Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 23 August 2022
Sec. Plant Cell Biology
This article is part of the Research Topic Functions and Signaling Mechanisms of FERONIA Receptor Kinase View all 4 articles

FERONIA functions through Target of Rapamycin (TOR) to negatively regulate autophagy

  • 1Department of Genetics, Development and Cell Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States
  • 2Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States
  • 3Plant Sciences Institute, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States

FERONIA (FER) receptor kinase plays versatile roles in plant growth and development, biotic and abiotic stress responses, and reproduction. Autophagy is a conserved cellular recycling process that is critical for balancing plant growth and stress responses. Target of Rapamycin (TOR) has been shown to be a master regulator of autophagy. Our previous multi-omics analysis with loss-of-function fer-4 mutant implicated that FER functions in the autophagy pathway. We further demonstrated here that the fer-4 mutant displayed constitutive autophagy, and FER is required for TOR kinase activity measured by S6K1 phosphorylation and by root growth inhibition assay to TOR kinase inhibitor AZD8055. Taken together, our study provides a previously unknown mechanism by which FER functions through TOR to negatively regulate autophagy.

Introduction

FERONIA (FER) is a receptor-like kinase (RLK) and belongs to the Catharantus roseus RLK1-like (CrRLK1L) subfamily. FER functions together with co-receptors LLGs/LRE, cell wall components, such as LRX proteins and pectin, and ligands such as RALFs to regulate many downstream signaling components to play essential roles in plant growth and development, reproduction and stress responses (Boisson-Dernier et al., 2011; Lindner et al., 2012; Haruta et al., 2014; Li et al., 2016; Franck et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2018; Duan et al., 2020; Solis-Miranda and Quinto, 2021; Lin et al., 2022; Xie et al., 2022). FER was first identified for its crucial role in female reproduction, as loss-of-function fer mutants displays reduced fertility due to pollen tube overgrowth (Escobar-Restrepo et al., 2007). FER was also required for optimal vegetative growth (Guo et al., 2009) and root hair development (Duan et al., 2010). Subsequent studies revealed more functions of FER, including plant hormone Abscisic Acid (ABA) signaling (Yu et al., 2012), cold and heat stress responses (Chen et al., 2016), salt stress response (Feng et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2018; Gigli-Bisceglia and Testerink, 2021), photooxidative stress (Shin et al., 2021), mechano-sensing (Shih et al., 2014; Tang et al., 2022), thigmomorphogenesis (Darwish et al., 2022) and immune responses to bacterial pathogens (Keinath et al., 2010; Stegmann et al., 2017; Guo et al., 2018), fungal pathogens (Kessler et al., 2010; Masachis et al., 2016) and nematodes (Zhang et al., 2020). Recent study showed that FER-mediated ROS production regulates levels of beneficial pseudomonads in the rhizosphere microbiome, independent of FER’s immune function (Song et al., 2021). Our most recent study also revealed novel functions of FER in the negative regulation of Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) body formation and glucosinolate biosynthesis (Wang et al., 2022).

Autophagy, meaning “self-eating,” is a conserved cellular recycling process that employs specialized vesicles to encapsulate and deliver cytoplasmic material to the vacuole for degradation. Cargoes including single macromolecules, large macromolecular complexes such as ribosomes and proteasomes, protein aggregates, damaged or whole organelles, and even invading pathogens can be eliminated through autophagy in bulk or selectively (Liu and Bassham, 2012; Marshall and Vierstra, 2018). This autophagic process is critical for removing non-functional molecules within the cell and replenishing the nutrient sources for new growth, and it is also important for regulating specific biological processes or signaling pathways by selectively degrading specific cargoes (Zhou et al., 2014; Nolan et al., 2017; Zhuang et al., 2018; Xia et al., 2020; Lin et al., 2021; Luo et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021; Liao et al., 2022). Thus, autophagy plays important roles in plant growth and development and stress responses to facilitate plant tolerance and survival under unfavorable conditions (Marshall and Vierstra, 2018). In plants, autophagy is maintained at a basal level during growth and development to ensure homeostasis, but it is upregulated under environmental stresses to aid plant survival (Wang et al., 2018). The autophagy process starts with induction by upstream kinases, following by cargo recognition, phagophore formation, phagophore expansion and closure, autophagosome fusion and breakdown in vacuoles (Marshall and Vierstra, 2018).

The core machinery of autophagy is conserved among eukaryotes and is mainly regulated by two energy sensors, Sucrose Non-Fermenting (SNF)-related kinase 1 (SnRK1) and Target of Rapamycin (TOR). In Arabidopsis, SnRK1 is required for autophagy induction under a wide variety of stress conditions (Soto-Burgos and Bassham, 2017). SnRK1 activates autophagy through direct phosphorylation of ATG1 and through inhibition of TOR activity, and functions upstream of TOR (Chen et al., 2017; Soto-Burgos and Bassham, 2017). In contrast, TOR kinase functions as a negative regulator of plant autophagy (Liu and Bassham, 2010). In the case of TOR inactivation, the transcripts of many autophagy-related genes (ATGs) were significantly up-regulated in Arabidopsis, leading to the activation of autophagy machinery (Liu et al., 2012; Dong et al., 2015). In yeast and Arabidopsis, TOR regulates autophagy through direct phosphorylation of ATG13 (Alers et al., 2012; Son et al., 2018; van Leene et al., 2019).

FERONIA and TOR have both been shown to positively regulate plant growth. Very recently, the crosstalk between FER-mediated signaling and TOR-mediated nutrient/energy metabolism has been reported, which revealed that FER interacts with the TOR pathway to regulate nitrogen-related nutrient signaling under low nutrient conditions (Song et al., 2022). However, how FER regulates autophagy and whether or not this regulation is through TOR is unknown. In this study, we investigated autophagy phenotype of fer-4 mutant, and our genetic studies showed strong interaction between FER and TOR in plant growth and autophagy. We further found that FER is required for TOR kinase activity. Our results showed that FER functions through TOR to negatively regulate autophagy.

