Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Nutrition
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1513724

Corrigendum: Root symbiotic fungi improve nitrogen transfer and morpho-physiological performance in Chenopodium quinoa

Provisionally accepted
Shirley Lorena Alquichire-Rojas Shirley Lorena Alquichire-Rojas 1Elizabeth Escobar Elizabeth Escobar 2*Luisa Bascunán-Godoy Luisa Bascunán-Godoy 2*Marcia González-Teuber Marcia González-Teuber 3*
  • 1 Catholic University of the Most Holy Conception, Concepción, Chile
  • 2 University of Concepcion, Concepción, VIII Biobío Region, Chile
  • 3 Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan Region (RM), Chile

This article is a correction to:

  1. Root symbiotic fungi improve nitrogen transfer and morpho-physiological performance in Chenopodium quinoa

    1. Read original article

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    In the published article, there was an error in the legend for [Figure 4B] as published, [there was an error in the unit used for stomatal conductance: we wrote "gs (nmol H2O m -2 s -1 )" where we meant gs (mmol H2O m -2 s -1 )].The corrected legend appears below.[(B) gs (mmol H2O m -2 s -1 )]The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated. In the published article, there was an error in [Figure 4] as published, [there was an error in the unit used for stomatal conductance: we wrote gs (nmol H2O m -2 s -1 ) where we meant gs (mmol H2O m -2 s -1 )]. The corrected [Figure 4] and its caption appear below. quinoa (A) net photosynthetic rate (μmol CO2 m -2 s -1 ) (n = 4-6), (B) stomatal conductance rate (mmol H2O m -2 s -1 ) (n = 4-6), and (C) transpiration (mmol H2O m -2 s -1 ) (n = 4-6). Error bar labels with different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) among treatments. 5 mM, low nitrogen level; 15 mM, high nitrogen level; EIPF-, non-inoculated plants; EIPF1+, inoculated with Beauveria; EIPF2+, inoculated with Metarhizium.The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated. In the published article, there was an error in [Table 1] as published. [there was an error in the unit used for stomatal conductance: we wrote gs (nmol H2O m -2 s -1 ) where we meant gs (mmol H2O m - 2 s -1 )]. The corrected [Table 1] and its caption **[Table 1: Two-way ANOVA of the effects of nitrogen (N) level and EIPF inoculation on physiological and morphological traits in Chenopodium quinoa.] appear below. In the published article, there was an error, [in the reagent's name used for Glutamine Synthetase assay: we wrote "hydroxyamide" where we meant "hydroxylamine".].

    Keywords: entomopathogenic fungi, Nitrogen transfer, Photosynthesis, carbon allocation, Plant Growth, Symbiosis, Quinoa

    Received: 19 Oct 2024; Accepted: 11 Nov 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Alquichire-Rojas, Escobar, Bascunán-Godoy and González-Teuber. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Elizabeth Escobar, University of Concepcion, Concepción, 3580000, VIII Biobío Region, Chile
    Luisa Bascunán-Godoy, University of Concepcion, Concepción, 3580000, VIII Biobío Region, Chile
    Marcia González-Teuber, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, 3580000, Santiago Metropolitan Region (RM), Chile

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.