South America holds the greatest diversity of native daisies (Asteraceae) in the world: an updated catalogue supporting continental-scale conservation

Asteraceae is the world’s richest plant family and is found on all continents, in environments ranging from the coast to the highest mountains. The family shows all growth forms and, as in other angiosperm families, species richness is concentrated in tropical regions. South America has the highest diversity of Asteraceae in the world, yet taxonomic and distributional knowledge gaps remain. This study compiles an updated catalog of Asteraceae native to South America, based on national and regional checklists and ongoing large-scale flora projects. The resulting checklist includes a total of 6,940 species and 564 genera native to South America to date, which represent about a quarter of the family’s global diversity. Countries already considered to be megadiverse show the greatest diversity, such as Brazil with 2,095 species, followed by Peru (1,588), Argentina (1,377), and Colombia (1,244), with this diversity mainly focused on the Brazilian Highlands and the Andes. Species endemism also peaks in Brazil, but Sørensen distances reveal the Chilean flora to be eminently different from the rest of the continent. Tribes better represented in the continent are Eupatorieae, Senecioneae and Astereae, also with a remarkably presence of entirely South American subfamilies representing earliest diverging lineages of the Asteraceae, such as Barnadesioideae, Wunderlichioideae, Famatinanthoideae, and Stifftioideae. It is estimated that the discovery and description curves have not yet stabilized, and the number of species is likely to increase by 5 to 10% in the coming years, posing major challenges to continental-scale conservation.

Introduction

Cataloguing the estimated 20% of the undescribed plant life before it is lost has never been more urgent (Joppa et al., 2011; Grace et al., 2021). The United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity’s Global Strategy for Plant Conservation proposed five main objectives: understanding, documentation and recognition of plant diversity, its effective conservation, and its sustainable use and public awareness (United Nation’s Convention on Biological Diversity, 2011).

These objectives are difficult to address due to what is known as “plant awareness disparity”, associated with urban societies’ disconnection from plants (Parsley, 2020). The disconnection is difficult to cope with, given persistent and significant knowledge gaps and shortcomings in the sense of taxonomic, distributional and phylogenetic information (Hortal et al., 2015). These gaps become even more evident when trying to assess conservation efforts on a continental scale (Habel et al., 2013), as is the case of South America. The human footprint is rapidly expanding in the continent (Zalles et al., 2021), leading many ecosystems and species to be classified as threatened.

Efforts to scientifically document the floristic diversity of South America have been continuous since the 17th Century, including renowned expeditions by naturalists such as Alexander von Humboldt, Aimé Bonpland, Georg Markgraaf, Alexandre Ferreira, Louis Feuillée, Carl Friedrich Philipp von Martius and Charles Darwin, to name a few. Also, European naturalists and botanists that settled in the Americas, contributed significantly to botanical knowledge, as in the case of José Celestino Mutis, Rodulfo Amando Philippi and José Cuatrecasas. Several botanical communities developed strongly with the advent of modern times, mainly in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Peru.

The late 20th century set the stage for important regional checklists like Tropicos (https://www.tropicos.org/) led by the Missouri Botanical Garden, the BDG program to document the flora of the Guianas or Mesoamerican Flora. These initiatives have promoted accuracy and authoritative knowledge in taxonomy and nomenclature in the Neotropics, reflected in multiple species lists, herbarium specimens confirming locations, and regional checklists and floras with reliable information.

Tropicos initiative revealed the presence of almost 125,000 vascular plant species in the Americas, from which 82,000 are from South America (Ulloa Ulloa et al., 2017). According to this evaluation, Brazil holds the most diverse vascular plant flora, with more than 33,000 species, followed by Colombia with around 24,000 species, and Peru with around 19,000 species. As reference in North America: Mexico, another megadiverse country, harbors almost 23,000 species. These numbers are not yet stabilizing, with a description rate of 744 species per year over the last 25 years (Ulloa Ulloa et al., 2017).

The daisy family (Asteraceae) is considered as the world richest plant family and has a global diversity of between 25,000 and 30,000 species ranging from the polar circles to the Equator (Funk et al., 2009; Palazzesi et al., 2022). According to the last global account (Panero and Crozier, 2016), at the global scale diversity peaks in South America (6,316 species), followed by Asia (6,016 spp.), North America (5,404 spp.), Africa (4,631 spp.), Europe (2,288 spp.) and Australasia (1,444 spp.)

