ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 18 October 2022

Sec. Plant Abiotic Stress

Volume 13 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.968774

Epichloƫ endophytes improved Leymus chinensis tolerance to both neutral and alkali salt stresses

  • 1. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China

  • 2. College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China

Abstract

Symbiotic relationships with microbes may influence how plants respond to environmental change. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that symbiosis with the endophytes promoted salt tolerance of the native grass. In the field pot experiment we compared the performance of endophyte-infected (E+) and endophyte-uninfected (Eāˆ’) Leymus chinensis, a dominant species native to the Inner Mongolia steppe, under altered neutral and alkaline salt stresses. The results showed that under both neutral and alkaline salt stresses, endophyte infection significantly increased plant height, leaf length and fibrous root biomass. Under neutral salt stress, endophyte infection decreased Na+ content and Na+/K+ ratio (p=0.066) in the leaf sheath while increased Ca2+ and Mg2+ content in the rhizome. Under alkali salt stress, endophyte infection tended to increase K+ content in the fibrous root, enhance Mg2+ content in the fibrous root while reduce Na+/K+ ratio in the leaf blade in the 100 mmol/L alkali salt treatment. Although endophyte-infected L. chinensis cannot accumulate Na+ high enough to be halophytes, the observed growth promotion and stress tolerance give endophyte/plant associations the potential to be a model for endophyte-assisted phytoremediation of saline-alkaline soils.

Introduction

Soil salinization is a widespread issue throughout the world. It is estimated that more than 6 percent of the world’s land and 30 percent of the world’s irrigated areas suffer from salinity problems (Chaves etĀ al., 2009). Soil salinization generally includes two kinds of stresses: neutral salt stress resulted from NaCl and Na2SO4, and alkali salt stress resulted from NaHCO3 and Na2CO3. Plants grown in neutral salt-affected soils are mainly subjected to water deficit, ion toxicity, and disorders of mineral nutrients (Reza Sabzalian and Mirlohi, 2010). Excess amount of salt ions in soils can damage plant roots as well as the aboveground plant parts, and appear to be a major constraint to plant and crop productivity (Parihar etĀ al., 2015; Liu etĀ al., 2022). Alkali salt stress causes not only the detrimental salt stress, but also induces high pH stress. The high pH soil surrounding the roots directly reduces the root activity, interferes with ion uptake, and breaks intracellular ion balances in plants (Guo etĀ al., 2009; Kaiwen etĀ al., 2020).

Saline soil rehabilitation can be performed by non-plant based, environment-friendly modifications (e.g., structural engineering alterations, leaching of salts) and plant-based remediation (e.g., phytoremediation) (Gutierrez-Gines etĀ al., 2016). Besides halophytes, the use of plant varieties with elevated tolerance to salinity is another alternative in phytoremediation (Yin etĀ al., 2014). Several studies have demonstrated that the local adaptation of plants to their environment is usually driven by closely associated microbes (Rodriguez and Redman, 2008; Porcel etĀ al., 2011) and it has been documented that mutualistic symbiosis with rhizobia (Franzini etĀ al., 2019) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Rodriguez etĀ al., 2004; Ma etĀ al., 2021) can reduce the negative effects of salinization and improve the salt tolerance of plants grown in saline soils. Mutualistic microbiota symbiosis may improve water absorption and osmotic regulation of host plants by alleviating the adverse effects of excess salt ion accumulations in host plants (Franzini etĀ al., 2019).

Epichloë endophyte is a class of symbiotic fungi and mainly exists in the aboveground part of the plants. Plants serve as hosts and provide nutrients to their endophytes, and endophytic fungus protect them from biotic and abiotic stresses (Xia et al., 2015; Bastias et al., 2017; Shi et al., 2020), especially drought (Ren et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2015; Decunta et al., 2021; Manzur et al., 2022). Endophytic fungus confer drought tolerance to the host grass by increasing root growth, enhancing photosynthesis and osmotic adjustment (Richardson et al., 1992; Malinowski et al., 1998; Decunta et al., 2021). When growing in saline soils, plants are also exposed to drought stress. But limited studies about the effect of endophyte infection on salt tolerance of host grasses have focused on the neutral salt stress in a hydroponic system. In our previous study, we found that endophyte infection could significantly improve the tolerance of tall fescue to NaCl solution, a common lawn grass, by enhancing plant biomass and Na+ uptake ability of the host grass (Yin et al., 2014). Recently, Chen et al. (2021) found that endophyte infection ameliorated adverse effects of NaCl solution on Hordeum brevisubulatum, an important forage crop, by increasing the conducting tissues and endodermis thickness, which may help inhibiting water loss and the decrease of transport capacity. Endophyte-infected species occur in almost all habitats where grasses are common, including a large number of wild grasses, pasture grasses, lawn grasses, cultivated grains and their wild relatives, as well as weed grasses (Bacon, 1993; White, 1993; Clay and Schardl, 2002). The expression of salt tolerance in a saline hydroponic system could be different from expression in a saline soil-based system (Tavakkoli et al., 2012). Moreover, salinization and alkalization frequently co-occurred in soils, and the alkali stress expressed more serious growth inhibition than the neutral salt stress. However, little is known about whether endophyte infection can also improve the alkali tolerance of host plants.

Leymus chinensis, an important perennial rhizome grass, is widely distributed at eastern Eurasian steppe zone, from North Korea westward to Mongolia and northern China, and northwestward to Siberia. Due to excellent stress tolerance, rapid growth, high palatability and herbage production, L. chinensis is an economically and ecologically important forage grass (Lin etĀ al., 2017; Liu etĀ al., 2017). In the present study, endophyte-infected (E+) and uninfected (Eāˆ’) L. chinensis were planted under neutral salt ranging from 0 to 400 mmol/L treatments or alkali salt ranging from 0 to 300 mmol/L treatments. The changes in the plant growth and photosynthesis, biomass allocation, and the accumulation of Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+ and Na+/K+ in various plant parts were tested. Specifically, the following questions were addressed: (1) does neutral salt tolerance also exist in endophyte-infected wild grasses in soil-based system? And (2) does the endophyte improve alkali tolerance in the host grasses?

