Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 10 February 2021
Sec. Plant Abiotic Stress

Regulation of Photosystem II Heterogeneity and Photochemistry in Two Cultivars of C4 Crop Sugarcane Under Chilling Stress

  • 1State Key Laboratory of Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bio-resources, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Conservation, College of Forestry, Guangxi University, Guangxi, China
  • 2School of Life Sciences, Devi Ahilya University, Indore, India
  • 3Adaptive Cropping Systems Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture-AgriculturalResearch Service (USDA-ARS), Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Beltsville, MD, United States
  • 4Department of Agricultural Botany, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
  • 5School of Biotechnology, Devi Ahilya University, Indore, India

In subtropical regions, chilling stress is one of the major constraints for sugarcane cultivation, which hampers yield and sugar production. Two recently released sugarcane cultivars, moderately chilling tolerant Guitang 49 and chilling tolerant Guitang 28, were selected. The experiments were conducted in the controlled environment, and seedlings were exposed to optimum (25°C/15°C), chilling (10°C/5°C), and recovery (25°C/15°C) temperature conditions. PSII heterogeneity was studied in terms of reducing side and antenna size heterogeneity. Under chilling, reducing side heterogeneity resulted in increased number of QB non-reducing centers, whereas antenna side heterogeneity resulted in enhanced number of inactive β centers in both cultivars, but the magnitude of change was higher in Guitang 49 than Guitang 28. Furthermore, in both cultivars, quantum efficiency of PSII, status of water splitting complex, and performance index were adversely affected by chilling, along with reduction in net photosynthesis rate and nighttime respiration and alterations in leaf optical properties. The extents of negative effect on these parameters were larger in Guitang 49 than in Guitang 28. These results reveal a clear differentiation in PSII heterogeneity between differentially chilling tolerant cultivars. Based on our studies, it is concluded that PSII heterogeneity can be used as an additional non-invasive and novel technique for evaluating any type of environmental stress in plants.

Introduction

Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.), a major C4 crop, is mainly cultivated in tropical and subtropical regions. It is an economically important crop having versatile uses, such as fodder, production of sugar, biofuel, paper, alcohol, etc. The highest sugar yield in sugarcane required mean optimum growth temperature between 25 and 30°C, whereas mean suboptimum growth temperature is <12°C–15°C, which causes reduction in growth rate, sugar yield, and biomass production (Ebrahim et al., 1998; Li and Yang, 2015; Li et al., 2015). Countries located in marginal tropical and subtropical regions face severe damage to sugarcane cultivation due to seasonal chilling temperature incidences (Selvarajan et al., 2018). For instance, China is in the third position among the top 10 sugarcane-producing countries with an annual sugarcane production of 104 mt (FAO, 2017). China encountered a chilling temperature incident during the year 2008, which caused 68% crop (sugarcane) loss in Guangxi province alone (Li and Yang, 2015; Li et al., 2015). On a global scale, occurrences of such deleterious chilling temperature incidents are predicted to be more frequent in the near future, due to climate change (IPCC, 2013).

Like other abiotic stress factors, chilling temperature mainly affects photosynthesis of plants and consequently causes reduced growth and yield (Sunoj et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2019). Previous studies have also reported that chilling temperature in marginal, tropical, and subtropical regions negatively affected photosynthesis of tropical plant species (Elsheery et al., 2008; Huang et al., 2010). Chilling temperature primarily has negative impact on electron transport between photosystems (PSII and PSI), carbohydrate metabolism-related enzymes [Rubisco, Rubisco activase, fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase), and sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphatase (SBPase)], photorespiration, and stomatal response, which are different components related to photosynthesis. The impact of chilling temperature on any of the above components can result in photoinhibition of PSII and eventually affect functioning of PSI (Allen et al., 2000; Allen and Ort, 2001; Kadota et al., 2019).

The stability of photosystems under stress conditions is important to maintain the efficiency of light reaction and thereby proper functioning of dark reaction or vice versa. Among the photosystems, PSII is more sensitive to chilling temperature than PSI (Huang et al., 2010). Chlorophyll (Chl) a fluorescence can provide information about the functional status of PSII and is widely used for the study of impact of abiotic stresses in plants (Strasser et al., 2004; Sunoj et al., 2017; Mathur et al., 2019). Chl a fluorescence is not only used for investigating Chl transient curves but also used for studying PSII heterogeneity (Mathur et al., 2011). On the basis of functional and structural pattern, PSII heterogeneity is of two types, i.e., antenna size heterogeneity and reducing side heterogeneity (Anderson and Melis, 1983; Mathur and Jajoo, 2020). PSII antenna heterogeneity involves three types of reaction centers: α, β, and γ (Hsu et al., 1989). The dominant form, PSII α, is localized in the grana partition regions (Anderson and Melis, 1983) and is responsible for the majority of the water oxidation activity and plastoquinone reduction. These centers possess a Chl a core complex, an accessory Chl ab light-harvesting inner antenna (LHC II-inner), and a peripheral antenna (LHC II-peripheral) containing a combined total of approximately 210–250 Chl a and Chl b molecules. PSII α is subpopulation of dimeric PSII. However, PSII β and γ subpopulations are found to be present in non-appressed region of thylakoid membranes and are considered as slow PSII centers (Anderson and Melis, 1983).

