In the original article, there was a mistake in the legend for Table 2 as published. Osmotic potential as demonstrated in the equation in the material and methods is the negative value. The correct legend appears below.
The fractionation of the sugars was removed due to duplicate results, probably caused by contamination of the samples. However, the presentation of soluble sugars and starch allows to maintain the same discussion together with the other results.
In the original article, there was a mistake in the legend for Figure 4 as published. The correct legend appears below.
With the removal of the fractionation of sugars, Figure 7 was changed, as the PCA is a synthesis of the analyzed variables.
Table 2
| Location | Season | Year | –ΨS (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semiarid | Drought | 2012 | 1.33 ± 0.03 AB |
| 2013 | 1.41 ± 0.02 B | ||
| Rainy | 2012 | 1.34 ± 0.04 AB | |
| 2013 | 1.22 ± 0.03 A | ||
| Seacoast | Drought | 2012 | 1.07 ± 0.03 NS |
| 2013 | 1.14 ± 0.03 | ||
| Rainy | 2012 | 1.18 ± 0.02 | |
| 2013 | 1.20 ± 0.04 |
Osmotic potential (−ΨS) in Calotropis procera during drought and rainy seasons (2012 and 2013) in semi-arid and seacoast regions (n = 4 ± SE).
Means followed by different letters are significantly different according to the Student-Newman-Keuls test (P < 0.05).
Figure 4
Figure 7
In the original article, there was a mistake in the legend for Figure 7 as published. The correct legend appears below.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Summary
Keywords
C3 photosynthesis, evergreen, leaf anatomy, oxidative stress, plant biomass, sugars metabolism
Citation
Rivas R, Barros V, Falcão H, Frosi G, Arruda E and Santos M (2020) Corrigendum: Ecophysiological Traits of Invasive C3 Species Calotropis procera to Maintain High Photosynthetic Performance Under High VPD and Low Soil Water Balance in Semi-Arid and Seacoast Zones. Front. Plant Sci. 11:611685. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.611685
Received
29 September 2020
Accepted
19 October 2020
Published
11 November 2020
Volume
11 - 2020
Edited and reviewed by
William Walter Adams III, University of Colorado Boulder, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Rivas, Barros, Falcão, Frosi, Arruda and Santos.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mauro Santos mauro.gsantos@ufpe.br
This article was submitted to Plant Abiotic Stress, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.