Tengfei Liu†
Kaixuan Duan- Department of Plant Pathology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a specialized plant pathogen that causes crown gall disease and is commonly used for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. As a pathogen, Agrobacterium triggers plant immunity, which affects transformation. However, the signaling components and pathways in plant immunity to Agrobacterium remain elusive. We demonstrate that two Arabidopsis mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases (MAPKKs) MKK4/MKK5 and their downstream mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) MPK3/MPK6 play major roles in both Agrobacterium-triggered immunity and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Agrobacteria induce MPK3/MPK6 activity and the expression of plant defense response genes at a very early stage. This process is dependent on the MKK4/MKK5 function. The loss of the function of MKK4 and MKK5 or their downstream MPK3 and MPK6 abolishes plant immunity to agrobacteria and increases transformation frequency, whereas the activation of MKK4 and MKK5 enhances plant immunity and represses transformation. Global transcriptome analysis indicates that agrobacteria induce various plant defense pathways, including reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, ethylene (ET), and salicylic acid- (SA-) mediated defense responses, and that MKK4/MKK5 is essential for the induction of these pathways. The activation of MKK4 and MKK5 promotes ROS production and cell death during agrobacteria infection. Based on these results, we propose that the MKK4/5-MPK3/6 cascade is an essential signaling pathway regulating Agrobacterium-mediated transformation through the modulation of Agrobacterium-triggered plant immunity.
Introduction
Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a plant pathogen that causes crown gall disease in a wide range of species (Smith and Townsend, 1907). This pathogen has the ability to mobilize and integrate a transfer DNA (T-DNA) segment from its tumor-inducing (Ti) plasmid to the host cell genome, leading to the formation of tumorous growths (Escobar and Dandekar, 2003). The transfer of T-DNA and several virulence effector proteins to the plant through a type IV secretion system (T4SS) is essential for transformation. Although the transient expression of a T-DNA-encoded gene can occur without the integration of T-DNA into the host cell genome, genetic transformation requires T-DNA integration (Gelvin, 2017). Taking advantage of this ability, A. tumefaciens has been modified for use in the plant genetic engineering method of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, which is better known than its role as a disease-causing bacterium (Azpiroz-Leehan and Feldmann, 1997).
Throughout the interaction between Agrobacterium and hosts, Agrobacterium infection triggers the innate immune response of the host, which is characterized by the induction of defense gene expression (Ditt et al., 2001, 2006; Veena et al., 2003; Duan et al., 2018). This response is elicited by the perception of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by specific plant receptors. A primary PAMP molecule originating from Agrobacterium is elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), which is perceived by the plant receptor EFR (Zipfel et al., 2006). Plant immunity induced by EF-Tu leads to reduced transformation by Agrobacterium (Zipfel et al., 2006). This finding demonstrates that plant immunity to Agrobacterium affects the transformation process. However, the detailed mechanism and signaling pathway of plant immunity to Agrobacterium remain unclear.
In plants, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades play essential roles in the processes of plant growth and development as well as in responses to environmental stimuli such as cold, heat, drought, and especially pathogen attack (Droillard et al., 2004; Brodersen et al., 2006; Colcombet and Hirt, 2008; Meng and Zhang, 2013; Xu and Zhang, 2015). These cascades comprised of MAPK kinase (MAPKKK), MAPKK (MAPK kinase), and MAPK proteins and link upstream receptors to downstream targets via a phosphorylation mechanism. Arabidopsis MAPKKK3/5-MKK4/5-MPK3/6 form a MAPK cascade together downstream of flagellin-sensitive 2 (FLS2) (Gomez-Gomez et al., 1999; Desikan et al., 2001; Asai et al., 2002; Nimchuk et al., 2003; Pfund et al., 2004; Sun et al., 2018). Another Arabidopsis MAPK cascade consisting of MEKK1, MKK1/2, and MPK4 is activated during pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) (Gao et al., 2008; Qiu et al., 2008). A recent study has shown that the Arabidopsis MKK4/5-MPK3/6 cascade plays a major role in plant stomatal immunity (Wang et al., 2007; Su et al., 2017). Previous research indicated that agrobacteria activate MPK3 during their infection process (Pitzschke et al., 2009). Even so, the function of MPK3 in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation remains unclear, and whether its involved pathway plays a role in the plant response to Agrobacterium or the transformation process requires further investigation.
Previous research has shown that salicylic acid (SA) and ethylene (ET) function as essential signaling molecules in plant defense to Agrobacterium and affect transformation (Lee et al., 2009). The exogenous application of SA to Agrobacterium cells inhibited the expression of vir genes, affecting bacterial growth, bacterial attachment to plant cells, and virulence (Yuan et al., 2007; Anand et al., 2008). At the beginning of Agrobacterium infection (3-h postinfection), the level of 1-amino-cyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC), an ET precursor, is elevated in the presence of both virulent and disarmed Agrobacterium strains (Lee et al., 2009). The inoculation of melon explants with Agrobacterium also increases ET production (Ezura et al., 2000). The application of ACC reduces Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of melon, whereas the addition of aminoethoxyvinylglycine, an inhibitor of ACC synthase, increases transformation (Ezura et al., 2000). Thus, ET and SA derived from the host plant have effects on the defense response to Agrobacterium and transformation.
Here, we report that Arabidopsis MKK4 and MKK5, as well as their downstream kinases MPK3 and MPK6, play major roles in Agrobacterium-triggered immunity and transformation. They are involved in plant immunity to Agrobacterium through the regulation of plant defense pathways, including defense-responsive gene expression, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and the synthesis of ET and SA. Together, these data indicate that the MKK4/5-MPK3/6 cascade is an essential signaling pathway contributing to plant immunity to Agrobacterium and regulating Agrobacterium-mediated transformation through the modulation of Agrobacterium-triggered immunity in Arabidopsis. Based on these findings, we propose that the MKK4/5-MPK3/6 module can be modified in the future to promote the application of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation technology in other species.
Materials and Methods
Plant Materials and Growth Conditions
The Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 ecotype was used in this study. Arabidopsis plants were grown in a growth chamber at 22°C, with 10 h-day/14 h-night photoperiod and 100 μmol m−2 s−1 light intensity. Mutants mpk3-1 (Salk_151594), mpk6-2 (Salk_073907), and acs2/6/4/5/9 (CS16644) were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC). MPK6SR (mpk3 mpk6 PMPK6:MPK6YG), MKK4-DD, NahG, and mkk4/mkk5 double mutants were kindly provided by Dr. Suqun Zhang (University of Missouri, MO, USA). To generate MKK5-DD and MEK2-DD transgenic lines, Arabidopsis MKK5 and tobacco NtMEK2 complementary DNAs (cDNAs) were cloned as described in previous studies (Yang et al., 2001; Ren et al., 2002). The mutant cDNAs with a FLAG epitope at their N-termini were subcloned into the steroid-inducible pTA7002 binary vector (Aoyama and Chua, 1997). Then, the constructs were transferred into GV3101 to be transformed into Col-0 plants using the floral-dip method.
Infection by Agrobacteria for Transcriptome and Gene Expression Analysis
For gene expression analysis, Arabidopsis was cultured in half-strength Murashige and Skoog (1/2 MS) liquid medium for 10 days. The resulting 10-day-old seedlings were mock treated (1/2 MS liquid medium only) or treated with 2 × 108 cfu/ml GV3101 agrobacteria cells suspended in 1/2 MS liquid medium without shaking. Samples were harvested at four time points (3, 6, 12, and 24 h postinoculation (hpi) with agrobacteria). Three replicates were performed for each treatment. The seedlings were harvested at each time point and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen; within each replicates, all seedlings were pooled together for RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis.
Plant Total RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from infected Arabidopsis seedlings using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). First-strand cDNA was synthesized from the extracted messenger RNA (mRNA) using oligo dT primer and reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). qRT-PCR was performed using a Bio-Rad CFX96 Real-Time System and iQ™ SYBR® Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) with 40 cycles. Templates were normalized with Arabidopsis UBQ10. Three biological and technical replicates were performed. Data were analyzed using the BioRad CFX Manager 2.0 Software. The comparative cycle threshold method (ΔΔCt) was used to obtain the relative fold change. Primer information is provided in Supplementary Table 1.
RNA-Sequencing Analysis
For RNA-sequence (RNA-seq) analysis, 10-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings of Col-0 and mkk4/5 were mock treated or treated with agrobacteria for 24 h. The seedlings were collected individually and frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen for RNA-seq. Three biological replicates were performed. Total RNA was used to make RNA-seq libraries with the Illumina TruSeq RNA Sample Preparation Kit v2 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) following the recommendations of the manufacturer. These libraries were sequenced by Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI, Shenzhen, China).
The clean reads of all RNA-seq data obtained from BGI were mapped to A. thaliana TAIR10 genome by hisat2 (version 2.1.0) with default parameters. However, the above mapped SAM files were sorted and indexed by SAMtools (version 1.5). The expression data were calculated using featureCounts (v1.6.1) in default setting (Li et al., 2009; Liao et al., 2014; Kim et al., 2019). Genes with at least two-fold changes of expression in agrobacteria treatment compared to the mock treatment were identified as agrobacteria-responsive genes (ARGs). ARGs that were no longer induced by agrobacteria in mkk4/5 were identified as MKK4/MKK5-dependent ARGs.
Infection of Whole Arabidopsis Seedlings to Evaluate Transformation Frequency
To evaluate transformation frequency in whole Arabidopsis seedlings, the AGROBEST infection assay was used (Wu et al., 2014). Ten-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings grown in 1/2 MS liquid medium were infected with 108 cfu/ml GV3101-pBISN1. At 3-day postinfection (dpi), seedlings were harvested for histochemical β-glucuronidase (GUS) staining and activity testing.