Materials and methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

The Arabidopsis accession Columbia-0 was used as WT in all experiments. T-DNA insertion mutants fer-4 (GABI-106A06), TOROE (GABI_548G07), raptor1b (SALK_078159), s6k1 (SALK_148694) were described previously (Anderson et al., 2005; Deprost et al., 2007; Henriques et al., 2010; Ren et al., 2011; Guo et al., 2018). GFP-ATG8e overexpression line was previously described (Xiong et al., 2007). For all experiments involving Arabidopsis plants, seeds were sterilized with 70% ethanol containing 0.1% Triton and germinated on 1/2 Linsmainer and Skoog (LS) plates with 1% sucrose and 0.7% agar, with or without treatments as indicated when it is appropriate. 10-day old seedlings were transferred into soil at 22°C under long-day (16 h light/8 h dark) conditions with a photon fluence rate of ∼120 μmol m–2s–1.

Sucrose starvation and autophagosome observation

For autophagosome observation and quantification, 7-day-old seedlings grown under constant light were transferred to control 1/2 LS plates with 1% sucrose and starvation plates without sucrose, and incubate in dark for three days. GFP-ATG8e-labeled autophagosomes were observed and counted by epifluorescence microscopy using a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) filter. Representative GFP-labeled autophagosome images were taken by confocal microscopy using a Zeiss Laser Scanning Microscope 700 (LSM700) with a 63 × oil immersion objective. GFP was excited with a 488 nm laser line and detected from 555 nm.

AZD8055 treatment

For root growth inhibition assay, sterilized seeds were germinated on control 1/2 LS or plates containing 1 μM AZD8055 for 7 days under constant light. The plates were scanned and the root lengths were measured using ImageJ.

For short term AZD8055 treatment for western blotting, 10-day-old seedlings grown on 1/2 LS plates were transferred to control liquid 1/2 LS or 1/2 LS with AZD8055 for the amount of time indicated in each experiment. The seedlings were collected and dabbed dry and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. The samples were ground in 2xSDS buffer (100 mM Tris–HCl pH 6.8, 4% (w/v) SDS, 20% (v/v) glycerol, 0.2% (w/v) bromophenol blue, 0.2 M β-mercaptoethanol) and used for immunoblot analysis using anti-S6K1/2 antibody (Agrisera, AS121855). The relative intensity of P-S6K and S6K were quantified using ImageJ.

For short term AZD8055 treatment for autophagosome observation, 7-day-old seedlings of WT GFP-ATG8e and fer-4 GFP-ATG8e grown on 1/2 LS plates were transferred to control liquid 1/2 LS or 1/2 LS with 1 μM AZD8055 for 6 hours before observation under an epifluorescence microscope.

GFP-ATG8e cleavage assay

Seven-day-old WT GFP-ATG8e and fer-4 GFP-ATG8e seedlings were subjected to 1/2 LS liquid medium without sucrose for 6, 12, and 24 hours in dark, or to 1/2 LS liquid with or without 1 μM AZD8055 for 6 hours in light before harvesting. Total protein was isolated with 2xSDS buffer (100 mM Tris–HCl pH 6.8, 4% (w/v) SDS, 20% (v/v) glycerol, 0.2% (w/v) bromophenol blue, 0.2 M β-mercaptoethanol) and resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE gels for immunoblot analysis using monoclonal anti-GFP antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, MAB3836). The relative intensity of GFP-ATG8e and free GFP were quantified using ImageJ.

Protoplast isolation and transient expression assays

Leaves of 4-week-old Col-0 and raptor1b plants grown under long-day conditions were collected and peeled for protoplast isolation as previously described (Yoo et al., 2007; Wu et al., 2009). Protoplasts were resuspended in MMg solution (400 mM mannitol, 15 mM MgCl2, and 4 mM MES pH5.7). Plasmids of 35S:GFP control, 35S:FER-GFP and 35S:mCherry-ATG8e were prepared using Maxiprep kits (Sigma-Aldrich, NA0310) and set the final concentration at 1 μg/μL. Ten micrograms of each plasmid was introduced into 200 μL protoplasts by adding 220 μL of PEG solution (40% PEG4000, 200 mM mannitol, and 100 mM CaCl2). After transformation, protoplasts were washed and incubated in 1 mL of W5 solution (154 mM NaCl, 125 mM CaCl2, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM MES pH5.7) overnight.

For sucrose starvation, protoplasts were incubated in W5 solution without sucrose or with 0.5% (w/v) sucrose as control for 36 hours at room temperature. For constitutive autophagy in raptor1b mutant, protoplasts were incubated in W5 solution only for 20 hours. Protoplasts were observed using an epifluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss Axio Imager.A2, Germany) with TRITC filter. Protoplasts with more than three visible autophagosomes were counted as being active for autophagy. A total of 100 well-expressed protoplasts were observed per treatment per genotype, and the percentage of protoplasts with active autophagy was quantified and averaged from 3-4 independent replicates (Wang et al., 2021).

Generalized linear model

To specifically examine the genotype-by-treatment interaction to determine the sensitivity of the fer-4, TOROE, and fer-4 TOROE to AZD treatment, we used a generalized linear model (glm package in R) with genotype and treatment (Control or AZD) as fixed factors. Genotypes were categorized as significantly differentially responsive to AZD if they had a genotype-by-treatment interaction p-value < 0.05 compared to all other lines.

Statistical analysis

Graphs were created in GraphPad Prism software (version 9.3.0). SPSS version 27.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, United States) was used for statistical data analysis. The data are shown as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) and were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) Tukey’s multiple range tests (p < 0.05).

Results

FER negatively regulates autophagy

Our recently published multi-omics analysis of the loss-of-function fer-4 mutant revealed that the Gene Ontology term, autophagy (GO:0006914) is enriched (Wang et al., 2022), suggesting that FER plays a role in autophagy regulation. We then compared fer-4 transcriptome and proteome to autophagy-related genes (Homma et al., 2011). The analysis revealed that about 36% (77/212) of the genes known to be involved in plant autophagy have altered levels of transcripts or proteins in fer-4 mutant (Figure 1A; Supplementary Table 1). Closer examination showed that at least 16 genes with known functions in autophagy have altered transcripts or protein levels in fer-4, including many autophagy-related genes (ATGs), Target of Rapamycin (TOR) and Regulatory-associated protein of TOR 1B (RAPTOR1B) (Figure 1B).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Comparison of autophagy-related genes with transcriptome and proteome of fer-4. (A) Venn diagram showing the overlaps among autophagy-related genes (Homma et al., 2011) and differentially expressed transcripts and proteins in fer-4 mutant. (B) Selected genes involved in autophagy and their changes in two sets of differentially expressed data (UP: increased levels in fer-4 mutant; DN: decreased levels in fer-4 mutant).

