Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 22 July 2022
Sec. Plant Breeding

The mungbean VrP locus encoding MYB90, an R2R3-type MYB protein, regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis

  • 1Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Horticultural Crop Genetic Improvement, Institute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, China
  • 2Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen, Thailand

Anthocyanins are water-soluble pigments present in several tissues/parts of plants. The pigments provide color and are wildly known for health benefits for human, insect attraction for plant pollination, and stress resistance in plants. Anthocyanin content variations in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] were first noticed a long time ago, but the genetic mechanism controlling the anthocyanins in mungbean remains unknown. An F2 population derived from the cross between purple-hypocotyl (V2709) and green-hypocotyl (Sulv1) mungbeans was used to map the VrP locus controlling purple hypocotyl. The VrP locus was mapped to a 78.9-kb region on chromosome 4. Sequence comparison and gene expression analysis identified an R2R3-MYB gene VrMYB90 as the candidate gene for the VrP locus. Haplotype analysis using 124 mungbean accessions suggested that 10 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in exon 3 may lead to an abolished expression of VrMYB90 and an absence of anthocyanin accumulation in the hypocotyl of Sulv1 and KPS2. The overexpression of VrMYB90 in mungbean hairy root, tobacco leaf, and Arabidopsis resulted in anthocyanin accumulation (purple color). Gene expression analysis demonstrated that VrMYB90 regulated anthocyanin accumulation in the hypocotyl, stem, petiole, and flowers, and the expression was sensitive to light. VrMYB90 protein may upregulate VrDFR encoding dihydroflavonol 4-reductase at the late biosynthesis step of anthocyanins in mungbeans. These results suggest that VrMYB90 is the dominator in the spatiotemporal regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis. Our results provide insight into the biosynthesis mechanism of anthocyanin and a theoretical basis for breeding mungbeans.

Introduction

Anthocyanins, a flavonoid, are natural water-soluble pigments abundant in plants that endow tissues and organs with distinctive colors (Glover and Martin, 2012). The color of flowers, leaves, seeds, and fruits plays an important role in the specificity of pollinators and predators (Bradshaw and Schemske, 2003; Carlson and Holsinger, 2013; Esfeld et al., 2018). Due to their high antioxidant activity, anthocyanins can enhance the tolerance and resistance of plants to biotic and abiotic stresses, such as pathogens, ultraviolet B radiation, chilling, drought, and salinity by scavenging excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS; Nakabayashi et al., 2014; Asem et al., 2015; Matus, 2016; Li et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017; Xu and Rothstein, 2018; Bai et al., 2020; Sicilia et al., 2020). Additionally, anthocyanins show tremendous potential benefits for human and livestock health by reducing adverse health risks, especially from chronic diseases and aging (Blesso, 2019; Tena et al., 2020). These biochemical characteristics mean that anthocyanins play a significant role during crop breeding (Allan and Espley, 2018; Chaves-Silva et al., 2018) and plant evolution (Wessinger and Rausher, 2012; Davies et al., 2020; Saigo et al., 2020; Berardi et al., 2021).

Anthocyanins are secondary metabolism products produced by the flavonoid branch of the phenylpropanoid pathway. These compounds are synthesized in the cytosol and transported into the vacuole for storage. The biosynthesis of anthocyanins and regulatory pathways is well elucidated in model plant species, including Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh., Petunia hybrida, Antirrhinum majus L., and Medicago truncatula Gaertn. (Carletti et al., 2013; Albert et al., 2014; Bulgakov et al., 2017). In recent years, several key genes involved in the mechanical steps of the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway have been identified in several horticultural plants (Liu et al., 2017, 2020; Yao et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2019; Zhong et al., 2020). Collectively, anthocyanin biosynthesis genes are simply divided into early biosynthesis genes (EBGs) and late biosynthesis genes (LBGs). The EBGs encoded different enzymes, including chalcone synthase (CHS), chalcone isomerase (CHI), flavanone 3-hydroxylase, and 3′-hydroxylase (F3H and F3′H), which catalyzes the production of dihydroflavonols, dihydroquercetin, or dihydromyricetin as the precursor substrates for late anthocyanin synthesis, while the LBGs mainly encoded enzymes of dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (DFR), leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase/anthocyanidin synthase (LDOX/ANS), and UDP-glucose: flavonoid 3-O-glucosyltransferase (UFGT) that converted flavononols to anthocyanin (Jaakola, 2013; Chaves-Silva et al., 2018). Anthocyanins are transported and sequestrated into the vacuole as coalescences through multidrug and toxic extrusion (MATE) or ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters (Zhao and Dixon, 2010; Zhao et al., 2011).

In plants, the expression of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes is transcriptionally coordinated by an MYB-bHLH-WD40 (MBW) ternary complex. An R2R3-MYB transcription factor (TF) is the core activator that upregulates the expression of EBGs and LBGs by binding to the cis-elements on their promoters (Allan and Espley, 2018). In strawberry (Fragaria spp.), an R2R3 MYB member, MYB10 is considered to be the major gene stimulating the biosynthetic genes of anthocyanins (Medina-Puche et al., 2014). In purple carrot (Daucus carota L.), a root-specifically expressed R2R3-MYB gene, DcMYB113, activates several structural genes and conditions anthocyanin biosynthesis in taproots (Xu et al., 2020). In wild European bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.), three MYB genes, VmMYBA1, VmMYBPA1.1, and VmMYBPA2.2, were characterized as co-regulating anthocyanin accumulation in ripening fruits (Karppinen et al., 2021). In grape (Vitis vinifera L.), the VvMYBA1 gene controls the peel color in the purple grape variety “Cabernet” (Kobayashi et al., 2004). Kobayashi et al. (2004) demonstrated that when a transposon was inserted into the promoter of VvMYBA1, it inhibited the expression of this gene and resulted in a white peel, forming the white grape variety “Chardonnay.” However, when the inserted site caused a rearrangement of the promoter sequence in the variety “Ruby Okuyama,” the expression of Vvmyba1 was partially restored and led to the pink-peel phenotype.

bHLH TFs are co-activators of MYBs that enhance the transcriptional ability of MYB TFs. The co-expression of bHLH and MYB genes can significantly determine anthocyanin production in transgenic plants (Wang et al., 2019). Some studies propose that bHLHs can bind to the promoters of some key enzyme genes (Zhu et al., 2015; Li et al., 2020; Tao et al., 2020). WD40 was first discovered to be involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis (Walker et al., 1999), and its homologs have been characterized in many other species. It works as a scaffold in the MBW heterotrimer, and the interaction of WD40 with bHLH can enhance the transcriptional activation ability of MYB TFs (Xu et al., 2013). Repression or mutations in either of the regulatory genes will lead to a lack of pigmentation (Kobayashi et al., 2004; Schwinn et al., 2006; Gillman et al., 2011; Zhi et al., 2020; Meng et al., 2021; Qin et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2021).

Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) is an economic and versatile legume crop of Asia and is now gaining popularity in Australia, Africa, and United States. Dry seeds of mungbean are consumed in various ways and can be processed into sprouts, noodles, protein concentrates and isolates, and starches (Nair and Schreinemachers, 2020). There are two color types of the hypocotyl in mungbean, namely, green and purple. The hypocotyl color is often used as a marker by farmers to identify cultivar purity and plant breeders to identify hybrids and selection. In addition, the hypocotyl color is also an important criterion in mungbean breeding. For example, in Thailand, breeders always select mungbean plants/lines with green hypocotyls as the trait affects the quality (color) of the mungbean sprouts. Genetic studies clearly revealed that the trait is controlled by a single locus and the purple hypocotyl is dominant (Sen and Ghosh, 1959; Swindell and Poehlman, 1978; Pandey et al., 1989). Sen and Ghosh (1959) designated locus “P” for purple-colored hypocotyl. However, the physical location and molecular basis of the locus P have not yet been investigated. Considering the nutritive values of mungbean and the benefits of anthocyanins, it is worthwhile to improve our understanding of the regulatory mechanism of anthocyanin biosynthesis in mungbean.

In this study, we reported map-based cloning and molecular characterization of the “VrP” locus controlling the purple hypocotyl color in mungbean. We showed that an R2R3-MYB gene, designated “VrMYB90,” is the candidate gene at the VrP locus. The transcript of VrMYB90 is abolished in green-hypocotyl mungbean accessions, leading to the loss of purple pigmentation. The expression level of VrMYB90 was tightly related to the anthocyanin content and was sensitive to light. Sequencing of VrMYB90 in 124 mungbean accessions revealed that 10 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in exon 3 of this gene were associated with green hypocotyl color. Results from this study provide insight into the anthocyanin biosynthesis mechanism and a theoretical basis for the breeding of mungbean.

Materials and methods

Mapping population

An F2 population comprising 849 individuals derived from a cross between “V2709” (purple hypocotyl) and “Sulv1” (green hypocotyl) was used for gene mapping of the VrP gene. The F2 population together with their parents was planted in growth chambers with a 14/10 h photoperiod, 250 μE m–2 s–1 light intensity, 28°C daytime temperature, and 25°C nighttime temperature. A set of 124 mungbean accessions (Supplementary Table 1) was used to investigate the association between VrP sequence variations and hypocotyl colors.

Anthocyanin quantification

An amount of 50 mg of different mungbean or Arabidopsis tissue samples were ground into powder in liquid nitrogen, followed by soaking in 1 ml of 1% (v/v) HCl/methanol in the dark for 12 h. The mixture solution was centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min. The supernatant was measured for light absorption at 530 and 657 nm by using an ultraviolet spectrophotometer UV-7500 (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The total anthocyanin content was calculated as described previously (Weiss and Halevy, 1989). The quantification was replicated five times. In the mungbean, the quantification was done for only Sulv1, V2709, and Guilv1.

Tissue sectioning

Sections of 1 cm of the hypocotyl of a 7-day-old seedling of V2709 and Sulv1 were obtained and embedded in 3% agarose. The sections were made using a double-edge razor blade by hand. Ten sections were placed on a slide with dH2O. Images were observed and taken under Olympus BX51 light microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

Mapping of the VrP locus

The seedlings of the F2 mapping population were recorded for hypocotyl color (purple or green) 2 weeks after sowing, and genomic DNA was extracted from each F2 progeny. DNA extraction, primer design, and DNA marker genotyping were the same as described in our previous study (Lin et al., 2020). Briefly, the DNA was extracted using a modified CTAB method. Primers for simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and Insertions/Deletions (InDels; Supplementary Table 2) were designed from all the chromosomes of the mungbean reference sequence “VC1973A” (Kang et al., 2014). In the case of the InDel markers, primers were developed by comparing sequences of Sulv1 (Yan et al., 2020) with the reference sequence. The SSR and InDel markers were screened for polymorphism between the parents. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) contained 20 ng of DNA template, 10 mM Tris–HCl, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM dNTP, 0.2 mM mixed primers, and 0.5 U Taq DNA polymerase. The PCR program consisted of a denaturation step (94°C/5 min), followed by 33 cycles of 94°C/30 s, 55°C/30 s, and 72°C/60 s, and a final extension step of 72°C/5 min. The PCR products were electrophoresed using 8% polyacrylamide gels and DNA bands were visualized by silver staining.

In this study, the green hypocotyl was a recessive trait, thus we considered it the mutant type, while the purple hypocotyl was considered the wild type, thus the hypocotyl color was used as a phenotypic marker. In the F2 population, the phenotypic marker, together with 17 molecular markers, including 8 SSR markers and 9 InDel markers (Supplementary Table 2), was used to construct linkage map. The linkage map was constructed using the QTL IciMapping 4.2 software (Meng et al., 2015). A logarithm of odds (LOD) value of 3.0 was used for grouping the markers. Markers were ordered using a recombination counting and ordering algorithm (RECORD) function (van Os et al., 2005). The genetic map distance was calculated using Kosambi’s mapping function (Kosambi, 1944).

Fine mapping of the VrP locus and candidate gene identification

To finely map the VrP locus, we initially identified markers associated with this locus by analyzing 10 F2 mutant-type (green hypocotyl) individuals using the markers showing polymorphism between their parents (Supplementary Table 2). Markers revealing the same homozygous genotype between all the 10 individuals and their green-hypocotyl parents indicated linkage between the markers and the VrP locus. All the markers identifying linkage with the VrP locus were used to genotype the whole F2 population. Then, the markers were mapped to the mungbean reference genome sequence (Kang et al., 2014), and the location of VrP was identified by examining marker recombination events in the F2 population.

Genes located between markers flanking the VrP locus were identified as candidate genes using the mungbean reference genome sequence annotated by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI Vigna radiata Annotation Release 101)1.

Phylogenetic analysis

We determined the phylogeny of VrMYB90. Protein sequences from azuki bean [Vigna angularis (Ohwi) Ohwi and Ohashi], cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.], soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.), petunia (Petunia bajeensis T. Ando and Hashim), barrel medic (Medicago truncatula Gaertn.), lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.), kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis A. Chev), apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.), and Arabidopsis, matching that of VrMYB90, were identified using the BLASTP algorithm and were downloaded from GenBank. A rooted phylogenetic tree was constructed from the sequences using the neighbor-joining method using the MEGA 10.0 software (Kumar et al., 2018). The robustness of the phylogeny was tested by bootstrapping (1,000 replicates) with the DNAMAN5.2 software (Lynnon Biosoft Corp., Quebec City, QC, Canada).