Agrobacterium-Mediated Stable Transformation Assay
The A. tumefaciens tumorigenic strain A208 was used for stable transformation assays. Roots from 14-day-old Arabidopsis plants grown in sterile square Petri dishes containing sterile Gamborg's B5 medium were cut into ~5-mm segments. Root segments were assayed as described by Tenea et al. (2009). Tumors were scored after 30-day cultivation on MS medium. Three replicates were performed for each experiment. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test.
Histochemical GUS Staining and Activity Assays
For histochemical GUS staining, infected seedlings were stained in 0.2 mg/L 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl glucuronide (X-Gluc) solution at 37°C overnight and then destained with 70% ethanol for observation. β-galactosidase activity was assessed with a fluorescent substrate (4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-glucuronide (MUG assay)) to quantitatively determine GUS activity. These assays were performed according to the method of Jefferson et al. (1987). All of these were detected at 3 days after infection. Three replicates were performed.
Plant Total Protein Extraction and Immunoblot Analysis
Seedlings cultured for 10 days in liquid 1/2 MS medium were used for protein extraction. These 10-day-old seedlings were mock treated (1/2 MS liquid medium only) or treated with agrobacteria cells suspended in 1/2 MS liquid medium. Samples were harvested at four time points (5, 15, 30, and 60 min). Total protein was extracted from the whole seedlings in an extraction buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl at pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 1 mM Na3VO4, 10 mM NaF, 10% glycerol, and 1 × protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA)]. The concentration of each protein extract was determined using the Bio-Rad protein assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) with bovine serum albumin as the standard.
For the immunoblot analysis, anti-FLAG (F3165, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and anti-pTEpY (#4696, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) antibodies were used to detect MKK4-DD, MKK5-DD, and NtMEK2-DD protein expression and MPK3/MPK6 activation, respectively.
Leaf Infiltration for H2O2 Detection and Cell Death Analysis
The leaf infiltration of Arabidopsis with Agrobacterium GV3101 carrying pBISN1 (GV3101-pBISN1) Arabidopsis was performed as described previously (Wroblewski et al., 2005). Agrobacteria cells resuspended in an infiltration buffer (10 mM MES, 10 mM MgCl2, and 100 μM acetosyringone at pH 5.6) were injected into 4-week-old plant leaves. Then, the leaves were used for H2O2 detection and cell death analysis.
H2O2 Detection
H2O2 was detected by the 3,3′-diaminobezidine (DAB) uptake method, which is an endogenous peroxidase-dependent in situ histochemical staining procedure using DAB (Thordal-Christensen et al., 1997). Leaves that were infiltrated with agrobacteria or mock infiltrated and treated with dexamethasone (DEX) were detached and placed in DAB solution (1 mg/ml, pH 5.5) for 2 h. The leaves were then boiled in ethanol (96%) for 10 min and then stored in 96% ethanol. H2O2 production is visualized as a reddish-brown coloration.
Determination of Endogenous Levels of SA
Ten-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings were infected with agrobacteria cells suspended in 1/2 MS liquid medium (2 × 108 cfu/ml) or mock infected (1/2 MS liquid medium only). Samples were harvested at 24 h after inoculation and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Approximately 100 mg of each sample was suspended in 90% (V/V) methanol at a ratio of 1:1000. Samples were vortexed, sonicated for 15 min, and centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 20 min two times. The supernatant was transferred to a tube, and the SA solution was filtered and separated on a C18 analytical column (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and detected using fluorescence (excitation at 305 nm, emission at 405 nm; Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The mobile phase used for HPLC was 90% methanol and 0.1% formic acid with a flow rate of 0.8 ml/min.
Statistical Analysis
All data were analyzed using Student's t-test.
Results
Agrobacterium Infection Leads to Rapid MPK3/MPK6 Activation and Defense-Responsive Gene Induction in Arabidopsis
The activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and the induction of defense-responsive gene expression are the early steps in the immune response after plants sense an invading pathogen (Hammond-Kosack and Jones, 1996; Zhang and Klessig, 2001). To elucidate the plant immune response to Agrobacterium, currently we used Arabidopsis model to profile MPK3/MPK6 activation and defense-responsive gene expression during the Agrobacterium infection process. In this system, 10-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings of wild-type (WT) (Col-0) cultured in liquid medium were infected with the disarmed hyper-virulent Agrobacterium strain GV3101. Samples were harvested at various postinfection time points. Then, MPK3/MPK6 activity and defense-responsive gene expression were assessed. The results showed that, compared with mock treatment, agrobacteria infection triggered a strong and rapid activation of MPK3/MPK6 (Figure 1A). During the agrobacteria infection process, the MPK3 and MPK6 activity reached peak levels at as early as 15 min postinfection and then decreased dynamically over time (Figure 1A). Meanwhile, after mock treatment, the MPK3 and MPK6 activity remained at a stable and low level during the whole stage, which was much lower than the level after inoculation with agrobacteria and showed no changes during the whole process (Figure 1A). Interestingly, we also observed other bands besides MPK3/MPK6 after agrobacteria infection. We inferred that another MAPK MPK4 is potentially activated by agrobacteria (Figure 1A). This finding demonstrates that MPK3/MPK6 signaling is involved in the process through which plants sense agrobacteria invasion. The expression of defense-responsive genes, such as FRK1, NHL10, At2g17740, and CRK11, was measured during the agrobacteria infection process. The results showed that the expression of these genes was strongly induced by agrobacteria inoculation, especially at the early stages (e.g., 3 and 6 h postinfection), but as infection time progressed, this induction faded somewhat (Figures 1B–E). In the mock treatment, the expression of these genes remained at very low levels, with no changes during the treatment process (Figures 1B–E). Together, these results demonstrate that MPK3/MPK6 activity and defense-responsive gene expression resulted from agrobacteria infection. Thus, we conclude that Agrobacterium can trigger plant immune responses, characterized by a rapid activation of MPK3/MPK6 and the induction of defense-responsive gene expression.
Figure 1. Agrobacterium leads to a rapid and strong MPK3/6 activation and defense-responsive gene expression. (A) Agrobacteria induce MPK3/MPK6 activation. Ten-day-old wild type (WT) (Col-0) seedlings grown in liquid 1/2 Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium were inoculated with mock (1/2 liquid MS medium only) and 2 × 108 cfu/ml GV3101 suspension cells (suspended in 1/2 liquid MS medium) for the indicated time, respectively. Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation was detected by the immunoblot analysis using an anti-pTEpY antibody. Equal loading was confirmed by PONCEAU S staining. (B–E) Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis of some defense genes kinetic expression in WT (Col-0) infected by agrobacteria or mock treatment. Total RNA was extracted from a 10-day-old seedling treated as described in (A). Relative gene expression levels are shown for: (B) FRK1, (C) NHL10, (D) At2g17740, and (E) CRK11. UBQ10 was used as an internal control. “Agro” is an abbreviation of Agrobacterium. Values represent the average of three replicates with error bars indicating SD of the mean.
Arabidopsis mkk4 and mkk5 Are Essential to Agrobacterium-Triggered Immunity
Previous studies have demonstrated that MKK4 and MKK5 are the upstream MAPKKs of MPK3/MPK6 that regulate the plant defense response and root development (Asai et al., 2002; Su et al., 2017; Shao et al., 2020). Because agrobacteria infection leads to a rapid and strong MPK3/MPK6 activation, we investigated whether MKK4 and MKK5 are required for the plant immune response to Agrobacterium. Here, we used mkk4/mkk5 double mutants generated from previously reported mkk4 and mkk5 single mutants (Zhao et al., 2014; Su et al., 2017) to determine the functions of these two MAPKKs in Agrobacterium-triggered immunity. After the inoculation of 10-day-old WT (Col-0) and mkk4/5 with the agrobacteria strain GV3101, samples were collected at various time points. MPK3/MPK6 activity and defense-responsive gene expression were measured. The results indicated that MPK3/MPK6 activity was induced and reached a high level at 15 min after the inoculation with agrobacteria in WT Col-0. However, this activity was abolished in mkk4/mkk5 double mutants (Figure 2A). Compared with the WT, MPK3/MPK6 activity induced by agrobacteria was impaired in mkk4/mkk5 double mutants (Figure 2A). Although some MPK3/MPK6 activities remained in mkk4/5 double mutants, it was much weaker than in WT (Figure 2A). These results demonstrate that MKK4/MKK5 are required for the induction of MPK3/MPK6 activity by agrobacteria and act upstream of MPK3/MPK6.
Figure 2. Agrobacterium-triggered immunity in Arabidopsis is dependent on MKK4 and MKK5. (A) The loss of the function of MKK4 and MKK5 compromises Agrobacterium-induced MPK3/MPK6 activation. Ten-day-old WT (Col-0) and mkk4/5 double-mutant seedlings grown in liquid 1/2 MS medium were treated as described in Figure 1A. MAPK activation was detected by the immunoblot analysis using an anti-pTEpY antibody. Equal loading was confirmed by PONCEAU S staining. (B–E) The loss of the function of MKK4 and MKK5 compromises Agrobacterium-induced defense gene expression. Total RNA was extracted from 10-day-old WT (Col-0) and mkk4/5 double-mutant seedlings treated as described in Figure 1A. Relative gene expression levels are shown for: (B) FRK1, (C) NHL10, (D) At2g17740, and (E) CRK11. UBQ10 was used as an internal control. “Agro” is an abbreviation of Agrobacterium. Values represent the average of three replicates with error bars indicating SD of the mean. “**” indicates a significant difference at p < 0.01 with Student's t-test.