Materials and methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

In the middle and northeast parts of the Inner Mongolia steppe, L. chinensis is one of the most important dominant species. In the previous survey made by our lab (Wei etĀ al., 2006; Zhu etĀ al., 2013), the endophyte infection rate of L. chinensis in the Abaga Banner population was about 63.3%. Endophyte has been identified as EpichloĆ« bromicola (Zhu etĀ al., 2013). Thirty E+ and 30 Eāˆ’ plants were originally transplanted from different individuals in the same population from Abaga Banner of Inner Mongolia (43.90° N, 115.34° E). To avoid misleading 30 E+ and 30 Eāˆ’ plants were selected and maintained in the experimental field at Nankai University. After two years’ growth we randomly sampled tillers of approximately equal size for this experiment. During their growth, we clipped the plants repeatedly and kept them in vegetative growth. For this experiment, we transplanted 10 tillers of approximately equal size into a white plastic pot (23-cm diameter and 25-cm depth) filled with 5 kg of fluvial sand. Before conducting experiments, fluvial sand was washed with distilled water until the conductivity of the eluate was close to that of distilled water, and endophyte infection status were confirmed microscopically by examining leaf sheaths of each plant for the presence of fungal hyphae after staining with lactophenol aniline blue (Latch etĀ al., 1984). The pots were all located in the experimental field at Nankai University, with transparent flashing above them. Plants were subjected to ambient light and temperature regimes. The plant growth conditions were maintained at a mean photoperiod of 15/9 h (light/dark) and a mean air temperature of 35/24°C (day/night) with an approximate 65% relative humidity. The positions of the pots were randomly rotated each week to minimize location effects. Salt Treatment

Here two neutral salts and two alkaline salts were considered simultaneously base on the salt components and characteristics of alkaline soil in northern China. A mixture of NaCl and Na2SO4 (molar ratio, 1: 1) was withheld to induce neutral salt condition, and another mixture of NaCl, Na2SO4, NaHCO3, and Na2CO3 (molar ratio, 1: 9: 9: 1) was withheld to induce alkaline salt treatment. Neutral salt treatment included four levels: 0, 200, 300, and 400 mmol/L. Alkali salt treatment included four levels: 0, 100, 200, and 300 mmol/L. Four salts concentrations were selected according to the tolerability of L. chinensis cultivar to the salt–alkaline stress and the varying ranges of salinity and pH in the soil. Each treatment was replicated five times. Different salt levels were achieved by the addition of distilled water containing the corresponding concentration of mixed salt. The control group was watered with distilled water. The salt solution was added once every two days, and its amount was 3 times the water field capacity of the planting sand so as to wash away the previous accumulated salt. Every morning, a soil moisture probe (ECH2O Check, Decagon Devices, Pullman, WA, USA) was inserted to a depth of 5 cm into each pot to record the volumetric water content percentage, and the lost water was supplemented with distilled water to maintain the soil water content at the field water capacity level. Two hundred milliliters Hoagland complete nutrient solution was supplemented twice a week. The experiment was performed from May 10 to August 23, and lasted 105 d.

Growth parameters and metal ions measurements

The tiller number, leaf number, plant height, leaf length and leaf width of each pot were counted or measured at the beginning and end of the experiment. At the end of the experiment, grass samples were separated into the aboveground plant parts (leaf blade and leaf sheaths) and the belowground plant parts (fibrous roots and rhizomes), weighed after drying in the oven at 80°C. Afterwards, the oven-dried samples were crushed with a grinder, and then placed in a muffle furnace and ashed at 650°C. The samples were digested with 5% nitric acid. The contents of Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ in the solutions were determined by an inductively coupled plasma - optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES, Perkin Elmer Optimal 8300).

Physiological indicators measurements

Specific leaf area (SLA) was calculated using two fully unfolded new leaves for each pot to measure their area and weigh their fresh and dry weights. Leaf moisture content (LWC) was calculated by fresh weight and dry weight of leaves. Net photosynthesis (Pn) was measured on second or third leaves using a portable photosynthesis system (LI-6400, LI-COR, Lincoln, USA). Leaf nitrogen content (LNC) was determined with an elemental analyzer (vario MACRO cube, Elementar, Germany). Photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency (PNUE) was calculated as the ratio of CO2 assimilation rate to leaf nitrogen content. Chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotene in fresh leaves were extracted with solution (absolute ethanol and acetone, 1:1), and were assayed in a spectrophotometer (UV1800, Shimadzu, Japan) at wavelengths of 440, 645, and 663 nm. Photosynthetic pigment content was measured according to the procedure of Lin etĀ al. (1999).

Statistical analyses

Data were analyzed using SPSS 16.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The differences between endophyte-infected (E+) plants and uninfected (Eāˆ’) plants, and between neutral salt or alkali salt treatments were tested by one-way ANOVA LSD test at a confidence interval of 95%. Interactions between endophyte status (E) and neutral salt stress (NSS) or alkali stress (ASS) on growth parameters and physiological indexes were tested by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at a confidence interval of 95%.

