Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Plant Sci., 17 February 2023
Sec. Technical Advances in Plant Science
Volume 14 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1121759

Corrigendum: Genetic diversity assessment of Hopea hainanensis in Hainan Island

This article is a correction to:

  1. Genetic diversity assessment of Hopea hainanensis in Hainan Island

    1. Read original article
Yukai Chen&#x;Yukai Chen1†Hai-Li Zhang&#x;Hai-Li Zhang2†Li Zhang*Li Zhang3*Mir Muhammad Nizamani*Mir Muhammad Nizamani4*Taoxiu ZhouTaoxiu Zhou5Haiyang ZhangHaiyang Zhang6Tingting LiuTingting Liu3
  • 1Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Ecology of Tropical Islands, College of Life Sciences, Hainan Normal University, Haikou, China
  • 2Hainan Key Laboratory for Sustainable Utilization of Tropical Bioresources, School of Life Sciences, Hainan University, Haikou, China
  • 3Guizhou Normal University Museum, Guizhou Normal University, Guizhou, China
  • 4Department of Plant Pathology, Agricultural College, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China
  • 5College of Biological Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
  • 6College of International Studies, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

A Corrigendum on
Genetic diversity assessment of Hopea hainanensis in Hainan Island

by Chen Y, Zhang H-L, Zhang L, Nizamani MM, Zhou T, Zhang H and Liu T (2022) Front. Plant Sci. 13:1075102. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1075102

In the published article, there was an error in Abstract, paragraph one.

This sentence previously stated:

“The results showed that the average heterozygosity of the six populations of Hopea hainanensis was 19.77%, which indicated that the genetic diversity of Hopea hainanensis was low.”

The corrected sentence appears below:

“The results showed that the average heterozygosity of the seven populations of Hopea hainanensis was 19.77%, which indicated that the genetic diversity of Hopea hainanensis was low.”

In the published article, there was an error in 1. Introduction, paragraph four.

This sentence previously stated:

“It was identified as endangered species in the Red Book of Chinese Plants. The ramps as “Endangered” by the IUCN (Ly et al., 2018).”

The corrected sentence appears below:

“It was identified as an endangered species in the Red Book of Chinese Plants and is ranked as “Endangered” by the IUCN (Ly et al., 2018)”.

In the published article, there was an error in 1. Introduction, paragraph five.

This sentence previously stated:

“The construction and analysis of genetic maps, the study of genome-wide association systems and gene diversity and identifying the germplasm of plants and animals. Therefore, in this study, P-GBS technology was used to systematically identify 42 genome-wide SNPs of H. hainanensis resources.”,

The corrected sentence appears below:

“These include the construction and analysis of genetic maps, the study of genome-wide association systems and gene diversity, and identifying the germplasm of plants and animals. Therefore, in this study, GBS technology was used to systematically identify 42 genome-wide SNPs of H. hainanensis resources. “.

In the published article, there was an error in 3. Results, 3.3. Genetic evolution and population analysis, 3.3.3 Principal component analysis.

The sentence below should be removed:

“PC1、PC2、PC3 分PC1, PC2, and PC3 represent principal component 1, principal component 2, and principal component 3, respectively”.

In the published article, there was an error in 4. Discussion, 4.1 Genetic diversity in Hopea hainanensis, paragraph two.

The sentence below should be removed:

“In PCA, the contribution rates of the PC1, PC2, and PC3 were 28.78%, 11.2%, and 6.29%, respectively. The contribution rates of the three principal components selected in this analysis were all low. The total contribution rate is less than 50%, so the results of the PCA cluster may be biased from those of other groups.”

The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: conservation biology, endangered tree, hopea hainanensis, SNP, GBS

Citation: Chen Y, Zhang H-L, Zhang L, Nizamani MM, Zhou T, Zhang H and Liu T (2023) Corrigendum: Genetic diversity assessment of Hopea hainanensis in Hainan Island. Front. Plant Sci. 14:1121759. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1121759

Received: 12 December 2022; Accepted: 06 February 2023;
Published: 17 February 2023.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Mehedi Masud, Taif University, Saudi Arabia

Copyright © 2023 Chen, Zhang, Zhang, Nizamani, Zhou, Zhang and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Li Zhang, ODEwMjE3NzYxQHFxLmNvbQ==; Mir Muhammad Nizamani, bWlybW9oYW1tYWRuaXphbWFuaUBvdXRsb29rLmNvbQ==

†These authors share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.