Meanwhile, our results revealed that the expression of some defense-responsive genes, such as FRK1, NHL10, At2g17740, and CRK11, was significantly impaired in mkk4/5 double mutants during agrobacteria infection, whereas the expression of those genes was strongly induced in WT, as indicated above (Figures 2B–E). Together, these results indicate that MPK3/MPK6 activity and defense-responsive gene expression induced by agrobacteria are highly dependent on the MKK4 and MKK5 function, and MKK4 and MKK5 are essential to Agrobacterium-triggered immunity.
MKK4 and MKK5 Regulate Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation
Impaired plant immunity has been found to lead to increased transformation by Agrobacterium (Zipfel et al., 2006). As we have established that plant immune responses to agrobacteria are impaired in the mkk4/5 double mutants, we hypothesized that the mkk4/5 double mutant will exhibit a phenotype of enhanced Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Hence, we employed two different transformation systems, namely transient (AGROBEST) and stable transformation (tumorigenesis induced by agrobacteria), to evaluate how the impaired immunity of this mutant affects the transformation. Firstly, we evaluated the transient transformation frequency in the whole seedling using the AGROBEST infection method (Wu et al., 2014). Ten-day-old seedlings of WT (Col-0) and mkk4/5 double mutants cultured in liquid medium were infected with the hyper-virulent nontumorigenic Agrobacterium strain GV3101 containing the binary vector pBISN1-GUS, which carries a GUS intron gene allowing its expression only in plants but not in Agrobacterium (GV3101-pBISN1). Then, GUS activity was assessed to monitor the transient expression efficiency at 3 dpi. Compared with WT plants, stronger and more concentrated spots of GUS staining were detected in mkk4/5 double-mutant seedlings at 3 dpi (Figure 3A). The enzymatic activity of GUS was ~1.8-fold greater in mkk4/5 double mutants than in WT (Figure 3A). Moreover, stable transformation via tumorigenesis was tested to confirm the function of MKK4/MKK5 in transformation. Root segments were infected with the tumorigenic A. tumefaciens strain A208 (Nam et al., 1997; Shi et al., 2014), and the root tumorigenesis efficiency was analyzed. Our results showed that compared to the WT, the mkk4/5 mutant exhibited ~1.8-fold greater tumorigenesis efficiency (Figure 3B), supporting the hypothesis that MKK4/MKK5 signaling is an important pathway in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation via the regulation of plant immunity.
Figure 3. MKK4/MKK5 regulate Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. (A) Agrobacterium-mediated transient transformation in mkk4/5 double mutant by using the AGROBEST system. Ten-day-old Arabidopsis whole seedlings of WT (Col-0) (upper panel) and mkk4/5 double mutants (lower panel) were infected with 108 cfu/ml GV3101-pBISN1 suspension cells, and transformation frequency was measured by histochemical β-glucuronidase (GUS) staining (left) and 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-glucuronide (MUG) assay (right) at 3-day postinfection (dpi). (B) Agrobacterium-mediated stable transformation in mkk4/5 double mutants by using the tumorigenesis system. Root segments from 14-day-old Arabidopsis WT (Col-0), mkk4/5 double-mutant plants were inoculated with 106 cfu/ml of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains A208. Tumors were scored at 30 days after infection. Values represent the average of three replicates with error bars indicating SD of the mean. “**” indicates a significant difference at p < 0.01 with Student's t-test. The scale bar indicates 5 mm.
Gain-of-Function Activation of MKK4 or MKK5 Increases Plant Immunity to Agrobacterium and Represses Transformation
Previous studies have demonstrated that gain-of-function activation of MKK4 or MKK5 were effectively inducing the plant defense responses in tobacco and Arabidopsis using transgenic lines with DEX-inducible MKK4 and MKK5 activities, respectively (Asai et al., 2002; Ren et al., 2002). To further elucidate the functions of MKK4 and MKK5 in the plant immune response to Agrobacterium and transformation, we analyzed the transgenic lines with DEX-inducible activity of both MKK4 and MKK5, designated as MKK4-DD and MKK5-DD, in which MKK4/MKK5 gene expression was induced by DEX. Firstly, we tested MPK3/MPK6 activation in DEX-inducible MKK4-DD and MKK5-DD transgenic lines. The results showed a strong MPK3/MPK6 activation in MKK4-DD and MKK5-DD transgenic lines after DEX treatment (Figure 4A), indicating that active MKK4/MKK5 can lead to the activation of MPK3/MPK6 and confirming that MKK4/MKK5 function upstream of MPK3/MPK6. The expression of defense-responsive genes, such as CRK11 and NHL10, was also tested in the MKK4-DD and MKK5-DD transgenic lines. After DEX treatment, CRK11 and NHL10 expression was dramatically induced in the MKK4-DD and MKK5-DD transgenic lines compared with in the WT, whereas DEX itself had no direct effect on the expression of these two genes in the WT (Figure 4B), indicating that DEX-induced defense-responsive gene expression in MKK4-DD and MKK5-DD plants resulted from MKK4/MKK5 activation.
Figure 4. The activation of MKK4 or MKK5 in Arabidopsis increases the plant immunity to Agrobacterium and represses the transformation. (A) MKK4-DD or MKK5-DD protein expression and MPK3/MPK6 activation in MKK4-DD and MKK5-DD transgenic seedlings after induction by dexamethasone (DEX). Ten-day-old seedlings grown in 1/2 MS liquid medium were treated with mock (ethanol) or DEX (5 μM) for overnight before test. The induction of MKK4-DD or MKK5-DD expression and MPK3/MPK6 activation were detected by the immunoblot analysis using anti-FLAG and anti-pTEpY antibodies, respectively. Equal loading was confirmed by PONCEAU S staining. (B) The induction of defense gene expressions in MKK4-DD and MKK5-DD transgenic seedlings. After DEX pretreatment, total RNA was extracted from 10-day-old WT (Col-0), MKK4-DD, and MKK5-DD transgenic plants. Transcript levels were determined by qRT-PCR for NHL10 (left) and CRK11 (right). UBQ10 was used as an internal control. (C) The evaluation of transformation frequency in MKK4-DD or MKK5-DD transgenic seedlings compared with WT (Col-0) by using the AGROBEST system. After pretreatment with mock (ethanol) or DEX, 10-day-old Arabidopsis whole seedlings of WT (Col-0), MKK4-DD, and MKK5-DD transgenic lines were infected with 108 cfu/ml GV3101-pBISN1 suspension cells, and transformation frequency was measured by histochemical GUS staining (left) and MUG assay (right) at 3 dpi. (D) Stable transformation frequency of MKK4-DD or MKK5-DD transgenic seedlings compared with WT (Col-0) by using the tumorigenesis system. After pretreatment with mock (ethanol) or DEX, root segments from 14-day-old Arabidopsis WT (Col-0), MKK4-DD and MKK5-DD transgenic plants were inoculated with 106 cfu/ml of the A. tumefaciens strains A208. Tumors were scored at 30 days after infection. Values represent the average of three replicates with error bars indicating SD of the mean. “**” indicates a significant difference at p < 0.01 with Student's t-test. The scale bar indicates 5 mm.
Meanwhile, we assessed the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation frequency of the MKK4-DD and MKK5-DD transgenic lines. Using the AGROBEST method, WT (Col-0), MKK4-DD, and MKK5-DD transgenic plants were infected with GV3101-pBISN1. The GUS staining results showed that in DEX-treated samples, MKK4-DD and MKK5-DD plants exhibited a much lower transformation frequency at 3 dpi (Figure 4C). The measurement of GUS enzymatic activity showed that MKK4-DD and MKK5-DD plants had ~two-fold lower levels than WT after DEX treatment (Figure 4C). DEX had no effect on transformation frequency in WT (Figure 4C), demonstrating that the DEX-induced reduction of transformation frequency in MKK4-DD and MKK5-DD plants resulted from increased MKK4/MKK5 activation. Additionally, the tumorigenesis analysis was used to evaluate the stable transformation frequency of MKK4-DD and MKK5-DD transgenic plants. The tumorigenesis analysis showed the lower transformation frequency in MKK4-DD and MKK5-DD plants after DEX treatment, with fewer tumors in roots compared with WT (Figure 4D). Together, these results indicate that the activation of MKK4/MKK5 represses the transformation by agrobacteria, which may be due to the increases in MPK3/MPK6 activity and plant immunity.
Tobacco NtMEK2 is a homolog of Arabidopsis MKK4 and MKK5 (Ren et al., 2002). Previous research demonstrated that after DEX treatment, gain-of-function GVG-NtMEK2DD transgenic Arabidopsis had high activation levels of MPK3 and MPK6 (Su et al., 2017), showing similar results to the MPK3/MPK6 activation pattern in MKK4-DD and MKK5-DD plants. As a result, we inferred that NtMEK2-DD transgenic Arabidopsis showed a similar response to agrobacteria. Unsurprisingly, when treated with DEX, NtMEK2-DD transgenic plants exhibited strong MPK3 and MPK6 activities (Supplementary Figure 1). After DEX treatment, NtMEK2-DD transgenic plants had much higher expression levels of CRK11 and NHL10 compared with WT, and DEX alone had no effect on WT (Supplementary Figure 1).
Similarly, transformation frequency was evaluated in NtMEK2-DD transgenic seedlings. In 3 days after inoculation with GV3101-pBISN1, the seedlings were stained in X-Gluc solution overnight. GUS staining appeared in more areas in WT (Col-0) seedlings than in NtMEK2-DD transgenic seedlings after DEX treatment (Supplementary Figure 1). The detection of GUS activity indicated 2.3-fold lower activity in NtMEK2-DD transgenic seedlings compared with the WT (Col-0) after DEX induction (Supplementary Figure 1). GUS staining and activity showed no changes in WT (Col-0) with DEX treatment, indicating that the lower transformation frequency in NtMEK2-DD transgenic seedlings resulted from DEX-induced MKK4/MKK5 activation.