The family has been recognized as the second most diverse vascular plant family in the Americas with ca. 12,000 species, after Orchidaceae (ca. 13,000) and ahead Fabaceae (7,000), with Brazil, Colombia and Peru being the richest countries in Asteraceae species (Ulloa Ulloa et al., 2017).

Asteraceae have undergone a series of dispersals and explosive radiation events since they appeared in the late Cretaceous (Viviana et al., 2015; Mandel et al., 2019), and are currently major components of subtropical biomes worldwide (Funk et al., 2009), showing all possible growth forms from trees to herbs, including shrubs, vines, succulents and specific forms such as the rosette trees from Juan Fernández Islands. A key morphological component in the global dispersal of Asteraceae is the pappus, a main part of the floral function of a typical Asteraceae (Figure 1). Capitula-like inflorescences are present in related families like Calyceraceae and Goodeniaceae but are not as diverse as in Asteraceae (Zhang and Elomaa, 2021). As phylogenetic knowledge of the family grows and improves, the systematic knowledge at the tribe and subfamily levels increases. Currently 50 tribes are recognized within the family (Susanna et al., 2020) and phylogenetic and biogeographic knowledge is continuously being updated (Heiden et al., 2019; Siniscalchi et al., 2019; Moreira-Muñoz et al., 2020).

Figure 1

Figure 1 Diversity in growth form and floral morphology in representatives of the Asteraceae across South America: (A) Espeletia hartwegiana Sch. Bip. ex Cuatrec., from the Andean Páramos; (B) Espeletia summapacis Cuatrec., from the Colombian Páramos; (C) tree species Archidasyphyllum excelsum (D. Don) Cabrera, from coastal central Chile; (D) Senecio humillimus Sch. Bip. ex Wedd., creeping species from the Central Andes; (E) Senecio formosoides Cuatrec., representative of the most species-rich genus at the continental scale; (F) Stifftia fruticosa (Vell.) D.J.N. Hind & Semir, Brazilian representative of the subfamily Stifftioideae; (G) Wunderlichia insignis Baillon, an endemic species from Brazilian inselbergs and representative of the subfamily Wunderlichioideae; (H) Gypothamnium pinifolium Phil., representative of a monospecific genus from Atacama; (I) Inflorescence in Central Andean Polyachyrus sphaerocephalus D. Don. [photo credits: F.A. Avila, M. Monge, A. Moreira-Muñoz].

As noted, naturalists like José Celestino Mutis (1732–1808) or botanists like José Cuatrecasas (1903–1996) settled in the Americas and contributed significantly to knowledge of the family. Botanists such as Angel L. Cabrera (1908–1999) in Argentina, Graziela Barroso (1912–2003) in Brazil, Leandro Aristeguieta (1923–2012) in Venezuela, or Santiago Díaz-Piedrahita (1944–2014) in Colombia, produced printed checklists and revisions at the country scale and over extensive regions (e.g (Cabrera, 1978)), so that several countries attained adequate knowledge of the family (Katinas et al., 2007).

Through the last decade, several countries assumed the challenge of documenting their floras as a national priority, as was the case with Brazil (BFG (The Brazilian Flora Group), 2018; BFG (The Brazilian Flora Group), 2022), incorporating hundreds of botanists from the region to achieve this goal. Nevertheless, several countries still lack a national catalogue and sampling efforts are still scarce even in most populated areas (Oliveira et al., 2021).

Nevertheless, the continuously growing knowledge has been used as a main source for evaluating numbers of threatened species (e.g (Nakajima et al., 2012)), but the efforts have not been equally performed from one country to another. Additionally, the conservation and sustainable use of native Asteraceae is not of merely botanical interest, but it is in support of ancestral livelihoods and ethnobotanical relations across the continent (e.g (Gutiérrez et al., 2020). They also appear as a target in regional climate change studies (Sklenář et al., 2021).

As a commitment made in several regional botanical meetings, we undertook the challenge of compiling an up-to-date catalog of the Asteraceae at the continental scale. Taking account of species’ description, revision rates, and the specific need for disaggregated information by country to promote continental-level conservation actions, we compiled regional checklists and country level revisions together with the most recent monographs and taxonomic updates (Luebert et al., 2017; Roque et al., 2017; Dillon et al., 2021).

In such a dynamic scientific field, following the assessment by (Ulloa Ulloa et al., 2017), we expect the number of species at the national level to increase by around 50 to 100 species between years 2017 and 2022.

