Pedro Valverde
Concepción Munoz Diez
Rustu Efe Deger
Diego Barranco2- 1Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
- 2Department of Agronomy (Excellence Unit ‘María de Maeztu’ 2020-23), ETSIAM, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
Olive breeding is a long process and any improvement in shortening the juvenile phase is highly desirable. In the present study, the effect of olive tree parents in different agronomic characteristics have been evaluated during four years in 520 olive genotypes generated from three different crosses in three different experimental fields, all located in Andalusia region, Spain. The crosses evaluated are ‘Arbosana’ x ‘Sikitita’ and its reciprocal, whose parents are characterized by being early bearers; and ‘Frantoio’ free pollinated, whose mother variety is characterized by having a long unproductive period. We studied plant height, distance and time to the first flowering, plant vigor and percentage of olive oil in the fruits. The findings reveal that progeny from ‘Arbosana’ and ‘Sikitita’ crosses, irrespective of the direction of the cross, exhibited a lower distance to flower, early bearing, reduced vigor and a lower percentage of olive oil in fruit compared to ‘Frantoio’ seedlings obtained from free pollination. Furthermore, no discernible differences were observed in the evaluated characteristics when comparing reciprocal crosses across the three fields in the four-years assessment period. Therefore, these results highlight the significance of planting height in reducing the evaluation period required in an olive breeding program and support the hypothesis that there is no maternal effect in the inheritance of the evaluated agronomic characteristics in olive trees.
1 Introduction
Olive tree was first domesticated between 6000-8000 years ago in Eastern Mediterranean (Besnard et al., 2013; Diez et al., 2015). Mediterranean Basin hosts more than 95% of the production and genetic variability of the olive tree (Rallo et al., 2018) and for years, producers have selected the most locally suitable cultivars which still reflect the current picture of global olive growing, characterized by a very large number of cultivars with very restricted distribution (Rallo et al., 2018). Despite the large genetic variability still present in the cultivated olive, only a few cultivars have low vigor and adapt to the requirements of the new super high-density olive orchards. Indeed, just few cultivars (‘Arbequina’, ‘Arbosana’, ‘Koroneiki’ and ‘Sikitita’) are being planted in super high-density, and ‘Arbequina’ is massively planted grown super high-density olive orchards worldwide (Centeno et al., 2019). Plant breeding can address this issue by generating new cultivars that combine suitability to high-density growing with other desired characteristics. Therefore, most olive breeding programs focus on increasing the number of cultivars adapted to these conditions and to guarantee the adaptability of new cultivars to emerging olive growing areas and new agronomical threats.
A significant challenge in olive breeding programs is the lengthy duration from the initial crosses to the release of a new variety. This is due to the necessity for olive seedlings to undergo a juvenile and unproductive phase before reaching the adult and productive phase, a process that can extend beyond 14 years, even up to 15 - 20 years (Fontanazza and Baldoni, 1990; Bellini et al., 2002). This characteristic poses a major impediment for breeding programs in olive and other perennials (Rallo, 1995; Rallo et al., 2018).
The development and optimization of techniques to shorten the JP are crucial to increase the efficiency of breeding and to release in a short time new cultivars adapted to new agronomical systems and environmental challenges. Transition in perennials is a progressive phenomenon that entails the presence of a juvenility cone (Hartmann et al., 2002). This is an overall spatial effect within the canopy, in which the upper and peripheral parts of the plant are adult, while the basal and inner parts remain juvenile (Hackett, 1985). As a result, juvenile tissues are localized within the cone-shaped area comprising the trunk and the bases of the lower branches. The existence of the juvenility cone in olive was first observed by Santos-Antunes et al. (2005), corroborated later by Moreno-Alías et al. (2010). The position of the first flower in seedlings has been studied as a marker of the end of the JP, and a juvenile cone has been confirmed in this species (Moreno-Alías et al., 2010; Suárez et al., 2011). The attainment of a certain plant height from the root to the apical meristem is required to flower. In this sense Suárez et al. (2011) reported significative differences in the distance values since root to the first flower among progenies At the same time, correlations with the length of the juvenile period such that early flowering genotypes required a lower minimum distance to the ground to overcome juvenility (De la Rosa et al., 2006).
