Jamil Chowdhury1,2*†
Jannatul Ferdous2
Jenna Lihavainen1
Benedicte Riber Albrectsen1
Judith Lundberg-Felten2*- 1Umeå Plant Science Center, Department of Plant Physiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- 2Umeå Plant Science Center, Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden
Proanthocyanidins (PAs) are polymeric phenolic compounds found in plants and used in many industrial applications. Despite strong evidence of herbivore and pathogen resistance-related properties of PAs, their in planta function is not fully understood. Determining the location and dynamics of PAs in plant tissues and cellular compartments is crucial to understand their mode of action. Such an approach requires microscopic localization with fluorescent dyes that specifically bind to PAs. Such dyes have hitherto been lacking. Here, we show that 4-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde (DMACA) can be used as a PA-specific fluorescent dye that allows localization of PAs at high resolution in cell walls and inside cells using confocal microscopy, revealing features of previously unreported wall-bound PAs. We demonstrate several novel usages of DMACA as a fluorophore by taking advantage of its double staining compatibility with other fluorescent dyes. We illustrate the use of the dye alone and its co-localization with cell wall polymers in different Populus root tissues. The easy-to-use fluorescent staining method, together with its high photostability and compatibility with other fluorogenic dyes, makes DMACA a valuable tool for uncovering the biological function of PAs at a cellular level in plant tissues. DMACA can also be used in other plant tissues than roots, however care needs to be taken when tissues contain compounds that autofluoresce in the red spectral region which can be confounded with the PA-specific DMACA signal.
Introduction
Proanthocyanidins (PAs or condensed tannins) are ubiquitous plant-defense-related secondary metabolites of phenolic nature commonly found in woody plants and forest trees (Ferreira and Li, 2000). PAs are end-products of the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway. They are composed of oligomeric and/or polymeric units of flavan-3-ol monomers, with catechin and epicatechin being the basic building blocks (Rue et al., 2017; Rauf et al., 2019). Although PA structures vary greatly between plant species, they are generally classified as A-type or B-type PAs based on their detailed chemical structure (Ferreira and Slade, 2002). B-type PAs can be converted to A-type PAs by oxidation. The central vacuole is thought to be the primary location of deposition after biosynthesis (Dixon and Sarnala, 2020). Increasing evidence suggests that a considerable number of PAs are also potentially cross-linked with cell wall polymers (Dixon and Sarnala, 2020). The biosynthesis of PAs is relatively well understood (Zhao and Dixon, 2009; Zhao, 2015; James et al., 2017). The transport of PA precursors and the cellular localization of polymerization reactions may, however, depend on the plant species studied and needs further investigation (Dixon and Sarnala, 2020). The authors of the latter review have emphasized poplar as an ideal plant species for this, alongside with tea and grapevine. Evidence is accumulating that PAs play an important in planta role in plant protection, e.g., acting against leaf-eating herbivores, fungal pathogens and abiotic stress (UV protection) (Constabel et al., 2014; Dixon and Sarnala, 2020; Ullah et al., 2019). However, it remains unclear how PAs are incorporated into plant cell walls and what their function is under various developmental and stress conditions. Development of suitable analytical methods is key to solving this issue.
Several wet lab-based methods are well established for PA analysis. These include, but are not limited to, acid butanol assays, chromatographic methods, LC-MS, LC-MS/MS, MALDI-TOF-MS and NMR (Hümmer and Schreier, 2008; Porter et al., 1985). While many of these methods can achieve high sensitivity and reliability when analyzing PAs, they are unsuitable for determining in situ PA levels at the (sub-)cellular level due to the requirement for tissue maceration during sample processing. Understanding the function and dynamics of PAs in cell walls in situ requires the use of high-resolution microscopy coupled with PA-specific fluorescent dyes. Chromophore dyes vanillin and 4-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde (DMACA) have specificity for PAs and have been used in light microscopy. PAs produce pink precipitates in reaction with vanillin (Gardner, 1975; Ferreira et al., 2017) and dark blue precipitates in reaction with DMACA (Abeynayake et al., 2011; Ferreira et al., 2017). DMACA-based assays have been shown to have up to 5-fold higher sensitivity to PAs compared to the vanillin assay (Hümmer and Schreier, 2008). The sensitivity of DMACA to flavan-3-ols is so high that all other potentially interfering substances in plant cells (e.g., caffeine, anthocyanins, chlorogenic acid, citric acid, gallic acid, and rutin) would require approximately 100 to 1000 fold their concentration to produce similar absorbance (Treutter, 1989; Wallace and Giusti, 2010). Although both dyes allow convenient visualization of PAs in vacuoles in light microscopy, the images are neither quantitative nor sufficiently resolved to visualize cell-wall-bound PAs. Interestingly, both vanillin and DMACA have fluorogenic properties that have been extensively exploited in material sciences unrelated to plant biology (Kaito et al., 1979; Katayama et al., 1987; Dryjanski et al., 1999; Singh and Mitra, 2008; Fritz et al., 2015; Poojary et al., 2019). DMACA fluorescence relies on an intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) mechanism, which results in substrate-specific excitation and emission spectra (Singh and Mitra, 2008). Owing to its fluorogenic properties and high sensitivity to PAs, we explored the PA-specific fluorogenic properties of DMACA in situ for possible use in high resolution microscopy in plant sciences. We tested its compatibility with other fluorescent dyes for the co-localization of PAs with other cell wall polymers. Using spectral scanning, we confirmed the spectral properties of PA-specific DMACA fluorescence under both in vitro and in situ conditions.
Materials and methods
Biological materials
All root samples used in this study were collected from in vitro grown hybrid aspen plants (Populus tremula x Populus tremuloides, T89) prepared and grown as described in Chowdhury et al. (2022). Ectomycorrhizal roots were developed by in vitro interactions of T89 and Laccaria bicolor (isolate S238N) fungus using a sandwich culture system (Felten et al., 2009; Chowdhury et al., 2022). Leaf samples were collected from twigs at the lower end of field-grown Swedish Aspen Collection (SwAsp) lines in June. Leaves in the second and third positions from the top of the twigs were used for the study. The line ID number corresponds to the SwAsp ID as described in Bandau et al. (2015). The six SwAsp lines selected for this study had previously been reported by Bandau et al. (2015) to possess either low (SwAsp ID 23, 60, and 115) or high (SwAsp ID 5, 65, and 117) levels of foliar PAs.
Reagents
DMACA and all PA compounds (Supplementary Figure 1) used in this study were bought from Sigma-Aldrich, Sweden AB, Stockholm: 4-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde (Cat. # D4506), Procyanidin A2 (Cat. # 28660), procyanidin B2 (Cat. # 42157), (-)-epigallocatechin (Cat. # 08108) and (+)-catechin (Cat. # 43412). All PA compounds were solubilized in DMSO.