Gene sequencing

Eight open-reading frames (ORFs)/genes were identified in a genomic region covering the VrP locus (Supplementary Table 3). Coding sequences (CDS) of the eight ORFs in V2709 and Sulv1 were sequenced. In addition, the full ORF of the VrMYB90 and its 2.56-kb promoter region in V2709, Sulv1, Guilv1 (purple hypocotyl), and KPS2 (green hypocotyl) were sequenced. PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing were performed as per the methods described by Yun et al. (2002). In brief, PCR was conducted using KOD-plus DNA polymerase (Toyobo, Shanghai, China). DNA bands with the expected size were purified using (E.Z.N.A.)® Gel Extraction Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, United States) and then sequenced using an ABI 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, CA, United States) by TSINGKE Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China).

Plasmid construction

The coding region without the termination codon of VrMYB90 from Guilv1 was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and recombined into the vector pCAMBIA1305.1-GFP. The constructed 35S::VrMYB90-GFP was used in the following experiments.

Transient expression in Nicotiana benthamiana leaf

Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 containing the construct 35S::VrMYB90 was infiltrated into the 6-week-old tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana L.) leaf for transient transformation. The transient expression assay was performed as previously described (Yoo et al., 2007). To observe the color change, the infiltrated plants were placed in an artificial illumination incubator for 4–5 days and photographed using a camera.

Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated hairy-root transformation

Vector 35S::VrMYB90 was introduced into the Agrobacterium rhizogenes K599 strain. Notably, 1-week-old seedlings of Guilv1 were used as receptors. The hairy root transformation was performed as previously described (Kereszt et al., 2007).

Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis

The plasmid was transformed into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA105 strain, and an A. thaliana transformation was performed using the floral dipping method as described previously (Clough and Bent, 1998). The seeds of transgenic plants were selected on 1/2 Murashige and Skoog media containing 30 μg/ml hygromycin.

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted using RNAprep Pure Plant Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNAs from hypocotyls of various mungbean varieties were used for expression analysis of VrMYB90. The RNAs from different tissues of Guilv1 were used for the expression pattern investigation of VrMYB90. The RNAs from hypocotyls of Guilv1 and transgenic Arabidopsis lines were used for expression analysis of anthocyanin-related genes by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). First-strand cDNA was synthesized using the Goldenstar® RT6 cDNA Synthesis Kit (Tsingke, Beijing, China). VrActin3 (LOC106757568) gene was used as an endogenous control. Primers used for the qRT-PCR are listed in Supplementary Table 2. The qRT-PCR was carried out according to Lin et al. (2020). The 2–ΔΔCT method was used to calculate relative levels of gene expression.

Statistical analysis

All values and data points presented were means ± standard deviation (SD). All statistically significant difference tests in this study were conducted using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test.

Results

Microscopic observation and the genetics of hypocotyl color

Microscopic observation showed that anthocyanins were accumulated in the second epidermal cell layer that gave rise to a purplish hypocotyl in V2709, and no anthocyanin accumulation was observed in the hypocotyl of Sulv1 (Figures 1A–D). Quantification of anthocyanins revealed that the total anthocyanin contents in the hypocotyl of V2709 were approximately eight times higher than that of Sulv1 (Figure 1E). A color investigation of the hypocotyl in the F2 population showed that the segregation ratio of purple individuals to green individuals was consistently 3:1 (χ2 = 0.55 < χ2 0.05 = 3.84, P = 0.46). This result was in line with previous studies (Swindell and Poehlman, 1978; Pandey et al., 1989) and indicated that the purple hypocotyl color is a dominant trait controlled by a single locus, designated as VrP.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Phenotypes of purple- and green-hypocotyl parental genotypes. (A) Green-hypocotyl genotype (Sulv1) and purple-hypocotyl genotype (V2709). (B) Transverse section of V2709 hypocotyl. (C) Transverse section of Sulv1 hypocotyl. (D) Fresh extracts from hypocotyls of V2709 and Sulv1. (E) Total anthocyanin contents of V2709 and Sulv1 hypocotyls. **Indicates a significant difference by Student’s t-test (P < 0.01).

Mapping of the VrP locus and identification of the candidate gene

Linkage analysis using 132 F2 plants mapped the VrP locus to the region between markers PS36 and LG4-15 at a genetic distance of 3.0 and 0.76 cM, respectively (Figure 2A). With all the plants in the population (849 plants) and more markers, the location of the VrP locus was precisely mapped between markers WS-28 and WS-43 on chromosome 4 of the mungbean reference genome (Figure 2B).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Map-based cloning of VrP. (A) Linkage map showing the location of VrP. The number below indicates the marker position on the linkage map in centimorgan (cM) units, and n indicates the population size for linkage map construction. (B) The physical location of the VrP gene on chromosome 4 of mungbean. Molecular markers are labeled below the filled bars, arrows represent predicted genes, and n indicates the population size for mapping. (C) Expression analysis of ORFs in the mapping region of VrP from hypocotyls of V2709 and Sulv1. * and ** indicate a significant difference by Student’s t-test at P = 0.05 and P = 0.01, respectively, while ns indicates a non-significant difference.

With more polymorphemic markers explored in the population, the VrP locus was narrowed down to a 78.9-kb region, delimited by SSR markers WS-2 and WS-16 (Figure 2B). Based on gene annotation of the mungbean reference sequence by NCBI, there were eight open reading frames (ORFs) predicted in this 78.9-kb region (Figure 2B and Supplementary Table 3). Sequencing and alignment of the CDS of all the eight ORFs between Sulv1 and V2709 revealed polymorphism only in the ORF3.

A qRT-PCR experiment showed that ORF1 and ORF2 were almost undetectable in both accessions; ORF5, 6, and 8 have a slight expression difference in the hypocotyls of Sulv1 and V2709; ORF7 was expressed significantly higher in Sulv1 than in V2709, while ORF3 was highly expressed in the hypocotyl of V2709 and undetectable in that of Sulv1 (Figure 2C). According to NCBI annotation, ORF3 was composed of three exons with a full CDS of 702 bp in length and encoded an R2R3-MYB transcription factor, VrMYB90. The ORF3 was named “VrMYB90.” The VrMYB90 is highly homologous to AtMYB90 (AtPAP2) in Arabidopsis (Zimmermann et al., 2004) and AcMYB1 in Actinidia chinensis Planch (Wang et al., 2019; Supplementary Figure 1B), which forms the MBW complex and promotes the biosynthesis of anthocyanins. Thus, VrMYB90 was selected as the candidate gene for the VrP locus.

