Sergio Saia
Jan Jansa- 1Department of Veterinary Science, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- 2Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology, Prague, Czechia
Editorial on the Research Topic
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi: The Bridge Between Plants, Soils, and Humans
It is assumed that arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis is established between the roots/rhizoids of ca 70% of all plant species, including some of the most important crops, and specialized soil fungi (Brundrett and Tedersoo, 2018). The AM fungi provide a direct interconnection between roots and soil as well as between root systems of different plant individuals belonging to the same or different plant species (Walder et al., 2012; Weremijewicz et al., 2016; Rezáčová et al., 2018b). The AM fungi exert several direct (e.g., enhanced nutrient acquisition, pollutant immobilization/detoxification, plant carbon reallocation, induced pathogen tolerance, signal transfer), and indirect (e.g., photosynthesis stimulation, drought tolerance, soil physical, and microbial conditioning) effects on the plants, with possible consequences to yield and agricultural product quality, multitrophic interaction networks, and soil quality (Kaschuk et al., 2009; Johnson, 2010; Smith et al., 2010; Garg and Chandel, 2011; Rezáčová et al., 2018a). Besides having a finely tuned molecular dialogue with their plant hosts, the fungi also interact with soil microbes fulfilling important ecosystem functions, such as organic nutrient mineralization or stabilization of soil organic matter (Verbruggen et al., 2016; Jiang F. et al., 2021; Rozmoš et al., 2021; Sánchez et al., 2021), and these interactions are further modulated by environmental (soil, climatic, ecosystem management) contexts (Frey-Klett et al., 2007; Hoeksema et al., 2010).
The goal of this Research Topic was to provide an illustration of the range of different views on the functioning of AM symbiosis in natural and anthropogenic systems, to promote mechanistic understanding of the formation, extent, and dynamics of the AM fungal hyphal networks and associated microbes in the soil and to add to the mounting knowledge on the feedbacks between human activities and ecosystem functioning, with a particular focus on the role of AM fungal symbiosis across various plant species/genotypes, soil types, and climatic regions.
We received 30 manuscripts dedicated to the various aspects of mycorrhizal symbioses specified above, out of which 11 were eventually accepted for including in this collection. These publications deal with plant-AM fungi interactions (and occasionally also with other mycorrhizal types, Table 1) and their role in satisfying various human needs. They include “review/meta-analyses” (three articles), “genotype, genetic, and omics aspects” (five articles), “abiotic stress and plant nutrition aspects” (nine articles); “monocots” (two articles); “tree species” (three articles); and works performed under “field conditions” (eight articles). Particularly, we are happy to cover the latter aspect quite broadly, of which the studies are usually underrepresented in the literature compared to the research carried out under controlled conditions (Lekberg and Koide, 2005; Kaschuk et al., 2010; Pellegrino et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2019; Jiang S. et al., 2021; Qiu et al., 2022; Salomon et al., 2022). The results of the currently presented research thus contribute in a relevant way to the long ongoing debate on the use and usefulness of the mycorrhizal technology in agriculture and its prospective as an agronomic strategy for the future (Frossard et al., 2009; Gianinazzi et al., 2010; Ryan and Graham, 2018; Rillig et al., 2019; Ryan et al., 2019; Benami et al., 2020; Brito et al., 2021). We believe that such a multifaceted debate, also happening in other aspects of the crops and/or environmental management (Sadras et al., 2020), is much needed and to a large extent still not reaching a broad consensus, mainly due to the lack of sufficient data and generally valid concepts. Indeed, more detailed information seems to be needed on how different agronomic practices affect indigenous AM fungi in the different soils, how this links to human needs, and how this all is affected by changing environmental context. Besides, novel concepts and demonstrations of their validity are needed in terms of potential manipulation of the systems for the good of the humans and the ecosystems. This collection contributes to reducing such knowledge gaps.
Table 1. Synopsis of the articles published in the collections and number of topics covered.
