- 1Rice Research Institute of Shenyang Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Northern Japonica Rice Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Education and Liaoning Province, Shenyang, China
- 2State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou, China
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is an important cereal that provides food for more than half of the world’s population. Besides grain yield, improving grain quality is also essential to rice breeders. Amylose content (AC), gelatinization temperature (GT) and gel consistency (GC) are considered to be three indicators for cooking and eating quality in rice. Using a genetic map of RILs derived from the super rice Liang-You-Pei-Jiu with high-density SNPs, we detected 3 QTLs for AC, 3 QTLs for GT, and 8 QTLs for GC on chromosomes 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, and 12. Wx locus, an important determinator for AC and GC, resided in one QTL cluster for AC and GC, qAC6 and qGC6 here. And a novel major QTL qGC10 on chromosome 10 was identified in both Lingshui and Hangzhou. With the BC4F2 population derived from a CSSL harboring the segment for qGC10 from 93-11 in PA64s background, it was fine mapped between two molecular markers within 181 kb region with 27 annotated genes. Quantitative real-time PCR results showed that eight genes were differentially expressed in endosperm of two parents. After DNA sequencing, only LOC_Os10g04900, which encodes a F-box domain containing protein, has 2 bp deletion in the exon of PA64s, resulting in a premature stop codon. Therefore, LOC_Os10g04900 is considered to be the most likely candidate gene for qGC10 associated with gel consistency. Identification of qGC10 provides a new genetic resource for improvement of rice quality.
Introduction
Rice is one of the most important crops served as staple food for more than half of world population. Rice planting area has reached 30.18 million hectares in 2018, and rice production was about 202.70 million tons, accounting for 25.80% of total grain output. It is a milestone in the history of rice breeding that the application of hybrid rice in 1970s (Li et al., 2016). The development of hybrid rice in China has made great contribution to the world’s rice yield. Recently, besides pursuing of high yield, more attention has been paid to rice quality. Liang-You-Pei-Jiu, the super hybrid rice from the cross of the indica variety 93-11 and the light-thermo-sensitive genic male sterile line PA64s was a successful example with 10.5 tons per hectare in 2000 (Gao et al., 2013). However, compared to rice production, the development of quality breeding was relatively stunted (Su et al., 2011). Therefore, with better living conditions, in order to meet the demands of people, rice quality needs to be improved by breeders.
Rice quality includes various characteristics when it is being produced, processed, sold, cooked and ate. In general, it involves processing quality (also called milling quality), appearance quality, cooking and eating quality and nutritional quality. High quality rice included 14 indicators, among which the milled rice rate, chalky degree, eating quality and amylose content were grading indexes while roughness, chalky rate, grain shape, gel consistency were indexes for reference. The amylose content (AC), gelatinization temperature (GT) and gel consistency (GC) are three major indicators for physical and chemical characteristics of the starch in rice endosperm which, directly affected cooking and eating quality (Sun S. -Y. et al., 2005).
GC, being a kind of colloidal property of rice starch and referring to viscosity of 4.4% rice glue, is an important indicator of rice quality. It can be divided into three categories: soft (>60 mm), adhesive (40–60 mm) and hard GC (<40 mm). Rice with hard GC is rough and fluffy, and becomes hard and dry after cool; while rice with soft GC is soft and elastic, and still keeps soft after cooling. Usually, the larger GC, the softer, stickier, better taste and shinier rice (Wang et al., 2007).
Previous studies indicated natural genetic variations for rice quality (Tian et al., 2009). As a quantitative trait, GC is suitable for QTL analysis and its genetic basis is also complicated. So far, 22 QTLs for GC have been reported on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, and 101. He et al. (1999) detected two major QTLs for GC on chromosomes 2 and 7, which explain 20.2 and 14.2% of the genetic variation, respectively. Huang et al. (2000) used rice varieties with high GC and middle GC as two parents to construct the recombinant inbred lines (RILs), and detected two major QTLs for GC on chromosome 3. A major QTL for GC was identified by State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute with double haploid (DH) population came from TN1 and CJ6, and further fine mapped and confirmed to be the Wx gene (Su et al., 2011). Because the Wx gene was reported to controlling AC, and GC was found negatively correlated with AC (Zhang et al., 2002; Sun Y. et al., 2005), therefore, both GC and AC were controlled by Wx. However, association analysis showed the Wx gene only account for nearly 40% of phenotypic variation for GC (Tian et al., 2009). And some varieties with same level of AC exhibited different GC (Sun Y. et al., 2005). A gene responsible for GT, ALK, was also reported as a modifier gene for GC in rice (Gao et al., 2011). Thus, other QTLs/genes are to be mapped and isolated to clarify the genetic basis for GC.