PA extraction, isolation and characterization
PAs were isolated from roots of one-year-old hybrid aspen plants (Populus tremula x Populus tremuloides, T89) grown in a greenhouse. Isolation and purification steps were performed according to methods described in Shay et al. (2017) and Hagerman (2002) with some modifications. Roots were lyophilized, ground to fine powder with a mortar and a pestle and 6 g of root powder were used for PA extraction. Crude PA extraction was performed with 70% aqueous acetone (containing 0.01% ascorbic acid). Samples were vortexed, sonicated in a water bath (30 min, 15°C) and centrifuged (5500 ×g, 15 min, 4°C). Crude PA extract was mixed with an equal volume of hexane in a separation funnel to remove lipophilic compounds (waxes and fatty acids etc.). The aqueous phase was collected and dried under a stream of air, resuspended in 95% ethanol and applied onto a Sephadex LH-20 column for the separation of PAs from other phenolics and carbohydrates. The column was prepared as instructed by the manufacturer (Sigma-Aldrich, Sweden AB, Stockholm) by mixing Sephadex LH-20 with ethanol (EtOH) and settled for three hours. Settled media was mixed with EtOH (75:25) and the slurry was poured into the glass column with a sintered glass filter at the bottom. After equilibration of the sephadex column with EtOH, the PA extract was poured into the column. The column was then washed with EtOH and the eluted fractions were collected and monitored with Prussian blue assay and reducing carbohydrate assay to confirm the removal of phenolics and carbohydrates. When no phenolics and carbohydrates were any longer detected in the eluate, the Sephadex-bound-PAs were eluted with 70% acetone. The fractions were collected and monitored by acid-butanol assay (Porter et al., 1985) using Procyanidin B2 as a standard to confirm the presence of PAs. The fractions enriched with PAs were combined and dried under vacuum and weighed (the final PA powder weight was 54 mg). For compositional analysis of the isolated PA sample the PA fraction isolated from hybrid aspen roots was dissolved in 50% MeOH containing internal standards (Supplementary Table S1) and the composition of monomers and oligomers in the PA sample (injected 2 µL) were analysed with UPLC-MS-ESI-QTOF in positive and negative ionization modes. The compounds were separated in a Waters Acquity HSS T3 C18 column (2.1 × 50 mm, 1.8 µm) equipped with a VanGuard pre-column (2.1 5 mm, 1.8 µm, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) at an oven temperature of 40°C. An Agilent 1290 Infinity UPLC system was equipped with an Agilent 6546 Q-TOF mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies). The elution solvents were water with 0.1% of formic acid (A) and acetonitrile with 0.1% of formic acid (B), a flow rate was 0.5 ml/min and the gradient was following: from 10% B to 99% B in 7 min and at 99% B for 2 min. The mass range was m/z 70-1700. Data processing was performed with Agilent MassHunter Profinder software (version 10.0, Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA).
In vitro characterization of DMACA spectra in the presence of PAs
Pas photospectrometry
The DMACA reagent was prepared by solubilizing 0.05% (w/v) DMACA in absolute ethanol containing 0.8% (w/v) hydrochloric acid. Individual PA compounds were added to the DMACA reagent at a final concentration of 0.5 mg/mL, and the solution was incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature. The absorbance spectra of the solution were recorded in a 96-well microplate reader spectrophotometer (Epoch Biotek) with 100 µl per well (optical pathlength is approximately 0.31 cm) using the pathlength correction function to determine the exact volume in each well. The measured absorbance values were then normalized to 1 cm pathlength. Immediately after, the fluorescence excitation and emission spectra of the samples were measured using a fluorimeter (BioTek™ Synergy™ H4 hybrid microplate reader). Excitation scans were performed from 550 to 750 nm at 10 nm increments with the emission wavelength set to 770 nm. Emission scans were performed from 580 to 800 at 10 nm increments with the excitation wavelength set to 550 nm. The experiment was repeated twice with four technical replicates, which yielded very similar results.
Fluorescent spot test
PAs and cell wall polysaccharides were mixed with the DMACA reagent described above. For the tested PAs the highest concentration (1 mg/ml) corresponds to 3.4 mM for (+)-Catechin, 1.7 mM for Procyanidin B2, 3.3 mM for (i)-Epigallocathechin and 1.7 mM for Procyanidin A2. After 30 minutes of incubation at room temperature, 2 µL of the mixed reagents were loaded onto a PVDF membrane (Cat# IPVH00010, Merkmillipore) and images were recorded immediately with a fluorescent western blot imaging system (Azure 600c, Azure Biosystems) using three RGB fluorescence channels: Cy2 (λex/λem= 492 nm/510 nm), Cy3 (λex/λem= 550 nm/570 nm) and Cy5(λex/λem= 650 nm/670 nm). The experiment was repeated twice, providing similar results.
In situ DMACA fluorescence characterization
DMACA staining
For root samples, freshly harvested poplar root tips were dehydrated in an ethanol series of increasing concentration (30%, 50%, 70% and 100%, 10 minutes in each dilution). Samples were incubated for 15 minutes in DMACA reagent (0.02% w/v DMACA in absolute ethanol containing 0.8% w/v hydrochloric acid) as described in previous studies (Li et al., 1996; Abeynayake et al., 2011). The appearance of a blue/purple precipitate indicated that PAs were present in the material. Following DMACA staining, samples were rehydrated in an ethanol series of decreasing concentration (100%, 70%, 50%, 30% and 0%, 10 minutes in each dilution) and kept in PBS solution before being embedded in 4% agarose in PBS. Agarose embedded samples protected from light could be kept in the fridge for a few days before sectioning. Roots and leaves were cross sectioned at 70 µm thickness using a vibratome (Leica VT1000S). Sections were then transferred onto microscopy glass slides, mounted in 50% glycerol and protected from light before microscopic observation. The experiment was conducted using three to four roots collected from three to four plants. Leaves were stained with DMACA reagent following the same procedure as for root staining; additionally, they were left to dehydrate in the ethanol series for 20 minutes in each dilution to remove chlorophyll.
Spectral analysis
Simultaneous excitation and emission (lambda-lambda scan) was performed on DMACA-stained poplar root cross-sections using a Leica Stellaris confocal laser-scanning microscope (Leica Microsystems, Mannheim, Germany). A tunable white light laser, calibrated to have a steady output power over the available spectrum, was used as the excitation source. Excitation scans were recorded every 10 nm between 489 nm and 659 nm.
Photobleaching assay
DMACA and Calcofluor White photobleaching properties were determined by continuously exposing dye-stained root cross-sections to 633 nm laser light and 405 nm laser light, respectively, and micrographs were taken at the times indicated in the Results section. Fluorescence intensity was measured from at least ten individual areas at each timepoint. The signal intensity was normalized to the signal at time zero (considered 1), and the photobleaching curve was constructed by averaging the relative intensity at the respective times.
Counter staining and high-resolution microscopy
Three to four lateral roots collected from three to four in vitro grown Populus tremula x Populus tremuloides plants were stained with 0.02% DMACA and sectioned at 70 µm deep, as described earlier. For counterstaining with Calcofluor White, DMACA-stained root sections were incubated with 100 µL Calcofluor White M2R (Cat. # 910090, Sigma-Aldrich) stock solution for 5 min at room temperature, briefly washed with water and mounted on a glass slide. For counterstaining with Auramine O, DMACA-stained root sections were incubated with 0.1% Auramine O (Cat. # A9655, Sigma) solubilized in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.3, for 15-20 minutes at room temperature, protecting from light. The sections were then briefly washed with 50 mM Tris-HCl and mounted on glass slides. Images were acquired with a Zeiss LSM 880 microscope operated in Airyscan mode (Huff, 2015) using 633 nm (DMACA fluorescence), 488 nm (Auramine O fluorescence) and 405 nm (Calcofluor white fluorescence) laser lines, MBS 458/514/561/633 nm beam splitters and a C-Apochromat 40x/1.2 W Korr FCS M27 objective.
