- 1Heilongjiang Province Key Laboratory of Geographical Environment Monitoring and Spatial Information Service in Cold Regions, Harbin Normal University, Harbin, China
- 2Heilongjiang Province Collaborative Innovation Center of Cold Region Ecological Safety, Harbin, China
- 3Cryosphere Research Station on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Science, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China
Global warming has caused the gradual degradation of permafrost, which may affect the vegetation water uptake from different depths. However, the water utilization strategies of different vegetation species during the thawing stages of permafrost regions need further study. To elucidate these differences, we selected the permafrost region in Northeast China as study area. We analyzed the water uptake from different depths of Larix gmelinii, a deciduous coniferous tree, Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica, an evergreen tree, and Betula platyphylla, a deciduous broadleaf tree, using stable isotopes of xylem water, soil water, and precipitation from June to October 2019. The results showed that L. gmelinii primarily used shallow soil water (0-40 cm) with the highest proportion at 64.1%, B. platyphylla generally used middle soil water (40-110 cm) with the highest proportion at 55.7%, and P. sylvestris mainly used middle (40-110cm) and deep soil water (110-150 cm) with the highest proportion at 40.4% and 56.9%. The water sources from different depths exhibited more frequent changes in P. sylvestris, indicating a higher water uptake capacity from different soil depths. L. gmelinii mainly uptakes water from shallow soils, suggesting that the water uptake of this species is sensitive to permafrost degradation. This study revealed the water uptake strategies from different depths of three tree species in a permafrost region, and the results suggested that water uptake capacity of different tree species should be considered in the prediction of vegetation changes in permafrost regions under a warming climate.
1 Introduction
Forests pivotal in regulating global energy flows, hydrology, and carbon cycle have their distribution, biomass, and abundance are predominantly governed by temperature and water resources (Dodd et al., 1998; Drake and Franks, 2003; Tao et al., 2016). Water use strategy is an important mechanism used by plants to adapt to the environment and is a key controlling factor for the species distribution (Wang et al., 2017). The capacity of plants to uptake water from rainfall, soil water, runoff water, and groundwater is largely determined by the distribution of their roots (Sun et al., 2011). Generally, Herbaceous plants predominantly utilize water from shallow soil layers (Asbjornsen et al., 2008; Priyadarshini et al., 2016), while shrubs and trees are able to utilize deep soil water sources (Mccole and Stern, 2007; Wu et al., 2016). The differences in water use strategies may be a mechanism for the coexistence of various vegetation species (Wu et al., 2016).
Global warming has led to the gradual degradation of permafrost, e.g., increase soil temperature and the active layer thickness (Cheng and Wu, 2007; Biskaborn et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2023). The interactions between permafrost and vegetation are very complicated. Vegetation can affect the underlying permafrost hydrothermal conditions via the mulching effect, soil heat convection, evapotranspiration, and water retention capacities on the one hand (Tchebakova et al., 2009), permafrost changes can also impact the vegetation growth in the permafrost regions via the regulation of soil water, temperature, and nutrients supply on the other (Dong et al., 2021). Among these mechanisms, plant roots are crucial for the uptake of water and nutrients. In permafrost regions, the majority of the vegetation roots are distributed in the active layer (Blume-Werry et al., 2019). In areas where permafrost has been degraded, deep roots can also invade newly thawed permafrost located underneath, and these changes will inevitably affect the water uptake capacity of plants (Blume-Werry et al., 2019).
In cold regions, plant water uptake from different depths exhibits a seasonal variation due to the freeze-thaw cycle of soils. In early spring, surface soils begin to thaw, making liquid water available for plant growth. During the summer, soil water in the thawed active layer can be utilized for plant growth (Sugimoto et al., 2002). Soil water derived from rainfall infiltration typically constitutes the principal resource for plant growth (Asbjornsen et al., 2008); however, water released from thawing permafrost becomes a critical source when losses due to soil evapotranspiration surpass precipitation (Churakova-Sidorova et al., 2020). During the freezing period, soil freezes rapidly and the liquid water content is low (Dong et al., 2021). At this stage, the majority of the vegetation remains dormant and the water utilization rate is low (Tiemuerbieke et al., 2018). The period of vegetation growth predominantly occurs during the thawing phase of perennial permafrost. Thus, it is imperative to examine vegetation water use strategies within this critical phase.
Multiple methods are available to assess the water use status of vegetation, such as root system excavation (Swaffer et al., 2014), radioactive tracer tritium (Schwendenmann et al., 2015). However, these methods tend to be time-consuming, costly, and even radioactive. Scholars have recently proposed the use of oxygen isotopes to identify water resources (Ding et al., 2021; Ma et al., 2021; Sun et al., 2024),as isotopic fractionation does not occur before water absorbed by plant roots is transported to the leaves through the xylem. The quantification of plant water sources can be achieved by analyzing hydrogen and oxygen isotope ratios in xylem water and potential sources, employing the MixSIAR model (Huo et al., 2018; Ma et al., 2021).