To gain a better understanding of the role FER plays in autophagy, we crossed GFP-ATG8e transgenic plants with fer-4 mutant to generate fer-4 GFP-ATG8e. ATG8e is localized on the autophagic membranes and can serve as a reliable marker for autophagosome observation and quantification (Contento et al., 2005). We carried out sucrose starvation followed by autophagosome quantification in 10-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings.

While very few autophagosomes were evident in WT GFP-ATG8e under normal growth conditions, the number was substantially increased by sucrose starvation. Interestingly, the fer-4 GFP-ATG8e displayed constitutive autophagy, with significantly increased levels of autophagosomes under both normal and starvation conditions (Figures 2A,B). The results indicated that FER functions to suppress autophagy pathway. To further support that FER functions to inhibit autophagy pathway, we generated a second FER mutant allele, FER-miRNA/GFP-ATG8e, by overexpressing FER-miRNA in WT GFP-ATG8e plants. FER-miRNA is highly effective in knocking down the endogenous FER (Guo et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2022). Three T2 transgenic lines (FER-miRNA/GFP-ATG8e #1, #2, #4), in which the FER protein levels were significantly decreased, were used for sucrose starvation followed by autophagosome quantification (Figure 2C). Similar to fer-4 GFP-ATG8e, all three lines had higher levels of autophagosomes than WT GFP-ATG8e under both nutrient-rich (SUC +) and sucrose starvation (SUC-) conditions (Figure 2D).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. FER negatively regulates autophagy under sucrose starvation. (A) Representative confocal microscopic images of WT and fer-4 with autophagosome marker GFP-ATG8e, under control (SUC +) and sucrose starvation (SUC-) conditions. The Lavender arrows indicate autophagosomes. Scale = 40 μm. (B) Quantification of autophagosomes of the 10-day-old seedlings from (A). Data are shown as means ± SEM from 3 biological replicates, with 6-12 images per replicate. Different letters indicate significant difference among groups subjected to one-way ANOVA Tukey’s multiple range tests (p < 0.05). (C) Western blot showing the decreased FER protein levels in multiple T2 lines of FER-miRNA/GFP-ATG8e using anti-FER antibody (Guo et al., 2018). Lines #1, #2 and #4 were used for further autophagy analysis. Rubisco was used as loading control. (D) Quantification of autophagosomes of the 10-day-old seedlings from C with or without sucrose and grown in dark for 3 days. Data are shown as means ± SEM from 5-12 seedlings, with 2-3 images per seedlings. Different letters indicate significant difference among groups subjected to one-way ANOVA Tukey’s multiple range tests (p < 0.05). (E) GFP-ATG8e cleavage assays showing the increased autophagic flux in fer-4 mutant. Seven-day-old WT GFP-ATG8e and fer-4 GFP-ATG8e seedlings were subjected to 1/2 LS liquid medium without sucrose for 6, 12, and 24 hours in dark. The total proteins were extracted and separated by SDS-PAGE gels followed by immunoblotting with anti-GFP antibody. Ponceau S staining serves as protein loading control. The values below the blots are the ratios of free GFP over GFP-ATG8e. This experiment was carried out two times with similar results.

Upon autophagosome fusion with vacuole, the GFP-ATG8e protein is delivered to vacuole where it is degraded to release a free and relatively stable GFP; and the free GFP/GFP-ATG8e ratio reflects the level of autophagy activity (Li et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2017). Seven-day-old WT GFP-ATG8e and fer-4 GFP-ATG8e seedlings were treated in sucrose-free 1/2 LS medium in dark for 0, 6, 12, and 24 h. As shown in Figure 2E, the release of free GFP was readily observed in both WT and fer-4 mutant plants upon carbon starvation, whereas the free GFP/GFP-ATG8e ratios in the fer-4 mutant were higher than that in WT, even at 0 hour control condition, suggesting that there was constitutive autophagy in fer-4 mutant and depletion of FER enhances autophagic activity. These results demonstrated that FER negatively regulates autophagy.

TOR is a negative regulator of autophagy in plants (Liu and Bassham, 2010) and its kinase inhibitor AZD8055 was used to induce autophagy by suppressing TOR activity (Dong et al., 2015; Pu et al., 2017). We also applied 1 μM AZD8055 to 7-day-old WT GFP-ATG8e and fer-4 GFP-ATG8e seedlings for 6 hours for autophagosomes observation and GFP-ATG8e cleavage assay. Similar to sucrose starvation, the fer-4 GFP-ATG8e had significantly more autophagosomes (Figure 3A) and higher free GFP/GFP-ATG8e ratios (Figure 3B) than WT GFP-ATG8e under both control and AZD8055 treatment conditions. These results further supports that FER negatively regulates autophagy.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. FER negatively regulates autophagy under AZD8055 treatment. (A) Quantification of autophagosomes. Seven-day-old seedlings of WT GFP-ATG8e and fer-4 GFP-ATG8e grown on 1/2 LS plates were transferred to control liquid 1/2 LS or 1/2 LS with 1 μM AZD8055 for 6 h. Data are shown as means ± SEM from 11-13 seedlings, with 2-3 images per seedlings. Different letters indicate significant difference among groups subjected to one-way ANOVA Tukey’s multiple range tests (p < 0.05). (B) GFP-ATG8e cleavage assays of seedlings from A. The total proteins were extracted and separated by SDS-PAGE gels followed by immunoblotting with anti-GFP antibody. Ponceau S staining serves as protein loading control. The values below the blots are the ratios of free GFP over GFP-ATG8e. This experiment was carried out two times with similar results.

FER is required for TOR kinase activity

TOR is an atypical Ser/Thr kinase of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related lipid kinase family. Similar to its counterparts in yeast and mammals, TOR functions in a complex with RAPTOR and LST8 and plays central roles in balancing nutrient, energy, and internal and external stimuli to regulate plant growth development and stress responses (Shi et al., 2018). The fact that both TOR and FER positively regulate plant growth and negatively regulate autophagy (Figures 23; Deprost et al., 2007; Guo et al., 2009; Liu and Bassham, 2010; Pu et al., 2017; Soto-Burgos and Bassham, 2017) prompted us to examine their interactions more closely.