Another form of PSII heterogeneity is known as reducing side heterogeneity, which comprises reducing and non-reducing centers (Lavergne, 1982; Mathur et al., 2011). Some PSII centers are photochemically efficient but are unable to transfer electrons efficiently from electron acceptor QA to secondary electron acceptor QB. These centers are termed as PSII QB-non-reducing centers. In these centers, QA can be reoxidized by a back reaction with the donor side of PSII (Guenther et al., 1988). QB-non-reducing differs from QB-reducing center as these are incapable of reducing the PQ pool. PSII heterogeneity is one of the important strategies in plants to overcome various types of abiotic stresses such as high temperature and osmotic stresses (Mathur et al., 2011; Tomar et al., 2012). Under stress conditions, variation in antenna size and reducing side heterogeneity of PSII has been observed. PSII does this by altering the numbers of active and inactive reaction centers. The inactive reaction centers increase under stress conditions, and they revert back to active reaction centers when the stress is over. The changes in PSII heterogeneity have been found to be mostly reversible; however, under stress conditions such as extreme high temperature or salinity, the changes in PSII heterogeneity become irreversible, indicating the extreme severity of the stress (Mathur et al., 2011).

Guangxi province in China has major contribution to China’s sugar production, and chilling temperature incidences have led to great loss on economic status of sugarcane farmers as well as related industries in this province. Better understanding of the role of PSII heterogeneity can open windows for improving screening strategies for identifying the chilling tolerant sugarcane genotypes. Studies have been conducted to evaluate the impact of chilling stress on sugarcane, but an analysis of alterations in PSII heterogeneity on recently released popular cultivars of sugarcane under chilling stress has not been performed. Until now, most of the studies on PSII heterogeneity have been conducted on C3 crops and rarely on C4 crops (Mathur and Jajoo, 2020). This study aims to evaluate the role of PSII heterogeneity on two recently released cultivar of sugarcane a C4 crop, under chilling stress. C3 and C4 plants have different strategies to cope up with stress conditions. With this study, we want to establish the significance of measurement of PSII heterogeneity in C4 plants too.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials and Growth Condition

The experiments were carried out in March 2019 using controlled environmental facility established at Guangxi University, Nanning, China (22.83°N, 108.28°E). Newly released, moderately chilling tolerant cultivar Guitang 49 and chilling tolerant cultivar Guitang 28 of sugarcane were selected to study the effect of chilling temperature on PSII heterogeneity, Chl a fluorescence, gas exchange (daytime photosynthesis and nighttime respiration), Chl index, and leaf optical properties. Both cultivars were developed by Guangxi Sugarcane Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China. Plants were grown in pots with a dimension of width 33 cm × height 30 cm in greenhouse. After planting, the seedlings were allowed to grow for 75 days in greenhouse under ambient condition before shifting to growth chambers. Soil was used as a growing medium. Soil contents were as follows: organic matter = 19.65 g/kg, total N = 0.10%, total P = 0.04%, total K = 0.62%, hydrolytic N = 86 mg/g, available P = 4.7 mg/kg, available K = 74 mg/kg, soil pH = 5.7. Throughout the experiment period, seedlings were watered until the pot capacity to maintain the equal level of soil moisture. To maintain adequate nutrient status of soil, nitrogen (N; 70 mg/kg soil), potassium (K; 50 mg/kg soil), and phosphorus (P; 100 mg/kg soil) were applied to the soil, and Hogland’s solution (150 mL/pot) was applied once in 2 weeks (Hoagland and Arnon, 1950). During this period, seedlings were irrigated, fertilized, and managed to avoid pest and insects by following commercial cultivation practices. After germination, 1 g of systemic insecticide Marathon (1% imidacloprid, 1-[(6-chloro-3-pyridinyl) methyl]-N-nitro-2-imidazolidin-mine; OHP Inc., Mainland, PA, United States) was applied to each pot to avoid incidence of sucking pest.

After 75 days, seedlings at late tillering phase were transferred to a walk-in growth chamber (Conviron Model CMP 6050; Winnipeg, MB, Canada). The optimum day/night temperatures inside growth chamber were maintained at 25°C/15°C (Li and Yang, 2015; Li et al., 2015), relative humidity (RH) of 60%, and 12 h of photoperiod (6:00 am–6:00 pm) with photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) of 500 μmol m–2 s–1 at the plant canopy level using cool fluorescent lamps. Temperature, humidity, and light were maintained by inbuilt automated monitoring and controlling system of growth chamber. Except day/night temperatures, RH and PAR were maintained at the same level until the end of experimental period. A transition time of 5 h from day to night and vice versa was followed to replicate the diurnal temperature fluctuation under natural conditions. The seedlings were allowed to acclimate for 3 days under the optimum temperature condition. On 3 day of exposure to optimum temperature, all the physiological parameters were measured for Guitang 49 and Guitang 28. After this, the day/night temperature inside growth chamber was decreased to 10°C/5°C, and seedlings were allowed to expose to chilling temperature for 3 days, and measurements were done to record the changes in response to chilling treatment. After studying chilling stress, for recovery of seedlings, growth chamber temperature was set back to the optimum day/night temperatures and allowed seedlings to recover from the impact of chilling stress for 3 days.

Chl a Fluorescence

Chl a fluorescence was measured using the Plant Efficiency Analyser (Handy PEA; Hansatech, Norfolk, England). Measurements were recorded from the middle part of the well-developed and completely opened leaves after 30 min of dark adaptation. The light was provided by light emitting diode array of 650 nm focused onto the leaf to provide homogeneous irradiance over the exposed area (d = 4 mm). A pulse (for 1 s) of illumination with 3,000 μmol (photon) m–1 s–1 was applied to the leaf to generate maximal fluorescence (Fm for all the treatments). Ten to 25 measurements were recorded from each treatment. The efficiency of water splitting and oxygen evolving complex is determined by Fv/Fo and Vk/Vj, where Vk = (F300 μ s - Fo)/(Fm - Fo); Vj = (F2 ms - Fo)/Fm - Fo) (Brestic et al., 2012). Fo represents the minimum fluorescence, when all PSII RCs are open, fluorescence intensity at 50 μs. RC/ABS represents density of active reaction centers per Chl molecule and/or QA reducing RCs per PSII antenna Chl (Brestic et al., 2012). The multiplicative parameters used to obtain performance index [PI(total)] was directly measured from PEA. The PI(total) is an overall parameter calculated for conservation the energy of absorbed by PSII photons until the reduction of PSI end acceptors. The parameters are the density of reaction centers (RC/ABS); the parameter [ΦPo/(1-ΦPo)], where ΦPo represents the maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry; the parameter [ψEo/(1-ψEo)], where ψEo represents the efficiency with which an electron moves into the electron transport chain further than QA; the parameter (δRo/(1-δRo), where δRo represents the efficiency with which an electron from the intersystem electron carriers is transferred to reduce end electron acceptors at the PSI (Photosystem I) acceptor side. 1-Vj represents the probability (at time 0) that a trapped exciton moves an electron into the electron transport chain beyond QA (Strasser et al., 2004; Brestic et al., 2012).