Results

Plant growth and biomass allocation

At the end of the experiment, all plants except those treated with 300 mmol/L alkali salt survived, therefore we did not include 300 mmol/L treatment in the result. Both neutral salt and alkali salt stresses significantly inhibited tiller number, leaf number, plant height, SLA and LWC of L. chinensis, only alkali salt stress was more serious than neutral salt stress (TablesĀ 1, 2). Under neutral salt treatments, endophyte infection significantly increased plant height and leaf length of the host (FiguresĀ 1A, B). Under alkali salt treatments, endophyte infection significantly increased plant height, leaf length and leaf width of the host (FiguresĀ 1C–E). The effect of endophyte status on the vegetative growth of L. chinensis in the same concentration (200 mM) of NSS and ASS treatments were shown in TableĀ 2. The presence of endophyte significantly increased the plant height of L. chinensis, but neutral salt stress decreased the plant heights, and alkali salt stress decreased further. Salt stress decreased leaf length and width, and changed the size or area of leaf.

TableĀ 1

Plant heightTiller numberLeaf numberLeaf lengthLeaf widthRatio of leaf length to widthSLALWC
EF41.2394.2152.7289.3380.8112.4793.7673.010
p<0.0010.9730.3670.0050.3740.1250.2110.803
NSSF36.0721.69651.2319.6845.7790.58511.9823.22
p<0.0010.001<0.001<0.0010.0030.6290.0030.004
EƗNSSF0.2011.6361.2360.4221.1300.7911.3561.794
p0.8950.3450.1810.7390.3520.5080.0060.212
EF19.5670.9371.38818.1186.2150.5079.60712.77
p<0.0010.7310.908<0.0010.0200.4830.3450.414
ASSF127.4123.18353.31815.32837.2867.0416.70312.88
p<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.0010.004<0.001<0.001
EƗASSF11.8271.4221.5831.3850.6790.3520.4700.456
p<0.0010.2590.9150.2700.5160.7070.0130.661

ANOVA results for the effect of endophyte status, salt stress on vegetative growth of L. chinensis.

E, endophyte; NSS, neutral salt stress; ASS, alkali salt stress. Significant effects (p ≤ 0.05) are shown in bold.

TableĀ 2

Salt concentrationEndophytePlant height(cm)Leaf length (cm)Leaf width (cm)Ratio of leaf length to widthSLA(cm2/g)LWC(%)
0 mME+43.8 ± 0.6A31.1 ± 0.9A0.57 ± 0.02A55.7 ± 3.2C181.1 ± 3.9A65.5 ± 0.6A
Eāˆ’38.7 ± 0.2B28.8 ± 0.5AB0.51 ± 0.02AB57.3 ± 2.1C158.5 ± 3.7B64.9 ± 0.6A
200 mM NSSE+36.5 ± 1.1C25.8 ± 1.3BC0.44 ± 0.03B59.6 ± 4.4BC163.8 ± 3.8B62.7 ± 0.6A
Eāˆ’32.7 ± 0.9D23.9 ± 1.6C0.44 ± 0.03B54.9 ± 2.3C143.1 ± 9.3C62.8 ± 0.7A
200 mM ASSE+31.0 ± 0.7DE25.6 ± 1.8BC0.33 ± 0.03C79.7 ± 9.4A135.0 ± 2.6C49.5 ± 2.9B
Eāˆ’29.8 ± 0.7E22.4 ± 1.0C0.31 ± 0.02C72.5 ± 3.3AB131.0 ± 3.6C46.7 ± 2.6B

The effect of endophyte status on the vegetative growth of L. chinensis in the same concentration (200 mM) of NSS and ASS treatments.

E, endophyte; NSS, neutral salt stress; ASS, alkali salt stress. Different uppercase letters following the figures in the same columns indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.

FigureĀ 1

Both neutral and alkali salt stresses significantly inhibited total biomass, above- and belowground biomasses of L. chinensis, only alkali salt stress was more serious than neutral salt stress (TablesĀ 2 and 3). Under neutral salt treatment, both belowground biomass and fibrous root biomass were significantly higher in E+ plants than those in Eāˆ’ plants. For alkali salt treatment, the fibrous root biomass was also higher in E+ plants than that in Eāˆ’ plants under 200 mmol/L treatment (FiguresĀ 2A–C). Pn rates in µmol/(m2.s) were not significantly influenced by endophyte status (p=0.073) (TableĀ 3). However, when SLA was considered together Pn rates in µmol/(g.s) in E+ plants were significantly enhanced than those in Eāˆ’ plants (p=0.025) (FigureĀ 2D).

TableĀ 3

Total biomassAboveground biomassBelowground biomassFibrous root biomassRhizome biomassDead leaf biomassRoot to Shoot ratio
EF0.8570.7825.5634.9521.4280.2384.405
p0.3620.3830.0250.0330.2410.6290.044
NSSF204.282188.96228.04331.8374.04342.50110.722
p<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.0010.015<0.001<0.001
EƗNSSF3.0161.3432.7083.6520.7631.4070.148
p0.0440.2780.0620.0230.5230.2590.930
EF0.3240.4472.6963.8750.0920.6352.057
p0.5750.5100.1140.0610.7640.4330.164
ASSF155.610164.28627.84533.3873.48372.5189.903
p<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.0010.047<0.0010.001
EƗASSF1.7380.5642.8483.6840.3804.6370.619
p0.1970.5760.0780.0400.6880.0200.547

ANOVA results for the effect of endophyte status and salt stress on biomass allocation of L. chinensis.

E, endophyte; NSS, neutral salt stress; ASS, alkali salt stress. Significant effects (p ≤ 0.05) are shown in bold.

FigureĀ 2

Physiological indicators

Significant effects of neutral salt or alkali salt stresses on chlorophyll a, carotenoid and the net photosynthetic rate of leaves were observed in the present study, while these indexes were not influenced by endophyte status (TableĀ 4). Endophyte infection significantly enhanced LNC under neutral salt treatment, yet did not affect LNC under alkali salt treatment (FiguresĀ 3A, B). Both neutral salt and alkaline salt stresses had significant effects on PNUE, while endophyte infection had no significant effect on PNUE.