The comparison of genes mis-expressed in fer-4 (Wang et al., 2022) and the genes regulated by AZD8055 (Dong et al., 2015) revealed that a large number of TOR-dependent genes (40% of AZD-repressed, p < 0.001; 42% of AZD-induced, p < 0.001) are regulated by FER (Figures 4A,B). Interestingly, majority of the 40% of AZD-repressed genes (86%, p < 0.001) have decreased transcript levels in fer-4, and majority of the 42% of AZD-induced genes (93%, p < 0.001) have increased transcript levels in fer-4, which suggests a corporative relationship between FER and TOR (Figures 4A,B and Supplementary Tables 23). Comparisons with differentially expressed proteins in fer-4 gave similar results (Figure 4A and Supplementary Tables 2, 3). We also compared AZD8055 regulated genes with two other sets of published transcriptome data of fer-4, one was from 10-day-old seedlings in Wang et al. (2022) and another was in Guo et al. (2018). The amount of overlaps are very similar, which further strengthened our observation that FER and TOR interact in a cooperative manner (Supplementary Figure 1).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. FER and TOR cooperate in plant growth and autophagy. (A) Hypergeometric tests on the comparisons of AZD-regulated transcripts and differentially expressed transcripts or proteins in fer-4 mutant. Significant overlaps are highlighted in yellow. DE: differentially expressed; NS: not significant. (B) Venn diagram showing the comparison of differentially expressed transcripts in fer-4 and differentially expressed genes in response to TOR kinase inhibitor AZD8055 treatment (Dong et al., 2015). The red *** represents the overlaps statistically significant with p < 0.001. (C) Growth phenotype of 3-week-old plants of WT, fer-4, TOROE and fer-4 TOROE double mutant. (D) Representative confocal microscopic images of WT, fer-4, TOROE and fer-4 TOROE with autophagosome marker GFP-ATG8e, under control (SUC +) and sucrose starvation (SUC-) conditions. The Lavender arrows indicate the autophagosomes. Scale = 40 μm. (E) Quantification of autophagosomes in different genotypes expressing GFP-ATG8e from 10-day-old seedlings with or without sucrose for 3 days. Data are shown as means ± SEM from 3 biological replicates, with 14-31 images per replicate. Different letters indicate significant difference among groups subjected to one-way ANOVA Tukey’s multiple range tests (p < 0.05).

We further constructed the double mutant fer-4 TOROE GFP-ATG8e, where TOROE is a TOR overexpression T-DNA insertional mutant (Deprost et al., 2007). While the TOROE mutant growth phenotype is similar to that of WT and has decreased autophagy induction by sucrose starvation, fer-4 TOROE GFP-ATG8e mirrors fer-4 GFP-ATG8e, with stunted growth and constitutive autophagy (Figures 4C–E), which suggests that either FER is epistatic to TOR or TOR activity requires FER.

To clarify the genetic relationship between FER and TOR, we carried out a transient assay by co-expressing FER-GFP and autophagy marker mCherry-ATG8e in protoplasts. We first found that FER-GFP transient expression in Col-0 protoplasts could dramatically inhibit autophagy induction by sucrose starvation (Figure 5A). There was constitutive autophagy in raptor1b protoplasts even without any treatment compared with WT (Figure 5B; Pu et al., 2017). However, FER-GFP overexpression could not inhibit such constitutive autophagy in raptor1b (Figure 5B), suggesting that RAPTOR1B functions downstream of FER. This result suggests that TOR/RAPTOR1B complex functions downstream of FER, and the previous observation in the fer TOROE double mutant is likely due to that FER is required for TOR activity.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. FER-GFP inhibits sucrose starvation-induced autophagy but not the constitutive autophagy in raptor1b. (A,B) Quantification of protoplasts with ATG8e labeled autophagy. (A) GFP control or FER-GFP was co-expressed with mCherry-ATG8e in Col-0 protoplasts, treated without or with 0.5% (w/v) sucrose for 36 h before microscopy. B, GFP control or FER-GFP was co-expressed with mCherry-ATG8e in Col-0 and raptor1b protoplasts, followed by 20 h incubation before microscopy. Protoplasts with more than three visible autophagosomes were counted as being active for autophagy. A total of 100 well-expressed protoplasts were observed for each treatment per genotype, and the percentage of protoplasts with active autophagy was calculated. Data are shown as means ± SEM from 3-4 biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant difference among groups subjected to one-way ANOVA Tukey’s multiple range tests (p < 0.05).

To further clarify that TOR requires FER for its activity, we carried out a root growth inhibition assay in response to TOR kinase inhibitor AZD8055. After growing on control 1/2 LS plates or plates containing 1 μM AZD8055 for 7 days, WT root growth was inhibited by 1 μM AZD8055 to 36% of the control treatment, while fer-4 was hypersensitive to the inhibitor treatment, with root growth decreased to 27% of the control, suggesting decreased TOR activity in fer-4 mutant. As expected, TOROE is less sensitive to AZD8055 than that of WT with 41% growth, and fer-4 TOROE double mutant is more sensitive to the inhibitor, with 26% growth of the control, similar to fer-4 mutant (Figures 6A,B).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. fer-4 was more sensitive to AZD in root growth assay. (A) Images of 7-day-old seedlings of WT, fer-4, TOROE and fer-4 TOROE grown on control 1/2 MS plates or plates containing 1 μM AZD8055. (B) Root length measured from seedlings of A using ImageJ. Data are shown as means ± SEM (n = 12). Different letters indicate significant difference among groups subjected to one-way ANOVA Tukey’s multiple range tests (p < 0.05). (C) Root growth inhibition by AZD8055 was analyzed using a generalized linear model (glm package in R) with genotype and treatment (Control or AZD) as fixed factors. The genotypes were categorized as significantly differentially responsive to AZD if they had a genotype-by-treatment interaction p-value < 0.05 compared to all other genotypes (n = 12).

To ascertain that fer-4 TOROE responded in a similar fashion to fer-4 single mutant in AZD8055-mediated root inhibition, we also analyzed the responses of WT, fer-4, TOROE, and fer-4 TOROE to AZD8055 using a generalized linear model (glm package in R) with genotype and treatment (Control or AZD) as fixed factors. Similar results were obtained that fer-4 and fer-4 TOROE are more sensitive to AZD8055 treatment while TOROE is more resistant to the treatment significantly (Figure 6C).