Together, these results support the conclusion that MKK4/MKK5 and their homolog NtMEK2 play a positive role in plant immunity to Agrobacterium by activating MPK3/MPK6. The activation of MPK3/MPK6 and of downstream defense pathways are the important processes in the repression of transformation by Agrobacterium.
Arabidopsis MPK3 and MPK6 Act Downstream of MKK4 and MKK5 in Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation
MKK4 and MKK5 are the upstream MAPKKs of MPK3/MPK6 in the regulation of plant defense responses (Asai et al., 2002; Su et al., 2017), and our data demonstrate that MKK4 and MKK5 also function upstream of MPK3/MPK6 in Agrobacterium-triggered immunity. Based on these results, we investigated whether these two MAPKs MPK3/MPK6 also regulate plant transformation by Agrobacterium. Our results reveal no significant transformation difference in mpk3 and mpk6 single mutants compared with the WT after inoculation with Agrobacterium GV3103-pBISN1 (Supplementary Figure 2), indicating that functional redundancy between MPK3 and MPK6 may exist in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. As a result, a conditional mpk3/mpk6 double-mutant, MPK6SR, which is sensitive to NA-PP1 (a kinase inhibitor) (Su et al., 2017; Shao et al., 2020), was used for the analysis of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in Arabidopsis. NA-PP1 makes the activity of MPK6SR plants nulls that are equivalent to mpk3/mpk6 double mutants (Xu et al., 2014; Su et al., 2017; Shao et al., 2020). Using this genetic material, we tested the frequency of transformation by Agrobacterium. After inoculation with GV3101-pBISN1, GUS staining and activity were detected in WT and MPK6SR seedlings. Compared with the WT, MPK6SR seedlings exhibited a higher transformation frequency, with a stronger GUS staining, and a 1.7-fold increase in GUS activity after treatment with NA-PP1 (Figure 5A). In the absence of the inhibitor NA-PP1, MPK6SR seedlings behaved like WT control (Figure 5A). Moreover, NA-PP1 itself had no effect on the transformation in WT (Col-0), demonstrating the specificity of NA-PP1 in plant transformation to MPK6SR lines.
Figure 5. MPK3/MPK6 regulate Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. (A) The loss of the function of MPK3 and MPK6 increases plant transformation by Agrobacterium when tested with the AGROBEST system. WT (Col-0) and MPK6SR 10-day-old seedlings were pretreated with mock (dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) control) or NA-PP1 (15 μM) for overnight and then inoculated with 108 cfu/ml GV3101-pBISN1 suspension cells. GUS staining (left) and MUG assay (right) were measured at 3 dpi. (B) The loss of the function of MPK3 and MPK6 increases Agrobacterium-mediated stable transformation by using the tumorigenesis system. WT (Col-0) and MPK6SR 14-day-old plants were pretreated with mock (DMSO control) or NA-PP1 (15 μM) for overnight, and root segments were inoculated with 106 cfu/ml of the A. tumefaciens strains A208. Tumors were scored at 30 days after infection. Values represent the average of three replicates with error bars indicating SD of the mean. “**” indicates a significant difference at p < 0.01 with Student's t-test. The scale bar indicates 5 mm.
We confirmed this result through the tumorigenesis analysis. As shown in Figure 5B, compared with WT, NA-PP1-treated MPK6SR roots had a much higher stable transformation frequency (Col-0), with more tumors in the roots. NA-PP1 itself had no effect on tumorigenesis in WT (Col-0). These results indicate that MPK3 and MPK6 act downstream of MKK4 and MKK5 to regulate Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.
Global Transcriptome Analysis Indicated MKK4/MKK5 Regulate Plant Defense Pathways During Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation
Throughout the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation process, the host plants exhibit dynamic gene expression patterns in response to Agrobacterium. Changes in host gene expression patterns throughout the transformation process have effects on transformation frequency. To clarify the mechanisms of MKK4/MKK5 in regulating the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation process, global transcriptome analysis was performed to compare WT and mkk4/5 double-mutant plants. After data analysis, genes were considered significantly differentially expressed if they had a false discovery rate of less than 0.05 and a change in expression between the two treatments of at least two-fold. Overall, 7,702 unique genes in WT (blue circle) and 7,810 (yellow circle) in mkk4/5 were differentially expressed in the agrobacteria treatment relative to the mock treatment (Figure 6A). Of these genes, 5,065 were differentially expressed between treatments in both WT and mkk4/5 (Figure 6A). In total, 3,905 unique genes were induced by agrobacteria treatment relative to the mock treatment in WT, of which 694 showed no expression changes in mkk4/5 plants between the agrobacterium and mock treatments (Figure 6B). This finding indicates that these 694 genes are regulated by MKK4/MKK5 in the agrobacteria infection process and may be the major factors involved in the regulation of transformation by MKK4/MKK5.
Figure 6. Global transcriptome analysis indicates that Agrobacterium-triggered plant defense pathways are dependent on MKK4/MKK5 function. (A) A Venn diagram displaying sets of differentially expressed genes in the WT (blue circle) or mkk4/5 double mutant (yellow circle) to the comparisons between the treatment with mock and Agrobacterium strain GV3101. (B) A Venn diagram displaying sets of upregulated genes after agrobacteria treatment in WT (pink circle) while no expression changes in mkk4/5 double mutants (green circle). (C) Selected overrepresented gene ontology (GO) biological process categories in WT induced by agrobacteria treatment. Sets of genes used to determine significantly enriched GO terms were those found to be differentially expressed at p < 0.05 significance level and showed at least a two-fold change in expression. The included categories are those found to be significantly enriched (p < 0.01) among upregulated gene in agrobacteria treatment. (D) Selected overrepresented GO biological process categories, which are induced by agrobacteria in WT while no changes in mkk4/5 double-mutant plants. P-values from each category enrichment test have been negatively log10-transformed and plotted. “Gene number” indicates how many genes involved in each categories.
We employed the gene ontology (GO) analysis to categorize the 3,905 agrobacteria-induced genes in WT to investigate wide-scale changes in gene expression related to specific cellular and biological processes. Figure 6C shows the degree to which selected GO biological process categories were overrepresented. Categories including “defense response to bacteria,” “response to SA,” “response to hydrogen peroxide,” “cellular response to oxidative stress,” “cell death,” and “response to jasmonic acid” are overrepresented among agrobacteria-induced genes in WT (Figure 6C, Supplementary Figure 3, Supplementary Material 1), indicating that agrobacteria induce a broad range of plant immune responses. In contrast, 694 of these genes, which were no expression changes in mkk4/5 mutant plants, were also categorized. The categories “defense response to bacteria,” “response to SA,” “response to hydrogen peroxide,” and “innate immune response” are overrepresented among these genes showing no change in expression (Figure 6D, Supplementary Figure 4, Supplementary Material 2). Thus, most plant defense pathways induced by agrobacteria were abolished in mkk4/5 mutant plants, further confirming that MKK4/MKK5 signaling is indispensable in the plant immune response to agrobacteria. Together, these results demonstrate that agrobacteria infection generally induces plant stress and defense response pathways, which are dependent on MKK4/MKK5 activity.
MKK4/MKK5 Regulate ROS Production and Cell Death in Agrobacteria Infection
The production of ROS and cell death are active defense mechanisms of plants against invading pathogens. Our global transcriptome data indicated that the “response to hydrogen peroxide,” “cellular response to oxidative stress,” and “cell death” pathways were induced during the agrobacteria infection process, indicating that plants produced ROS and underwent cell death to counteract agrobacteria infection. To confirm the function of MKK4/MKK5 in Agrobacterium-mediated ROS production and cell death, leaves from a 4-week-old seedling of WT (Col-0), MKK4-DD, and MKK5-DD were inoculated with agrobacteria GV3101 through leaf infiltration, and then the H2O2 production and cell death were assessed. As shown in Figure 7A (upper layer), in the absence of agrobacteria, the reddish-brown precipitants of oxidized DAB, an indication of H2O2 production, were visible in the leaves of MKK4-DD, MKK5-DD transgenic plants pretreated with DEX as an inducer. As controls, the leaves of Col-0 plants were pretreated with DEX and processed alongside inoculated leaves, and no H2O2 generation was observed in these control leaves. The leaves from Col-0, MKK4-DD, and MKK5-DD transgenic plants clearly exhibited no H2O2 generation in the absence of DEX (Figure 7A, upper layer). However, in the presence of agrobacteria, the leaves of Col-0, MKK4-DD, and MKK5-DD transgenic plants all produced H2O2 (Figure 7A, lower layer). In this analysis, H2O2 production was also detected when the plants were pretreated with DEX, and the resulting H2O2 production was much greater in MKK4-DD and MKK5-DD transgenic plants than in plants treated only with DEX (Figure 7A), indicating that agrobacteria infection can induce ROS production in plants and that DEX-induced MKK4 and MKK5 activation promotes ROS production during the agrobacteria infection process.
Figure 7. MKK4/MKK5 regulate reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and cell death during Agrobacterium infection process. (A) The activation of MKK4/MKK5 promotes the generation of H2O2 during the agrobacteria infection process. Arabidopsis Col-0, MKK4-DD, and MKK5-DD transgenic plants were sprayed with 15 μM DEX. After overnight of DEX treatment, the plant leaves were infiltrated with infiltration buffer (buffer) or GV3101 suspension cells (suspended in infiltration buffer). The H2O2 generation was detected by immersing the leaves in 3,3′-diaminobezidine (DAB) solution (1 mg/ml, pH 5.5) for 2 h. After the leaves were boiled in ethanol (70%) for 10 min to remove the chlorophyll, H2O2 production was visualized as a reddish-brown coloration. (B) The activation of MKK4/MKK5 promotes the cell death during the agrobacteria infection process. Col-0, MKK4-DD, and MKK5-DD transgenic plants were pretreated with 15 μM DEX. After DEX treatment, the plant leaves were infiltrated with infiltration buffer (buffer) or GV3101 suspension cells (suspended with infiltration buffer). Infiltrated leaves were collected at indicated times (1, 2, and 5 dpi). Cell death was observed and the photographs were taken. The scale bar indicates 5 mm.