PSII Heterogeneity

Reducing Side Heterogeneity

QB-reducing and QB-non-reducing centers were calculated using double hit (pulse) method as mentioned in Strasser and Tsimilli-Michael (1998) and Mathur et al. (2011). In this method, two fluorescence transients were induced by two subsequent pulses (each of 1-s duration). The first pulse was conducted after a dark period long enough to ensure the reopening of all reaction centers, followed by a second pulse. The duration of the dark interval between two hits was 500 ms. QB-non-reducing centers were calculated by the following equation:

Vo(Bo) = [(Fv/Fm)(Fv/Fm)]/(Fv/Fm)

where Bo = relative amount of QB-non-reducing PSII centers.

Antenna Heterogeneity

Antenna size heterogeneity was measured using DCMU [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea], poisoning method. The detached leaves were put in DCMU solution overnight in complete darkness [DCMU concentration was 200 μM (Toth et al., 2005), and the solution contained 1% ethanol, which was used to dissolve the DCMU]. The leaves were removed from the DCMU solution (in darkness), wiped, and left in the air for ∼1 h to avoid possible effects of anaerobiosis. Antenna size heterogeneity was calculated in terms of percentage of PSII α, β, and γ centers as per Hsu et al. (1989) and Mathur et al. (2011). α, β, and γ centers were calculated from the complementary area growth curve (Melis and Homann, 1976). It involved the calculation of growth of normalized complementary area, defined by the fluorescence induction curve and the line parallel with the maximum level of fluorescence (Fm), with time. Kinetics of complementary area of the dark-adapted sample was fitted with three exponentials phases (corresponding to α, β, and γ).

Leaf Optical Properties and Chl Index

Leaf optical properties (light reflectance, transmittance, and absorptance) were measured between 11:00 am and 12:00 pm using a miniature leaf spectrometer (CI-710; Camas, WA, United States). Chl index was measured using Chl meter (SPAD-502 Plus; Konica Minolta Inc., Japan).

Leaf Gas Exchange

Leaf gas exchange parameters such as net photosynthesis rate (PN), stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration (E), intercellular CO2 (Ci), and nighttime respiration were recorded using a portable photosynthesis system (Li-6400XT; LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, United States). The apparent carboxylation capacity (CE) was calculated from the ratio of PN to Ci (Rymbai et al., 2014).

From each temperature condition and cultivar, a minimum of nine photosynthesis and night respiration measurements were recorded from the middle part of the selected leaves between 10:00 and 11:00 am [after >4 h of exposure to light (PAR of 500 μmol m–2 s–1)] and 10:00 and 11:00 pm (after >4 h of exposure to dark), respectively. While measuring photosynthesis, PAR was set to 500 μmol m–2 s–1 inside the leaf chamber of portable photosynthesis system, and zero PAR was set for night respiration. At the same time, CO2 concentration was set to 400 μmol mol–1 in the leaf chamber, which was common for measuring photosynthesis and night respiration. The block temperature of leaf chamber was adjusted to respective set temperature condition inside growth chamber. The flow rate for photosynthesis measurement was 500 μmol s–1 and was adjusted to 100 μmol s–1 for measuring night respiration to minimize fluctuations (Li-6400XT; Portable Photosynthesis System; Version 6; LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, United States; Sunoj et al., 2016). While measuring night respiration, adequate attention was taken to avoid exposure seedlings to PAR from any external sources and previous to measuring night respiration, it was further confirmed by measuring the light with quantum sensor on leaf chamber of portable photosynthesis system.

Statistical and Data Analysis

Six biological replications per cultivar were used to record different traits under different temperature conditions. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using generalized linear model in SPSS (version 16; SPSS Inc., United States) to test the significance of differences in all measured parameters of cultivars under different temperature conditions. The mean values of each cultivar under different temperature conditions were compared using Duncan multiple-range test (DMRT), whereas mean values of both cultivars under individual temperature condition were compared using Student t-test. Data and graphs and for Chl a fluorescence and PSII heterogeneity were statistically analyzed using GraphPad Prism 5.01 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, United States) and Origin Pro8. To deduce information from the O-J-I-P transients, normalizations and computations were performed using the Biolyzer 4HP software, and Origin Pro8 was used for graphical presentation.

Results and Discussion

Significant difference was observed in both cultivars for all the studied parameters such as PSII heterogeneity, Chl a fluorescence transient parameters, and gas exchange traits for optimum temperature, chilling stress and for recovery as well. Results showed that moderately chilling tolerant Guitang 49 showed slow recovery as compared to tolerant Guitang 28.

