Gregory G. Brown
Catherine Colas des Francs-Small
Oren Ostersetzer-Biran- 1Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- 2ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- 3Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, The Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
Group II introns are large catalytic RNAs (ribozymes) which are found in bacteria and organellar genomes of several lower eukaryotes, but are particularly prevalent within the mitochondrial genomes (mtDNA) in plants, where they reside in numerous critical genes. Their excision is therefore essential for mitochondria biogenesis and respiratory functions, and is facilitated in vivo by various protein cofactors. Typical group II introns are classified as mobile genetic elements, consisting of the self-splicing ribozyme and its intron-encoded maturase protein. A hallmark of maturases is that they are intron specific, acting as cofactors which bind their own cognate containing pre-mRNAs to facilitate splicing. However, the plant organellar introns have diverged considerably from their bacterial ancestors, such as they lack many regions which are necessary for splicing and also lost their evolutionary related maturase ORFs. In fact, only a single maturase has been retained in the mtDNA of various angiosperms: the matR gene encoded in the fourth intron of the NADH-dehydrogenase subunit 1 (nad1 intron 4). Their degeneracy and the absence of cognate ORFs suggest that the splicing of plant mitochondria introns is assisted by trans-acting cofactors. Interestingly, in addition to MatR, the nuclear genomes of angiosperms also harbor four genes (nMat 1-4), which are closely related to maturases and contain N-terminal mitochondrial localization signals. Recently, we established the roles of two of these paralogs in Arabidopsis, nMAT1 and nMAT2, in the splicing of mitochondrial introns. In addition to the nMATs, genetic screens led to the identification of other genes encoding various factors, which are required for the splicing and processing of mitochondrial introns in plants. In this review we will summarize recent data on the splicing and processing of mitochondrial introns and their implication in plant development and physiology, with a focus on maturases and their accessory splicing cofactors.
Plant Mitochondrial Genomes (mtDNAs)
Mitochondria in plants house the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) machinery and many other essential metabolic pathways (for review see Millar et al., 2011). The vast majority of the proteins responsible for these processes, as well as those that participate in the biogenesis of the organelle (e.g., the translocons involved in protein import) are encoded in the nuclear genome. A small number of essential proteins, however, are encoded in the organelle's own genome. In vascular plants these genomes (mitochondrial DNAs, or mtDNAs) are much larger and more variable in size than the mtDNAs of other organisms and also display an array of other unique features (Knoop, 2012). The mtDNAs in plants encode tRNAs, rRNAs, ribosomal proteins, subunits of the respiratory machinery, including NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase (complex I), the cytochrome bc1 complex (complex III), cytochrome c oxidase (complex IV), ATP-synthase (complex V), and several other proteins involved in cytochrome c biogenesis and the twin-arginine protein translocation (Unseld et al., 1997; Kubo et al., 2000; Adams et al., 2002; Notsu et al., 2002; Handa, 2003; Clifton et al., 2004; Ogihara et al., 2005; Sugiyama et al., 2005). The mitochondrial translation machinery and energy transduction complexes are composed of both nuclear and organellar encoded subunits, thus necessitating complex mechanisms for the coordination of the expression of these two physically distinct genomes.
The expression of mitochondrial genes in plants is regulated primarily at the post-transcriptional level (Finnegan and Brown, 1990; Binder and Brennicke, 2003). The primary transcripts in plant mitochondria undergo extensive processing, including the nucleolytic maturation of 5' and 3' termini, RNA editing (C-to-U changes in angiosperms), and the splicing of numerous introns which lie within genes encoding proteins required for both organellar gene expression and respiration (Gagliardi and Binder, 2007; Bonen, 2008; Takenaka et al., 2008). These processes are necessary for these RNAs to carry out their functions in protein synthesis and are accomplished largely by nuclear-encoded factors, which may also provide a means to link organellar functions with environmental and/or developmental signals (see Figure 1).
Figure 1. Nuclear genes control the mitochondria biogenesis. Nuclear-encoded genes are necessary for the expression of mitochondrial genes, including transcription, pre-mRNA processing, translation of the mRNAs into mitochondrial proteins, the assembly of ribosomes and respiratory complexes, and are also required for the targeting and degradation of organellar subunits. Plant organelles are excellent systems to study these processes in eukaryotes.
In this review, we will summarize recent progress on the splicing of mitochondrial group II introns in angiosperms, with emphasis on RNA maturases and several other accessory factors.
Group II Introns
Introns within organellar genomes in plants belong to group I and group II (Michel et al., 1989; Bonen and Vogel, 2001; Zimmerly et al., 2001; Lambowitz and Zimmerly, 2004; Bonen, 2008). The vast majority of mitochondrial introns in angiosperms are classified as group II intron RNAs (Bonen, 2008). Introns in this class have been identified in prokaryotes, where they are relatively rare, and in the mitochondria of fungi, protists and a few primitive metazoans and in chloroplasts. Group II introns are particularly prevalent, however, in the mtDNAs in vascular plants (Malek and Knoop, 1998; Bonen and Vogel, 2001; Belfort et al., 2002; Bonen, 2008; Lambowitz and Zimmerly, 2011). These large introns are defined mainly by their capacity to fold into a conserved secondary structure of six domains (DI–DVI) extending from a central hub (Michel and Ferat, 1995; Qin and Pyle, 1998). Such intron structure models were later supported by a crystal structure of a self-spliced group II intron from Oceanobacillus iheyensis, further showing that multiple interactions between the different domains are indeed required to stabilize the tertiary structure of group II introns into their catalytically active forms (Toor et al., 2008). Figure 2A represents a secondary structure model of plant mitochondria group II intron RNAs.
Figure 2. Secondary structure model of plant mitochondrial group II introns. (A) The secondary structure of group II introns is characterized by six double-helical domains (I-VI), arising from a central hub. Each subdomain of DI and DII, DIII, DIV, DV, and DVI are outlined within the structure. All plant mitochondrial intron structures in angiosperms are classified as standard group IIA RNAs (Bonen, 2008). The conserved bulged-A residue in DVI, the exon-intron binding sites (i.e., EBS1/IBS1 and EBS2/IBS2), and tertiary interactions between different intron regions (indicated by roman letters) are shown in the model structure. The ORF encoding the MatR protein in nad1 intron 4 is encoded in intron domain IV. (B) Splicing pathway of the autocatalytic group II introns occurs by a two-step trans-esterification pathway. In the first step of the branching pathway, the 2'-OH group of the branch point adenosine nucleophilically attacks the phosphate at the 5'-splice site. The 5'-exon is released and the attacking adenosine adopts a 2',5'-branched structure that gives the intron a lariat form. Yet, in addition to this classical “branch-point” splicing reaction, some mitochondrial introns which lacks a DVI bulged A are excised as linear molecules which are generated by a “hydrolytic-pathway” of splicing (Li-Pook-Than and Bonen, 2006).
Splicing Mechanism
The splicing of group II introns is mechanistically identical to that of the nuclear spliceosomal introns. Splicing is initiated through a trans-esterification involving a nucleophilic attack on the 5' splice site by the 2' hydroxyl group of an adenosine residue in domain VI (see Figure 2B). This results in the formation of a free 3' hydroxyl at the 5' splice site and a lariat shaped intermediate. In a second trans-esterification step, the flanking exons are joined when the free 3' hydroxyl at the 5' splice site forms a 5'-3' phosphodiester bond with the nucleotide at the 3' splice site; the intron is then finally released as a lariat. An alternative splicing reaction involves the “hydrolytic pathway,” where a water molecule acts as the nucleophile in the first step and cleaves the 5'-exon from the intron without forming a branched structure (Daniels et al., 1996). The second step of splicing is identical to the “branched-point” reaction; the 3'-terminal OH group of the 5'-exon attacks the phosphate at the 3'-splice site, thereby splicing the exons and releasing the intron as a linear form. The presence of both linear and circular forms of excised intron molecules in plant mitochondria points to multiple novel group II splicing mechanisms in vivo (Li-Pook-Than and Bonen, 2006).
