Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 15 March 2022
Sec. Plant Physiology

Impact of Porphyrin Binding to GENOMES UNCOUPLED 4 on Tetrapyrrole Biosynthesis in planta

  • 1Physiology of Plant Cell Organelles, Humboldt-Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • 2Department of Plant Physiology, Humboldt-Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • 3Physiology of Plant Metabolism, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany

Plant tetrapyrrole biosynthesis (TPS) provides the indispensable chlorophyll (Chl) and heme molecules in photosynthetic organisms. Post-translational mechanisms control the enzymes to ensure a balanced flow of intermediates in the pathway and synthesis of appropriate amounts of both endproducts. One of the critical regulators of TPS is GENOMES UNCOUPLED 4 (GUN4). GUN4 interacts with magnesium chelatase (MgCh), and its binding of the catalytic substrate and product of the MgCh reaction stimulates the insertion of Mg2+ into protoporphyrin IX. Despite numerous in vitro studies, knowledge about the in vivo function of the GUN4:porphyrin interaction for the whole TPS pathway, particularly in plants, is still limited. To address this, we focused on two highly conserved amino acids crucial for porphyrin-binding to GUN4 and analyzed GUN4-F191A, R211A, and R211E substitution mutants in vitro and in vivo. Our analysis confirmed the importance of these amino acids for porphyrin-binding and the stimulation of plant MgCh by GUN4 in vitro. Expression of porphyrin-binding deficient F191A, R211A, and R211E in the Arabidopsis gun4-2 knockout mutant background revealed that, unlike in cyanobacteria and green algae, GUN4:porphyrin interactions did not affect the stability of GUN4 or other Arabidopsis TPS pathway enzymes in vivo. In addition, although they shared diminished porphyrin-binding and MgCh activation in vitro, expression of the different GUN4 mutants in gun4-2 had divergent effects on the TPS and the accumulation of Chl and Chl-binding proteins. For instance, expression of R211E, but not R211A, induced a substantial decrease of ALA synthesis rate, lower TPS intermediate and Chl level, and strongly impaired accumulation of photosynthetic complexes compared to wild-type plants. Furthermore, the presence of R211E led to significant growth retardation and paler leaves compared to GUN4 knockdown mutants, indicating that the exchange of R211 to glutamate compromised TPS and Chl accumulation more substantially than the almost complete lack of GUN4. Extensive in vivo analysis of GUN4 point mutants suggested that F191 and R211 might also play a role beyond porphyrin-binding.

Introduction

In photosynthetic organisms, tetrapyrrole biosynthesis (TPS) provides the essential molecules chlorophyll (Chl), heme, siroheme, and phytochromobilin. Chl serves in photosynthesis, heme in electron transfer reactions, siroheme in nitrogen and sulfur assimilation and phytochromobilin in light-regulated gene expression (Tanaka and Tanaka, 2007; Tanaka et al., 2011; Brzezowski et al., 2015). TPS is located in plastids and initiated with the synthesis of 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA), the common precursor for all tetrapyrroles. In higher plants, algae, and most bacteria, ALA is synthesized from glutamate ligated to tRNA (Glu), which is converted to glutamate 1-semialdehyde (GSA) by GLUTAMYL-tRNA REDUCTASES 1 and 2 (GluTR is encoded by HEMA1 and 2). Subsequently, GLUTAMATE 1-SEMIALDEHYDE AMINOTRANSFERASE (GSAAT) catalyzes the formation of ALA. Eight ALA molecules are converted to protoporphyrin IX (PIX), the last common macrocyclic precursor for heme and chlorophyll biosynthesis (Tanaka and Tanaka, 2007; Tanaka et al., 2011; Brzezowski et al., 2015). Within the heme branch of TPS, FERROCHELATASE (FC) inserts Fe2+ into PIX, yielding protoheme. Within the Chl branch, ATP-dependent insertion of Mg2+ into PIX is catalyzed by MAGNESIUM CHELATASE (MgCh). The MgCh is a multi-enzyme complex composed of the catalytic H subunit (CHLH) and two rings of hexameric D and I subunits, respectively (encoded by CHLI and CHLD) (Lundqvist et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2015a; Adams et al., 2020; Gao et al., 2020). In the two subsequent reactions, Mg protoporphyrin IX (MgP), the product of the MgCh reaction, is converted to protochlorophyllide (Pchlide) by MgP methyltransferase (MgPMT/CHLM) and aerobic cyclase (Tanaka and Tanaka, 2007; Tanaka et al., 2011; Brzezowski et al., 2015). In angiosperms, the conversion of Pchlide to chlorophyllide (Chlide) is catalyzed by the strictly light-dependent PROTOCHLOROPHYLLIDE OXIDOREDUCTASE (POR). Subsequently, Chl synthase esterifies Chlide and phytyl-pyrophosphate, and CHLOROPHYLL A OXYGENASE (CAO) catalyzes Chl b formation from Chlide a or Chl a. Chl a and Chl b are then integrated into Chl-binding proteins of the core complexes of photosystem I and II and their outer antenna complexes consisting of light-harvesting chlorophyll-binding proteins (LH) (Mochizuki et al., 2010; Wang and Grimm, 2021).

When unbound Chl and Chl precursors of the TPS pathway absorb light, they can transfer the excitation energy to molecular oxygen and generate highly reactive singlet oxygen (1O2). Control of the balanced flow of intermediates toward the TPS end-products prevents photooxidative stress by post-translational mechanisms regulating stability and activity of the TPS enzymes and their protein-protein interactions (Moulin and Smith, 2005; Richter and Grimm, 2013, 2019; Brzezowski et al., 2015; Wittmann et al., 2021). The GENOMES UNCOUPLED 4 (GUN4) protein, identified in a screen for retrograde signaling mutants (Susek et al., 1993; Larkin et al., 2003), is a post-translational regulator of Chl biosynthesis in cyanobacteria, green algae and plants (Larkin et al., 2003; Wilde et al., 2004; Sobotka et al., 2008; Peter and Grimm, 2009; Formighieri et al., 2012; Brzezowski et al., 2014). In Arabidopsis GUN4 is not essential for basal MgCh activity and Chl formation in continuous low light (Larkin et al., 2003; Peter and Grimm, 2009). However, although details on the molecular mechanism are still missing, GUN4 interaction with the H subunit of MgCh stimulated the chelation of PIX to MgP (Larkin et al., 2003; Davison et al., 2005; Verdecia et al., 2005). In angiosperms, the C-terminus of GUN4 (Zhou et al., 2012; Richter et al., 2016) is crucial, as phosphorylation of the penultimate amino acid controls the stimulation of Mg chelation in vivo and in vitro (Richter et al., 2016). Also, physical interaction with BALANCE of CHLOROPHYLL METABOLISM1 (BCM1), a thylakoid bound scaffold protein, is essential for the maximum stimulation of MgCh by GUN4 (Wang et al., 2020). Recently it has also been shown that GUN4 is stabilized and prevented from aggregation through the interaction with the chloroplast SIGNAL-RECOGNITION PARTICLE COMPONENT 43 (cpSRP43), thereby promoting high MgCh activity even during heat stress (Ji et al., 2021). In addition to MgCh stimulation, GUN4 was also proposed to regulate ALA synthesis by a yet unknown mechanism (Peter and Grimm, 2009). While overexpression of GUN4 led to increased ALA synthesis capacity in tobacco, gun4-3 knockdown mutants showed reduced ALA synthesis. Furthermore, Chl deficiency in response to GUN4-knockout can be partially complemented by exogenous ALA, indicating that diminished ALA synthesis contributes to the Chl deficiency in gun4-2 (Peter and Grimm, 2009).