Plant vigor and genetic inheritance highly affect the JP in olive (Rallo et al., 2008; Hammami et al., 2011; Moral et al., 2011; Moral et al., 2013). The duration of the JP shows an inverse relationship with plant vigor. Accordingly, environmental conditions that reduce vigorous growth, such as mineral deficiency, low light, water stress, defoliation or cold stress, tend to delay the transition from the juvenile to adult phase. In contrast, the conditions that allow for vigorous growth can shorten the period of juvenility (Nocker and Gardiner, 2014). Indeed, the shortening of JP in several fruit species may occur by forcing their growth under optimal conditions (Aldwinckle et al., 1976). This general approach was applied to olive and after years of optimization, the JP was reduced from ~ 15 to 2-4 years by forcing the growth of the seedlings in the greenhouse on continuous lightning, optimal temperature and fertigation (Santos-Antunes et al., 1999). Subsequently, the taller seedlings (> 160 cm) were planted in open fields under drip fertigation and the canopy was trained at 100-130 cm (Moreno-Alías et al., 2010). The duration of the JP in olive trees is linked to a crucial agronomic characteristic for new high-density plantations, known as early bearing (León et al., 2007). Therefore, by choosing plants with a short JP, we are also selecting potential early-bearing cultivars.
Some breeding studies are focused mainly on female genitor due to their so-called dominant heredity. In this sense, although it does not show itself in all areas and conditions, significant female influences were found in tree vigor and length of JP in olive seedlings (Lavee and Avidana, 2011; Moral et al., 2013). Female dominance also varies according to crossing conditions (controlled, self and open) and occurs more profoundly in tree vigor and canopy shape traits (Lavee and Avidana, 2011). Therefore, juvenile to adult transition height might correlate with the female dominance hypothesis. For instance, 50% of the early bearing variety ‘Arbequina’ seedlings flowered an average of 169 cm in length, while the transition occurred in ‘Manzanilla de Sevilla’ seedlings at 211 cm (Moral et al., 2013). Also, Moreno-Alías et al. (2010) determined that in open pollinated ‘Arbequina’ trees, the average minimum length from the trunk base to the first flowers to reach adult status was 200 cm. These results suggest that the transition height depends on the female genitor; therefore, certain critical plant height, a threshold, can be set for different varieties (Moral et al., 2013). However, no further studies have been carried out to confirm this hypothesis.
On the other hand, the possible differential effect of using a cultivar as mother or father in the length of the JP only has been tested using the reciprocal from ‘Manzanilla de Sevilla’ and ‘Arbequina’ crosses and the results suggest no significative differences depending on the direction of the cross (Suárez et al., 2011).
Assessing the existence of this effect and establishing specific flowering distance thresholds for selecting seedlings with short JP depending on their genitors would be crucial to increase the effectiveness of olive breeding programs. To address these two questions, we monitored the vigor, flowering time and flowering height of olive genotypes from different reciprocal crosses at different locations to infer specific flowering patterns and their environmental interactions.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Experimental design and plant material
The parental effect on juvenile to adult phase transition and its relation with agronomic characteristics were assessed in three experimental fields. All the trials were located in southern Spain: a) Rabanales Campus from University of Córdoba (UCO) (Córdoba),; b) Pedro Abad (Córdoba) and c) Almensilla (Sevilla) (Table 1).
Table 1 Climate and soil parameters in the three experimental fields.
