Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Plant Sci., 25 July 2024
Sec. Plant Symbiotic Interactions
This article is part of the Research Topic Genome and Metagenome Interactions in the Plant Holobiont for Plant Health and Productivity View all 9 articles

Editorial: Genome and metagenome interactions in the plant holobiont for plant health and productivity

  • 1Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
  • 2School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom

Plants engage with a diverse array of microorganisms, collectively referred to as the plant microbiota. These interactions significantly impact plant health and survival: while some may lead to plant diseases, others can promote growth and resilience (Yu et al., 2019). In agriculture, understanding the mechanisms governing plant-microbe interactions is key to their translation into sustainable agronomic strategies such as biocontrol, biostimulation, biofertilization (Arif et al., 2020), and more recently also in plant breeding for the microbiota interactions (Escudero-Martinez and Bulgarelli, 2019, 2023). Whereas in natural ecosystems, plant-microbe interactions are fundamental to ecosystem functioning by facilitating nutrient cycling, soil health, plant survival, and overall biodiversity (Parasuraman et al., 2019). Hence, plant-microbiota research is key to developing strategies for sustainable agricultural production, food security, and environmental conservation.

Our research aims to contribute to the knowledge in this field (Passera et al., 2020, 2021; Escudero-Martinez et al., 2022; Escudero Martinez, 2023), thus we were determined to open the present Research Topic in Frontiers in Plant Science intending to compile a collection reflecting on the field status. This Research Topic has advanced and consolidated knowledge on how plants actively recruit specific microorganisms from the soil microbiota, influenced by factors such as soil characteristics, plant species, developmental stage, environmental conditions, and agricultural practices. We have attempted likewise to present recent multidisciplinary advances in genomics, metagenomics, metabolomics, and microbiota analyses in 8 insightful manuscripts compiling the research of 69 authors from all around the World.

The plant-associated microbiota is key to the adaptation of wild plants to their natural environments. The study by Liu et al. compared different Camellia species growing either in acidic or karst soils, identifying microorganisms (e.g., Candidatus Rokubacteria) specifically enriched in the rhizosphere of Camellia growing in karst soils. These microorganisms might help the plant obtain more nutrients, thus strengthening their secondary metabolism and mitigating the stress associated with adverse karst environments.

The manuscript by Csorba et al. examines how in natural ecosystems the soil type, developmental stage, and geographical location influence the root microbiota and metabolome of the wild medicinal plant Echium vulgare. All these variables affected the root metabolome, with sugars and pyrrolizidine alkaloids more abundant at the rosette stage, and echimidine showing location-dependent variations. Microbial diversity varied predominantly by location and soil pH, with acidophilic bacteria being prevalent in acidic soils. Overall, this research illustrates the dynamism and complexities of the multiple interactions of the microbiota with their hosts.

In agricultural environments, agronomic strategies such as tillage, fertilisation, and irrigation have implications for the crop’s microbiota (Romano et al.) This research piece assesses the above-mentioned agronomic practises on winter wheat yield, nitrogen uptake, microbial activity, and rhizosphere-root microbial communities. Wheat yield and nitrogen uptake responded to irrigation, fertilization, and genotype, while microbial activity varied with irrigation and tillage. This research informs sustainable agricultural practices by linking them to microbial community dynamics.

Another important agronomic strategy linked to the microbiota is the application of microbes as biofertilizers (Bhardwaj et al., 2014). Li et al. investigated the mechanism by which a bacterial strain increased cash crop growth. The authors showed an increase in soil fast-acting nitrogen and phosphorus, suggesting an enhanced microbial nutrient turnover. This was confirmed by nitrogen cycling genes favouring ammonium oxidation. Metagenome analysis revealed microbial genomes putatively involved in plant growth promotion traits. These findings underline the biofertilizers’ potential to optimize nutrient availability for plants.

An additional use for plant’s beneficial microbes is the prevention or mitigation of environmental stresses. Senizza et al. investigated changes in the microbiota and metabolic profile of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana treated with Trichoderma spp. and challenged with heat and drought stresses. In this study treatment with Trichoderma triggers a restructuring of microbial communities and plant’s metabolic profiles. By the integration of multi-omics analyses, the study identified a plant growth response that is mediated by the entire plant holobiont, even under stress conditions.

Another research in A. thaliana microbiota investigates the mechanistic relationship between genotype and leaf microbiota. In this study by Li et al., network mapping was used to dissect the leaf-microbiota interactions finding interactions that are consistent with different ecological theories, including the golden threshold and surrender-resistance hypotheses. This study reveals the “endophenotype” of microbial networks linking plant genotype and phenotype.