Although QTL mapping for rice quality initiated in the 1990s, few studies on fine mapping of QTLs for cooking and eating quality have been reported. Here, we detected QTLs for cooking and eating quality of super rice and fine mapped a novel QTL qGC10 for GC, which will help further cloning of the QTL/gene and improvement of rice quality.
Materials and Methods
Cultivation and Management of Experimental Materials
A RIL from a cross between 93-11 and PA64s were used in this study for cooking quality traits analysis (Gao et al., 2013). Total of 1779 high-quality polymorphic SNP markers were used to construct the linkage map with 1568.21 cM (Supplementary Data S1). The parents 93-11 is an indica variety and the PA64s is the indica type light-thermo sensitive genic male sterile line. A total of 116 and 102 RILs were cultivated in Hangzhou (HZ) in 2011 and Lingshui (LS) in 2011, 2012, respectively. Each line was grown in triplicate in a randomized block design. The plot size was four rows of six plants with 20 × 20 cm spacing. Field management and chemical input for disease and pest control followed the standard procedures to avoid yield loss during the whole growth duration. Mature seeds of each line (3 biological repetitions) and two parents (6 biological repetitions) were harvested 30 days after heading and dried in an electro-thermal incubator (ZXDP-A2160, Shanghai) at 30°C for 72 h. The dried seeds (20 g) were shucked and polished.
Development of Fine Mapping Population
To develop a chromosome segment substitution line (CSSL) containing the qGC10 for GC detected both in Lingshui and Hangzhou on chromosome 10, a line of RILs with 93-11 genotype in the qGC10 region was selected to backcross with recurrent parent PA64s. Two markers IND-1 and IND-6 (Supplementary Table S1) were used for marker assisted selection (MAS) of each generation. As a result, a BC4F1 line was constructed exhibiting heterozygous across the entire qGC10 region with genetic background of PA64s. After self-crossing, a BC4F2 population was obtained for fine mapping of qGC10. A NIL carrying homozygous allele of 93-11 in the target QTL region between markers IND-4 and SNP-1 (Supplementary Table S1), designated NIL-qGC10, was also developed with PA64s background.
Measurement of Cooking and Eating Quality in Rice
Apparant Amylose content (AAC) was measured following the procedure of Perez and Juliano with some modifications (Perez and Juliano, 1978). Absorbance of the starch solution was determined at 620 nm using the spectrophotometer. Gelatinization temperature (GT) was indirectly estimated via the alkali digestion test (Little et al., 1958). Six whole-grain, milled rice samples were placed in triplicate square plastic boxes containing 10 mL 1.7% potassium hydroxide (KOH). The boxes were incubated for 23 h at 30°C. Grain appearance and disintegration were visually rated after incubation based on the standard numerical scale and expressed with alkali spreading value (ASV). Gel Consistency (GC) was evaluated according to Cagampang et al. (1973). Rice starch becomes rice paste glue after dilute alkali and heat treatment, after cooling in the horizontal tube has a certain degree of extension (Tran et al., 2011). Technical measurements were performed for each sample in triplicate.
DNA Isolation and PCR Analysis
Genomic DNA of the parents and BC4F2 individuals was extracted from fresh leaves using the CTAB method (Aline et al., 2009). DNA amplification was performed using a Gene Amp PCR system 9700 thermo cycler. PCR was performed in a 15 μL reaction mix including 25 ng genomic DNA, 2 μL of each primer, 1.0 μL 10 × PCR buffer, 0.1 mmol/L dNTP, 0.2 μL 5 U/μL Taq DNA polymerase (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China) and 1.5 μL ddH2O. Amplification conditions consisted of an initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55–60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 10 min, and saving at 15°C forever.
Statistical Analyses and QTL Analysis
All statistical analyses were completed using the SAS (Statistical Analysis System) v8.01. QTL analysis was performed with the MultiQTL package2 using the maximum likelihood interval mapping approach for the RIL-selfing population. For major-effect QTLs, the LOD threshold was obtained based on a permutation test (1000 permutations, P = 0.05) for each dataset. QTLs were named according to McCouch et al. (1997).
Design of Markers for Fine Mapping
Primers were designed in qGC10 region on the basis of insertions/deletions (InDels) and SNPs identified between 93-11 and PA64s (Supplementary Table S1) (Gao et al., 2013). Genotypes of SNP markers were screened by high-resolution dissociation curve analysis system (LightScanner 96, Idaho Technology Inc.).
Determination of RVA
Pasting properties of starch granules were analyzed by RVA model 3-D (Newport Scientific, Sydney, NSW, Australia), a programmed heating and cooling cycle was followed, as described by Toyoshima et al. (1997) and analyzed with Thermal Cycle for Windows (TCW). Duplicate measurements were performed for each sample of each line (3 biological repetitions). The main steps and the relevant parameters: Three gram flour of each sample at 14% moisture was weighed into aluminum canister, then 25 mL distilled water was added. A paddle was placed in the canister to mix the sample. The RVA disperses the samples by rotating the paddle at 960 rpm for the first l0 s of the test, after which the viscosity is sensed using a constant paddle rotation speed of 160 rpm. The idle temperature is set to 50°C and the following 12.5 min test profiles were run: (1) 50°C held for 1.0 min, (2) the temperature is linearly ramped up to 95°C until 4.8 min, (3) the temperature is held at 95°C until 7.5 min, (4) the temperature is linearly ramped down to 50°C at 11 min, (5) held at 50°C until 12.5 min (Yan et al., 2005). The determination was repeated two times per sample. RVA curve was described by six parameters: peak viscosity, holding strength, breakdown, final viscosity, consistence and setback. All the viscosity parameters were expressed in Rapid Viscosity Units (RVU).
Results
Phenotypic Variation of Cooking and Eating Quality in the Parents and RILs
Significant differences existed in AAC, GT and GC between two parents in both Lingshui and Hangzhou (Table 1 and Figure 1). A total of 116 and 102 RILs, together with their parents from Hangzhou and Lingshui were investigated respectively for the three indexes for cooking and eating quality. For each trait, the distribution of the RIL population appeared continuously with transgressive characteristic in the two environments. Nearly normal continuous distributions of phenotypic values were observed from LS population for AAC and GC and HZ population for GC, which indicated that AAC and GC were controlled by poly-genes (Supplementary Figure S1). In HZ population, AAC and GT showed bimodal distribution of phenotypic values, which indicated that AAC and GT were controlled by a major gene and some minor genes (Supplementary Figure S1).
Figure 1. Phenotype of amylose content (AAC, A), gelatinization temperature (ASV, B) and gel consistency (C) in parents 93-11 and PA64s. The error bar for each value represents mean ± SD (n = 6). * and ** indicate at 5 and 1% significant level compared to 93-11 according to t-test (n = 6), respectively.
Correlation Analysis of Three Traits
Based on Pearson’s correlation analysis, trait correlations between cooking and eating quality parameters showed that GC exhibited significantly negative correlation to AAC and GT in HZ and GT in LS (Table 2). The correlation between AAC and GC was negative and highly significant in HZ while little in LS. Similarly, GC showed a significantly negative correlation to GT in both LS and HZ. There was no significant correlation between AAC and GT, whether in LS or HZ. These findings supported that GC is an important factor affecting cooking and eating quality.
Identification of QTLs for Cooking and Eating Quality Traits
A linkage map with high density SNP markers covering 12 chromosomes has been established to detect QTLs for rice cooking and eating quality traits, with a total distance of 1568.21 cM and the average distance of about 0.88 cM between the markers. A total of 14 QTLs, including 3 QTLs for AC, 3 QTLs for GT and 8 QTLs for GC were identified on chromosomes 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, and 12 (Table 3 and Figure 2). One QTL cluster for AC and GC was detected on chromosome 6. The qAC6 covering the Wx gene (Fan et al., 2005), detected in both LS and HZ between markers SNP6-1 and SNP6-27, SNP6-1 and SNP6-11 on chromosome 6, explained 35.7 and 64.9% of phenotypic variation, respectively. Meanwhile, the qGT6 in LS and HZ covering the ALK gene (Gao et al., 2011), were identically mapped between SNP6-50 and SNP6-96 on chromosome 6, explained 23.4 and 41.8% of total phenotypic variation in LS and HZ, respectively. The major QTL, qGC6, was preliminary mapped on chromosome 6 in the interval of SNP6-1 and SNP6-19 in LS in 2011, SNP6-1 and SNP6-27 in LS in 2012, SNP6-1 and SNP6-23 in HZ in 2011 accounting for 11.4, 12.3, and 11.2% of phenotypic variance, individually. The qGC10 was identified on chromosome 10 for three times with explained phenotypic variation of 13.8, 14.0, and 12.2%, respectively in LS in 2011, 2012 and HZ in 2011.
