Timothy J. Tranbarger
Mark L. Tucker
Jeremy A. Roberts
Shimon Meir- 1UMR DIADE, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier, France
- 2Soybean Genomics and Improvement Lab, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, USA
- 3Division of Plant Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- 4Deptartment of Postharvest Science of Fresh Produce, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet-Dagan, Israel
Editorial on the Research Topic
Plant Organ Abscission: From Models to Crops
The shedding of plant organs is a highly coordinated process essential for both vegetative and reproductive development (Addicott, 1982; Sexton and Roberts, 1982; Roberts et al., 2002; Leslie et al., 2007; Roberts and Gonzalez-Carranza, 2007; Estornell et al., 2013). Research with model plants, namely floral organ abscission in Arabidopsis and leaf, flower and fruit abscission of tomato, and seed shattering in rice has provided new insights in to the molecular mechanisms underlying abscission. However, little is known about how these mechanisms that take place in the abscission zone (AZ) have diversified during plant evolution and differs between species and plant families, and within diverse tissues and developmental contexts. A major aim of this topic was to examine diverse organ abscission examples from a wide range of species in order to provide a format for comparisons between model and important crop species.
To set the stage, the Topic was spearheaded by a timely mini review on seed shattering (Dong and Wang) and a review on tomato pedicel abscission (Ito and Nakano). Dong and Wang cover recent knowledge about dry fruit dehiscence in Arabidopsis, a model dicot, and some legumes compared to seed shattering in the model monocot rice and other cereal crops and also to pedicel abscission in tomato. The review provides an overview of the importance of AZ development as a common denominator for all organ abscission to occur, pointing out commonalities and gene neo-functionalization of MADS-box genes in particular that give rise to these different dispersal systems.
Tomato flower and leaf abscission are excellent model systems to study abscission in horticultural crops: (1) tomato abscission is well characterized at the anatomical, physiological and molecular levels, especially tomato flower abscission that has a distinct flower AZ (FAZ) at the midpoint of the pedicel; (2) tomato has a high-quality, well-annotated genome available; (3) tomato plants offer opportunities for functional analyses using Virus Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS), stable transformation and recently developed gene editing methodologies; and (4) ethylene and auxin interactions in tomato abscission are well documented, which makes tomato an excellent model system for comparison to abscission in other crops discussed in this topic series (Jiang et al., 2008; Meir et al., 2010; Ma et al., 2015). Ito and Nakano provide a mini-review that describes in detail the recent advances in research on the mechanisms regulating the formation of the tomato pedicel AZ, focusing on the role of the MADS-box family transcription factors that regulate pedicel-AZ development. The review also covers recent results from transcriptome analyses that identified pedicel AZ specific transcription factors (TFs) that connect abscission-inducing signals with abscission processes.
In the article by Sundaresan et al., a de novo AZ transcriptome assembly provides the functional annotation of transcripts expressed in the tomato FAZ and leaf AZ (LAZ) during abscission. The results from this study revealed distinct patterns of transcriptional regulation that occur in the FAZ and LAZ, and the identification of common and distinct TFs not previously related to abscission. The AZ-specific transcript information was utilized to design a robust customized AZ microarray chip with a greater number of transcript probes than any commercial chip, including probes designed in both sense and antisense direction that can be used to explore the expression of antisense transcripts (NATs). Kim et al. used this chip to identified prominent changes in gene expression in the tomato FAZ and LAZ, in addition to parallel analysis of the soybean leaf and Arabidopsis floral AZs, linked to cell wall disassembly and synthesis, and deposition of a waxy-like boundary layer that defines the fracture plane for organ separation. They proposed that abscission is an adaptation of a more primal organogenesis process occurring in the meristem. In addition, they propose that IDA (Inflorescence Deficient in Abscission) gene expression, which appears to be a common occurrence in abscission processes, may play a role in the synthesis of the boundary layer. Tsuchiya et al. used tomato to compare the pedicel AZ cell walls during flower and fruit abscission. They provide evidence that expansin and xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase (XTH) play important, but different roles in the FAZ during the flower abscission process, while no AZ-specific expansin and XTH expression was observed during fruit abscission, and that lignification occurred in the AZ of over-ripe tomato fruit pedicels.