From the 1950s to the 2010s, the degradation of permafrost in northeastern China has become more pronounced, leading to a decrease in the total area from 4.8 × 105 km² to 3.1 × 105 km² (Zhang et al., 2021). The Greater Khingan Mountains in Northeast China is the largest area of virgin natural forests, which is sensitive to climate change due to the fragility of the permafrost environment. A diverse array of vegetation thrives, with the majority of root systems concentrated within the active layer (Blume-Werry et al., 2019). The continuing degradation of permafrost may affect plant water uptake as it can induce a deeper active layer and longer thaw period (Oliva and Fritz, 2018; Li et al., 2022). These changes may further influence plant survival and vegetation succession, given that water utilization is a critical determinant of plant growth (Wang et al., 2017). However, most of the current research on vegetation water sourcing focuses on arid, semi-arid, and watershed regions, leaving a significant knowledge gap regarding the water absorption strategies among different vegetation types during the thawing stages of permafrost regions. These knowledge gaps thus limit our insights into the future dynamics of plant species in permafrost regions under a warming climate.
In this study, we focused on the permafrost region of the Greater Khingan Mountains in Northeast China, investigating the water sources and utilization strategies of three tree species, namely Larix gmelinii (deciduous coniferous tree), Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica (evergreen tree) and Betula platyphylla (deciduous broadleaf tree). We analyzed the stable hydrogen and oxygen isotopic compositions of xylem water, soil water and precipitation during June-October 2019. The results can provide insights into the effects of permafrost degradation on vegetation growth and provide some scientific reference for the prediction of vegetation changes with future climate in the permafrost regions.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Study area
The study area is located in close proximity within Beiji Village, Mohe City, Heilongjiang Province, in the northern Greater Khingan Mountains (52°10′-53°33′N, 121°07′-124°20′E) (Figure 1) and belongs to mountainous permafrost regions. The region is characterized by an average elevation ranging from 300 to 500 meters and experiences a cold-temperate continental monsoon climate. The tree species mainly include Larix gmelinii, Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica, Betula platyphylla, etc. Shrub species include Vaccinium uliginosum, Rhododendron dauricum, Ledum palustre, etc., and the dominant herbs are Pyrola incarnata, Eriophorum vaginatum, etc.
Figure 1. Study area in the Mohe, Heilongjiang Province (Lg is the sampling site for Larix gmelinii, Pm is the sampling site for Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica, Bp is the sampling site for Betula platyphylla, BJ01 is the sampling site for soil water content, air temperature and humidity, water vapor pressure, and ground temperature).
Sample trees were selected according to mean average diameter at breast height (DBH, 1.3 m) and height (H). The average DBH of L. gmelinii, P. sylvestris and B. platyphylla were 18.4 cm, 25.1 cm and 16.8 cm, with heights of 16.5 m, 20.3 m and 15.1 m. Three replicates were taken from each tree for the measurement of stable hydrogen and oxygen isotopes.
2.2 Sample collection
Monthly sampling might reflect changes in vegetation water use strategies (Asbjornsen et al., 2008). However, since the active layer of permafrost remained predominantly thawed from June to October, with significant soil water variation across periods, we opted for semi-monthly sampling to more effectively capture changes in plant water uptake strategies. In 2019, Vegetation xylem, soil, and precipitation samples of L. gmelinii, P. sylvestris and B. platyphylla were collected on June 8, June 20, July 7, July 26, August 7, August 26, September 10, September 26, and October 6 (total of nine sampling dates). To mitigate the effects of light, temperature and other environmental variables on isotope fractions, sampling was conducted from 08:00 to 10:00 local time. Samples were preserved at low temperatures in an insulated box with ice and promptly transported to the laboratory for analysis.
The branches of L. gmelinii, P. sylvestris and B. platyphylla (from the east, west, north, and south) were harvested using high branch shears to a length of approximately 5-8 cm. The tree bark and phloem of the branches were quickly peeled off and placed into a 10 mL glass vial. The cap was securely tightened and the vial was sealed using a sealing film. The total number of vegetation xylem samples collected was 81. Soil samples were extracted using a gasoline-powered auger at 10 cm intervals from the surface down to 150 cm depth. These samples were utilized to analyze the hydrogen and oxygen isotopic compositions in soil water. Overall, 405 soil samples were collected. In each sampling area, precipitation collectors were installed, featuring a 200 mm diameter funnel with a Ping pong ball to inhibit evaporation. Collected precipitation was stored in 500 ml bottles (Wang et al., 2010). Then, Samples were decanted into 50 ml airtight polyethylene vials, subsequently filtered through a 0.22 μm membrane, transferred to 2 ml screw-top vials, sealed with Parafilm, and stored at 4°C in a frozen state for hydrogen and oxygen isotope analysis. In total, 24 precipitation samples were collected.
2.3 Isotope measurement
Water was extracted from vegetation xylem and soil samples using an automated vacuum condensation extraction system (LI-2100). Subsequently, the extracted water and precipitation samples were subjected to hydrogen and oxygen isotope measurements using an isotope mass spectrometer MAT253. The δ18O and δD are expressed as permillage relative to Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water (V-SMOW):
where RSample is the ratio of the heavy isotopes to light isotopes in water samples; and δ18O and δD are 18O/16O and 2H/1H, respectively.
2.4 Soil and meteorological data
The data used in this study include soil water content (θ), air temperature and humidity, water vapor pressure (WVP), and ground temperature (Ts). The unfrozen water content, denoted as θ, was determined using a Hydra soil moisture sensor, achieving an accuracy of ±3%. Ts was measured using a 105T thermocouple probe, which offers a precision of 0.1°C. The probe was installed at 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, 130, 150 cm in vertical profile. The air temperature and humidity were recorded using the HC2-S3 air temperature and humidity sensor. These sensors were interfaced with a CR1000 data logger, capturing data at 30-minute intervals.