Since the transcript of VrMYB90 was almost undetectable in the hypocotyl of Sulv1 (Figure 2C), we then investigated the expression level of VrMYB90 in four green- and four purple-hypocotyl mungbean cultivars. The expression of VrMYB90 was nearly nil in all the green-hypocotyl mungbean accessions (KPS1, CN60, CN84, and V2817), but very high in all the accessions with purple hypocotyls (Jilv7, Guilv1, NM10-12, and KUML8) (Figure 3A). These results indicate that the altered expression of VrMYB90 may be responsible for the variation in the anthocyanin content of hypocotyl in mungbeans.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Expression and sequence analysis of VrMYB90. (A) Expression of VrMYB90 in eight mungbean accessions; KPS1, CN60, CN84, and V2817 with green hypocotyls Jilv7, V4718, NM, and KUML8 with purple hypocotyls. The expression of VrMYB90 in Jilv7 was set as control. (B) Multiple sequence alignment of VrMYB90 between purple- and green-hypocotyl mungbeans. V2709 and Guilv1 have purple hypocotyls, while Sulv1 and KPS2 have green hypocotyls. Exons are identified by colored underlines. **Indicates a significant difference by Student’s t-test (P < 0.01).

Sequence comparison of VrMYB90

To explain the difference in the expression of VrMYB90, amplified products of the genomic sequence (ATG to TAA) and a 2.56-kb promoter region of VrMYB90 in four mungbean accessions were sequenced. Sequence alignment revealed numerous SNPs and InDels in the promoter region of the four mungbeans (Supplementary Figure 1A); however, none of those polymorphisms was associated with the phenotype. VrMYB90 from Sulv1 was the same as the reference sequence (VC1973A; green hypocotyl). VrMYB90 from KPS2 had the same exonic sequence as Sulv1 with the only difference between them being TA repeats in intron 2 (Figure 3B). Compared with Sulv1, 21 SNPs and a 70-bp deletion existed in VrMYB90 coding region of V2709, while 13 SNPs and a 42-bp insertion were found in that of Guilv1 (Figure 3B). Among these nucleotide differences, the 13 SNPs in exon 3 were unique in both V2709 and Guilv1. These results suggest that the 13 nucleotide differences in exon 3 of VrMYB90 are associated with hypocotyl colors in mungbean.

Functional analysis of VrMYB90

To confirm that VrMYB90 has a similar function as AtMYB90 in the regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis, we overexpressed the CDS of VrMYB90 from V2709 in different systems. In tobacco leaf, the transient expression of VrMYB90 led to anthocyanin accumulation in the infection position, while the part injected with an empty 35S::GFP vector showed no color change (Figure 4A). In the mungbean hairy-root transgenic system, ectopic expression of VrMYB90 induced anthocyanin accumulation, resulting in a dark purple root, while the mungbean injected by K599 carrying the 35S::GFP empty vector grew a white root (Figures 4B,C).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Functional validation of VrMYB90. (A) Color changes induced by transient expression of 35S::VrMYB90 in N. tabacum leaves (right) at 5 days after infiltration. 35S::GFP was used as a negative control (left). Dotted circles indicate infiltrated positions. (B) Transient expression of 35S::VrMYB90 induces color changes in mungbean hairy roots. 35S::GFP was used as a negative control. (C) Fresh extracts from the hairy root in (B). (D–F) Color changes induced by overexpression of 35S::VrMYB90 in leaf (D), stem (E), and seeds (F) of A. thaliana. (G) The anthocyanin content in different tissues of transgenic A. thaliana. **Indicates a significant difference by Student’s t-test (P < 0.01).

After functional verification in transient expression systems, the heterologous expression of VrMYB90 in Arabidopsis was carried out to determine its function in a stable genetic transformation system. The results show that the T2-positive transgenic lines exhibited purple leaves, purple stems, and dark brown seeds in the T2 generation (Figures 4D–G). These results confirm that VrMYB90 promotes anthocyanin accumulation in different transgenic plants.

The correlation Between VrMYB90 haplotypes and hypocotyl colors in 124 mungbean accessions

Our sequencing results of VrMYB90 from four parental mungbeans suggested that 13 SNPs in exon 3 were associated with the expression levels (Figures 3A,B). To corroborate the correlation between hypocotyl color and VrMYB90, we analyzed CDS variations of VrMYB90 (Figure 5A) in 124 mungbean accessions by Sanger sequencing. Phenotypic analysis of these 124 varieties showed that 40 accessions (32.23%) possessed green hypocotyl and 84 accessions (63.07%) possessed purple hypocotyl (Supplementary Table 1).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Haplotype analysis of VrMYB90 in a panel of 124 mungbean accessions. (A) Coding sequence (CDS) structure of VrMYB90. (B) Five haplotypes of VrMYB90 discovered in 124 mungbean accessions. Nucleotides are labeled with colors and deletions are indicated by dashed lines. (C) Phylogenic tree of five haplotypes of VrMYB90 constructed by the neighbor-joining method.

The 124 accessions were genotypically classified into five groups of haplotypes based on natural variations, including 21 SNPs and one 3-bp InDel (Figure 5B). All the accessions showing green hypocotyls shared the same haplotype, Hap1, while the accessions displaying purple hypocotyls belonged to either haplotypes Hap2, Hap3, Hap4, or Hap5 (Figure 5C). Among the four haplotypes of purple hypocotyl accessions, Hap3 was the most prevalent haplotype at a frequency of 70.16%, while the haplotypes Hap2, Hap3, and Hap4 were rare, with each haplotype having only one accession. Comparing the Hap1 with other Haps revealed 10 SNPs in exon 3 (positions 456, 564, 573, 574, 603, 649, 657, 661, 666, and 683) associated with the phenotype (Figure 5B). Based on these results, we deduced that these ten SNPs cause the repression of the VrMYB90 gene.

Expression analysis of VrMYB90

Based on color appearance, we noticed differences in anthocyanin accumulation in different mungbean organs. Anthocyanin accumulation was observed in the hypocotyl, stem, petiole, and mature flower, while a few anthocyanins were accumulated in non-purple organs such as the root, leaf, pod, and seed (Figures 6A–G). qRT-PCR analysis revealed that VrMYB90 showed a great expression level in the hypocotyl and petiole, a low expression level in the stem and flower, and no expression in the leaf and root (Figure 6I). In addition, the expression level appeared to be positively correlated with the anthocyanin content; both the expression level and anthocyanin content were highest in the hypocotyl, followed by the stem and petiole, respectively (Figures 6H,I). Taken together, these results show that VrMYB90 controls anthocyanin biosynthesis in different organs/tissues, except for the seeds and roots, and the expression level is tightly correlated with a purple color appearance in mungbean.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Expression patterns of VrMYB90 in different tissues/parts of mungbean. (A–G) Color observation of root (A), stem (B), leaf (C), petiole (D), mature flower (E), young seed (F), and young pod (G) of mungbean cultivar Guilv1. (H) Fresh extracts from different tissues of Guilv1. (I) The expression level of VrMYB90 from different tissues/parts of Guilv1. The expression of VrMYB90 in petiole was set as one.