The Arabidopsis floral organ abscission model was used to further explore the signaling mechanisms that control cell separation processes, with Groner et al. using suppression analysis to examine the allelic dependent restoration of organ abscission in the nev (NEVERSHED) mutant by specific alleles of CAST AWAY (CST). This work provides insight into allelic-specific interactions of key regulators of abscission, and provides a basis for nuanced applications to control abscission in crop plants. In addition, two articles focused on the Arabidopsis INFLORESCENCE DEFICIENT IN ABSCISSION (AtIDA) peptide ligand, and the leucine-rich repeat (LRR) receptor-like kinases (RLKs) HAESA (HAE) and HAESA-LIKE 2 abscission-signaling pathway (HSL2) (Jinn et al., 2000; Cho et al., 2008; Stenvik et al., 2008). In a Perspective article Estornell et al. investigated the functional conservation of the citrus IDA ortholog CitIDA3 by over expression in Arabidopsis wild-type and ida mutant plants. Their results demonstrated that overexpression of the CitIDA3 in wild-type Arabidopsis produced similar phenotypes as overexpression of AtIDA in wild-type Arabidopsis, which included shorter plants and siliques and early floral abscission; moreover, CitIDA3 rescued the abscission phenotype in the ida-2 mutant background, which provides evidence that the IDA-HAE/HSL2 abscission-signaling pathway is conserved in citrus. Furthermore, Stø et al. examined the IDA-HAE/HSL2 abscission-signaling pathway in Populus, a dicot tree, and palm (Elaeis guineensis), a monocot tree, and provide further evidence for conservation of function for this pathway, and that whole genome duplications gave rise to functionally divergent IDA-like (IDL) peptides during higher plant evolution. The results of these papers provide pertinent evidence that the IDA-HAE/HSL2 abscission-signaling pathway functions in higher plants in diverse phylogenetic groups. However, to what extent the IDA pathway regulates organ abscission in combination with other pathways in these species is still not clear.
Auxin and ethylene are well known to play inhibitory and positive roles, respectively, during organ abscission, and several articles further established their role during organ abscission of diverse species and organ types. Jin et al. examined the role of auxin transport during Populus leaf abscission and provided evidence that auxin transport is required to delay abscission and because the transport mechanism functions in the absence of ethylene signaling, auxin appears to act independent of ethylene on cell separation. Gao et al. performed a large-scale transcript profiling analysis during rose petal abscission, and identified the transcriptional control of important pathways in addition to 150 TFs that are differentially expressed during petal abscission in rose. In particular, down-regulation of the Aux/IAA gene RhIAA16 in rose promoted petal abscission, suggesting that RhIAA16 plays a negative regulatory role in rose petal abscission.
The role of ethylene was examined in four manuscripts, while one manuscript examined the involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) during the process of fruit abscission in tropical crop species. Taesakul et al. observed different ethylene sensitivities in two distinct AZs of the tropical Longkong (Lansium domesticum) fruit. One AZ is more sensitive to ethylene than another adjacent AZ, the later of which is proposed to allow animals to remove ripe fruit from the tree with minimal force without a requirement for ethylene. Hagemann et al. examined the role of ethylene signaling during ethephon (an ethylene-releasing compound) induced mango fruitlet abscission. Their findings suggest a role for novel versions of the Mango ethylene receptor MiERS1 expressed in the pedicel during premature fruit abscission. Ethylene perception in the fruitlet AZ is proposed to first reduce polar auxin transport capacity in the pedicel, followed by an up-regulation of ethylene receptors and finally a decrease in fruitlet sucrose content. Fruitlet abscission was also examined in litchi by Li et al., who performed a genome-wide digital transcript abundance analysis to identify genes regulated during ethephon-induced premature fruit abscission. The study gives insight into the major cellular processes transcriptionally regulated during ethephon-induced fruitlet abscission providing a host of candidate genes to target for control of abscission including those involved in ethylene biosynthesis and signaling, auxin transport and signaling, transcriptional regulation, protein ubiquitination, ROS response, calcium signal transduction, and cell wall modification. Yang et al. examined the involvement of ROS during the induction of longan (Dimocarpus longan Lour.) fruit abscission by carbon restriction caused through girdling, defoliation or detached fruit clusters. Their data suggest a role for H2O2 in the up-regulation of cellulase activity during fruit abscission, and that fruit abscission induced by carbohydrate stress is mediated by ROS. Cohen et al. examined a similar role for H2O2 in the rapid abscission of Azolla pinnata roots, and propose that metabolic products of nitrite and NO react with H2O2 in the apoplast that leads to free-radical-mediated cleavage of structural polysaccharides and the consequent rapid root abscission. Roongsattham et al. examined and compared the cellular processes that occur in the multi-cell layered boundary region AZ between the pedicel and mesocarp during ethylene induced ripe fruit abscission of the oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Their results highlight the dynamic developmental processes that occur in the AZ during oil palm fruit abscission, in particular changes to the pectin portion of the cell wall including a decrease in methylesterified homogalacturonan.
Flower abscission in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) induced independently by two contrasting abscission-inducing treatments: shade and gibberellic acid (GAc) was monitored (Domingos et al.). The results highlight specificities and common links in the metabolic pathways that control abscission by both inducers. While oxidative stress remediation mechanisms and a change in indolacetic acid (IAA) concentration across the AZ are common to the two abscission stimuli, GAc application and C-starvation induced abscission do not occur through the same metabolic pathways.
In the second Kim et al., a genome analysis identified 1,088 differentially regulated TFs in the soybean leaf AZ during abscission. Network analysis found that most TFs expressed early in abscission were linked to key determinants involved in the maintenance of organ polarity, lateral growth and cell fate, similar to what occurs during organogenesis in the meristem.
Hvoslef-Eide et al. compares the primary AZ in the seed funiculus of pea with the inducible secondary AZ in the poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima) flower pedicel. The comparative analysis yielded the identification of abscission specific genes expressed in both poinsettia flower pedicel and pea seed AZs, suggesting widespread conservation of function for these gene products during organ abscission.