In particular, two excellent perspectives cover the establishment and functions of the AMF symbiosis in sustainable agroecosystems: Johnson and Gibson pointed out that the mycorrhizal role and benefit should be studied and understood while considering a multilevel selection resulting in a local adaption. Along similar lines, Bicharanloo et al. clarified, through a meta-analytical approach, that specific root respiration (SRR), which could be regarded as a proxy for mycorrhizal costs, did not vary among the AM and non-mycorrhizal (NM) plants subjected to different N fertilization levels, in contrast to ectomycorrhizal (ECM) plants. These results are complementary to insightful comparisons between the two different types of mycorrhizal symbiosis across gradients of environmental stoichiometry provided by Yang et al., who found a higher nitrogen concentration in AM-associated compared to the ECM fungi-associated shrub plants, and who also observed opposite trends for phosphorus concentrations, thus suggesting that under C non-limited conditions, such as in the shrub plants, the N demand by AM fungi can stimulate plant growth benefits particularly under higher N availability. Results by Bicharanloo et al. may have thus depended the variability in the C-sink limitations among the plant species included (Gamper et al., 2004). Nonetheless, the results also provide indirect evidence that management of AM fungal activity (either through inoculation or conservation of the indigenous AM fungi) should not be ignored even under intensively fertilized systems, particularly if underrepresented plant/crop species are considered.
Leifheit et al. tackled the possible implication for the AM fungi of one of the understudied factor of global change, namely the soil pollution with microplastics. After reviewing the current knowledge, they elaborate on the priorities for future experimental work focused on understanding the importance of such emerging thread as the microplastics for ecosystem functioning in general and the AM symbiosis in particular.
Other articles included in this collection cover a wealth of aspects relevant to mycorrhizal functioning under various agroecosystems and environmental settings. Stefani et al. studied the recruitment of the native AM fungal communities in contrasting genotypes of durum wheat in Canada, showing that the main environmental filter was actually the plant genotype identity and the traits independent of the root colonization rate. These results are not only demonstrating that different genotypes recruit quite different AM fungi from the same soil pool. Together with previous research (e.g., Jansa et al., 2008; Lendenmann et al., 2011; Veiga et al., 2011; Thonar et al., 2013; Knegt et al., 2016), these results allow speculations about consequences of changing crop genotype (or crop mixture composition) to derive different mycorrhizal benefits in terms of plant nutrition and/or growth, as well as co-existence of the crops with weeds.
Peña Venegas et al. showed that cassava farming in equatorial Africa could benefit from the inoculation with specific genotypes of AM fungi even under high P supply, which has previously been considered detrimental for the development and/or functioning of the AM fungi. These results align nicely with the elegant experiment of Andrino et al., who showed that in tomato, the AM fungi could release low-molecular-weight organic acids that facilitate P uptake from highly P-fixing soil along with other elements, such as Fe. Andrino et al. also pointed that membrane fluidity could vary in the AM fungi supplied with various P sources and this can further affect their P uptake from the soil and delivery to their host plants.
Alexandre et al. worked on teak (Tectona grandis L.f.), an important timber species in Brazil, and confirmed that the amendment of clonally propagated plantlets with AM fungi and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria could significantly improve plant growth and nutrition, thus fostering their field growth between 4.75 and 11.04%. Similarly, Rashad et al. demonstrated mycorrhizal benefits and underlying metabolic pathways in banana plantlets subjected to different abiotic (salinity) and biotic (pathogen) stresses. Along similar lines, mycorrhizal benefits were also elaborated on the medicinal plant Eclipta prostrata (Duc et al.) subjected to salinity stress, which seem to have been coupled with modulation of the polyphenol production. Thus, the present results generally confirm previous findings on the ability of the AM fungi to modulate secondary metabolism (Zeng et al., 2013; Lazzara et al., 2017; Saia et al., 2019) of a range of medicinal and other plants, despite the remaining uncertainty in the mycorrhizal effects on the volatile compounds composition (Saia et al., 2021).