Figure 2. Location of QTLs for AC, GT, and GC on SNP map. Number indicates genetic distance (cM) along each chromosome.
The Relationship Between Rapid Visco Analyzer (RVA) Profile Characteristic Values and GC
The determination of rice viscosity can simulate the dynamic changes of the rice cooking process, and the viscosity characteristics are measured to reflect the taste and texture of the rice. GC is an important index that affects the RVA profile characteristic values (Jia et al., 2008). Therefore, we determined the RVA profiles of two parents and CSSL-qGC10. Consistent with GC phenotype (Figure 3A), RVA spectrum of PA64s showed the lowest peak viscosity and the highest final viscosity, indicating that the cold rice after cooking may become harder (Table 4 and Figure 3B). Peak viscosity and final viscosity of CSSL-qGC10 exhibited values between 93-11 and PA64s. Meanwhile, PA64s had the smallest breakdown value and the largest setback value, which is in agreement with the previous reports (Zheng et al., 2018).
Figure 3. GC phenotype and Rapid Visco Analyzer (RVA) profile characteristic values in 93-11, PA64s and CSSL-qGC10. (A) GC phenotype in 93-11, PA64s and CSSL-qGC10. Rice flour becomes rice paste glue after dilute alkali and heat treatment. It has a certain degree of extension when cooling in the horizontal tube with total length of 100 mm, and the extended length represents GC value. (B) RVA profile characteristic values in 93-11, PA64s and CSSL-qGC10. The RVA spectrum simulates the process of rice cooking and reflects the taste and texture of rice. RVA is represented by Relative Viscosity Units (RVU).
Fine Mapping of qGC10
For fine mapping of qGC10, a CSSL CSSL-qGC10 with PA64s background was constructed to develop BC4F2 population by backcrossing to PA64s and self-pollination. Based on the resequencing data of 93-11 and PA64s, several InDel markers were designed to screen the population (Supplementary Table S1). According to the GC value, lines with high GC (>60 mm) and low GC (¡40 mm) were selected for fine mapping. Combining the phenotype and genotype analysis, qGC10 was finally delimited in 181 kb region between markers IND-4 and SNP-1 on chromosome 10 (Figure 4A).
Figure 4. Fine mapping of qGC10. (A) qGC10 was narrowed down to a 181 kb interval defined by markers IND-4 and SNP-1. Values represent means ± SD (n ≥ 3). Different letters represent significant differences (P < 0.05) by t-test. (B) All the 27 predicted genes in the target region. (C) Structure and mutated sites of the most likely candidate gene. LOC_Os10g04900 consist of one exon (represent with black box). Arrow indicates the deletion of 2 bp in the position of PA64s compared to 93-11.
Candidate Genes Determination at the qGC10 Locus
According to Rice Genome Annotation Project Database3, there were 27 annotated genes in 181 kb target region for qGC10 on chromosome 10 (Table 5 and Figure 4B). Among them, 8 genes differentially expressed in endosperm between 93-11 and PA64s were sequenced and 2 bp deletion (G84G85) was detected in the exon of LOC_Os10g04900 in PA64s (Figures 4C, 5 and Supplementary Figure S2), resulting in a premature stop codon and a protein with only 28 amino acids. And LOC_Os10g04900 is highly expressed in the panicle (Supplementary Figure S3). Therefore, LOC_Os10g04900 was considered the most likely candidate gene for qGC10 locus associated with GC.
Figure 5. Relative expression of 8 genes in the endosperm of 93-11 and PA64s. The error bar for each value represents mean ± SD (n = 3). ** indicate at 1% significant level compared to PA64s according to t test.