Results
DMACA has PA-specific fluorescence excitation and emission
We investigated the PA-specific fluorogenic properties of DMACA in an ethanol-based acidic reagent in the presence of four commercial PAs commonly present in plant cells, namely procyanidin B2, procyanidin A2, catechin and epigallocatechin, along with isolated PAs from poplar roots. The PA fraction from hybrid aspen roots consisted of catechin and gallocatechin monomers and a complex mixture of their oligomers. Procyanidins (comprising of catechin subunits) were more abundant than prodelphinidins (gallocatechin subunits). The largest PA polymers detected with UPLC-MS were pentamers and the major constituents were procyanidin trimers based on the peak area (Supplementary Tables 1, 2; Supplementary Figure 2). DMACA exhibited a characteristic spectrophotometric absorbance peak within the range 590 to 690 nm only in the presence of the tested compounds, with peaks (λmax) at 640 nm to 650 nm. PAs alone in EtOH-HCl do not show any absorbance in this region (Supplementary Figures 3A, B and Scharbert et al., 2004; Hümmer and Schreier, 2008; Nakamura et al., 2013). The absorbance of DMACA was strongest with procyanidin B2 and weakest with procyanidin A2 and poplar PAs (Figures 1A, B; Supplementary Figure 3C). The characteristic absorbance peak at 640 nm was in accordance with literature values (Wallace and Giusti, 2010), and showed slight shifts by a few nanometers for catechin, procyanidin A2 and poplar PAs towards higher wavelengths as compared to procyanidin B2 and epigallocatechin (vertical dashed lines in Figure 1B). Such variations had little impact on further analyses of the samples, as confirmed by regression analysis of all PA standards at varying concentration against their absorbance at 640 nm (R2 value > 0.99, Figure 1C). Immediately after measuring the absorbance, fluorescence excitation and emission spectra of the same samples were recorded using a fluorimeter. Our data revealed that DMACA in the presence of all tested PAs yielded characteristic excitation maxima (λex_max) in the range 620 nm to 660 nm and emission maxima (λem_max) in the range 680 nm to 700 nm, depending on the compound (Figure 1D). The Stokes shift (Δλ) varied between 40 to 60 nm depending on the compound (Supplementary Table 2). With the employed equipment, the PA-specific DMACA spectra did not show any characteristic features that could be used to distinguish the respective PAs. Therefore, we measured the fluorescence intensity of PA standards of various concentrations at a constant excitation and emission wavelength (λex = 650 nm, λem = 690 nm) and subjected the data to regression analysis. An R2 value > 0.95 was obtained for all samples (Figure 1E), indicating that DMACA fluorescence was linearly proportional to the concentration of the respective PA. Since DMACA is also used as a chromophore to detect the presence of indole in samples (Miller and Wright, 1982) and indole derivatives, such as auxin (3-indoleacetic acid (IAA)), are present in plants, we measured the absorbance and fluorescence of three indole derivatives (indole, IAA and 1-naphtaleneacetic acid, NAA) (Supplementary Figure 4). Although indole compounds are typically present in plants at micromolar concentrations, we used a much higher concentration (1 mM) for our study. Only pure indole (not IAA or NAA) exhibited any absorbance at 640 nm and only with low intensity. Moreover, DMACA showed no indole-specific excitation and emission spectra (excitation and emission values were zero). Therefore, we concluded that there was no risk that plant indole compounds interfered with the much stronger and PA-specific DMACA fluorescence.
Figure 1 DMACA fluorogenic properties. (A) DMACA yields blue precipitates in the presence of PAs (in this example with procyanidin B2, tube in the centre), which emits fluorescence in a fluorometer (purple, tube furthest to the right). (B) In a spectrophotometer, DMACA alone has absorbance peaks at 250 ± 20 nm and 390 ± 30 nm. In the presence of PA species, (procyanidin A2, B2, catechin, epigallocatechin, and poplar PA-extract), the DMACA absorbance spectrum exhibits a characteristic additional peak at 650 ± 40 nm. The position of peak maxima are indicated by vertical dashed lines. In the inset in (B) as well as in (C) the primary Y axis to the left of each graph applies to Procyanidin A2, Catechin, Epigallocatechin, and the poplar PA-extract and the secondary Y axis on the right applies to Procyanidin B2 for better visualization without overlapping curves. (C) PA quantification using a standard curve at 640nm with data from (B). (D) In the fluorimeter, DMACA-bound excitation spectra (blue area) and emission spectra (red area) differ among PA species. (E) DMACA fluorescence data (λex = 650 nm, λem = 690 nm, cutoff filter 665 nm) can be used for quantification of PA species.
Cell wall compounds do not interfere with PA-specific DMACA fluorescence but chlorophyll does
A key advantage of PA-specific fluorescence is it enables cell-wall-bound PAs to be detected in plant cells by high resolution microscopy techniques. Therefore, we examined whether DMACA exhibited any fluorescence in the presence of cell wall polymers that could potentially interfere with the PA-specific fluorescence. To overcome the limited solubility of polysaccharides in DMACA reagents, we adapted the fluorescence spot test (FST) method Thielemans et al., 2018 instead of using a liquid assay. For detection of FST results we used a western blot imaging system with three excitation and emission channels: Cy2 (λex/λem= 492 nm/510 nm), Cy3 (λex/λem= 550 nm/570 nm) and Cy5 (λex/λem= 650 nm/670 nm). We examined the fluorescence of DMACA with cellulose, xyloglucan, homogalacturonan in two different methylesterification states and lignin (all diluted in water) Somerville et al., 2004 and included the same commercial PA standards and poplar root PAs (in DMSO) as controls. Unbound DMACA without added substrate (column 6, Figure 2) showed strong concentration-dependent fluorescence in the Cy3 channel, very weak to undetectable fluorescence in Cy5 and mostly non-specific background in the Cy2. Since the solvent alone (ethanol-HCl without DMACA in Cy2) had similar fluorescence as most DMACA concentrations in Cy2, most of the fluorescence in this column in Cy2 may be caused by the solvent, which was different than for all other tested compounds (Figure 2). There was no concentration-dependent fluorescence of the tested polysaccharides or lignin with DMACA in any of the three channels. Fluorescence observed in the Cy2 and Cy3 channels with polysaccharides or lignin was due to unbound DMACA and substrate autofluorescence. However, only in the presence of PAs, did the DMACA fluorescence shift from the Cy3 range to the expected Cy5 range, and the fluorescence intensity was PA concentration dependent. At similar concentration levels, the fluorescence intensity varied between the substrates, with the highest fluorescence observed in the presence of procyanidin B2 and the lowest in the presence of procyanidin A2 and isolated PAs. This was in line with our previous observations from spectral imaging using the fluorimeter assay. Thus, the FST assay provided a rapid, semi-quantitative visual assessment showing that PA-specific DMACA fluorescence did not interfere with cell wall polymers, polysaccharides and lignin in the relevant Cy5 range.
Figure 2 Fluorescent spot test (FST) of DMACA fluorescence (excitation λex, emission = λem) with different PA species and cell wall polysaccharides. Fluorimeter settings for three channels: Cy2: λex= 492 nm, λem= 510 nm; Cy3: λex= 550 nm, λem= 570 nm; Cy5: λex= 650 nm, λem= 670 nm. Dilutions started at 1 mg/mL for PAs and lignin and 10 mg/L for polysaccharides. At each dilution step, the concentration was halved. Arrows indicate the direction of the concentration gradient. The bottom spot (below the dashed line) in each series was recorded for only solvent (acidic alcohol, missing DMACA) with the respective substrate. ProA2, procyanidin A2; ProB2, procyanidin B2; EGC, (−)-epi-gallocatechin; CAT, (+)-catechin; PAs, proanthocyanidins from roots of Populus tremula; Cel, cellulose; XG, xyloglucan; DeHG, demethylesterified homogalacturonan; MeHG, methylesterified homogalacturonan and LG, lignin.
Although in vitro investigations with the fluorimeter and FST method showed that the PA-specific DMACA excitation and emission spectra lay within the red portion of the light spectrum, aberrations in these spectra can occur in DMACA-stained plant tissue at in situ level. Therefore, we performed a simultaneous excitation and emission scan of DMACA-stained poplar root (containing PAs) cross-sections using a tunable white-light laser and confocal microscope (Figure 3). The detected excitation range was 510 to 640 nm, which was broader than the excitation range of DMACA with isolated poplar PAs under in vitro conditions. In contrast, the emission range was between 670 and 692 nm, similar to that recorded for the in vitro conditions tested above. A slight change in the excitation and emission ranges between in vitro and in situ conditions was to be expected due to the more complex environment of PAs inside plant tissues, which can influence the fluorescence of compounds. Our results suggest that DMACA fluorescence should ideally be used with 561 nm or 633 nm laser lines, which are commonly applied in confocal microscopy (Figure 3). Conveniently, the relevant excitation and emission ranges do not interfere with autofluorescence spectra of other plant polyphenolic compounds, which typically lie below these ranges (Talamond et al., 2015, Donaldson, 2020). However, since the emission range of PA-specific DMACA fluorescence overlaps with chlorophyll autofluorescence (Talamond et al., 2015), caution must be exercised when analyzing chlorophyll containing tissue as our experiments with leaves from Populus tremula genotypes from the Swedish Aspen Collection (SwASP) shows. These leaves have different levels of PAs (Bandau et al., 2015). The leaves were stained with DMACA reagent following the procedure described in materials and methods. We compared brightfield images to fluorescence images (Figure 3), since DMACA is known to form a blue/purple precipitate when bound to PAs Li et al., 1996. PA levels differed among the genotypes as indicated by the presence of blue colour from DMACA staining in brightfield images. Upon excitation and imaging with a fluorescent imaging system (Figure 3E) using the red channel (λex/λem= 650 nm/670 nm), fluorescence was observed mainly in high tannin areas in the leaves (corresponding to areas of blue color in Figure 3D). In a few areas, red fluorescence was observed, which does not correspond to blue color in Figure 3D, e.g. in leaf 115, in the vein of leaf 5 and 72 and at the leaf tip (potentially a hydatode) of leaf 5 and 60. This may be due to the presence of uncleared chlorophyll and the presence of other autofluorescent compounds in the vascular systems, since we also see some faint fluorescence in the unstained leaf’s vasculature. Similar results, with background fluorescence probably from uncleared chlorophyll and/or cuticular waxes, were observed in leaf sections (Figures 3F, G). This highlights the importance of using appropriate non-stained controls to distinguish DMACA fluorescence from autofluorescence of other compounds especially in materials that contain chlorophyll, waxes or other compounds with red autofluorescence in the red spectral region.
Figure 3 PA detection by DMACA detection in Populus root and leaf material. The relative fluorescence intensity of DMACA-stained poplar roots depends on the selected excitation and emission wavelengths: (A) Contour plot showing the relative fluorescence intensity (colored scale) for various combinations of excitation and emission wavelength (λ) acquired through a lambda-lambda scan with a tunable white light laser. (B) DMACA-stained poplar root images from two lambda scans upon excitation with two commonly used confocal laser lines 561 nm and 633 nm (within the excitation area shown in the contour plot). Scale bars = 50 µm. (C) Comparison of tissue spectral representations of cell lumen and cell wall areas excited with 561 nm (upper graph) and 633 nm (lower graph) laser lines. The spectra were identified with linear unmixing tools in Zeiss Zen software by manually using the cross tool to mark the cell lumen and cell wall areas. The spectra of vacuolar PAs and cell-wall-bound PAs showed comparable emission ranges in the red region of the spectrum, as shown in Figure 1. (D–G) Detection of PAs with DMACA in Populus tremula genotypes from the Swedish Aspen Collection (SwASP) with different leaf PA levels (Bandau et al., 2015). The ID number corresponds to the SwAsp ID. (D) Light images showing PA levels as blue precipitate. (E) DMACA-stained leaves upon excitation and imaging with a fluorescent imaging system (Azure 600c, Azure Biosystems) using the red channel (λex/λem= 650 nm/670 nm). Leaf section of P. tremula lines with high and low PA content stained with DMACA (F) and imaged under the confocal microscope, overlay with brightfield images. Unstained sections showing background fluorescence (G). Scalebar in (F–G) 50µm.
PA-specific DMACA spectral properties are suitable for fluorescence microscopy
We investigated the suitability of the DMACA fluorophore for use in fluorescence microscopy, specifically for the in situ localization of PAs in root tissue. Regions of blue DMACA-PA precipitate observed with a light microscope overlapped with fluorescent regions observed with an epi-fluorescence microscope (Supplementary Figure 5), indicating that the fluorescence was representative of PAs in root tissue. Especially in the epidermis cells we observed intracellular precipitates overlapping with fluorescence. The absence of such intracellular contents in certain cells may result from the fact that cells are cut open during vibratome-sectioning and cell-contents are lost. Interestingly, cell-wall-bound fluorescence was more prominent in fluorescence images than the blue/purple coloration in brightfield images, suggesting that DMACA fluorescence is a sensitive way of visualizing cell-wall-bound PAs.
To determine the analytical stability of DMACA fluorescence in root tissues, we performed a photobleaching experiment including Calcofluor White for comparison, which is a commonly used cell wall fluorophore. Bleaching of the DMACA fluorescence intensity was much slower than that of Calcofluor White at their corresponding excitation wavelengths (405 nm for Calcofluor White and 633 nm for DMACA) (Figure 4). After 5 minutes of continuous exposure, the DMACA fluorescence intensity of the cell wall and lumen decreased by less than 10% of the original intensity, whereas the Calcofluor White fluorescence intensity decreased by about 20%. After 30 minutes and 60 minutes of continuous scanning, the DMACA fluorescence intensity had decreased by approximately 25% and 35%, respectively, whereas Calcofluor White fluorescence decreased by approximately 60% and 75%, respectively. This indicated that the PA-specific DMACA fluorescence signal was highly stable.
Figure 4 Photobleaching curves for Calcofluor White (excited with a 405 nm laser) and DMACA (excited with a 633 nm laser) stained poplar roots. (A) Line graph showing the average signal intensity of various areas of plant cells normalized to the signal at timepoint zero. The shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals. (B) Micrographs of poplar root cross-sections at 0, 5, 30 and 60 minutes after scanning, showing photobleaching of samples stained with DMACA and Calcofluor White. The laser gain was slightly different for the two lasers but was maintained constant over time. All other scan parameters were the same for the two laser lines. Scale bars = 50 µm.
Next, we assessed the compatibility of PA-specific DMACA fluorescence with other dyes with green and blue fluorescence. In the first example, we used poplar roots colonized by an ectomycorrhizal fungus and stained them with DMACA, which binds to plant cell walls as reported above, and Alexa Fluor 488 conjugated wheat germ agglutinin (WGA), which binds to chitin in fungal walls (Peters and Latka, 1986) (Figure 5A). Negative controls without DMACA did not show any signal in the red area of the spectrum (Figure 5B), showing that the dye is more suitable for use in root as compared to leaf tissues (Figure 3). The results confirmed the compatibility of the two dyes and specific localization to plant (DMACA) and fungal (WGA) cell walls.
Figure 5 (A) In situ co-localization of PAs and chitin in the ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria bicolor in a lateral root cross-section (taken 500 µm from the root tip) of Populus tremula x Populus tremuloides. PAs in the root (DMACA staining; magenta) surrounded by a mantle of the symbiont (wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) staining; green) circa seven days into the colonization phase. (B) Similarly aged root stained with WGA only and without DMACA (negative control). To our observation, other than the fungal cell wall, WGA also binds to the xylem wall (indicated with arrow). Scale bar = 50 µm. The experiment was performed on 3-4 roots originating from separate plants yielding similar results in replicates.