Pigment accumulation is sensitive to environmental factors, such as light, temperature, and drought, and the anthocyanin content varies greatly depending on the climate and external stresses (Yan et al., 2021). In this study, we observed that the anthocyanin completely disappeared when mungbeans were grown in the dark (Supplementary Figure 2A), and the difference in expression of VrMYB90 was greatly reduced in the dark (Supplementary Figure 2B). However, when the mungbeans were transferred and exposed to light, VrMYB90 started to express after 2 h of light exposure, and subsequently, anthocyanin accumulation appeared on the surface of the hypocotyl. The expression level was increased constantly for hours and maintained at a high level (Supplementary Figure 2C). These results show that VrMYB90 was expressed in several organs of mungbean and was sensitive to light treatment, suggesting that the expression of VrMYB90 is regulated spatiotemporally.

Expression analysis of anthocyanin-related genes

Expression analysis demonstrated that VrMYB90 was expressed at a substantially higher level in the hypocotyl than in other organs (Figure 6I). Thus, the RNA samples from the hypocotyl of Guilv1 were prepared for expression analysis of the structural genes. BLAST against the mungbean reference genome (Kang et al., 2014) showed that there are multiple genes encoding different structural genes involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis, including VrCHI (LOC106761096 and LOC106762868), VrF3H (LOC106769061 and LOC106763868), VrF5′H (LOC106775152 and LOC106767100), VrDFR (LOC106763833 and LOC106773575), VrANS (LOC106757264, LOC106773578, LOC106771626, and LOC106779041), VrLDOX (LOC106777796 and LOC106776917), and VrUFGT (LOC106778549, LOC106778555, LOC106778578, LOC106779200, and LOC106780203). The expression analysis of these genes demonstrated that most of the genes had no significant difference in expression, while an F3′H gene (LOC106769061), a DFR gene (LOC106763833), two LDOX genes (LOC106777796 and LOC106776917), and a UFGT gene (LOC106779200) showed significantly higher expression in Guilv1 than in Sulv1 (Figures 7A,B). F3′H belongs to the EBG group, while DFR, LDOX, and UFGT belong to the LBG group. Among these genes, VrDFR-1 (LOC106763833) and VrLDOX-1 (LOC106777796) had a notable expression difference. DFR catalyzes the conversion of dihydroflavonols to leucoanthocyanidins (Meng et al., 2021), and LDOX catalyzes the conversion of leucoanthocyanidins into anthocyanidins (Abrahams et al., 2003), both of which are crucial steps in the biosynthesis of anthocyanins. Additionally, the expression of structural genes in transgenic Arabidopsis leaves was measured. The results show that all the structural genes were upregulated in T3-positive VrMYB90 overexpression lines, compared with wild-type Arabidopsis, and AtDFR exhibited the largest expression difference (Figure 7C). These results indicate that VrMYB90 prefers to promote LBG genes in anthocyanin biosynthesis and that VrDFR-1 is the most probable target gene of VrMYB90.

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Expression analysis of anthocyanin synthesis genes. (A,B) Expression analysis of EBGs (A) and LBGs (B) in the hypocotyls of Guilv1 and Sulv1. The gene expression in Guilv1 was set as a control. (C) Expression analysis of anthocyanin synthesis-related genes in VrMYB90 over-expression Arabidopsis thaliana. The gene expression in wild type (Col-0) was set as a control. * and ** indicate a significant difference by Student’s t-test (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively).

Discussion

Determinant factors of anthocyanin biosynthesis in mungbean

Pigmentation in mungbean caused by anthocyanin accumulation was observed on the hypocotyls, stem, leaf rachis, petiole, and peduncle. Although the genetics of the coloration of the mungbean hypocotyls is simple, governed by a single dominant locus, VrP, and was reported more than six decades ago (Sen and Ghosh, 1959), the molecular basis of the gene underlying the VrP locus has never been identified and investigated. The main reason for this is the lack of reference genome information for mungbean. In this study, we exploited the draft genome sequence of mungbean and successfully identified the gene underlying the VrP locus.

In this study, we used an F2 population to map VrP to a 78.9-kb region on chromosome 4 (Figures 2A,B), and the gene VrMYB90 was isolated and determined to be the factor for anthocyanin accumulation in mungbean hypocotyl. VrMYB90 has high homology with AtMYB90 (PAP2) and AtMYB113 in amino acid sequences (Supplementary Figure 1B) that influenced the color of Arabidopsis (Borevitz et al., 2000; Zimmermann et al., 2004). In Sulv1 and other mungbean accessions with green hypocotyls, the transcript of VrMYB90 was almost abolished, which blocked the biosynthesis of anthocyanins (Figures 2C, 3A). The introduction of VrMYB90 into different plant systems, e.g., tobacco leaf, mungbean hairy root, and Arabidopsis, triggered the expression of structural genes in the anthocyanin synthesis pathway and promoted purple pigment accumulation (Figure 4). qPCR analysis indicated that VrMYB90 upregulates the expression of anthocyanin biosynthesis genes in Arabidopsis-positive lines (Figure 7C), which implies it has a similar role to AtMYB90. Moreover, our results indicated that VrMYB90 predominated in the anthocyanin metabolism pathway of mungbean, and the content of anthocyanin positively correlates with the expression level of VrMYB90 (Figure 6). Together, this study reveals that VrMYB90 on chromosome 4 is the determiner of anthocyanin synthesis in mungbean.

Ten single nucleotide polymorphisms in the coding sequences of VrMYB90 May cause pigment loss

Various nucleotide differences in MYB genes lead to function loss or expression silence and cause a lessened or complete absence of anthocyanin accumulation. A gypsy-like retrotransposon insertion in the promoter of Vvmyba1 inhibits the expression and turns off anthocyanin synthesis in fruit peels (Kobayashi et al., 2004). A 4-bp insertion in the first exon of RsMYB1 resulting in a frameshift mutation and premature termination of translation produced white radish cultivars (Kim et al., 2021). A 3.6–3.7 kb fragment insertion in the first intron of BrMYB2 caused the white-head trait of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L.) (He et al., 2020). In this study, sequencing of a 2.6-kb promoter of eight mungbean lines showed several differences; however, none of these uniquely belonged to purple-hypocotyl lines, and thus we believe that the variations in the promoter were not correlated with the expression change of VrMYB90. Meanwhile, sequencing the CDS of VrMYB90 revealed that ten SNPs in exon 3 were tightly related to phenotype (Figure 5). The haplotype analysis revealed that the ten SNPs existed in all green-hypocotyl mungbean accessions (Supplementary Table 1) and further supported that the nucleotide variations in exon 3 caused the disappearance of the VrMYB90 transcript. Mutations of exons may happen at the target of microRNA or methylation sites, which can lead to an expression change in genes: a non-synonymous SNP mutation in the third exon of CsCEN caused a significantly lower expression in shoot apexes and axillary buds in D226, which resulted in determinate growth (Njogu et al., 2020), and an SNP in the third exon of OsSPL14 perturbed the repression of OsmiR156, resulting in a strong expression of OsSPL14 in the shoot apex, generated an ideal plant architecture and enhanced grain yield (Jiao et al., 2010). However, the specific transcriptional regulation mechanism of the ten SNPs in VrMYB90 remains unknown.

