024). Front. Plant Sci. 15:1452767. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1452767
In the published article, there was an error in Figure 4 as published. The sections A, B and C overlap and legends cannot be read. The corrected Figure 4 appears below.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Number of FTs using GenEd and Tr crops in the EU, Iceland, Switzerland and UK (2022-2023). (A) Listed by crops; (B) Listed by countries; (C) Listed by traits.
In the published article, there was an error in the Supplementary Material. Supplementary Tables S3, S4, S8, S12 and S15 were cut by page separation.
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: transgenesis, CRISPR, genome editing, plant breeding, field trials, biotechnology regulatory policy
Citation: Ricroch A, Desachy L-D, Penfornis M, Akin M, Kondić-Špika A, Kuntz M and Miladinović D (2024) Corrigendum: Worldwide study on field trials of biotechnological crops: new promises but old policy hurdles. Front. Plant Sci. 15:1531017. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1531017
Received: 19 November 2024; Accepted: 21 November 2024;
Published: 06 December 2024.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Min Chul Kim, Gyeongsang National University, Republic of KoreaCopyright © 2024 Ricroch, Desachy, Penfornis, Akin, Kondić-Špika, Kuntz and Miladinović. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Dragana Miladinović, ZHJhZ2FuYS5taWxhZGlub3ZpY0BpZnZjbnMubnMuYWMucnM=