S6K1/2, P70 ribosomal S6 kinases, are substrates of TOR kinase and their phosphorylation status can be used as an indicator of TOR kinase activity (Mahfouz et al., 2006). To further examine TOR activity in the fer-4 mutant, we obtained anti-S6K1/2 and anti-P-S6K1/2 antibodies from Agrisera and tested in WT with and without AZD8055 treatment. While anti-P-S6K1/2 antibody only recognized the phosphorylated S6K1/2, anti-S6K1/2 antibody recognized both phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated S6K1/2 (Figure 7A). AZD8055 (5 μM) treatment for three hours completely diminished the phosphorylated S6K1/2 (Figure 7A), confirming that S6K phosphorylation can be used as a readout of TOR activity. The anti-S6K1/2 antibody can recognize both forms of S6K1 and has high specificity since very little signal (likely from S6K2) was observed in s6k1 mutant (Figure 7B), and it was therefore used for subsequent experiments.

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. S6K1/2 phosphorylation by TOR was decreased in fer-4 mutant. (A) Western blot showing testing of anti-S6K1/2 and anti-P-S6K1/2 (phosphorylated S6K1/2) antibodies in WT with or without 5 μM AZD8055 for 3 h. Ponceau S staining was used as loading control. (B,C) Western blot showing phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated S6K1 in 10-day-old seedlings of indicated genotypes, with and without different concentrations of AZD8055 treatment for 1 h (B) or under control or sucrose-starvation conditions (C). The ratios of P-S6K1/S6K1 were obtained using ImageJ, and the ratio in WT was set as 1.0 in (B) and 1.0 for TOROE in (C). IWS1 protein was used as loading control with anti-IWS1 (Wang et al., 2021). (D) A working model showing a possible mechanism in which FER activates TOR/RAPTOR1B to inhibit autophagy.

Western blotting was carried out using 10-day-old seedlings with and without treatment of different AZD8055 concentrations for one hour. Compared to WT, fer-4 mutant has decreased TOR kinase activity, with lowered P-S6K1/S6K1 ratio. The raptor1b mutant, where TOR activity is severely compromised, has no detectable phosphorylated S6K1 (Figure 7B). The TOR OE plants have relatively higher P-S6K1/S6K1 ratio than that in WT after AZD8055 treatment (Supplementary Figure 2). We further examined the TOR kinase activity in fer-4 TOROE double mutant. Under normal growth conditions supplemented with sucrose, while fer-4 has decreased and TOROE has elevated TOR kinase activity, the double mutant behaves like fer-4, with decreased TOR kinase activity reflected by lowered P-S6K1/S6K1 ratio, compared to WT control. Sucrose starvation for three days decreased both forms of the S6K1 protein level (Figure 7C). Taken together, these results support the hypothesis that FER is required for TOR kinase activity and its normal function.

In summary, our results demonstrated that FER is required for TOR kinase activity, and FER functions through TOR kinase to negatively regulate autophagy (Figure 7D). Thus, our results provide novel insights into the regulation of autophagy by a plasma membrane-localized receptor-like kinase FER.

Discussion

FERONIA receptor kinase is a versatile regulator and mediates many important biological processes in plant growth, development and stress responses. Our recent integrated omics analysis of fer-4 mutant not only confirmed the previous known FER functions but also revealed novel pathways regulated by FER and underlying molecular mechanisms, such as ER body formation, indole glucosinolate biosynthesis and ABA responses (Wang et al., 2022). In this study, we further expanded the findings and provided genetic, molecular and cell biological evidence that FER is involved in autophagy regulation. Consistent with the significant overlaps between autophagy genes and those affected in fer-4 mutant (Figure 1), fer mutants displayed constitutive autophagy phenotype under normal condition, sucrose starvation and AZD8055 treatments (Figures 2, 3). Further genetic, cell biology and biochemical assays showed that FER is required for TOR kinase activity (Figures 47). Our results indicated that FER functions through TOR to negatively regulate autophagy.

As a conserved cellular process, autophagy plays important roles in recycling cytosolic material and maintaining cellular homeostasis during growth, development and responses to diverse environmental stresses. TOR, as an essential serine/threonine kinase, is a master regulator of autophagy. From cargo selection to the destination vacuole, autophagy involves many steps, and TOR plays important roles in integrating the nutrient and energy signals to initiate autophagy (Liu and Bassham, 2012; Marshall and Vierstra, 2018; Soto-Burgos et al., 2018). Despite all of the progress, how TOR is regulated by signaling pathways is less known. This study provides new insights into how TOR is regulated by a plasma membrane-localized receptor kinase, capable of integrating internal and external stimuli, to regulate autophagy.

FERONIA has been shown to physically interact with TOR kinase complex (Martínez Pacheco et al., 2022; Song et al., 2022). It is conceivable that FER and TOR also directly interact during autophagy regulation. Another possible mechanism by which FER regulates TOR kinase activity is through a Rho GTPase, ROP2. ROP2 has been shown to directly interact and activate TOR in response to auxin and light (Li et al., 2017; Schepetilnikov et al., 2017). FER was shown to directly interact with ROP2 and activate ROP2-mediated signaling (Duan et al., 2010). It is also conceivable that FER functions in the same complex with ROP2 and TOR, and thus activates TOR kinase.

We previously observed that TOR and RAPTOR1B protein levels were increased in fer-4 mutant (Figure 1B) while TOR has reduced activity in the mutant (Figures 6, 7). This seemingly conflicting observation could be due to the possibility that kinase activity is negatively correlated to its protein stability, lower TOR kinase activity stabilizes the protein. This is also observed in the case of FERONIA kinase. When transiently expressed in Nicotiana Benthamiana, FERK565R, an inactive kinase accumulated to much higher levels compared to the wild-type FER (Guo et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2022). When transformed to fer-4 for complementation, FERK565R protein levels are in general higher that wild-type FER, whereas FERK565R could not complement the mutant to the same extent as the wild-type FER (Chakravorty et al., 2018).

Our multi-omics data analysis with fer-4 mutant produced many enriched GO terms related to nutrient and energy production and metabolism (Wang et al., 2022), suggesting that FER plays important roles in nutrient and energy homeostasis. Our study therefore suggests an exciting possibility that FER and TOR function together to gauge nutrient and energy levels and regulate autophagy induction. Consistent with this possibility, a recent study showed that RALF1-FER complex interacts with and activates TOR signaling in response to nitrogen starvation (Song et al., 2022). FER regulates diverse biological processes, and autophagy is a critical cellular recycling process involved in plant growth development and stress responses. We show here that FER is required for TOR kinase activity and FER functions through TOR to regulate autophagy. How FER/TOR-regulated autophagy is involved in FER-regulated biological processes will be interesting for future studies.

