94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
Jordan B. Van Brenk1†
Sarah Courbier1,2,3†
Celestin L. Kleijweg1
Julian C. Verdonk1
Leo F. M. Marcelis1*- 1Horticulture and Product Physiology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands
- 2Faculty of Biology II, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- 3Centre for Integrative Biological Signalling Studies (CIBSS), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
by Van Brenk JB, Courbier S, Kleijweg CL, Verdonk JC and Marcelis LFM (2024). Front. Plant Sci. 15:1383100. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1383100
Text Correction
In the published article, there was an error. In the Abstract, the word “Increasing” was used instead of “Decreasing” in the following sentence: “Increasing the R:B ratio from R:B87.5:12.5 to R:B60:40, there was a decrease in fresh weight (20%) and carbohydrate concentration (48% reduction in both sugars and starch), whereas pigment concentrations (anthocyanins, chlorophyll, and carotenoids), phenolic compounds, and various minerals all increased.”
A correction has been made to the Abstract. This sentence previously stated:
“Increasing the R:B ratio from R:B87.5:12.5 to R:B60:40, there was a decrease in fresh weight (20%) and carbohydrate concentration (48% reduction in both sugars and starch), whereas pigment concentrations (anthocyanins, chlorophyll, and carotenoids), phenolic compounds, and various minerals all increased.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“Decreasing the R:B ratio from R:B87.5:12.5 to R:B60:40, there was a decrease in fresh weight (20%) and carbohydrate concentration (48% reduction in both sugars and starch), whereas pigment concentrations (anthocyanins, chlorophyll, and carotenoids), phenolic compounds, and various minerals all increased. ”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: controlled environment agriculture, light quality, far-red light, red:blue ratio, nutritional quality, metabolic compounds, product physiology
Citation: Van Brenk JB, Courbier S, Kleijweg CL, Verdonk JC and Marcelis LFM (2024) Corrigendum: Paradise by the far-red light: Far-red and red:blue ratios independently affect yield, pigments, and carbohydrate production in lettuce, Lactuca sativa. Front. Plant Sci. 15:1442349. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1442349
Received: 02 June 2024; Accepted: 11 June 2024;
Published: 18 June 2024.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Antonio Pannico, University of Naples Federico II, ItalyCopyright © 2024 Van Brenk, Courbier, Kleijweg, Verdonk and Marcelis. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Leo F. M. Marcelis, bGVvLm1hcmNlbGlzQHd1ci5ubA==
†These authors share first authorship