Specific expression pattern of VrMYB90 in mungbean

The tissue expression specificity of MYB genes is common in different species. For example, AcMYB123 expressed in the inner pericarp of kiwifruit produced the red-fleshed variety “Hongyang” (Wang et al., 2019), while an R2R3 MYB gene DEEP PURPLE was uniquely expressed in the petal of Petunia exserta J.R. Stehm. and caused diminished red color (Berardi et al., 2021). In our study, measurement of the VrMYB90 transcript in different organs showed that this gene has different expression levels in different tissues, leading to different anthocyanin contents. Notably, VrMYB90 was undetectable in mungbean seeds. Noble et al. (2018) reported that anthocyanins induce the diversity of seed coat colors in mungbean and VrMYB113, which is highly homologous to VrMYB90 and may be a determinant gene controlling seed color. In contrast to this report, the results from our study suggest that the seed coat color of some black seed mungbean accessions may be governed by another MBW complex. This is supported by the limited expression of VrMYB90 in the seeds and the imperfect correlation between the hypocotyl color and the seed coat color in the 124 mungbean accessions (Supplementary Table 1); for example, Anhei2, a mungbean accession, expressed a green hypocotyl but a black seed coat. Altogether, we believe that a complex regulatory mechanism of anthocyanin production exists in mungbean.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.

Author contributions

YL, PS, and XC conceived and designed the study and wrote and revised the manuscript. PS supervised the study. YL, KL, JL, JC, and XY performed the gene mapping, sequencing, and transformation. YL conducted the microscopic observation, bioinformatics, and data analyses. XC and PS secured research funds. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFE0109100), China Agriculture Research System -Food Legumes (grant number CARS-08), Jiangsu Seed Industry Revitalization Project (grant number JBGS[2021]004), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (grant number BK20200282), and Office of National Higher Education Science Research and Innovation Policy Council, Thailand, via the Program Management Unit for Human Resources and Institutional Development, Research and Innovation (grant number B16F640185).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Heping Gu for the germplasm management used in this study.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.895634/full#supplementary-material

Footnotes

  1. ^ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/annotation_euk/Vigna_radiata/101

References

Albert, N. W., Davies, K. M., Lewis, D. H., Zhang, H., Montefiori, M., Brendolise, C., et al. (2014). A conserved network of transcriptional activators and repressors regulates anthocyanin pigmentation in eudicots. Plant Cell 26, 962–980.

Google Scholar

Allan, A. C., and Espley, R. V. (2018). MYBs drive novel consumer traits in fruits and vegetables. Trends Plant Sci. 23, 693–705. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.06.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Asem, I. D., Imotomba, R. K., Mazumder, P. B., and Laishram, J. M. (2015). Anthocyanin content in the black scented rice (Chakhao): its impact on human health and plant defense. Symbiosis 66, 47–54.

Google Scholar

Bai, Q. X., Duan, B. B., Ma, J. C., Fen, Y. N., Sun, S. J., Long, Q. M., et al. (2020). Coexpression of PalbHLH1 and PalMYB90 genes grom Populus alba enhances pathogen resistance in poplar by increasing the flavonoid content. Front. Plant Sci. 10:1772. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01772

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Berardi, A. E., Esfeld, K., Jaggi, L., Mandel, T., Cannarozzi, G. M., and Kuhlemeier, C. (2021). Complex evolution of novel red floral color in Petunia. Plant Cell 33, 2273–2295. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koab114

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Blesso, C. N. (2019). Dietary anthocyanins and human health. Nutrients 11:2107.

Google Scholar

Borevitz, J. O., Xia, Y., Blount, J., Dixon, R. A., and Lamb, C. (2000). Activation tagging identifies a conserved MYB regulator of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. Plant Cell 12, 2383–2394. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.12.2383

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bradshaw, H. D., and Schemske, D. W. (2003). Allele substitution at a flower colour locus produces a pollinator shift in monkeyflowers. Nature 426, 176–178. doi: 10.1038/nature02106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bulgakov, V. P., Avramenko, T. V., and Tsitsiashvili, G. S. (2017). Critical analysis of protein signaling networks involved in the regulation of plant secondary metabolism: focus on anthocyanins. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 37, 685–700. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2016.1141391

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carletti, G., Lucini, L., Busconi, M., Marocco, A., and Bernardi, J. (2013). Insight into the role of anthocyanin biosynthesis-related genes in Medicago truncatula mutants impaired in pigmentation in leaves. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 70, 123–132. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.05.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carlson, J. E., and Holsinger, K. E. (2013). Direct and indirect selection on floral pigmentation by pollinators and seed predators in a color polymorphic South African shrub. Oecologia 171, 905–919. doi: 10.1007/s00442-012-2453-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chaves-Silva, S., Santos, A. L. D., Chalfun-Junior, A., Zhao, J., Peres, L. E. P., and Benedito, V. A. (2018). Understanding the genetic regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in plants - tools for breeding purple varieties of fruits and vegetables. Phytochemistry 153, 11–27. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2018.05.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Davies, K. M., Jibran, R., Zhou, Y., Albert, N. W., Brummell, D. A., Jordan, B. R., et al. (2020). The evolution of flavonoid biosynthesis: a bryophyte perspective. Front. Plant Sci. 11:7. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Esfeld, K., Berardi, A. E., Moser, M., Bossolini, E., Freitas, L., and Kuhlemeier, C. (2018). Pseudogenization and resurrection of a speciation gene. Curr. Biol. 28, 3776–3786.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.10.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gillman, J. D., Tetlow, A., Lee, J. D., Shannon, J. G., and Bilyeu, K. (2011). Loss-of-function mutations affecting a specific Glycine max R2R3 MYB transcription factor result in brown hilum and brown seed coats. BMC Plant Biol. 11:155. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-155

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Glover, B. J., and Martin, C. (2012). Anthocyanins. Curr. Biol. 22, R147–R150. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

He, Q., Wu, J., Xue, Y., Zhao, W., Li, R., and Zhang, L. (2020). The novel gene BrMYB2, located on chromosome A07, with a short intron 1 controls the purple-head trait of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L.). Hortic. Res. 7:97. doi: 10.1038/s41438-020-0319-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jaakola, L. (2013). New insights into the regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in fruits. Trends Plant Sci. 18, 477–483.