High-resolution imaging of DMACA-stained poplar roots reveals cell-wall-bound localization features of PAs
To investigate co-localization of cell wall polymers with PAs, we counterstained DMACA-stained hybrid aspen lateral roots with Auramine O, a green fluorescent dye that binds to lignin, suberin and cutin (Nishikawa et al., 2005; Pesquet et al., 2005; Ursache et al., 2018). Intense fluorescence signals were observed for both DMACA and Auramine O in the longitudinal wall of the epidermis, first cortex layer, endodermis and xylem vessel in cross-sections taken 500 µm from the root tip in 28-day-old lateral roots (Figure 6). Fluorescence intensity profiles showed significant overlap of the DMACA and Auramine O fluorescence in these areas. However, in section close to the root tip (300 µm) through newly emerged (three day old) lateral roots, we observed an absence of DMACA fluorescence in the Casparian strip, which was well stained with Auramine O (Supplementary Figure 6). Since Casparian strips develop by deposition of suberin at an early developmental stage of the endodermis (Kirkham, 2014; Andersen et al., 2015) our data indicated that PAs are incorporated into the endodermis at a later stage. Lignification is a common feature of the xylem wall (Lourenço et al., 2016), which probably explains the intense Auramine O staining in such cells (Figure 6). Since DMACA does not exhibit lignin-specific fluorescence (Figure 2), the presence of DMACA fluorescence in the xylem wall suggests that PAs were incorporated in the xylem wall as well. Therefore, use of DMACA as a fluorescent stain may facilitate investigations of possible connections of PAs with lignin (Dixon and Sarnala, 2020) and other polymers in cell walls, e.g., suberin.
Figure 6 Double staining with (A) Auramine O (green) and (B) DMACA (magenta) on cross-sections (taken at 500 µm from the root tip) of 28-day-old Populus tremula x Populus tremuloides roots. (C) Overlay showing in situ localization of lignified (xylem) and suberized areas (endodermis and cortex) together with PAs in lateral root cross-sections. Scale bars = 50 µm. (D–G) Fluorescence intensity profiles across cell walls in four cell layers (white lines in (C)) showing overlapping fluorescence of Auramine O (green) and DMACA (magenta) in epidermis, cortex, endodermis and xylem cell walls. The experiment was performed on 3-4 roots originating from separate plants yielding similar results in replicates.
Studies using macerated cell walls have shown that PAs have a high binding affinity to pectic polysaccharides, potentially through non-covalent bonds (Riou et al., 2002; Watrelot et al., 2013; Renard et al., 2017; Zhu, 2018; Liu et al., 2020; Watrelot and Norton, 2020; Liu et al., 2021). Using DMACA and Calcofluor White as a cell wall counterstain (Wood, 1980; Mori and Bellani, 1996) in combination with Airyscan mode microscopy that increases signal-to-noise ratio and resolution (Huff, 2015) on cross-sections of 7- and 28-day-old (after emergence, dae) lateral roots, we investigated whether PAs specifically localize to the middle lamella between adjacent cell walls. This area is rich in pectin (Daher and Braybrook, 2015), and potential localization of PAs in the middle lamella may strengthen the hypothesis that PAs and pectins may interact in muro. The micrographs (Figure 7) revealed that in young roots (7 dae), the DMACA fluorescence intensity was highest near the middle lamella between two adjacent cells and the fluorescence intensity decreased towards the cell lumen. In older roots (28 dae), the DMACA fluorescence was more evenly distributed over the cell wall, overlapping largely with Calcofluor White fluorescence. These observations suggest that in young lateral roots, PAs localize more specifically to areas of high pectin content in the middle lamella (Daher and Braybrook, 2015). However, the localization may be dynamic, and during aging, PA deposition may increase (as concluded from stronger signals in old roots) and spread to the primary wall.
Figure 7 DMACA (magenta)/Calcofluor White (blue) double staining detected by Airyscan microscopy revealing the location of PAs in cell walls and intracellular areas in lateral root cross-sections (taken 500 µm from root tip) of Populus tremula x Populus tremuloides. (A) Young root at 7 days after emergence (dae). (B) Graph representing intensity profiles of DMACA (magenta-colored lines) and Calcofluor White (blue-colored lines) measured along the dashed white arrow in (A). (C) Old lateral root at 28 dae. (D) Graph representing intensity profiles of DMACA and Calcofluor White measured along the dashed white arrow in (C). The solid white arrows in (C) show the presence of PAs intracellularly. Scale bars = 20 µm. The experiment was performed on 3-4 roots originating from separate plants per time point yielding similar results as shown above.
Discussion
We characterized the fluorogenic properties of DMACA toward PAs, which are commonly found in plant tissues. DMACA is a widely used chromophore for PA detection owing to its high sensitivity and reliability (Hümmer and Schreier, 2008) but has hitherto not been characterized as a fluorescent dye for diverse fluorescence-based microscopy techniques. However, cinnamic acid derivatives, including DMACA, exhibit fluorogenic properties that have been exploited in various fields of material sciences (Dryjanski et al., 1999; Singh and Mitra, 2008; Fritz et al., 2015). It has been proposed that, under acidic conditions such as used in our study, DMACA preferentially reacts with the terminal units of proanthocyanidin, favoring the C8 position of the A-ring (Wallace and Giusti, 2010). The literature provides some information about the fluorescence mechanisms of DMACA alone, in the absence of PAs (Bangal et al., 2001). DMACA and its derivatives have also been used to create fluorescence probes by reacting with various compounds, which can form a double twistable ethylene structure with intramolecular charge transfer capabilities and hence, emit fluorescence in the red to infrared spectra upon photoexcitation (Chen et al., 2021; Gao et al., 2022; Sheshashena Reddy and Ram Reddy, 2013). However, further studies are needed to understand the chemistry and physics of the DMACA fluorescence shift with its substrates and this was beyond the scope of our study oriented to the biological use of DMACA in plant tissues. Our data demonstrated that DMACA exhibits PA-specific fluorescence that can be used to reveal important localization attributes of both intracellular and cell-wall-bound PAs through combination with other fluorogenic dyes and microscopy techniques.
We revealed that PA-specific DMACA fluorescence lies in the red light region of the spectrum, which we confirmed by in vitro determination using commercial and isolated PAs commonly present in plants and by in situ determination of hybrid aspen roots known to be rich in PAs (Dixon et al., 2005). A slight difference in the emission and excitation ranges was observed between the in vitro and in situ studies, which was expected since several physicochemical parameters, including pH and electrostatic interactions with other molecules, can affect fluorescence spectra (Paës, 2014), in addition to instrumental differences. In addition, differences in the polymer length of PAs may affect DMACA absorbance (Wang et al., 2016) and fluorescence. Since the DMACA fluorescence spectrum appears to be both solvent- and substrate-dependent because of its intramolecular charge transfer properties (Bangal et al., 2001; Singh and Mitra, 2008), we recommend that, if different solvents are used, the DMACA fluorescence spectrum should be verified prior to conducting biological experiments. Since one of our goals was to localize cell-wall-bound PAs in situ, we investigated whether DMACA exhibits cell wall polymer-specific fluorescence that interferes with PA-specific fluorescence. A fluorophore’s fluorescence emission may be enhanced or shifted after selectively binding with cell wall polysaccharides. For example, Trypan Blue, Solophenyl Flavine 7GFE and Pontamine Fast Scarlet 4B change emission properties after binding selectively to glycan, cellulose and xyloglucan, respectively (Anderson et al., 2010; Liesche et al., 2015). Using a fluorescence spot test (FST), we confirmed that DMACA yielded a red emission spectrum only in the presence of PAs and not in the presence of cell wall polysaccharides or lignin (Figure 2). Therefore, the PA-specific DMACA fluorescence should be similar for both wall-bound PAs and vacuolar PAs in plant tissue. This finding was consistent with our subsequent in situ study, where we found that the fluorescence spectral pattern was similar in intracellular content and cell wall area (Figure 3). To draw exact conclusion on the nature of intracellular structures, the fixation and staining protocol would need to be modified to preserve organelles. By measuring several spectral properties, we showed that PA-specific DMACA fluorescence is suitable for confocal microscopy. PA-specific DMACA fluorescence spectra have a Stokes shift of about 40 nm to 60 nm, which is large enough to separate excitation light from emission light to obtain a high signal-to-noise ratio (Gao et al., 2017; Ren et al., 2018). PA-specific DMACA fluorescence was also found to be stable even under long-term observation. To the best of our knowledge, the DMACA fluorescence signal stability has not been assessed before in any study. Therefore, we could not compare the DMACA signal stability in the presence of other compounds. DMACA as a fluorophore is also convenient as two commonly available confocal laser lines, 561 nm and 633 nm, are suitable for excitation of DMACA-stained plant tissues, such as hybrid aspen roots. However, excitation with a 561 nm laser yielded broader emission in the red spectrum compared to excitation with a 633 nm laser (Figure 3).