Discussion
High density genetic linkage map combined with different populations facilitate QTL identification and fine mapping. With different genetic populations, such as F2 population, double haploid (DH) population, RILs, CSSLs and near-isogenic lines (NILs), hundreds of genomic regions associated with cooking and eating quality traits have been identified in rice (Su et al., 2011). Among them, CSSLs and NILs are effective materials for QTL mapping and positional cloning owing to all lines have the same background without complex variations in genetic background (Zhou et al., 2009; Anis et al., 2019).
AC, GT, and GC are considered to be three vital traits that determine cooking and eating quality of rice (Tan et al., 1999). As quantitative traits, they are determined mainly by genetic factors and affected by environmental conditions (Fan et al., 2005). Series of QTLs have been reported for AC, GT and GC (Sun S. -Y. et al., 2005; Su et al., 2011; Ponce et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2018). However, only few QTLs have been fine mapped or cloned. In the study, we used a RIL population derived from a cross between PA64s and 93-11 to identify QTLs for AC, GT under two environments, and GC under three environments. Some QTLs were environmentally dependent, such as qAC3, qGT12, qGC4 and qGC5 detected in LS in 2011, whose phenotypic variances explained (PEV) were relatively lower. However, stable QTLs detected in different environments, for example, a novel major QTL qGC10 detected in both LS (2011 and 2012) and HZ (2011) were suitable for fine mapping further.
In Hangzhou, GC showed negative but significant correlation with AC (Table 2), which indicated that AC affect GC in cooked rice. Both in Lingshui and Hangzhou, GC was also negatively correlated with GT. These results suggested glossy sticky rice texture tend to have high AC and undergo fast breakdown of starch molecules (Su et al., 2011; Pang et al., 2016), supporting the fact that indeed GC was the important factor affecting cooking quality traits (Bao et al., 2006; Gao et al., 2011).
Notably, chromosome 6 contained most of QTLs identified here responsible for AC, GT and GC, where located one QTL cluster for AC and GC. We also detected a major QTL for AC, qAC6, located on the same locus of previously reported QTL on chromosome 6 (Sabouri et al., 2012). AC was related with variations at the waxy gene on chromosome 6 and several other modifiers (Lanceras et al., 2000; Septiningsih et al., 2003; Aluko et al., 2004; Takeuchi et al., 2007). GT was controlled by a major QTL on chromosome 6 covering the ALK gene (He et al., 1999; Lanceras et al., 2000; Umemoto et al., 2002; Gao et al., 2003), where the qGT6 mapped here. The qGT12 for GT identified on chromosome 12 in our study was also reported previously (Liu et al., 2014). Therefore, our results were consistent with previous studies that GT was controlled by ALK and other minor QTLs.
Several major QTLs for GC have been reported, such as qGC6, whose mapped interval including the Wx gene. Previous studies showed that Wx also regulated GC in rice, and in turn affected grain quality (Su et al., 2011). In our experiments, one QTL for GC, qGC6 detected on chromosome 6, was co-located with qAC6. This QTL cluster covered the Wx gene, which play an important role in controlling AC. Wx is not only the key gene for AC, but also a modifier gene for GC in rice (Tian et al., 2009). Besides, a novel major QTL, qGC10 for GC was mapped on chromosome 10. We further fine mapped the qGC10 within 2.37–2.55 Mb region with a BC4F2 population. In the target region, 8 genes differentially expressed in endosperm were sequenced and only LOC_Os10g04900, encoding a F-box domain containing protein, was found to have 2 bp insertion/deletion in the exon between two parents, 93-11 and PA64s (Figures 4C, 5 and Supplementary Figure S2). Quantitative real-time PCR results showed that LOC_Os10g04900 is highly expressed in the panicle (Supplementary Figure S3). Previous study have found that LOC_Os10g04900 was expressed in the milk stage grains by analyzing expression pattern in different developmental stages in rice (Yang et al., 2012). In other crops, its homologous proteins were also found expressed in seeds of Barley (Hordeum vulgare, BAK07103) and Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor, XP_002461331)4. Hence, LOC_Os10g04900 is considered the most likely candidate gene for the qGC10 locus associated with gel consistency and to be confirmed further by complementation test.