Because some group II introns can splice auto-catalytically, their splicing, and by extension the splicing of nuclear spliceosomal introns, can be considered to be an example of RNA-mediated catalysis. The conditions required for in vitro splicing are generally non-physiological and most, if not all, group II introns require proteins for splicing in vivo.
Few organellar introns, and the majority of prokaryotic group II introns, can function as “homing” retroelements that insert themselves into related genomic sites (Cousineau et al., 1998; Lambowitz and Zimmerly, 2004). This process is mediated through the association of the intron with a specific reverse transcriptase (RT) encoded within the domain IV of the intron itself, termed as maturases (see below and Figure 2). In general, the interaction between the maturase and its cognate group II intron is critical for both splicing and mobility (Lambowitz and Zimmerly, 2004).
Interestingly, many plant organellar group II introns lack an ORF capable of specifying a maturase, or they encode a degenerate maturase protein which is probably unable to promote intron mobility (Michel et al., 1989; Bonen and Vogel, 2001; Zimmerly et al., 2001; Barkan, 2004; Lambowitz and Zimmerly, 2004; Bonen, 2008). These introns must therefore rely on other cofactors to facilitate their splicing in vivo (see below). Group II introns have not yet been identified in the nuclear genomes of eukaryotes, but their predicted descendants (i.e., the spliceosomal introns and retrotransposons), are highly abundant in eukaryotes, comprising together more than half of the genome in mammals.
Cis- and Trans-Splicing
In prokaryotes, group II introns are often found near genes or after rho elements (Dai et al., 2003), and are thus expected to be expressed at low levels and to have only little effect on bacteria fitness. By contrast, the mitochondrial introns in plants are commonly (if not exclusively) found within the coding regions of various genes required for both genome expression and energy transduction (Bonen and Vogel, 2001). Structure-wise, some of the organellar introns in plants have diverged considerably from their bacterial ancestors and have lost elements considered to be essential for splicing (Bonen and Vogel, 2001; Bonen, 2008). Accordingly, none of the mitochondrial introns in angiosperms has been found to self-splice in vitro. Moreover, several of the mitochondrial introns in plants (i.e., nad 1 introns 1 and 3, nad2 intron 2, and nad5 introns 3 and 4; Table 1) are fragmented in that they are transcribed as separate RNAs, which must assemble in trans through base-pairing interactions to form a splicing-competent structure (Chapdelaine and Bonen, 1991; Knoop et al., 1991; Pereira de Souza et al., 1991; Malek and Knoop, 1998; Bonen and Vogel, 2001; Bonen, 2008). In addition to nad1, nad2, and nad5, fragmentation of group II introns can be also observed in various other introns, as in the cases of the fourth intron in nad1 in tobacco and rice and cox2 intron in onion (Bonen, 2008; Kim and Yoon, 2010). The trans-spliced group II introns in plants are typically bipartite in structure, with their fragmentation sites occurring within the introns domain IV. Interestingly, this situation is reminiscent of the trans-interaction of snRNAs of the spliceosome with substrate pre-mRNAs, which replicates certain features of the group II introns (Sharp, 1985; Pyle and Lambowitz, 1999). This is discussed in greater detail below.
Table 1. Mitochondrial group II introns and their identified splicing factors in higher plants.
Mis-Splicing
The nad5 gene in most angiosperms contains four group II introns, of which the second and third flank a small, 22 bp exon and splice in “trans.” The formation of a mature nad5 mRNA therefore involves the production of three independently transcribed transcripts and two distinct RNA-RNA associations through which the functional second and third introns assemble and splice. Analysis of partially spliced products generated when only one of the two trans-splicing events had occurred, revealed that these reactions must take place in a particular sequence (see Figure 3). When the splicing of the third intron precedes that of the second, a properly trans-spliced intermediate is formed that is competent to correctly engage in the other trans-splicing event. If the two portions of the second intron associate prior to the removal of the third intron, however, in a number of monocot and dicot plants, including plants of the Arabidopsis, Brassica, Beta, Zea, and Triticum genera, a variety of mis-spliced products are generated in which the correct 3' splice site is joined to any of a number of sites present in exon b (Elina and Brown, 2010). A model to explain these surprising results was formulated based on the observation that the 3' end of the portion of the third intron co-transcribed with exon c contained a sequence that was potentially capable of forming an extended duplex with the first exon. It was proposed that when the initial base-pairing interactions between the two portions of the second intron occurred, the sequences from the third intron and exon a annealed. This interaction sterically hindered the 3' splice site from assuming a position where it could join the correct 5' splice site; instead the 3' splice site joined to a variety of alternative sites within the upstream exon.
Figure 3. Model for mis-splicing of mitochondrial group II introns. A schematic illustration of a model for the splicing and mis-splicing of angiosperm nad5 transcripts based on the model of Elina and Brown (2010). The cis-splicing of introns 1 and 4 proceeds normally. If the trans-splicing intron 3 assembles prior to the assembly of the trans-splcing intron 2, it splices correctly, and intron 2 can assemble and splice correctly to generate a properly spliced and functional mRNA. If intron 2 assembles first, however, a sequence at the 3' end of intron 3a (the portion of the intron co-transcribed with exon c) base pairs with a sequence within exon a, preventing correct positioning of the 5' splice site of intron 2. This results in the joining of exon c to sites within exon b to form mis-spliced, non-functional transcripts composed of exon a, a portion of exon b, exon c, and intron 3a; these transcripts do not engage in further splicing. A hybrid lariat mis-splicing product composed of intron 2 and a portion of exon b is also formed.
In plants of the genus Oenothera, the third nad5 intron is further split, and requires the assembly of three separate transcripts to form a splicing-competent form (Knoop et al., 1997). In this case, the portion of the third intron predicted to base pair with the first exon “a” is not present on the same RNA as the 3' splice site of the second intron. Accordingly, mis-splicing of the second intron would be predicted to not take place, and this expectation was confirmed through the analysis of partially spliced products. Thus, the problem of intron 2 mis-splicing that was generated during the first evolutionary fragmentation of intron 3 was resolved through a second fragmentation. As discussed below, these findings may provide some insight into the evolutionary pressures that may have driven the evolution of the spliceosome from a group II intron in early evolving eukaryotes.
Group II Intron Splicing Factors
Proteins which facilitate the splicing of group II introns have probably originated in two ways (Lambowitz et al., 1999; Barkan, 2004; Fedorova et al., 2010): some are encoded within the introns themselves (Intron Encoded Proteins, or maturases) and have ancient relationships with their host introns, whereas others are derived “more recently” from the nuclear genome.