Biochemical and structural analysis revealed that GUN4 from cyanobacteria, green algae and plants binds the substrate and product of the MgCh reaction but also other TPS intermediates (Davison et al., 2005; Verdecia et al., 2005; Adhikari et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2015b; Tarahi Tabrizi et al., 2015; Hu et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021). Tetrapyrrole binding is stabilized by hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions between the substrate(s) and conserved amino acids in helix α2 and a flexible loop between helices α6 and α7 of GUN4 (see also Figure 1). Both structural elements are part of the GUN4 porphyrin binding pocket (Davison et al., 2005; Verdecia et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2015b). MgP binding to Synechocystis (Syn) GUN4 was shown to be crucial for the stimulatory effect on the MgCh reaction (Verdecia et al., 2005). Based on the approximately 10-fold higher affinity toward MgP than PIX, a function of GUN4 for product release from the MgCh and channeling to the subsequent enzyme MgPMT was proposed. However, altered porphyrin binding to Thermosynechococcus elongatus (Te) GUN4 did not abrogate MgCh stimulation. Also, TeGUN4 increased the sensitivity of MgCh for Mg2+ (Davison et al., 2005). Porphyrin-dependent association of pea and Arabidopsis GUN4 to thylakoid membranes and the MgCh H subunit was shown (Adhikari et al., 2009, 2011), but this seems to be not the case for Synechocystis GUN4 (Kopecna et al., 2015). Despite its impact on MgCh, the binding of porphyrins to GUN4 influences the abundance of GUN4 in high light-treated Arabidopsis plants (Adhikari et al., 2011), the stability of MgCH H1 subunit (Zhang et al., 2021) and 1O2 formation and retrograde signaling in Chlamydomonas (Brzezowski et al., 2014; Tarahi Tabrizi et al., 2016).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. In vivo analysis of porphyrin binding and Mg-chelatase (MgCh) activity in the presence of WT and mutant GENOMES UNCOUPLED 4 (GUN4). (A) Overlay of the three-dimensional structure of Synechocystis (Syn) GUN4 (green) and a predicted structure (PHYRE2, Kelley et al., 2015) of Arabidopsis thaliana (At) GUN4 (beige). The crystal of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 GUN4 (1Y6I) contained the porphyrin derivate - magnesium deuteroporphyrin IX (MgDIX) - which resembles the native product of the MgCh reaction (MgP). Amino acids analyzed in this study are highlighted (pink). (B,C) Analysis of PIX (B) and MgP (C) binding to GUN4(WT) and substitution mutants of GUN4 using Trp-fluorescence quenching analysis. Data points for the relative fluorescence quenching (αF) reflect the mean of a total of five titration curves from two independent protein purifications. The maximum fluorescence quenching efficiency of the highest porphyrin concentration was set to 1. (D) Apparent dissociation constants (Kd) for PIX and MgP binding to GUN4, calculated from the binding curves shown in panels (B,C) (mean ± S.E.) for n = 4 binding curves analyzed with independent protein preparations). Values inside the bars indicate the fold change of the Kd relative to the WT protein. (E) In vitro MgCh assay using recombinant rice (Oryza sativa) MgCh subunits in the absence (gray) or presence of GUN4 (WT) (blue), GUN4(F191A) (red), GUN4(R211A) (green) and GUN4 (R211E) (purple), respectively. The formation of the MgCh reaction (PIX) product was monitored as an increase in fluorescence emission at 595 nm. MgCh assays were repeated three times with proteins from independent purifications, and one representative result is shown.

Although the intensive research on GUN4 provided valuable insights on its function for MgCh and intracellular communication, a comprehensive study on the impact of GUN4:porphyrin complexes on the whole TPS in plants is still missing. Therefore, we complemented the Arabidopsis gun4-2 knockout mutant with genomic constructs encoding for GUN4 variants with altered porphyrin-binding affinity and analyzed ALA synthesis, steady-state levels of TPS intermediates and end products, the gene expression and the content of proteins in TPS and photosynthetic complexes.

Materials and Methods

Plant Material, Growth Conditions, and 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Feeding

If not otherwise stated Arabidopsis thaliana wild-type and mutant plants were grown on soil for 14–21 days at 100 μmol photons m–2 s–1 in short-day (SD) conditions (10 h light). The following genotypes were used in this study: gun4-1 (EMS mutant, Larkin et al., 2003), gun4-2 (SALK_0264911, Larkin et al., 2003, maintained in the heterozygous state), gun4-3 (SALK_011461,Peter and Grimm, 2009), cao (SAIL_1238_D01), knockout mutant for cpSRP43 (chaos in Landsberg-0 ecotype), for cpSRP54 (ffc, WiscDsLox289_292B14) and the chaos/ffc double mutant (Wang et al., 2018). For long-term ALA feeding, seeds were surface sterilized using ethanol and plated on 0.5 × MS plates (4.4 g/l MS, 0.5 g/l MES, 0.8% Agar, pH 5.7) without or supplemented with 100 or 250 μM ALA, respectively. For ALA feeding in the presence of an exogenous carbon source, 1% sucrose was added to the medium. Plates were kept at 60 μmol photons m–2 s–1 (continuous light). For short-term ALA feeding, plants were incubated in buffer (20 mM TRIS, pH 7.5) without or supplemented with 1 mM ALA for 20 h in darkness. After incubation, leaves were dried on a tissue and frozen in liquid nitrogen.

Cloning, Complementation, and Recombinant Protein Expression

Cloning of the complementation constructs encoding GUN4-F191A, -R211A, and -R211E was essentially performed as previously reported (Richter et al., 2016). Genomic DNA fragments were amplified from Col-0 genomic DNA (gDNA) with 800 bp upstream (5′, including the promoter) and 600 bp downstream (3′) of the GUN4 exon (AT3G59400). The following primer were used: CCCGGGCGAAGAATCACCACAATCTAC (fwd, SmaI) and CACGTGCCTGTGACGGTTCACACCA (rev, PmlI). The GUN4(WT) fragment was cloned into pCambia3301 using SmaI and PmlI restriction sites. Base exchanges were introduced via a site-directed mutagenesis PCR (Laible and Boonrod, 2009) using the following primers: AtGUN4_F191A_fwd (TTTCCTGACGAAGCCAAGTGGGAGCTT), AtGUN4_F191 A_rev (AAGCTCCCACTTGGCTTCGTCAGGAAA), AtGU N4_R211A_fwd (ACAAACGCCTTGGCAGGAACGCAGCTT), AtGUN4_R211A_rev (AAGCTGCGTTCCTGCCAAGGCGTTT GT), AtGUN4_R211E_fwd (ACAAACGCCTTGGAAGGAACG CAGCTT), AtGUN4_R211E_rev (AAGCTGCGT TCCTTCCAAGGCGTTTGT). The pCambia_GUN4(WT) (Richter et al., 2016) vector was used as template, and base exchange was verified by sequencing. Constructs for recombinant expression of 6xHIS-tagged protein were constructed using the SDM method and primer listed above and the previously published pQE80_AtGUN4(WT) vector as template. Proteins were expressed and purified as described before (Richter et al., 2016). Complementation of the heterozygous gun4-2 mutant, selection and genotyping of homozygous transformants was performed as previously reported (Richter et al., 2016).

Porphyrin, Pigment, and Heme Analysis

Chlorophyll, TPS intermediates and heme were extracted from 50 to 100 mg of ground and lyophilized plant material using 1 mL acetone:0.2 M NH4OH (9:1, v/v) at −20°C for at least 30 min. Samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 4°C (14,000 g), supernatants were transferred to new reaction tubes and centrifuged again for 30 min at 4°C (14,000 g). The remaining pellets of Chl extraction were used to extract non-covalently bound heme with 200 μL acetone:HCl:DMSO; 10:0.5:2 (v/v/v) for 20 min at RT. Following centrifugation (30 min, 14,000 g, RT) supernatants were subjected to HPLC analysis. HPLC analysis for pigments, heme and intermediates was performed on Agilent HPLC systems, essentially as described previously (Schlicke et al., 2014; Scharfenberg et al., 2015).

RNA, cDNA, and qPCR

RNA was extracted from frozen leaf tissue following the protocol published by Oñate-Sánchez and Vicente-Carbajosa (2008). 1–2 μg DNase treated RNA (ThermoFisher Scientific, MA, United States), were transcribed to cDNA using the Revert Aid RT (ThermoFisher Scientific, MA, United States) and oligo dT(18) primer following the manufacturer protocol. qPCR analysis was carried out using a Bio-Rad CFX Connect Real-Time PCR Detection System and SYBR green qPCR master mix (ChamQ Universal SYBR® qPCR Master Mix, Absource, ger). Primer for gene expression analysis were published before (Richter et al., 2013, 2016), and expression was normalized to SAND (AT2G28390) and calculated relative to the WT samples using the 2–ΔΔC(t) method.

Protein Extraction and Western-Blot Analysis

Frozen plant material was homogenized and proteins were extracted with protein extraction buffer [PEB; 2% (w/v) SDS, 56 mM Na2CO3, 12% (w/v) sucrose, 56 mM DTT, and 2 mM EDTA, pH 8.0] using a fixed ratio of 10 μl PEB per mg of fresh weight. After homogenization, samples were incubated for 20 min at 70°C and subsequently centrifuged for 10 min at 14,000 g at RT. The protein extracts were stored at −20°C until further use. Proteins were separated using SDS-polyacrylamide gels (SDS-PAGE) and blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes (Amersham Protran, GE Healthcare, United Kingdom) via semidry electroblotting. Membranes were probed with specific antibodies.

Determination of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Synthesis Capacity

To determine the ALA-synthesis capacity, leaves were harvested and incubated in buffer supplemented with levulinic acid (20 mM Tris, 40 mM levulinic acid, pH 7.2). After 4–5 h, the plant material was harvested and frozen in liquid nitrogen. The homogenized leaf material was resuspended in 1 mL 20 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.8). After centrifugation (10 min, 14,000 g, 4°C), supernatants (400 μl) were mixed with 100 μL EAA (ethyl acetoacetate) and boiled for 10 min at 95°C. Then, 500 μL of modified Ehrlich’s reagent [373 ml of acetic acid, 90 ml of 70% (v/v) perchloric acid, 1.55 g of HgCl2, 9.10 g of 4-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde, water up to 500 ml] was added to each sample and centrifuged for 5 min (14,000 g at 4°C). The absorption of the ALA pyrrole was measured at 526 nm, 553, and 720 nm using a spectrophotometer. ALA content was calculated based on a standard curve prepared with ALA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States).