Methods

Geographic area

The study area is South America, a continent covering around 17,800,000 km². South America includes 12 countries and one dependent territory: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname, Uruguay, and Venezuela. French Guiana, as an overseas department of France, was included in the analysis, as well as the dependent territories of Malvinas (Falkland) Islands (administered by the United Kingdom and disputed by Argentina). It also included the Galápagos Islands of Ecuador and Chile’s Juan Fernández archipelago in the analysis. Other island territories were not included in the study (see Supplementary Materials).

Catalogue of South American Asteraceae

We compiled the most updated national checklists, floras and taxonomic revisions (See Supplementary Materials) to analyze the richness and diversity of Asteraceae in South America. Main reference works are dated from 1990 to 2020. Latest particular distributional o taxonomical works on Asteraceae from South America were included.

We searched for synonyms and taxonomic inconsistencies to integrate this basic national data compilation. We manually checked for all taxa, as well as adding recently described species since the publication of the consulted checklists in IPNI (we closed the search by July 2022).

Taxa were then compiled into one spreadsheet and reviewed for inconsistencies in names, authors, and description dates. We included information about synonyms and the condition of native/endemic. We met regularly online to resolve taxonomic differences and equivocal names. Potential questionable remaining taxa were examined on a case-by-case basis using POWO (Plants of the World Online; https://powo.science.kew.org/), Tropicos (https://www.tropicos.org/home), and the Global Compositae Database (https://www.compositae.org/gcd.php)

We compared our list with Global Compositae Database. 2022. Available at: https://www.compositae.org/gcd.php. (consulted on July 30, 2022) and BFG (2018 onwards).

With a first compilation in hand, we checked with the most authoritative list available so far at the continental scale, which is the “integrated assessment of the vascular plant species of the Americas”, published by (Ulloa Ulloa et al., 2017). The catalogue is available as Supplementary Dataset 1.

Country-level distribution, endemism, and threatened species

We extracted the distribution at the country level from the compiled checklist, including diversity per subfamily and tribe and level of endemism in each country.

Floristic similarity among the 13 countries can be obtained by means of nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) based on Sørensen distance. For the NMDS analysis, an absence/presence matrix was built with rows (countries) and columns (species). The analysis and graphics were performed using the vegan package in R (see Supplementary Materials, Supplementary Figure 5).

The graphics depicting tribes by country were generated by enumerating the number of species present in each tribe across South American countries. Using the recorded tribe data for each country, a bar graph was constructed. The resulting images were processed in Illustrator 2020 (ver. v24.3.0, Adobe) (Supplementary Figures 6A–M). We added a taxonomic key to the subfamilies occurring in South America.

We searched for “Asteraceae” and “South America” in The IUCN Red List (https://www.iucnredlist.org). The global list is based on the information available for each species at a time. Species that are assessed can be categorized as “threatened” (Critically Endangered, Endangered, or Vulnerable = CR, EN, VU) or “of conservation concern” (including CR, EN, VU, in addition to Near Threatened or Extinct in the Wild (NT, EW) (Supplementary Tables 5, 6). For this instance, progresses at national level were not considered, which will be reviewed in future works (Lopez-Gallego et al., 2024).

Results

Our verified taxonomic dataset records 6,940 native species and 564 genera of Asteraceae in South America. Brazil has the richest native Asteraceae flora, with 2,095 species, followed by Peru (1,588), Argentina (1,377), and Colombia (1,244) (Table 1; Figure 2; Supplementary Dataset 1).

Table 1

Table 1 Synthesis of the numbers of subfamilies, tribes, genera, species and endemic species in each South American country.

Figure 2

Figure 2 Map of South America representing the diversity of the family across the continent. The map was elaborated with the native/endemic species numbers per country from Table 1, by means of ArcGIS Online (www.arcgis.com). The resulting image was processed in Illustrator 2020 (ver. v24.3.0, Adobe). A daisy symbol was used to depict the proportion of each category and its size was adjusted to reflect species proportions present in each country. The size of the symbols represents the number of species per country. Purple represents the proportion of endemic species in each country.

Native South American species are grouped into 564 genera represented in the flora. The most species-rich genera are the widely distributed Senecio (652 spp, Senecioneae), Baccharis (378 spp, Astereae), Mikania (377 spp, Eupatorieae), Pentacalia (189 spp, Senecioneae), and Stevia (148 spp, Eupatorieae) (Supplementary Dataset 1). Most genera are represented by fewer than 20 species and are endemic to one or two countries (Supplementary Figure 2).