Data availability statement

The original raw data presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author. The raw RNA and protein sequencing data are from our previous published article (Wang et al., 2022), which deposited the data at the Gene Expression Omnibus under series GSE143634 and GSE191303, and on MassIVE under series MSV000084804.

Author contributions

HG conceived the project. HG and PW performed the genetic, molecular, biochemical, and cell biology analysis. GS performed the proteomics. NC, GS, and TN performed the omics data analysis. NC performed the statistical analysis for transcript and protein enrichment. OW, DB, and C-YL contributed to data analysis. HG and PW wrote the manuscript, with edits or input from other co-authors. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from National Institute of Health (NIH 1R01GM120316-01A1 to YY, DB, and JW), National Science Foundation (NSF MCB-1818160 to YY and JW), and Plant Sciences Institute at Iowa State University (to YY and JW).

Conflict of interest

HG and YY were co-inventors on the patent US9512440B2, titled “Modulation of receptor-like kinase for promotion of plant growth”.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.961096/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure 1 | Comparison of AZD8055 regulated genes with another two sets of published transcriptomes of fer-4. (A) Venn diagram comparison of differentially expressed transcripts in 10-day-old fer-4 seedlings (Wang et al., 2022) with differentially expressed genes in response to TOR kinase inhibitor AZD8055 treatment (Dong et al., 2015). (B–C) Venn diagram comparisons of the co-regulated genes from A and from Figure 4B. (D) Venn diagram comparison of differentially expressed transcripts in fer-4 published by Guo et al. (2018) with differentially expressed genes in response to TOR kinase inhibitor AZD8055 treatment (Dong et al., 2015). (E–F) Venn diagram comparisons of the co-regulated genes from (D) and from Figure 4B.

Supplementary Figure 2 | S6K1 phosphorylation in WT and TOR OE seedlings. Seven-day-old seedlings were treated with 0.2 μM AZD8055 for 2 hours. Ponceau S staining was used as loading control. The ratios of P-S6K1/S6K1 were obtained using ImageJ, and the ratio in WT was set as 1.0.

References

Alers, S., Löffler, A. S., Wesselborg, S., and Stork, B. (2012). Role of AMPK-mTOR-Ulk1/2 in the Regulation of Autophagy: Cross Talk. Shortcuts, and Feedbacks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 32, 2–11. doi: 10.1128/mcb.06159-11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anderson, G. H., Veit, B., and Hanson, M. R. (2005). The Arabidopsis AtRaptor genes are essential for post-embryonic plant growth. BMC Biol. 3:12. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-3-12

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Boisson-Dernier, A., Kessler, S. A., and Grossniklaus, U. (2011). The walls have ears: The role of plant CrRLK1Ls in sensing and transducing extracellular signals. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 1581–1591. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq445

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chakravorty, D., Yu, Y., and Assmann, S. M. (2018). A kinase-dead version of FERONIA receptor-like kinase has dose-dependent impacts on rosette morphology and RALF1-mediated stomatal movements. FEBS Lett. 592, 3429–3437. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.13249

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, J., Yu, F., Liu, Y., Du, C., Li, X., Zhu, S., et al. (2016). FERONIA interacts with ABI2-type phosphatases to facilitate signaling cross-talk between abscisic acid and RALF peptide in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113:E5519–E5527. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1608449113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, L., Su, Z. Z., Huang, L., Xia, F. N., Qi, H., Xie, L. J., et al. (2017). The AMP-activated protein kinase kin10 is involved in the regulation of autophagy in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 8:1201. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01201

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Contento, A. L., Xiong, Y., and Bassham, D. C. (2005). Visualization of autophagy in Arabidopsis using the fluorescent dye monodansylcadaverine and a GFP-AtATG8e fusion protein. Plant J. 42, 598–608. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02396.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Darwish, E., Ghosh, R., Ontiveros-Cisneros, A., Cuong Tran, H., Petersson, M., de Milde, L., et al. (2022). Touch signaling and thigmomorphogenesis are regulated by complementary CAMTA3-and JA-dependent pathways. Sci. Adv. 8:eabm2091. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abm2091

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deprost, D., Yao, L., Sormani, R., Moreau, M., Leterreux, G., Bedu, M., et al. (2007). The Arabidopsis TOR kinase links plant growth, yield, stress resistance and mRNA translation. EMBO Rep. 8, 864–870. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7401043

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dong, P., Xiong, F., Que, Y., Wang, K., Yu, L., Li, Z., et al. (2015). Expression profiling and functional analysis reveals that TOR is a key player in regulating photosynthesis and phytohormone signaling pathways in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 6:677. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00677

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Duan, Q., Kita, D., Li, C., Cheung, A. Y., and Wu, H. M. (2010). FERONIA receptor-like kinase regulates RHO GTPase signaling of root hair development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 17821–17826. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005366107

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Duan, Q., Liu, M. C. J., Kita, D., Jordan, S. S., Yeh, F. L. J., Yvon, R., et al. (2020). FERONIA controls pectin- and nitric oxide-mediated male–female interaction. Nature 579, 561–566. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2106-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Escobar-Restrepo, J. M., Huck, N., Kessler, S., Gagliardini, V., Gheyselinck, J., Yang, W. C., et al. (2007). The FERONIA receptor-like kinase mediates male-female interactions during pollen tube reception. Science 317, 656–660. doi: 10.1126/science.1143964

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Feng, W., Kita, D., Peaucelle, A., Cartwright, H. N., Doan, V., Duan, Q., et al. (2018). The FERONIA Receptor Kinase Maintains Cell-Wall Integrity during Salt Stress through Ca2+ Signaling. Curr. Biol. 28, 666.e–675.e. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Franck, C. M., Westermann, J., and Boisson-Dernier, A. (2018). Plant Malectin-Like Receptor Kinases: From Cell Wall Integrity to Immunity and Beyond RLK: Receptor-like kinase. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 69, 301–328. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gigli-Bisceglia, N., and Testerink, C. (2021). Fighting salt or enemies: Shared perception and signaling strategies. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 64:102120. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2021.102120

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, H., Li, L., Ye, H., Yu, X., Algreen, A., and Yin, Y. (2009). Three related receptor-like kinases are required for optimal cell elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 7648–7653. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812346106