Maturases
Maturases are characterized by three functional domains, which are required for both splicing and intron mobility activities: an N-terminal RT that is related to HIV-RTs, followed by an RNA-binding and splicing motif (domain X) and a site-specific endonuclease (D/En) motif at the C-terminus. Genetic and biochemical data show that the processing of group II introns in bacteria is facilitated by a single maturase-ORF encoded within DIV of the intron itself (see Figure 2A), although in some cases the maturase may also act on additional closely-related RNAs. The best characterized maturase to-date is LtrA protein, which binds with high affinity and specifically to its own intron, the self-splicing Ll.LtrB intron (Wank et al., 1999; Matsuura et al., 2001; Noah and Lambowitz, 2003). These assays indicated that the binding of LtrA facilitates LtrB splicing and folding under physiological conditions and is required for intron retrohoming.
MatR
As outlined above, group II introns have diverged considerably from bacteria and plant organellar genomes. These introns in plants sometime lack regions which are considered to be essential for their splicing. Also, the number of maturases has been dramatically reduced during the evolution of organellar genomes in plants. The mitochondrial genomes of bryophytes, as Marchantia polymorpha and Physcomitrella patens, contain a few maturase ORFs, while only a single intron has retained its maturase gene in the mtDNAs in angiosperms: the matR gene encoded within nad1 intron 4 (Wahleithner et al., 1990) (Figures 1,3). MatR proteins contain a well-conserved domain X, but have degenerate RT motifs and lack the En domain (Figure 4). The high conservation of MatR across the plant lineage (Adams et al., 2002) and RNA-editing events which restore conserved amino-acids (Thomson et al., 1994) suggest that matR encodes a functional protein. Preliminary data suggest that MatR binds to several group II introns in vivo, but its putative roles in splicing are yet to be determined. Analogously, MatK protein, encoded within trnK gene in chloroplasts, is associated with numerous group II introns in vivo (Zoschke et al., 2010). Besides MatR there are no splicing factor candidates among the ORFs of angiosperm mitochondrial genomes (although some lower plants may contain a few maturase ORFs in the mtDNAs). The splicing of mitochondrial introns in plants is therefore expected to be facilitated by nuclear-encoded proteins. These are translated by cytosolic ribosomes and subsequently imported into the organelle.
Figure 4. Plant mitochondria maturases. Plant maturase ORFs are shown as rectangles, with different shadings indicating conserved regions. The three domains typical to group II intron encoded maturases are outlined in the maturase ORFs: A reverse transcriptase (RT); domain X, associated with maturase activity; D, DNA-binding and endonuclease domain (D/En). The organelle-encoded MatR and MatK proteins contain a well conserved domain X, but have degenerate RT motifs and lack the En domain. In angiosperms, four other maturase-related proteins, denoted as nMAT 1–4, are encoded by nuclear genes, but have N-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequences (Keren et al., 2009). Similarly to MatR, the four nMATs have a conserved domain X, but show deviations in the RT domain and lack (type I) or have deviations in the D/En domain (type II), suggesting loss of mobility functions.
Nuclear-encoded maturases (nMATs)
In addition to matR, plants also contain several genes designated nMat 1 to 4, which are closely related to group II intron-encoded maturases and exist in the nucleus as self-standing ORFs, out of the context of their evolutionary related group II intron hosts (Mohr and Lambowitz, 2003; Keren et al., 2009). These are all predicted to reside within mitochondria and are thus expected to function in the splicing of organellar introns in plants. GFP-fusion analyses further established the mitochondrial localization of the four nuclear-encoded maturases in vivo in Arabidopsis, but also indicated a possible dual localization (in chloroplasts and mitochondria) for nMAT4 (Keren et al., 2009). Based on their topology and predicted evolutionary origins, the four nMATs are classified into two main groups (Figure 4): nMAT1 and nMAT2 are classified as type-I maturases, which lack the D/En motif, while nMAT3 and nMAT4 belong to type-II and contain all three domains (i.e., RT, X, and En/D) typical to “model” group II intron maturases (Mohr and Lambowitz, 2003). Yet, while the RT regions in nMAT1 and nMAT2 are degenerate, the D/En domains in nMAT3 and nMAT4 have mutations that are expected to inactivate the endonuclease activity (Mohr and Lambowitz, 2003). Thus, although expected to retain their splicing activities, the four nuclear-encoded maturases in angiosperms seem to have lost their mobility-associated functions.
Genetic studies indicate that nMAT proteins function in the splicing of mitochondrial introns in angiosperms (Nakagawa and Sakurai, 2006; Keren et al., 2009, 2012) and Table 1). In Arabidopsis, they seem particularly important for the maturation of primary nad1 transcripts (see Table 1). Homozygote nmat mutants show altered growth and developmental phenotypes, modified respiration and altered stress responses, which are tightly correlated with mitochondrial complex I defects (Keren et al., 2009, 2012). While nMAT1 is required in trans-splicing of nad1 intron 1, nad2 intron 1, and nad4 intron 2 (Keren et al., 2012), nMAT2 functions in the efficient splicing of nad1 intron 2, nad7 intron 1 and the single intron in the cytochrome oxidase subunit 2 gene (cox2 intron 1) (Keren et al., 2009). Interestingly, the three intron targets of nMAT1 are all lacking the canonical bulged A residue, which is required for the first trans-esterification step and the release of the 5'-exon (see above and Figure 2). The precise biochemical functions of nuclear-encoded maturases in the splicing process have not yet been established, but an intriguing possibility is that nMAT1 may function in the hydrolysis of the phosphodiester bond at the 5' splice site, or recruit specific RNA nucleases required for the release of the 5'-exon. Similar to nMAT1 and nMAT2, studies in progress suggest that MatR nMAT3 and nMAT4 also play a role in the splicing of mitochondrial introns.
Maturase phylogeny
A recent study by Guo and Mower (2013) has provided new insights into the distribution and the evolution of land-plant maturases. The authors used known plant maturase sequences to conduct an extensive search of recently sequenced green algal and land-plant mitochondrial genomes, including those of the sequenced nuclear genomes of the lycophyte Selaginella and the moss Physcomitrella. The authors detected multiple, previously unrecognized plant sequences potentially cable of specifying a protein with maturase function. These included seven new nuclear maturase loci in Selaginella (bringing the total number of maturases for this species to eight), and five new nuclear maturase loci in Physcomitrella (bringing its total to 12). Building upon this new information a comprehensive phylogeny was constructed to determine the evolutionary relationships among the different maturase sequences; a simplified version of this phylogeny, displaying only the relationships among the seed plant (six maturase genes), Marchantia (eight related genes) and Selaginella maturases, is shown in Figure 5. Most, but not all of the new nMATs are predicted to be mitochondrial proteins.
Figure 5. A comparative sequence analysis of plant maturases. Phylogentic relationships among seed plant, Selaginella and Marchantia mitochondrial, chloroplast and identified nuclear maturases, based on Guo and Mower (2013). Nomenclature of Guo and Mower (2013) is used for mitochondrial maturases other than matR (designated by the authors as mat-nad1i728). Nomenclature for nuclear maturases (nMats) is identical with that employed in this review and previous analyses (Mohr and Lambowitz, 2003; Keren et al., 2009). Branch lengths, as illustrated, do not represent phylogenetic distances and are intended only to illustrate relationships among orthologous mat genes in plants. Mitochondrially encoded genes are shown as gray shaded boxes and chloroplast matK is in green, while orange shaded boxes represent plant maturase homologs.
Several interesting features of plant maturase evolution are revealed by this phylogeny. In general, plant mat genes fall into two main categories (Figure 5): mitochondria-encoded maturases which have no homologs in other plants (group A) and orthologous maturase-genes, found in the mitochondrial and/or nuclear genomes of different plants (group B). These can be further divided into four groups (i.e., matR sequences in land plants, type I and type II maturases and plastidial matK ORF in trnK intron). It is likely, therefore, that the angiosperm type I nMat1 and nMat2 genes resulted from a nuclear gene duplication, following the translocation to the nucleus of a single mitochondrial maturase related to Marchantia maturase mat-Mpo1 (formerly designated rtl, for RT-like) (Figure 5). It is further likely that three gene duplication events in the Selaginella lineage following the same translocation event led to four of the Selaginella nMats. As many mitochondrial genes, which were copied to a nuclear genome, the “original” mitochondrion-encoded Mpo1 ORF probably degenerated rapidly, resulting in the gene persisting only in the nucleus. Similarly, the type II nMat3 and nMat4 genes in angiosperms likely arose from a gene duplication event following the transfer to the nucleus of a maturase resembling modern Marchantia mat-cobi84 (see Figure 5); this event also resulted in the single Selaginella nuclear maturase nMat6. Interestingly, the matR maturases appear most similar to the Marchantia mat-cox1i44, suggesting common matures ancestor for these two maturases. Of particular interest is the observation that matK, the single maturase encoded in the chloroplast genome, clusters with mitochondrial maturases from group B, suggesting the possible transfer of a mitochondrial intron to the chloroplast in an ancestor of modern land plants and charophyte algae. Although branch support for the position of the matK clade was considered weak (Guo and Mower, 2013), this possibility was also suggested in an earlier analysis of matK phylogeny (Hausner et al., 2006).
Host-Encoded Factors in Plant Mitochondria
Different RNA-binding proteins were shown to function in the splicing and processing of introns in plant organellar genomes (see below). Some, such as a DEAD RNA-helicase (PMH2) and a CRM-domain protein (mCSF1) are required for optimal splicing of a large set of introns, whereas others (e.g., PPR, PORR, and RCC proteins) rather appear to be specific for a single, or few, individual introns. Although this review focuses mainly on maturases, this section summarizes the information available about other types of mitochondrial group II intron splicing factors.
CRM
CRM (Chloroplast RNA splicing and ribosome Maturation) proteins are characterized by a conserved RNA-binding domain of ~10 kDa (Pfam-PF01985), which is related to a conserved bacterial ORF (YhbY) (Barkan et al., 2007). In E.coli, YhbY is mainly associated with the maturation of the pre-50S ribosomal subunit (Barkan et al., 2007). In eukaryotes, CRMs are restricted to the plant lineage, where they are found in a small family of proteins containing between 1 and 4 repeats of the conserved CRM domain (Barkan et al., 2007). Biochemical analyses indicated that CRM domains share structural similarities and RNA-binding characteristics with the RNA recognition motif (RRM) (Keren et al., 2008). The nuclear genomes in angiosperms contain ~15 CRM proteins, of which the majority are predicted to be plastidial by different targeting prediction programs, although few may exist within the mitochondria and nucleus as well (Barkan et al., 2007). Two of these paralogs in Arabidopsis, mCSF1 and mCSF2, are targeted to mitochondria in vivo (Zmudjak et al., 2013). Genetic and biochemical data indicate that mCSF1 encodes an essential polypeptide which is required for the processing of many of the mitochondrial introns in Arabidopsis (Zmudjak et al., 2013). Accordingly, RNAi-knockdown mcsf1 lines show strong defects in the assembly of both complex I and complex IV (Zmudjak et al., 2013). No other mitochondrial CRM domain protein has been described so far, but other mitochondrial CRM members are expected to have important roles in RNA metabolism in higher plant mitochondria.
RNA DEAD-box helicases
RNA helicases from the DEAD-box family are widely distributed in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes and have essential roles in RNA processing. These include ATP-dependent RNA duplex unwinding and/or formation, displacement of proteins from RNA transcripts, formation of assembly platforms for larger ribonucleoprotein complexes, and also the sensing of bacterial metabolites (Putnam and Jankowsky, 2013). These processes are fundamental steps in RNA metabolism in all organisms. About 60 such DEAD-box encoding genes have been identified in plants, but most have not yet been characterized. One of these members in Arabidopsis, PMH2 (Putative Mitochondrial Helicase 2), is found in a large ribonucleoprotein complex in vivo, and is thought to be a hetero-multimeric splicing unit (Matthes et al., 2007; Köhler et al., 2010). Although the activities of PMH2 are not essential for the maturation of the mitochondrial pre-mRNAs, homozygous pmh2 mutants in Arabidopsis are affected in the splicing efficiency of many organelle introns, as evident by increased levels of many pre-mRNAs in pmh2 mutant mitochondria.
PPR proteins
PPR proteins (Small and Peeters, 2000) are found in most eukaryotes, but are in particularly abundant in plants, with nearly 500 different members the nuclear genomes of both monocot and dicot species (Lurin et al., 2004). Many, if not all, of the characterized PPR proteins in plants were shown to be involved in post-transcriptional RNA processing events in mitochondria and chloroplasts, including RNA editing, trimming, RNA stability, and more recently also in the removal of introns (Schmitz-Linneweber and Small, 2008). PPR proteins which function in the splicing of mitochondrial pre-mRNAs include OTP43 (Falcon de Longevialle et al., 2007), BIR6 (Koprivova et al., 2010), and ABO5 (Liu et al., 2010), all dealing with transcripts encoding subunits of the respiratory complex I (see Table 1).
Based on their topology and number of repeats, the PPR family is divided into two major classes, P and PLS (Lurin et al., 2004). In angiosperms, the splicing factors, together with several other PPR proteins which function in RNA stability and protection, belong to the P subclass and identified as “pure” PPR proteins, while editing factors are generally PLS domain proteins containing additional C-terminal domains (Schmitz-Linneweber and Small, 2008). Other P-class factors, which are predicted to reside within mitochondria, are therefore anticipated to function in the splicing of mitochondrial pre-mRNAs. However, PPR proteins belonging to the PLS class may also be involved in group II intron splicing in angiosperm mitochondria, as shown in Arabidopsis chloroplasts (OTP70, E subfamily) (Chateigner-Boutin et al., 2011) and the splicing of the mitochondrial cox1 transcript in Physcomitrella patens by PpPPR_43 (a DYW subclass PPR protein) (Ichinose et al., 2012). Recently, the code of RNA recognition by PPR proteins was deciphered (Barkan et al., 2012; Yagi et al., 2013), and was further established by structural data (Yin et al., 2013). Accordingly, systematic bioinformatics studies provide a powerful tool for molecular characterization of the roles additional PPRs in mitochondria RNA metabolism in plants.
PORR domain family
In addition to known RNA-binding proteins, genetic studies also led to the identification of novel factors which function in the processing of group II introns in plant organelles. Among these is the PORR (Plant Organellar RNA Recognition) domain which is represented in a small family of proteins in angiosperms (15 in Arabidopsis and 17 in rice) (Kroeger et al., 2009). One of these members in maize is associated with different group II introns in vivo and was shown to promote the splicing of about half of the plastid introns (Kroeger et al., 2009). In contrast, a mitochondrial member of the family, WTF9, is more specific and was shown to act on two group II introns, namely the essential ribosomal rpl2 subunit and ccmFC (encoding a subunit of the c-type cytochrome maturation system) (Colas des Francs-Small et al., 2012). Interestingly, homozygous Arabidopsis wtf9 lines are viable, possibly because the rpl2 transcript has been “split” during its evolution and is encoded in two parts, one of which is nuclear- encoded in Arabidopsis (Colas des Francs-Small et al., 2012). Thus, the lack of splicing of the mitochondrial rpl2 transcript leads to a partially functional Rpl2 protein. The strong phenotypes of the wtf9 mutants were therefore mainly attributed to the depletion of cytc and cytc1, and subsequently to complex III and complex IV defects (Colas des Francs-Small et al., 2012).
RCC proteins
Another factor involves a eukaryotic protein (RCC1, Regulator of Chromosome Condensation) which binds to chromatin and interacts with the nuclear Ran GTPase (Dasso, 1993). Similarly to PPRs, RCC proteins also contain tandem repeats of a conserved domain of about 50 amino acids. The association of RCC1 with Ran is postulated to be important in the regulation of nuclear gene expression. Only one member of the RCC1 domain family, RUG3, has been identified so far as a splicing factor. RUG3 is closely related to RCC1 and UV-B RESISTANCE 8, which were shown to function in chromatin modification. The RUG3 protein is involved in the splicing of nad2 in Arabidopsis (Kühn et al., 2011). Similar to other complex I mutants, rug3 knockout lines show slow growth and reduced size. As no RNA-binding was demonstrated for RCC1-like proteins, it has been proposed that these factors may recruit RNA-binding cofactors, such as the ABO5 protein (Liu et al., 2010; Kühn et al., 2011), to the splicing complex.
In addition to the identified factors, a nuclear mutation in Nicotiana sylvestris (nms1) was shown to disrupt the splicing of the first intron in the nad4 transcript (Brangeon et al., 2000), however the identity of this gene remains unknown. The specific roles of these factors in the splicing and processing of mitochondrial group II introns are illustrated in Figure 6.
Figure 6. The splicing of individual group II introns in Arabidopsis mitochondria is facilitated by multiple protein cofactors. Genetic and biochemical data indicate that mitochondrial splicing factors are essential for organellar functions and thus for plant survival. These analyses, involving selected mutants in various nuclear-encoded mitochondrial splicing factors, also indicate that the processing of individual mitochondrial introns in plant is facilitated by multiple protein cofactors. The different mitochondrial introns in angiosperms and their specific splicing factors are indicated in the figure. Colors refer to different protein families, while the shaded boxes indicate preliminary biochemical and genetic data in Arabidopsis.
Physiological Consequences of Mitochondrial Group II Intron Splicing Defects
The challenges of maintaining prokaryotic-type structures and functions in the cell are common to all eukaryotes. The respiratory chain is composed of four major complexes, complexes I to IV, which are localized within the mitochondrial inner-membrane. These complexes contain subunits encoded by both nuclear and mtDNAs. A miscommunication between the organelles and their host cell (i.e., a breakdown in the nuclear-organellar “cross-talk”) often results in severe developmental defects.
Plants possess some of the most complex organelle compositions of all known eukaryotic cells. As sessile organisms, land-plants must cope with multiple environmental stresses. During their evolution, plants have acquired complex regulatory mechanisms to coordinate cellular functions with environmental stresses. The participation of nuclear-encoded factors in organelle RNA metabolism may therefore provide means to control the biogenesis of the respiratory (and photosynthetic) machineries, and thus to link cellular metabolism and environmental and developmental signals. Following this idea, the splicing of both plastidial (Barkan, 1989; Kahlau and Bock, 2008) and mitochondrial introns (Li-Pook-Than et al., 2004; Dalby and Bonen, 2013) is developmentally and environmentally responsive. Likewise, the expression of group II intron splicing factors and other genes implicated in mitochondrial genome expression and RNA metabolism in plants is tightly regulated during the early stages of germination (Narsai et al., 2011).
The importance of these stages is further reflected in plant mutants affected in genes required for the splicing of mitochondrial introns. Such mutants exhibit reduced germination and seedling establishment, and are often affected in growth and development (see Keren et al., 2012). As many of the introns in the mtDNAs in angiosperms are inserted in complex I subunit genes, but some also reside in ccmFc, cox2 and the ribosomal rpl2 and rps3 genes, the splicing mutants are strongly affected in respiratory associated functions and cellular metabolism (Keren et al., 2012). These mutants are viable in plants, plausibly due to the presence of non-energy conserving respiratory pathways which allow electron transport from NAD(P)H to oxygen (O2) (reviewed in Millar et al., 2011). These pathways also allow plant mitochondria to respire in the presence of rotenone and cyanide, inhibitors of complex I and complex IV, respectively. Thus, the analysis of nuclear-encoded factors required in pre-mRNA processing is expected to give new insights into these processes in plant organellar biology and to contribute to our overall understanding of complex regulatory pathways controlling the biogenesis of respiratory apparatus in plants and other eukaryotic systems (Meyer et al., 2011; Colas des Francs-Small and Small, 2013).
Perspectives
Mitochondrial Group II Introns—Progenitors of the Nuclear Spliceosome Machinery?
Based on the structural features, the similarity of exon-intron boundaries and a common splicing-mechanism, group II introns are proposed to be ancestors of the eukaryotic spliceosomal introns (Sharp, 1985; Cech, 1986; Lynch and Kewalramani, 2003; Martin and Koonin, 2006). While bacterial group II introns are generally thought to be self-sufficient with respect to splicing, numerous different nuclear-encoded factors are required to support the splicing of organellar group II introns in angiosperms (de Longevialle et al., 2010; Barkan, 2011). While only a single intron maturase has been retained in the two organelle genomes of angiosperms, several other maturase genes have been transferred into the nucleus during the evolution of plants. These are all postulated to function in the splicing of organellar introns. Similarly, genetic screens in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii demonstrated that the trans-splicing of the two group II introns in its chloroplast genome, is also facilitated by a large set of nuclear-encoded RNA binding cofactors (Goldschmidt-Clermont et al., 1990; Perron et al., 2004). Recently, a group II intron in Clostridium tetani, was shown to undergo alternative splicing reactions resulting with five alternative mRNAs products, each encoding a distinct protein isoform (McNeil et al., in press). Together, these observations further suggested that a group II intron invader of the eukaryotic cell nucleus, possibly derived from the mitochondrial symbiont, served as the evolutionary precursor to the nuclear splicesomal introns. According to this view, the RNA structures required for group II catalysis began to function in “trans” in a primitive spliceosome, and the group II structural features of the target primordial introns degenerated. Interestingly, features of some plant mitochondrial introns reflect possible stages that may have occurred in such a process. Several undergo trans-splicing: different portions of the intron are assembled from two and in one case, three different transcripts. At least one trans-splicing intron undergoes a significant degree of mis-splicing, and this is lost in plants in which the intron is further fragmented, a process that may have played a role in the formation of the primordial spliceosome. Also, several introns lack key structural features, such as the bulged adenosine in the DVI stem, which serves as the nucleophile in the first splicing step (Figure 2) and may be reflective of an early stage in the structural degeneracy that took place in target introns of the evolving spliceosome.
Maturases and their accessory splicing factors in plant mitochondria, thus represent a highly versatile set of proteins which differ from their presumptive monospecific ancestors. These features may correspond to a further evolutionary link between mitochondrial group II introns and the spliceosomal machinery in nuclear genomes of most eukaryotic cells. Likewise, the recruitment of different protein cofactors to assist with the splicing of mitochondrial introns in plants (see Figure 6) may reflect processes analogous to those that took place during the evolution of the nuclear spliceosome. In particular, the transition of maturases from specific to versatile splicing factors, may have allowed them to serve as principal component in the evolution of the nuclear spliceosome with its ability to act on a distinct subset of introns in “trans.” The homology of group II maturases to the core spliceosomal splicing factor (Dlakic and Mushegian, 2011) further supports this view. Future research will be aimed at determining whether plant maturases have gained the ability to act on multiple intron targets by acquiring versatility in intron recognition and intron structure modification.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants to Oren Ostersetzer-Biran from the Israeli Science Foundation (ISF grant no. 980/11) and from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, Canada, to Gregory G. Brown.
References
Adams, K. L., Qiu, Y.-L., Stoutemyer, M., and Palmer, J. D. (2002). Punctuated evolution of mitochondrial gene content: high and variable rates of mitochondrial gene loss and transfer to the nucleus during angiosperm evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 9905–9912. doi: 10.1073/pnas.042694899
Barkan, A. (1989). Tissue-dependent plastid RNA splicing in maize: transcripts from four plastid genes are predominantly unspliced in leaf meristems and roots. Plant Cell 1, 437–445. doi: 10.1105/tpc.1.4.437
Barkan, A. (2004). “Intron splicing in plant organelles,” in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology of Plant Organelles, Intron Splicing in Plant Organelles, eds H. Daniell and C. Chase (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic), 281–308. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-3166-3_11
Barkan, A. (2011). Expression of plastid genes: organelle-specific elaborations on a prokaryotic scaffold. Plant Physiol. 155, 1520–1532. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.171231
Barkan, A., Klipcan, L., Ostersetzer, O., Kawamura, T., Asakura, Y., and Watkins, K. P. (2007). The CRM domain: an RNA binding module derived from an ancient ribosome-associated protein. RNA 13, 55–64. doi: 10.1261/rna.139607
Barkan, A., Rojas, M., Fujii, S., Yap, A., Chong, Y., Bond, C., et al. (2012). A combinatorial amino acid code for RNA recognition by pentatricopeptide repeat proteins. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002910
Belfort, M., Derbyshire, V., Parker, M. M., Cousineau, B., and Lambowitz, A. M. (2002). “Mobile introns: pathways and proteins,” in Mobile DNA II, eds N. L. Craig, R. Craigie, M. Gellert, and A. M. Lambowitz (Washington, DC: ASM Press), 761–783.
Binder, S., and Brennicke, A. (2003). Gene expression in plant mitochondria: transcriptional and post-transcriptional control. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 358, 181–188. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1179
Bonen, L. (2008). Cis- and trans-splicing of group II introns in plant mitochondria. Mitochondrion 8, 26–34. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2007.09.005
Bonen, L., and Vogel, J. (2001). The ins and outs of group II introns. Trends Genet. 17, 322–331. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525(01)02324-1
Brangeon, J., Sabar, M., Gutierres, S., Combettes, B., Bove, J., Gendy, C., et al. (2000). Defective splicing of the first nad4 intron is associated with lack of several complex I subunits in the Nicotiana sylvestris NMS1 nuclear mutant. Plant J. 21, 269–280. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00679.x
Cech, T. R. (1986). The generality of self-splicing RNA: relationship to nuclear messenger-RNA splicing. Cell 44, 207–210. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90751-8
Chapdelaine, Y., and Bonen, L. (1991). The wheat mitochondrial gene for subunit I of the NADH dehydrogenase complex: a trans-splicing model for this gene-in-pieces. Cell 65, 465–472. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90464-A
Chateigner-Boutin, A.-L., des Francs-Small, C. C., Delannoy, E., Kahlau, S., Tanz, S. K., de Longevialle, A. F., et al. (2011). OTP70 is a pentatricopeptide repeat protein of the E subgroup involved in splicing of the plastid transcript rpoC1. Plant J. 65, 532–542. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04441.x
Clifton, S. W., Minx, P., Fauron, C. M.-R., Gibson, M., Allen, J. O., Sun, H., et al. (2004). Sequence and comparative analysis of the maize NB mitochondrial genome. Plant Physiol. 136, 3486–3503. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.044602
Colas des Francs-Small, C., Kroeger, T., Zmudjak, M., Ostersetzer-Biran, O., Rahimi, N., Small, I., et al. (2012). A PORR domain protein required for rpl2 and ccmFc intron splicing and for the biogenesis of c-type cytochromes in Arabidopsis mitochondria. Plant J. 69, 996–1005. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04849.x
Colas des Francs-Small, C., and Small, I. (2013). Surrogate mutants for studying mitochondrially encoded functions. Biochimie. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2013.08.019. [Epub ahead of print].
Cousineau, B., Smith, D., Lawrence-Cavanagh, S., Mueller, J. E., Yang, J., Mills, D., et al. (1998). Retrohoming of a bacterial group II intron: mobility via complete reverse splicing, independent of homologous DNA recombination. Cell 94, 451–462. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81586-X
Dai, L. X., Toor, N., Olson, R., Keeping, A., and Zimmerly, S. (2003). Database for mobile group II introns. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 424–426. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg049
Dalby, S. J., and Bonen, L. (2013). Impact of low temperature on splicing of atypical group II introns in wheat mitochondria. Mitochondrion 13, 647–655. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2013.09.001
Daniels, D. L., Michels, W. J. Jr., and Pyle, A. M. (1996). Two competing pathways for self-splicing by group II introns: a quantitative analysis of in vitro reaction rates and products. J. Mol. Biol. 256, 31–49. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0066
Dasso, M. (1993). RCC1 in the cell cycle: the regulator of chromosome condensation takes on new roles. Trends Biochem. Sci. 18, 96–101. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(93)90161-F
de Longevialle, A. F., Small, I. D., and Lurin, C. (2010). Nuclearly encoded splicing factors implicated in RNA splicing in higher plant organelles. Mol. Plant 3, 691–705. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssq025
Dlakic, M., and Mushegian, A. (2011). Prp8, the pivotal protein of the spliceosomal catalytic center, evolved from a retroelement-encoded reverse transcriptase. RNA 17, 799–808. doi: 10.1261/rna.2396011
Elina, H., and Brown, G. G. (2010). Extensive mis-splicing of a bi-partite plant mitochondrial group II intron. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 996–1008. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp994
Falcon de Longevialle, A., Meyer, E. H., Andres, C., Taylor, N. L., Lurin, C., Millar, A. H., et al. (2007). The pentatricopeptide repeat gene OTP43 is required for trans-splicing of the mitochondrial nad1 intron 1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 19, 3256–3265. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.054841
Fedorova, O., Solem, A., and Pyle, A. M. (2010). Protein-facilitated folding of group II intron ribozymes. J. Mol. Biol. 397, 799–813. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.02.001
Finnegan, P. M., and Brown, G. G. (1990). Transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of RNA levels in maize mitochondria. Plant Cell 2, 71–83. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.1.71
Gagliardi, D., and Binder, S. (2007). “Expression of the plant mitochondrial genome,” in Plant Mitochondria, ed D. Logan (Ames, IA: Blackwell Publishing), 50–95. doi: 10.1002/9780470986592.ch3
Goldschmidt-Clermont, M., Girard-Bascou, J., Choquet, Y., and Rochaix, J. D. (1990). Trans-splicing mutants of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Mol. Gen. Genet. 223, 417–425. doi: 10.1007/BF00264448
Guo, W., and Mower, J. (2013). Evolution of plant mitochondrial intron-encoded maturases: frequent lineage-specific loss and recurrent intracellular transfer to the nucleus. J. Mol. Evol. 77, 43–54. doi: 10.1007/s00239-013-9579-7
Haïli, N., Arnal, N., Quadrado, M., Amiar, S., Tcherkez, G., Dahan, J., et al. (2013). The pentatricopeptide repeat MTSF1 protein stabilizes the nad4 mRNA in Arabidopsis mitochondria. Nucl. Acids Res. 41, 6650–6663. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt337
Handa, H. (2003). The complete nucleotide sequence and RNA editing content of the mitochondrial genome of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): comparative analysis of the mitochondrial genomes of rapeseed and Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 5907–5916. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg795
Hausner, G., Olson, R., Simon, D., Johnson, I., Sanders, E. R., Karol, K. G., et al. (2006). Origin and evolution of the chloroplast trnK (matK) intron: a model for evolution of group II intron RNA structures. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 380–391. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msj047
Ichinose, M., Tasaki, E., Sugita, C., and Sugita, M. (2012). A PPR-DYW protein is required for splicing of a group II intron of cox1 pre-mRNA in Physcomitrella patens. Plant J. 70, 271–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04869.x
Kahlau, S., and Bock, R. (2008). Plastid transcriptomics and translatomics of tomato fruit development and chloroplast-to-chromoplast differentiation: chromoplast gene expression largely serves the production of a single protein. Plant Cell 20, 856–874. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.055202
Keren, I., Bezawork-Geleta, A., Kolton, M., Maayan, I., Belausov, E., Levy, M., et al. (2009). AtnMat2, a nuclear-encoded maturase required for splicing of group-II introns in Arabidopsis mitochondria. RNA 15, 2299–2311. doi: 10.1261/rna.1776409
Keren, I., Klipcan, L., Bezawork-Geleta, A., Kolton, M., Shaya, F., and Ostersetzer-Biran, O. (2008). Characterization of the molecular basis of group II intron RNA recognition by CRS1-CRM domains. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 23333–23342. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M710488200
Keren, I., Tal, L., des Francs-Small, C. C., Araújo, W. L., Shevtsov, S., Shaya, F., et al. (2012). nMAT1, a nuclear-encoded maturase involved in the trans-splicing of nad1 intron 1, is essential for mitochondrial complex I assembly and function. Plant J. 71, 413–426. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.04998.x
Kim, S., and Yoon, M.-K. (2010). Comparison of mitochondrial and chloroplast genome segments from three onion (Allium cepa L.) cytoplasm types and identification of a trans-splicing intron of cox2. Curr. Genet. 56, 177–188. doi: 10.1007/s00294-010-0290-6
Knoop, V. (2012). “Seed plant mitochondrial genomes: complexity evolving,” in Genomics of Chloroplasts and Mitochondria, eds Bock and Knoop (East Lansing, MI: Springer), 175–195. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-2920-9_8
Knoop, V., Altwasser, M., and Brennicke, A. (1997). A tripartite group II intron in mitochondria of an angiosperm plant. Mol. Gen. Genet. 255, 269–276. doi: 10.1007/s004380050497
Knoop, V., Schuster, W., Wissinger, B., and Brennicke, A. (1991). Trans splicing integrates an exon of 22 nucleotides into the nad5 mRNA in higher plant mitochondria. EMBO J. 10, 3483–3493.
Köhler, D., Schmidt-Gattung, S., and Binder, S. (2010). The DEAD-box protein PMH2 is required for efficient group II intron splicing in mitochondria of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol. 72, 459–467. doi: 10.1007/s11103-009-9584-9
Koprivova, A., Colas des Francs-Small, C., Calder, G., Mugford, S. T., Tanz, S., Lee, B.-R., et al. (2010). Identification of a pentatricopeptide repeat protein implicated in splicing of intron 1 of mitochondrial nad7 transcripts. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 32192–32199. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.147603
Kroeger, T. S., Watkins, K. P., Friso, G., van Wijk, K. J., and Barkan, A. (2009). A plant-specific RNA-binding domain revealed through analysis of chloroplast group II intron splicing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 4537–4542. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812503106
Kubo, T., Nishizawa, S., Sugawara, A., Itchoda, N., Estiati, A., and Mikami, T. (2000). The complete nucleotide sequence of the mitochondrial genome of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) reveals a novel gene for tRNA(Cys)(GCA). Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 2571–2576. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.13.2571
Kühn, K., Carrie, C., Giraud, E., Wang, Y., Meyer, E. H., Narsai, R., et al. (2011). The RCC1 family protein RUG3 is required for splicing of nad2 and complex I biogenesis in mitochondria of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 67, 1067–1080. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04658.x
Lambowitz, A. M., Caprara, M. G., Zimmerly, S., and Perlman, P. (1999). “Group I and Group II Ribozymes as RNPs: clues to the past and guides to the future,” in The RNA World, eds R. Gesteland, T. Cech, and J. Atkins, (Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press), 451–485.
Lambowitz, A. M., and Zimmerly, S. (2004). Mobile group II introns. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38, 1–35. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.091600
Lambowitz, A. M., and Zimmerly, S. (2011). Group II introns: mobile ribozymes that invade DNA. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3, 1–19. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a003616.
Li-Pook-Than, J., and Bonen, L. (2006). Multiple physical forms of excised group II intron RNAs in wheat mitochondria. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 2782–2790. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl328
Li-Pook-Than, J., Carrillo, C., and Bonen, L. (2004). Variation in mitochondrial transcript profiles of protein-coding genes during early germination and seedling development in wheat. Curr. Genet. 46, 374. doi: 10.1007/s00294-004-0544-2
Liu, Y., He, J., Chen, Z., Ren, X., Hong, X., and Gong, Z. (2010). ABA overly-sensitive 5 (ABO5), encoding a pentatricopeptide repeat protein required for cis-splicing of mitochondrial nad2 intron 3, is involved in the abscisic acid response in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 63, 749–765. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04280.x
Lurin, C., Andres, C., Aubourg, S., Bellaoui, M., Bitton, F., Bruyere, C., et al. (2004). Genome-wide analysis of arabidopsis pentatricopeptide repeat proteins reveals their essential role in organelle biogenesis. Plant Cell 16, 2089–2103. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.022236
Lynch, M., and Kewalramani, A. (2003). Messenger RNA surveillance and the evolutionary proliferation of introns. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 563–571. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msg068
Malek, O., and Knoop, V. (1998). Trans-splicing group II introns in plant mitochondria: the complete set of cis-arranged homologs in ferns, fern allies, and a hornwort. RNA 4, 1599–1609. doi: 10.1017/S1355838298981262
Martin, W., and Koonin, E. V. (2006). Introns and the origin of nucleus-cytosol compartmentalization. Nature 440, 41–45. doi: 10.1038/nature04531
Matsuura, M., Noah, J. W., and Lambowitz, A. M. (2001). Mechanism of maturase-promoted group II intron splicing. EMBO J. 20, 7259–7270. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.24.7259
Matthes, A., Schmidt-Gattung, S., Köhler, D., Forner, J., Wildum, S., Raabe, M., et al. (2007). Two DEAD-box proteins may be part of RNA-Dependent High-Molecular-Mass protein complexes in Arabidopsis Mitochondria. Plant Physiol. 145, 1637–1646. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.108076
McNeil, B. A., Simon, D. M., and Zimmerly, S. (in press). Alternative splicing of a group II intron in a surface layer protein gene in Clostridium tetani. Nucleic Acids Res. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1053
Meyer, E. H., Solheim, C., Tanz, S. K., Bonnard, G., and Millar, A. H. (2011). Insights into the composition and assembly of the membrane arm of plant complex I through analysis of subcomplexes in Arabidopsis mutant lines. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 26081–26092. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.209601
Michel, F., and Ferat, J. L. (1995). Structure and activities of group-II introns. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 64, 435–461. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.64.070195.002251