TableĀ 4

Chlorophyll aChlorophyll bTotal ChlorophyllChlorophyll a/bCarotenoidPnLNCPNUE
FpFpFpFpFpFpFpFp
E1.1550.2900.0340.8550.8740.3577.0920.0121.6270.2110.1310.7205.5400.0250.0130.909
NSS4.2900.0121.6620.1953.8130.0195.8710.0038.145<0.00170.191<0.0010.1020.95838.37<0.001
EƗNSS0.4210.7390.7020.5580.4660.7081.1900.3290.7590.5251.5870.2125.5910.0031.4660.242
E3.0950.0910.6650.4232.6220.1184.3980.0473.3180.0813.5270.0730.1280.7231.0890.307
ASS6.7460.0050.8800.4285.4710.01121.950.0019.6560.00194.28<0.0018.0820.00247.16<0.001
EƗASS1.0490.3661.0090.3801.0520.3651.0300.3720.9230.4110.3540.7054.4020.0240.5400.590

ANOVA results for the effect of endophyte status and salt stress on photosynthetic pigment content and photosynthetic indicators.

E, endophyte; NSS, neutral salt stress; ASS, alkali salt stress. Significant effects (p ≤ 0.05) are shown in bold.

FigureĀ 3

Changes in cation contents and K+/Na+ ratio

Both neutral salt stress and alkali salt stresses had significant effects on Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+, K+ contents and Na+/K+ ratio in L. chinensis (TableĀ 5 and 6). Under neutral salt stress, endophyte infection significantly reduced Na+ content in leaf sheaths, while enhanced Ca2+ and Mg2+contents in rhizomes (FiguresĀ 4A–C). Endophyte infection tended to decrease Na+/K+ ratio in the leaf sheath (p=0.066) (FigureĀ 4D). Under alkali salt stress, endophyte infection tended to enhance K+ in the fibrous root. Endophyte infection increased Mg2+ content in the fibrous root while decreased Na+/K+ ratio in the leaf blade in the 100 mmol/L alkali salt treatment (FiguresĀ 4E–G).

TableĀ 5

Leaf bladeLeaf sheath
Na+Ca2+Mg2+K+Na+/K+Na+Ca2+Mg2+K+Na+/K+
FpFpFpFpFpFpFpFpFpFp
E<0.0010.9950.3850.5390.2840.5981.7950.1900.2210.6416.9380.0131.3350.2570.1930.6630.2780.6023.6210.066
NSS24.35<0.00131.11<0.00127.79<0.0011.6060.20727.92<0.00147.24<0.00133.39<0.00137.24<0.00122.03<0.00134.53<0.001
EƗNSS2.1180.1170.6200.6071.0030.4040.7230.5463.0850.0411.6300.2023.2160.0361.2690.3010.4640.7091.9100.148
Fibrous rootRhizomes
Na+Ca2+Mg2+K+Na+/K+Na+Ca2+Mg2+K+Na+/K+
FpFpFpFpFpFpFpFpFpFp
E1.8300.1861.2100.279<0.0010.9853.7130.0630.6060.4423.9910.0548.0220.0084.9650.0330.1490.7022.3780.133
NSS32.74<0.0012.0140.13212.36<0.00129.38<0.00162.40<0.00182.21<0.0015.4590.0049.804<0.00121.34<0.00127.58<0.001
EƗNS1.6600.1950.7240.5452.7300.0601.5310.2251.8130.1652.6790.0640.3370.7983.5740.0250.5280.6660.5510.651

ANOVA results for the effect of endophyte status and neutral salt stress on ion contents and K+/Na+ ratio in shoots and roots.

E, endophyte; NSS, neutral salt stress. Significant effects (p ≤ 0.05) are shown in bold.

TableĀ 6

Leaf bladeLeaf sheaths
Na+Ca2+Mg2+K+Na+/K+Na+Ca2+Mg2+K+Na+/K+
FpFpFpFpFpFpFpFpFpFp
E0.2210.6430.0110.9160.4960.4882.0530.1650.4760.4970.0220.8834.2080.0511.6720.2080.1660.6870.0750.787
ASS19.38<0.00128.66<0.00117.97<0.0016.4930.00649.62<0.001110.34<0.00138.05<0.00123.51<0.00150.47<0.00157.09<0.001
EƗASS0.1960.8230.2890.7520.8490.4401.6630.2113.3550.0523.3670.0512.0860.1460.6240.5440.0460.9551.4770.248
Fibrous rootsRhizomes
Na+Ca2+Mg2+K+Na+/K+Na+Ca2+Mg2+K+Na+/K+
FpFpFpFpFpFpFpFpFpFp
E0.3290.5710.0720.7900.2530.6203.6970.0630.0640.8021.2960.2660.0020.9610.0040.9521.9950.1710.4980.487
ASS102.46<0.0016.6090.0053.3640.052186.4<0.00187.34<0.00145.83<0.00135.39<0.00138.08<0.001221.7<0.00136.00<0.001
EƗASS0.5220.6001.0440.3673.0390.0677.2520.0030.0540.9471.5300.2371.3890.2692.3170.1201.2480.3050.3690.695

ANOVA results for the effect of endophyte status and alkali salt stress on ion contents and K+/Na+ ratio in shoots and roots.

E, endophyte; ASS, alkali salt stress. Significant effects (p ≤ 0.05) are shown in bold.