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, H., Nolan, T. M., Song, G., Liu, S., Xie, Z., Chen, J., et al. (2018). FERONIA Receptor Kinase Contributes to Plant Immunity by Suppressing Jasmonic Acid Signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Biol. 28, 3316–3324.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.07.078

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haruta, M., Sabat, G., Stecker, K., Minkoff, B. B., and Sussman, M. R. (2014). A Peptide Hormone and Its Receptor Protein Kinase Regulate Plant Cell Expansion. Science 343, 408–411. doi: 10.1126/science.1244454

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Henriques, R., Magyar, Z., Monardes, A., Khan, S., Zalejski, C., Orellana, J., et al. (2010). Arabidopsis S6 kinase mutants display chromosome instability and altered RBR1-E2F pathway activity. EMBO J. 29, 2979–2993. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.164

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Homma, K., Suzuki, K., and Sugawara, H. (2011). The autophagy database: An all-inclusive information resource on autophagy that provides nourishment for research*. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D986–90. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq995

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keinath, N. F., Kierszniowska, S., Lorek, J., Bourdais, G., Kessler, S. A., Shimosato-Asano, H., et al. (2010). PAMP (Pathogen-associated Molecular Pattern)-induced changes in plasma membrane compartmentalization reveal novel components of plant immunity. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 39140–39149. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.160531

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kessler, S. A., Shimosato-Asano, H., Keinath, N. F., Wuest, S. E., Ingram, G., Panstruga, R., et al. (2010). Conserved Molecular Components for Pollen Tube Reception and Fungal Invasion. Science 330, 968–971. doi: 10.1126/science.1195211

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, C., Wu, H. M., and Cheung, A. Y. (2016). FERONIA and her pals: Functions and mechanisms. Plant Physiol. 171, 2379–2392. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00667

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, F., Chung, T., and Vierstra, R. D. (2014). AUTOPHAGY-RELATED 11 plays a critical role in general autophagy- and senescence-induced mitophagy in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 26, 788–807. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.120014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, X., Cai, W., Liu, Y., Li, H., Fu, L., Liu, Z., et al. (2017). Differential TOR activation and cell proliferation in Arabidopsis root and shoot apexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 2765–2770. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1618782114

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liao, C., Wang, P., Yin, Y., and Bassham, D. C. (2022). Interactions between autophagy and phytohormone signaling pathways in plants. FEBS Lett. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.14355

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, W., Tang, W., Pan, X., Huang, A., Gao, X., Anderson, C. T., et al. (2022). Arabidopsis pavement cell morphogenesis requires FERONIA binding to pectin for activation of ROP GTPase signaling. Curr. Biol. 32, 497–507.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.11.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, Y., Guo, R., Ji, C., Zhou, J., and Jiang, L. (2021). New insights into AtNBR1 as a selective autophagy cargo receptor in Arabidopsis. Plant Signal. Behav. 16:e1839226. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2020.1839226

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lindner, H., Müller, L. M., Boisson-Dernier, A., and Grossniklaus, U. (2012). CrRLK1L receptor-like kinases: Not just another brick in the wall. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 15, 659–669. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2012.07.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Y., and Bassham, D. C. (2010). TOR is a negative regulator of autophagy in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS One 5:e11883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011883

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Y., and Bassham, D. C. (2012). Autophagy: Pathways for self-eating in plant cells. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 63, 215–237. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105441

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Burgos, J. S., Deng, Y., Srivastava, R., Howell, S. H., and Bassham, D. C. (2012). Degradation of the endoplasmic reticulum by autophagy during endoplasmic reticulum stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24, 4635–4651. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.101535

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Luo, S., Li, X., Zhang, Y., Fu, Y., Fan, B., Zhu, C., et al. (2021). Cargo recognition and function of selective autophagy receptors in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22:1013. doi: 10.3390/ijms22031013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mahfouz, M. M., Kim, S., Delauney, A. J., and Verma, D. P. S. (2006). Arabidopsis TARGET of RAPAMYCIN interacts with RAPTOR, which regulates the activity of S6 kinase in response to osmotic stress signals. Plant Cell 18, 477–490. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.035931

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marshall, R. S., and Vierstra, R. D. (2018). Annual Review of Plant Biology Autophagy: The Master of Bulk and Selective Recycling. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 69, 173–208. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martínez Pacheco, J., Song, L., Berdion Gabarain, V., Manuel Peralta, J., Urzúa Lehuedé, T., Angel Ibeas, M., et al. (2022). Cell surface receptor kinase FERONIA linked to nutrient sensor TORC1 signaling controls root hair growth at low temperature in Arabidopsis thaliana. bioRxiv [Preprint]. doi: 10.1101/2022.01.10.475584

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Masachis, S., Segorbe, D., Turrà, D., Leon-Ruiz, M., Fürst, U., el Ghalid, M., et al. (2016). A fungal pathogen secretes plant alkalinizing peptides to increase infection. Nat. Microbiol. 1:16043. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.43

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nolan, T. M., Brennan, B., Yang, M., Chen, J., Zhang, M., Li, Z., et al. (2017). Selective Autophagy of BES1 Mediated by DSK2 Balances Plant Growth and Survival. Dev. Cell 41, 33–46. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.03.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pu, Y., Luo, X., and Bassham, D. C. (2017). TOR-dependent and -independent pathways regulate autophagy in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 8:1204. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01204

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ren, M., Qiu, S., Venglat, P., Xiang, D., Feng, L., Selvaraj, G., et al. (2011). Target of rapamycin regulates development and ribosomal RNA expression through kinase domain in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 155, 1367–1382. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.169045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schepetilnikov, M., Makarian, J., Srour, O., Geldreich, A., Yang, Z., Chicher, J., et al. (2017). GTPase ROP 2 binds and promotes activation of target of rapamycin. TOR, in response to auxin. EMBO J. 36, 886–903. doi: 10.15252/embj.201694816

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, L., Wu, Y., and Sheen, J. (2018). TOR signaling in plants: Conservation and innovation. Development 145:dev160887. doi: 10.1242/dev.160887

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shih, H. W., Miller, N. D., Dai, C., Spalding, E. P., and Monshausen, G. B. (2014). The receptor-like kinase FERONIA is required for mechanical signal transduction in Arabidopsis seedlings. Curr. Biol. 24, 1887–1892. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.064

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shin, S. Y., Park, J. S., Park, H. B., Moon, K. B., Kim, H. S., Jeon, J. H., et al. (2021). FERONIA Confers Resistance to Photooxidative Stress in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 12:714938. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.714938