Somewhat contrasting with the previous research, Torres et al. found that in grapevines, the AM fungi affected more the secondary compound production under contrasting water availability regimes than the leaf mineral content (indicative of direct nutritional effects). These differences between the results of Torres et al. and the previously cited works could possibly be explained by differential nutrient reserves accumulated in the plants before onset of the stresses, which could potentially buffer the stress impact on plants and promote apparition of other than nutritional mycorrhizal benefit.
The majority of the studies thus aimed at elucidating physiological mechanism of the abiotic stress responses in AM plants. All the studies contributed to the debate on greater utilization of mycorrhizal symbiosis in agronomy and forestry practices, either as planned interventions or as a collateral effect. Importantly, 8 out of the 11 studies has been conducted, or dealing with, field conditions. We believe the integration of these results contributed to create useful resource for our peers and students. We would like to thank all contributors for their work and patience in these uneasy COVID times and to the Frontiers staff for their relentless support and assistance for making this to happen.
Author Contributions
Both authors equally contributed to this editorial and the special issue management. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
The guest editors are heartfully thanks the reviewers in their aid helping this special issue.
References
Benami, M., Isack, Y., Grotsky, D., Levy, D., and Kofman, Y. (2020). “The economic potential of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in agriculture,” in Grand Challenges in Fungal Biotechnology: Grand Challenges in Biology and Biotechnology, ed H. Nevalainen (Cham: Springer), 239–279. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-29541-7_9
Brito, I., Carvalho, M., and Goss, M. J. (2021). Managing the functional diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for the sustainable intensification of crop production. Plants People Planet 3, 491–505. doi: 10.1002/ppp3.10212
Brundrett, M. C., and Tedersoo, L. (2018). Evolutionary history of mycorrhizal symbioses and global host plant diversity. New Phytol. 220, 1108–1115. doi: 10.1111/nph.14976
Frey-Klett, P., Garbaye, J., and Tarkka, M. (2007). The mycorrhiza helper bacteria revisited. New Phytol. 176, 22–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02191.x
Frossard, E., Bünemann, E., Jansa, J., Oberson, A., and Feller, C. (2009). Concepts and practices of nutrient management in agro-ecosystems: can we draw lessons from history to design future sustainable agricultural production systems? Bodenkultur 60, 43–60. Available online at: https://diebodenkultur.boku.ac.at/volltexte/band-60/heft-1/frossard.pdf
Gamper, H., Peter, M., Jansa, J., Luscher, A., Hartwig, U. a., et al. (2004). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi benefit from 7 years of free air CO2 enrichment in well-fertilized grass and legume monocultures. Glob. Chang. Biol. 10, 189–199. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00734.x
Garg, N., and Chandel, S. (2011). “Arbuscular mycorrhizal networks: process and functions,” in Sustainable Agriculture, Vol. 2, eds E. Lichtfouse, M. Hamelin, M. Navarrete, and P. Debaeke (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands), 907–930. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-0394-0_40
Gianinazzi, S., Gollotte, A., Binet, M.-N. N., van Tuinen, D., Redecker, D., and Wipf, D. (2010). Agroecology: the key role of arbuscular mycorrhizas in ecosystem services. Mycorrhiza 20, 519–530. doi: 10.1007/s00572-010-0333-3
Hoeksema, J. D., Chaudhary, V. B., Gehring, C. A., Johnson, N. C., Karst, J., Koide, R. T., et al. (2010). A meta-analysis of context-dependency in plant response to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi. Ecol. Lett. 13, 394–407. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01430.x
Jansa, J., Smith, F., and Smith, S. E. (2008). Are there benefits of simultaneous root colonization by diferent arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi? New Phytol. 177, 779–789. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02294.x