Conclusion
Cooking and eating quality is an economically vital trait for rice. Understanding of genetic mechanism underlying cooking and eating quality will be beneficial for breeding of new rice varieties with high yield and good quality. Total of 3 QTLs for AC, 3 QTLs for GT and 8 QTLs for GC were detected on chromosomes 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, and 12 using high-resolution genetic map of RILs derived from super rice Liang-You-Pei-Jiu. A novel major QTL for GC, qGC10 was identified on chromosome 10 in rice. With the BC4F2 population derived from the CSSL-qGC10, it was delimited to 181 kb region. The target region contained 27 annotated genes according to Rice Genome Annotation Project Website5, among which 8 genes differentially expressed in endosperm were sequenced and only LOC_Os10g04900 had 2 bp deletion in exon in PA64s, resulting in a premature stop codon. Therefore, LOC_Os10g04900 is considered the most likely candidate gene for qGC10 associated with gel consistency. Identification of qGC10 not only promotes exploration of molecular and biological function of the QTL/gene, but provides a new genetic resource for rice quality improvement.
Data Availability Statement
The data for this study can be found at: For PA64s genome sequence, the accession number is PRJNA208877 and the link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA208877.
Author Contributions
ZG designed the research. AZ, YG, YL, BR, SY, CL, BZ, HJ, GF, SD, NJ, LX, and GD performed the research. AZ, ZX, LG, QQ, and ZG analyzed the data. AZ and ZG wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFD0100902-07) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31671761).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2020.00342/full#supplementary-material
FIGURE S1 | Phenotype distribution of AC, GT, and GC in RIL population in Lingshui (LS) and Hangzhou (HZ). Triplicate measurements were performed for each sample (n = 3). Arrowheads indicate the means of 93-11 and PA64s (n = 6).
FIGURE S2 | Sequence difference of LOC_Os10g04900 between 93-11 and PA64s.
FIGURE S3 | Relative Expression of LOC_Os10g04900 in different tissues of PA64s. The error bar for each value represents mean ± SD (n = 3).
TABLE S1 | Primers for fine mapping of qGC10.
DATA S1 | Statistic summary of genetic map.
Footnotes
- ^ http://archive.gramene.org/db/qtl/
- ^ www.multiqtl.com
- ^ http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/cgi-bin/gbrowse/rice/
- ^ https://www.uniprot.org
- ^ http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/
References
Aline, B., Silva, R. M., Henrique, R. G., De, Q. S. J. R., Andrade, B. E. D., and Ann, V. E. (2009). Ctab methods for dna extraction of sweetpotato for microsatellite analysis. Sci. Agric. 66, 529–534. doi: 10.1590/S0103-90162009000400015
Aluko, G., Martinez, C., Tohme, J., Catano, C., Bergman, C., and Oard, J. H. (2004). QTL mapping of grain quality traits from the interspecific cross Oryza sativa × O. glaberrima. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109, 630–639. doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1668-y
Anis, G. B., Zhang, Y., Islam, A., Zhang, Y., Cao, Y., Wu, W., et al. (2019). RDWN6XB, a major quantitative trait locus positively enhances root system architecture under nitrogen deficiency in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 19:12. doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1620-y
Bao, J., Corke, H., and Sun, M. (2006). Nucleotide diversity in starch synthase IIa and validation of single nucleotide polymorphisms in relation to starch gelatinization temperature and other physicochemical properties in rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 113, 1171–1183. doi: 10.1007/s00122-006-0355-6
Cagampang, G. B., Perez, C. M., and Juliano, B. O. (1973). A gel consistency test for the eating quality of rice. Sci. Food Agric. 24, 1589–1594. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740241214
Fan, C. C., Yu, X. Q., Xing, Y. Z., Xu, C. G., Luo, L. J., and Zhang, Q. F. (2005). The main effects, epistatic effects and environmental interactions of QTLs on the cooking and eating quality of rice in a doubled-haploid line population. Theor. Appl. Genet. 110, 1445–1452. doi: 10.1007/s00122-005-1975-y
Gao, Z., Zeng, D., Cheng, F., Tian, Z., Guo, L., Su, Y., et al. (2011). ALK, the key gene for gelatinization temperature, is a modifier gene for gel consistency in rice. Integr. Plant Biol. 53, 756–765. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2011.01065.x
Gao, Z., Zeng, D., Cui, X., Zhou, Y., Yan, M., Huang, D., et al. (2003). Map-based cloning of the ALK gene, which controls the gelatinization temperature of rice. Sci. China C Life Sci. 46, 661–668. doi: 10.1360/03yc0099
Gao, Z., Zhao, S., He, W., Guo, L., Peng, Y., Wang, J., et al. (2013). Dissecting yield-associated loci in super hybrid rice by resequencing recombinant inbred lines and improving parental genome sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 14492–14497. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1306579110
He, P., Li, S., Qian, Q., Ma, Y., Li, J., Wang, W., et al. (1999). Genetic analysis of rice grain quality. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98, 502–508. doi: 10.1007/s001220051098
Huang, Z., Tan, X., Xu, C., and Vanavichit, A. (2000). Molecular mapping QTLs for gel consistency in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Sci. Agric. Sin. 33, 1–5.