We demonstrated several potential uses of PA-specific DMACA fluorescence in combination with other fluorescent dyes. Using Alexa Fluor 488 conjugated wheat germ agglutinin (WGA), which binds fungal chitin, we demonstrated localization of PAs in plant roots colonized by fungal mycelia during hybrid aspen-ectomycorrhizal fungal interactions (Figure 5). We are currently investigating the dynamics of host root PAs during ectomycorrhizal symbiosis (Ferdous, Chowdhury et al. unpublished) using DMACA in combination with confocal microscopy. Such a dual staining technique could be used to investigate other plant-microbe interactions to understand PA functions, since PAs are known to have antimicrobial properties (Scalbert, 1991). Furthermore, we used confocal microscopy in Airyscan mode to examine double-stained tissue to improve the spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio without increasing the laser excitation power and image acquisition time (Korobchevskaya et al., 2017). This supported our findings from in vitro studies that PAs can bind cell wall compounds and such binding patterns may change over time during tissue development and maturation (Figure 7). Similarly, we showed that wall-bound PAs colocalize with wall-bound phenolics, such as lignin and suberin, as revealed by Auramine O staining in root tissue (Figure 6). Our current protocol for PA-specific DMACA fluorescence imaging is best applicable for tissues devoid of chlorophyll, which has an overlapping emission range with the PA-specific DMACA fluorescence (Donaldson, 2020) and could confound the interpretation of the red fluorescence. Therefore, when staining above-ground tissues, special care needs to be taken. One solution is to extend the ethanol washes that are part of the staining protocol to clear tissues from chlorophyll. Another solution can be the analysis of fluorescence lifetime of the fluorescence, which will differ between PA-specific DMACA and chlorophyll-dependent autofluorescence. This requires however a microscope equipped with tools for fluorescence lifetime analysis. In any case, it is strongly advised to always compare the PA-specific DMACA signal to non-stained control samples treated with the reagents without DMACA.
Our study shows for the first time that DMACA fluorescence can be used to visualize PAs in plant cell walls and its colocalization with cell wall polymers, providing a novel tool to study PA interaction with various cell wall polymers and PA dynamics on a sub-cellular level. While the current investigation is limited to a co-localization study, it opens the possibility of further study into how these cell-wall-bound PAs interact with other polymers, including pectin, lignin and suberin. The methods can be modified to serve specific purposes. For example, fluorescence-lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) techniques could be used to determine whether there is a distinguishable DMACA spectra for different PA standards. PA-specific DMACA fluorescence may be compatible with other important fluorescent plant cell dyes that emit light in the blue and green spectrum. Furthermore, attempts could be made to incorporate DMACA staining in immunolocalization techniques based on the high sensitivity of antibodies toward their substrates, but will require adaptation of sample fixation so to include formaldehydes for epitope conservation. Such combinations may not only improve the spatial visualization of specific PA and wall polymer connections but also provide a vital tool for deconstructing complex cell wall polymers in the future. Taken together, our results demonstrate that fluorescence microscopy techniques provide new and exciting avenues for studying PAs in planta, including PA polymerization and degradation. This may facilitate cell biological studies and analyses of genotypic differences in PA biosynthesis and storage, as well as research into the effects of ontogeny and environmental impacts of interest in chemical ecology and plant physiology, using Salicaceae trees as model systems (Bailey et al., 2005; Barbehenn and Peter Constabel, 2011; Bandau et al., 2015; Dettlaff et al., 2018; Ullah et al., 2019; Bandau et al., 2021; Cole et al., 2021).
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Author contributions
JC, BA and JL-F designed the study. JC conducted the experiments and analyzed the data. JL-F performed spectral analysis and supervised the study. JF and JL isolated proanthocyanidins from poplar roots. JC and JL-F wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors.
Funding
JC and JF were supported by the Kempe Foundation (grants SMK-1533 and JKC-2012, respectively), and JC and JL were additionally supported by Formas – a Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development (grant 942 2105-539 for JC). The experiments in this study were funded by two grants from “Gunnar och Ruth Björkmans fond för norrländska botanisk forskning” (Dnr FS 2.1.6-742-18 and FS 2.1.6-800-19) to JC in collaboration with BA.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge use of the facilities and technical assistance of the Umeå Plant Science Centre (UPSC) Microscopy Facility, the Laboratories for Chemical Biology, Swedish Metabolomics Centre, Umeå University, and Biopolymer Analytical Platform at UPSC.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.1060804/full#supplementary-material
References
Abeynayake, S. W., Panter, S., Mouradov, A., Spangenberg, G. (2011). A high-resolution method for the localization of proanthocyanidins in plant tissues. Plant Methods 7, 13. doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-7-13
Andersen, T. G., Barberon, M., Geldner, N. (2015). Suberization - the second life of an endodermal cell. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 28, 9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.08.004
Anderson, C. T., Carroll, A., Akhmetova, L., Somerville, C. (2010). Real-time imaging of cellulose reorientation during cell wall expansion in arabidopsis roots. Plant Physiol. 152, 787–796. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.150128
Bailey, J. K., Deckert, R., Schweitzer, J. A., Rehill, B. J., Lindroth, R. L., Gehring, C., et al. (2005). Host plant genetics affect hidden ecological players: links among populus, condensed tannins, and fungal endophyte infection. Can. J. Bot. 83, 356–361. doi: 10.1139/b05-008
Bandau, F., Albrectsen, B. R., Robinson, K. M., Gundale, M. J. (2021). European Aspen with high compared to low constitutive tannin defenses grow taller in response to anthropogenic nitrogen enrichment. For. Ecol. Manage. 487, 118985. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.118985
Bandau, F., Decker, V. H. G., Gundale, M. J., Albrectsen, B. R. (2015). Genotypic tannin levels in populus tremula impact the way nitrogen enrichment affects growth and allocation responses for some traits and not for others. PloS One 10, e0140971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140971
Bangal, P. R., Panja, S., Chakravorti, S. (2001). Excited state photodynamics of 4-N,N-dimethylamino cinnamaldehyde. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 139, 5–16. doi: 10.1016/S1010-6030(00)00423-8
Barbehenn, R. V., Peter Constabel, C. (2011). Tannins in plant-herbivore interactions. Phytochemistry 72, 1551–1565. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.01.040
Chen, B., Mao, S., Sun, Y., Sun, L., Ding, N., Li, C., et al. (2021). A mitochondria-targeted near-infrared fluorescent probe for imaging viscosity in living cells and a diabetic mice model. Chem. Commun. 57, 4376–4379. doi: 10.1039/d1cc01104a