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Solis-Miranda, J., and Quinto, C. (2021). The CrRLK1L subfamily: One of the keys to versatility in plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 166, 88–102. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.05.028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Son, O., Kim, S., Kim, D., Hur, Y. S., Kim, J., and Cheon, C. I. (2018). Involvement of TOR signaling motif in the regulation of plant autophagy. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 501, 643–647. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.05.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Song, L., Xu, G., Li, T., Zhou, H., Lin, Q., Chen, J., et al. (2022). The RALF1-FERONIA Complex Interacts with and Activates TOR Signaling in Response to Low Nutrients. Mol. Plant 15, 1120–1136. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2022.05.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Song, Y., Wilson, A. J., Zhang, X. C., Thoms, D., Sohrabi, R., Song, S., et al. (2021). FERONIA restricts Pseudomonas in the rhizosphere microbiome via regulation of reactive oxygen species. Nat. Plants 7, 644–654. doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00914-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Soto-Burgos, J., and Bassham, D. C. (2017). SnRK1 activates autophagy via the TOR signaling pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS One 12:e0182591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182591

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Soto-Burgos, J., Zhuang, X., Jiang, L., and Bassham, D. C. (2018). Dynamics of autophagosome formation. Plant Physiol. 176, 219–229. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.01236

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stegmann, M., Monaghan, J., Smakowska-Luzan, E., Rovenich, H., Lehner, A., Holton, N., et al. (2017). The receptor kinase FER is a RALF-regulated scaffold controlling plant immune signaling. Science 355, 287–289. doi: 10.1126/science.aal2541

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tang, W., Lin, W., Zhou, X., Guo, J., Dang, X., Li, B., et al. (2022). Mechano-transduction via the pectin-FERONIA complex activates ROP6 GTPase signaling in Arabidopsis pavement cell morphogenesis. Curr. Biol. 32, :508–517.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.11.031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

van Leene, J., Han, C., Gadeyne, A., Eeckhout, D., Matthijs, C., Cannoot, B., et al. (2019). Capturing the phosphorylation and protein interaction landscape of the plant TOR kinase. Nat. Plants 5, 316–327. doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0378-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, P., Clark, N. M., Nolan, T. M., Song, G., Bartz, P. M., Liao, C.-Y., et al. (2022). Integrated omics reveal novel functions and underlying mechanisms of the receptor kinase FERONIA in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 34, 2594–2614. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koac111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, P., Mugume, Y., and Bassham, D. C. (2018). New advances in autophagy in plants: Regulation, selectivity and function. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 80, 113–122. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.07.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, P., Nolan, T. M., Clark, N. M., Guo, H., Bassham, D. C., Walley, J. W., et al. (2021). The F-box E3 ubiquitin ligase BAF1 mediates the degradation of the brassinosteroid-activated transcription factor BES1 through selective autophagy in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 33, 3532–3554. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koab210

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, F. H., Shen, S. C., Lee, L. Y., Lee, S. H., Chan, M. T., and Lin, C. S. (2009). Tape-Arabidopsis sandwich – a simpler Arabidopsis protoplast isolation method. Plant Methods 5:16. doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-5-16

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xia, F., Zeng, B., Liu, H., Qi, H., Xie, L., Yu, L., et al. (2020). SINAT E3 Ubiquitin Ligases Mediate FREE1 and VPS23A Degradation to Modulate Abscisic Acid Signaling. Plant Cell 32, 3290–3310. doi: 10.1105/tpc.20.00267

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xie, Y., Sun, P., Li, Z., Zhang, F., You, C., and Zhang, Z. (2022). FERONIA Receptor Kinase Integrates with Hormone Signaling to Regulate Plant Growth. Development, and Responses to Environmental Stimuli. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23:3730. doi: 10.3390/ijms23073730

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiong, Y., Contento, A. L., Nguyen, P. Q., and Bassham, D. C. (2007). Degradation of oxidized proteins by autophagy during oxidative stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 143, 291–299. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.092106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yoo, S. D., Cho, Y. H., and Sheen, J. (2007). Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: A versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1565–1572. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.199

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, F., Qian, L., Nibau, C., Duan, Q., Kita, D., Levasseur, K., et al. (2012). FERONIA receptor kinase pathway suppresses abscisic acid signaling in Arabidopsis by activating ABI2 phosphatase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 14693–14698. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212547109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, X., Peng, H., Zhu, S., Xing, J., Li, X., Zhu, Z., et al. (2020). Nematode-Encoded RALF Peptide Mimics Facilitate Parasitism of Plants through the FERONIA Receptor Kinase. Mol. Plant 13, 1434–1454. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.08.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, C., Zayed, O., Yu, Z., Jiang, W., Zhu, P., Hsu, C. C., et al. (2018). Leucine-rich repeat extensin proteins regulate plant salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 13123–13128. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1816991115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, J., Zhang, Y., Qi, J., Chi, Y., Fan, B., Yu, J. Q., et al. (2014). E3 Ubiquitin Ligase CHIP and NBR1-Mediated Selective Autophagy Protect Additively against Proteotoxicity in Plant Stress Responses. PLoS Genet. 10:e1004478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004116

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhuang, X., Chung, K. P., Luo, M., and Jiang, L. (2018). Autophagosome Biogenesis and the Endoplasmic Reticulum: A Plant Perspective. Trends Plant Sci. 23, 677–692. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.05.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Autophagy, AZD8055, FERONIA, S6K1 phosphorylation, TOR

Citation: Wang P, Clark NM, Nolan TM, Song G, Whitham OG, Liao C-Y, Montes-Serey C, Bassham DC, Walley JW, Yin Y and Guo H (2022) FERONIA functions through Target of Rapamycin (TOR) to negatively regulate autophagy. Front. Plant Sci. 13:961096. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.961096

Received: 03 June 2022; Accepted: 29 July 2022;
Published: 23 August 2022.

Edited by:

Hugo H. Zheng, McGill University, Canada

Reviewed by:

Alice Y. Cheung, University of Massachusetts Amherst, United States
Xiaohong Zhuang, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

Copyright © 2022 Wang, Clark, Nolan, Song, Whitham, Liao, Montes-Serey, Bassham, Walley, Yin and Guo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Hongqing Guo, hguo@iastate.edu

Present Address: Trevor M. Nolan, Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.