2.5 Direct comparisons method and MixSIAR model
We conducted a qualitative analysis of the water sources for the three vegetation species using the direct comparison method. Oxygen isotopes from the potential water sources were compared with those from the vegetation xylem, with the overlap or proximity between the two considered indicative of the primary water source for the vegetation-the closer the match, the greater the proportion of water absorbed and utilized by the vegetation (Laur and Hacke, 2014; Yang et al., 2015). However, this method only provides a preliminary identification of the primary absorption layer and does not quantify the contributions of each potential water source to the vegetation’s water uptake.
The two-end-member mixing model and MixSIAR model can quantify the proportional contribution of each potential water source to vegetation water uptake (Rossatto et al., 2014; Song et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017). The former generally requires only two potential water sources, while the MixSIAR model can accommodate three or more. Additionally, MixSIAR enhances the performance of fixed and random effects, processes errors and residuals, and integrates sources of uncertainty (Stock et al., 2018). In our study, due to the involvement of multiple potential water sources, we employed the MixSIAR model to quantify the contributions of each to vegetation water uptake. We used the average δD and δ18O values of xylem water from the three vegetation species across different periods, along with the average δD and δ18O values of each potential water source, and fractionation data (defaulted to 0, assuming no fractionation) as model inputs. The runtime for Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) was set to ‘normal’ (chain length = 100,000; burn = 50,000; thin = 50; chains = 3), “Process only” was used for the error selection. Before output, model convergence was confirmed using Gelman-Rubin and Geweke diagnostics. To reduce errors in the analysis process, the water sources were divided into three potential depths (Huo et al., 2018):
1. in the shallow soil water layer (0-40 cm), the δ18O values are unstable and most enriched.
2. in the middle soil water layer (40-110 cm), the δ18O values exhibit limited relative variation.
3. in the deep soil water layer (110-150 cm), the δ18O values are relatively uniform and relatively depleted.
2.6 Data analyses
We conducted ordinary least squares (OLS) regression between δD and δ18O values from precipitation, xylem water of different tree species, and soil water to derive the local meteoric water line, xylem water lines, and the soil water line in the study area. A one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test (p< 0.05), was employed to assess differences in δD and δ18O values among the xylem water of different tree species. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19 (IBM), and all graphs were generated with Origin 2018 (OriginLab).
3 Results
3.1 Climate conditions
The annual temperature in the study area in 2019 ranged from -39.59 to 32.72°C, with a mean annual air temperature of -2.35°C. The total precipitation was 369.4 mm, with monthly averages of 42.4, 116.6, 32.1, 55.6, and 39.5 mm from June to October, respectively. The overall trends in variation of precipitation, air temperature and water vapor pressure over time were similar, initially increasing and subsequently decreasing. The relative humidity showed an overall trend of initially decreasing, then increasing, and subsequently decreasing. All four indicators reached their maximum values in July (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Variation of precipitation (mm), air temperature (°C), relative humidity (%) and water vapor pressure (kPa) in the study area during 2019.
3.2 Soil temperature and soil water content
From June to October, the soil temperature exhibited an initial increase followed by a subsequent decrease. Furthermore, the soil temperature gradually decreased with depth (Figure 3). Moderate changes were observed in the soil temperature isotherms from June 8 to August 26, while changes were more abrupt from September 10 to October 6. This indicates that the soil warming rate was much slower than the soil cooling rate.
From June 8 to August 7, the gradual increase in soil temperature and the downward progression of the melting front within the active layer of permafrost coincided with an incremental rise in soil water content at increasing depths. This resulted in substantial variations in the soil water content with a maximum fluctuation of 34.84% (Figure 3). Soil temperatures remained above 0°C, marking the cessation of thawing in the active layer of permafrost (Dong et al., 2021). The thawing of the active layer largely concluded between August 26 and October 6, the soil water content was approximately 32% in the surface layer and about 43% in the middle and deep layers (Figure 3). After mid-October, the active layer of permafrost gradually transitioned into a freezing state.
3.3 Precipitation, soil water and xylem water isotopes
The δD values of precipitation samples varied from -183.55‰ to -60.77‰, averaging -106.01‰. Similarly, δ18O values spanned from -21.59‰ to -8.56‰, averaging -13.27‰. Overall, there was significant fluctuation and poor stability. The slope of the local atmospheric precipitation line (LMWL: δD=8.73δ18O+9.85, R2=0.96, p<0.001) exceed that of the global atmospheric precipitation line (GMWL: δD=8δ18O+10) (Figure 4), indicating greater isotopic fractionation and higher air humidity during the precipitation process (Xia et al., 2019).
Figure 4. Distribution of xylem water, soil water and precipitation, δD and δ18O values for different tree species and corresponding linear regressions (GMWL – δD=8δ18O+10; LMWL – δD=8.73δ18O+9.85, R2=0.96, p<0.001; PWL – plant xylem water; SWL – soil water).
Among the three vegetation species, the plant water line for L. gmelinii displayed the highest slope, while B. platyphylla exhibited the lowest (Figure 4). Compared to precipitation, the δD and δ18O values in the xylem water of the three vegetation species showed less variation and were closely aligned with the isotopic composition of their respective soil waters (Figure 4). The highest xylem water δD values were recorded in B. platyphylla, while the lowest were observed in P. sylvestris. Correspondingly, the highest δ18O values were measured in B. platyphylla, followed by P. sylvestris and L. gmelinii (Figure 5). There were no significant differences in xylem δD among the three tree species (p > 0.05). Additionally, the δ18O values of xylem water in the three vegetation species demonstrated similar patterns and maintained consistent trends on July 26, August 7, and August 26. However, during other periods, the magnitude of fluctuations varied.
The slope and intercept of the soil water lines of all three vegetation species were lower than those of the local atmospheric precipitation line, with B. platyphylla being the highest and P. sylvestris the lowest. P. sylvestris exhibited the highest average soil water δD and δ18O values, while the lowest average values were recorded in L. gmelinii. During the same period, the three vegetation species showed distinct differences in soil water δ18O values (Figure 6). The δ18O values within the soil profile showed enrichment in the shallow layer and decreased progressively with depth.
3.4 Water sources of three vegetation species
The vegetation water sources were analyzed based on direct comparisons. At points where the δ18O values of xylem water and soil water intersected, and their proximity was notable, these intersections were considered indicative of the primary water sources for vegetation (Laur and Hacke, 2014; Yang et al., 2015). Conversely, if no intersection occurred between the δ18O values of vegetation xylem water and soil water (e.g., absence of intersection for L. gmelinii on August 7), the primary water sources could not be conclusively identified (Figure 6). The L. gmelinii xylem water δ18O exhibited several intersections with soil shallow water (0-40 cm), while complex changes were observed for P. sylvestris. The xylem of B. platyphylla exhibited more intersections with the soil middle water layer (40-110 cm) compared to the other layers.
The results from the MixSIAR model and the direct comparisons essentially yielded the same conclusions for the main water absorption layer of vegetation (Figure 7). L. gmelinii primarily used shallow soil water (maximum contribution of 64.1%), P. sylvestris mainly used middle (maximum contribution of 40.4%) and deep (maximum contribution of 56.9%) soil water, and B. platyphylla generally relied on middle soil water (maximum contribution of 55.7%). Furthermore, P. sylvestris utilized deep soil water mainly on June 20, August 26 and September 26, with contributions of 43.6%, 56.9% and 44.6%, while the greatest utilization of deep soil water by B. platyphylla was observed on June 8 and August 7, with contributions of 36.8% and 49.4%. The results indicate that P. sylvestris has the greatest capacity to utilize deep soil water, followed by B. platyphylla, while L. gmelinii relies less on deep soil water.
4 Discussion
4.1 Soil water dynamics
From June to October, soil water content exhibited significant fluctuations, reaching up to 41%, in response to variations in soil temperature. From June 8 to August 7, soil water content progressively increased with depth (Figure 3). However, between June 8 and July 26, the soil water content at 100-120 cm was at its lowest. This phenomenon is mainly attributed to the soil’s limited water-holding capacity. Specifically, liquid water produced by the top-down thawing of the active layer, combined with precipitation, forms surface water that migrates downward to the soil layer near the upper limit of the permafrost due to gravitational forces (Romanovsky et al., 2010). Therefore, the soil water content at 100-120 cm was lower than that in both the overlying and underlying layers.
The relatively high soil water content at 0-20 cm on July 26 was primarily caused by the continuous rainfall prior to this date, which infiltrated into the shallow layer of the soil and migrated downward by gravity (Hinkel et al., 2001). Rainfall has been demonstrated to strongly affect soil (0-80 cm) water (Xu et al., 2011). The water content was high and relatively stable from September 10 to October 6. The active layer entered the freezing period from October 6 to October 31, resulting in a decrease in unfrozen soil water content. The active layer freezes in both directions and freezing occurs much faster than the thawing process (Dong et al., 2021).
4.2 Hydrogen and oxygen isotopic variability in diverse water bodies
The δD and δ18O values of the precipitation samples exhibited significant fluctuations and low stability. This conclusion is consistent with findings from numerous studies (Song et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017). Song et al. (2016) observed variations in the water sources for P. sylvestris, noting significant fluctuations in the hydrogen and oxygen isotopes of precipitation (-3.6‰ to -17.0‰ for δ18O and -126.5‰ to -33.4‰ for δD) throughout the observation period. Wang et al. (2017) reported significant fluctuations in the hydrogen and oxygen isotopes of precipitation between sampling dates while studying seasonal changes in water absorption by three vegetation species. Variations in δD and δ18O in precipitation across different regions are likely associated with discrepancies in precipitation sources and meteorological conditions during different time periods (Hao and Li, 2021).
Compared to precipitation, variations in δD and δ18O values in vegetation xylem water exhibited markedly less variability. The isotopic composition of xylem water reflects the integration of multiple water sources, with seasonal fluctuations in these isotopic signatures indicating variations in water source utilization by vegetation across various growth periods (Laur and Hacke, 2014). In this study, the highest and lowest water δD values in the xylem were observed in B. platyphylla and P. sylvestris, respectively. B. platyphylla exhibited the highest δ18O values, followed by P. sylvestris and L. gmelinii. The disparities in hydrogen and oxygen isotope compositions across various vegetation species predominantly reflect the inherent traits of the vegetation (Hao and Li, 2021). Additionally, the δD and δ18O values in xylem water were very close to those in soil water (Wang et al., 2010), indicating that L. gmelinii, P. sylvestris, and B. platyphylla primarily obtained water from the soil during their growth.