Of the 6,940 native Asteraceae species in South America, a large proportion (69%; or 4,794 species) is endemic to a single country, while only eight species occur in 12 countries. None of the species is found in all countries and territories. In turn, Brazil is the country with the largest number of endemic species, 1,353, followed by Peru (913) and Colombia (627) (Table 1; Supplementary Table 2; Supplementary Dataset 1).

Considering only endemic species by the respective country’s area, the most endemic-rich country is Ecuador (14.3 spp/10,000 km²), followed by Peru (7.1 spp/10,000 km²) (Supplementary Figures 3, 4). The genus Mikania (Eupatorieae) has the largest number of endemic species by country, with 137 endemic species in Brazil.

Floristic similarity among the 13 countries analyzed has been approached by means of nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) (Supplementary Figure 5). Brazil shares most of its flora with Paraguay and Uruguay, while the Guyanas appear closer together. Ecuador, Colombia and Peru show commonality among their florae, while Chile appears as isolated.

The family is represented by 30 of 50 currently recognized tribes (APG IV, 2016; Susanna et al., 2020). The richest tribe is Eupatorieae, with 1,448 species, followed by Senecioneae with 1,270 and Astereae with 875 (Supplementary Table 1). Each country has different proportions of representatives of tribes within the family (Supplementary Figure 6).

The most species-rich subfamily is Asteroideae including 16 tribes and 5,235 species (Supplementary Tables 2–4). Other subfamilies are represented by one to three tribes, with a remarkably presence of entirely South American subfamilies representing earliest diverging lineages of the Asteraceae, such as Barnadesioideae, Wunderlichioideae, Famatinanthoideae, and Stifftioideae. The country with the highest presence of subfamilies and tribes is Argentina, with 10 subfamilies and 27 tribes represented in its flora (Table 1; Supplementary Tables 2, 3).

Key to South American subfamilies of Asteraceae

Key based on (Anderberg et al., 2007; Katinas and Funk, 2020) and own observations.

1. Florets with simple, uniseriate, 3-celled hairs (barnadesioid trichomes) … Barnadesioideae

1’. Florets without such hair, usually with many hair types or glabrous … 2

2. Florets with corolla bilabiate, subbilabiate, ligulate, tubular deeply lobed; style branches short or long, with rounded papillae or glabrous … 3

3. Style with papillae wider than tall or glabrous … 4

4. Style with papillae wider than tall, composed of cobblestone-like units comprising several epidermal cells … Famatinanthoideae

4’. Style usually glabrous, when papillose composed of single, slightly protruding epidermal cells … 5

5. Capitula homogamous, florets with corolla tubular; apical anther appendiges apiculate … Gochnatioidea

5’. Capitula homogamous or heterogamous, florets with corolla bilabiate, tubular or marginal bilabiate and central tubular; apical anther appendiges acute … Stifftioideae

3’. Style with papillae longer than width … 6

6. Florets with corolla bilabiate, or bilabiate or subbilabiate and tubular; style with papillae only on branches, sometimes below the bifurcation, or with papillae at the apices; papillae simple with 1 epidermal cell … Mutisioideae

6’. Florets with corolla tubular; style with papillae on the branches and shaft; papillae multi-seriate with 2 or 3 epidermal cells … Wunderlichioideae

2’. Florets with corolla tubular, deeply or shortly lobed, ligulate, or marginal ligulate and central tubular, rarely reduced or absent; style branches short or long, with acute papillae or hairs, covering the branches, sometimes below the bifurcation, at the apices or with a ring of papillae below the bifurcation, rarely glabrous, sometimes with long papillose sterile appendages … 7

7. Florets with corolla tubular deeply lobed, ligulate, or marginal ligulate and central tubular; all florets or central florets with style branches long and slender, free or fused leaving the apices free, with a ring of acute papillae below the bifurcation or dorsally covering the branches to below the bifurcation … 8

8. All florets with style branches long and slender, fused leaving the apices free, with a ring of acute papillae below bifurcation (carduoid style) … Carduoideae

8’. All florets or central florets with style branches long and slender, free or fused leaving the apices free, with acute papillae dorsally covering the branches to below the bifurcation (vernonioid style) … 9