Chowdhury, J., Kemppainen, M., Delhomme, N., Shutava, I., Zhou, J., Takahashi, J., et al. (2022). Laccaria bicolor pectin methylesterases are involved in ectomycorrhiza development with populus tremula × populus tremuloides. New Phytol 236, 639–655. doi: 10.1111/nph.18358
Cole, C. T., Morrow, C. J., Barker, H. L., Rubert-Nason, K. F., Riehl, J. F. L., Köllner, T. G., et al. (2021). Growing up aspen: ontogeny and trade-offs shape growth, defence and reproduction in a foundation species. Ann. Bot. 127, 505–517. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaa070
Constabel, P. C., Yoshida, K., Walker, V. (2014). “Diverse ecological roles of plant tannins: plant defense and beyond,” in Recent advances in polyphenol research. Eds. Romani, A., Lattanzio, V., Quideau, S. (Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd), 115–142. doi: 10.1002/9781118329634.ch5
Daher, F. B., Braybrook, S. A. (2015). How to let go: pectin and plant cell adhesion. Front. Plant Sci. 6. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00523
Dettlaff, M. A., Marshall, V., Erbilgin, N., Cahill, J. F. (2018). Root condensed tannins vary over time, but are unrelated to leaf tannins. AoB Plants 10, ply044. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/ply044
Dixon, R. A., Sarnala, S. (2020). Proanthocyanidin biosynthesis - a matter of protection. Plant Physiol. 184, 579–591. doi: 10.1104/pp.20.00973
Dixon, R. A., Xie, D.-Y., Sharma, S. B. (2005). Proanthocyanidins - a final frontier in flavonoid research? New Phytol. 165, 9–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01217.x
Donaldson, L. (2020). Autofluorescence in plants. Molecules 25 (10), 2393. doi: 10.3390/molecules25102393
Dryjanski, M., Lehmann, T., Abriola, D., Pietruszko, R. (1999). Binding and incorporation of 4-trans-(N,N-dimethylamino) cinnamaldehyde by aldehyde dehydrogenase. J. Protein Chem. 18, 627–636. doi: 10.1023/A:1020646005061
Felten, J., Kohler, A., Morin, E., Bhalerao, R. P., Palme, K., Martin, F., et al. (2009). The ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria bicolor stimulates lateral root formation in poplar and arabidopsis through auxin transport and signaling. Plant Physiol. 151, 1991–2005. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.147231
Ferreira, B. G., Falcioni, R., Guedes, L. M., Avritzer, S. C., Antunes, W. C., Souza, L. A., et al. (2017). Preventing false negatives for histochemical detection of phenolics and lignins in PEG-embedded plant tissues. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 65, 105–116. doi: 10.1369/0022155416677035
Ferreira, D., Li, X. C. (2000). Oligomeric proanthocyanidins: naturally occurring O-heterocycles. Nat. Prod. Rep. 17, 193–212. doi: 10.1039/a705728h
Ferreira, D., Slade, D. (2002). Oligomeric proanthocyanidins: naturally occurring O-heterocycles. Nat. Prod. Rep. 19, 517–541. doi: 10.1039/b008741f
Fritz, P., van Bronswijk, W., Lewis, S. W. (2015). A new p-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde reagent formulation for the photoluminescence detection of latent fingermarks on paper. Forensic Sci. Int. 257, 20–28. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.07.037
Gao, Y., Li, M., Tian, X., Xu, K., Gong, S., Zhang, Y., et al. (2022). Colorimetric and turn-on fluorescent chemosensor with large stokes shift for sensitively probing cyanide anion in real samples and living systems. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 271, 120882. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2022.120882
Gao, Z., Hao, Y., Zheng, M., Chen, Y. (2017). A fluorescent dye with large stokes shift and high stability: synthesis and application to live cell imaging. RSC Adv. 7, 7604–7609. doi: 10.1039/C6RA27547H
Gardner, R. O. (1975). Vanillin-hydrochloric acid as a histochemical test for tannin. Stain Technol. 50, 315–317. doi: 10.3109/10520297509117081
Hagerman, A. (2002) Tannin handbook. Available at: http://www.users.muohio.edu/hagermae/.
Huff, J. (2015). The airyscan detector from ZEISS: confocal imaging with improved signal-to-noise ratio and super-resolution. Nat. Methods 12, i–ii. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.388
Hümmer, W., Schreier, P. (2008). Analysis of proanthocyanidins. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 52, 1381–1398. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200700463
James, A. M., Ma, D., Mellway, R., Gesell, A., Yoshida, K., Walker, V., et al. (2017). Poplar MYB115 and MYB134 transcription factors regulate proanthocyanidin synthesis and structure. Plant Physiol. 174, 154–171. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01962
Kaito, T., Sagara, K., Ikunaga, K. (1979). Fluorometric determination of vanillin. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 27, 3167–3170. doi: 10.1248/cpb.27.3167
Katayama, M., Mukai, Y., Taniguchi, H. (1987). Fluorometric determination of vanillin with 4,5-dimethyl-o-phenylenediamine. Anal. Sci. 3, 369–372. doi: 10.2116/analsci.3.369
Kirkham, M. B. (2014). “Chapter 15 - Root Anatomy and Poiseuille's Law for Water Flow in Roots. Editor(s): M.B. Kirkham. Principles of Soil and Plant Water Relations (Second Edition). (Elsevier), 243–266. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-420022-7.00015-X
Korobchevskaya, K., Lagerholm, B., Colin-York, H., Fritzsche, M. (2017). Exploring the potential of airyscan microscopy for live cell imaging. Photonics 4, 41. doi: 10.3390/photonics4030041
Liesche, J., Marek, M., Günther-Pomorski, T. (2015). Cell wall staining with trypan blue enables quantitative analysis of morphological changes in yeast cells. Front. Microbiol. 6. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00107
Li, Y., Tanner, G., Larkin, P. (1996). The DMACA–HCl protocol and the threshold proanthocyanidin content for bloat safety in forage legumes. J. Sci. Food Agric. 70, 89–101. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199601)70:1<89::AID-JSFA470>3.0.CO;2-N
Liu, X., Le Bourvellec, C., Renard, C. M. G. C. (2020). Interactions between cell wall polysaccharides and polyphenols: effect of molecular internal structure. Comp. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 19, 3574–3617. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12632
Liu, X., Renard, C. M. G. C., Rolland-Sabaté, A., Le Bourvellec, C. (2021). Exploring interactions between pectins and procyanidins: structure-function relationships. Food Hydrocoll. 113, 106498. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106498
Lourenço, A., Rencoret, J., Chemetova, C., Gominho, J., Gutiérrez, A., Del Río, J. C., et al. (2016). Lignin composition and structure differs between xylem, phloem and phellem in quercus suber l. Front. Plant Sci. 7. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01612
Miller, J. M., Wright, J. W. (1982). Spot indole test: evaluation of four reagents. J. Clin. Microbiol. 15, 589–592. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.4.589-592.1982
Mori, B., Bellani, L. M. (1996). Differential staining for cellulosic and modified plant cell walls. Biotech. Histochem. 71, 71–72. doi: 10.3109/10520299609117136
Nakamura, K., Shirato, M., Ikai, H., Kanno, T., Sasaki, K., Kohno, M., et al. (2013). Photo-irradiation of proanthocyanidin as a new disinfection technique via reactive oxygen species formation. PloS One 8, e60053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060053
Nishikawa, S., Zinkl, G. M., Swanson, R. J., Maruyama, D., Preuss, D. (2005). Callose (beta-1,3 glucan) is essential for arabidopsis pollen wall patterning, but not tube growth. BMC Plant Biol. 5, 22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-5-22
Paës, G. (2014). Fluorescent probes for exploring plant cell wall deconstruction: a review. Molecules 19, 9380–9402. doi: 10.3390/molecules19079380