During the same period, the three vegetation species exhibited distinct δ18O isotopic variations in soil water. Hao and Li (2021) suggested that the disparities in δD and δ18O values of soil water among various vegetation types might stem from differences in soil texture, structure, vegetation types, and the extent of community coverage. In the soil profiles of the three vegetation species, δ18O values were enriched in the upper layers and declined progressively with depth. This was mainly because the process of dynamic fractionation was more intense in the shallow soil layers, where lighter water molecules (1H216O) evaporated first, enriching the δ18O values of shallow soil water. In contrast, the deep soil water was less influenced by environmental factors and exhibited weaker evaporation effects (Sprenger et al., 2016). The δD and δ18O values of soil water closely approximated the local atmospheric precipitation line, indicating substantial replenishment of soil water from rainfall (Wang et al., 2017; Huo et al., 2018). This study reveals that precipitation predominantly replenishes shallow soil water, with less impact on the middle and deep layers. The positioning of δD and δ18O values of soil water in the middle and deep layers above and to the left of the local precipitation line suggests that the water in these layers, which supports vegetation growth, primarily originates from the melting of the active permafrost layer.
4.3 Vegetation water sources
From June to October, L. gmelinii obtained roughly 71.9% of its water from the 0-110 cm soil layer, yet demonstrated a stronger dependence on the more superficial 0-40 cm layer. Similar results were found in other permafrost studies. For example, in the permafrost regions of Siberia, research indicated that 80% of the fine roots of L. gmelinii were located within the upper 30 cm of the soil profile. Notably, roots found between 30 and 70 cm depths were predominantly responsible for water uptake (Sugimoto et al., 2002). However, Churakova-Sidorova et al. (2020) showed that L. gmelinii does not obtain water beyond 50 cm of the soil. The observed variations in results may be attributed to the diverse root environments shaped by the thawing depth of the active permafrost layer and the soil structure across different regions, leading to unique vegetation water use strategies. Nonetheless, it is apparent that L. gmelinii has a greater reliance on water from shallow soil depths.
Compared to L. gmelinii, P. sylvestris is able to utilize deeper soil water (110-150 cm). This phenomenon can be ascribed to the more extensive root distribution exhibited by P. sylvestris. Plants with deep root systems are capable of accessing deep soil water and groundwater more effectively than those with shallow roots (Nie et al., 2011; Dai et al., 2015). Song et al. (2016) demonstrated that 98% of P. sylvestris roots were located at depths up to 1 meter. In spring and autumn, these trees predominantly utilized soil water from the upper 40 cm layer, while in summer, to accommodate increased transpiration, they accessed both deeper soil water (40-60 cm) and groundwater. In addition, water use patterns also vary with the tree age. For example, Huo et al. (2018) found that trees aged 15 and 22 years exhibited a higher utilization of deep soil water (80-200 cm) and groundwater compared to their younger counterparts aged 4 and 8 years. Given the greater robustness of the P. sylvestris samples compared to L. gmelinii and B. platyphylla (2.1), we speculate that the age of P. sylvestris is slightly higher than that of the latter species. This may also result in P. sylvestris being able to utilize deeper soil water.
B. platyphylla accessed soil water from the 0-110 cm layer at a rate of 68.9%, mirroring that of L. gmelinii, yet its exploitation of deeper soil layers exceeded that observed in L. gmelinii. Additionally, B. platyphylla showed a greater reliance on water from the intermediate soil layer (40-110 cm). Rao et al. (2020) demonstrated that in the cold-dry month of May, B. platyphylla accesses water from multiple soil depths up to 140 cm. However, during the warm-wet period of October, the species derives over 70% of its water from the 60-80 cm layer. Under conditions of adequate water supply, B. platyphylla predominantly extracts water from the middle soil layer. In comparison to L. gmelinii, it taps less into the deeper soil water resources.
Plants with dimorphic roots are capable of alternating their water source from shallow to deep soil layers (Nie et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2015). Additionally, the ability of the absorbent layer to facilitate transfer between these layers reflects the ecological plasticity of the vegetation (Valladares et al., 2007). Greater ecological plasticity correlates with enhanced environmental adaptability (Wang et al., 2017). From July to September, the water demand and transpiration of vegetation reach their maximum for the year due to higher temperatures. During these months, L. gmelinii primarily transitions between shallow and middle soil layers for water uptake, while P. sylvestris and B. platyphylla utilize water sources across shallow, middle, and deep layers. P. sylvestris demonstrates greater flexibility in shifting water absorption layers compared to L. gmelinii and B. platyphylla. Thus, we can conclude among the three tree species, P. sylvestris exhibits the highest ecological plasticity, followed by B. platyphylla, with L. gmelinii displaying the lowest. More specifically, P. sylvestris exhibits superior environmental adaptability compared to the other two species. Moreover, precipitation substantially impacts the water absorption capabilities of vegetation (Wu et al., 2015). Continuous rainfall before the sampling date of July 26 caused the water uptake for the three tree species to be largely confined to the shallow and middle layers of the soil. Notably, the water uptake of L. gmelinii was the most pronounced, consuming up to 64.1% of the water from the shallow layer.