FigureĀ 4

Discussion

Both alkali salt and neutral salt stresses involved in deleterious effects of salinity on plant growth; the adverse effects of high pH alkaline solutions on plant growth were more severe than those of low pH salt treatments. High pH is the key characteristic of alkali salt stress that is different from salt stress. The responses of L. chinensis were significantly correlated not only with salinity but also with the pH of the alkalinity treatment. It has been reported that alkali salt produced a stronger stress than neutral salt in both halophytes and glycophytes (Yang etĀ al., 2009; Li etĀ al., 2010; Gong etĀ al., 2014). In the present study, L. chinensis survived under 400 mmol/L neutral salt treatment, yet died under 300 mmol/L alkali salt treatment, which was consistent with previous reports.

It has been well documented that Epichloë endophyes could ameliorate drought stress for both agronomically important forage species (Clay and Schardl, 2002; Saikkonen et al., 2006) and wild grass species (Ren and Clay, 2009; Liu et al., 2017). In the hydroponic experiment, the beneficial effects of Epichloë endophytes on NaCl tolerance has been demonstrated in several studies (Reza Sabzalian and Mirlohi, 2010; Yin et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2021). However, expressions of salinity tolerance in hydroponic systems might different with the performance in the soil. Tavakkoli et al. (2010); Tavakkoli et al. (2012) compared salt tolerance of barley under three different growing conditions (hydroponics, potted soil and a naturally saline field) and found that salt tolerance differences between genotypes were expressed when grown in the soil, but cannot be discerned when grown in the hydroponic system. As for plants grown in the potted soil or in the naturally saline field, they expressed similar degrees of salt tolerance. In the present study, we found that endophyte infection significantly increased plant height, leaf length and fibrous root biomass under both neutral and alkali salt stresses, indicating that Epichloë endophytes can improve the host resistance to both neutral salt as well as alkali salt grown in the potted soil, only their beneficial effect was more obvious under neutral salt stress than under alkali salt stress.

The mechanisms involved in endophyte-associated salt tolerance of the host have not been documented. According to reported studies and our research, the following possible reasons were proposed. Firstly, endophyte infection could improve root absorption that may alleviate drought and nutrients deficiency during salt stresses. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi has been reported to enhance plant growth under salt stress mainly through an extensive hyphal network which allowed enhancement of water and nutrient acquisition (Plenchette and Duponnois, 2005). Epichloë endophytes can also increase root absorption (Malinowski et al., 1999; Crush et al., 2004) in response to water stress. In the present study, L. chinensis produces two structurally and functionally different organs belowground: fibrous roots that play a central role for root absorption, and rhizomes that serve mainly as translocation conduits and overwinter storage. We found that endophyte infection significantly enhanced fibrous root biomass under both neutral and alkali salt stresses. Although we did not find that endophyte infection improved leaf water content of the host, we did find that endophyte infection increased LNC under neutral salt stress, which was usually negatively influenced by salt stress (Frechilla et al., 2001).

Another mechanism used by Epichloë endophytes to promote salt tolerance of the host may be the regulation of plant nutrition. The Na+ ion is the main toxic ion in salinized soil. Unlike Na+, K+ plays a key role in many physiological processes vital to plant growth. Under salt stress, a good balance of Na+/K+ ratio is important for maintaining ion balance and a number of enzymatic processes, and thus is a potential indicator of salt tolerance in the plants (Munns and Tester, 2008; Abdelhamid et al., 2010; Tomar and Agarwal, 2013). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi has been found to play a significant role in sustaining a high K+/Na+ ratio in plants that were exposed to salt stress (Selvakumar and Thamizhiniyan, 2011; Zhang et al., 2011; Kadian et al., 2013; Fariduddin et al., 2014). In the present study, we found that endophyte infection tended to decrease Na+/K+ ratio in leaf sheath under neutral salt stress, and also reduced Na+/K+ ratio in leaf blade in the 100 mmol/L alkali salt treatment.

The accumulations of Ca2+ and Mg2+ in plants are usually inhibited by salt stress (Khan etĀ al., 1999; Aziz and Khan, 2001). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi has been documented to increase the uptake and concentration of Ca2+ in different plants (Elhindi etĀ al., 2017; Cui etĀ al., 2019). Rahman and Saiga (2005) reported that endophyte-infected tall fescue had a greater ability to take up Ca2+ and Mg2+, compared to uninfected plants under normal growth conditions. Bayat etĀ al. (2009) found that endophytes increased Ca2+ content in tall fescue under drought stress. In the present study, endophyte infection increased Ca2+ and Mg2+ contents in the rhizome under neutral salt stress while increased Mg2+ content in the fibrous root in 100 mmol/L alkali salt treatment. It is well known that Mg2+ is the key component of chlorophyll. The Ca2+ ion can maintain membrane stability, help to form cell walls, and take part in signal transduction. Here, increased Mg2+ in response to endophyte infection may be related to alleviate chlorophyll breakdown, while increased Ca2+ may be related to membrane stability and signal transduction (Cui etĀ al., 2019; Thor, 2019).

Conclusion

There are over 932 million hectares of land suffering salinization and alkalization around the world (Rengasamy, 2006). It is estimated that soil salinization caused a total loss of US$27.3 billion, with a direct impact on the global economy (Meena etĀ al., 2017). This study demonstrated that endophyte infection could enhance host tolerance to both neutral salt and alkali salt stresses. The significant effect of endophyte infection was decreasing Na+/K+ ratio, increasing Ca2+and Mg2+ contents, and thus promoted leaf and fibrous root growth. It is estimated that at least 30% of approximately 3000 pooid grass species harbor systemic endophytes, and most can develop this mutualistic association (Leuchtmann, 1992). In this respect, the potential application of endophytes to mitigate negative salt stress impact would be a more favorable choice. Certainly, this experiment was conducted using soil in pots. Further comparisons of E+ and Eāˆ’ plants under natural field stress conditions will help to verify the potential use of grass-endophyte symbiota in phytoremediation of saline-alkaline soils.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31971425).