Magnesium Chelatase Assay and Binding Affinities

The binding affinities of AtGUN4 variants for porphyrins were determined by tryptophane quenching analysis following previously published protocols (Larkin et al., 2003; Richter et al., 2016). AtGUN4 variants (0.5 μM) were incubated in quenching buffer (50 mM Tricine, 300 mM glycerol, 1 mM DTT, pH 7.9) with increasing amounts of porphyrins (10 mM PIX and MgP stocks in DMSO). Tryptophan fluorescence was measured with excitation and emission wavelengths set to 280 and 340 nm, respectively. The apparent dissociation constants (Kd) were calculated using a one site-specific binding modell (GraphPad Prism). In vitro MgCh assays were performed following previously published protocols using a fluorescence photometer equipped with a 96-well plate reader (Ex 416 nm/Em595 nm for PIX) and a substrate concentration of 6 μM PIX (Zhou et al., 2012; Richter et al., 2016).

Thylakoid Extraction and Blue-Native Polyacrylamide Gels

For thylakoid extraction, the leaves of 6–7-week-old plants were harvested and homogenized using a motor and pestle on ice in 14 mL thylakoid extraction buffer (450 mM sorbitol, 20 mM tricine-KOH [pH 8.4], 10 mM EDTA, 0.1% BSA). The extract was filtered through one layer of Miracloth, and the filtrate was centrifuged for 4 min at 4°C and 4,000 rpm. The pellet was resuspended in 14 mL BN shock buffer (50 mM HEPES-KOH [pH 7.5], 5 mM sorbitol, 5 mM MgCl2) and centrifuged at 4,000 rpm, 4°C for 4 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the thylakoid pellet was resuspended in 400–600 μL 25BTH20G buffer (25 mM BisTris [pH 7.0], 20% glycerol) and frozen at −80°C. Chlorophyll concentration was determined using the absorption of pigment extracts (see above) at 646 and 663 nm. The concentration of chlorophyll a and b was calculated using the formula Chl a + b (μg/μL) = (17.76 × A646 nm × Dilution factor) + (7.34 × A663 nm × Dilution factor). Thylakoid proteins were solubilized from an aliquot corresponding to 32 μg Chl using 1% ß-dodecyl maltoside. BN-PAGE was performed according to Peng et al. (2008) on 4–12.5% BN gels (10 μg Chl per sample).

Chlorophyll Fluorescence Analysis

To determine the maximum Chl fluorescence in the dark-adapted state a saturating light pulse was applied after 20 min dark incubation using a PAM-Imager (MAXI version, WALZ, Germany).

Results

Porphyrin Binding and Magnesium Chelatase Activity

Previous analysis of Synechocystis (Syn) GUN4 and Arabidopsis (At) GUN4 revealed that the conserved AtPhe-191 (corresponds to SynPhe-196) and AtArg-211 (SynArg-214) (Figure 1A) contribute to the binding of porphyrins to GUN4 (Verdecia et al., 2005; Adhikari et al., 2009, 2011). To analyse the impact of these amino acids on Arabidopsis GUN4 function, 6xHIS-tagged WT and point mutants of Arabidopsis GUN4 with amino acid substitutions for phenylalanine 191 (F191A) or arginine 211 (R211A and R211E) were heterologously expressed and purified from E. coli lysates. The latter two substitutions replace arginine with the small and hydrophobic alanine or negatively charged glutamate (Figure 1A). For the analysis of porphyrin-binding affinity, proteins were subjected to tryptophan fluorescence quenching analysis in the presence of an increasing amount of PIX or MgP, respectively (Figures 1B–E). As calculated from the fluorescence quenching curves (Figures 1B,C), all three point mutations compromised the affinity of the mutated GUN4 relative to the WT protein. The WT protein showed apparent dissociation constants (Kd) of 1.05 ± 0.12 and 0.30 ± 0.03 μM for PIX or MgP, respectively (Figure 1D). Relative to GUN4(WT), the F191A mutation led to a 2-fold decrease in the affinity for PIX (Kd = 2.1 ± 0.28 μM) and a 2.5-fold decreased affinity for MgP (Kd = 0.77 ± 0.02 μM; Figure 1D). Compared to F191A, mutation of R211 had a much stronger effect on the porphyrin binding, particularly for MgP. On the one hand, R211A and R211E showed a 3 and 5-fold, respectively, increase in the Kd for PIX, indicating lower affinity compared to the GUN4(WT). On the other hand, the affinity for MgP decreased by 7.5-fold for R211A (Kd = 2.3 ± 0.07 μM) and 12.2-fold for R211E (Kd = 3.2 ± 0.23 μM; Figure 1D).

In order to test the impact of the point mutations on GUN4’s ability to stimulate the MgCh reaction, the purified proteins were subjected to an MgCh-assay containing the recombinant rice subunits CHLH, D and I (Supplementary Figure 1; Zhou et al., 2012). As reported before, the addition of GUN4 (WT) strongly stimulated the MgCh reaction compared to the control reaction without GUN4 (Figure 1E). In contrast, either of the GUN4 point mutants showed diminished stimulation of MgCh and a prolonged lag-phase relative to the reaction with WT GUN4. Despite the overall reduction, we found quantitative differences in the potential to stimulate the MgCh reaction. Both F191A and R211A showed a 50% reduction in the MgCh activity calculated as fluorescence change per minute (ΔF/min) from the slope of the curve (Figure 1E). In contrast, the addition of R211E led to a 70% reduction in MgCh activity (calculated as ΔF/min) and overall limited product formation compared to the GUN4 (WT) reaction.

Complementation of the gun4-2 Knock Out Mutant

To test the impact of the GUN4 point mutations on its function in vivo, we introduced transgenes encoding mutant versions of GUN4 under the control of the endogenous GUN4 promoter into the gun4-2 knockout mutant. All GUN4 variants used in this study were able to at least partially complement the gun4-2 knock out mutant, which is seedling lethal in the absence of an exogenous carbon source (Larkin et al., 2003; Figure 2). Two individual homozygous lines per construct were selected for further analysis (Figures 2A,B). Except for the strong overexpressing R211A line #3, all complementation lines expressed the transgene at least WT-like (Figures 2C, 3A). In addition to the gun4-2 complementation lines, we included the gun4-1 [expressing GUN4(Leu88Phe)] and the T-DNA insertion mutant gun4-3 to our analysis (Peter and Grimm, 2009). These two allelic knockdown mutants showed a pale green phenotype compared to WT plants, with gun4-1 being the stronger compromised allele (Figure 2A). While the gun4-1 mutant accumulated only 60% of WT chlorophyll (Chl) level, gun4-3 accumulated approximately 80% of Chl found in WT leaves (Figure 2D). Expression of F191A led to pale green leaves (Figure 2A) due to diminished Chl accumulation (Figure 2D). This result resembled the phenotype of previously reported independent transgenic lines (Adhikari et al., 2011). In contrast to F191A, a different phenotype was observed for the two complementation lines expressing R211A. While line #1 accumulated approximately 80% of WT Chl level, line #3 markedly overexpressing R211A (Figures 2C, 3A) accumulated WT levels of Chl (Figure 2D). In stark contrast to R211A, R211E lines were visibly growth-retarded (Figure 2A) and accumulated only 20% of WT Chl level (Figure 2D). Interestingly, the expression of R211E compromised the overall Chl accumulation and, in particular, the Chl b content resulting in a drastic change of the Chl a/b ratio compared to the other gun4 mutant lines (Figure 2E). While F191A lines resembled the gun4 knockdown mutants, expression of the R211E variant resulted in the most severe macroscopic phenotype and compromised TPS.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Complementation of the gun4-2 knock out mutant with genomic constructs encoding for GUN4(F191A), GUN4(R211A), and GUN4(R211E). (A) Phenotype of 5-week-old WT (Col-0) and mutant plants grown on soil under short-day conditions at 100 μmol photons– 2 s– 1. In addition, gun4-1 and gun4-3 knock out plants are shown. (B) PCR-based confirmation of the gun4-2 knock out background and presence of the complementation construct in the mutant lines shown in panel (A) using primers for the amplification of the GUN4 WT-allele (WT), the SALK_026911 T-DNA insertion (T-DNA) and the complementation construct (comp.) (C) Expression of GUN4 mRNA relative to Col-0 and SAND as reference gene [2–ddC(t)]. (D) Chlorophyll (Chl) a and b content and (E) Chl a/b ratio. Statistical significance relative to the WT (*p < 0.05) was calculated using one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test with n ≥ 3 (C) and n = 4 (D,E) replicates. Values are given as the mean ± S.D.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Analysis of porphyrin steady-state level, heme content and ALA synthesis capacity in gun4-2 complementation lines expressing GUN4(F191A), GUN4(R211A), and GUN4(R211E). (A) Schematic presentation of the tetrapyrrole biosynthesis, including the intermediates within the Chl branch and the involved enzymes. Abbreviations are given in the main text. Steady state level of (B) Mg-protoporphyin IX (MgP), (C) Mg protoporphyin IX monomethylester (MgPMME), (D) Protochlodophyllide (PChlide), (E) heme, and (F) ALA synthesis capacity (relative to the WT control) in leaves of 21 days old plants grown in short-day (SD). Statistical significance relative to the WT (*p < 0.05) was calculated using one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test with n ≥ 7 (B–E, except R211A#1, n = 4) and n ≥ 7 (D–F) replicates from two independent experiments. Values are given as the mean ± S.D.