4.4 Implications of water sources for different species
In recent years, the susceptibility of tree growth to temperature has decreased in relatively humid boreal forests (Briffa et al., 1998). This may be attributed to the greater water demand of plants due to global warming (Barber et al., 2000; Sugimoto et al., 2002; Grube et al., 2017). In permafrost regions, permafrost degradation accelerates water infiltration and evaporation, disrupting the hydrological cycle between vegetation and permafrost and increasing water stress on vegetation (Chen et al., 2022). As a dominant tree in the permafrost regions of the Greater Khingan Mountains, L. gmelinii has shallow roots and a high demand for shallow soil water (Sugimoto et al., 2002). Currently, the permafrost thawing period provides sufficient water during its growing season. However, over time, ongoing permafrost degradation leads to deeper thawing of the active layer, causing soil water to migrate downward under gravity, while water in the surface soil is subject to evaporation. When the soil can no longer provide sufficient water for L. gmelinii, its roots may extend deeper, or it may gradually be replaced by other species. Consequently, the growth of L. gmelinii is greatly affected, and this view is supported by numerous studies. Since the 1980s, the radial growth of L. gmelinii has significantly reduced (Chen et al., 2022). Moreover, the degradation of the permafrost can cause a large loss of nutrients in the soil, substantially affecting the growth of L. gmelinii (Bai et al., 2016). The degradation of the permafrost may thus lead to the decline of L. gmelinii (Chen et al., 2022). P. sylvestris exhibits low water demand and transpiration rates, enabling it to adapt to environmental changes by modulating its water absorption across different soil layers (Sugimoto, 2001). Furthermore, P. sylvestris is less affected by permafrost degradation and can survive in dry climates (Sugimoto et al., 2002). Based on our results, we predict that permafrost degradation can release water and nutrients, which may favor vegetation growth. Over time, the three tree species will be affected to different degrees, with L. gmelinii receiving the greatest impact and P. sylvestris the least. However, this study has certain limitations. Isotopic fractionation may occur during soil water uptake by vegetation, potentially biasing the results of the direct comparison method. While the MixSIAR model can handle more complex data, it may introduce uncertainty in the determination of end-members.
5 Conclusion
In this study, the isotopic signatures of hydrogen and oxygen were used to determine the water sources of three vegetation species, namely, L. gmelinii, P. sylvestris and B. platyphylla, from June to October 2019, in the Greater Khingan Mountains. The results revealed that L. gmelinii primarily utilized shallow soil water, B. platyphylla generally accessed middle soil water, and P. sylvestris mainly relied on both middle and deep soil water. P. sylvestris was identified as being more capable of adapting to environmental changes. Permafrost degradation was suggested to have the greatest impact on L. gmelinii, while P. sylvestris was observed to be the least affected. This study provides valuable insights into the impact of permafrost degradation on three vegetation species.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
BL: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Investigation. XW: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. XD: Writing – review & editing, Software, Validation. HM: Software, Writing – review & editing, Validation. CL: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. SiZ: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. JH: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. ShZ: Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 41971151), the Key Joint Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) and Heilongjiang Province for Regional Development (No. U20A2082), the Science & Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program (Grant No. 2022FY100701), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41941015, 32061143032), and the West Light Foundation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the reviewers who provided valuable suggestions for this article and the support of the Graduate Academic Forum of Harbin Normal University.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Asbjornsen, H., Shepherd, G., Helmers, M., Mora, G. (2008). Seasonal patterns in depth of water uptake under contrasting annual and perennial systems in the Corn Belt Region of the Midwestern U.S. Plant Soil 308, 69–92. doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9607-3
Bai, X. P., Chang, Y. X., Zhang, X. L., Ma, Y. J., Wu, T., Li, J. X., et al. (2016). Impacts of rapid warming on radial growth of Larix gmelinii on two typical micro-topographies in the recent 30 years. J. Appl. Ecol. 27, 3853–3861. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201612.036
Barber, V. A., Juday, G. P., Finney, B. P. (2000). Reduced growth of Alaskan white spruce in the twentieth century from temperature-induced drought stress. Nature 405, 668–673. doi: 10.1038/35015049
Biskaborn, B. K., Smith, S. L., Noetzli, J., Matthes, H., Vieira, G., Streletskiy, D. A., et al. (2019). Permafrost is warming at a global scale. Nat. Commun. 10, 264. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08240-4
Blume-Werry, G., Milbau, A., Teuber, L. M., Johansson, M., Dorrepaal, E. (2019). Dwelling in the deep–strongly increased root growth and rooting depth enhance plant interactions with thawing permafrost soil. New Phytol. 223, 1328–1339. doi: 10.1111/nph.15903
Briffa, K. R., Schweingruber, F. H., Jones, P. D., Osborn, T. J., Shiyatov, S. G., Vaganov, E. A. (1998). Reduced sensitivity of recent tree-growth to temperature at high northern latitudes. Nature 391, 678–682. doi: 10.1038/35596
Chen, S. Y., Wei, P. J., Wu, T. H., Wu, Q. B., Luo, F. D. (2023). Effect of permafrost degradation on carbon sequestration of alpine ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 899, 165642. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165642
Chen, Z., Zhang, Y., Li, Z., Han, S., Wang, X. (2022). Climate change increased the intrinsic water use efficiency of Larix gmelinii in permafrost degradation areas, but did not promote its growth. Agric. For. Meteorology 320, 108957. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.108957