The evaluated plants belonged to 3 crosses: ‘Arbosana’ x ‘Sikitita’, ‘Sikitita’ x ‘Arbosana’ and ‘Frantoio’ in open pollination. 520 seedlings were generated and evaluated. The parental selection was carried out based on the precocity and importance of the varieties. ‘Arbosana’ and ‘Sikitita’ are some of the few commercially available cultivars adapted to super high-density olive orchards and are characterized by earliness of bearing and low alternate bearing habits (Centeno et al., 2019). ‘Frantoio’ is a well-known Italian cultivar with high vigor and long unproductive period (Tombesi et al., 2011). Directed crosses using ‘Arbosana’ and ‘Sikitita’ olive cultivars were performed in the spring of 2010 and 2013 in trees of the International Olive Germplasm Bank of Cordoba (UCO Collection) according to a UCO optimized protocol by applying pollen (collect from the trees of the variety that will act as father) to bagged branches with flowers (in the tree that will be the mother in the directed crossing) (Valverde et al., 2021). Seed extraction and classification after removing the fruit flesh and pit were done in autumn after the harvest and seeds were disinfected with Tiram 50% and placed in Petri dishes containing wet perlite kept at 14°C for 30 days. A forced-growth protocol was followed after germination (Santos-Antunes et al., 2005). Seedlings were transplanted into 2.5 L pots and transferred to the greenhouse where drip fertigation, controlled temperature (24°C on average) and continuous lightning for 24 hours were provided. Seedlings were planted in the three fields with different heights (50-125 cm) and 4 m x 1.5 m spacing distributed in 4 blocks in each field (Table 2). All the experimental fields were cultivated following the standard practice of commercial orchards: annual irrigation was 2000 m3/ha applied by drip irrigation. Soil management included herbicide application under the trees and spontaneous vegetative cover between rows, controlled by soil cultivation. Pesticides and fungicides were applied when necessary, following a integrated pest and disease management principles.
Table 2 Number of seedlings from the different crosses planted in each experimental field.
2.2 Genotype evaluation
The trials were set up and evaluated in different years in each field according to the plantation year (Table 2). Seedlings were planted into the field in 2012, 2014 and 2015 in Pedro Abad (Córdoba province), Rabanales (Córdoba province) and Almensilla (Sevilla province), respectively. Evaluations were performed continuously for four years with an additional 5th year in Pedro Abad and Rabanales. Ontogeny of the plants (juvenile/adult stage), plant vigor and productivity and olive oil percentage were recorded as described:
2.2.1 Juvenile to adult transition
The number of flowering genotypes were assessed each May. First flowering distance was measured by adapting the method proposed by Moreno-Alías et al. (2010). The branches with flowers were identified and their distance to the ground was measured in 3 branches. The measurement was made first by taking the height of the trunk until the main branch on which the flower was found and then measuring the sub-branches until reaching the location of the flower (Trunk distance + Branch1 distance + Branch2 distance + Branchn distance = Dfl). The shortest distance from the ground to flower was selected for each genotype for the analysis. The time needed for JP to adult transition was given as monthly difference since germination.
2.2.2 Plant vigor
The planting height of the seedlings were taken along with the trunk diameter. Measurements were repeated once a year in the winter season to test the parental effect on vigor.
2.2.3 Olive oil percentage
In Rabanales experimental field, approximately 300 g of fruit were sampled in the version stage to assess oil quantity (Pardo et al., 2021). The sampling was carry out during 2016 to 2019 years in middle of November and all those plants that had fruit were sampled. The oil percentage was measured by an NMR analyzer Minispec NMS100 (Bruker Optik GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany) according to the protocol developed by Del Río and Romero (1999).
2.3 Statistical analysis
All the statistical analyses have been performed using the Statistix 10.0 software (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, Fl, USA). The following parameters were performed based on randomized block design with replications in each block: Time to first flower, genotypes in flowering by years, first flower distance, plant height year of first flower, plant height, trunk diameter and olive oil content. In all parameters, ANOVA was performed. Variance (ANOVA) analysis was applied and significant differences among means were compared using Fisher’s protected least significant difference (LSD) test (α = 0.05).