Similarly, cell death during the agrobacteria infection process in Col-0, MKK4-DD, and MKK5-DD transgenic plants was investigated. As shown in Figure 7B, among the leaves of Col-0, MKK4-DD, and MKK5-DD transgenic plants pretreated with DEX for 1 day but not inoculated with agrobacteria, only MKK5-DD plants showed very low levels of cell death while all plants without DEX treatment had no cell death. In the presence of agrobacteria inoculation at 1 dpi or 1 day after DEX treatment, the leaves of Col-0, MKK4-DD, and MKK5-DD transgenic plants without DEX treatment had no cell death; however, after pretreatment with DEX, enhanced cell death was observed in MKK5-DD transgenic plants, with no cell death observed in Col-0, MKK4-DD plants (Figure 7B). At 2 dpi or 2 days after DEX treatment, in the absence of agrobacteria inoculation, the leaves from MKK4-DD and MKK5-DD transgenic plants pretreated with DEX showed higher levels of cell death compared to Col-0 plants, and no cell death occurred in plants without DEX treatment. However, in the presence of agrobacteria inoculation, cell death was enhanced in DEX pretreated MKK4-DD and MKK5-DD transgenic plant leaves compared to leaves without agrobacteria inoculation. As controls, no cell death was observed in Col-0, MKK4-DD, and MKK5-DD transgenic plants without DEX pretreated and agrobacteria inoculation. At 5 dpi or 5 days after DEX treatment, cell death was observed in MKK4-DD, and MKK5-DD transgenic plants when pretreated with DEX and in DEX pretreated agrobacteria-infiltrated leaves. As controls, agrobacteria-infiltrated Col-0, MKK4-DD, and MKK5-DD plants also exhibited clear cell death, whereas no cell death was observed in buffer-infiltrated Col-0, MKK4-DD, or MKK5-DD plants.
Based on these results, we conclude that agrobacteria can induce plant ROS production at an early infection stage (1 dpi) and cell death at a late infection stage (5 dpi), and that the activation of MKK4/MKK5 promotes agrobacteria-induced ROS production and cell death. Thus, ROS production and cell death are involved in plant immunity and regulated by MKK4/MKK5. This pathway may be one factor influencing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.
MKK4/MKK5 Regulate SA Synthesis in Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation
Salicylic acid is an important compound in plant defense (Vlot et al., 2009). Previous research demonstrated that plants with constitutively active MPK3 plants accumulate SA (Geno et al., 2017). SA accumulated at 6 days after inoculation with agrobacteria (Lee et al., 2009). Our transcriptome data indicated that SA signaling is a plant defense response to Agrobacterium. To explore whether SA is involved in MKK4/MKK5-regulated Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, we first examined the expression of SA synthesis genes AtPBS3, AtICS1, AtEDS5 (Rekhter et al., 2019; Torrens-Spence et al., 2019) in the WT, and mkk4/5 double mutant. As shown in Figures 8A,B, AtPBS3 was induced after agrobacteria inoculation in the WT (Col-0), but this induction effect was impaired in mkk4/5 double mutants. AtICS1 and AtEDS5 gene expressions were induced by agrobacteria inoculation in the WT, but the expression of AtICS1 was higher in the mkk4/5 mutant than in WT and AtEDS5 expression showed no difference between mkk4/5 double mutants and the WT (Col-0) mutant (Supplementary Figure 5). We then measured SA levels in plants when inoculated with agrobacteria. Whole WT (Col-0) and mkk4/5 seedlings were harvested after inoculation with agrobacteria, and their SA contents were determined via HPLC. No significant difference between the WT and mkk4/5 was found in the absence of agrobacteria inoculation (Figure 8C). Agrobacteria inoculation induced SA accumulation in WT, but this induction was abolished in the mkk4/5 mutant (Figure 8C), indicating that the loss of the function of MKK4/MKK5 resulted in impaired SA induction by agrobacteria in Arabidopsis. These results demonstrate that MKK4/MKK5 regulate the agrobacteria induction of SA synthesis during the infection process.
Figure 8. MKK4/MKK5 pathway regulates salicylic acid (SA) synthesis in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. (A) Agrobacteria infection induces SA synthesis gene expression. Ten-day-old seedlings of WT grown in 1/2 MS liquid medium were treated with mock or 2 × 108 cfu/ml GV3101 suspension cells as the indicated time point. Then, total RNA was extracted, and the transcript level was analyzed by qRT-PCR for AtPBS3. (B) The loss of the function of MKK4 and MKK5 compromises AtPBS3 expression in the Agrobacteria inoculation. Total RNA was extracted from 10-day-old WT (Col-0) and mkk4/5 double-mutant seedlings after treatment with agrobacteria. Relative gene expression levels are shown. UBQ10 was used as an internal control. (C) SA contents in WT and mkk4/5 after inoculation with agrobacteria. Ten-day-old WT and mkk4/5 seedlings were treated as Figure 8A, and SA contents were measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). (D) Agrobacterium-mediated transit transformation in an SA-defective mutant (NahG) by using the AGROBEST system. WT (Col-0), NahG mutant 10-day-old seedlings were inoculated with 108 cfu/ml GV3101-pBISN1 suspension cells. GUS staining (left) and MUG assay (right) were measured at 3 dpi. (E) Agrobacterium-mediated stable transformation in NahG by using the tumorigenesis system. Root segments from the WT (Col-0) and NahG mutant were inoculated with 106 cfu/ml of the A. tumefaciens strains A208. Tumors were scored at 30 days after infection. Values represent the average of three replicates with error bars indicating SD of the mean. “**” indicates a significant difference at p < 0.01. The scale bar indicates 5 mm.
As SA synthesis is regulated by MKK4/MKK5 during agrobacteria infection, we next analyzed the effect of exogenous SA on transformation in WT and mkk4/5 double mutants. The results showed that applying SA to WT (Col-0) and mkk4/5 double-mutant seedlings caused the transformation frequency of both the WT (Col-0) and mkk4/5 to decrease relative to plants without SA treatment, with ~1.6- and 1.8-fold decreases, respectively, in GUS activity (Supplementary Figure 5). This result demonstrates that exogenous SA rescues the phenotype of mkk4/5 and greater SA concentration represses agrobacteria infection in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. To obtain more evidence supporting this hypothesis, we examined the transformation of SA-deficient mutant NahG plants (van Wees and Glazebrook, 2003). The results indicated that, at 3 days after inoculation with GV3101-pBISN1, GUS staining was much stronger in NahG seedlings than in WT (Col-0), with a GUS activity increase of 2.9-fold compared with the WT (Col-0) (Figure 8D). Stable transformation via tumorigenesis was also analyzed. WT and NahG root segments were infected with the tumorigenic A. tumefaciens strain A208, and tumorigenesis efficiency was counted. The data show that compared with WT, the NahG mutant exhibited a much more agrobacteria-sensitive phenotype and had more tumors in roots (Figure 8E). From these results, we can conclude that SA accumulation during agrobacteria infection is regulated by MKK4/MKK5 and is involved in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.
MKK4/MKK5 Regulate ET Synthesis in Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation
As an important plant hormone, ET plays a major role in plant defense response to pathogen infection (Wang et al., 2002). MPK3/MPK6 regulate ET biosynthesis during pathogen attack (Han et al., 2010; Li et al., 2012). Agrobacterium has been found to regulate ET metabolism during the transformation process. Levels of the ET precursor ACC (1-amino-cyclopropane-1-carboxylate) were elevated during infection by agrobacteria (Lee et al., 2009). To clarify the roles of MKK4/MKK5 in regulatory pathways during the agrobacteria infection process, we investigated whether ET is involved in this process. Firstly, we measured the gene expression of rate-limiting enzyme of ET biosynthesis ACC synthetase (ACS) during agrobacteria infection. The results show that with agrobacteria inoculation, the ACC biosynthesis genes ACS2, ACS4, and ACS6 were strongly induced compared with the mock treatment. These genes expression levels peaked at 6 hpi and decreased with further time after inoculation (Figures 9A,B; Supplementary Figure 6). This finding indicates that plants increased ET synthesis during agrobacteria infection.
Figure 9. MKK4/MKK5 pathway regulates ethylene (ET) synthesis in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. (A, B) ET synthesis genes kinetic expression in WT during the agrobacteria infection. Ten-day-old seedlings grown in 1/2 MS liquid medium were treated with mock or 2 × 108 cfu/ml GV3101 suspension cells as the indicated time point. Then, total RNA was extracted, and the transcript level was analyzed by qRT-PCR for ACC synthetase 2 (ACS2) (A) and ACS6 (B). (C, D) The loss of the function of MKK4 and MKK5 compromises the expression of ACS genes during the agrobacteria inoculation. Total RNA was extracted from 10-day-old WT (Col-0) and mkk4/5 double mutant seedlings treated as above for 3 h (C) or 24 h (D), respectively. Relative gene expression levels are shown for: (C) ACS2 and (D) ACS6. UBQ10 was used as an internal control. (E) Agrobacterium-mediated transit transformation in an ET-defective mutant by using AGROBEST system. WT (Col-0), acs2/6/4/5/9 mutant 10-day-old seedlings were inoculated with 108 cfu/ml GV3101-pBISN1 suspension cells. GUS staining (left) and MUG assay (right) were measured at 3 dpi. (F) Agrobacterium-mediated stable transformation in ET defective mutant by using the tumorigenesis system. Root segments from the WT (Col-0) and acs2/6/4/5/9 mutant were inoculated with 106 cfu/ml of the A. tumefaciens strains A208. Tumors were scored at 30 days after infection. Values represent the average of three replicates with error bars indicating SD of the mean. “**” indicates a significant difference at p < 0.01. The scale bar indicates 5 mm.