The Steady-State Level of TPS Intermediates and 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Synthesis Capacity

Because the lower accumulation of Chl in the GUN4 mutant lines depends on the activity of TPS enzymes, primarily MgCh, we analyzed intermediates of the Chl branch of the pathway in WT and mutant plants (Figure 3A). Overall, the steady-state level of porphyrin intermediates confirmed lower Chl accumulation in each line (Figures 3B–D). The steady-state levels of MgP, Mg protoporphyrin IX monomethylester (MgPMME) and Pchlide, which are the products of the catalytic reactions of MgCh, MgPMT and the cyclase, respectively, were significantly reduced in the gun4-1 and gun4-3 mutants as well as the F191A, R211A#1, and R211E lines. However, a quantitative difference of these TPS metabolites was detectable among the complementation lines. Expression of F191A and R211A resulted in a 40–50% decrease in the steady-state levels. In contrast, in the two independent R211E lines only 5–10% of WT-levels for MgP, MgPMME, and Pchlide were determined (Figures 3B–D). It is important to note that in all the genotypes, the steady-state level for the substrate of the MgCh, PIX, was below the detection limit when analyzed by HPLC. Despite the strong effect on the Chl branch of the TPS, the content of non-covalently bound heme was not affected in any of the mutants under study (Figure 3E). In order to test to which extent the rate-limiting step of TPS is affected by the different GUN4 mutations, ALA synthesis capacity was analyzed. A mild reduction of ALA synthesis was observed for gun4-3 and R211A lines. Significant differences in the ALA synthesis capacity were detected for the mutants with pale-green leaves and low Chl content (i.e., gun4-1, F191A, and R211E lines) (Figure 2). In particular, in both R211E lines, ALA synthesis was diminished by 50–60% compared to Col-0.

Accumulation of TPS Enzymes and Subunits of Photosynthesis and Gene Expression

To analyse if the phenotypic and molecular changes of the substitution mutants (Figures 2, 3) can be explained by transcriptional or post-translational changes, we performed a comprehensive analysis of mRNA expression and the TPS enzyme abundance. Except for the gun4-1 mutant, GUN4 expression and the GUN4 protein content correlated in the different genotypes (Figures 2C, 4A). The key enzymes involved in ALA synthesis, GluTR (HEMA1 and 2) or GSAT, were neither affected on the transcript nor the protein level (Figures 4A–C). Transcripts for the MgCh subunits CHLH, D, and I-1 accumulated at WT-level in all mutants (Figures 4D–F). However, and in agreement with previous results (Wang et al., 2020), CHLH was more abundant in gun4-1 and also in the gun4-2/R211E lines. Although a reduction for CHLM and POR protein was observed, only the transcripts for PORA and B were strongly diminished in the R211E lines (Figures 4I,J). Furthermore, no changes in the accumulation of LHCB1.2 and plastocyanin (PC) mRNA were found in fully developed leaves of the genotypes analyzed here (Figures 4K,L). In addition to the TPS enzymes, the abundance of photosynthetic complex proteins was also analyzed (Figure 4A). Except for R211E#9, only a minor difference in the accumulation of photosystem (PS) II subunits D1 and CP43 was observed. Accumulation of the PSI subunit (PsaL) was impaired in gun4-1 and to a stronger extent in R211E lines. Likewise, the accumulation of LHC antenna proteins (LHCB1 and LHCA1) was diminished in gun4-1, gun4-3, the F191A lines and R211A#1 compared to Col-0 (Figure 4A). In R211E LHCA1 and B1 were barely detectable and accumulated to a lower level compared to the gun4-1 knockdown mutant (Figure 4A). The cytochrome b(6) subunit of the cytochrome b6f complex (PetB) was detected with similar amounts in all lines tested.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Analysis of protein contents and gene expression in 21 day-old gun4-2 complementation lines expressing GUN4(F191A), GUN4(R211A), and GUN4(R211E). (A) Western-blot analysis of enzymes and regulators involved in tetrapyrrole biosynthesis. (B–L) Analysis of mRNA contents by quantitative real-time PCR. Relative expression was calculated relative to Col-0 and SAND as reference gene [2–ddC(t)]. Statistical significance relative to the WT (*p < 0.05) was calculated using one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test with n ≥ 3 replicates. Values are given as the mean ± S.D. Plants were grown for 21 days in short-day (SD) conditions. GUN4, Genomes uncoupled 4; GluTR/HEMA1 and 2, Glutamyl-tRNA reductase; GSAT, Glutamate-1-semialdehyde aminotransferase; CHLH, CHLI(-1), CHLD, subunits of the MgCh; CHLM, MgP methyltransferase; CHL27 and YCF54, subunits of cyclase; PORA and B, Protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase; D1, CP43, PsaL, LHCA1 and B1, photosystem I and II subunits; PetB, Cytochrome b6f complex protein; PC, plastocyanin.

Effect of Short- and Long-Term 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Feeding on Porphyrin and Chlorophyll Accumulation

The strongly diminished TPS observed for some of the complementation lines raised the possibility that a shortage of ALA (Figure 3F) caused the reduced porphyrin and Chl levels and Chl-binding protein contents, particularly in the R211E lines. To test this, 21 days old seedlings were incubated in buffer without or supplemented with 1 mM ALA (Figure 5A). To avoid deleterious effects arising from reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation from elevated porphyrin levels during light exposure, plants were incubated for 20 h in darkness. Because POR is strictly light-dependent in angiosperms, we used the accumulation of its substrate, Pchlide, as a proxy for the consumption of exogenous ALA within the TPS in darkness. ALA feeding of WT leaves resulted in high amounts of Pchlide level, which were increased by approximately 110-fold compared to the steady-state level in the light (Figures 4D, 5A). Exogenous supply of ALA fully complemented Pchlide deficiency (Figure 3D) in the knockdown mutants gun4-1 and gun4-3. In particular, for gun4-1, a relative increase of 300-fold compared to the light Pchlide content was found. Also, F191A lines and the strong overexpressor of R211A#3 accumulated WT-like levels of Pchlide after ALA feeding (Figure 5A). Despite a relative increase after ALA feeding in darkness by 300–400 fold compared to the content in the light, both R211E lines accumulated only 30% of the Pchlide amounts found in the WT after ALA supply (Figure 5A). However, it is noteworthy that none of the lines accumulated the substrate of the MgCh (PIX) or any other intermediate downstream of MgCh (except for Pchlide). In order to test if long-term ALA supply could complement Chl deficiency, plants were grown on MS plates with 250 μM ALA for 14 days in continuous light (Figure 5B). In comparison to control conditions, growth in the presence of ALA did not affect the Chl a and b content in WT, gun4-1, gun4-3 and both R211A lines. Although a significant increase of Chl a for F191A#4 after growth on ALA plates was found, the second line #5 did not show a change in Chl level upon ALA supply. On the contrary, while the Chl b content was not significantly changed, both R211E lines accumulated approximately 25% more Chl a after growth on plates with ALA compared to control plates without ALA (Figure 5B). In an independent experiment, WT, the gun4-2 knockout mutant and R211E lines were grown in the absence or presence of increased amounts of ALA on MS plates supplemented with sucrose in continuous dim-light (Figures 5C,D). In agreement with a previous report (Peter and Grimm, 2009), Chl deficiency of the white gun4-2 mutant can be partially rescued by ALA feeding as indicated by cotyledons becoming pale-green (Figure 5C) and higher maximum Chl fluorescence (Figure 5D) after a saturating light pulse using a PAM-imager. In contrast, ALA supply did not change the low Chl contents and the Fm in the R211E lines compared to WT, thereby confirming the results from ALA-feeding in the absence of sucrose.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Impact of short and long-term ALA feeding on protochlorophyllide (PChlide) and chlorophyll (Chl) accumulation in gun4 mutants. (A) PChlide content of 21 days old seedlings grown in short-day incubated in buffer containing 1 mM ALA for 20 h in darkness (green). The ocre bars indicate the change in PChlide content upon ALA feeding relative to the steady-state level in the light (ratio + ALA/steady-state, right Y-axis). (B) Chl a and b content in WT and mutant plants germinated and grown for 14 days in continuous light on MS plates without (–) or supplemented with 250 μM ALA (+). Statistical significance (*p < 0.05) relative to the WT (in A) or the control condition without ALA (in B) was calculated using student’s t-test with n = 3 replicates. Values are given as the mean ± S.D. (C) Phenotype and (D) maximum Chl fluorescence (Fm) induced by a saturating light pulse after 20 min of dark incubation using a PAM-imager. Increased Chl contents in gun4-2 after ALA feeding are indicated by pale-green cotyledons and higher fluorescence of Chl molecules. Plants were grown on MS media with 1% sucrose without or supplemented with the indicated ALA concentrations in continuous dim-light for 8 days. For gun4-2, seeds of a heterozygous plant were sown, and white GUN4 knockout mutants were selected for the analysis shown.

Comparison of R211E With Other Chlorophyll Deficient Mutants

The analysis of the TPS pathway disclosed that R211E expression resulted in a rather drastic (molecular) phenotype compared to the knockdown mutant gun4-1. We speculated that some aspects of the (molecular) phenotype of R211E mutants were caused by effects independent of GUN4s function in MgCh reaction. Therefore, we compared the R211E lines with a mutant devoid of Chl b due to CHLOROPHYLL A OXYGENASE (cao) deficiency (Figure 6) and mutants for the chloroplast SIGNAL RECOGNITION PARTICLE43 AND 54 complex (ffc/srp54 and chaos/srp43) with impaired integration of Chl-binding proteins into thylakoid membranes (Schuenemann et al., 1998, 1999; Dunschede et al., 2015). The cao mutant was similar growth retarded compared to R211E. Deficient Chl b biosynthesis resulted in ∼80% of WT Chl a level (Figure 6B) but a minor reduction in leaf pigmentation than R211E#4 (Figure 6A). The steady-state levels of MgP and Pchlide were reduced by 60 and 75%, respectively, compared to WT plants, but cao mutants accumulated approximately 1.5–2 fold more porphyrins than the R211E lines (Figures 6C,D). The ALA synthesis capacity was similarly reduced in cao and R211E lines (∼50% of WT level) (Figure 6E). Compared to WT, knockout of SRP43 or SRP54 (Figure 7B) resulted in a 50% reduced Chl a and b content (Figure 6B), strongly diminished steady-state levels of MgP and Pchlide (Figures 6C,D) and a 50% reduction in ALA synthesis capacity (Figure 6E). Except for ALA synthesis, deficiency of either factor alone resulted in higher contents of porphyrins and Chl in chaos and ffc mutants relative to R211E lines. In contrast, deficiency of SRP43 and 54 in the double mutant resulted in R211E-like Chl and porphyrin contents (Figures 6B–D) but an even more substantial reduction of the ALA synthesis capacity (Figure 6E). In agreement with previous reports (Wang et al., 2018), GluTR contents were slightly reduced in the chaos mutant compared to Ler but accumulated to a higher level in ffc than Col-0 WT plants. The cao mutant showed a WT-like level of GluTR (Figure 7B).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Comparison of gun4 mutants with mutants impaired in the accumulation of photosynthesis proteins. (A) Phenotype of 6-week old WT (Col-0) and mutant plants grown on soil under short-day conditions at 100 μmol photons– 2 s– 1. In addition to gun4-1 and the gun4-2/R211E mutant, single and double mutants for the chloroplast signal recognition particle (cpSRP) 43 (chaos) and cpSRP54 (ffc) and the knock out mutant for the chlorophyll a oxygenase (cao) are shown. Chaos mutant is in Ler background. (B) Chl a and b, (C) MgP, (D) PChlide content, and (E) ALA-synthesis capacity in 21 days old plants grown in short-day (SD). Significance groups (*p < 0.05) were calculated using one-way ANOVA and Turkey’s multiple comparison test with n ≥ 5 replicates from two independent experiments. Values are given as the mean ± S.D.

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Accumulation of photosynthetic complexes and proteins in gun4, chlorophyll b deficient cao mutant, and mutants impaired the cpSRP pathway. (A) BN-PAGE analysis of photosynthetic complexes solubilized with 1% ß-dodecyl maltoside from thylakoid membranes extracted from 4 to 5 week-old plants grown on soil-grown under short-day conditions at 100 μmol photons– 2 s– 1. In addition to gun4-1 and the gun4-2/R211E mutant, single and double mutants for the chloroplast signal recognition particle (cpSRP) 43 (chaos) and cpSRP54 (ffc) pathway and the knockout mutant for the chlorophyll a oxygenase (cao) were analyzed. Chaos mutant is in Ler background. Complexes were labeled according to Fu et al. (2007). (B) Accumulation of proteins involved in tetrapyrrole biosynthesis (GUN4 and GluTR), the cpSRP pathway (SRP43, 54, and ALB3), LHCA1 and B1 analyzed by western-blot analysis of denatured protein extracts obtained from 21 days-old plants grown on soil.

To elucidate the impact of strongly compromised TPS in R211E on the accumulation of Chl-binding proteins, thylakoid protein complexes were solubilized and separated on a gradient blue native (BN-) PA-gel under native conditions and were compared to gun4-1, cao, srp43, and srp54 single and double mutants (Figure 7). Compared to WT plants, monomeric PSII (PSII-M) and PSI core were enriched, but contents of trimeric LHC (LHC-T) were reduced in the gun4-1 mutant (Figure 7A). R211E lines also accumulated less LHC-T than the WT, but the content was more drastically diminished than in the gun4-1 knockdown mutant. While PSI-LHCI, PSII dimers (PSII-D) and PSII super complexes (PSII SC) were markedly reduced compared to Col-0, R211E also showed a higher level of PSI core and PSII-M. Furthermore, accumulation of the LHCII assembly complex was more pronounced in all genotypes with altered GUN4 levels or function compared to WT thylakoids (Figure 7A). Deficiency of Chl b biosynthesis caused the complete absence of LHCII-T and a substantial accumulation of PSI core and PSII-M in the cao mutant. Knockout of SRP54 in ffc mutants (Figure 7B) resulted in diminished levels of LHC-T, PSI-LHCI and PSII-D relative to Col-0 (Figure 7A). This effect was even more pronounced in chaos mutants (srp43), showing a substantial decrease of LHC-T, PSI-LHCI, and PSII-D complexes. Also, strong overaccumulation of the PSI core complex relative to the Ler thylakoids was observed in chaos. Intriguingly, however, when both SRP43 and 54 were absent (Figure 7B), the composition of thylakoid protein complexes of chaos ffc double mutant resembled that of the R211E lines (Figure 7A). Altered accumulation of LHCI and LHCII containing protein complexes in the various genotypes was confirmed by SDS-PAGE analysis using antibodies specific for the LHCA1 and LHCB1 family protein (Figure 7B). The chaos ffc double mutant and R211E lines accumulated similar, though drastically reduced levels of LHC proteins relative to WT plants. None of the mutants with altered accumulation or function of GUN4 showed a difference in the accumulation of SRP43, 54, or the ALB3 insertase compared to WT plants (Figure 7B). Therefore, the impaired accumulation of Chl-binding proteins in the R211E lines is not explained by a differential accumulation of SRP components.

Discussion

Effects of GENOMES UNCOUPLED 4 Porphyrin-Binding on Magnesium Chelatase and TPS

In agreement with previous studies on Synechocystis and Arabidopsis GUN4, mutation of the highly conserved AtF191 and AtR211 resulted in the lower affinity of GUN4 toward porphyrins (Figure 1; Verdecia et al., 2005; Adhikari et al., 2009). As shown for Synechocystis MgCh and GUN4 (Verdecia et al., 2005), stimulation of rice MgCh is also affected by the GUN4 point mutations confirming the importance of these amino acids for plant GUN4 in vitro. Although MgP binding was more severely diminished, binding of the GUN4 point mutants to PIX was also affected. Altered MgP binding to SynGUN4 was previously correlated with reduced MgCh activity (Verdecia et al., 2005), but we cannot conclude from our assays if altered binding to PIX or MgP of GUN4 caused diminished MgCh activity (Figure 1). However, among the different GUN4 versions tested, we found a quantitative difference in the potential to stimulate MgCh. While the R211A protein showed lower affinity toward PIX and MgP compared to F191A, both GUN4 mutants led to similarly reduced MgCh activity (Figure 1). Only for the two R211 substitution mutants, a correlation between porphyrin-binding and MgCh activity was found (Figure 1). In agreement with their general potential to stimulate MgCh in vitro, all point mutants at least partially complemented the white phenotype of GUN4 knockout mutants (Larkin et al., 2003; Peter and Grimm, 2009). Diminished MgCh activity in vitro correlated well with the reduced steady-state level of TPS intermediates downstream of the MgCh reaction in the complementation lines (Figure 3), which have also been observed in a Synechocystis strain expressing GUN4-W192A mutant with altered porphyrin binding abilities (Kopecna et al., 2015). In the R211A#3 line, overexpression of GUN4 (Figures 2, 4) most likely compensated for the perturbed function of GUN4, thereby leading to elevated porphyrin steady-state level compared to the R211A#1 line and WT like Chl level and phenotype (Figures 24). Despite the overall correlation between the in vitro and in vivo results, expression of the different GUN4 versions led to phenotypic differences, which cannot solely be explained by altered porphyrin-binding. For instance, the F191A version was less affected in porphyrin-binding compared to R211A (Figure 1), but the expression of F191A resulted in a more severe reduction of ALA synthesis, Chl contents (Figure 2), LHC protein abundance (Figure 4) and development of pale leaves (Figure 2) compared to the R211A#1 mutant. Considering the equally compromised binding to thylakoid membranes and MgCh (Adhikari et al., 2009, 2011), the differences in the (molecular) phenotypes of F191A and R211A lines analyzed in the present study are not only explained by lowered porphyrin-binding to GUN4. In addition, R211A and R211E lines showed entirely different phenotypes despite comparable effects on in vitro porphyrin binding (Figure 1). While R211A (almost) fully complement the gun4-2 mutant, even slight overexpression of R211E led to only very low porphyrin and Chl level, accumulation of Chl-binding proteins (Figures 4, 7) and strongly impaired growth (Figure 2). Furthermore, expression of R211E led to more severe growth retardation and pale green leaves than observed for gun4-1 (Figure 2), indicating that exchange of R211 to glutamate compromised TPS and Chl accumulation even more substantial than the strong knockdown of GUN4 in gun4-1. Interestingly, all genotypes with apparent changes in leaf coloration (i.e., gun4-1, F191A, and R211E) were characterized by significantly reduced ALA synthesis rates (Figure 3), suggesting that diminished ALA biosynthesis contributes to the low TPS intermediate levels and the development of pale green leaves, particularly in R211E lines. However, short term ALA feeding in darkness did not restore Pchlide level to WT-like amounts in R211E (Figure 5). In agreement with this, a gun4-2 knock out mutant also showed diminished conversion of the precursor to porphyrins when fed with ALA for 24h in darkness (Peter and Grimm, 2009). Because ALA could partially rescue Chl deficiency of gun4-2 (Figures 5C,D; Peter and Grimm, 2009), but long-term ALA supply had only a minor impact on Chl accumulation in R211E lines (Figure 5), it could be speculated that metabolization of ALA was disturbed in the R211E lines. On the other hand, the presence of R211E could also affect the conversion of Pchlide, downstream Chl synthesis or integration into Chl-binding proteins and, thus, would prevent the accumulation of Chl in Chl-binding proteins of the R211E lines. Indeed, decreased expression of PORA and B and reduced accumulation of POR proteins (Figure 4) limits Chl synthesis and certainly contributes to the pale green phenotype of R211E. Although major components of the cpSRP pathway for LHC integration into thylakoid membranes accumulated at WT level in R211E (Figure 7), we cannot rule out that GUN4 may also affect the accumulation of LHCs downstream of Chl (b) synthesis through post-translational mechanisms involving the interaction with SRP43 as it has been recently reported (Ji et al., 2021). When the integration of LHCs into thylakoid membranes is perturbed, apo-LHC and Chl b cannot be stabilized. However, strong GUN4 knockdown in gun4-1 and expression of R211E led to an increase in the Chl a/b ratio compared to WT plants (Figure 2; Mochizuki et al., 2001) which was even more pronounced compared to mutants impaired in the LHC integration pathway (Figure 6; Wang and Grimm, 2016). This finding suggests that, in particular, the step of Chl b synthesis, catalyzed by CAO, could be compromised in GUN4 deficient or R211E expressing mutants. Due to the interdependency of Chl b synthesis and LHC accumulation (Espineda et al., 1999), strongly diminished Chl b content is most likely responsible for the marked decrease of LHC proteins in gun4-1 and R211E (Figures 4, 7). Future analysis will reveal if a mutual connection between GUN4 and the step of Chl b synthesis exists and whether the mutation of R211 affects CAO on the transcriptional or post-translational level.