Acknowledgments

We greatly appreciate the support of Abaga banner grassland workstation for their invaluable assistance on this experiment.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Statements

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author contributions

LY and MW did experimental work. GW analysed the data and drafted the manuscript. AR designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1

    AbdelhamidM. T.ShokrM. M. B.BekhetaM. A. (2010). Growth, root characteristics, and leaf nutrients accumulation of four faba bean (vicia fabal.) cultivars differing in their broomrape tolerance and the soil properties in relation to salinity. Commun. Soil Sci. Plan41, 2713–2728. doi:Ā 10.1080/00103624.2010.518263

  • 2

    AzizI.KhanM. A. (2001). Experimental assessment of salinity tolerance of ceriops tagal seedlings and saplings from the indus delta, pakistan. Aquat Bot.70, 259–268. doi:Ā 10.1016/s0304-3770(01)00160-7

  • 3

    BaconC. W. (1993). Abiotic stress tolerances (moisture, nutrients) and photosynthesis in endophyte-infected tall fescue. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.44, 123–141. doi:Ā 10.1016/0167-8809(93)90042-n

  • 4

    BastiasD. A.MartĆ­nez-GhersaM. A.BallarĆ©C. L.GundelP. E. (2017). EpichloĆ« fungal endophytes and plant defenses: Not just alkaloids. Trends Plant Sci.22, 939–948. doi:Ā 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.08.005

  • 5

    BayatF.MirlohiA.KhodambashiM. (2009). Effects of endophytic fungi on some drought tolerance mechanisms of tall fescue in a hydroponics culture. Rus J. Plant Physl56, 510–516. doi:Ā 10.1134/s1021443709040104

  • 6

    ChavesM. M.FlexasJ.PinheiroC. (2009). Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: Regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann. Bot.103, 551–560. doi:Ā 10.1093/aob/mcn125

  • 7

    ChenT.WhiteJ. F.LiC. (2021). Fungal endophyte epichloĆ« bromicola infection regulates anatomical changes to account for salt stress tolerance in wild barley (hordeum brevisubulatum). Plant Soil461, 533–546. doi:Ā 10.1007/s11104-021-04828-w

  • 8

    ClayK.SchardlC. (2002). Evolutionary origins and ecological consequences of endophyte symbiosis with grasses. Am. Nat.160 Suppl 4, S99–S127. doi:Ā 10.1086/342161

  • 9

    CrushJ. R.PopayA. J.WallerJ. (2004). Effect of different neotyphodium endophytes on root distribution of a perennial ryegrass (lolium perenne l.) cultivar. N. Z J. Agric. Res.47, 345–349. doi:Ā 10.1080/00288233.2004.9513603

  • 10

    CuiL.GuoF.ZhangJ.YangS.MengJ.GengY.et al. (2019). Synergy of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and exogenous ca(2+) benefits peanut (arachis hypogaea l.) growth through the shared hormone and flavonoid pathway. Sci. Rep.9, 16281. doi:Ā 10.1038/s41598-019-52630-7

  • 11

    DecuntaF. A.PerezL. I.MalinowskiD. P.Molina-MontenegroM. A.GundelP. E. (2021). A systematic review on the effects of epichloe fungal endophytes on drought tolerance in cool-season grasses. Front. Plant Sci.12. doi:Ā 10.3389/fpls.2021.644731

  • 12

    ElhindiK. M.El-DinA. S.ElgorbanA. M. (2017). The impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in mitigating salt-induced adverse effects in sweet basil (ocimum basilicum l.). Saudi J. Biol. Sci.24, 170–179. doi:Ā 10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.02.010

  • 13

    FariduddinQ.MirB. A.YusufM.AhmadA. (2014). 24-epibrassinolide and/or putrescine trigger physiological and biochemical responses for the salt stress mitigation in cucumis sativus l. Photosynthetica.52, 464–474. doi:Ā 10.1007/s11099-014-0052-7

  • 14

    FranziniV. I.AzconR.Ruiz-LozanoJ. M.ArocaR. (2019). Rhizobial symbiosis modifies root hydraulic properties in bean plants under non-stressed and salinity-stressed conditions. Planta.249, 1207–1215. doi:Ā 10.1007/s00425-018-03076-0

  • 15

    FrechillaS.LasaB.IbarretxeL.LamsfusC.Aparicio-TejoP. (2001). Pea responses to saline stress is affected by the source of nitrogen nutrition (ammonium or nitrate). Plant Growth Regulation35, 171–179. doi:Ā 10.1023/a:1014487908495

  • 16

    GongB.LiX.BlosziesS.WenD.SunS.WeiM.et al. (2014). Sodic alkaline stress mitigation by interaction of nitric oxide and polyamines involves antioxidants and physiological strategies in solanum lycopersicum. Free Radic. Biol. Med.71, 36–48. doi:Ā 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.02.018

  • 17

    GuoR.ShiL.YangY. (2009). Germination, growth, osmotic adjustment and ionic balance of wheat in response to saline and alkaline stresses. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.55, 667–679. doi:Ā 10.1111/j.1747-0765.2009.00406.x

  • 18

    Gutierrez-GinesM. J.HernandezA. J.PastorJ. (2016). Impacts of soil-soluble anions on wild and cultivated herbaceous species: Implications for soil phytoremediation. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.16, 423–437.

  • 19

    KadianN.YadavK.BaddaN.AggarwalA. (2013). Am fungi ameliorates growth, yield and nutrient uptake in cicer arietinum l. under salt stress. Russian Agric. Sci.39, 321–329.