Jiang, F., Zhang, L., Zhou, J., George, T. S., and Feng, G. (2021). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance mineralisation of organic phosphorus by carrying bacteria along their extraradical hyphae. New Phytol. 230, 304–315. doi: 10.1111/nph.17081
Jiang, S., An, X., Shao, Y., Kang, Y., Chen, T., Mei, X., et al. (2021). Responses of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi occurrence to organic fertilizer: a meta-analysis of field studies. Plant Soil 469, 89–105. doi: 10.1007/s11104-021-05153-y
Johnson, N. C. (2010). Resource stoichiometry elucidates the structure and function of arbuscular mycorrhizas across scales. New Phytol. 185, 631–647. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03110.x
Kaschuk, G., Kuyper, T. W., Leffelaar, P. A., Hungria, M., and Giller, K. E. (2009). Are the rates of photosynthesis stimulated by the carbon sink strength of rhizobial and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses? Soil Biol. Biochem. 41, 1233–1244. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.03.005
Kaschuk, G., Leffelaar, P., Giller, K. E., Alberton, O., Hungria, M., and Kuyper, T. W. (2010). Responses of legumes to rhizobia and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: a meta-analysis of potential photosynthate limitation of symbioses. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42, 125–127. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.10.017
Knegt, B., Jansa, J., Franken, O., Engelmoer, D. J. P., Werner, G. D. A., Bücking, H., et al. (2016). Host plant quality mediates competition between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Fungal Ecol. 20, 233–240. doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2014.09.011
Lazzara, S., Militello, M., Carrubba, A., Napoli, E., and Saia, S. (2017). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi altered the hypericin, pseudohypericin, and hyperforin content in flowers of Hypericum perforatum grown under contrasting P availability in a highly organic substrate. Mycorrhiza 27, 345–354. doi: 10.1007/s00572-016-0756-6
Lekberg, Y., and Koide, R. T. (2005). Is plant performance limited by abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi? A meta-analysis of studies published between 1988 and 2003. New Phytol. 168, 189–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01490.x
Lendenmann, M., Thonar, C., Barnard, R. L., Salmon, Y., Werner, R. A., Frossard, E., et al. (2011). Symbiont identity matters: carbon and phosphorus fluxes between Medicago truncatula and different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza 21, 689–702. doi: 10.1007/s00572-011-0371-5
Pellegrino, E., Öpik, M., Bonari, E., and Ercoli, L. (2015). Responses of wheat to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: a meta-analysis of field studies from 1975 to 2013. Soil Biol. Biochem. 84, 210–217. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.02.020
Qiu, Q., Bender, S. F., Mgelwa, A. S., and Hu, Y. (2022). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi mitigate soil nitrogen and phosphorus losses: a meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 807:150857. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150857
Rezáčová, V., Slavíková, R., Zemková, L., Konvalinková, T., Procházková, V., Štovíček, V., et al. (2018a). Mycorrhizal symbiosis induces plant carbon reallocation differently in C3 and C4 Panicum grasses. Plant Soil 425, 441–456. doi: 10.1007/s11104-018-3606-9
Rezáčová, V., Zemková, L., Beskid, O., Püschel, D., Konvalinkov,á, T., Hujslová, M., et al. (2018b). Little cross-feeding of the mycorrhizal networks shared between C3-panicum bisulcatum and C4-panicum maximum under different temperature regimes. Front. Plant Sci. 9:449. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00449
Rillig, M. C., Aguilar-Trigueros, C. A., Camenzind, T., Cavagnaro, T. R., Degrune, F., Hohmann, P., et al. (2019). Why farmers should manage the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytol. 222, 1171–1175. doi: 10.1111/nph.15602
Rozmoš, M., Bukovská, P., Hršelová, H., Kotianová, M., Dudáš, M., Gančarčíková, K., et al. (2021). Organic nitrogen utilisation by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus is mediated by specific soil bacteria and a protist. ISME J. 16, 676–685. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01112-8
Ryan, M. H., and Graham, J. H. (2018). Little evidence that farmers should consider abundance or diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi when managing crops. New Phytol. 220, 1092–1107. doi: 10.1111/nph.15308