Google Scholar

Jiao, Y., Wang, Y., Xue, D., Wang, J., Yan, M., Liu, G., et al. (2010). Regulation of OsSPL14 by OsmiR156 defines ideal plant architecture in rice. Nat. Genet. 42, 541–544. doi: 10.1038/ng.591

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kang, Y. J., Kim, S. K., Kim, M. Y., Lestari, P., Kim, K. H., Ha, B. K., et al. (2014). Genome sequence of mungbean and insights into evolution within Vigna species. Nat. Commun. 5:5443. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6443

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Karppinen, K., Lafferty, D. J., Albert, N. W., Mikkola, N., McGhie, T., Allan, A. C., et al. (2021). MYBA and MYBPA transcription factors co-regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis in blue-coloured berries. New Phytol. 232, 1350–1367. doi: 10.1111/nph.17669

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kereszt, A., Li, D., Indrasumunar, A., Nguyen, C. D., Nontachaiyapoom, S., Kinkema, M., et al. (2007). Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation of soybean to study root biology. Nat. Protoc. 2, 948–952.

Google Scholar

Kim, D. H., Lee, J., Rhee, J., Lee, J. Y., and Lim, S. H. (2021). Loss of the R2R3 MYB Transcription factor RsMYB1 shapes anthocyanin biosynthesis and accumulation in Raphanus sativus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22:10927. doi: 10.3390/ijms222010927

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kobayashi, S., Goto-Yamamoto, N., and Hirochika, H. (2004). Retrotransposon-induced mutations in grape skin color. Science 304:982. doi: 10.1126/science.1095011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kosambi, D. D. (1944). The estimation of map distances from recombination values. Ann. Eugen. 121, 172–175.

Google Scholar

Li, P., Li, Y. J., Zhang, F. J., Zhang, G. Z., Jiang, X. Y., Yu, H. M., et al. (2017). The Arabidopsis UDP-glycosyltransferases UGT79B2 and UGT79B3, contribute to cold, salt and drought stress tolerance via modulating anthocyanin accumulation. Plant J. 89, 85–103. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13324

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Xu, P., Chen, G., Wu, J., Liu, Z., and Lian, H. (2020). FvbHLH9 functions as a positive regulator of anthocyanin biosynthesis by forming a HY5-bHLH9 transcription complex in strawberry fruits. Plant Cell Physiol. 61, 826–837. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcaa010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, Y., Laosatit, K., Chen, J. B., Yuan, X. X., Wu, R. R., Amkul, K., et al. (2020). Mapping and functional characterization of stigma exposed 1, a DUF1005 gene controlling petal and stigma cells in mungbean (Vigna radiata). Front. Plant Sci. 11:575922. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.575922

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, J., Ai, X., Wang, Y., Lu, Q., Li, T., Wu, L., et al. (2020). Fine mapping of the Ca3GT gene controlling anthocyanin biosynthesis in mature unripe fruit of Capsicum annuum L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 133, 2729–2742. doi: 10.1007/s00122-020-03628-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, X. P., Gao, B. Z., Han, F. Q., Fang, Z. Y., Yang, L. M., Zhuang, M., et al. (2017). Genetics and fine mapping of a purple leaf gene, BoPr, in ornamental kale (Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala). BMC Genomics 18:230. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3613-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Matus, J. T. (2016). Transcriptomic and metabolomic networks in the grape berry illustrate that it takes more than flavonoids to fight against ultraviolet radiation. Front. Plant Sci. 7:1337. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01337

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Medina-Puche, L., Cumplido-Laso, G., Amil-Ruiz, F., Hoffmann, T., Ring, L., Rodriguez-Franco, A., et al. (2014). MYB10 plays a major role in the regulation of flavonoid/phenylpropanoid metabolism during ripening of Fragaria x ananassa fruits. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 401–417. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert377

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meng, L., Li, H., Zhang, L., and Wang, J. (2015). QTL IciMapping: Integrated software for genetic linkage map construction and quantitative trait locus mapping in biparental populations. Crop J. 3, 269–283. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2015.01.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meng, L., Qi, C., Wang, C., Wang, S., Zhou, C., Ren, Y., et al. (2021). Determinant factors and regulatory systems for anthocyanin biosynthesis in rice apiculi and stigmas. Rice 14:37. doi: 10.1186/s12284-021-00480-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nair, R., and Schreinemachers, P. (2020). “Global status and economic importance of mungbean”, in The Mungbean Genome, eds R. M. Nair, R. Schafleitner, and S. H. Lee (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 1–8. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-20008-4_1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nakabayashi, R., Yonekura-Sakakibara, K., Urano, K., Suzuki, M., Yamada, Y., Nishizawa, T., et al. (2014). Enhancement of oxidative and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis by overaccumulation of antioxidant flavonoids. Plant J. 77, 367–379. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12388

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Noble, T. J., Tao, Y., Mace, E. S., Williams, B., Jordan, D. R., Douglas, C. A., et al. (2018). Characterization of linkage disequilibrium and population structure in a mungbean diversity panel. Front. Plant Sci. 12:2102. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.02102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pandey, R. N., Pawar, S. E., Chintalwar, G. J., and Bhatia, C. R. (1989). Seed coat and hypocotyl pigments in greengram and blackgram. Proc. Indian Plant Sci. 99, 301–306.

Google Scholar

Qin, L. M., Sun, L., Wei, L., Yuan, J. R., Kong, F. F., Zhang, Y., et al. (2021). Maize SRO1e represses anthocyanin synthesis through regulating the MBW complex in response to abiotic stress. Plant J. 105, 1010–1025. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15083

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saigo, T., Wang, T., Watanabe, M., and Tohge, T. (2020). Diversity of anthocyanin and proanthocyanin biosynthesis in land plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 55, 93–99. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2020.04.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schwinn, K., Venail, J., Shang, Y., Mackay, S., Alm, V., Butelli, E., et al. (2006). A small family of MYB-regulatory genes controls floral pigmentation intensity and patterning in the genus Antirrhinum. Plant Cell 18, 831–851. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.039255

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sen, N. K., and Ghosh, A. K. (1959). Genetics studies in green gram. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed. 19, 210–227.

Google Scholar

Sicilia, A., Scialo, E., Puglisi, I., and Lo Piero, A. R. (2020). Anthocyanin biosynthesis and DNA methylation dynamics in dweet orange fruit [Citrus sinensis L. (Osbeck)] under cold stress. J. Agric. Food Chem. 68, 7024–7031.

