
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CORRECTION article
Front. Plant Sci. , 19 December 2016
Sec. Plant Physiology
Volume 7 - 2016 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01888
This article is part of the Research Topic Aquaporins: dynamic role and regulation View all 15 articles
This article is a correction to:
Increased Permeability of the Aquaporin SoPIP2;1 by Mercury and Mutations in Loop A
A corrigendum on
Increased Permeability of the Aquaporin SoPIP2;1 by Mercury and Mutations in Loop A
by Kirscht A., Survery S., Kjellbom P., and Johanson U. (2016) Front. Plant Sci. 7:1249. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01249
In our Original Research article it was incorrectly stated that cadmium and mercury have a similar preference for hexagonal coordination. Although both cadmium and mercury can bind at octahedral (not hexagonal) coordination sites their coordination preferences are not similar (Rulisek and Vondrasek, 1998). Hence, the fourth sentence under the subheading “Mercury Binding Site” in the Discussion should read: “It is described as a second binding site for cadmium, but given the comparable size of the cations and that both are capable of forming an octahedral coordination geometry (Rulisek and Vondrasek, 1998), one could imagine that also mercury has a potential to bind.” The authors apologize for the mistake. This error does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Keywords: aquaporin, water channel, major intrinsic protein, Spinacia oleracea, tryptophan fluorescence
Citation: Kirscht A, Survery S, Kjellbom P and Johanson U (2016) Corrigendum: Increased Permeability of the Aquaporin SoPIP2;1 by Mercury and Mutations in Loop A. Front. Plant Sci. 7:1888. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01888
Received: 21 November 2016; Accepted: 30 November 2016;
Published: 19 December 2016.
Edited and reviewed by: Rupesh Kailasrao Deshmukh, Laval University, Canada
Copyright © 2016 Kirscht, Survery, Kjellbom and Johanson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Urban Johanson, dXJiYW4uam9oYW5zb25AYmlvY2hlbWlzdHJ5Lmx1LnNl
†Shared first authors.
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.