Lada and MacDonald provide a Hypothesis and Theory article on postharvest needle abscission in the conifer Balsam Fir. They concluded that postharvest needle abscission cannot be prevented entirely; however, abscission related processes including ethylene and other pathways identified to be involved in abscission represent targets that may delay abscission.
Finally, Patterson et al. provided a Perspective article that explores the question whether the use of model organ abscission systems such as tomato and Arabidopsis will necessarily provide applications to alter abscission in non-model understudied crop species. Their opinion highlights the challenges to translate model derived knowledge to crop species, and that it is essential for breeders and molecular biologists to work together to provide an understanding of the unique development of each species as well as the targeted genes or pathways of interest.
Overall, the current topic series of articles covered abscission of different organs in a variety of plant species including both model plants and crops. In particular, one emerging example of a common mechanism is the IDA-HAE/HSL2 signaling pathway, which is present in the AZ of a variety of species and may interact with ethylene and auxin to regulate organ abscission in these species. Articles in this series provide further evidence that this pathway functions in plants from divergent evolutionary histories, including both monocot and dicot species. Importantly, a recent article corroborates further the conservation of this pathway in the tropical fruit species litchi (Ying et al., 2016). If indeed this pathway is universally plant kingdom wide, inhibition at critical points of the pathway may allow either elimination or at least delayed organ abscission in divergent crop species. One significant development for agriculturally important but less studied crop species that is observed in this series is the next generation sequencing (NGS) based transcriptome analysis that allows rapid validation of model derived gene candidates in addition to new resources to identify targets to manage abscission in particular species and insight into the regulatory processes that may be unique to divergent species.
Author Contributions
A draft of the Editorial was first written by TT and revised by MT, JR, and SM.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
Cho, S. K., Larue, C. T., Chevalier, D., Wang, H., Jinn, T. L., Zhang, S., et al. (2008). Regulation of floral organ abscission in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 15629–15634. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805539105
Estornell, L. H., Agustí, J., Merelo, P., Talón, M., and Tadeo, F. R. (2013). Elucidating mechanisms underlying organ abscission. Plant Sci. 199–200, 48–60. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.10.008
Jiang, C. Z., Lu, F., Imsabai, W., Meir, S., and Reid, M. S. (2008). Silencing polygalacturonase expression inhibits tomato petiole abscission. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 973–979. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern023
Jinn, T. L., Stone, J. M., and Walker, J. C. (2000). HAESA, an Arabidopsis leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase, controls floral organ abscission. Genes Dev. 14, 108–117. doi: 10.1101/gad.14.1.108
Leslie, M. E., Lewis, M. W., and Liljegren, S. J. (2007). “Organ abscission,” in Plant Cell Separation and Adhesion, eds J. A. Roberts and Z. Gonzalez-Carranza (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.), 106–136.
Ma, C., Meir, S., Xiao, L. T., Tong, J., Liu, Q., Reid, M. S., et al. (2015). A knotted1-like homeobox protein regulates abscission in tomato by modulating the auxin pathway. Plant Physiol. 167, 844–853. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.253815
Meir, S., Philosoph-Hadas, S., Sundaresan, S., Selvaraj, K. S., Burd, S., Ophir, R., et al. (2010). Microarray analysis of the abscission-related transcriptome in the tomato flower abscission zone in response to auxin depletion. Plant Physiol. 154, 1929–1956. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.160697
Roberts, J. A., Elliott, K. A., and Gonzalez-Carranza, Z. H. (2002). Abscission, dehiscence, and other cell separation processes. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 53, 131–158. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.092701.180236
Roberts, J. A., and Gonzalez-Carranza, Z. (eds.). (2007). “Cell separation and adhesion processes in plants,” in Plant Cell Separation and Adhesion (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.), 1–7.
Sexton, R., and Roberts, J. A. (1982). Cell biology of abscission. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 33, 133–162. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.33.060182.001025
Stenvik, G. E., Tandstad, N. M., Guo, Y., Shi, C. L., Kristiansen, W., Holmgren, A., et al. (2008). The EPIP peptide of INFLORESCENCE DEFICIENT IN ABSCISSION is sufficient to induce abscission in Arabidopsis through the receptor-like kinases HAESA and HAESA-LIKE2. Plant Cell 20, 1805–1817. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.059139
Keywords: organ abscission, abscission zone, ethylene, auxin, signaling, tomato, Arabidopsis, fruit crops
Citation: Tranbarger TJ, Tucker ML, Roberts JA and Meir S (2017) Editorial: Plant Organ Abscission: From Models to Crops. Front. Plant Sci. 8:196. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00196
Received: 25 January 2017; Accepted: 01 February 2017;
Published: 14 February 2017.
Edited and reviewed by: Diego Rubiales, Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible (CSIC), Spain
Copyright © 2017 Tranbarger, Tucker, Roberts and Meir. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Timothy J. Tranbarger, dGltb3RoeS50cmFuYmFyZ2VyQGlyZC5mcg==