We also detected the expression of ACS genes in mkk4/5 double mutants. The results reveal that ACS2 and ACS4 gene expressions were impaired in mkk4/5 double mutants inoculated with agrobacteria at 3 hpi while ACS6 expression was impaired at 24 hpi (Figures 9C,D; Supplementary Figure 6). No difference in ACS6 expression occurred in the WT (Col-0) mutant or mkk4/5 double mutants at 3 hpi (Supplementary Figure 6), indicating that the regulation of ACS6 gene expression occurs late in the agrobacteria infection process. These results imply that ET synthesis is regulated by MKK4/MKK5 at the ACS gene transcription level in the agrobacteria infection process.
To further explore the relationship between MKK4/MKK5 signaling and ET during Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, we applied exogenous ACC to the WT mutant and mkk4/5 double mutants to determine whether ACC can rescue the transformation phenotype of mkk4/5 double mutants. After treatment with ACC, mkk4/5 double-mutant seedlings exhibited a two-fold decrease in the transformation frequency compared with the mock treatment (Supplementary Figure 6), indicating that the application of the exogenous ET precursor ACC can reverse the increased transformation phenotype of mkk4/5. Notably, ACC also caused the transformation frequency to decrease in the WT (Col-0) (Supplementary Figure 6), indicating that high ET levels had negative effects on the transformation by agrobacteria. To confirm the role of ET in transformation, we checked the transformation phenotype of ET synthesis defective mutant acs2/6/4/5/9. This mutant exhibited very low ET production compared with the WT (Col-0) (Li et al., 2012). Transient transformation frequency evaluation showed that acs2/6/4/5/9 mutant seedlings had a greater GUS staining and 2.1-fold higher GUS activity than WT (Col-0) (Figure 9E). Tumorigenesis was analyzed as described earlier. WT and acs2/6/4/5/9 mutant root segments were infected with the tumorigenic A. tumefaciens strain A208, and tumorigenesis efficiency was measured. The data show that the acs2/6/4/5/9 mutant had more tumors in roots and exhibited a higher transformation frequency than WT (Figure 9F). These results suggest that ET synthesis is regulated by the MKK4/MKK5 signaling pathway and is involved in the transformation by Agrobacterium.
Discussion
Agrobacterium tumefaciens has been widely used in plant transformation for decades, and the biological process of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation has been extensively studied (Gelvin, 2003; Citovsky et al., 2007). However, some aspects of this process, such as the mechanism of plant immunity to agrobacteria, and its roles in transformation remain unclear. In this study, we elucidated the Arabidopsis MKK4/5-MPK3/6 pathway, which regulates transformation by modulating plant immunity to Agrobacterium. As a plant pathogen, Agrobacterium triggers plant immunity characterized by MPK3/MKK6 activation, and defense-responsive gene induction (Figure 1). This process is similar to the responses to other plant pathogens such as Pst DC3000 (Nie and Xu, 2016).
Zipfel et al. (2006) demonstrated that plant immunity affects the process of transformation by Agrobacterium. Thus, plant transformation frequency can be increased in plants by manipulating plant immunity to Agrobacterium. The MKK4/5-MPK3/6 pathway is very important in the plant response defense to the pathogen Pst DC3000 (Nie and Xu, 2016). Here, we focused on MKK4/5-MPK3/6 pathway functions in Agrobacterium-triggered plant immunity and transformation. Our results reveal that the loss of the function of MKK4 and MKK5 compromised plant immunity, including MPK3/MPK6 activation, defense-responsive gene expression, ET synthesis, and SA accumulation. Deficient immunity accompanied a higher transformation frequency by Agrobacterium (Figure 3). Our results demonstrate that plant immunity to Agrobacterium affects transformation and that MKK4/MKK5 is essential for plant immunity signaling to Agrobacterium.
Ethylene and SA are the two plant hormones with very important roles in plant defense. Previous research has demonstrated that MPK3 and MPK6 regulate Botrytis cinerea-induced ET production by modulating ACC synthase at both the transcription and activity levels (Han et al., 2010; Li et al., 2012). Lee et al. (2009) reported that ET and SA accumulate before and after T-DNA integration during Agrobacterium transformation. In this study, we found that MKK4/MKK5 regulate agrobacteria-induced ET and SA biosynthesis (Figures 8, 9). Meanwhile, the exogenous application of ACC or SA can reverse the mkk4/5 double-mutant phenotype (Supplementary Figures 5, 6). Notably, exogenous ACC or SA addition repressed the transformation in WT (Col-0) (Figures 8, 9). This result may indicate that exogenous ACC or SA strengthens the plant defense response or controls the virulence of Agrobacterium. ET production in plants was reported to suppress vir gene expression in agrobacteria during transformation (Nonaka et al., 2008). SA has an inhibitory effect on the virulence of agrobacteria by inhibiting the expression of the vir regulon on the Ti plasmid, which is essential for the transfer and integration of the T-DNA into the host genome (Yuan et al., 2007; Anand et al., 2008). These findings and our data reveal that the host plant is capable of controlling agrobacteria infection by modulating MKK4/MKK5-regulated ET and SA synthesis and defense signaling at an early stage.
Djamei et al. (2007) demonstrated that agrobacteria activate MPK3, which can phosphorylate VirE2 interacting protein 1 (VIP1, a bZIP transcription factor), resulting in the nuclear localization of VIP1 to support the transformation by Agrobacterium. In that study, the phosphorylation of VIP1 by MPK3 was found to be important for the transformation by Agrobacterium, so the authors suggested that agrobacteria hijack the MPK3-targeted VIP1 defense signaling pathway, allowing for the nuclear delivery of the T-DNA complex as a Trojan horse. Our data in this study show that MPK3 and MPK6 act downstream of MKK4/MKK5 to regulate the Arabidopsis defense response to agrobacteria. The loss of the function of MPK3 and MPK6 increased the transformation by Agrobacterium (Figure 5) while the mpk3 single mutant showed no difference from the WT (Col-0) and the mpk6 single mutant exhibited a slight increase in the transformation frequency (Supplementary Figure 2). Our results imply that MPK3 is not essential for transformation. Now, we have to mention the function of VIP1 in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. As a transcription factor, VIP1 regulates plant stress gene expression and forms a ternary complex with VirE2 and importin α (Citovsky et al., 2004; Pitzschke et al., 2009). Tzfira et al. (2001, 2002) demonstrated that tobacco plants expressing an Arabidopsis VIP1 antisense construct were resistant to both transient and stable transformation by Agrobacterium, whereas the overexpression of VIP1 increased plant transformation by Agrobacterium. Based on those results, they concluded that VIP1 plays an important role in transformation. However, a recent study by Shi et al. (2014) using a quantitative Arabidopsis root assay indicated that the manipulation of VIP1 gene expression did not alter the susceptibility of Arabidopsis roots to Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. The authors suggested that VIP1 is not important for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in Arabidopsis. Together, these results imply an unknown function of VIP1 in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. A recent study by Wang et al. (2017) demonstrated that VirE2 interacts with multiple VIP1 homologs in the same host, indicating redundant functions of one or more proteins in the VIP1 subgroup. Our results regarding the MPK3 and MPK6 function in transformation show no difference between the WT and mpk3 mutant (Supplementary Figure 3). We propose that this phenomenon can be readily explained. Firstly, MPK3 may not be the only upstream kinase (e.g., MPK4) that phosphorylates VIP1. Secondly, considering the redundant functions of VIP1 homologs, other proteins may be able to rescue the function of VIP1. Therefore, we interpret our results as not conflicting with those of previous studies.
This study elucidates the plant defense response process of signaling to Agrobacterium, which is mediated by the MKK4/5-MPK3/6 pathway and reveals the contribution of the plant defense response to the transformation frequency by Agrobacterium. Concerted research efforts on host plant defense signaling in response to Agrobacterium will build a strong foundation for modulating the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation process. Such a manipulation may support the development of more efficient transformation procedures for other crops.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are publicly available. This data can be found here: National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) BioProject database under accession number GSE179628.
Author Contributions
KD, TL, and LC designed the research. TL, LC, and JJ performed most of the research all authors contributed to material preparation and data analysis. KD wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the article.