Pesquet, E., Ranocha, P., Legay, S., Digonnet, C., Barbier, O., Pichon, M., et al. (2005). Novel markers of xylogenesis in zinnia are differentially regulated by auxin and cytokinin. Plant Physiol. 139, 1821–1839. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.064337
Peters, W., Latka, I. (1986). Electron microscopic localization of chitin using colloidal gold labelled with wheat germ agglutinin. Histochemistry 84, 155–160. doi: 10.1007/BF00499827
Poojary, S., Acharya, M., Abdul Salam, A. A., Kekuda, D., Nayek, U., Madan Kumar, S., et al. (2019). Highly fluorescent materials derived from ortho-vanillin: structural, photophysical electrochemical and theoretical studies. J. Mol. Liq. 275, 792–806. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.11.067
Porter, L. J., Hrstich, L. N., Chan, B. G. (1985). The conversion of procyanidins and prodelphinidins to cyanidin and delphinidin. Phytochemistry 25, 223–230. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)94533-3
Rauf, A., Imran, M., Abu-Izneid, T., Iahtisham-Ul-Haq, Patel, S., Pan, X., et al. (2019). Proanthocyanidins: a comprehensive review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 116, 108999. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108999
Renard, C. M. G. C., Watrelot, A. A., Le Bourvellec, C. (2017). Interactions between polyphenols and polysaccharides: mechanisms and consequences in food processing and digestion. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 60, 43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2016.10.022
Ren, T.-B., Xu, W., Zhang, W., Zhang, X.-X., Wang, Z.-Y., Xiang, Z., et al. (2018). A general method to increase stokes shift by introducing alternating vibronic structures. J. Am. Chem. Soc 140, 7716–7722. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b04404
Riou, V., Vernhet, A., Doco, T., Moutounet, M. (2002). Aggregation of grape seed tannins in model wine–effect of wine polysaccharides. Food Hydrocoll. 16, 17–23. doi: 10.1016/S0268-005X(01)00034-0
Rue, E. A., Rush, M. D., van Breemen, R. B. (2017). Procyanidins: a comprehensive review encompassing structure elucidation via mass spectrometry. Phytochem. Rev. 17, 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s11101-017-9507-3
Scalbert, A. (1991). Antimicrobial properties of tannins. Phytochemistry 30, 3875–3883. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(91)83426-L
Scharbert, S., Holzmann, N., Hofmann, T. (2004). Identification of the astringent taste compounds in black tea infusions by combining instrumental analysis and human bioresponse. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52, 3498–3508. doi: 10.1021/jf049802u
Shay, P.-E., Trofymow, J. A., Constabel, C. P. (2017). An improved butanol-HCl assay for quantification of water-soluble, acetone:methanol-soluble, and insoluble proanthocyanidins (condensed tannins). Plant Methods 13, 63. doi: 10.1186/s13007-017-0213-3
Sheshashena Reddy, T., Ram Reddy, A. (2013). Synthesis and fluorescence study of 6,7-diaminocoumarin and its imidazolo derivatives. Dyes Pigments 96, 525–534. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2012.08.021
Singh, T. S., Mitra, S. (2008). Fluorimetric studies on the binding of 4-(dimethylamino)cinnamic acid with micelles and bovine serum albumin. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 7, 1063–1070. doi: 10.1039/b717475f
Somerville, C., Bauer, S., Brininstool, G., Facette, M., Hamann, T., Milne, J., et al. (2004). Toward a systems approach to understanding plant cell walls. Science 306, 2206–2211. doi: 10.1126/science.1102765
Talamond, P., Verdeil, J.-L., Conéjéro, G. (2015). Secondary metabolite localization by autofluorescence in living plant cells. Molecules 20, 5024–5037. doi: 10.3390/molecules20035024
Thielemans, L., Gornsawun, G., Hanboonkunupakarn, B., Paw, M. K., Porn, P., Moo, P. K., et al. (2018). Diagnostic performances of the fluorescent spot test for G6PD deficiency in newborns along the Thailand-Myanmar border: a cohort study. [version 1; peer review: 3 approved]. Wellcome Open Res. 3, 1. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.13373.1
Treutter, D. (1989). Chemical reaction detection of catechins and proanthocyanidins with 4-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde. J. Chromatogr. A 467, 185–193. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9673(01)93963-9
Ullah, C., Tsai, C.-J., Unsicker, S. B., Xue, L., Reichelt, M., Gershenzon, J., et al. (2019). Salicylic acid activates poplar defense against the biotrophic rust fungus melampsora larici-populina via increased biosynthesis of catechin and proanthocyanidins. New Phytol. 221, 960–975. doi: 10.1111/nph.15396
Ursache, R., Andersen, T. G., Marhavý, P., Geldner, N. (2018). A protocol for combining fluorescent proteins with histological stains for diverse cell wall components. Plant J. 93, 399–412. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13784
Wallace, T. C., Giusti, M. M. (2010). Evaluation of parameters that affect the 4-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde assay for flavanols and proanthocyanidins. J. Food Sci. 75, C619–C625. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01734.x
Wang, Y., Singh, A. P., Hurst, W. J., Glinski, J. A., Koo, H., Vorsa, N. (2016). Influence of degree-of-polymerization and linkage on the quantification of proanthocyanidins using 4-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde (DMAC) assay. J. Agric. Food Chem. 64, 2190–2199. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b05408
Watrelot, A. A., Le Bourvellec, C., Imberty, A., Renard, C. M. G. C. (2013). Interactions between pectic compounds and procyanidins are influenced by methylation degree and chain length. Biomacromolecules 14, 709–718. doi: 10.1021/bm301796y
Watrelot, A. A., Norton, E. L. (2020). Chemistry and reactivity of tannins in vitis spp.: a review. Molecules 25 (9), 2110. doi: 10.3390/molecules25092110
Zhao, J. (2015). Flavonoid transport mechanisms: how to go, and with whom. Trends Plant Sci. 20, 576–585. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.06.007
Zhao, J., Dixon, R. A. (2009). MATE transporters facilitate vacuolar uptake of epicatechin 3’-o-glucoside for proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in medicago truncatula and arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21, 2323–2340. doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.067819
Keywords: cell-wall-bound proanthocyanidin, 4-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde (DMACA), fluorescence spectra determination, flavan-3-ol, localization, plant fluorescent dye characterization
Citation: Chowdhury J, Ferdous J, Lihavainen J, Albrectsen BR and Lundberg-Felten J (2023) Fluorogenic properties of 4-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde (DMACA) enable high resolution imaging of cell-wall-bound proanthocyanidins in plant root tissues. Front. Plant Sci. 13:1060804. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1060804
Received: 03 October 2022; Accepted: 27 December 2022;
Published: 16 January 2023.
Edited by:
Shengqing Shi, Chinese Academy of Forestry, ChinaReviewed by:
Jozef Mravec, University of Copenhagen, DenmarkYi Xiao, Dalian University of Technology, China
Copyright © 2023 Chowdhury, Ferdous, Lihavainen, Albrectsen and Lundberg-Felten. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jamil Chowdhury, m.chowdhury8@westernsydney.edu.au; mjcbari@gmail.com; Judith Lundberg-Felten, judith.lundberg-felten@slu.se
†Present address: Jamil Chowdhury, Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Hawkesbury Campus, Sydney, NSW, Australia