Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Nutrition
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1517917
This article is part of the Research Topic Harnessing Plant–Microbe Interactions to Improve Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Plant-Soil Health for Sustainable Agriculture View all 6 articles

Straw return was more benefit to improving saline soil quality and crop productivity than biochar in the short term

Provisionally accepted
Ping Cong Ping Cong 1Jiashen Song Jiashen Song 1Jianxin Dong Jianxin Dong 2Wenyan Su Wenyan Su 2Wenhao Feng Wenhao Feng 1Hongyuan Zhang Hongyuan Zhang 1*
  • 1 Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 2 Tobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agriculural Sciences, Qingdao, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Salinized soil often exhibits high salt content and low nutrient availability, leading to the reduction of soil ecosystem function and crop productivity. Although straw return has profound effects on saline soil improvement, how soil quality index (SQI), soil ecosystem multi-functionality (EMF), and crop yield respond to different organic ameliorants remain unclear. Herein, a field experiment was established to explore the influence of various straw managements (no organic ameliorant, CK; corn straw return, CS; corn straw biochar return; CB) on the saline soil functions and crop productivity. In relative to CK and CB, CS significantly improved SQI by 52 and 35%, respectively. This may be due to the decreased soil salt (especially soluble Na+) and increased available nutrient under corn straw return. Furthermore, CS increased soil EMF than CK by 71% and CB by 39%, which was caused by the increased activities of β-1, 4-glucosidase, β-1,4-N-Acetyl-glucosaminidase, and Leucine aminopeptidase. Linear model further supported that soil enzyme activities are positively related to available nutrient contents and negatively correlated with salt content. Moreover, the crop yield under CS significantly increased by 22% compared to CK. Also, soil quality positively influenced crop yield, with soil salt and available phosphorus were the primary influencing factors. However, crop yield was not sensitive to soil EMF. In summary, straw return was more benefit to improving soil quality and crop productivity than biochar in the short term in saline soils.

    Keywords: saline soil, soil quality index, crop yield, Ecosystem multi-functionality, Straw return, biochar

    Received: 27 Oct 2024; Accepted: 12 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Cong, Song, Dong, Su, Feng and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Hongyuan Zhang, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.