Jia, L., Ding, X., Wang, P., and Deng, X. (2008). Rice RVA profile characteristics and correlation with the physical/chemical quality. Acta Agron. Sin. 34, 790–794. doi: 10.3724/sp.j.1006.2008.00790
Lanceras, J. C., Huang, Z., Naivikul, O., Vanavichit, A., Ruanjaichon, V., and Tragoonrung, S. (2000). Mapping of genes for cooking and eating qualities in Thai Jasmine rice (KDML105). DNA Res. 7, 93–101. doi: 10.1093/dnares/7.2.93
Li, D., Huang, Z., Song, S., Xin, Y., Mao, D., Lv, Q., et al. (2016). Integrated analysis of phenome, genome, and transcriptome of hybrid rice uncovered multiple heterosis-related loci for yield increase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, E6026–E6035. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1610115113
Little, R. R., Hilder, G. B., and Dawson, E. H. (1958). Differential effect of dilute alkali on 25 varieties of milled white rice. Cereal Chem. 35, 111–126.
Liu, X., Zhu, K., Zhang, C., Hong, R., Sun, P., Tang, S., et al. (2014). Mapping of minor QTLs for rice gelatinization temperature using chromosome segment substitution lines from Indica 9311 in the Japonica background. Acta Agron. Sin. 40, 1740–1747.
McCouch, S. R., Chen, X., Panaud, O., Temnykh, S., Xu, Y., Cho, Y. G., et al. (1997). Microsatellite marker development, mapping and applications in rice genetics and breeding. Plant Mol. Biol. 35, 89–99. doi: 10.1023/A:1005711431474
Pang, Y., Ali, J., Wang, X., Franje, N. J., Revilleza, J. E., Xu, J., et al. (2016). Relationship of rice grain amylose, gelatinization temperature and pasting properties for breeding better eating and cooking quality of rice varieties. PLoS One 11:e0168483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168483
Perez, C. M., and Juliano, B. O. (1978). Modification of the simplified amylase test for milled rice. Starch 30, 424–426. doi: 10.1002/star.19780301206
Ponce, K. S., Ye, G., and Zhao, X. (2018). QTL identification for cooking and eating quality in indica rice using multi-parent advanced generation intercross (magic) population. Front. Plant Sci. 9:868. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00868
Sabouri, A., Rabiei, B., Toorchi, M., Aharizad, S., and Ali, M. (2012). Mapping quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with cooking quality in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Aust. J. Crop Sci. 6, 808–814.
Septiningsih, E. M., Trijatmiko, K. R., Moeljopawiro, S., and McCouch, S. R. (2003). Identification of quantitative trait loci for yield and yield components in an advanced backcross population derived from the Oryza sativa Variety IR64 and the wild relative O. rufipogon. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107, 1419–1432. doi: 10.1007/s00122-003-1376-z
Su, Y., Rao, Y., Hu, S., Yang, Y., Gao, Z., Zhang, G., et al. (2011). Map-based cloning proves qGC-6, a major QTL for gel consistency of japonica/indica cross, responds by Waxy in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 123, 859–867. doi: 10.1007/s00122-011-1632-6
Sun, S.-Y., Hao, W., and Lin, H.-X. (2005). Identification of QTLs for cooking and eating quality of rice grain. Rice Sci. 13, 161–169.
Sun, Y., Yan, L., Dong, C., Wang, P., Huang, X., and Deng, X. (2005). Genetic relationship among Wx gene, AC, GC and GT of rice. Acta Agron. Sin. 31, 535–539.
