Tengbo Huang
Elena M. Kramer
Deshu Lin- 1Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Plant Epigenetics, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
- 2Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States
- 3Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
Editorial on the Research Topic
Petal Development: From Cell Biology to EvoDevo
The petal is an excellent model system for studying plant organogenesis because it is simple in structure and dispensable for plant viability (Irish, 2008). The petal is also a useful system for investigating plant-animal interactions, as it is the major plant part that attracts pollinators in many outcrossing species (Fenster et al., 2004; Stuurman et al., 2004). The nine articles in this Research Topic focus on several important aspects of research associated with petal development and function. We organize this collection of studies into several groups based on common themes as described below.
Specification of Petal Identity
In the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis, Brassicaceae), petal primordia arise in the second whorl of the four concentric floral whorls. Specification of petal identity depends on the combinatorial regulation of MADS box transcription factors encoded by the APETALA1 (AP1), APETALA3 (AP3), PISTILLATA (PI), and SEPALLATA (SEP) genes (Wellmer et al., 2014). In this Research Topic, Deveaux et al. investigate an ortholog of AP3, NdAP3-3, in Nigella damascena (Ranunculaceae). They analyze the putative target genes of NdAP3-3 and compare them with those of the AP3 homologs in Arabidopsis and Aquilegia coerulea (Ranunculaceae). They identify a number of common genes in each comparison, which shows the functional conservation of AP3 genes during plant evolution.
Petal Growth Mediated by the Cell Proliferation to Expansion Transition
The growth of petal primordia in the second whorl occurs through two waves:early stage cell division and late stage post-mitotic expansion (Huang and Irish, 2016). Coordination of cell division and expansion in petal development is critical for the regulation of cell number and size that determine the morphology of the mature petal. In this Research Topic, several articles focus on studies related to this theme. For example, Galipot et al. investigate the growth of nectariferous petals in N. damascena and identify the allometric nature of petal shape and size dynamics. They also find that the patterning of petal shape is primarily determined by the activities of cell proliferation, while the change of petal size is mainly driven by the dynamics of cell expansion. These data uncover an important cellular mechanism that sculpts the elaborate N. damascena petal. Furthermore, in a study of another ornamental species, Gerbera hybrida (Asteraceae), Lin et al. characterize two 14-3-3 protein-coding genes that mediate brassinosteroid-induced ray petal elongation. They find that these two 14-3-3 genes play a key role in controling petal growth by promoting petal cell elongation.
The timing of transition from cell proliferation to expansion is a key control point that determines mature organ morphology. Two transcription factors, RABBIT EARS (RBE) and TCP5, play vital roles in the regulation of cell proliferation-to-expansion transition in the Arabidopsis petal (Huang and Irish, 2015). In this Research Topic, Huang et al. propose a model that RBE may repress TCP5 by recruiting epigenetic modifiers to induce chromatin-mediated silencing at the TCP5 locus, which adds a new layer of epigenetic regulation to the RBE/TCP5-mediated transcriptional control of cell proliferation-to-expansion transition in petal morphogenesis.
Regulation of Petal Cell Maturation
Following the transition from cell division to expansion, another critical factor that controls petal growth is the degree of expansion and final cell shape. Zhang and Zhang show that genome size of Paphiopedilum (Orchidaceae) species is negatively correlated with labellum epidermal cell size, and positively correlated with the size of leaf epidermal cells, which suggests that genome size may be a strong predictor of cell size. Moreover, Cavallini-Speisser et al. write a review to summarize the major cell types in the petal and their functions. They also conclude the actions of the key regulators of petal development in the specification of different cell types in the petal. This collection of information provides us with a good resource for further studying the genetic control of petal organogenesis at the cellular level.
Relationship Between Petal Development and Pollination
Variation in petal development that results in the diversity of petal morphologies has important implications in attracting specific pollinators for different plant species (Fenster et al., 2004; Stuurman et al., 2004). One such relationship between petal development and pollination is investigated by Hsu and Kuo, who analyze the nectar guide patterns in Ligeriinae (Gesneriaceae) by examining the petal contours and vasculatures. They identify four modes of nectar guide patterns and show that two of the four modes, distal and proximal, have the strongest associations with pollination types. These results are helpful for further understanding the diversity of nectar guide patterns and its relationship with plant-pollinator interaction in Ligeriinae.
Summary
The diverse and interconnected subjects presented in this Research Topic provide comprehensive information about ongoing studies of petal development and functions. These studies also raise some interesting questions worthy of future investigation. For example, what role do epigenetic mechanisms play in the transcriptional regulation of petal growth? How is variation in growth patterns during petal development, which has been shown in this topic to be critical for determining petal morphology, regulated by temporal- and spatial-specific factors? It is worth noting that we include two articles that are not directly related with petal development in this topic: one uses tissue-specific analyses to investigate the interaction between tomato and a parasitic plant Cuscuta campestris (Jhu et al.); while the other assesses the miRNA profiles in Mepiquat chloride-mediated inhibition of internode elongation in cotton (Wang et al.). The strategies and results of these two studies, such as the tissue-specific approaches and the roles of the epigenetic regulator miRNAs, may shed light on the above questions. By addressing these critical questions, we hope to have a more in-depth dissection of the complex network that controls petal growth, which may serve as the basis for a better understanding of plant organ development in the future.
Author Contributions
TH, EK, and DL were contributed to the writing of this editorial. All authors approved it for publication.
Funding
Our work on petal organogenesis has been supported by grants from the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2021A1515011035) and Guangdong Special Support Program for Young Talents in Innovation Research of Science and Technology (2019TQ05N940) to TH, and NSF IOS- 1456217 to EK.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
The guest editors would like to acknowledge all contributors to this Research Topic.
References
Fenster, C. B., Armbruster, W. S., Wilson, P., Dudash, M. R., and Thomson, J. D. (2004). Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35, 375–403. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132347
Huang, T., and Irish, V. F. (2015). Temporal control of plant organ growth by TCP transcription factors. Curr. Biol. 25, 1765–1770. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.024
Huang, T., and Irish, V. F. (2016). Gene networks controlling petal organogenesis. J. Exp. Bot. 67, 61–68. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv444
Irish, V. F.. (2008). The Arabidopsis petal: a model for plant organogenesis. Trends Plant Sci. 13, 430–436. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.05.006
Stuurman, J., Hoballah, M. E., Broger, L., Moore, J., Basten, C., and Kuhlemeier, C. (2004). Dissection of floral pollination syndromes in Petunia. Genetics 168, 1585–1599. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.031138
Keywords: petal organogenesis, cell proliferation and expansion, cell type specification, plant-pollinator interaction, plant evolution
Citation: Huang T, Kramer EM and Lin D (2022) Editorial: Petal Development: From Cell Biology to EvoDevo. Front. Plant Sci. 13:951442. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.951442
Received: 24 May 2022; Accepted: 31 May 2022;
Published: 15 June 2022.
Edited and reviewed by: Jill Christine Preston, University of Vermont, United States
Copyright © 2022 Huang, Kramer and Lin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Tengbo Huang, dGVuZ2JvaHVhbmcmI3gwMDA0MDtzenUuZWR1LmNu; Elena M. Kramer, ZWtyYW1lciYjeDAwMDQwO29lYi5oYXJ2YXJkLmVkdQ==; Deshu Lin, ZGVzaHUubGluJiN4MDAwNDA7ZmFmdS5lZHUuY24=