The plant immune system shapes plant-microbiota interactions (Trivedi et al., 2020). Oldstone-Jackson et al. investigated the impact on the microbiota of transmembrane pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) mutants in A. thaliana roots. PRRs are important components of the plant immune system implicated in triggering the plant defence cascade upon recognition of microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs). The authors found a limited impact of these mutants on root endophytic bacterial and fungal microbiota composition under field conditions. Suggesting that, at least under field conditions, the challenge of balancing pathogen recognition with the recruitment of beneficial microbiota in roots requires further investigation.

Lastly, Wang et al. investigated the post-harvest soil microbiota of different bean species (legumes) used for intercropping in tea plantations. While the use of intercropping generally enhanced the quantity of nutrients found in the soil, the different legume species recruited unique microbial communities with the adzuki bean being associated with a lower pH and the presence of weeds.

Overall, the Research Topic highlights the importance of the interactions between plants and their microbiota in both natural and agricultural environments. Factors like soil characteristics, plant species, genetics, developmental stages, and agricultural practices, shape these communities. It is therefore important to take a step forward and resolve the significance of this microbial temporal and spatial dynamics. Would functions rather than taxonomies provide more consistent insights across environments? Which microbes are actively recruited by host plants during stress responses? Upon stress, do microbes confer beneficial functions, or are opportunistic microbes also present, and if so, what dictates the plant response outcome? Can stresses enhance positive plant-microbe symbiosis in the form of beneficial plant feedback? Ultimately, this Research Topic aimed to enlighten the interactions that influence plant health, resilience, and productivity, offering promising avenues for sustainable and equitable agriculture.

Author contributions

AP: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. CE-M: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Arif, I., Batool, M., Schenk, P. M. (2020). Plant microbiome engineering: expected benefits for improved crop growth and resilience. Trends Biotechnol. 38, 1385–1396. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.04.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bhardwaj, D., Ansari, M. W., Sahoo, R. K., Tuteja, N. (2014). Biofertilizers function as key player in sustainable agriculture by improving soil fertility, plant tolerance and crop productivity. Microb. Cell Fact 13, 66. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-13-66

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Escudero Martinez, C. M. (2023). Plant–microbe interactions: Mining heritable root-associated microbiota across environments. Curr. Biol. 33, R413–R415. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.03.068

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Escudero-Martinez, C., Bulgarelli, D. (2019). Tracing the evolutionary routes of plant–microbiota interactions. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 49, 34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2019.09.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Escudero-Martinez, C., Bulgarelli, D. (2023). Engineering the crop microbiota through host genetics. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 61, 257–277. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-021621-121447

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Escudero-Martinez, C., Coulter, M., Alegria Terrazas, R., Foito, A., Kapadia, R., Pietrangelo, L., et al. (2022). Identifying plant genes shaping microbiota composition in the barley rhizosphere. Nat. Commun. 13, 1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31022-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Parasuraman, P., Pattnaik, S., Busi, S. (2019). Plant-microbe interactions in ecosystems functioning and sustainability. New Future Developments Microbial Biotechnol. Bioengineering: Microbial Biotechnol. Agro-environmental Sustainability, 255–266. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64191-5.00018-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Passera, A., Follador, A., Morandi, S., Miotti, N., Ghidoli, M., Venturini, G., et al. (2021). Bacterial communities in the embryo of maize landraces: relation with susceptibility to fusarium ear rot. Microorganisms 9, 2388. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9112388

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Passera, A., Vacchini, V., Cocetta, G., Shahzad, G. I. R., Arpanahi, A. A., Casati, P., et al. (2020). Towards Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture: An evaluation of biocontrol effects, nutritional value, and ecological impact of bacterial inoculants. Sci. Total Environ. 724. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138127

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trivedi, P., Leach, J. E., Tringe, S. G., Sa, T., Singh, B. K. (2020). Plant–microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 607–621. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0412-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, K., Pieterse, C. M. J., Bakker, P. A. H. M., Berendsen, R. L. (2019). Beneficial microbes going underground of root immunity. Plant Cell Environ. 42, 2860–2870. doi: 10.1111/pce.13632

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: plant-associated microbiome, multi-omic analyses, plant-microbe interaction, rhizosphere microbiome, sustainable agriculture

Citation: Passera A and Escudero-Martinez C (2024) Editorial: Genome and metagenome interactions in the plant holobiont for plant health and productivity. Front. Plant Sci. 15:1463795. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1463795

Received: 12 July 2024; Accepted: 18 July 2024;
Published: 25 July 2024.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Andrea Genre, University of Turin, Italy

Copyright © 2024 Passera and Escudero-Martinez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Alessandro Passera, YWxlc3NhbmRyby5wYXNzZXJhQHVuaW1pLml0; Carmen Escudero-Martinez, Yy5tLnouZXNjdWRlcm9tYXJ0aW5lekBkdW5kZWUuYWMudWs=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.