Effect of Chilling Stress on Chl a Fluorescence

In OJIP transients (Figure 1), a distinct decline in J-P phase was obtained after chilling in both cultivars, but decline was prominent in Guitang 49. In Guitang 49, a decline in J-P phase was observed, indicating inhibition of electron transport through plastoquinone pool, while P phase was present in Guitang 28 (Figure 1A). The decline in J-P phase in Guitange 49 is clearly evident in the double-normalized figure (Figure 1B). Under chilling stress, quantum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) decreased drastically in Guitang 49, indicating a decline in primary photochemistry (Table 1). Chilling stress decreased Fm and increased Fo (minimal fluorescence) (Table 1), which ultimately decreased Fv/Fm ratio. An increase in Fo may be probably because of the disconnection of PSII light-harvesting antennae from the PSII core complex (Brestic et al., 2012) due to chilling stress. A decline in maximal fluorescence was observed, which represented damage at the donor side of PSII (Table 1). Further, to confirm whether chilling stress had affected OEC and donor side of PSII, Vk/Vj was calculated for both cultivars (Table 1). The ratio of Vk/Vj decreased (Table 1) under chilling stress. The decline in Vk/Vj values suggested either a decrease in functional antenna size (Yusuf et al., 2010) or OEC inactivation (Kalachanis and Manetas, 2010; Brestic et al., 2012) due to chilling stress in both cultivars. The values for Vk/Vj were largely recovered in both cultivars. Furthermore, as a consequence of chilling stress, the electrons accumulated around plastoquinone (PQ) pool increasing the pool size but were unable to move electrons beyond QA and QB due to chilling stress (also indicted in later part of the manuscript), therefore causing a decrease in maximal fluorescence. This was also supported by a change in 1-Vj values. The ratios for 1-Vj decreased (Table 1), suggesting that chilling stress effects were observed not only on the donor side but also on the acceptor side of PSII (Brestic et al., 2012).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Changes in chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters in sugarcane cultivars under different temperature conditions [25°C/15°C (OT; day/night optimum temperature); 10°C/5°C (CT; after 3 days’ exposure of day/night chilling temperature); and 25°C/15°C (RT; recovery at 3 days after experiencing day/night chilling temperature)].

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. (A) Chlorophyll a fluorescence transient curves. (B) Double normalized chlorophyll a transient curve in sugarcane cultivars, under optimal, chilling, and recovery temperature conditions, 25°C/15°C (day/night optimum temperature), 10°C/5°C (after 3 days’ exposure of day/night chilling temperature), and 25°C/15°C (recovery at 3 days after experiencing day/night chilling temperature, respectively. MT, moderately tolerant cultivar (Guitang 49); T, tolerant cultivar (Guitang 28). The letters following MT or T such as O, C, and R denote the cultivars under the optimal and chilling temperatures and at recovery, respectively. a.u. represents arbitrary unit. Figure represents the average traces (n = 20) for MTO, MTC, MTR, TO, TC, and TR.

PItotal presents an overall view and health status of a plant (Strasser et al., 2004). (PItotal) drastically decreased under chilling stress in both cultivars, with larger reduction in Guitang 49 than Guitang 28 (Table 1). This damping off in PI represented inefficiency of reaction centers and electron transport and also the negative down-regulation of primary photochemistry of PSII by chilling stress. After chilling treatment, the extent of recovery was greater in Guitang 49 as compared to Guitang 28 as the level of damage was also larger in the former.

Reaction center per absorbance (RC/ABS), i.e., the number of active QA reducing reaction centers per antenna unit (Brestic et al., 2012), was less affected in Guitang 28 (∼10%) as compared with Guitang 49 (∼57%) (Table 1). As the reaction centers of the former were active even under chilling condition, this could be one of the reasons for robustness of Guitang 28. Fv/Fo represents water splitting complex at the donor side of PSII and primary photochemistry. Because of chilling stress, Fv/Fo was decreased to nearly 83 and 60% in Guitang 49 and Guitang 28, respectively (Table 1), indicating damage at water splitting complex, resulting in reduced primary photochemistry. The plants were kept for recovery for 3 days. After 3 days of recovery, Guitang 28 recovered to 90% of the original value of the optimum temperature, whereas Guitang 49 recovered only 66% of the optimum temperature (Figure 1 and Table 1), indicating an enhancement in primary photochemistry and overall photosynthetic efficiency.

Analysis of Antenna Size Heterogeneity, Leaf Optical Properties, and Chl Index Under Chilling Stress

Chilling stress caused a decrease in the number of active α centers and to a less extent increased active β centers (Figure 2) in both cultivars. PSIIα comprises Chl a–associated core complex, an accessory Chl a–b light-harvesting inner antenna (LHC II-inner), and a peripheral antenna (LHC II-peripheral) (Anderson and Melis, 1983). The decrease in the number of PSIIα may be a short-term response resulting in reorganization of the membrane with the disconnection of part of the antenna from PSII (Tikkanen and Aro, 2012). Another possibility is that under chilling stress, there is reorganization of PSII supercomplexes through monomerizations and migration, which often takes place under stress conditions (Bielczynski et al., 2016). Decrease in the number of PSIIα is accompanied with an increase in the number of PSIIβ followed by the conversion into the smallest PSIIγ due to chilling stress. This also led to migration of β components from appressed to non-appressed region of the thylakoid membrane, resulting in an increase in the number of inactive centers. Further, after 3 days of recovery, compared with Guitang 49, Guitang 28 showed more recovery for antenna size heterogeneity.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Complementary area growth curve showing percentage of PSIIα, β, and γ centers in sugarcane cultivars under different temperature conditions [25°C/15°C (day/night optimum temperature); 10°C/5°C (after 3 days’ exposure of day/night chilling temperature); and 25°C/15°C (recovery at 3 days after experiencing day/night chilling temperature)], where MT, moderately tolerant cultivar (Guitang 49); T, tolerant cultivar (Guitang 28). The letters following MT or T such as O, C, and R denote the cultivars under the optimal and chilling temperatures and at recovery, respectively. Figure represents the average traces (n = 10) for MTO, MTC, MTR, TO, TC, and TR.