GENOMES UNCOUPLED 4:Porphyrin and the Connection With 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Synthesis

5-Aminolevulinic acid synthesis is the rate-limiting step for the biosynthesis of tetrapyrroles, and tight control of ALA formation ensures the biosynthesis of appropriate amounts of TPS intermediates and end products for the integration into Chl-binding proteins (Tanaka et al., 2011; Richter and Grimm, 2019). Several transcriptional and post-translational regulation mechanisms have been reported that tune the activity of enzymes involved in ALA synthesis, among which GluTR is the target of multiple regulatory events (for example, Terry and Kendrick, 1999; Meskauskiene et al., 2001; Goslings et al., 2004; Hou et al., 2018; Richter et al., 2019). Although mechanistic details are unknown, the downregulation of ALA synthesis in mutants of MgCh and downstream enzymes (Papenbrock et al., 2000; Alawady and Grimm, 2005; Wang et al., 2020) might function to prevent the accumulation of TPS intermediates and the formation of ROS. No (direct) physical interaction of GUN4 with enzymes of ALA synthesis has been reported. However, a close connection between GUN4 and ALA synthesis in Arabidopsis gun4 knockdown mutants (low ALA synthesis capacity) (Figure 3; Peter and Grimm, 2009; Wang et al., 2020) and tobacco GUN4 overexpression lines (stimulated ALA synthesis) was found (Peter and Grimm, 2009). Also, mutants with impaired regulation of MgCh activity through GUN4 phosphorylation (Richter et al., 2016) or knockout of the GUN4 interacting BALANCE of CHLOROPHYLL METABOLISM1 (BCM1) protein needed for maximum MgCh activity (Wang et al., 2020) showed diminished ALA synthesis rates compared to WT plants. Based on the experimental data published, GUN4 may function in the regulation of ALA synthesis until it is inactivated upon porphyrin accumulation (Peter and Grimm, 2009). Hence, it could be speculated that the function of GUN4 to adjust ALA synthesis depends on its ability to bind porphyrins. However, F191A and R211E did not accumulate PIX, the substrate of the MgCh reaction, and showed reduced ALA synthesis (Figure 3). Also, F191A lines showed significantly reduced ALA synthesis rates despite an R211A like porphyrin binding and stimulation of MgCh in vitro (Figure 1). We also found that R211A and R211E mutations impaired porphyrin binding to GUN4 and MgCh activation in vivo and in vitro (Figures 1, 3), but only R211E lines showed significantly reduced ALA synthesis rates (Figure 3). Although we cannot exclude that the minor difference in porphyrin-binding to R211E relative to R211A (Figure 1) might explain the different impact on ALA synthesis, it seems unlikely that the GUN4:porphyrin complex plays a direct role in controlling ALA synthesis. WT-like expression of HEMA1 and 2 or GSAT mRNAs and accumulation of the corresponding enzymes (Figure 4) in the different mutants indicated that impaired porphyrin-binding to GUN4 did not adjust the expression of ALA synthesis enzymes. Therefore, downregulation of ALA synthesis was mediated through a post-translational mechanism independent of GUN4’s porphyrin-binding abilities (Figure 4). Because ALA synthesis was significantly reduced in all genotypes with a strongly altered accumulation of Chl-binding proteins and photosynthetic complexes (Figure 7), diminished ALA synthesis could also be explained by reduced photosynthetic activity or accumulation/function of photosynthetic complexes. For example, strong knockdown of GUN4 in gun4-1 and expression of F191A and R211E led to impaired Chl b accumulation (relative to Chl a), and ALA synthesis in Chl b deficient cao mutant resembled that of R211E (Figure 6). Therefore, a mutual connection between CAO activity and GUN4 could exist, and diminished ALA synthesis would be a consequence of altered Chl b biosynthesis or the reduced accumulation of Chl-binding proteins. On the other hand, the lack of SRP43 and 54 also led to markedly decreased ALA synthesis capacity (Figure 7; Wang et al., 2018), and R211E lines resembled the chaos ffc double mutant. Given the physical interaction of SRP43 with GluTR (Wang et al., 2018) and GUN4 (Ji et al., 2021) and diminished GUN4 contents and ALA synthesis in srp43 mutant (Figure 7; Ji et al., 2021), it would be of future interest to test whether the interaction of GUN4 with SRP components is modified by F191A or R211E mutations thereby leading to reduced ALA synthesis (Figure 7). In addition, knockout of BCM1, which also interacts with GluTR, resulted in lower ALA synthesis capacity compared to WT plants, and ALA formation depends on both GUN4 and BCM1 (Wang et al., 2020). Hence, it could be speculated that F191A and R211E mutations affect the interaction of GUN4 with BCM1 resulting in reduced ALA synthesis capacity in F191A and R211E. Future analysis of GUN4 point mutants will reveal how these amino acids affect the interaction with the different partners and how these interactions are connected to the regulation of ALA synthesis. To this end, direct interaction analysis using microscale thermophoresis or pull-down assays with recombinant proteins and CoIP experiments with plant extracts could be performed. Furthermore, interaction assays between MgCh subunits and the different GUN4 variants in the presence and absence of porphyrins will show how the mutation of conserved amino acids – particularly R211E – influences GUN4’s potential to interact with MgCh subunits.

Altered Porphyrin-Binding Has No Impact on GENOMES UNCOUPLED 4 and TPS Enzyme Stability