3 Results
3.1 Parental effect in the juvenile to adult transition
The first flowers were observed in ‘Arbosana’ x ‘Sikitita’ and its reciprocal cross one year after plantation in Almensilla. The second year after planting, genotypes from the reciprocal cross started to flower in all the experimental fields with no significative differences. Conversely, the seedlings of ‘Frantoio’ in open pollination only had genotypes with flowering in the Rabanales field after two years, with a significantly lower rate (Table 3). The time needed for the juvenile to adult transition phase in ‘Frantoio’ open pollination was mostly higher and progressed at a lower rate over time. Compared to other experimental fields, a significant portion of the trees in Rabanales reached the adult stage in 4 years, with 64.3% on average (Figure 1). There were no significative differences between reciprocal crosses with 77 and 70% of ‘Arbosana’ x ‘Sikitita’ and ‘Sikitita’ x ‘Arbosana’ seedlings with flowering (adult phase) after four years, whereas 45.8% of ‘Frantoio’ seedlings flowered in the same period. Significantly less flowering was observed in Pedro Abad and Almensilla than in Rabanales, 31% and 40.6%, respectively. The only exception was ‘Sikitita’ x ‘Arbosana’ in Almensilla, with 76.7% flowering in the same period. ‘Frantoio’ had the lowest number of adult seedlings in all experimental fields. No flowering was observed in ‘Frantoio’ open pollination in Almensilla, while in Pedro Abad it was only 11.1%. During all the years of evaluation, the percentage of flowering genotypes from the reciprocal cross ‘Arbosana’ x ‘Sikitita’ and ‘Sikitita’ x ‘Arbosana’ was higher than that obtained in the offspring of ‘Frantoio’ in open pollination in the three fields evaluated (Table 3). Regarding the planting height, in general the same result was obtained in the three experimental fields. The genotypes planted with less than 75 cm reached the adult phase, that is, they had flowering, later than the genotypes that had been planted with a greater height. The genotypes with more than 125 cm get the adult phase before than the rest of the genotypes (Figure 1). In the case of Pedro Abad and Almensilla, less than 20% of the genotypes that were planted with less than 75 cm flowered in 4 years of experiment. On the other hand, in Rabanales they reached 70% of genotypes flowering in 4 years (Figure 1).
Table 3 Genotypes flowering during the 6 years of evaluation in the three experimental field.
Figure 1 Percentage of genotypes in flowering during the years of evaluation in the three experimental fields depending on the planting height and crosses. The year 0 represents the plantation day.
3.2 First flowering distance and plant vigor
Reciprocal crosses differed from ‘Frantoio’ seedlings with a lower flowering distance with average values in Pedro Abad (266 cm), Rabanales (162 and 174 cm) and Almensilla (172 and 177 cm) against the obtained by ‘Frantoio’ with 294 cm in PedroAbad and 211 cm in Rabanales. The difference between ‘Arbosana’ x ‘Sikitita’ and ‘Sikitita’ x ‘Arbosana’ crosses was no significative (Table 4). Similarly, the plant height was always higher than the other crosses in ‘Frantoio’ seedlings. Regarding vigor, plant height and trunk diameter values have also been significantly higher in the offspring of the ‘Frantoio’ than in the rest of the crosses. In this sense, no significative parental effect was found when we compared the first flowering distances and vigor parameters (height and trunk diameter) in the reciprocal crosses in experimental sites and duration (Figure 2). Also, no significant differences were found among fields first flowering distance.
Table 4 Minimun, maximun, average first flower distance and average plant height in the three experimental field.
Figure 2 Distance since trunk base to first flower, height of the plants the year of the first flower, plant height and trunk diameter the last year of evaluation in the genotypes evaluated in the experimental field “Rabanales”.
3.3 Olive oil content
In parallel with the parameters evaluated previously, there were no significant differences in olive oil contents, both in fresh and dry weight, between ‘Arbosana’ x ‘Sikitita’ and ‘Sikitita’ x ‘Arbosana’ crosses, with average values of oil 19.0% and 19.2% fresh and 42.8% and 42.1% dry weight, respectively. On the other hand, the main differences were obtained when we compared the reciprocals with ‘Frantoio’ open pollination. Oil content was 23.1% and 48.2% fresh and dry weight on average (Figure 3).
Figure 3 Comparison of olive oil content in the three crosses in the Rabanales experimental field.
4 Discussion
Modern agriculture faces ongoing important challenges such as pests or diseases. The development of new varieties is essential not only to address existing problems but also to provide new characteristics demanded by consumers. Unlike annual crops, where breeding programs continually produce new varieties cutting-edge technologies and molecular breeding (Fujino et al., 2017; Guzmán et al., 2019; Cappetta et al., 2020; Merrick et al., 2022), most perennial fruit crops present a different scenario. While certain crops, such as peach (Nardino et al., 2022), plum (Castro et al., 2013) or apple (Teh et al., 2021), continually develop and implement new varieties, other crops such as pistachio (Sheikhi et al., 2019) or olive tree (Rallo et al., 2018) show a slower adoption of new varieties, mainly due to the deep-rooted use of conventional varieties (Marchese et al., 2016). Additionally, the long transition from the juvenile to the adult phase further extends the timeline for developing new varieties (Vargas et al., 2002; Rallo et al., 2018).
Specifically, in olive growing, a breeding program may take more than 14 years due to the long juvenility, and evaluation of agronomic traits such as productivity or olive oil quality can begin once the adult phase has passed (Rallo et al., 2018). Even in some cases, the unproductive period of the olive tree ranges from 15 to 20 years (Fontanazza and Baldoni, 1990). However, later studies demonstrate that an accurate selection of genitors and only planting genotypes with specific characteristics in the field can significantly reduce this unproductive period to less than 5 years (De la Rosa et al., 2006; Rallo et al., 2008; Moral et al., 2013; Valverde et al., 2023).
This study has evaluated the necessary time for pass from juvenile to adult in olive seedling during at least 4 years in three different fields in the south of Spain, exploring how the first flowering is affected by three olive progenies derived from parents with a short and long unproductive period and planting heights. Additionally, it has been evaluated the potential maternal or paternal influence on the inheritance of traits like vigor and oil content, comparing the reciprocal crosses ‘Sikitita’ x ‘Arbosana’ and ‘Arbosana’ x ‘Sikitita’ and the seedling from ‘Frantoio’ open pollinated.
As in previous works, it is corroborated that the short (‘Arbosana’ and ‘Sikitita’) or long (‘Frantoio’) unproductive period of the parents used in the crosses translates into a short or long JP of their seedlings (De la Rosa et al., 2006; León et al., 2007). As a result of planting seedlings shorter than 75 cm in the orchards, juvenile period was extended in the reciprocal crosses from ‘Arbosana’ and ‘Sikitita’. Still, some genotypes managed to produce flowers in the evaluation period, regardless of the planting height, due to the short unproductive time of the parents. ‘Frantoio’ is characterized by an extended juvenile period and high vigor. Our study reflects these traits, as there were no flowering seedlings in Almensilla over four years, despite variations in planting heights. It also seems possible to find an effective threshold to reduce juvenile phase of this cultivar when planting heights are increased in different varieties (Moral et al., 2013). Conversely, Moral et al. (2013) concluded that cultivar-specific height thresholds should be determined by considering the mother plant, Our results align partially with those obtained by Moral et al. (2013), where crosses made in 1998 and planted with less than 75 cm did not produce flowers after 5 years of evaluation due to the prolonged non-productive period of the parent plants, particularly evident in the case of ‘Frantoio’ in open pollination. This pattern was observed in our study in the Pedro Abad and Almensilla experimental fields with average values indicating that fewer than 20% of genotypes displayed flowering within the 4-year evaluation period.
The influence of planting height on juvenile to adult phase correlates with the vigor of the specific olive variety. In our study, a planting height of 100 cm was found effective in reducing juvenile period to 1 year in varieties with a low juvenile period such as ‘Arbosana’ and ‘Sikitita’ similarly to previous works (De la Rosa et al., 2006; León et al., 2007). Furthermore, from the second year after planting, flowering was observed in all crosses and experimental fields, although the percentages of genotypes flowering were growing progressively, except for open pollinated ‘Frantoio’ in Almensilla, whose genotypes did not flower during 4 years of evaluation. This observation highly contrasts with the 15 to 20 years necessary to reach the adult phase reported by Fontanazza and Baldoni in 1990, although progenies with a long unproductive period were evaluated in that case.
Certain genotypes flowered at around 100 centimeters, indicating the early bearing characteristics to each genotype. In this work, the mean distance of the first flowering has been evaluated and the values obtained have varied from 138 cm for ‘Sikitita’ x ‘Arbosana’ in Rabanales to 234 cm in the offsprings of ‘Frantoio’ in open pollination in Pedro Abad. Distance to first flower also varied between different experimental fields, for instance, ‘Arbosana’ x ‘Sikitita’, the distances were 141, 150, and 191 cm in Rabanales, Almensilla and Pedro Abad, respectively. Moreno-Alías et al. (2010) determined that 200 cm is the average distance for ‘Arbequina’ open pollination crosses, with values ranging from 157 cm to 260 cm. Approximately 100 cm variation is due to an unknown pollen source but also indicates parental effect. These values agree with those obtained in the present work with slight exceptions in data due to the different environmental conditions (Moreno-Alías et al., 2010; Suárez et al., 2011). Moreover, there were no significant different in the first flower distance across the 3 experimental sites, suggesting that this trait is mostly genetically influenced when given a similar management but different locations. The first flower distances were not significant among reciprocal crosses of ‘Arbosana’ and ‘Sikitita’, which corroborates with the results of Suárez et al. (2011) where no significative differences were found in the distance of the first flower of the reciprocal crosses from ‘Manzanilla de Sevilla’ and ‘Arbequina’ with the values 234 and 243 cm, respectively. Our results support the idea that both the mother and the father influence this trait equally and are equally important in selecting parents in breeding programs.
The non-significant differences in oil contents of reciprocal crosses also support the equal contribution of mother and father genitors. Furthermore, no specific maternal influence was found in the breeding study conducted by Valverde et al. (2021) with five different reciprocal hybrids against Verticillium wilt caused by Verticillium dahliae. Similar results have been previously reported in other crops, such as almond, blossom density, percentage of double kernels and kernel smoothness was not affected by reciprocal crosses. However, parental effect is still effective in some characteristics, such as kernel ratio or time of ripening, and suggests that the direction of crossing should be considered for the targeted parameters (Dicenta and Garcia, 1993). Although no parental effect was observed in various characteristics of olive tree investigated in this study, likely because these traits are under a polygenic control, thus in F1 progenies is not possible to detect their segregation, further research is needed to determine their influence on other important traits such as disease and pest resistance and olive oil quality parameters.
We have demonstrated that first flower distance in olive is predominantly influenced by genetic factors, making it a stable and comparable selection trait in breeding programs, provided an adequate farm management. This trait holds significant importance in the selection of early-bearing genotypes, which is currently a key trait not only in olive growing but also in the context of any perennial crop.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
PV: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. CM: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. RD: Data curation, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft. DB: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. CT: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The authors declare that this study received funding from the University of Cordoba and Marche Polytechnic University.
Acknowledgments
The authors want to thank all the farmers and companies that have collaborated in this work. This work has been partially financed by the Unit of Excellence María de Maetzu, Department of Agronomy (DAUCO), University of Córdoba and collaborating companies Todolivo, S.L. and Santacruz Ingeniería S.L. We also thanks the collaborating companies for the field management.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Aldwinckle, H. S., Gustafson, H. L., Lamb, R. C. (1976). Early determination of genotypes for apple scab resistance by forced flowering of test cross progenies. Euphytica. 25, 185–191. doi: 10.1007/BF00041544
Bellini, E., Giordani, E., Parlati, M. V., Pandolfi, S., Perri, E. (2002). Olive genetic improvement: Variability within the progeny 'Picholine' x 'Grossanne'. Proceding Fourth Int. Symposium Olive Growing vols 1 2. Acta Hortic. 586, 183–186. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.586.32
Besnard, G., Khadari, B., Navascués, M., Fernández-Mazuecos, M., El Bakkali, A., Arrigo, N., et al. (2013). The complex history of the olive tree: From late quaternary diversification of Mediterranean lineages to primary domestication in the northern Levant. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 280 (1756). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2833
Cappetta, E., Andolfo, G., Di Matteo, A., Barone, A., Frusciante, L., Ercolano, M. R. (2020). Accelerating tomato breeding by exploiting genomic selection approaches. Plants 9, 1236. doi: 10.3390/plants9091236
Castro, S., DeBuse, C. J., DeJong, T. M. (2013). The University of California Prunus domestica cultivar development program. Acta Hortic. 985, 77–82. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.985.9
Centeno, A., Hueso, A., Gómez-del-Campo, M. (2019). Long-term evaluation of growth and production of olive cultivars in super high-density orchard under cold-weather conditions. Scientia Hortic. 257, 108657. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108657
De La Rosa, R., Kiran, A. I., Barranco, D., León, L. (2006). Seedling vigour as a preselection criterion for short juvenile period in olive breeding. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 57, 477–481. doi: 10.1071/AR05219
Del Río, C., Romero, A. M. (1999). Whole, unmilled olives can be used to determine their oil content by nuclear magnetic resonance. Horttechnology. 9 (4), 675–680. doi: 10.21273/horttech.9.4.675
Dicenta, F., Garcia, J. E. (1993). Reciprocal crosses in almond. Plant Breed. 110 (1), 77–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1993.tb00571.x
Diez, C. M., Trujillo, I., Martinez-Urdiroz, N., Barranco, D., Rallo, L., Marfil, P., et al. (2015). Olive domestication and diversification in the Mediterranean Basin. New Phytologist. 206 (1), 436–447. doi: 10.1111/nph.13181
Fontanazza, G., Baldoni, L. (1990). Proposed programme for the genetic improvement of the olive. Olivae 34, 32–41.
Fujino, K., Nishimura, T., Kiuchi, H., Hirayama, Y., Sato, T. (2017). Phenotypic changes during 100-year rice breeding programs in Hokkaido. Breed. Sci. 67 (5), 528–534. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.17071
Guzmán, C., Ammar, K., Govindan, V., Singh, R. (2019). Genetic improvement of wheat grain quality at CIMMYT. Front. Agric. Sci. Eng. 6 (3), 265‒272. doi: 10.15302/J-FASE-2019260
Hackett, W. P. (1985). Juvenility, maturation and rejuvenation in woodyplants. Horticultural Review. 7, 109–155. doi: 10.1002/9781118060735.ch3
Hammami, S. B. M., León, L., Rapoport, H. F., de la Rosa, R. (2011). Early growth habit and vigour parameters in olive seedlings. Scientia Hortic. 129 (4), 761–768. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.05.038
Hartmann, H. T., Kester, D. E., Davies, J. F. T., Geneve, R. L. (2002). Plant propagation principles and practices. 7th (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, NJ).
Lavee, S., Avidana, B. (2011). Heredity diversity in populations of free-, self-, and specific cross-pollinated progenies of some olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 59 (1), 29–37. doi: 10.1560/IJPS.59.1.29
León, L., de la Rosa, R., Barranco, D., Rallo, L. (2007). Breeding for early bearing in olive. HortScience. 43 (3), 499–502. doi: 10.21273/hortsci.42.3.499
Marchese, A., Marra, F. P., Caruso, T., Mhelembe, K., Costa, F., Fretto, S., et al. (2016). The first high-density sequence characterized SNP-based linkage map of olive (Olea europaea L. subsp. europaea) developed using genotyping by sequencing. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 10 (6), 857–863. doi: 10.21475/ajcs.2016.10.06.p7520
Merrick, L. F., Herr, A. W., Sandhu, K. S., Lozada, D. N., Carter, A. H. (2022). Optimizing plant breeding programs for genomic selection. Agronomy 12, 714. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12030714
Moral, J., Barranco, D., Muñoz-Díez, C., Rallo, L., León, L., de la Rosa, R. (2011). Earliness of bearing in olive progenies. Acta Horticulturae. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2011.924.43
Moral, J., Díez, C. M., León, L., de la Rosa, R., Santos-Antunes, F., Barranco, D., et al. (2013). Female genitor effect on the juvenile period of olive seedlings. Scientia Horticulturae. 156, 99–105. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2013.03.025
Moreno-Alías, I., Rapoport, H. F., León, L., de la Rosa, R. (2010). Olive seedling first-flowering position and management. Scientia Horticulturae. 124 (1), 74–77. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.12.018
Nardino, M., Rodrigues, E., do Carmo, M., Moreira, I., Silva, W., Cezar, R. (2022). Genetic progress over 53 years of the peach breeding program of Embrapa: canning genotypes. Euphytica 218, 33. doi: 10.1007/s10681-022-02984-3
Nocker, S., Gardiner, S. E. (2014). Breeding better cultivars, faster: Applications of new technologies for the rapid deployment of superior horticultural tree crops. Horticulture Res. 1, 14022. doi: 10.1038/hortres.2014.22
Pardo, J. E., Rabadán, A., Suárez, M., Tello, J., Zied, D. C., Álvarez-Ortí, M. (2021). Influence of olive maturity and season on the quality of virgin olive oils from the area assigned to the protected designation of origin of "Aceite de la Alcarria" (Spain). Agronomy 11 (7), 1439. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11071439