Ryan, M. H., Graham, J. H., Morton, J. B., and Kirkegaard, J. A. (2019). Research must use a systems agronomy approach if management of the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis is to contribute to sustainable intensification. New Phytol. 222, 1176–1178. doi: 10.1111/nph.15600
Sadras, V., Alston, J., Aphalo, P., Connor, D., Denison, R. F., Fischer, T., et al. (2020). “Making science more effective for agriculture,” in Advances in Agronomy, ed D. L. Sparks (Academic Press), 153–177. doi: 10.1016/bs.agron.2020.05.003
Saia, S., Corrado, G., Vitaglione, P., Colla, G., Bonini, P., Giordano, M., et al. (2021). An endophytic fungi-based biostimulant modulates volatile and non-volatile secondary metabolites and yield of greenhouse basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) through variable mechanisms dependent on salinity stress level. Pathogens 10:797. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10070797
Saia, S., Fragasso, M., De Vita, P., and Beleggia, R. (2019). Metabolomics provides valuable insight for the study of durum wheat: a review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 67, 3069–3085. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b07097
Salomon, M. J., Demarmels, R., Watts-Williams, S. J., McLaughlin, M. J., Kafle, A., Ketelsen, C., et al. (2022). Global evaluation of commercial arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculants under greenhouse and field conditions. Appl. Soil Ecol. 169:104225. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104225
Sánchez, M. G., Saia, S., and Aranda, E. (2021). “The contribution of fungi and their lifestyle in the nitrogen cycle,” in Nitrogen Cycle 1st Edn, eds J. Gonzalez-Lopez and A. Gonzalez-Martinez (Boca Raton, FL : CRC PRESS), 82–101. doi: 10.1201/9780429291180-5
Smith, S. E., Facelli, E., Pope, S., and Andrew Smith, F. (2010). Plant performance in stressful environments: interpreting new and established knowledge of the roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas. Plant Soil 326, 3–20. doi: 10.1007/s11104-009-9981-5
Thonar, C., Frossard, E., Šmilauer, P., and Jansa, J. (2013). Competition and facilitation in synthetic communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Mol. Ecol. 23, 733–746. doi: 10.1111/mec.12625
Veiga, R. S. L., Jansa, J., Frossard, E., and Van Der Heijden, M. G. A. (2011). Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduce the growth of agricultural weeds? PLoS ONE 6:e27825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027825
Verbruggen, E., Jansa, J., Hammer, E. C., and Rillig, M. C. (2016). Do arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi stabilize litter-derived carbon in soil? J. Ecol. 104, 261–269. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12496
Walder, F., Niemann, H., Natarajan, M., Lehmann, M. F., Boller, T., and Wiemken, A. (2012). Mycorrhizal networks: common goods of plants shared under unequal terms of trade. Plant Physiol. 159, 789–797. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.195727
Weremijewicz, J., Sternberg, L., da, S. L. O., and Janos, D. P. (2016). Common mycorrhizal networks amplify competition by preferential mineral nutrient allocation to large host plants. New Phytol. 212, 461–471. doi: 10.1111/nph.14041
Zeng, Y., Guo, L.-P., Chen, B.-D., Hao, Z.-P., Wang, J.-Y., Huang, L.-Q., et al. (2013). Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and active ingredients of medicinal plants: current research status and prospectives. Mycorrhiza 23, 253–265. doi: 10.1007/s00572-013-0484-0
Keywords: beneficial microbes, nutrient limitation, human needs, soil health, plant stress, pathogens, sustainable agro-ecosystem, sustainability
Citation: Saia S and Jansa J (2022) Editorial: Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi: The Bridge Between Plants, Soils, and Humans. Front. Plant Sci. 13:875958. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.875958
Received: 14 February 2022; Accepted: 14 March 2022;
Published: 04 April 2022.
Edited and reviewed by:
Raffaella Balestrini, Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection (CNR), ItalyCopyright © 2022 Saia and Jansa. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sergio Saia, c2VyZ2lvLnNhaWEmI3gwMDA0MDt1bmlwaS5pdA==