  • 20

    KaiwenG.ZisongX.YuzeH.QiS.YueW.YanhuiC.et al. (2020). Effects of salt concentration, ph, and their interaction on plant growth, nutrient uptake, and photochemistry of alfalfa (medicago sativa) leaves. Plant Signal. Behav.15, 1832373. doi:Ā 10.1080/15592324.2020.1832373

  • 21

    KhanM. A.UngarI. A.ShowalterA. M. (1999). Effects of salinity on growth, ion content, and osmotic relations inhalopyrum mucronatum(l.) stapf. J. Plant Nutr.22, 191–204. doi:Ā 10.1080/01904169909365617

  • 22

    LatchG. C. M.ChristensenM. J.SamuelsG. J. (1984). Five endophytes of lolium and festuca in new zealand. Mycotaxon.20, 535–550.

  • 23

    LeuchtmannA. (1992). Systematics, distribution, and host specificity of grass endophytes. Nat. Toxins1, 150–162. doi:Ā 10.1002/nt.2620010303

  • 24

    LinF. P.ChenZ. H.ChenZ. P.ZhangD. M. (1999). Physiological and biochemical responses of the seedlings of four legume tree species to high co2 concentration. Chin. J. Plant Ecol.23, 220–222.

  • 25

    LinJ.WangY.SunS.MuC.YanX. (2017). Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the growth, photosynthesis and photosynthetic pigments of leymus chinensis seedlings under salt-alkali stress and nitrogen deposition. Sci. Total Environ.576, 234–241. doi:Ā 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.091

  • 26

    LiR.ShiF.FukudaK. (2010). Interactive effects of salt and alkali stresses on seed germination, germination recovery, and seedling growth of a halophyte spartina alterniflora (poaceae). S Afr J. Bot.76, 380–387. doi:Ā 10.1016/j.sajb.2010.01.004

  • 27

    LiuZ.LiuP.QiD.PengX.LiuG. (2017). Enhancement of cold and salt tolerance of arabidopsis by transgenic expression of the s-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase gene from leymus chinensis. J. Plant Physiol.211, 90–99. doi:Ā 10.1016/j.jplph.2016.12.014

  • 28

    LiuC.MaoB.YuanD.ChuC.DuanM. (2022). Salt tolerance in rice: Physiological responses and molecular mechanisms. Crop J.10, 13–25. doi:Ā 10.1016/j.cj.2021.02.010

  • 29

    MalinowskiD. P.AlloushG. A.BeleskyD. P. (1998). Evidence for chemical changes on the root surface of tall fescue in response to infection with the fungal endophyte neotyphodium coenophialum. Plant Soil205, 1–12. doi:Ā 10.1023/a:1004331932018

  • 30

    MalinowskiD. P.BeleskyD. P.FeddersJ. M. (1999). Endophyte infection may affect the competitive ability of tall fescue grown with red clover. J. Agron. Crop Science183, 91–101. doi:Ā 10.1046/j.1439-037x.1999.00322.x

  • 31

    ManzurM. E.GarelloF. A.OmaciniM.SchnyderH.SutkaM. R.Garcia-ParisiP. A. (2022). Endophytic fungi and drought tolerance: Ecophysiological adjustment in shoot and root of an annual mesophytic host grass. Funct. Plant Biol.49, 272–282. doi:Ā 10.1071/FP21238

  • 32

    MaP.ShiZ.DiaoF.HaoL.ZhangJ.XuJ.et al. (2021). Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and na+ accumulation of suaeda glauca (bunge) grown in salinized wetland soils. Appl. Soil Ecol.166, 104065. doi:Ā 10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104065

  • 33

    MeenaB. L.RattanR. K.DattaS. P. (2017). Solubility relationships of iron and evaluation of its fertility status in degraded soils. Commun. Soil Sci. Plan48, 1059–1067. doi:Ā 10.1080/00103624.2017.1323098

  • 34

    MunnsR.TesterM. (2008). Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.59, 651–681. doi:Ā 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911

  • 35

    PariharP.SinghS.SinghR.SinghV. P.PrasadS. M. (2015). Effect of salinity stress on plants and its tolerance strategies: A review. Environ. Sci. pollut. Res. Int.22, 4056–4075. doi:Ā 10.1007/s11356-014-3739-1

  • 36

    PlenchetteC.DuponnoisR. (2005). Growth response of the saltbush atriplex nummularia l. to inoculation with the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus glomus intraradices. J. Arid Environ.61, 535–540. doi:Ā 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.10.003

  • 37

    PorcelR.ArocaR.Ruiz-LozanoJ. M. (2011). Salinity stress alleviation using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev.32, 181–200. doi:Ā 10.1007/s13593-011-0029-x

  • 38

    RahmanM. H.SaigaS. (2005). Endophytic fungi (neotyphodium coenophialum) affect the growth and mineral uptake, transport and efficiency ratios in tall fescue (festuca arundinacea). Plant Soil272, 163–171. doi:Ā 10.1007/s11104-004-4682-6

  • 39

    RenA.ClayK. (2009). Impact of a horizontally transmitted endophyte,balansia henningsiana, on growth and drought tolerance ofpanicum rigidulum. Int. J. Plant Sci.170, 599–608. doi:Ā 10.1086/597786

  • 40

    RengasamyP. (2006). World salinization with emphasis on australia. J. Exp. Bot.57, 1017–1023. doi:Ā 10.1093/jxb/erj108

  • 41

    RenA. Z.LiX.HanR.YinL. J.WeiM. Y.GaoY. B. (2011). Benefits of a symbiotic association with endophytic fungi are subject to water and nutrient availability in achnatherum sibiricum. Plant Soil346, 363–373. doi:Ā 10.1007/s11104-011-0824-9

  • 42

    Reza SabzalianM.MirlohiA. (2010). Neotyphodium endophytes trigger salt resistance in tall and meadow fescues. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci.173, 952–957. doi:Ā 10.1002/jpln.200900345

  • 43

    RichardsonM.ChapmanG.Jr.HovelandC.BaconC. (1992). Sugar alcohols in endophyte-infected tall fescue under drought. Crop Sci.32, 1060–1061.