Funding
This research was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31901957).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
We would like to appreciate Dr. Shuqun Zhang (University of Missouri, MO, USA) for providing the materials MPK6SR, MKK4-DD, and mkk4/5 mutant seeds. We thank Dr. Ming Wang for providing technical support of SA detection and Han Chen for RNA-seq data analysis.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.731690/full#supplementary-material
Supplementary Figure 1. The activation of NtMEK2 in Arabidopsis increases the plant immunity and represses the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. (A) NtMEK2-DD induction and MPK3/MPK6 activation in NtMEK2-DD transgenic seedlings. After pretreatment with dexamethasone (DEX), plant total protein was extracted from 10-day-old NtMEK2-DD transgenic seedlings grown in 1/2 Murashige and Skoog (MS) liquid medium. The induction of NtMEK2-DD expression and MPK3/MPK6 activation were detected by the immunoblot analysis using anti-FLAG and anti-pTEpY antibodies, respectively. Equal loading was confirmed by PONCEAU S staining. (B) The induction of expressions of defense genes in NtMEK2-DD transgenic seedlings. After pretreatment with DEX, total RNA was extracted from 10-day-old wild type (WT) (Col-0), NtMEK2-DD transgenic plants. Transcript levels were determined by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) for CRK11 (left) and NHL10 (right). UBQ10 was used as an internal control. (C) The evaluation of transformation frequency in NtMEK2-DD transgenic seedlings compared with WT (Col-0) using the AGROBEST system. Ten-day-old Arabidopsis WT (Col-0), NtMEK2-DD transgenic whole seedlings were infected with 108 cfu/ml GV3101-pBISN1 suspension cells, and transformation frequency was measured by histochemical β-glucuronidase (GUS) staining (left) and 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-glucuronide (MUG) assay (right) at 3-day postinfection (dpi). Values represent the average of three replicates with error bars indicating SD of the mean. “**” indicates a significant difference at p < 0.01. The scale bar indicates 5 mm.
Supplementary Figure 2. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in the mpk3 and mpk6 single mutant. Agrobacterium-mediated transit transformation by using the AGROBEST system. WT (Col-0), 10-day-old seedlings of mpk3-1 and mpk6-2 mutants were inoculated with 108 cfu/ml GV3101-pBISN1 suspension cells. GUS staining (left) and MUG assay (right) were measured at 3 dpi. Values represent the average of three replicates with error bars indicating SD of the mean. The scale bar indicates 5 mm.
Supplementary Figure 3. Global transcriptome indicates that agrobacteria trigger plant defense pathways. Gene ontology (GO) biological process categories in WT induced by agrobacteria treatment. Sets of genes used to determine significantly enriched GO terms were those found to be differentially expressed at p < 0.05 significance level and showed at least a two-fold change in expression. The included categories are those found to be significantly enriched (p < 0.01) among the upregulated gene in agrobacteria treatment.
Supplementary Figure 4. Agrobacteria-triggered plant defense pathways are dependent on MKK4/MKK5. GO biological process categories are induced by agrobacteria in WT while no changes in mkk4/5 double-mutant plants.
Supplementary Figure 5. Salicylic acid (SA) reverses the mkk4/5 phenotype of transformation. (A) SA synthesis gene expression in WT after agrobacteria infection. Ten-day-old seedlings grown in 1/2 MS liquid medium were treated with mock or 2 × 108 cfu/ml GV3101 suspension cells as the indicated time point. Then, total RNA was extracted, and the transcript level was analyzed by qRT-PCR for AtICS1 (left) and AtEDS5 (right). (B) Exogenous application of SA reversed the increased transformation phenotype of the mkk4/5 double mutant. Ten-day-old WT (Col-0) and mkk4/5 double-mutant seedlings grown in 1/2 liquid MS medium were pretreated with SA (10 μM) for overnight and then were infected with 108 cfu/ml GV3101-pBISN1 cells. GUS staining (left) and MUG assay (right) were measured at 3-day post-infiltration. Values represent the average of three replicates with error bars indicating SD of the mean. “**” indicates a significant difference at p < 0.01. The scale bar indicates 5 mm.
Supplementary Figure 6. 1-Amino-cyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) reverses the mkk4/5 phenotype of transformation. (A) ACS4 gene expression in WT and mkk4/5 double mutants during agrobacteria infection. Ten-day-old seedlings grown in 1/2 MS liquid medium were treated with mock or 2 × 108 cfu/ml GV3101 suspension cells as the indicated time point. Then, total RNA was extracted, and the transcript level was analyzed by qRT-PCR. (B) ACS6 gene expression in WT and mkk4/5 double mutants after 3 h post-agrobacteria infection. (C) Exogenous application of ACC reversed the increased transformation of mkk4/5 double mutants. Ten-day-old WT (Col-0) and mkk4/5 double-mutant seedlings grown in 1/2 liquid MS medium were pretreated with ACC (10 μM) for overnight and then were infected with 108 cfu/ml GV3101-pBISN1 cells. GUS staining (left) and MUG assay (right) were measured at 3-day post-infiltration. Values represent the average of three replicates with error bars indicating SD of the mean. “**” indicates a significant difference at p < 0.01. The scale bar indicates 5 mm.
Supplementary Materials 1 and 2. Agrobacteria-responsive genes (ARGs) in Col-0 and mkk4/5 mutant from RNA-seq data for GO enrichment analysis.
Supplementary Table 1. Primers used in this study.
References
Anand, A., Uppalapati, S. R., Ryu, C. M., Allen, S. N., Kang, L., Tang, Y., et al. (2008). Salicylic acid and systemic acquired resistance play a role in attenuating crown gall disease caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Physiol. 146, 703–715. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.111302
Aoyama, T., and Chua, N. H. (1997). A glucocorticoid-mediated transcriptional induction system in transgenic plants. Plant J. 11, 605–612. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1997.11030605.x
Asai, T., Tena, G., Plotnikova, J., Willmann, M. R., Chiu, W. L., Gomez-Gomez, L., et al. (2002). MAP kinase signaling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Nature 415, 977–983. doi: 10.1038/415977a
Azpiroz-Leehan, R., and Feldmann, K. A. (1997). T-DNA insertion mutagenesis in Arabidopsis: going back and forth. Trends Genet. 13, 152–156. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525(97)01094-9
Brodersen, P., Petersen, M., Nielsen, H. B., Zhu, S., Newman, M. A., Shokat, K. M., et al. (2006). Arabidopsis MAP kinase 4 regulates salicylic acid and jasmonic acid/ethylene- dependent responses via EDS1 and PAD4. Plant J. 47, 532–546. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02806.x
Citovsky, V., Kapelnikov, A., Oliel, S., Zakai, N., Rojas, M. R., Gilbertson, R. L., et al. (2004). Protein interactions involved in nuclear import of the Agrobacterium VirE2 protein in vivo and in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 29528–29533. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M403159200
Citovsky, V., Kozlovsky, S. V., Lacroix, B., Zaltsman, A., Dafny-Yelin, M., Vyas, S., et al. (2007). Biological systems of the host cell involved in Agrobacterium infection. Cell. Microbiol. 9, 9–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00830.x
Colcombet, J., and Hirt, H. (2008). Arabidopsis MAPKs: a complex signaling network involved in multiple biological processes. Biochem. J. 413, 217–226. doi: 10.1042/BJ20080625
Desikan, R., Hancock, J. T., Ichimura, K., Shinozaki, K., and Neill, S. J. (2001). Harpin induces activation of the Arabidopsis mitogen-activated protein kinases AtMPK4 and AtMPK6. Plant Physiol. 126, 1579–1587. doi: 10.1104/pp.126.4.1579
Ditt, F., Kerr, K. F., de Figueiredo, P., Delrow, J., Comai, L., and Nester, E. W. (2006). The Arabidopsis thaliana transcriptome in response to Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 19, 665–681. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-19-0665
Ditt, R. F., Nester, E. W., and Comai, L. (2001). Plant gene expression response to Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 10954–10959. doi: 10.1073/pnas.191383498
Djamei, A., Pitzschke, A., Nakagami, H., Rajh, I., and Hirt, H. (2007). Trojan horse strategy in Agrobacterium transformation: abusing MAPK defense signaling. Science 318, 453–456 doi: 10.1126/science.1148110
Droillard, M. J., Boudsocq, M., Barbier-Brygoo, H., and Lauriere, C. (2004). Involvement of MPK4 in osmotic stress response pathways in cell suspensions and plantlets of Arabidopsis thaliana: activation by hypoosmolarity and negative role in hyperosmolarity tolerance. FEBS Lett. 574, 42–48. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.08.001
Duan, K., Willig, C., de Tar, J. R., Spollen, W. G., and Zhang, Z. (2018). Transcriptomic analysis of Arabidopsis seedlings in response to Agrobacterium-mediated transformation process. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 31, 445–459. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-10-17-0249-R
Escobar, M. A., and Dandekar, A. M. (2003). Agrobacterium tumefaciens as an agent of disease. Trends Plant Sci. 8, 380–386. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(03)00162-6
Ezura, H., Yuhashi, K. I., Yasuta, T., and Minamisawa, K. (2000). Effect of ethylene on Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated gene transfer to melon. Plant Breed. 119, 75–79. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0523.2000.00438.x
Gao, M., Liu, J., Bi, D., Zhang, Z., Cheng, F., Chen, S., et al. (2008). MEKK1, MKK1/MKK2 and MPK4 function together in a mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade to regulate innate immunity in plants. Cell Res. 18, 1190–1198. doi: 10.1038/cr.2008.300
Gelvin, S. B. (2003). Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation: The biology behind the “gene-jockeying” tool. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 67, 16–37. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.67.1.16-37.2003
Gelvin, S. B. (2017). Integration of Agrobacterium T-DNA into the Plant Genome. Annu. Rev. Genet., 51, 195–217. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-120215-035320
Geno, B., Lang, J., Berriri, S., Garmier, M., Gilard, F., Pateyron, S., et al. (2017). Constitutively Active Arabidopsis MAP Kinase 3 triggers defense responses involving salicylic acid and SUMM2 resistance protein. Plant Physiol. 174, 1238–1249. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00378
Gomez-Gomez, L., Felix, G., and Boller, T. (1999). A single locus determines sensitivity to bacterial flagellin in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 18, 277–284. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00451.x
Hammond-Kosack, K. E., and Jones, J. D. (1996). Resistance gene-dependent plant defense responses. Plant Cell 8, 1773–1791. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.10.1773
Han, L., Li, G. J., Yang, K. Y., Mao, G., Wang, R., Liu, Y., et al. (2010). Mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 and 6 regulate Botrytis cinerea-induced ethylene production in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 64, 114–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04318.x