Meanwhile, under chilling stress, leaf absorptance was decreased, and transmittance was increased in both cultivars (Table 2). However, reflectance of both cultivars exhibited contrasting trend. Guitang 28 showed lower transmittance and reflectance and higher absorptance under optimum and recovery conditions as compared to Guitang 49. But reflectance was increased in Guitang 28 when exposed to chilling stress, whereas transmittance was higher in Guitang 49. After 3 days of recovery, except transmittance, other optical properties were recovered from chilling stress (Table 2).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Change in leaf optical properties (light reflectance, transmittance, and absorptance) and chlorophyll index in sugarcane cultivars under different temperature conditions [25°C/15°C (OT; day/night optimum temperature); 10°C/5°C (CT; after 3 days’ exposure of day/night chilling temperature); and 25°C/15°C (RT; recovery at 3 days after experiencing day/night chilling temperature)].

Under different stress conditions, changes in leaf optical properties at visible wavelengths (400–720 nm) arise because of variations in Chl content (Carter and Knapp, 2001; Brugger et al., 2019). Chl is the key absorber of light in leaf, and metabolic maladjustments under chilling stress modify the leaf Chl content (Bauerle et al., 2004; Sakaigaichi et al., 2019). A slight decrease was observed in Chl index of both cultivars under chilling stress and recovery conditions, while there was no significant variation in the magnitude of change from optimum temperature condition to chilling temperature and recovery conditions (Table 2). Previously, Tang et al. (2015) reported the higher degree of decrease in Chl index of sugarcane under a higher level of chilling stress (<4°C) for longer duration, which was attributed to the accelerated rate of degradation of Chl pigments, and the same trend was reported in sugarcane clones under <10°C as well (Sakaigaichi et al., 2019). The slight reduction in our study can be the initial stage of Chl degradation, and slower recovery rates specify the same. Even a slight variation in Chl content has higher impact on leaf absorptance, and that in turn affects the reflectance and transmittance (Carter and Knapp, 2001; Bauerle et al., 2004). This alteration of optical properties in the current study is more likely a result of a loss or degradation of Chl content.

Analysis of Reducing Side Heterogeneity Under Chilling Stress

Reducing side heterogeneity decreased more in Guitang 49 as compared with Guitang 28 under chilling stress (Table 3). Reducing centers decreased by ∼37% in Guitang 49, whereas ∼20% in Guitang 28. The number of reducing centers decreased because chilling stress converted these reducing or active centers into inactive centers, and these centers were now unable to transport electron. Because of chilling stress, it might be possible that the active reducing centers migrated to the non-appressed part of thylakoid membrane from the appressed part (Anderson and Melis, 1983). In inactive centers, the electron transport from QA to PQ is nearly thousand times slower as compared with QB reducing centers. Under chilling conditions with increase in QB non-reducing center, a higher proportion of energy is diverted toward fluorescence and heat dissipation rather than being utilized in primary charge separation. As a result, increase in the proportion of QB non-reducing PSII centers increased the fluorescence emission at the O phase (Figure 1). This increase led to a linear decrease in Fv/Fm (Table 1; Zhu et al., 2005). After 3 days of recovery, Guitang 28 showed a higher rate of recovery as compared to Guitang 49.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Percentage change in QB reducing and QB non-reducing centers in sugarcane cultivars under different temperature conditions [25°C/15°C (day/night optimum temperature); 10°C/5°C (after 3 days’ exposure of day/night chilling temperature); and 25°C/15°C (recovery at 3 days after experiencing day/night chilling temperature)].

Effect of Chilling Stress on Gas Exchange

Under chilling stress, photosynthesis rate (PN), stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration (E), night respiration, and carboxylation capacity (CE) were significantly decreased in Guitang 49 as compared to Guitang 28. However, intercellular CO2 (Ci) increased more in Guitang 49 (Table 4). Also, Guitang 49 showed delayed recovery of above traits. Chilling stress causes partial closure of stomata because of simultaneous engagement of stomatal and non-stomatal regulations (Allen et al., 2000; Allen and Ort, 2001; Huang et al., 2016; Arena and Vitale, 2018), which resulted in decreased PN, gs, E, and CE and increase in Ci of sugarcane cultivars in the current study.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Change in photosynthetic gas exchange traits in sugarcane cultivars under different temperature conditions [25°C/15°C (OT; day/night optimum temperature); 10°C/5°C (CT; after 3 days’ exposure of day/night chilling temperature); and 25°C/15°C (RT; recovery at 3 days after experiencing day/night chilling temperature)].

Non-stomatal limitation occurs by the deactivation of enzymes associated with carbon fixation and related cascade of physiological and biochemical maladjustments, which increases Ci under chilling stress (Zhang and Scheller, 2004). This trend was observed in Guitang 49, and it was further confirmed by the higher decrease of PN and CE (Table 4). CE is the ratio between PN and Ci; lower CE values indicate higher Ci due to the lower carbon fixation (Rymbai et al., 2014). Meanwhile, an opposite trend was observed in Guitang 28. From this trend, it can be speculated that the enzymes related to carbon fixation was least affected in Guitang 28, which leads to the minor decrease in PN and CE (Table 4). Correspondingly, reduced gs is an indicator of stomatal limitation induced by chilling stress (Allen and Ort, 2001). Reduction in gs and E indicated that stomata of Guitang 49 were highly sensitive and affected with chilling stress. Similarly, response of Chl a fluorescence transients (Fv/Fm, Fv/Fo, and PI) also points toward lower tolerance of Guitang 49 and higher tolerance of Guitang 28 (Table 1).