Google Scholar

Swindell, R. E., and Poehlman, J. M. (1978). Inheritance of photoperiod response in mungbean (Vigna radiata [L.] Wilczek). Euphytica 27, 325–333.

Google Scholar

Tao, R. Y., Yu, W. J., Gao, Y. H., Ni, J. B., Yin, L., Zhang, X., et al. (2020). Light-Induced Basic/Helix-Loop-Helix64 enhances anthocyanin biosynthesis and undergoes constitutively photomorphogenic1-Mmediated degradation in Pear. Plant Physiol. 184, 1684–1701. doi: 10.1104/pp.20.01188

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tena, N., Martin, J., and Asuero, A. G. (2020). State of the art of anthocyanins : antioxidant activity, sources, bioavailability, and therapeutic effect in human health. Antioxidants (Basel) 9:451. doi: 10.3390/antiox9050451

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

van Os, H., Stam, P., Visser, R. G., and Van Eck, H. J. (2005). RECORD: a novel method for ordering loci on a genetic linkage map. Theor. Appl. Genet. 112, 30–40.

Google Scholar

Walker, A. R., Davison, P. A., Bolognesi-Winfield, A. C., James, C. M., Srinivasan, N., Blundell, T. L., et al. (1999). The Transparent Testa glabra1 locus, which regulates trichome differentiation and anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis, encodes a WD40 repeat protein. Plant Cell 11, 1337–1349. doi: 10.1105/tpc.11.7.1337

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, L., Ran, L., Hou, Y., Tian, Q., Li, C., Liu, R., et al. (2017). The transcription factor MYB115 contributes to the regulation of proanthocyanidin biosynthesis and enhances fungal resistance in poplar. New Phytol. 215, 351–367. doi: 10.1111/nph.14569

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, L., Tang, W., Hu, Y., Zhang, Y., Sun, J., Guo, X., et al. (2019). A MYB/bHLH complex regulates tissue-specific anthocyanin biosynthesis in the inner pericarp of red-centered kiwifruit Actinidia chinensis cv. Hongyang. Plant J. 99, 359–378. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14330

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weiss, D., and Halevy, A. H. (1989). Stamens and gibberellin in the regulation of corolla pigmentation and growth in Petunia hybrida. Planta 179, 89–96. doi: 10.1007/BF00395775

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wessinger, C. A., and Rausher, M. D. (2012). Lessons from flower colour evolution on targets of selection. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 5741–5749. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers267

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, W., Grain, D., Le Gourrierec, J., Harscoet, E., Berger, A., Jauvion, V., et al. (2013). Regulation of flavonoid biosynthesis involves an unexpected complex transcriptional regulation of TT8 expression, in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 198, 59–70. doi: 10.1111/nph.12142

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, Z., and Rothstein, S. J. (2018). ROS-Induced anthocyanin production provides feedback protection by scavenging ROS and maintaining photosynthetic capacity in Arabidopsis. Plant Signal. Behav. 13:e1451708. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2018.1451708

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, Z. S., Yang, Q. Q., Feng, K., Yu, X., and Xiong, A. S. (2020). DcMYB113, a root-specific R2R3-MYB, conditions anthocyanin biosynthesis and modification in carrot. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 1585–1597. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13325

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yan, H., Pei, X., Zhang, H., Li, X., Zhang, X., Zhao, M., et al. (2021). MYB-Mediated regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22:3103.

Google Scholar

Yan, Q., Wang, Q., Xuzhen, C., Wang, L., Somta, P., Xue, C., et al. (2020). High-quality genome assembly, annotation and evolutionary analysis of the mungbean (Vigna radiata) genome. Authorea. doi: 10.22541/au.160587196.63922177/v1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, X. H., Wang, J. R., Xia, X. Z., Zhang, Z. Q., He, J., Nong, B. X., et al. (2021). OsTTG1, a WD40 repeat gene, regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis in rice. Plant J. 107, 198–214. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15285

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yao, G., Ming, M., Allan, A. C., Gu, C., Li, L., Wu, X., et al. (2017). Map-based cloning of the pear gene MYB114 identifies an interaction with other transcription factors to coordinately regulate fruit anthocyanin biosynthesis. Plant J. 92, 437–451. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13666

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yoo, S. D., Cho, Y. H., and Sheen, J. (2007). Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1565–1572. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.199

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, J., and Dixon, R. A. (2010). The ‘ins’ and ‘outs’ of flavonoid transport. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 72–80.

Google Scholar

Zhao, J., Huhman, D., Shadle, G., He, X. Z., Sumner, L. W., Tang, Y. H., et al. (2011). MATE2 mediates vacuolar sequestration of flavonoid glycosides and glycoside malonates in Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell 23, 1536–1555. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.080804

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhi, J., Liu, X., Li, D., Huang, Y., Yan, S., Cao, B., et al. (2020). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated SlAN2 mutants reveal various regulatory models of anthocyanin biosynthesis in tomato plant. Plant Cell Rep. 39, 799–809. doi: 10.1007/s00299-020-02531-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhong, C., Tang, Y., Pang, B., Li, X., Yang, Y., Deng, J., et al. (2020). The R2R3-MYB transcription factor GhMYB1a regulates flavonol and anthocyanin accumulation in Gerbera hybrida. Hortic. Res. 7:78. doi: 10.1038/s41438-020-0296-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, Z. X., Wang, H. L., Wang, Y. T., Guan, S., Wang, F., Tang, J. Y., et al. (2015). Characterization of the cis elements in the proximal promoter regions of the anthocyanin pathway genes reveals a common regulatory logic that governs pathway regulation. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 3775–3789. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv173

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zimmermann, I. M., Heim, M. A., Weisshaar, B., and Uhrig, J. F. (2004). Comprehensive identification of Arabidopsis thaliana MYB transcription factors interacting with R/B-like BHLH proteins. Plant J. 40, 22–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02183.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: mungbean, Vigna radiata, anthocyanins, MYB90, hypocotyl color

Citation: Lin Y, Laosatit K, Liu J, Chen J, Yuan X, Somta P and Chen X (2022) The mungbean VrP locus encoding MYB90, an R2R3-type MYB protein, regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis. Front. Plant Sci. 13:895634. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.895634

Received: 14 March 2022; Accepted: 27 June 2022;
Published: 22 July 2022.

Edited by:

Byoung-Cheorl Kang, Seoul National University, South Korea

Reviewed by:

Je Min Lee, Kyungpook National University, South Korea
Sung-Chur Sim, Sejong University, South Korea

Copyright © 2022 Lin, Laosatit, Liu, Chen, Yuan, Somta and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Prakit Somta, YWdycGtzQGt1LmFjLnRo; Xin Chen, Y3hAamFhcy5hYy5jbg==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.