Michel, F., Umesono, K., and Ozeki, H. (1989). Comparative and functional anatomy of group II catalytic introns—a review. Gene 82, 5–30. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90026-7
Millar, A. H., Whelan, J., Soole, K. L., and Day, D. A. (2011). Organization and regulation of mitochondrial respiration in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 62, 79–104. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103857
Mohr, G., and Lambowitz, A. M. (2003). Putative proteins related to group II intron reverse transcriptase/maturases are encoded by nuclear genes in higher plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 647–652. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg153
Nakagawa, N., and Sakurai, N. (2006). A mutation in At-nMat1a, which encodes a nuclear gene having high similarity to group II Intron maturase, causes impaired splicing of mitochondrial nad4 transcript and altered carbon metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 47, 772–783. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcj051
Narsai, R., Law, S. R., Carrie, C., Xu, L., and Whelan, J. (2011). In depth temporal transcriptome profiling reveals a crucial developmental switch with roles for RNA processing and organelle metabolism that are essential for germination in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 157, 1342–1362. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.183129
Noah, J. W., and Lambowitz, A. M. (2003). Effects of maturase binding and Mg2+ concentration on group II intron RNA folding investigated by UV cross-linking. Biochemistry 42, 12466–12480. doi: 10.1021/bi035339n
Notsu, Y., Masood, S., Nishikawa, T., Kubo, N., Akiduki, G., Nakazono, M., et al. (2002). The complete sequence of the rice (Oryza sativa L.) mitochondrial genome: frequent DNA sequence acquisition and loss during the evolution of flowering plants. Mol. Genet. Genomics 268, 434–445. doi: 10.1007/s00438-002-0767-1
Ogihara, Y., Yamazaki, Y., Murai, K., Kanno, A., Terachi, T., Shiina, T., et al. (2005). Structural dynamics of cereal mitochondrial genomes as revealed by complete nucleotide sequencing of the wheat mitochondrial genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 6235–6250. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki925
Pereira de Souza, A., Jubier, M. F., Delcher, E., Lancelin, D., and Lejeune, B. (1991). A trans-splicing model for the expression of the tripartite nad5 gene in wheat and maize mitochondria. Plant Cell 3, 1363–1378. doi: 10.1105/tpc.3.12.1363
Perron, K., Goldschmidt-Clermont, M., and Rochaix, J.-D. (2004). A multiprotein complex involved in chloroplast group II intron splicing. RNA 10, 704–711. doi: 10.1261/rna.5237804
Putnam, A. A., and Jankowsky, E. (2013). DEAD-box helicases as integrators of RNA, nucleotide and protein binding. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1829, 884–893. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2013.02.002
Pyle, A. M., and Lambowitz, A. M. (1999). “Group II Introns: ribozymes that splice RNA and invade DNA,” in The RNA World, 3rd Edn., eds R. Gesteland, T. R. Cech, and J. Atkins (Cold Spring Harbor, NY: John Inglis), 469–505.
Qin, P. Z., and Pyle, A. M. (1998). The architectural organization and mechanistic function of group II intron structural elements. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 8, 301–308. doi: 10.1016/S0959-440X(98)80062-6
Schmitz-Linneweber, C., and Small, I. (2008). Pentatricopeptide repeat proteins: a socket set for organelle gene expression. Trends Plant Sci. 13, 663–670. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.10.001
Sharp, P. A. (1985). On the origin of RNA splicing and introns. Cell 42, 397–400. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90092-3
Small, I. D., and Peeters, N. (2000). The PPR motif - a TPR-related motif prevalent in plant organellar proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 45. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0004(99)01520-0
Sugiyama, Y., Watase, Y., Nagase, M., Makita, N., Yagura, S., Hirai, A., et al. (2005). The complete nucleotide sequence and multipartite organization of the tobacco mitochondrial genome: comparative analysis of mitochondrial genomes in higher plants. Mol. Genet. Genomics 272, 603–615. doi: 10.1007/s00438-004-1075-8
Takenaka, M., Verbitskiy, D., van der Merwe, J. A., Zehrmann, A., and Brennicke, A. (2008). The process of RNA editing in plant mitochondria. Mitochondrion 8, 35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2007.09.004
Thomson, M. C., Macfarlane, J. L., Beagley, C. T., and Wolstenholme, D. R. (1994). RNA editing of mat-r transcripts in maize and soybean increases similarity of the encoded protein to fungal and bryophyte group-II intron maturases - evidence that mat-r encodes a functional protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 5745–5752. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.25.5745
Toor, N., Keating, K. S., Taylor, S. D., and Pyle, A. M. (2008). Crystal structure of a self-spliced group II intron. Science 320, 77–82. doi: 10.1126/science.1153803
Unseld, M., Marienfeld, J. R., Brandt, P., and Brennicke, A. (1997). The mitochondrial genome of Arabidopsis thaliana contains 57 genes in 366,924 nucleotides. Nat. Genet. 15, 57–61. doi: 10.1038/ng0197-57
Wahleithner, J. A., MacFarlane, J. L., and Wolstenholme, D. R. (1990). A sequence encoding a maturase-related protein in a group II intron of a plant mitochondrial nad1 gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 548–552. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.2.548
Wank, H., SanFilippo, J., Singh, R. N., Matsuura, M., and Lambowitz, A. M. (1999). A reverse transcriptase/maturase promotes splicing by binding at its own coding segment in a group II intron RNA. Mol. Cell 4, 239–250. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80371-8
Yagi, Y., Hayashi, S., Kobayashi, K., Hirayama, T., and Nakamura, T. (2013). Elucidation of the RNA recognition code for pentatricopeptide repeat proteins involved in organelle RNA editing in plants. PLoS ONE 8:e57286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057286
Yin, P., Li, Q., Yan, C., Liu, Y., Liu, J., Yu, F., et al. (2013). Structural basis for the modular recognition of single-stranded RNA by PPR proteins. Nature 504, 168–171. doi: 10.1038/nature12651
Zimmerly, S., Hausner, G., and Wu, X. C. (2001). Phylogenetic relationships among group II intron ORFs. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 1238–1250. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.5.1238
Zmudjak, M., Colas des Francs-Small, C., Keren, I., Shaya, F., Belausov, E., Small, I., et al. (2013). mCSF1, a nucleus-encoded CRM protein required for the processing of many mitochondrial introns, is involved in the biogenesis of respiratory complexes I and IV in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 199, 379–394. doi: 10.1111/nph.12282
Keywords: group II intron, splicing, maturase, splicing factor, respiration, mitochondria, plant
Citation: Brown GG, Colas des Francs-Small C and Ostersetzer-Biran O (2014) Group II intron splicing factors in plant mitochondria. Front. Plant Sci. 5:35. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00035
Received: 01 December 2013; Paper pending published: 07 January 2014;
Accepted: 27 January 2014; Published online: 18 February 2014.
Edited by:
Philippe Giegé, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, FranceReviewed by:
Mamoru Sugita, Nagoya University, JapanBenoît Castandet, Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, USA
Copyright © 2014 Brown, Colas des Francs-Small and Ostersetzer-Biran. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Oren Ostersetzer-Biran, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, The Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Edmond J. Safra Campus, Givat Ram, Jerusalem 91904, Israel e-mail: oren.ostersetzer@mail.huji.ac.il