Previous work on GUN4 deficient Arabidopsis mutants revealed a critical role of GUN4 during growth in light/dark cycles (Larkin et al., 2003; Peter and Grimm, 2009). The accumulation of unbound porphyrin intermediates is a significant threat to plants (for example, Meskauskiene et al., 2001; Peter et al., 2010) because excited porphyrins can return to their ground state by energy transfer to molecular oxygen, thereby promoting the formation of singlet oxygen. The highly reactive singlet oxygen interferes with the function of various biomolecules (Kim et al., 2008) and can even stimulate the genetically encoded programmed cell death (Meskauskiene et al., 2001; Kim and Apel, 2013). Previously, it was hypothesized that GUN4 might function as a buffer for excessive porphyrins, and efficient shielding of porphyrins from the interaction with molecular oxygen could diminish the phototoxic effects arising from unbound porphyrin accumulation (Peter and Grimm, 2009; Adhikari et al., 2011; Li et al., 2021). This hypothesis is further supported by GUN4’s ability to bind various TPS pathway intermediates (Adhikari et al., 2009; Hu et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021). The modification or degradation of the GUN4:porphyrin complex was proposed as an efficient way to catabolize a surplus of TPS intermediates. Also, lowered content or degradation products of GUN4 could function as a signal for the downregulation of ALA synthesis to avoid further accumulation of porphyrins (Peter and Grimm, 2009) or to permit the adjustment of nuclear gene expression by plastid-to-nucleus communication pathways (Brzezowski et al., 2014). These proposed functions of the GUN4:porphyrin complex imply that GUN4 is degraded upon porphyrin binding in light. However, based on the in vivo analysis of porphyrin-binding mutants of GUN4 (Figures 1, 2), no correlation between the stability and GUN4’s porphyrin-binding abilities was found. In all the analyzed genotypes, the expression of the transgenes (Figure 2C) correlated with the accumulation of GUN4 protein (Figure 4A). This finding is in agreement with stable GUN4 contents after the accumulation of high amounts of porphyrins induced by ALA feeding of Arabidopsis WT leaves (Richter et al., 2019). However, Adhikari et al. (2011) reported that porphyrin-binding deficient F191A and R211A expressed in gun4-2 were degraded while the WT GUN4 remained stable upon high light (HL) shift. Because the GUN4-1 mutant protein with increased affinity for porphyrins (Davison et al., 2005) was similarly degraded in HL treated gun4-1 mutants (Adhikari et al., 2011), GUN4 degradation upon HL shift is most likely not connected to the formation of GUN4:porphyrin complexes. More recently, a stabilizing effect of GUN4 on the MgCh H1 subunit in the presence of PIX, biliverdin (BV) and other linear tetrapyrroles was reported in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Hu et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021). Also, for Synechocystis, a connection between porphyrin binding to GUN4 and accumulation of CHLH after recovery from nitrogen depletion has been reported (Kopecna et al., 2015). In contrast to unicellular organisms, Arabidopsis gun4 mutants accumulated at least WT like CHLH amounts (Figure 4A) and CHLH is not destabilized in, for example, R211E lines expressing GUN4 with strongly impaired porphyrin binding (Figure 4A). Although bilin binding to AtGUN4 was reported and binding to Synechocystis GUN4 depends on the conserved amino acids involved in binding of porphyrin intermediates (Hu et al., 2021), we propose that the GUN4:porphyrin complexes do not determine the stability of MgCh subunits in higher plants. This assumption is further supported by previous analysis of gun4-2 expressing either F191A or R211A (Adhikari et al., 2011). After shifting plants from growth light to high light intensities, the abundance of the GUN4 variants with altered porphyrin binding decreased, but CHLH contents remained stable (Adhikari et al., 2011). Furthermore, knockout of GUN4 led to post-translational destabilization of MgPMT (CHLM) and POR, indicating a function of GUN4 on enzymes downstream of MgCh (Peter and Grimm, 2009). Contents of MgPMT and POR were also reduced in the R211E lines but accumulated to WT-like level in R211A or F191A lines (Figure 4A). Hence, diminished contents of these two enzymes cannot be solely explained by altered porphyrin-binding to GUN4. Instead, the reduced expression of PORA and B in R211E (Figure 4A) explained the lower contents of POR. However, it remained open if the changed POR expression is a direct consequence of perturbed GUN4 function or strongly impaired Chl biosynthesis and its consequences in R211E lines (e.g., accumulation of Chl-binding proteins) (Figures 6, 7).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author Contributions

ASR conceived and supervised the experiments and wrote the article. VF, CG, and ASR performed the experiments. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.

Funding

The work in the lab of ASR is supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) to ASR (INST 86/2042-1, TRR175, project C06).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Bernhard Grimm for helpful discussions and critical comments on the manuscript.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.850504/full#supplementary-material

References

Adams, N. B. P., Bisson, C., Brindley, A. A., Farmer, D. A., Davison, P. A., Reid, J. D., et al. (2020). The active site of magnesium chelatase. Nat. Plants 6, 1491–1502.

Google Scholar

Adhikari, N. D., Froehlich, J. E., Strand, D. D., Buck, S. M., Kramer, D. M., and Larkin, R. M. (2011). GUN4-porphyrin complexes bind the ChlH/GUN5 subunit of Mg-Chelatase and promote chlorophyll biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 23, 1449–1467. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.082503

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Adhikari, N. D., Orler, R., Chory, J., Froehlich, J. E., and Larkin, R. M. (2009). Porphyrins promote the association of GENOMES UNCOUPLED 4 and a Mg-chelatase subunit with chloroplast membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 24783–24796. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.025205

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alawady, A. E., and Grimm, B. (2005). Tobacco Mg protoporphyrin IX methyltransferase is involved in inverse activation of Mg porphyrin and protoheme synthesis. Plant J. 41, 282–290. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02291.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brzezowski, P., Richter, A. S., and Grimm, B. (2015). Regulation and function of tetrapyrrole biosynthesis in plants and algae. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1847, 968–985. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2015.05.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brzezowski, P., Schlicke, H., Richter, A., Dent, R. M., Niyogi, K. K., and Grimm, B. (2014). The GUN4 protein plays a regulatory role in tetrapyrrole biosynthesis and chloroplast-to-nucleus signalling in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant J. 79, 285–298. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12560

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, X., Pu, H., Fang, Y., Wang, X., Zhao, S., Lin, Y., et al. (2015a). Crystal structure of the catalytic subunit of magnesium chelatase. Nat. Plants 1:15125. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2015.125

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, X., Pu, H., Wang, X., Long, W., Lin, R., and Liu, L. (2015b). Crystal structures of GUN4 in complex with porphyrins. Mol. Plant 8, 1125–1127. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.04.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Davison, P. A., Schubert, H. L., Reid, J. D., Iorg, C. D., Heroux, A., Hill, C. P., et al. (2005). Structural and biochemical characterization of Gun4 suggests a mechanism for its role in chlorophyll biosynthesis. Biochemistry 44, 7603–7612. doi: 10.1021/bi050240x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dunschede, B., Trager, C., Schroder, C. V., Ziehe, D., Walter, B., Funke, S., et al. (2015). Chloroplast SRP54 was recruited for posttranslational protein transport via complex formation with chloroplast SRP43 during land plant evolution. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 13104–13114. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.597922

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Espineda, C. E., Linford, A. S., Devine, D., and Brusslan, J. A. (1999). The AtCAO gene, encoding chlorophyll a oxygenase, is required for chlorophyll b synthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 10507–10511. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10507

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Formighieri, C., Ceol, M., Bonente, G., Rochaix, J. D., and Bassi, R. (2012). Retrograde signaling and photoprotection in a gun4 mutant of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Mol. Plant 5, 1242–1262. doi: 10.1093/mp/sss051

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fu, A., He, Z., Cho, H. S., Lima, A., Buchanan, B. B., and Luan, S. (2007). A chloroplast cyclophilin functions in the assembly and maintenance of photosystem II in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 15947–15952. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707851104

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, Y. S., Wang, Y. L., Wang, X., and Liu, L. (2020). Hexameric structure of the ATPase motor subunit of magnesium chelatase in chlorophyll biosynthesis. Protein Sci. 29, 1040–1046. doi: 10.1002/pro.3816

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goslings, D., Meskauskiene, R., Kim, C., Lee, K. P., Nater, M., and Apel, K. (2004). Concurrent interactions of heme and FLU with Glu tRNA reductase (HEMA1), the target of metabolic feedback inhibition of tetrapyrrole biosynthesis, in dark- and light-grown Arabidopsis plants. Plant J. 40, 957–967. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02262.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hou, Z., Yang, Y., Hedtke, B., and Grimm, B. (2018). Fluorescence in blue light (FLU) is involved in inactivation and localization of glutamyl-tRNA reductase during light exposure. Plant J. 97, 517–529. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14138

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, J. H., Chang, J. W., Xu, T., Wang, J., Wang, X., Lin, R., et al. (2021). Structural basis of bilin binding by the chlorophyll biosynthesis regulator GUN4. Protein Sci. 30, 2083–2091. doi: 10.1002/pro.4164

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ji, S., Siegel, A., Shan, S. O., Grimm, B., and Wang, P. (2021). Chloroplast SRP43 autonomously protects chlorophyll biosynthesis proteins against heat shock. Nat. Plants 7, 1420–1432. doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00994-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kelley, L. A., Mezulis, S., Yates, C. M., Wass, M. N., and Sternberg, M. J. (2015). The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 10, 845–858. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, C., and Apel, K. (2013). 1O2-Mediated and EXECUTER-Dependent retrograde plastid-to-nucleus signaling in norflurazon-treated seedlings of arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant 6, 1580–1591. doi: 10.1093/mp/sst020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, C., Meskauskiene, R., Apel, K., and Laloi, C. (2008). No single way to understand singlet oxygen signalling in plants. EMBO Rep. 9, 435–439. doi: 10.1038/embor.2008.57

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kopecna, J., Cabeza de Vaca, I., Adams, N. B., Davison, P. A., Brindley, A. A., Hunter, C. N., et al. (2015). Porphyrin binding to Gun4 protein, facilitated by a flexible loop, controls metabolite flow through the chlorophyll biosynthetic pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 28477–28488. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.664987

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Laible, M., and Boonrod, K. (2009). Homemade site directed mutagenesis of whole plasmids. J. Vis. Exp. 27:e1135. doi: 10.3791/1135

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Larkin, R. M., Alonso, J. M., Ecker, J. R., and Chory, J. (2003). GUN4, a regulator of chlorophyll synthesis and intracellular signaling. Science 299, 902–906. doi: 10.1126/science.1079978

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, R. Q., Jiang, M., Huang, J. Z. I, Moller, M., and Shu, Q. Y. (2021). Mutations of the genomes uncoupled 4 gene cause ROS accumulation and repress expression of peroxidase genes in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 12:682453. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.682453