  • 44

    RodriguezC.MayoJ. C.SainzR. M.AntolinI.HerreraF.MartinV.et al. (2004). Regulation of antioxidant enzymes: A significant role for melatonin. J. Pineal Res.36, 1–9. doi:Ā 10.1046/j.1600-079x.2003.00092.x

  • 45

    RodriguezR.RedmanR. (2008). More than 400 million years of evolution and some plants still can't make it on their own: Plant stress tolerance via fungal symbiosis. J. Exp. Bot.59, 1109–1114. doi:Ā 10.1093/jxb/erm342

  • 46

    SaikkonenK.LehtonenP.HelanderM.KorichevaJ.FaethS. H. (2006). Model systems in ecology: Dissecting the endophyte-grass literature. Trends Plant Sci.11, 428–433. doi:Ā 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.07.001

  • 47

    SelvakumarG.ThamizhiniyanP. (2011). The effect of the arbuscular mycorrhizal (am) fungus glomus intraradices on the growth and yield of chilli (capsicum annuum l.) under salinity stress. World Appl. Sci. J.14, 1209–1214.

  • 48

    ShiX.QinT.LiuH.WuM.LiJ.ShiY.et al. (2020). Endophytic fungi activated similar defense strategies of achnatherum sibiricum host to different trophic types of pathogens. Front. Microbiol.11, 1607 doi:Ā 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01607

  • 49

    TavakkoliE.FatehiF.RengasamyP.McDonaldG. K. (2012). A comparison of hydroponic and soil-based screening methods to identify salt tolerance in the field in barley. J. Exp. Bot.63, 3853–3867. doi:Ā 10.1093/jxb/ers085

  • 50

    TavakkoliE.RengasamyP.McDonaldG. (2010). The response of barley to salinity stress differs between hydroponic and soil systems. Funct. Plant Bio37, 621–633. doi:Ā 10.1071/FP09202

  • 51

    ThorK. (2019). Calcium-nutrient and messenger. Front. Plant Sci.10. doi:Ā 10.3389/fpls.2019.00440

  • 52

    TomarN. S.AgarwalR. M. (2013). Influence of treatment of jatropha curcas l. leachates and potassium on growth and phytochemical constituents of wheat (triticum aestivum l.). Amer J. Bot.04, 1134–1150. doi:Ā 10.4236/ajps.2013.45140

  • 53

    WangX.QinJ.ChenW.ZhouY.RenA.GaoY. (2015). Pathogen resistant advantage of endophyte-infected over endophyte-free leymus chinensis is strengthened by pre-drought treatment. Eur. J. Plant Pathol.144, 477–486. doi:Ā 10.1007/s10658-015-0788-3

  • 54

    WeiY. K.GaoY. B.XuH.SuD.ZhangX.WangY. H.et al. (2006). Occurrence of endophytes in grasses native to northern china. Grass Forage Sci.61, 422–429. doi:Ā 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2006.00551.x

  • 55

    WhiteJ. F. (1993). Endophyte-host associations in grasses. xix. a systematic study of some sympatric species of epichloe in england. Mycologia.85, 444. doi:Ā 10.1080/00275514.1993.12026295

  • 56

    XiaC.ZhangX.ChristensenM. J.NanZ.LiC. (2015). EpichloĆ« endophyte affects the ability of powdery mildew (blumeria graminis) to colonise drunken horse grass (achnatherum inebrians). Fungal Eco16, 26–33. doi:Ā 10.1016/j.funeco.2015.02.003

  • 57

    YangC. W.XuH. H.WangL. L.LiuJ.ShiD. C.WangD. L. (2009). Comparative effects of salt-stress and alkali-stress on the growth, photosynthesis, solute accumulation, and ion balance of barley plants. Photosynthetica.47, 79–86. doi:Ā 10.1007/s11099-009-0013-8

  • 58

    YinL.RenA.WeiM.WuL.ZhouY.LiX.et al. (2014). Neotyphodium coenophialum-infected tall fescue and its potential application in the phytoremediation of saline soils. Int. J. Phytoremediation16, 235–246. doi:Ā 10.1080/15226514.2013.773275

  • 59

    ZhangJ.ZhangY.DuY.ChenS.TangH. (2011). Dynamic metabonomic responses of tobacco (nicotiana tabacum) plants to salt stress. J. Proteome Res.10, 1904–1914. doi:Ā 10.1021/pr101140n

  • 60

    ZhuM.-J.RenA.WenW.GaoY.-B. (2013). Diversity and taxonomy of endophytes from leymus chinensis in the inner mongolia steppe of china. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.340, 135–145. doi:Ā 10.1111/1574-6968.12083

Summary

Keywords

endophyte, Epichloƫ bromicola, Leymus chinensis, neutral salt stress, alkali salt stress

Citation

Yin L, Wei M, Wu G and Ren A (2022) Epichloƫ endophytes improved Leymus chinensis tolerance to both neutral and alkali salt stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 13:968774. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.968774

Received

14 June 2022

Accepted

04 October 2022

Published

18 October 2022

Volume

13 - 2022

Edited by

Janusz Zwiazek, University of Alberta, Canada

Reviewed by

Barbara Wiewióra, Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, Poland; Ágnes Szepesi, University of Szeged, Hungary

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Guanghong Wu, ; Anzhi Ren,

This article was submitted to Plant Abiotic Stress, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics