Shubhpriya Gupta
Paromik Bhattacharyya
Manoj G. Kulkarni
Karel Doležal- 1Laboratory of Growth Regulators, Faculty of Science, Palacký University & Institute of Experimental Botany Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (AS CR), Olomouc, Czechia
- 2Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu Natal Pietermaritzburg, Scottsville, South Africa
- 3Biotechnology Division, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Palampur, India
- 4Department of Chemical Biology, Faculty of Science, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czechia
Editorial on the Research Topic
Growth regulators and biostimulants: upcoming opportunities
Plant growth regulators (PGR) and biostimulants are known to regulate plant growth and development, boost plant metabolism, and enhance nutrient uptake, resulting in healthier plants with better yields. However, their mode of action to promote plant growth is different. Plant growth regulators are defined as synthetic compounds, phytohormone derivatives such as [e.g., 2, 4-Dichlorophenoxy Acetic acid), alpha-Naphthalene Acetic Acid, 6-benzylaminopurine, thidiazuron and 6-furfurylaminopurine or kinetin] that mimic naturally occurring plant hormones [e.g., indole-3-acetic acid, trans-Zeatin, cis-zeatin, dihydrozeatin DZ, isopentenyladenine] (Gianfagna, 1995; Scacchi et al., 2009; Gupta and Chaturvedi, 2022). Growth regulators do not hold nutritive value and function by either suppressing or boosting plant growth and development by directly influencing plant hormones at low doses (Rademacher, 2015). On the other hand, biostimulants usually are complex mixtures containing organic (example, extracts of seaweed, vermicompost leachate, protein hydrolysates, humic substances, smoke-water), microbial (fungi and bacteria) and/or inorganic (Si, Se) (Brown and Saa, 2015; Colla and Rouphael, 2015; Du Jardin, 2015; Gupta et al., 2021; Shahrajabian et al., 2023) constituents. They enhance plant growth and health by stimulating natural processes at a minute quantity rather than directly controlling plant growth (Rouphael and Colla, 2018; EBIC, 2020).
Plant growth regulators are required in low quantities and have fewer impurities than conventional fertilizers. Furthermore, biostimulants are derived from natural resources (Gupta and Van Staden, 2021). Therefore, there is a minimal risk regarding toxicity and safety to humans and the environment (Kisvarga et al., 2022). Growth regulators and biostimulants are becoming increasingly popular among farmers and consumers worldwide because they can help increase yields and improve soil health with low dependence on synthetic fertilizers and pesticides. There is a paradigm shift around the world post COVID-19 and an increase in demand for organic food among consumers as a preventive health measure both from developed and developing countries (Ćirić et al., 2020; Śmiglak-Krajewska and Wojciechowska-Solis, 2021; Brata et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2022). With a growing global population and increasing concerns about environmental degradation there is a growing demand for sustainable agriculture practices and the adoption of GLOBALGAP (GLOBAL Good Agricultural Practices) policies (Kleemann et al., 2014; Mook and Overdevest, 2021). Furthermore, the market for growth regulators and biostimulants is expected to grow and expand into new areas, including Asia and Africa (Markets and Markets, 2022; Markets and Markets, 2023). Growth regulators and biostimulants are likely to become more significant in agriculture over the next few years due to technological advancements and growing demand for sustainable agriculture.
In 2022, PGR and biostimulants market was valued at circa (i.e., approx., ca.) USD 2.9 billion and ca. USD 3.5 billion respectively (Markets and Markets, 2022; Markets and Markets, 2023). For PGR, it is projected to reach ca. USD 4.5 billion with a CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) of 7.4% by 2028 (Markets and Markets, 2023) and ca. USD 6.2 billion and 11.8% for biostimulants by 2027 (Markets and Markets, 2022). Therefore, both small and big companies like, Isagro (Italy), Arysta (Japan), BASF (Germany), Syngenta (Switzerland), Bio AG Alliance (US), FMC Corporation (US), Valagro (Italy), Kelpak (South Africa), Biolchim (Italy), Acadian (Canada), Koppert (Netherlands), Biostadt (India), Italpollina (Italy) and many more are pushing into growth regulators and biostimulants and are significantly investing in research (Corsi et al., 2022, Markets and Markets, 2022; Critchley et al., 2021; Moyo et al., 2021). With the growing popularity of growth regulators and biostimulants, many countries are developing regulations to ensure the safety and effectiveness of these products (Du Jardin, 2015; García-Sánchez et al., 2022). Furthermore, as regulatory frameworks advance, there will be opportunities for PGR and biostimulants companies to develop innovative products that satisfy regulatory requirements and fulfill the needs of farmers (Caradonia et al., 2019; Norrie et al., 2021).
Recent technological developments have enabled more efficient growth regulators and biostimulants to be developed. For example, the application of nanotechnology can enhance the efficacy and delivery of these products suggesting that growth regulators and biostimulants will become more significant in agribusiness in the coming years. The research papers in the focus Research Topic on “Growth Regulators and Biostimulants: Upcoming Opportunities” highlight the importance of growth regulators and biostimulants in agriculture and their role in improving crop yield in sustainably under biotic and abiotic stress. In this Research Topic, Rathore and Kumar studied the dynamics of phosphorus and biostimulants [Amino Booster G (the amino acid solution) and V-Hume (the humic acid solution)] on the agro-morphological traits, essential oil yield, and chemical constituents of German chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla). They found that the amino acid and humic acid solution positively affects plant growth, flower yield, and essential oil composition. Li et al. discovered that exogenous application of trehalose to maize (Zea mays) generated more significant carbon and nitrogen metabolic activity, increased chlorophyll content, and enhanced dry matter accumulation in roots and shoots as compared to the effect of chitosan, humic acid and gamma-aminobutyric acid. Parmar et al. reviewed the metabolites produced by microalgae biostimulants and their effects on plant growth, productivity, and tolerance against stressors, as well as different modes of application of microalgae metabolites. Furthermore, the authors emphasized the circular economy model of microalgae-mediated bioremediation coupled with biorefinery approaches for generating high-value metabolites and enhancing the sustainability of microalgae biomass production. Mohammed et al. demonstrated that the seed presoaking and irrigation of broad bean (Vicia faba) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus) with Sargassum polycystum aqueous extract improved the germination, growth and antioxidant activity of plants. Raj et al. discovered that biostimulants like vermicompost, biofertilizer, and liquid seaweed extract enhanced basil (Ocimum basilicum) yield and quality without using harmful agrochemicals.
Wang et al. explained the molecular mechanisms of melatonin and its function in promoting adventitious root formation in cucumber (Cucumis sativus) seedlings grown under shade. The authors found that melatonin significantly increased adventitious root formation in the cucumber hypocotyl by controlling the expression of genes involved in hormone synthesis, signaling, and cell wall biogenesis, as well as by raising levels of auxin, cytokinin, jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, and abscisic acid.
Plant growth regulators can be used to alleviate the detrimental effects of biotic and abiotic stress and improve crop yield and quality. Singh et al. showed that various hormones (such as ABA, cytokinin, GA, and IAA) differently control flowering in saffron by regulating floral integrator [FT (FLOWERING LOCUS T) and LFY (LEAFY)], repressor [SVP (SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE) and TFL1-2 (TERMINAL FLOWER1)] genes, and homeotic [PISTILLATA, SEPETALLA, and DL (DROPPING LEAF)] gene expression. Otari et al. found that MS medium fortified with 2.0 mg/l BAP + KIN and 0.5 mg/l IAA + IBA + NAA produced the best shoot and root development results, respectively, in Indian Pennywort (Bacopa floribunda). The role of cytokinin in defense or stress priming and the maintenance of photosynthesis was meticulously reviewed by Hudeček et al.. Debnath and Ghosh reviewed in-depth study on the phenotypic variation in micropropagated berry plants and the role of DNA methylation in these variations. Pandey et al. showed that foliar spray or seed soaking treatment of a novel natural plant growth enhancer, “calliterpenone,” (a phyllocladane diterpenoid) isolated from Callicarpa macrophylla enhanced crop productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum), rice (Oryza sativa) potato (Solanum tuberosum), chickpea (Cicer arietinum), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), and onion (Allium cepa).
In this Research Topic, the study by Zhang et al. found that Ca2+-treated pears can suppress the production of stone cells which affects pear quality, and provided insight into its molecular mechanism. Liu et al. discovered that among carbon dioxide, ethylene, nitrogen, and wounding, carbon dioxide treatment was the best to induce the formation of heartwood in 6-year-old Indian sandalwood (Santalum album) trees.
Kaushal et al. reviewed the molecular pathways activated by microbial biostimulants (plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, PGPR) in plants facing abiotic and biotic stress. Morcillo et al. reviewed the effect of cell-free microbial culture filtrates on beneficial soil microbes, plant growth promotion and in combating stress tolerance. Ali et al. reported that the application of stress-tolerant Bacillus sp. improved the length of shoots, roots, and number of roots in saffron (Crocus sativus). del-Canto et al. showed that the inoculation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) with drought and salinity-tolerant indigenous rhizobium strains improved drought tolerance and yield compared to nitrogen fertilization.
Plant growth regulators and biostimulants have great potential to improve agricultural yield, making them a great option for farmers and growers looking to increase productivity and profitability in a sustainable manner. The use of plant growth regulators and biostimulants can help reduce the environmental impact of chemical fertilizers by increasing nutrient uptake, improving soil health and fertilizer management practices. With advancements in technology and growing demand for sustainable agriculture, there are numerous opportunities for PGR and biostimulants. For example, precision agriculture techniques can be used to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of PGR and biostimulants. These techniques can aid in boosting crop quality and yield. In addition, the use of biostimulants and PGR is spreading beyond conventional crops like grains and vegetables to include ornamental, medicinal, and fruit-producing plants. Plant growth regulators and biostimulants will likely play a crucial role in improving the productivity of crops and minimizing environmental impact by prioritizing sustainable agricultural practices.
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful for support from the Palacký University, Czech Republic; Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports, Czech Republic via the European Regional Development Fund-Project “Plants as a tool for sustainable global development” (CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000827), National Research Foundation, South Africa, (grant number- CSRP2204041882 and 145740) and CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, India. Finally, we are thankful to the authors, editors, and reviewers for their efforts and contributions to this Research Topic.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Śmiglak-Krajewska, M., Wojciechowska-Solis, J. (2021). Consumer versus organic products in the COVID-19 pandemic: opportunities and barriers to market development. Energies 14, 5566. doi: 10.3390/en14175566
Brata, A. M., Chereji, A. I., Brata, V. D., Morna, A. A., Tirpe, O. P., Popa, A., et al. (2022). Consumers’ perception towards organic products before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a case study in bihor county, Romania. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19, 12712. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912712
Brown, P., Saa, S. (2015). Biostimulants in agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 6. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00671
Caradonia, F., Battaglia, V., Righi, L., Pascali, G., La Torre, A. (2019). Plant biostimulant regulatory framework: prospects in Europe and current situation at international level. J. Plant Growth Regul. 38, 438–448. doi: 10.1007/s00344-018-9853-4
Ćirić, M. R., Ilić, D. S., Ignjatijević, S. D., Brkanlić, S. D. (2020). Consumer behaviour in online shopping organic food during the COVID-19 pandemic in Serbia. Food Feed. Res. 47, 149–158. doi: 10.5937/ffr47-28815
Colla, G., Rouphael, Y. (2015). Biostimulants in horticulture. Sci. Hortic. 196, 1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.10.044
Corsi, S., Ruggeri, G., Zamboni, A., Bhakti, P., Espen, L., Ferrante, A., et al. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of the scientific literature on biostimulants. Agronomy 12, 1257. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12061257
Critchley, A. T., Critchley, J. S. C., Norrie, J., Gupta, S., Van Staden, J. (2021). “Perspectives on the global biostimulant market: applications, volumes, and values 2016 Data and projections to 2022,” in Biostimulants for crops from seed germination to plant development- a practical approach. Eds. Gupta, S., Van Staden, J. (Amsterdam: Academic Press), 289–296.
Du Jardin, P. (2015). Plant biostimulants: defnition, concept, main categories and regulation. Sci. Hortic. 196, 3–1. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.021
García-Sánchez, F., Simón-Grao, S., Navarro-Pérez, V., Alfosea-Simón, M. (2022). Scientific advances in biostimulation reported in the 5th biostimulant world congress. Horticulturae 8, 665. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae8070665
Gianfagna, T. (1995). “Natural and synthetic growth regulators and their use in horticultural and agronomic crops,” in Plant hormones. Ed. Davies, P. J. (Dordrecht: Springer). doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-0473-9_34
Gupta, S., Chaturvedi, P. (2022). Commercial scale tissue culture for horticulture and plantation crops (Springer Nature Singapore). doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-0055-6
Gupta, S., Kulkarni, M. G., White, J. F., Stirk, W. A., Papenfus, H. B., Doležal, K., et al. (2021). “Categories of various plant biostimulants–mode of application and shelflife,” in Biostimulants for crops from seed germination to plant development–a practical approach. Eds. Gupta, S., Van Staden, J. (Amsterdam: Academic Press), 1–60.
Gupta, S., Van Staden, J. (2021). Biostimulants for crops from seed germination to plant development- a practical approach (Amsterdam:Academic Press). doi: 10.1016/C2019-0-05281-8
Kisvarga, S., Farkas, D., Boronkay, G., Neményi, A., Orlóci, L. (2022). Effects of biostimulants in horticulture, with emphasis on ornamental plant production. Agronomy 12, 1043. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12051043
Kleemann, L., Abdulai, A., Buss, M. (2014). Certification and access to export markets: adoption and return on investment of organic-certified pineapple farming in Ghana. World Dev. 64, 79–92. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.05.005
Markets and Markets (2022). Biostimulants market - global forecast to 2027. Markets and Markets (2012). Biostimulants market - global forecast to 2027.
Markets and Markets (2023). Plant growth regulators- market - global forecast to 2028 (Pune, India.:Markets and Markets™Research Private Ltd.).
Mook, A., Overdevest, C. (2021). What drives market construction for fair trade, organic, and GlobalGAP certification in the global citrus value chain? evidence at the importer level in the Netherlands and the united states. Bus. Strat. Environ. 30, 2996–3008. doi: 10.1002/bse.2784
Moyo, M., Aremu, A. O., Amoo, S. O., Gupta, S., Van Staden, J. (2021). “Potential of seaweed extracts and humate-containing biostimulants in mitigating abiotic stress in plants,” in Biostimulants for crops from seed germination to plant development- a practical approach (Amsterdam:Academic Press), 297–332.
Norrie, J., Critchley, A. T., Gupta, S., Van Staden, J., Gupta, S., Van Staden, J. (2021). “Biostimulants in modern agriculture: fitting round biological effects into square regulatory holes,” in Biostimulants for crops from seed germination to plant development- a practical approach (Academic Press), 231–236.
Rademacher, W. (2015). Plant growth regulators: backgrounds and uses in plant production. J. Plant Growth Regul. 34, 845–872. doi: 10.1007/s00344-015-9541-6
Rouphael, Y., Colla, G. (2018). Synergistic biostimulatory action: designing the next generation of plant biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1e24. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01655
Scacchi, E., Osmont, K. S., Beuchat, J., Salinas, P., Navarrete-Gómez, M., Trigueros, M., et al. (2009). Dynamic auxin-responsive plasma membrane-to-nucleus movement of arabidopsis BRX. Development 136, 2059–2067. doi: 10.1242/dev.035444
Shahrajabian, M. H., Petropoulos, S. A., Sun, W. (2023). Survey of the influences of microbial biostimulants on horticultural crops: case studies and successful paradigms. Horticulturae 9, 193. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae9020193
The European Biostimulants Industry Council (EBIC) (2020). Available at: https://biostimulants.eu (Accessed 21 march 2022).
Keywords: plant growth regulators, biostimulants, soil health, organic, sustainable agriculture, crop productivity
Citation: Gupta S, Bhattacharyya P, Kulkarni MG and Doležal K (2023) Editorial: Growth regulators and biostimulants: upcoming opportunities. Front. Plant Sci. 14:1209499. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1209499
Received: 20 April 2023; Accepted: 02 May 2023;
Published: 26 May 2023.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Anna N. Stepanova, North Carolina State University, United StatesCopyright © 2023 Gupta, Bhattacharyya, Kulkarni and Doležal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Shubhpriya Gupta, c2h1Ymhwcml5YTA1QGdtYWlsLmNvbQ==; Paromik Bhattacharyya, cGFyb21pazYwMEBnbWFpbC5jb20=