Takeuchi, Y., Nonoue, Y., Ebitani, T., Suzuki, K., Aoki, N., Sato, H., et al. (2007). QTL detection for eating quality including glossiness, stickiness, taste and hardness of cooked rice. Breed. Sci. 57, 231–242. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.57.231
Tan, Y., Li, J., Yu, S., Xing, Y., Xu, C., and Zhang, Q. (1999). The three important traits for cooking and eating quality of rice grains are controlled by a single locus in an elite rice hybrid, Shanyou 63. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99, 642–648. doi: 10.1007/s001220051279
Tian, Z., Qian, Q., Liu, Q., Yan, M., Liu, X., Yan, C., et al. (2009). Allelic diversities in rice starch biosynthesis lead to a diverse array of rice eating and cooking qualities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 21760–21765. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912396106
Toyoshima, H., Okadome, H., Ohtsubo, K., Suto, M., Horisue, N., Inatsu, O., et al. (1997). Cooperative test on the small-scale rapid method for the gelatinization properties test of rice flours with a Rapid-Visco-Analyser (RVA). Nippon Shokuhin Kogakukaishi 44, 579–584. doi: 10.3136/nskkk.44.579
Tran, N. A., Daygon, V. D., Resurreccion, A. P., Cuevas, R. P., Corpuz, H. M., and Fitzgerald, M. A. (2011). A single nucleotide polymorphism in the Waxy gene explains a significant component of gel consistency. Theor. Appl. Genet. 123, 519–525. doi: 10.1007/s00122-011-1604-x
Umemoto, T., Yano, M., Satoh, H., Shomura, A., and Nakamura, Y. (2002). Mapping of a gene responsible for the difference in amylopectin structure between japonica-type and indica-type rice varieties. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104, 1–8. doi: 10.1007/s001220200000
Wang, L., Liu, W., Xu, Y., He, Y., Luo, L., Xing, Y., et al. (2007). Genetic basis of 17 traits and viscosity parameters characterizing the eating and cooking quality of rice grain. Theor. Appl. Genet. 115, 463–476. doi: 10.1007/s00122-007-0580-7
Yan, C., Li, X., Zhang, R., Sui, J., Liang, G., Shen, X., et al. (2005). Performance and inheritance of rice starch RVA profile characteristics. Rice Sci. 12, 39–47.
Yang, G., Yan, K., Wu, B., Wang, W., Gao, Y., and Zheng, C. (2012). Genomewide analysis of intronic microRNAs in rice and Arabidopsis. J. Genet. 91, 313–324. doi: 10.1007/s12041-012-0199-6
Yang, X., Xia, X., Zeng, Y., Nong, B., Zhang, Z., Wu, Y., et al. (2018). Identification of candidate genes for gelatinization temperature, gel consistency and pericarp color by GWAS in rice based on SLAF-sequencing. PLoS One 13:e0196690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196690
Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Shi, C., Bao, G., and Ye, S. (2002). Progress of study on genetics of cooking and nutrient quality. Plant Genet. Resour. 3, 51–55.
Zheng, Y., Yu, Y., Li, Z., Chen, G., Xia, M., and Que, B. (2018). Relationship between RVA profile characteristics and eating value of japonica two line hybrid rice in Northern China. China Rice 24, 49–54.
Keywords: cooking and eating quality, gel consistency, QTL analysis, fine mapping, rice
Citation: Zhang A, Gao Y, Li Y, Ruan B, Yang S, Liu C, Zhang B, Jiang H, Fang G, Ding S, Jahan N, Xie L, Dong G, Xu Z, Gao Z, Guo L and Qian Q (2020) Genetic Analysis for Cooking and Eating Quality of Super Rice and Fine Mapping of a Novel Locus qGC10 for Gel Consistency. Front. Plant Sci. 11:342. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00342
Received: 30 July 2019; Accepted: 06 March 2020;
Published: 24 March 2020.
Edited by:
Paul Christiaan Struik, Wageningen University & Research, NetherlandsReviewed by:
Jianmin Wan, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, ChinaKeisuke Nagai, Nagoya University, Japan
Copyright © 2020 Zhang, Gao, Li, Ruan, Yang, Liu, Zhang, Jiang, Fang, Ding, Jahan, Xie, Dong, Xu, Gao, Guo and Qian. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zhenyu Gao, gaozhenyu@caas.cn; Longbiao Guo, guolongbiao@caas.cn; Qian Qian, qianqian188@hotmail.com