Simultaneously, low rate of nighttime respiration was also a factor for lower chilling tolerance of Guitang 49 (Table 4). A higher level of chilling injuries to thylakoid membrane and photosystems of Guitang 49, as evident from the changes antenna size and reducing side heterogeneity and Chl a fluorescence transients values, caused reduction in photosynthesis, which subsequently delayed recovery of Guitang 49 (Table 1). Particularly, such circumstances occur because of reduction of maintenance respiration (Sunoj et al., 2016, 2020), which can cause slower maintenance of chilling injuries. On the other hand, ability of Guitang 28 to sustain higher nighttime respiration was an advantage over Guitang 49 under chilling stress by repairing the chilling injuries, maintaining a certain level of Fv/Fm, Fv/Fo, PI, and photosynthesis and was thereby supported for faster recovery of Guitang 28 (Tables 1, 4).

Photosynthesis and respiration (day and night time) are correspondingly significant for the carbon trade-off and growth (Sunoj et al., 2020). In plants, rather than energy cost for ion uptake and transport and growth, nighttime respiration has a significant role in maintenance of injuries, which occurs because of oxidative stress triggered by overproduction and accumulation of reactive oxygen species under optimum and diverse biotic and abiotic stress conditions (Djanaguiraman et al., 2013; Sperling et al., 2015). The balance between functions of nighttime respiration, specifically growth and maintenance, differs with the type and intensity of stress factors. Depending on the magnitude of damage caused by stress, more resources, approximately 30–70% of photosynthetically generated photosynthates (carbohydrates) instead of seldom used fatty acids, are channelized and utilized for the maintenance rather than growth (Djanaguiraman et al., 2013; Sunoj et al., 2016, 2020).

Such a kind of allocation of photosynthates via higher night respiration was reported to cause reduction in total biomass accumulation in maize and sorghum, but under long-term exposure to high-temperature stress condition (40 days) (Sunoj et al., 2016, 2020). However, in the current study, with short-term chilling stress exposure (3 days), relatively higher respiration than Guitang 49 contributed to the chilling tolerance of Guitang 28 by the maintenance of chilling injuries, and such trend can be considered as an advantage to confront sudden chilling incidence, which last only for a few days in natural condition. By virtue of adaptation in certain tolerant plant species to different abiotic stress factors, the magnitude of nighttime respiration varies as compared to the other susceptible plant species. Under chilling stress, nighttime respiration was reported to reduce in some plant species such as lettuce, tomato, and soybean (Frantz et al., 2004), which is similar to response of sugarcane cultivars used in the current study.

Conclusion

The present study revealed that chilling stress adversely affected PSII heterogeneity along with Chl a fluorescence transients, gas exchange (daytime photosynthesis and night respiration), leaf optical properties, and Chl index. Results indicated that the impact of chilling stress was high in moderately chilling tolerant Guitang 49 as compared to tolerant Guitang 28. A dramatic decline was obtained in maximal fluorescence, indicating damage at the donor side of PSII, and reflected in decreased quantum efficiency of PSII under chilling stress. Reaction centers of tolerant cultivar Guitang 28 were not much affected. Both cultivars showed distinguishable difference for reducing side and antenna size heterogeneity under chilling stress. Under chilling stress, QB non-reducing centers increased, due to conversion of active reducing centers into inactive ones. Chilling stress led to an increased number of PSIIβ and PSIIγ centers followed by a decrease in PSIIα center. Under chilling stress, reducing side heterogeneity and antenna size heterogeneity were downregulated more in Guitang 49 as compared to Guitang 28. Higher photosynthesis and nighttime respiration have also been proven to be a supporting factor for Guitang 28 to survive under chilling stress. The magnitude of recovery varied according to cultivar and extent of damage. This is the first ever study that has focused on PSII heterogeneity under chilling stress on the C4 crop sugarcane and proven an important role of PSII heterogeneity in sugarcane genotype under chilling stress, with connection to other physiological traits. Based on the present study, we conclude that PSII heterogeneity can be used as an additional non-invasive and novel technique for evaluating environmental stress in plants.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Author Contributions

SM, VS, and NE designed the study. SM and VS performed the experiments and analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. AJ, K-FC, and VR edited the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the visiting scholarship of Guangxi Science and Technology Department (GX2019007) to SM, by a Post Doctoral Fellowship from Guangxi University granted to VS, by a Bagui Scholarship (C33600992001) granted to K-FC. SM acknowledges University Grants Commission (UGC), India for awarding Post Doctoral Fellowship for Women (PDFWM-2014-15-GEMAD-23945).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

SM would like to acknowledge USDA and ORISE for the support. This research was supported in part by an appointment to the Agricultural Research Service (ARS) Research Participation Program administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). ORISE was managed by the ORAU under DOE contract number DE-SC0014664. All opinions expressed in this manuscript are the author’s and do not necessarily reflect the policies and views of USDA, DOE, or ORAU/ORISE.

Abbreviations

Chl, chlorophyll; Ci, intercellular CO2; E, transpiration; ET, electron transport; Fm, maximal fluorescence; Fv/Fm, quantum efficiency of PSII; gs, stomatal conductance; PI, performance index; PN, Net photosynthesis; RC/ABS, Reaction center per absorption.

References

Allen, D. J., and Ort, D. R. (2001). Impacts of chilling temperatures on photosynthesis in warm climate plants. Trends Plant Sci. 6, 36–42. doi: 10.1016/s1360-1385(00)01808-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Allen, D. J., Ratner, K., Giller, Y. E., Gussakovsky, E. E., Shahak, Y., and Ort, D. R. (2000). An overnight chill induces a delayed inhibition of photosynthesis at midday in mango (Mangifera indica L.). J. Exp. Bot. 51, 1893–1902. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/51.352.1893

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anderson, J. M., and Melis, A. (1983). Localization of different photosystems in separate regions of chloroplast membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80, 745–749. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.3.745

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Arena, C., and Vitale, L. (2018). Chilling-induced reduction of photosynthesis is mitigated by exposure to elevated CO2 concentrations. Photosynthetica 56, 1259–1267. doi: 10.1007/s11099-018-0843-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bauerle, W. L., Weston, D. J., Bowden, J. D., Dudley, J. B., and Toler, J. E. (2004). Leaf absorptance of photosynthetically active radiation in relation to chlorophyll meter estimates among woody plant species. Sci. Hortic. 101, 169–178. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2003.09.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bielczynski, L. W., Schansker, G., and Croce, R. (2016). Effect of light acclimation on the organization of Photosystem II super-and sub-complexes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 7:105. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brestic, M., Zivcak, M., Kalaji, H. M., Carpentier, R., and Allakhverdiev, S. I. (2012). Photosystem II thermostability in situ: environmentally induced acclimation and genotype-specific reactions in Triticum aestivum L. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 57, 93–105. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.05.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brugger, A., Behmann, J., Paulus, S., Luigs, H. G., Kuska, M. T., Schramowski, P., et al. (2019). Extending hyperspectral imaging for plant phenotyping to the uv-range. Remote Sens. 1:1401. doi: 10.3390/rs11121401

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carter, G. A., and Knapp, A. K. (2001). Leaf optical properties in higher plants: linking spectral characteristics to stress and chlorophyll concentration. Am. J. Bot. 88, 677–684. doi: 10.2307/2657068

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Djanaguiraman, M., Prasad, P. V. V., and Schapaugh, W. T. (2013). High day or nighttime temperature alters leaf assimilation, reproductive success, and phosphatidic acids of pollen grain in soybean [(L.) Merr.]. Crop Sci. 53:1594. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2012.07.0441

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ebrahim, M., Zingsheim, O., El-Shourbagy, M., Moore, P., and Komor, E. (1998). Growth and sugar storage in sugarcane grown at temperatures below and above optimum. J. Plant Physiol. 153, 593–602. doi: 10.1016/s0176-1617(98)80209-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Elsheery, N. I., Wilske, B., and Cao, K. F. (2008). The effect of night chilling on gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of two mango cultivars growing under two irradiances. Acta Bot. Yunnanica 30, 447–456.

Google Scholar

FAO (2017). Report, Food and Agricultural Organization, United Nations: Economic and Social Department, The Statistical Division, FAO 2017 FAOSTAT. 2018. Rome: FAO.

Google Scholar

Frantz, J. M., Cometti, N. N., and Bugbee, B. (2004). Night temperature has a minimal effect on respiration and growth in rapidly growing plants. Ann. Bot. 94, 155–166. doi: 10.1093/aob/mch122

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guenther, J. E., Nemson, J. A., and Melis, A. (1988). Photosystem stoichiometry and chlorophyll antenna size in Dunaliella salina (green algae). Biochim. Biophys. Acta 934, 108–117. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(88)90125-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hoagland, D. R., and Arnon, D. I. (1950). The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Circ. Calif. Agric. Exp. Station 347:32.

Google Scholar

Hsu, B. D., Lee, Y. S., and Jang, Y. R. (1989). A method for analysis of fluorescence induction curve from DCMU-poisoned chloroplasts. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 975, 44–49. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2728(89)80199-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, W., Hu, H., and Zhang, S. (2016). Photosynthesis and photosynthetic electron flow in the alpine evergreen species Quercus guyavifolia in winter. Front. Plant Sci. 7:1511. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01511

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, W., Zhang, S. B., and Cao, K. F. (2010). The different effects of chilling stress under moderate light intensity on photosystem II compared with photosystem I and subsequent recovery in tropical tree species. Photosynth. Res. 103, 175–182. doi: 10.1007/s11120-010-9539-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

IPCC (2013). “Summary for policymakers, in climate change: the physical science basis,” in Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G. K. Plattner, M. B. T. Melinda, K. A. Simon, B. Judith, et al. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1–27. doi: 10.1017/cbo9781107415324.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kadota, K., Furutani, R., Makino, A., Suzuki, Y., Wada, S., and Miyake, C. (2019). Oxidation of P700 induces alternative electron flow in Photosystem I in wheat leaves. Plants 8:152. doi: 10.3390/plants8060152

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kalachanis, D., and Manetas, Y. (2010). Analysis of fast chlorophyll fluorescence rise (O-K-J-IP) curves in green fruits indicates electron flow limitations at the donor side of PSII and the acceptor sides of both photosystems. Physiol. Plant. 139, 313–323.

Google Scholar

Lavergne, J. (1982). Two types of primary acceptors in chloroplasts photosystem II. Photobiochem. Photobiophys. 3, 257–285.

Google Scholar

Li, Y. R., Wu, J. M., Li, X., Zhang, H., Liu, X. H., and Tao, Y. L. (2015). Damage in sugarcane production caused by long duration of chilling frost in Guangxi. China. Inter. J. Agri. Innov. Res. 3, 1139–1144.

Google Scholar

Li, Y. R., and Yang, L. T. (2015). Sugarcane industry in China. Sugar Tech. 17, 1–8. doi: 10.1007/s12355-014-0342-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, L., Ji, H., An, J., Shi, K., Ma, J., Liu, B., et al. (2019). Response of biomass accumulation in wheat to low temperature stress at jointing and booting stages. Environ. Exp. Bot. 157, 46–57. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.09.026

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mathur, S., Allakhverdiev, S. I., and Jajoo, A. (2011). Analysis of high temperature stress on the dynamics of antenna size and reducing side heterogeneity of Photosystem II in wheat leaves (Triticum aestivum). Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1807, 22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.09.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mathur, S., and Jajoo, A. (2020). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi protects maize plants from high temperature stress by regulating photosystemII heterogeneity. Indus. Crops Prod. 143:111934. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111934

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mathur, S., Tomar, R. S., and Jajoo, A. (2019). Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) protects photosynthetic apparatus of wheat under drought stress. Photosynthe. Res. 139, 227–238. doi: 10.1007/s11120-018-0538-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Melis, A., and Homann, P. H. (1976). Heterogeneity of the photochemical centers in system II of chloroplasts. Photochem. Photobiol. 23, 343–350. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1976.tb07259.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rymbai, H., Laxman, R. H., Dinesh, M. R., Sunoj, V. S. J., Ravishankar, K. V., and Jha, A. K. (2014). Diversity in leaf morphology and physiological characteristics among mango (Mangifera indica) cultivars popular in different agro-climatic regions of India. Sci. Hortic. 176, 189–193. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2014.06.030

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sakaigaichi, T., Tsuchida, H., Adachi, K., Hattori, T., Tarumoto, Y., Tanaka, M., et al. (2019). Phenological changes in the chlorophyll content and its fluorescence in field-grown sugarcane clones under over-wintering conditions. Sugar Tech. 21, 843–846. doi: 10.1007/s12355-018-0693-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Selvarajan, D., Mohan, C., Dhandapani, V., Nerkar, G., Jayanarayanan, A., Mohanan, V., et al. (2018). Differential gene expression profiling through transcriptome approach of Saccharum spontaneum L. under low temperature stress reveals genes potentially involved in cold acclimation. Biotech. 8:195.

Google Scholar

Sperling, O., Earles, J. M., Secchi, F., Godfrey, J., and Zwieniecki, M. A. (2015). Frost induces respiration and accelerates carbon depletion in trees. PLoS One 10:e0144124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144124

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Strasser, R. J., and Tsimilli-Michael, M. (1998). “Activity and heterogeneity of PSII probed in vivo by the Chlorophyll a fluorescence rise O-(K)-J-I-P,” in Photosynthesis: Mechanisms and Effects, ed. G. Garab (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 4321–4324. doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-3953-3_999

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Strasser, R. J., Tsimilli-Michael, M., and Srivastava, A. (2004). “Analysis of chlorophyll a fluorescence transient,” in Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration: Chlorophyll a Fluorescence: A Signature of Photosynthesis, ed. P. G. Govindjee (Dordrecht: Springer), 321–362. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-3218-9_12

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sunoj, V. S. J., Impa, M. S., Chiluwal, A., Perumal, R., Prasad, P. V. V., and Krishna Jagadish, S. V. (2017). Resilience of pollen and post flowering response in diverse sorghum genotypes exposed to heat stress under field conditions. Crop Sci. 57, 1–12.

Google Scholar

Sunoj, V. S. J., Prasad, P. V. V., Ciampitti, I. A., and Maswada, H. F. (2020). Narrowing diurnal temperature amplitude alters carbon trade off and reduces growth in C4 crop sorghum. Front. Plant Sci. 11:1262. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01262

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sunoj, V. S. J., Shroyer, K. J., Krishna, S. V., and Prasad, P. V. V. (2016). Diurnal temperature amplitude alters physiological and biochemical response of Maize (Zea mays) during the vegetative stage. Environ. Exp. Bot. 130, 113–121. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.04.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tang, S. Y., Li, Y. R., and Yang, L. T. (2015). Evaluation of cold tolerance and photosynthetic characteristic in different sugarcane genotypes. J. Global Biosci. 4, 2459–2467.

Google Scholar

Tikkanen, M., and Aro, E. M. (2012). Thylakoid protein phosphorylation in dynamic regulation of Photosystem II in higher plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1817, 232–238. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2011.05.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tomar, R. S., Mathur, S., Allakhverdiev, S. I., and Jajoo, A. (2012). Changes in PS II heterogeneity in response to osmotic and ionic stress in wheat leaves (Triticum aestivum). J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 44, 411–419. doi: 10.1007/s10863-012-9444-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Toth, S. Z., Schansker, G., and Strasser, R. J. (2005). In intact leaves, the maximum fluorescence level(FM) is independent of the redox state of the plastoquinone pool: a DCMU-inhibition study. Biochim. Biophyis. Acta 1708, 275–282.

Google Scholar

Yusuf, M. A., Rajwanshi, D. K. R., Strasser, R. J., Tsimilli-Michael, M., Govindjee, and Sarin, N. M. (2010). Overexpression of c-tocopherol methyl transferase gene in transgenic Brassica juncea plants alleviates abiotic stress: physiological and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1797, 1428–1438. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.02.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, S., and Scheller, H. V. (2004). Photoinhibition of photosystem I at chilling temperature and subsequent recovery in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 45, 1595–1602. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pch180

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, X. G., Govindjee, Baker, N. R., deSturler, E., Ort, D. R., and Long, S. P. (2005). Chlorophyll a fluorescence induction kinetics in leaves predicted a model describing each discrete step of excitation energy transfer associated with Photosystem. Planta 223, 114–133. doi: 10.1007/s00425-005-0064-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: chlorophyll a fluorescence, chilling stress, photosynthesis, PSII heterogeneity, sugarcane

Citation: Mathur S, Sunoj VSJ, Elsheery NI, Reddy VR, Jajoo A and Cao K-F (2021) Regulation of Photosystem II Heterogeneity and Photochemistry in Two Cultivars of C4 Crop Sugarcane Under Chilling Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 12:627012. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.627012

Received: 07 November 2020; Accepted: 04 January 2021;
Published: 10 February 2021.

Edited by:

Carmen Arena, University of Naples Federico II, Italy

Reviewed by:

Luca Vitale, National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Italy
Lorenzo Ferroni, University of Ferrara, Italy

Copyright © 2021 Mathur, Sunoj, Elsheery, Reddy, Jajoo and Cao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Sonal Mathur, sonal.mathur@usda.gov; mathurksonal@gmail.com

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.