Jui-Tse Chang
Chien-Ti Chao1
Pei-Chun Liao
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
- 1School of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
- 2Botanic Garden, Field Science Center for Northern Biosphere, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
- 3Department of Anthropology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, United States
by Chang J-T, Chao C-T, Nakamura K, Liu H-L, Luo M-X and Liao P-C (2022) Front. Plant Sci. 13:824158. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.824158
In the published article, there was an error in Figure 4 as published. The draft of measured leaf trait was modified from journal which figure usage was not CC-BY. Therefore, the original modification was not allowed without permission, and the new figure should be provided.
There was also an error in the caption for Figure 4. The updated draft did not modify the figure from Setoguchi et al., 2009. We have corrected Figure 4 and its caption.
FIGURE 4
Figure 4 Morphometrics of leaf, leaflet, seed, and megasporophyll. The number block is the sample size. The ratio is calculated as the length divided by the width. The black and red stars are not significant and significant, respectively, diagnostic traits between Cycas revoluta and Cycas taitungensis. The draft of the measured organ is modified from Li and Keng (1975). Insert. angle, insertion angle; Leaflet num. per side, leaflet number per side; Mega. lateral spine num., megasporophyll lateral spine number; Mega. length, megasporophyll lamina length; Mega. ratio, megasporophyll lamina ratio; Mega. width, megasporophyll lamina width. The part labels a-q are the plant trait corresponding to depiction and Table 2.
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: continental island, Cycas, Kuroshio, long distance dispersal, speciation, species concept
Citation: Chang J-T, Chao C-T, Nakamura K, Liu H-L, Luo M-X and Liao P-C (2023) Corrigendum: Divergence with gene flow and contrasting population size blur the species boundary in Cycas Sect. Asiorientales, as inferred from morphology and RAD-seq data. Front. Plant Sci. 13:1081728. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1081728
Received: 27 October 2022; Accepted: 19 December 2022;
Published: 12 January 2023.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Angelica Cibrian-Jaramillo, Instituto Politecnico Nacional de México (CINVESTAV), MexicoCopyright © 2023 Chang, Chao, Nakamura, Liu, Luo and Liao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Pei-Chun Liao, cGNsaWFvQG50bnUuZWR1LnR3