9. Abundant milky latex; capitula homogamous, florets with corolla ligulate … Cichorioideae

9’. With or without milky latex; capitula homogamous or heterogamous, florets with corolla tubular deeply lobed, or marginal ligulate and central tubular … Vernonioideae

7´. Florets with corolla tubular shortly lobed, or marginal ligulate and central tubular, rarely reduced or absent; all florets, central florets, staminal florets or pistilate florets with style branches long or short, with acute papillae or hairs at the apices, rarely with papillae dorsally covering the branches and shaft, rarely glabrous, sometimes with long papillose sterile appendages … Asteroideae

Threatened status assessment

Specific conservation assessments are very diverse across the continent. To obtain a global vision, we checked species that have been assessed according to IUCN criteria (www.iucnredlist.org). In this sense, 777 taxa of Asteraceae (only 11.2% of the total) have been assessed across the continent: 436 can be considered “threatened” (i.e. “Critically Endangered”, “Endangered” or “Vulnerable”) (Supplementary Table 5). Other 339 species are categorized as “Near Threatened”, “Least Concern”, or “Data Deficient” (Supplementary Table 5). The country with the highest number of threatened species (238) is Ecuador, followed by Colombia (119 species) (Supplementary Table 6). For Colombia, other 390 species are under assessment (Lopez-Gallego et al., 2024). On the one hand, this reflects an increase in land use changes and a retreat in native forests, and on the other the phenomenon that more species have been assessed in Ecuador and Colombia, which is not the case in other countries.

Our analysis also found 177 non-native or introduced species. The countries with the largest numbers of documented introduced species are Argentina (109), Chile (104) and Brazil (87), mainly in subtropical latitudes with the highest demographic concentration and ecosystem alterations. Most introduced species pertain to the Asteroideae (92 species) and to the tribes Cichorieae, Anthemideae, and Cardueae (Supplementary Tables 7, 8). This issue reflects the long history of exchange through maritime trade, mainly with European countries, in addition to cultural links from colonial times to the present.

Description rates

Our compilation shows that the species description and recircumscription rate has not shown a stabilization trend. The description rate differs from one country to another. Over the past 30 years, between six and 100 species have been described (or resurrected) in different countries. The most prolific taxonomists describing South American Asteraceae are J. Cuatrecasas, with 812 names (basionyms or recombinations); while R. M. King and H. Robinson published 708 names (Supplementary Table 9; Supplementary Dataset S1). In total, names are assignable to 488 taxonomists that described species along the continent.

Countries like Brazil and Colombia are considered megadiverse and are among the world’s leading countries for the continued discovery of new species.

Discussion

This is the first attempt to catalog the diversity of Asteraceae in South America by means of a comprehensive checklist. We were able to check inconsistencies between national checklists in the last 30 years, while adding the new taxa described and combined in the last five years, since the report by (Ulloa Ulloa et al., 2017).

South America holds the world greatest diversity of Asteraceae species, corroborating the findings of (Panero and Crozier, 2016). Since the last integrated assessment (Ulloa Ulloa et al., 2017), the number of species increased by 9.5% in Venezuela, 5% in Peru, 4.8% in Brazil and 3.6% in Colombia. Countries like Brazil, Colombia, and Peru are among the world’s leading countries in terms of the numbers of new species discovered per year (Cheek et al., 2020). This is also the case with Ecuador and Bolivia, which show less improvements due to shortcomings in floristic update efforts. All these differences could be explained by difficulties reported by (Panero and Crozier, 2016) to find taxonomic treatments for some genera in large tribes for a worldwide compilation, so our task was facilitated due the more limited scope of our searches. There may be some differences regarding the concept of different species, which is inherent to the taxonomic task (ter Steege et al., 2019).

The four most speciose countries -Brazil, Peru, Argentina, and Colombia- account for 47% of the total species richness of the continent, earning them the category of megadiverse countries (Mittermeier et al., 1997). Asteraceae is one of the major components of the flora of important bioregions in these countries, such as the tropical and subtropical Andes, Páramos, Cerrado, Campos Rupestres, Atlantic Forest, Pampas, and Tepuis (BFG (The Brazilian Flora Group), 2018; Colli-Silva et al., 2019). Future integrated checklists should address the biodiversity for each bioregion. Additionally, mainly based on the new “Flora do Brasil” effort, an estimation of the numbers to be added over the next 30 years, and considering megadiverse Peru, Ecuador, Colombia and Bolivia, allows one to estimate an increase of between 5% and 10% in total numbers by 2050 (Supplementary Figure 7).