Rallo, L., Barranco, D., Díez, C. M., Rallo, P., Suárez, M. P., Trapero, C., et al. (2018). Strategies for olive (Olea europaea L.) breeding: Cultivated genetic resources and crossbreeding. Adv. Plant Breed. Strategies: Fruits. 535–600. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-91944-7_14
Rallo, P., Jiménez, R., Ordovás, J., Suárez, M. P. (2008). Possible early selection of short juvenile period olive plants based on seedling traits. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 59 (10), 933–940. doi: 10.1071/AR08013
Santos-Antunes, F., Léon, L., de la Rosa, R., Alvarado, J., Mohedo, A., Trujillo, I., et al. (2005). The length of the juvenile period in olive as influenced by vigor of the seedlings and the precocity of the parents. HortScience. 40(5), 1213–1215. doi: 10.21273/hortsci.40.5.1213
Santos-Antunes, A. F., Mohedo, A., Trujillo, I., Rallo, L. (1999). Influence of the genitors on the flowering of olive seedlings under forced growth. Acta Horticulturae. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.1999.474.17
Sheikhi, A., Arab, M. M., Brown, P. J., Ferguson, L., Akbari, M. (2019). “Pistachio (Pistacia spp.) breeding,” in Advances in plant breeding strategies: nut and beverage crops. Eds. Al-Khayri, J., Jain, S., Johnson, D. (Cham: Springer). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-23112-5_10
Suárez, M. P., Casanova, L., Jiménez, R., Morales-Sillero, A., Ordovás, J., Rallo, P. (2011). Variability of first flower to ground distance in olive seedlings and its relationship with the length of the juvenile period and the parent genotype. Scientia Horticulturae. 129 (4), 747–751. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.05.033
Teh, S. L., Kostick, S. A., Evans, K. M. (2021). “Genetics and breeding of apple scions,” in The apple genome. Compendium of plant genomes. Ed. Korban, S. S. (Cham: Springer). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-74682-7_5
Tombesi, A., Proietti, P., Iacobelli, G., Tombesi, S., Farinelli, D., Tous, J., et al. (2011). Vegetative and productive behaviour of four olive Italian cultivars and ‘Arbequina’ According to super intensive olive training system in Central Italy. Acta Hortic. 924, 211–218. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.924.26
Valverde, P., Barranco, D., López-Escudero, F. J., Díez, C. M., Trapero, C. (2023). Efficiency of breeding olives for resistance to Verticillium wilt. Front. Plant Sci. 14. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1149570
Valverde, P., Trapero, C., Barranco, D., López-Escudero, F. J., Gordom, A., Diez, C. M. (2021). Assessment of maternal effect and genetic variability in resistance to verticillium dahliae in olive progenies. Plants 10 (8). doi: 10.3390/plants10081534
Keywords: breeding, distance to first flower, field, juvenile period, olive oil, reciprocal crosses, vigor
Citation: Valverde P, Diez CM, Deger RE, Barranco D and Trapero C (2024) Genotypic influence in the juvenile to adult transition in olive seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 15:1343589. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1343589
Received: 23 November 2023; Accepted: 17 January 2024;
Published: 06 February 2024.
Edited by:
Franco Famiani, University of Perugia, ItalyReviewed by:
Samanta Zelasco, Council for Agricultural and Economics Research (CREA), ItalyAnnalisa Marchese, University of Palermo, Italy
Copyright © 2024 Valverde, Diez, Deger, Barranco and Trapero. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Pedro Valverde, cC52YWx2ZXJkZUBzdGFmZi51bml2cG0uaXQ=; cGVkcm92YWx2ZXJkZUB1Y28uZXM=