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lundqvist, J., Elmlund, H., Wulff, R. P., Berglund, L., Elmlund, D., Emanuelsson, C., et al. (2010). ATP-induced conformational dynamics in the AAA+ motor unit of magnesium chelatase. Structure 18, 354–365. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2010.01.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meskauskiene, R., Nater, M., Goslings, D., Kessler, F., Camp, R., and Apel, K. (2001). FLU: a negative regulator of chlorophyll biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 12826–12831. doi: 10.1073/pnas.221252798

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mochizuki, N., Brusslan, J. A., Larkin, R., Nagatani, A., and Chory, J. (2001). Arabidopsis genomes uncoupled 5 (GUN5) mutant reveals the involvement of Mg-chelatase H subunit in plastid-to-nucleus signal transduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 2053–2058. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.4.2053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mochizuki, N., Tanaka, R., Grimm, B., Masuda, T., Moulin, M., Smith, A. G., et al. (2010). The cell biology of tetrapyrroles: a life and death struggle. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 488–498. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.05.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moulin, M., and Smith, A. G. (2005). Regulation of tetrapyrrole biosynthesis in higher plants. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 33(Pt 4), 737–742. doi: 10.1042/bst0330737

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oñate-Sánchez, L., and Vicente-Carbajosa, J. (2008). DNA-free RNA isolation protocols for Arabidopsis thaliana, including seeds and siliques. BMC Res. Notes 1:93. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-1-93

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Papenbrock, J., Mock, H. P., Tanaka, R., Kruse, E., and Grimm, B. (2000). Role of magnesium chelatase activity in the early steps of the tetrapyrrole biosynthetic pathway. Plant Physiol. 122, 1161–1169. doi: 10.1104/pp.122.4.1161

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peng, L., Shimizu, H., and Shikanai, T. (2008). The chloroplast NAD(P)H dehydrogenase complex interacts with photosystem I in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 34873–34879. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M803207200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peter, E., and Grimm, B. (2009). GUN4 is required for posttranslational control of plant tetrapyrrole biosynthesis. Mol. Plant 2, 1198–1210. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssp072

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peter, E., Rothbart, M., Oelze, M. L., Shalygo, N., Dietz, K. J., and Grimm, B. (2010). Mg protoporphyrin monomethylester cyclase deficiency and effects on tetrapyrrole metabolism in different light conditions. Plant Cell Physiol. 51, 1229–1241. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcq071

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Richter, A., and Grimm, B. (2019). The multifaceted regulation of 5-aminolevulinic acid synthesis. Numerous ways to control glutamyl-tRNA reductase. Adv. Botanical Res. 91, 69–87. doi: 10.1016/bs.abr.2018.12.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Richter, A. S., Banse, C., and Grimm, B. (2019). The GluTR-binding protein is the heme-binding factor for feedback control of glutamyl-tRNA reductase. Elife 8:e46300. doi: 10.7554/eLife.46300

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Richter, A. S., and Grimm, B. (2013). Thiol-based redox control of enzymes involved in the tetrapyrrole biosynthesis pathway in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 4:371. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00371

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Richter, A. S., Hochheuser, C., Fufezan, C., Heinze, L., Kuhnert, F., and Grimm, B. (2016). Phosphorylation of GENOMES UNCOUPLED 4 alters stimulation of Mg chelatase activity in angiosperms. Plant Physiol. 172, 1578–1595. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Richter, A. S., Peter, E., Rothbart, M., Schlicke, H., Toivola, J., Rintamaki, E., et al. (2013). Posttranslational influence of NADPH-dependent thioredoxin reductase C on enzymes in tetrapyrrole synthesis. Plant Physiol. 162, 63–73. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.217141

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Scharfenberg, M., Mittermayr, L., Roepenack-Lahaye, E. V., Schlicke, H., Grimm, B., Leister, D., et al. (2015). Functional characterization of the two ferrochelatases in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ. 38, 280–298. doi: 10.1111/pce.12248

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schlicke, H., Hartwig, A. S., Firtzlaff, V., Richter, A. S., Glasser, C., Maier, K., et al. (2014). Induced deactivation of genes encoding chlorophyll biosynthesis enzymes disentangles tetrapyrrole-mediated retrograde signaling. Mol. Plant 7, 1211–1227. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssu034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schuenemann, D., Amin, P., and Hoffman, N. E. (1999). Functional divergence of the plastid and cytosolic forms of the 54-kDa subunit of signal recognition particle. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 254, 253–258. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1998.9923

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schuenemann, D., Gupta, S., Persello-Cartieaux, F., Klimyuk, V. I., Jones, J. D., Nussaume, L., et al. (1998). A novel signal recognition particle targets light-harvesting proteins to the thylakoid membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 10312–10316. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.17.10312

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sobotka, R., Duhring, U., Komenda, J., Peter, E., Gardian, Z., Tichy, M., et al. (2008). Importance of the cyanobacterial Gun4 protein for chlorophyll metabolism and assembly of photosynthetic complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 25794–25802. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M803787200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Susek, R. E., Ausubel, F. M., and Chory, J. (1993). Signal transduction mutants of Arabidopsis uncouple nuclear CAB and RBCS gene expression from chloroplast development. Cell 74, 787–799. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90459-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tanaka, R., Kobayashi, K., and Masuda, T. (2011). Tetrapyrrole metabolism in arabidopsis thaliana. Arabidopsis Book 9:e0145. doi: 10.1199/tab.0145

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tanaka, R., and Tanaka, A. (2007). Tetrapyrrole biosynthesis in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 58, 321–346. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105448

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tarahi Tabrizi, S., Langley, D. B., Harrop, S. J., Duff, A. P., and Willows, R. D. (2015). Structure of GUN4 from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Acta Crystallogr. F Struct. Biol. Commun. 71(Pt 8), 1094–1099. doi: 10.1107/S2053230X15012248

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tarahi Tabrizi, S., Sawicki, A., Zhou, S., Luo, M., and Willows, R. D. (2016). GUN4-protoporphyrin IX is a singlet oxygen generator with consequences for plastid retrograde signalling. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 8978–8984. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C116.719989

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Terry, M. J., and Kendrick, R. E. (1999). Feedback inhibition of chlorophyll synthesis in the phytochrome chromophore-deficient aurea and yellow-green-2 mutants of tomato. Plant Physiol. 119, 143–152. doi: 10.1104/pp.119.1.143

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Verdecia, M. A., Larkin, R. M., Ferrer, J. L., Riek, R., Chory, J., and Noel, J. P. (2005). Structure of the Mg-chelatase cofactor GUN4 reveals a novel hand-shaped fold for porphyrin binding. PLoS Biol. 3:e151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030151

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, P., and Grimm, B. (2016). Comparative analysis of light-harvesting antennae and state transition in chlorina and cpSRP mutants. Plant Physiol. 172, 1519–1531. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, P., and Grimm, B. (2021). Connecting chlorophyll metabolism with accumulation of the photosynthetic apparatus. Trends Plant Sci. 26, 484–495. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2020.12.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, P., Liang, F. C., Wittmann, D., Siegel, A., Shan, S. O., and Grimm, B. (2018). Chloroplast SRP43 acts as a chaperone for glutamyl-tRNA reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme in tetrapyrrole biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, E3588–E3596. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1719645115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, P., Richter, A. S., Kleeberg, J. R. W., Geimer, S., and Grimm, B. (2020). Post-translational coordination of chlorophyll biosynthesis and breakdown by BCMs maintains chlorophyll homeostasis during leaf development. Nat. Commun. 11:1254. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14992-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wilde, A., Mikolajczyk, S., Alawady, A., Lokstein, H., and Grimm, B. (2004). The gun4 gene is essential for cyanobacterial porphyrin metabolism. FEBS Lett. 571, 119–123. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.06.063

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wittmann, D., Sinha, N., and Grimm, B. (2021). Thioredoxin-dependent control balances the metabolic activities of tetrapyrrole biosynthesis. Biol. Chem. 402, 379–397. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2020-0308

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, W., Willows, R. D., Deng, R., Li, Z., Li, M., Wang, Y., et al. (2021). Bilin-dependent regulation of chlorophyll biosynthesis by GUN4. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118:e2104443118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2104443118

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, S., Sawicki, A., Willows, R. D., and Luo, M. (2012). C-terminal residues of Oryza sativa GUN4 are required for the activation of the ChlH subunit of magnesium chelatase in chlorophyll synthesis. FEBS Lett. 586, 205–210. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.12.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: GUN4, porphyrin, tetrapyrrole biosynthesis, post-translation, regulation

Citation: Fölsche V, Großmann C and Richter AS (2022) Impact of Porphyrin Binding to GENOMES UNCOUPLED 4 on Tetrapyrrole Biosynthesis in planta. Front. Plant Sci. 13:850504. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.850504

Received: 07 January 2022; Accepted: 16 February 2022;
Published: 15 March 2022.

Edited by:

Tatsuru Masuda, The University of Tokyo, Japan

Reviewed by:

Koichi Kobayashi, Osaka Prefecture University, Japan
Roman Sobotka, Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (ASCR), Czechia

Copyright © 2022 Fölsche, Großmann and Richter. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Andreas S. Richter, YW5kcmVhcy5yaWNodGVyQHVuaS1yb3N0b2NrLmRl

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.