Cheng, G., Wu, T. (2007). Responses of permafrost to climate change and their environmental significance, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. J. Geophysical Res. Earth Surface 112 (F2). doi: 10.1029/2006JF000631
Churakova-Sidorova, O. V., Lienert, S., Timofeeva, G., Siegwolf, R., Saurer, M. (2020). Measured and modelled source water δ18O based on tree-ring cellulose of larch and pine trees from the permafrost zone. iForest - Biogeosciences Forestry 13, 224–229. doi: 10.3832/ifor3212-013
Dai, Y., Zheng, X. J., Tang, L. S., Li, Y. (2015). Stable oxygen isotopes reveal distinct water use patterns of two Haloxylon species in the Gurbantonggut Desert. Plant Soil 389, 73–87. doi: 10.1007/s11104-014-2342-z
Ding, Y., Nie, Y., Chen, H., Wang, K., Querejeta, J. I. (2021). Water uptake depth is coordinated with leaf water potential, water-use efficiency and drought vulnerability in karst vegetation. New Phytol. 229, 1339–1353. doi: 10.1111/nph.v229.3
Dodd, M. B., Lauenroth, W. K., Welker, J. M. (1998). Differential water resource use by herbaceous and woody plant life-forms in a shortgrass steppe community. Oecologia 117, 504–512. doi: 10.1007/s004420050686
Dong, X., Liu, C., Li, M., Ma, D., Zang, S. (2021). Variations in active layer soil hydrothermal dynamics of typical wetlands in permafrost region in the Great Hing'an Mountains, northeast China. Ecol. Indic. 129, 107880. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107880
Drake, P. L., Franks, P. J. (2003). Water resource partitioning, stem xylem hydraulic properties, and plant water use strategies in a seasonally dry riparian tropical rainforest. Oecologia 137, 321–329. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1352-y
Grube, S., Fleiner, R., Guegan, E., Panday, P., Schmid, M., Stumm, D., et al. (2017). Review article: Inferring permafrost and permafrost thaw in the mountains of the Hindu Kush Himalaya region. Cryosphere 11, 81–99. doi: 10.5194/tc-11-81-2017
Hao, S., Li, F. (2021). Water sources of the typical desert vegetation in Ebinur Lake basin. Acta Geographica Sin. 76, 1649–1661. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2010.0320
Hinkel, K. M., Paetzold, F., Nelson, F. E., Bockheim, J. G. (2001). Patterns of soil temperature and moisture in the active layer and upper permafrost at Barrow, Alaska: 1993–1999. Global Planetary Change 29, 293–309. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8181(01)00096-0
Huo, G., Zhao, X., Gao, X., Wang, S., Pan, Y. (2018). Seasonal water use patterns of rainfed jujube trees in stands of different ages under semiarid Plantations in China. Agriculture Ecosyst. Environ. 265, 392–401. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2018.06.028
Laur, J., Hacke, U. G. (2014). Exploring Picea glauca aquaporins in the context of needle water uptake and xylem refilling. New Phytol. 203, 388–400. doi: 10.1111/nph.2014.203.issue-2
Li, C., Sun, H., Liu, L., Dou, T., Zhou, M., Li, W., et al. (2022). The importance of permafrost in the steady and fast increase in net primary production of the grassland on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. Catena 211, 105964. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105964
Ma, X., Zhu, J., Wang, Y., Yan, W., Zhao, C. (2021). Variations in water use strategies of sand-binding vegetation along a precipitation gradient in sandy regions, northern China. J. Hydrology 600, 126539. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126539
Mccole, A. A., Stern, L. A. (2007). Seasonal water use patterns of Juniperus ashei on the Edwards Plateau, Texas, based on stable isotopes in water. J. Hydrology 342, 238–248. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.05.024
Nie, Y., Chen, H., Wang, K., Tan, W., Deng, P., Yang, J. (2011). Seasonal water use patterns of woody species growing on the continuous dolostone outcrops and nearby thin soils in subtropical China. Plant Soil 341, 399–412. doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0653-2
Oliva, M., Fritz, M. (2018). Permafrost degradation on a warmer Earth: Challenges and perspectives. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health 5, 14–18. doi: 10.1016/j.coesh.2018.03.007
Priyadarshini, K. V. R., Prins, H. H. T., de Bie, S., Heitkonig, I. M. A., Woodborne, S., Gort, G., et al. (2016). Seasonality of hydraulic redistribution by trees to grasses and changes in their water-source use that change tree-grass interactions. Ecohydrology 9, 218–228. doi: 10.1002/eco.1624
Rao, W., Chen, X., Meredith, K. T., Tan, H., Gao, M., Liu, J. (2020). Water uptake of riparian plants in the lower Lhasa River Basin, South Tibetan Plateau using stable water isotopes. Hydrological Processes 34, 3492–3505. doi: 10.1002/hyp.v34.16
Romanovsky, V. E., Smith, S. L., Christiansen, H. H. (2010). Permafrost thermal state in the polar Northern Hemisphere during the international polar year 2007–2009: a synthesis. Permafrost Periglacial Processes 21, 106–116. doi: 10.1002/ppp.v21:2
Rossatto, D. R., Silva, L. C. R., Sternberg, L. S. L., Franco, A. C. (2014). Do woody and herbaceous species compete for soil water across topographic gradients? Evidence for niche partitioning in a Neotropical savanna. South Afr. J. Bot. 91, 14–18. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2013.11.011
Schwendenmann, L., Pendall, E., Sanchez-Bragado, R., Kunert, N., HöLscher, D. (2015). Tree water uptake in a tropical plantation varying in tree diversity: interspecific differences, seasonal shifts and complementarity. Ecohydrology 8, 1–12. doi: 10.1002/eco.1479
Song, L., Zhu, J., Li, M., Zhang, J., Lv, L. (2016). Sources of water used by Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica trees based on stable isotope measurements in a semiarid sandy region of Northeast China. Agric. Water Manage. 164), 281–290. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.10.018
Sprenger, M., Leistert, H., Gimbel, K., Weiler, M. (2016). Illuminating hydrological processes at the soil-vegetation-atmosphere interface with water stable isotopes. Rev. Geophysics 54, 674–704. doi: 10.1002/2015RG000515
Stock, B. C., Jackson, A. L., Ward, E. J., Parnell, A. C., Semmens, B. X. (2018). Analyzing mixing systems using a new generation of Bayesian tracer mixing models. PeerJ 6), e5096. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5096
Sugimoto, A. (2001). “Spatial and seasonal variations in surface soil moisture around Yakutsk observed in 2000”. in Proceedings of GAME/Siberia Workshop. (GAME Publication) 30, 63–73.