Jefferson, R. A., Kavanagh, T. A., and Bevan, M. W. (1987). GUS fusions: beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J. 6, 3901–3907. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02730.x
Kim, D., Paggi, J. M., Park, C., Bennett, C., and Salzberg, S. L. (2019). Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 907–915 doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4
Lee, C. W., Efetova, M., Engelmann, J. C., Kramell, R., Wasternack, C., Ludwig-Müller, J., et al. (2009). Agrobacterium tumefaciens promotes tumor induction by modulating pathogen defense in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 21, 2948–2962. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.064576
Li, G., Meng, X., Wang, R., Mao, G., Han, L., Liu, Y., et al. (2012). Dual-level regulation of ACC synthase activity by MPK3/MPK6 cascade and its downstream WRKY transcription factor during ethylene induction in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002767
Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., et al. (2009). The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K., and Shi, W. (2014). FeatureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923–930. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656
Meng, X., and Zhang, S. (2013). MAPK cascades in plant disease resistance signaling. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 51, 245–266. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102314
Nam, J., Matthysse, A. G., and Gelvin, S. B. (1997). Differences in susceptibility of Arabidopsis ecotypes to crown gall disease may result from a deficiency in T-DNA integration. Plant Cell 9, 317–333. doi: 10.1105/tpc.9.3.317
Nie, S., and Xu, H. (2016). Riboflavin-Induced Disease Resistance Requires the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases 3 and 6 in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 11:e0153175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153175
Nimchuk, Z., Eulgem, T., Holt, B. F., and Dang, J. L. (2003). Recognition and response in the plant immune system. Annu. Rev. Genet. 37, 579–609. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.142628
Nonaka, S., Yuhashi, K., Takada, K., Sugaware, M., Minamisawa, K., and Ezura, H. (2008). Ethylene production in plants during transformation suppresses vir gene expression in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. New Phytol. 178, 647–656. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02400.x
Pfund, C., Tans-Kersten, J., Dunning, F. M., Alonso, J. M., Ecker, J. R., Allen, C., et al. (2004). Flagellin is not a major defense elicitor in Ralstonia solanacearum cells or extracts applied to Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 17, 696–706. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.6.696
Pitzschke, A., Djamei, A., Teige, M., and Hirt, H. (2009). VIP1 response elements mediate mitogen-activated protein kinase 3-induced stress gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 18414–18419. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905599106
Qiu, J. L., Zhou, L., Yun, B. W., Nielsen, H. B., Fiil, B. K., Petersen, K., et al. (2008). Arabidopsis mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases MKK1 and MKK2 have overlapping functions in defense signaling mediated by MEKK1, MPK4, and MKS1. Plant Physiol. 148, 212–222. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.120006
Rekhter, D., Lüdke, D., Ding, Y., Feussner, K., Zienkiewicz, K., Lipka, V., et al. (2019). Isochorismate-derived biosynthesis of the plant stress hormone salicylic acid. Science. 365, 498–502. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw1720
Ren, D., Yang, H., and Zhang, S. (2002). Cell death mediated by MAPK is associated with hydrogen peroxide production in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 559–565. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109495200
Shao, Y., Yu, X., Xu, X., Li, Y., Yuan, W., Xu, Y., et al. (2020). The YDA-MKK4/MKK5-MPK3/MPK6 cascade functions downstream of the RGF1-RGI ligand-receptor pair in regulating mitotic activity in the root apical meristem. Mol. Plant 13, 1608–1623 doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.09.004
Shi, Y., Lee, L. Y., and Gelvin, S. B. (2014). Is VIP1 important for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation? Plant J. 79, 848–860. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12596
Smith, E. F., and Townsend, C. O. (1907). A plant-tumor of bacterial origin. Science 25, 671–673. doi: 10.1126/science.25.643.671
Su, J., Zhang, M., Zhang, L., Sun, T., Liu, Y., Lukowitz, W., et al. (2017). Regulation of stomatal immunity by interdependent functions of a pathogen-responsive MPK3/MPK6 cascade and abscisic acid. Plant Cell 29, 526–542. doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00577
Sun, T., Nitta, Y., Zhang, Q., Wu, D., Tian, H., Lee, J. S., et al. (2018). Antagonistic interactions between two MAP kinase cascades in plant development and immune signaling. EMBO Rep. 19:e45324. doi: 10.15252/embr.201745324
Tenea, G. N., Spantzel, J., Lee, L. Y., Zhu, Y., Lin, K., Johnson, S. J., et al. (2009). Overexpression of several Arabidopsis histone genes increases Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and transgene expression in plants. Plant Cell 21, 3350–3367. doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.070607
Thordal-Christensen, H., Zhang, Z., Wei, Y., and Collinge, B. D. (1997). Subcellular localization of H2O2 in Plants. H2O2 accumulation in papillae and hypersensitive response during the barley-powdery mildew interaction. Plant J. 11, 1187–1194. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1997.11061187.x
Torrens-Spence, M. P., Bobokalonova, A., Carballo, V., Glinkerman, C. M., Pluskal, T., Shen, A., et al. (2019). PBS3 and EPS1 Complete Salicylic Acid Biosynthesis from Isochorismate in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 12, 1577–1586. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2019.11.005
Tzfira, T., Vaidya, M., and Citovsky, V. (2001). VIP1, an Arabidopsis protein that interacts with Agrobacterium VirE2, is involved in VirE2 nuclear import and Agrobacterium infectivity. EMBO J. 20, 3596–3607. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.13.3596
Tzfira, T., Vaidya, M., and Citovsky, V. (2002). Increasing plant susceptibility to Agrobacterium infection by over-expression of the Arabidopsis nuclear protein VIP1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 10435–10440. doi: 10.1073/pnas.162304099
van Wees, S., and Glazebrook, J. (2003). Loss of non-host resistance of Arabidopsis NahG to Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola is due to degradation products of salicylic acid. Plant J. 33, 733–742. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01665.x
Veena Jiang, H., Doerge, R. W., and Gelvin, S. B. (2003). Transfer of T-DNA and Vir proteins to plant cells by Agrobacterium tumefaciens induces expression of host genes involved in mediating transformation and suppresses host defense gene expression. Plant J. 35, 219–236. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01796.x
Vlot, A. C., Dempsey, D. A., and Klessig, D. F. (2009). Salicylic acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 47, 177–206 doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.050908.135202
Wang, K. L., Li, H., and Ecker, J. R. (2002). Ethylene biosynthesis and signaling networks. Plant Cell 14, S131–S151 doi: 10.1105/tpc.001768
Wang, L., Lacroix, B., Guo, J., and Citovsky, V. (2017). The Agrobacterium VirE2 effector interacts with multiple members of the Arabidopsis VIP1 protein family. Mol. Plant Pathol. 12, 1172–1183. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12595
Wang, H., Ngwenyama, N., Liu, Y., Walker, J. C., and Zhang, S. (2007). Stomatal development and patterning are regulated by environmentally responsive mitogen-activated protein kinases in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19, 63–73. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.048298
Wroblewski, T., Tomczal, A., and Michelmore, R. W. (2005). Optimization of Agrobacterium-mediated transient assays of gene expression in lettuce, tomato and Arabidopsis. Plant Biotechnol. J. 3, 259–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2005.00123.x
Wu, H. Y., Liu, K. H., Wang, Y. C., Wu, J. F., Chiu, W. L., Chen, C. Y., et al. (2014). AGROBEST: an efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression method for versatile gene function analyses in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Methods 10:19. doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-10-19
Xu, J., Xie, J., Yan, C., Zou, X., Ren, D., and Zhang, S. (2014). A chemical genetic approach demonstrates that MPK3/MPK6 activation and NADPH oxidase-mediated oxidative burst are two independent signaling events in plant immunity. Plant J. 77, 222–234. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12382
Xu, J., and Zhang, S. (2015). Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in signaling plant growth and development. Trends Plant Sci. 20, 56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.10.001
Yang, K. Y., Liu, Y., and Zhang, S. (2001). Activation of a mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway is involved in disease resistance in tobacco. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 741–746. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.2.741
Yuan, Z. C., Edlind, M. P., Liu, P., Saenkham, P., Banta, L. M., Wise, A. A., et al. (2007). The plant signal salicylic acid shuts down expression of the vir regulon and activates quormone-quenching genes in Agrobacterium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 11790–11795. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704866104
Zhang, S., and Klessig, D. F. (2001). MAPK cascades in plant defense signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 6, 520–527. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(01)02103-3
Zhao, C., Nie, H., Shen, Q., Zhang, S., Lukowitz, W., and Tang, D. (2014). EDR1 physically interacts with MKK4/MKK5 and negatively regulates a MAP kinase cascade to modulate plant innate immunity. PLoS Genet. 10:e1004389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004389
Keywords: Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, MKK4/MKK5, MPK3/MPK6, plant immunity, Arabidopsis
Citation: Liu T, Cao L, Cheng Y, Ji J, Wei Y, Wang C and Duan K (2021) MKK4/5-MPK3/6 Cascade Regulates Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation by Modulating Plant Immunity in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 12:731690. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.731690
Received: 28 June 2021; Accepted: 01 September 2021;
Published: 30 September 2021.
Edited by:
Yi-Ju Lu, Michigan State University, United StatesReviewed by:
Benoit Lacroix, Stony Brook University, United StatesWenli Chen, South China Normal University, China
Satoko Nonaka, University of Tsukuba, Japan
Copyright © 2021 Liu, Cao, Cheng, Ji, Wei, Wang and Duan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kaixuan Duan, ZHVhbmsmI3gwMDA0MDtuamF1LmVkdS5jbg==
†These authors have contributed equally to this work