Threatened or near-threatened species include many range-restricted and endemic species whose distribution ranges have been reduced due to the advance of the human footprint along the continent (Zalles et al., 2021). The prevalence of non-native or introduced species in the subtropical latitudes reflects the long history of exchange through maritime trade, mainly with European countries, in addition to cultural links from colonial times to the present (Monge et al., 2016; Gutiérrez et al., 2020).

Helping society to overcome current “plant awareness disparity” includes the need for updated knowledge of diversity in broad territories to inform continental-scale conservation actions. Our analyses of diversity of South American Asteraceae make it clear that this is an exceptionally rich flora of broad interest for conservation attention and investment.

The trend of discoveries in the family reinforces the importance of improving sampling efforts at a continental level to close knowledge gaps and better evaluate threatened status. South America is politically and culturally very complex and diverse and has a rapidly growing human footprint, along with limited botanical literacy. It is still a territory prone to new discoveries by plant taxonomists and parataxonomists to work in priority areas supporting community-based conservation initiatives. By adding taxonomic evidence, we provide a better baseline for people from across the continent to further engage with our biocultural heritage and the livelihoods supporting landscape-scale regenerative actions.

Conclusion

Our updated catalogue of Asteraceae native to South America, comprises a total of 6,940 species and 564 genera native to South America to date, which represent about a quarter of the family’s global diversity. Countries that show the greatest diversity are Brazil (2,095 species), Peru (1,588), Argentina (1,377), and Colombia (1,244). Asteraceae is one of the major components of the flora of important bioregions in these countries, such as the tropical and subtropical Andes, Páramos, Cerrado, Campos Rupestres, Atlantic Forest, Pampas, and Tepuis. All these bioregions show a rapidly growing human footprint, posing major challenges for continental-scale conservation.

Author contributions

AM-M: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Writing – original draft. MG: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. FA: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. VM-F: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. GH: Data curation, Investigation, Validation, Writing – original draft. BB: Data curation, Investigation, Validation, Writing – original draft. SB: Data curation, Investigation, Validation, Writing – original draft. JN: Data curation, Investigation, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft. VS: Formal analysis, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft. JR-C: Formal analysis, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft. DG: Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. National Research and Development Agency (ANID-Chile) grant FONDECYT 1221879 (AM-M). Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Brasil (CAPES) finance Code 001) for the PNPD scholarship (MM). FAPEMIG (APQ 00525—021)/FAPESP (20/02207—5) (JN). National Agency for Scientific and Technological Promotion (ANPCyT, Argentina, PICT—2019—03011) (VS, JF-C, DG) and (PICT—2019—02319) (AM-M, MG, VM-F, VS, JF-C, DG). Systematics Research Fund 2015/16, the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development—CNPq (PQ2 314590/2020) (GH), LinnéSys 2021 (GH), and WoRMS Philanthropy Grants 2022 (GH).

Acknowledgments

This contribution was originally a challenge that arose among several of us at the Geography Conference occurred in Arica, Chile, October 2012, that included our first join field work. In those times we enthusiastically called ourselves the “Real Sociedad de Sinanterología de América del Sur”. After a decade and many meetings and field works, we can offer this catalogue, that can be considered as “work in progress”. The accomplishment of this catalog is thanks to recent major country-wide efforts like “Flora e Funga do Brasil”, and the task’s relevance is related to the possibility of informing continental-scale conservation efforts. We would like to thank all taxonomists which contributed to country level species checklists and floras and the respective coordinators, as well as the authors of the checklist of vascular plants of the Americas. Without their decades-long effort this work could not be possible.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1393241/full#supplementary-material

References

Anderberg, A., Baldwin, B. G., Bayer, R. G., Breitwieser, J., Jeffrey, C., Dillon, Mo, et al. (2007). ‘Compositae’. in The families and genera of vascular plants. Flowering plants. Eudicots. Asterales (Berlin) Vol. 8, 61–588.

Google Scholar

APG IV (2016). An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Botanical J. Linn. Soc. 181, 1–20.

Google Scholar

BFG (The Brazilian Flora Group) (2018). Brazilian flora 2020: innovation and collaboration to meet target 1 of the global strategy for plant conservation (GSPC). Rodrigesia 69, 1513–1527. doi: 10.1590/2175–7860201869402

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

BFG (The Brazilian Flora Group) (2022). Brazilian flora 2020 : leveraging the power of a collaborative scientific network. Taxon 71, 178–198. doi: 10.1002/tax.12640

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cabrera, A. L. (1978). “Compositae”. In Flora de la Provincia de Jujuy. Ed. Cabrera, A. L. (Buenos Aires, INTA).