Sugimoto, A., Yanagisawa, N., Naito, D., Fujita, N., Maximov, T. C. (2002). Importance of permafrost as a source of water for plants in east Siberian taiga. Ecol. Res. 17), 493–503. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00506.x
Sun, J., Sun, X., Wang, G., Dong, W., Hu, Z., Sun, S., et al. (2024). Soil water components control plant water uptake along a subalpine elevation gradient on the Eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Agric. For. Meteorology 345, 109827. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109827
Sun, S. J., Meng, P., Zhang, J. S., Wan, X. (2011). Variation in soil water uptake and its effect on plant water status in Juglans regia L. during dry and wet seasons. Tree Physiol. 31, 1378–1389. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpr116
Swaffer, B. A., Holland, K. L., Doody, T. M., Li, C., John, H. (2014). Water use strategies of two co-occurring tree species in a semi-arid karst environment. Hydrological Processes 28, 1–15. doi: 10.1002/hyp.v28.4
Tao, S., Guo, Q., Li, C., Wang, Z., Fang, J. (2016). Global patterns and determinants of forest canopy height. Ecology 97, 3265–3270. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2016.97.issue-12
Tchebakova, N. M., Parfenova, E., Soja, A. (2009). The effects of climate, permafrost and fire on vegetation change in Siberia in a changing climate. Environ. Res. Lett. 4, 045013. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/045013
Tiemuerbieke, B., Min, X. J., Zang, Y. X., Xing, P., Ma, J. Y., Wei, S. (2018). Water use patterns of co-occurring C3and C4shrubs in the Gurbantonggut desert in northwestern China. Sci. Total Environ. 634, 341–354. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.307
Valladares, F., Gianoli, E., Gómez, J. M. (2007). Ecological limits to plant phenotypic plasticity. New Phytol. 176, 749–763. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02275.x
Wang, J., Fu, B., Lu, N., Li, Z. (2017). Seasonal variation in water uptake patterns of three plant species based on stable isotopes in the semi-arid Loess Plateau. Sci. total Environ. 609, 27–37. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.133
Wang, P., Song, X., Han, D., Zhang, Y., Liu, X. (2010). A study of root water uptake of crops indicated by hydrogen and oxygen stable isotopes: A case in Shanxi Province, China. Agric. Water Manage. 97, 475–482. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.11.008
Wu, H., Li, X. Y., Jiang, Z., Chen, H., Zhang, C., XIao, X. (2016). Contrasting water use pattern of introduced and native plants in an alpine desert ecosystem, Northeast Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Sci. Total Environ. 542, 182–191. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.121
Wu, Y., Zhou, H., Zheng, X. J., Li, Y., Tang, L. S. (2015). Seasonal changes in the water use strategies of three co-occurring desert shrubs. Hydrological Processes 28, 6265–6275. doi: 10.1002/hyp.v28.26
Xia, C., Liu, G., Mei, J., Meng, Y., Liu, W., Hu, Y. (2019). Characteristics of hydrogen and oxygen stable isotopes in precipitation and the environmental controls in tropical monsoon climatic zone. Int. J. hydrogen Energy 44, 5417–5427. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.171
Xu, Q., Li, H., Chen, J., Cheng, X., Liu, S., An, S. (2011). Water use patterns of three species in subalpine forest, Southwest China: the deuterium isotope approach. Ecohydrology 4, 236–244. doi: 10.1002/eco.v4.2
Yang, B., Wen, X., Sun, X. (2015). Seasonal variations in depth of water uptake for a subtropical coniferous plantation subjected to drought in an East Asian monsoon region. Agric. For. Meteorology 201, 218–228. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.11.020
Zhang, M. L., Zhou, Z. X., Wen, Z., Zhou, F. X., Ma, Z., Lei, B. B. (2023). Thermal–moisture dynamics and thermal stability of active layer in response to wet/dry conditions in the central region of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, China. Res Cold Arid Regions 15 (1), 27–38. doi: 10.1016/j.rcar.2023.04.002
Keywords: climate change, vegetation growth, permafrost degradation, xylem water, mixing model
Citation: Li B, Wu X, Dong X, Man H, Liu C, Zou S, He J and Zang S (2024) Soil water uptake from different depths of three tree species indicated by hydrogen and oxygen stable isotopes in the permafrost region of Northeast China. Front. Plant Sci. 15:1444811. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1444811
Received: 06 June 2024; Accepted: 17 September 2024;
Published: 04 October 2024.
Edited by:
Dayong Fan, Beijing Forestry University, ChinaReviewed by:
Feng Chen, Yunnan University, ChinaXiangjin Shen, Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Environment, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China
Copyright © 2024 Li, Wu, Dong, Man, Liu, Zou, He and Zang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Shuying Zang, enN5NjMxMUBocmJudS5lZHUuY24=