Google Scholar

Cheek, M., Lughadha, E., Kirk, P., Lindon, H., Carretero, J., Looney, B., et al. (2020). New scientific discoveries: plants and fungi. Plants People Planet 2, 371–388. doi: 10.1002/ppp3.10148

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Colli-Silva, M., Vasconcelos, T.N.C., Pirani, J. (2019). Outstanding plant endemism levels strongly support the recognition of campo rupestre provinces in mountaintops of eastern South America. J. Biogeography 46, 1723–1733. doi: 10.1111/jbi.13585

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dillon, M. O., Cruz, M. E. Z., Silvestre, V. Q. (2021). Paranephelius (Asteraceae: Liabeae): A case study in high-elevation hybridization and taxonomic insights. J. Botanical Res. Institute Texas 15, 351–376. doi: 10.17348/jbrit.v15.i2.1154

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Funk, V. A., Susanna, A., Stuessy, T. F., Bayer, R. J. (2009). “Systematics, evolution, and biogeography of Compositae,” (International Association for Plant Taxonomy, Vienna).

Google Scholar

Grace, O. M., Pérez-Escobar, O. A., Lucas, E. J., Vorontsova, M. S., Lewis, G. P., Walker, B. E., et al. (2021). Botanical monography in the anthropocene. Trends Plant Sci. 26, 433–441. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2020.12.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gutiérrez, D. G., Scarpa, G., Rosso, C. N. (2020). Nuevas evidencias históricas del siglo XVIII sobre la presencia de “cardos” en Argentina y sus implicancias etnobotánicas. Bol. Soc Argent. Bot. 55, 299–314. doi: 10.31055/1851.2372.v55.n2.26407

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Habel, J. C., Gossner, M. M., Meyer, S. T., Lens, L. (2013). Mind the gaps when using science to address conservation concerns. Biodiversity Conserv. 22, 2413–2427. doi: 10.1007/s10531-013-0536-y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heiden, G., Antonelli, A., Pirani, J. P. (2019). A novel phylogenetic infrageneric classification of Baccharis (Asteraceae: Astereae), a highly diversified american genus. Taxon 68, 1048–1081. doi: 10.1002/tax.12128

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hortal, J., Bello, F. de, Diniz-Filho, JoséA. F., Lewinsohn, T. M., Lobo, J. M., Ladle, R. J. (2015). Seven shortfalls that beset large-scale knowledge of biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecology Evolution Systematics 46, 523–552. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054400

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Joppa, L. N., Roberts, D. L., Myers, N., Pimm, S. L. (2011). Biodiversity hotspots house most undiscovered plant species. PNAS 108, 13171–13176. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109389108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Katinas, L., Funk, V. A. (2020). An updated classification of the basal grade of Asteraceae (= Compositae): from Cabrera’s 1977 tribe Mutisieae to the present. New Z. J. Bot. 58, 67–93. doi: 10.1080/0028825X.2020.1718168

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Katinas, L., Gutiérrez, D., Grossi, M., Crisci, J. V. (2007). Panorama de la familia Asteraceae (=Compositae) en la Republica Argentina. Bol. Soc Argent. Bot. 42, 113–129.

Google Scholar

Lopez-Gallego, C., Morales-Morales, P. A., Castellanos-Castro, C., Salinas, N. R., Aguirre-Santoro, J., Aponte, A., et al (2024). Avances en la lista roja de las plantas de Colombia. Biota Colombiana 25, 1–25. doi: 10.21068/c001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Luebert, F., Moreira-Muñoz, A., Wilke, K., Dillon, M. O. (2017). Phylogeny and evolution of achenial trichomes in the Lucilia group (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae) and their systematic significance. Taxon 66 (5), 1184–1199.

Google Scholar

Mandel, J. R., Dikow, R. B., Siniscalchi, C. M., Thapa, R., Watson, L. E., Funk, V. A. (2019). A fully resolved backbone phylogeny reveals numerous dispersals and explosive diversifications throughout the history of Asteraceae. PNAS 116, 14083–14088. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1903871116

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mittermeier, R. A., Robles-Gil, P., Mittermeier, C. G. (1997). ‘Megadiversity: earth’s biologically wealthiest nations (Mexico DF: CEMEX/Agrupaciaon Sierra Madre).

Google Scholar

Monge, M., Kilian, N., Anderberg, A. A., Semir, J. (2016). Two new records of lactuca L. (Cichorieae, Asteraceae) in South America. Rev. Bras. Biociencias 14, 117–123.

Google Scholar

Moreira-Muñoz, A., Scherson, R. A., Luebert, F., Román, MaríaJosé, Monge, M., Diazgranados, M., et al. (2020). Biogeography, phylogenetic relationships and morphological analyses of the south american genus Mutisia L.f. (Asteraceae) shows early connections of two disjunct biodiversity hotspots. Organisms Diversity Evol. 20, 639–656. doi: 10.1007/s13127-020-00454-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nakajima, J. N., Junqueira, T. V., Freitas, AristônioS., Teles, F. M. (2012). Comparative analysis of red lists of the Brazilian flora: Asteraceae. Rodriguésia 63, 39–54. doi: 10.1590/S2175-78602012000100004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oliveira, E. ViníciusS., Alves, M. C., Landim, M. F., Gouveia, S. F. (2021). Sampling effort and the drivers of plant species richness in the Brazilian coastal regions. Oecologia 195, 163–171. doi: 10.1007/s00442-020-04805-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Palazzesi, L., Pellicer, J., Barreda, V. D., Loeuille, Benoît, Mandel, J. R., Pokorny, L., et al. (2022). Asteraceae as a model system for evolutionary studies: from fossils to genomes. Botanical J. Linn. Soc. 200, 143–164. doi: 10.1093/botlinnean/boac032

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Panero, J. L., Crozier, B. S. (2016). Macroevolutionary dynamics in the early diversification of Asteraceae. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 99, 116–132. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.03.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Parsley, K. M. (2020). Plant awareness disparity: A case for renaming plant blindness. Plants People Planet 2, 598–601. doi: 10.1002/ppp3.10153

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Roque, N., Teles, A. M., Nakajima, J. N. (2017). “A família Asteraceae no Brasil: classificação e diversidade,” (EDUFBA, Rio de Janeiro). doi: 10.7476/9788523219994

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Siniscalchi, C. M., Loeuille, B., Funk, V. A., Mandel, J. R., Pirani, JoséR. (2019). Phylogenomics yields new insight into relationships within Vernonieae (Asteraceae). Front. Plant Sci. 10. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01224

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sklenář, P., Romoleroux, K., Muriel, P., Jaramillo, R., Bernardi, A., Diazgranados, M., et al. (2021). Distribution changes in páramo plants from the equatorial high Andes in response to increasing temperature and humidity variation since 1880. Alpine Bot. 131, 201–212. doi: 10.1007/s00035–021-00270-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Susanna, A., Baldwin, B. G., Bayer, R. J., Bonifacino, J. M., Garcia-jacas, N., Keeley, S. C., et al. (2020). The classification of the Compositae: A tribute to Vicki Ann Funk, (1947–2019). Taxon 69, 807–814. doi: 10.1002/tax.12235

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

ter Steege, H., de Oliveira, S. M., Pitman, N. C.A., Sabatier, D., Antonelli, A., Guevara, J. E., et al. (2019). Towards a dynamic list of amazonian tree species. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–5. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40101-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ulloa Ulloa, C., Acevedo-Rodríguez, P., Beck, S., Belgrano, M. J., Bernal, R., Berry, P. E., et al. (2017). An integrated assessment of the vascular plant species of the Americas. Science 358, 1614–1617. doi: 10.1126/science.aao0398

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

United Nation’s Convention on Biological Diversity (2011) Updated global strategy for plant conservation 2011–2020. Available online at: https://www.cbd.int/gspc/ (Accessed 20 March 2024).

Google Scholar

Viviana, D., Palazzesi, L., Tellería, M. C., Olivero, E. B., Raine, J.I., et al. (2015). Early evolution of the angiosperm clade Asteraceae in the Cretaceous of Antarctica. PNAS 112, 10989–10994. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1423653112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zalles, V., Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Parker, D., Stehman, S. V., Pickens, A. H., et al. (2021). Rapid expansion of human impact on natural land in South America since 1985. Sci. Adv. 7, 1–12. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg1620

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, T., Elomaa, P. (2021). Don’t be fooled: false flowers in Asteraceae. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 59, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2020.09.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar