- 1Functional and Evolutionary Ecology Lab, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Napoli, Italy
- 2Evolutionary Bioinformatics Group, Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
- 3Laboratorio di Proteomica, Dipartimento di Chimica e Tecnologie Chimiche, Università della Calabria, Arcavacata di Rende (CS), Italy
- 4Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari ed Agro-ambientali, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
For seagrasses, seasonal and daily variations in light and temperature represent the mains factors driving their distribution along the bathymetric cline. Changes in these environmental factors, due to climatic and anthropogenic effects, can compromise their survival. In a framework of conservation and restoration, it becomes crucial to improve our knowledge about the physiological plasticity of seagrass species along environmental gradients. Here, we aimed to identify differences in transcriptomic and proteomic profiles, involved in the acclimation along the depth gradient in the seagrass Posidonia oceanica, and to improve the available molecular resources in this species, which is an important requisite for the application of eco-genomic approaches. To do that, from plant growing in shallow (−5 m) and deep (−25 m) portions of a single meadow, (i) we generated two reciprocal Expressed Sequences Tags (EST) libraries using a Suppressive Subtractive Hybridization (SSH) approach, to obtain depth/specific transcriptional profiles, and (ii) we identified proteins differentially expressed, using the highly innovative USIS mass spectrometry methodology, coupled with 1D-SDS electrophoresis and labeling free approach. Mass spectra were searched in the open source Global Proteome Machine (GPM) engine against plant databases and with the X!Tandem algorithm against a local database. Transcriptional analysis showed both quantitative and qualitative differences between depths. EST libraries had only the 3% of transcripts in common. A total of 315 peptides belonging to 64 proteins were identified by mass spectrometry. ATP synthase subunits were among the most abundant proteins in both conditions. Both approaches identified genes and proteins in pathways related to energy metabolism, transport and genetic information processing, that appear to be the most involved in depth acclimation in P. oceanica. Their putative rules in acclimation to depth were discussed.
Introduction
The littoral coastal zone is characterized by severe environmental gradients, which mold distribution of populations and species of marine organisms. In a framework of conservation and restoration of biodiversity and in order to predict responses to environmental changes and to develop ad hoc conservation strategies, it is crucial to improve our knowledge about the limits of physiological acclimation, physiological plasticity, and intraspecific traits variation, of species living along environmental gradient (Thomas et al., 2004; Schmidt et al., 2008; Thomas, 2010; Hill et al., 2010).
Along the coastline all over the world, excluding polar areas (Green and Short, 2003), seagrasses form among the most productive and neglected marine ecosystems, providing an high number of ecosystem's services, also in comparison to terrestrial habitats (Costanza, 1997; McArthur and Boland, 2006).
Seagrass meadows are very sensitive to disturbance and are being lost rapidly in both developed and developing parts of the world (Short and Wyllie-Echeverria, 1996; Waycott et al., 2009), with only occasional efforts for mitigation and restoration. Seagrass loss has been attributed to a broad spectrum of anthropogenic and natural causes that largely diminish their habitat, affecting their distribution and diversity (Orth et al., 2006; Waycott et al., 2009). For marine plants, seasonal and daily variations in light availability and temperature represent the mains factors driving their distributions along the bathymetric cline. Changes in these environmental factors, due to climatic and anthropogenic effects, can compromise the survival of these key ecosystem-engineering species (Doney et al., 2002).
In Mediterranean Sea, the endemic seagrass Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile can grow as deep as 50 m, depending on light penetration and water clarity (Pasqualini et al., 1998), being extremely sensitive to changes in light availability (Lee et al., 2007). The increase of water turbidity, widely observed as result of human activities along the coastline, affects particularly the deep distribution of the meadows (Ardizzone et al., 2006). P. oceanica grows according to a phalanx strategy, with sporadic sexual reproduction and slow-growing clonal lineages, which can persist in situ for hundreds of years (Ruggiero et al., 2002; Migliaccio et al., 2005; Arnaud-Haond et al., 2012). Plasticity of P. oceanica long-living clones must play an important role on the persistence of the species, being able to survive changes of environmental conditions, as the ones experienced by the unstable highly-impacted Mediterranean coastline.
During the last decades, the application of -omics technologies at ecological studies provided powerful tools for following the physiological acclimation in response to environmental variations (Feder and Walser, 2005; Foret et al., 2007; Gracey, 2007; Karr, 2008), and helped researchers to correlate the differences of gene's expression profiles to changes in the main ecological cues in many different organisms (Chevalier et al., 2004; Edge et al., 2008; Kassahn et al., 2009; Larsen et al., 2012; Richards et al., 2012).
Despite their high ecological value, seagrasses are poorly understood for what concerns the genetic basis behind their physiological adaptation and plasticity (Procaccini et al., 2007). It's only recently that transcriptomic approaches were implemented for few species, to correlate seagrasses gene expression with ecological factors. In particular, transcriptomic response to temperature changes and thermal stress was studies in the two congeneric species, Zostera marina and Zostera noltii (Maathuis et al., 2003; Reusch et al., 2008; Massa et al., 2011; Winters et al., 2011), while transcriptional (Bruno et al., 2010; Serra et al., 2012b) and proteomic approaches (Mazzuca et al., 2009) were applied to study light response in natural conditions in Posidonia oceanica. In P. oceanica, studies were hampered by the fact that available genomic and transcriptomic resources only consisted in a single Expressed Sequences Tags (EST) library, obtained from shoots collected along a depth range (from −5 to −30 m) in a single site (Wissler et al., 2009), and available in Dr.Zompo, a specific seagrasses database containing both P. oceanica and Z. marina EST sequences http://drzompo.uni-muenster.de/ (Wissler et al., 2009).
Several approaches can be utilized for genomic studies in species for which the whole genome is not available (e.g., Hofmann et al., 2005; Stapley et al., 2010), most of them requiring high computational power and advanced bioinformatics resources (Morozova and Marra, 2008; Pop and Salzberg, 2008; Metzker, 2010). Among the others, Suppressive Subtractive Hybridization (SSH)–EST library (Diatchenko et al., 1996) approach resulted especially powerful to identify differentially expressed genes in the presence of clear differences in physiological status (Jones et al., 2006; Puthoff and Smigocki, 2007) and it was applied to study flowering (Matsumoto, 2006), senescence (Liu et al., 2008a,b), or salt-stress (Zouari et al., 2007) in terrestrial plants.
The aim of this work was to identify differences in transcriptional and proteomic profiles in P. oceanica, correlated with its bathymetric distribution, with the ultimate goal to identify the metabolic pathways involved in acclimation. We also aimed to increase genomic resources in P. oceanica and to present a powerful approach for studying physiological response at a molecular level in organisms for which genomic resources are limited.
In order to do that, we built a SSH-library between plants growing at two different depths in the same meadow, and we obtained their protein content using the innovative USIS mass spectrometry methodology coupled with 1D-SDS electrophoresis. Proteins identifications were performed using the Global Proteome Machine (GPM) open-source system for analyzing, storing, and validating proteomics information derived from tandem mass spectrometry (Craig et al., 2004; Fenyö et al., 2010) and X!Tandem software (Craig and Beavis, 2003; Craig et al., 2005) against a local database derived by Dr.Zompo and UniProtKB databases.
Materials and Methods
Shoots Sampling
Posidonia oceanica shoots were collected by SCUBA diving in the Lacco Ameno meadow, Island of Ischia (Gulf of Naples, 40°45′52′′ N; 13°53′29′′ E) at two sampling stations located above and below the summer thermocline (−5 and −25 m depths).
Leaf tissue from 20 shoots for each stand was cleaned from epiphytes and shock frozen in dry ice on the research vessel soon after collection. Tissue was stored at −80°C before RNA and proteins extraction.
Temperature, salinity and Photosynthetic Active Radiation (PAR) were measured at the surface and at six different depths along the bathymetric distribution of the meadow (Table 1). Values were obtained right before shoot sampling, using a Seabird Seacat Probe operated from the boat and connected to a wired computer onboard.
RNA Extraction
Total RNA was isolated from leaf tissue of ten shoots for each condition, using hexadecyltrimertihyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) method (Chang et al., 1993) with some modifications. About 4 g of each shoot were weighted and grind to a fine powder in liquid nitrogen in a pre-cooled mortal. The powder was transferred to an Eppendorf tube and 1 ml of pre-warmed extraction buffer was added to the samples (2% CTAB, 0.2% β-mercaptoethanol, 1.4 M NaCl, 20 mM EDTA, 200 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5). After incubation at 65°C for 10 min, 800 μl chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (49:1 v/v) were added. After centrifugation, at 6500 rpm for 10 min, the RNA was selectively precipitated from the upper phase through the addition of 1/4 volume 10 M LiCl and precipitated for 2–4 h at −20°C. RNA was recovered by centrifugation (Beckman JA-20 rotor) at 11,000 rpm at 4°C for 30 min. Supernatant containing genomic DNA was removed and pellets were washed once with 1 ml 100% EtOH and two times with 1 ml 75% EtOH. Precipitations were followed by centrifuging at 10,000 rpm for 5 min to remove the EtOH and pellets were dried at room temperature for few minutes. RNA was suspended in 50 μ l H2O RNase free. RNA quality and quantity was evaluated by gel electrophoresis and by Nano-Drop (ND-1000 UV-Vis spectrophotometer; NanoDrop Technologies) monitoring the absorbance at 260 nm. Purity was determined by 260/280 nm and 260/230 nm ratios using the same instrument. All samples resulted free from protein and organic solvents used during RNA extraction. RNA was stored at −80°C.
Construction of Suppressive Subtractive Hybridization (SSH)-Libraries
For each depths considered in the experiment, the same quantity of total RNA extracted from individual shoot was pooled. About 280 μg of each RNA pools were purified using Dynabeads mRNA Purification kit (DYNAL BIOTECH), following the manufactures instructions, in order to select polyA+ mRNA.
The construction of the forward and reverse SSH libraries was performed using the PCR-select cDNA subtraction kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA), following the manufacturers instruction. Shallow library (FORWARD subtraction, S) was carried out with shallow mRNA as tester pool and deep mRNA as driver pool. Reversely, in the deep library (REVERSE subtraction, D), deep mRNA was used as tester pool and shallow mRNA as driver pool.
The two resulting subtractive libraries were cloned individually in pCR2.1-TOPO vector (Invitrogen), and transferred into TOP F' cells (Invitrogen) with vector: insert ratio 1:10, following manufacturer's instructions. Colonies were grown overnight in Petri dishes with LB medium and Ampicillin (μg/ml). Afterwards, single colonies were picked and transferred into 96-well plates containing LB and Ampicillin (LB/Amp) to grow overnight. About twenty 96-well plates for each library (S and D) were screened in PCR to identified positive recombinant colonies. Every single colony has been amplified using specific primers of the TOPO vector: T7 forward and M13 reverse. PCR products have been analyzed on 1.5% Agarose gel stained with Ethidium Bromide in 1× TAE buffer. For each library, about 1000 colonies having an insert longer than 500 bp were selected for sequencing (data not shown).
Finally, replicates of selected colonies were stored in LB/Amp-15% glycerol (at −80°C) and shipped to the Biologisch-Technische Produkte Service of the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics (Molgen, Berlin, DE) for ESTs sequencing using ABI 3730xl automated DNA sequencers (Applied Biosystems, USA).
Data Analyses and Bioinformatics
Bioinformatics analysis of EST data sequences was carried out by the Evolutionary Bioinformatics Group at the Westfälische Wilhelms University Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity (Münster, DE).
Raw sequences of each library were trimmed removing the low quality regions, the vector, the adapter and the poly-A/T regions, using PREGAP4 (Staden, 1996). Only the EST raw sequences longer than 100 nucleotides entered the assembly step. Successfully trimmed EST reads were assembled into tentative unigenes (TUGs) using CAP3 (Huang, 1999). After trimming and deletion of short sequences (94 in total), only sequences of good quality were finally assembled into 486 TUG, which include 2290 ESTs. Considering other 286 single reads (Singletons), a total of 772 SSH-Unigenes were identified. To infer functions of SSH-Unigenes, an homology search, using BLASTN algorithm, was made against public multiple databases: non-redundant NCBI Gene Ontology (GO), KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes), SWISSPROT, and NR-NCBI (using BLASTX algorithm with an Expect-value threshold of = 0.001) and Dr.Zompo. Identified Unigenes were stored in the database Dr.Zompo as “Pooc_B” library. Divergence in gene expression patterns at the two different depths, was assessed mapping Unigenes into functional categories using Mapman (Thimm et al., 2004).
Protein Extraction and Electrophoresis
Only adult leaves were used for this purpose according to Spadafora et al. (2008). Plant material was grounded to a fine powder in liquid N2 using mortar and pestle and transferred to a centrifuge tube, where cold 10% trichloroacetic acid in acetone with 0.1 M β-mercaptoethanol, was added. Samples were kept at −20°C for at least 2 h, and then centrifuged at 12,000 g for 15 min at 4°C. The resulting pellet was washed 3 times by suspending in acetone containing 0.1 M DTT and centrifuged as above between each wash. The pellet was air-dried and used for protein extraction. Tissue powder from ten different plants from shallow (A) and deep (B) conditions, respectively, was pooled and used for phenol-based protein extraction (Spadafora et al., 2008). Tissue powder was re-suspended in extraction buffer containing 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.8, 2% SDS and 0.1 M β-mercaptoethanol. Supernatant was mixed with equal volume of buffered phenol (pH 8.0, Sigma). Phases were separated by centrifugation at 15,000 g for 5 min. The phenol phase was precipitated with 5 volumes of cold methanol containing 0.1 M ammonium acetate overnight (−20°C). Protein phase was recovered by centrifugation and washed twice with cold acetone. The phenol extraction step has been repeated twice for each set of samples and thereafter processed for mass spectrometry analyses.
Protein samples from Sets A and B were processed on 1D SDS-PAGE; the Laemmli buffer system was used to cast a 6% stacking gel and 12.5% resolving gel. After denaturation at 100°C for 3 min, proteins were resolved at constant voltage (200 V) in a Bio-Rad mini Protean II apparatus. CBB stained gels were scanned on a densitometer (GS800, Biorad) and peptide bands were quantified using QuantityOne software (Bio-Rad). 1D gel lines from Sets A and B samples were cut in 24 slices each (Figure 1) and digested enzymatically with trypsin. The tryptic fragments were analyzed by LC-ESI MS/MS coupled with the ionization source for mass spectrometers named Universal Soft Ionization Source (USIS) (Cristoni S, patent no. PCT/EP2007/004094). For the experiments, a Bruker HTC Ultra spectrometer, equipped with a Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC system, was used. Chromatography separations were conducted on a Thermo Biobasic C18 column (1 mm i.d. _ 100 mm length and 5 μm particle size), using a linear gradient from 5 to 90% acetonitrile (ACN), containing 0.1% formic acid with a flow of 100 μ L/min, including the regeneration step; one run lasted 70 min. Acquisitions were performed in the data-dependent MS/MS scanning mode (full MS scan range of m/z 250–2000 followed by full MS/MS scan for the most intense ion from the MS scan).
Figure 1. One-dimensional-SDS-PAGE. One-dimensional-SDS-PAGE of two independent biological replicates of leaf proteins purified from shallow (lanes 1 and 2) and deep (lanes 4 and 5) P. oceanica plants. Each gel lane was cut in 24 slices, then each couple (1S;1D…24S;24D) from swallow and deep lanes was comparatively analyzed by mass spectrometry as Sets A and B datasets.
Protein Identification
Spectra acquired by LC-MS/MS were used to identify peptide sequences using the open-source system GPM software against the GPM plant database (http://plant.thegpm.org/tandem/thegpm_tandem.html). Since the GPM plant database considers only a few species belonging to Liliopsida, excluding seagrasses, this procedure can lead to a loss of peptide identification by mass spectrometry. Thus, spectra acquired by LC-MS/MS were also used to identify peptide sequences using X!Tandem software (http://www.thegpm.org/tandem/index.html) against a local database. X!Tandem is a search engine for identifying proteins by searching sequence collections, reducing the time required to match protein sequences with tandem mass spectra (Craig and Beavis, 2003). It scores the match between an observed tandem mass spectrum and a peptide sequence, by calculating a score that is based on the intensities of the fragment ions and the number of matching b- and y-ions. This score is converted to an expectation value using the distribution of scores of randomly matching peptides (Fenyö et al., 2010).
In the local database, sequences from seagrasses and other species belonging to Liliopsida available in the UniprotKB database and the amino acid sequences of P. oceanica and Z. marina deduced from five ESTs libraries (Pooc_A, Pooc_B, Zoma_A, Zoma_B and Zoma_C) collected in the Dr.Zompo database (Wissler et al., 2009, http://drzompo.uni-muenster.de/) were included. In the last case, it has been necessary first to create a protein database from the nucleotide sequences. For this, the most straightforward procedure is listing all possible ORFs from the six reading frames; the resulting list contains a large majority of protein sequences that are unlikely to be real, but MS/MS data allow to discriminate between real and false polypeptide sequences (Armengaud, 2009). The use of all possible reading frames has allowed to optimize the peptide identifications. ESTs are relatively error prone (Alba et al., 2004) and an ORF can be split and displayed over 2 or 3 frames when a frame-shift error exists on the cDNA sequence. Consequently, the deduced protein sequence can be incorrect (Serra et al., 2012a). The translation of each nucleotide sequence was performed using a translation tool available at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/st/emboss_transeq/5.
Results
SSH-Library
After assembly process and trimming, ESTs sequences clustered to 772 TUGs, 286 of which were Singletons and 486 were Contigs, consisting of two or more reads. Among the TUGs identified, the 45% (349/772) had a GO annotation, while the 55% (423/772) were not classified in GO. Protein annotation against SwissProt database, gave in total 278 Unigenes classified into putative known functions or unclassified proteins. Based on Dr.Zompo database, only the 39% of the total number of SSH-Contigs (189/486) had homologies with known P. oceanica ESTs sequences, while 61% (297/486) were new. The main statistic features of the SSH–EST library are reported in Table 2, other data are reported in Table S1.
Annotation and other features of SSH-TUGs are listed in Tables S2a,b. TUGs were included in the database Dr.Zompo (http://drzompo.uni-muenster.de/) in the P. oceanica “Pooc_B” library. The 2576 single ESTs obtained were submitted to the dbEST within GeneBank (LIB EST_Pooc SSH, Genbank Accession Numbers: JZ354020–JZ356595).
Comparison of Tentative Unigenes Frequencies Between Shallow and Deep Conditions
Among the 486 Contigs identified, only 28 (3% of the total) were present in both libraries, while 314 Contigs have been found only in the deep-library (D-library) and 200 Contigs only in the shallow-library (S-library). For Singletons, 147 and 139 were present only in the D-library and in the S-library, respectively (Table 2).
TUGs more abundant in the S-library include (i) proteins involved in protein turnover, as Proteasome subunit alpha, E3 ubiquitin (F-box protein) and ATP-dependent Clp protease proteolytic subunit and (ii) proteins involved in stress defense, as Heat shock cognate 70 kDa protein, Ketol-acid reductoisomerase, Acyl-CoA-binding protein and Cytochromes c/b subunits (Table S2a). TUGs more abundant in the D-library include (i) proteins involved in the photosynthetic pathways as Chlorophyll a-b-binding proteins, Photosystem I/II, Oxygen-evolving enhancer protein and (ii) proteins involved in basal metabolism and in stress response, as Universal stress protein, Zinc-finger protein, Metallothionein-like protein, Cytochrome P450, Caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase, Aquaporin PIP2 and S-norcoclaurine synthase (Table S2b).
Among Contigs, only six showed significant differences in frequency (p ≤ 0.05) between libraries. Five Contigs were up-regulated in S-library and only one was up-regulated in D-library (Table 3). The differential expression of two of these Contigs, Pooc_B_c42, encoding for a N(2),N(2)-dimethylguanosine tRNA methyltransferase, and Pooc_B_c217, whose function is unknown, has been tested in RT-qPCR and showed the expected expression profiles (Figure S1, also see Serra et al., 2012b).
Since SSH technique can also generate background clones which are not representing differentially expressed sequences but can be false positives, we will consider the remaining transcripts identified here as “putative differentially expressed” until each one will be experimentally validated in future studies.
Differences between libraries were both quantitative, i.e., relative expression of particular Unigenes, assessed as number of reads, and qualitative, i.e., comparing proteins for the same functional categories or the same metabolic pathways. The comparative abundance of each functional category is shown in Figure 2. Genes belonging to light related processes (e.g., photosynthesis and energetic metabolism), genetic information processing (e.g., transcription and translation), transport, folding, sorting, and degradation of proteins were abundant in both conditions. Nevertheless, looking at different pathways, differences were observed in their protein composition. For the photosynthetic pathway, in the D-library there are 26 different TUGs encoding for Chlorophyll a-b-binding proteins, whereas only 15 different TUGs were present in the shallow one (Tables S2a,b). The opposite trend was observed for proteins related to electrons carrier transport (Tables S2a,b). TUGs assigned to PSI and PSII were more abundant in low light (D-library) rather than in high light (S-library), and this difference was particularly strong for PSI (PSI: 2/19, PSII 19/24 reads in S- and D-library, respectively, Figure 2). Other striking qualitative differences were observed among stress response proteins. Universal stress proteins, as Zinc-finger, Metallothionein-like, Cytochrome P450, Caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase, Aquaporin PIP2 and S-norcoclaurine synthase were more abundant in the D-library (Table S2b), while other proteins involved in stress defense, Heat shock cognate 70 kDa, Ketol-acid reductoisomerase, and Acyl-CoA-binding protein were more abundant in the S-library. TUGs belonging to protein turnover, such as proteasome subunit alpha, E3 ubiquitin (F-box protein), ATP-dependent Clp protease proteolytic subunit (Table S2a) were more abundant in the S-library.
Figure 2. Expression Level of TUGs. Level Expression (number of EST) of TUGs associated to the different metabolic categories in shallow (white column) and deep (black column) conditions.
Peptide sequences from shallow and deep samples, their relative positive match against the different databases and their functional annotations are reported as in Tables S3a (shallow) and S3b (deep). Database search methods using the GPM and X!Tandem software combined with classical BLASTN searching method to identify peptide sequences, have allowed to assign the large portion of the identified peptides at proteins with known function, enhancing significantly our previous knowledge on the P. oceanica proteome. After eliminating redundancies (i.e., proteins common to the two sets of data), the total net protein discovery amounts exactly to 64 proteins, which were principally involved in photosynthesis and energy metabolism, with both structural and regulative functions (Figure 3). Mitochondrial and chloroplastic ATP synthase subunits were the most abundant. The chloroplast isoforms of ATP synthase, which take part to the Calvin cycle, were highly expressed in both light conditions, while the mitochondrial isoforms, which take part to respiration, appeared down regulated in low light. Proteins involved in photosynthetic metabolic pathways, such as oxygen-evolving enhancer proteins, were almost equally represented in the two conditions. Though most of the identified proteins showed little differences in number of peptides between the two conditions, 17 unique peptides were found only in shallow samples corresponding to as many proteins (Table 4A); meanwhile, in deep samples, 23 unique peptides that were not found in shallow ones have been assigned to 18 proteins (Table 4B). Summarizing the results, among the 64 newly identified proteins, 17 are exclusive of shallow samples and 18 of the deep ones as shown by the Venn diagrams (Figure 4). RuBisCO subunits, Chlorophyll a-b-binding proteins and Ferredoxin-NADP reductase (leaf isozyme) were more represented in the deep samples, while Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase was more represented in the shallow ones. Moreover, proteins with regulative activity, as the Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activase A and a 14-3-3-like protein, were also recognized as more expressed in shallow in respect to the deep samples.
Figure 3. Expression Level of peptides. Level of expression (number of peptides) associated to the different proteins in shallow, (white column) and deep (black column) conditions.
Figure 4. Venn diagrams. Venn diagrams comparing the total protein discovery with those found only in shallow or in deep samples. Among the 64 newly identified proteins, 17 are exclusive of shallow samples and 18 of the deep ones.
Discussion
The aim of this work was to investigate physiological acclimation in Posidonia oceanica plants along a bathymetric gradient, combining transcriptomic, and proteomic analyses. Plants were collected after the stabilization of the summer thermocline, when light and temperature regimes were well-differentiated between the two selected sampling stations (−5 and −25 m).
A not perfect match between transcriptome and proteome profiles was found, since some targets were identified only in one of the two datasets (e.g., F-box protein only among ESTs; RuBisCO only among peptides). Despite the correlation between transcriptomic and proteomic profiles is usually high (e.g., Guo et al., 2008), the effective level of observed accordance among these data varies in dependence of the system studied (Pascal et al., 2008; Vogel and Marcotte, 2012).
Furthermore, as also reminded from other authors (Feder and Walser, 2005; Diz et al., 2012) in interpreting differences in transcripts and peptides abundance, it should be taken in to account that many different regulative steps during transcription and translation processes influence the expression levels of mRNAs and their corresponding protein.
Besides the problem of reading correctly differences in genes and proteins expression profiles, a main question in combining transcriptional and proteomic data analyses is also in how to asses the interaction between them (Rogers et al., 2008; Huang et al., 2013). In the present work, data obtained from both analyses were discussed jointly, in order to asses the putative role and function of each target recognized in P. oceanica acclimation to depth.
Overall, our results suggested that a large portion of genes and proteins which were identified as putatively differentially expressed, could be assigned to three principal metabolic pathways: Photosynthesis, Cellular energetic metabolism and Protein turnover. Furthermore, pathways related to Signaling and Stress response, though similar in their overall expression between the two depths, showed different protein compositions.
Photosynthetic Processes
Light availability, both intensity and quality, influences directly and indirectly chloroplast metabolism (Jiao et al., 2007). The modulation of photosynthetic machinery is critical in the short term (day by day) and long-term (season, years) adaptation to environmental light. In photosynthetic organisms, the adaptation to different light conditions happens through adjustments of cellular homeostasis to maintain a balance between energy supply (light harvesting and electron transport) and consumption (cellular metabolism). The regulation of these mechanisms involves changes in the expression levels of both mRNA and mature proteins. During the sampling, the irradiance at the deep stand was about 1/10 of the irradiance present at the shallow stand, with values that are very close to the theoretical minimum light requirement estimated for P. oceanica (~9–16% of surface irradiance, Lee et al., 2007). Hence, many genes and proteins belonging to the photosynthetic machinery resulted differentially regulated between stands, in order to perform photosynthesis under such different light conditions.
Transcriptional and proteomic profiles showed high differentiation on Chlorophyll a-b-binding (Cab) proteins between the two depths. An increase of Chlorophyll concentration under low-light was reported for other seagrasses (Dennison, 1990; Sharon et al., 2011). In P. oceanica chlorophyll rate was reported to vary not only along the depth gradient, but also during different seasons (Pirc, 1986). In addition, differences among Cab proteins identified between depths, suggest that in P. oceanica different Cab proteins are utilized for the assembly of the antenna complex, in response to specific photo-acclimation processes. It seems that, to prevent photo-damage due to high-light, plants evolved different strategies, such as the shrinking of PSII antenna size (Escoubas et al., 1995) and thermal dissipation (Elrad et al., 2002). Changes in antenna pigments compositions in low- light were also suggested for P. oceanica and for other seagrasses by Casazza and Mazzella (2002).
The relative quantity of transcripts and proteins recognized in this study also suggests an increase in PSII and PSI transcripts in deep plants in respect to the shallow ones (especially as regards as PSI). Photosynthetic-organisms balance electron flow between the two photosystems by modulating both antenna size and photosystem stoichiometry (Chitnis, 2001), in response to light intensity and quality. The redox status of the whole cell and of the chloroplast and the ratio between ATP and NADPH could also contribute in modulating PSI/II relative abundance (Chitnis, 2001). PSI/II ratio was found modified across depth also in the seagrass Halophila stipulacea (Sharon et al., 2011), in macroalgae (Fujita, 1997; Yamazaki et al., 2005) and cyanobacteria (Levitan et al., 2010) as to indicate that this could be a general photo-acclimatory mechanism. At the present, we are not able to explain the regulative mechanisms underlying this differential modulation between shallow and deep plants, but similar patterns of PSI/II ratio were already observed in shallow P. oceanica meadows growing under different light conditions (Mazzuca et al., 2009). Authors reported a reorganization of the thylakoid architecture under low-light conditions, that is consistent with the rearrangement between the two photosystems, since approximately 85% of PSII is located in the apprised domains of the grana and 64% of PSI is located in the stroma lamellae.
Another interesting hint suggested from our data for the P. oceanica photosynthetic acclimation involves the enzyme RuBisCo. The expression pattern of this enzyme between the two light conditions was different from the expectation: we measured, in fact, a similar content of this protein between shallow and deep stations, with a slightly higher abundance in low-light, especially for what concern the large subunit. This is in contrast with previous results, where Mazzuca et al. (2009) showed a clear decrease of the same protein in low-light condition in P. oceanica. The activity of RuBisCo responds to different environmental signals including light, changes in source-sin balance, temperature and circadian rhythms [reviewed in Portis (2003)]. However, regulation of RuBisCo is mediated, among others, by the activity of the chaperone Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activase A (RCA). This protein was identified in our collection as over-expressed, even if at low levels, in low-light condition. RCA is thought to have a key role in the regulation of photosynthesis under different environmental stress conditions (Portis, 2003) and during the daily cycle (Yin et al., 2010). In a recently study of Yamori et al. (2012) it was reported that in low-light condition, high expression of RCA contributes to maintain RuBisCo in high active state, helping in assuring high levels of CO2 assimilation also under shade conditions. These observations open the question regarding the real regulation mechanism of RuBisCo in P. oceanica in response to light, especially for what regards limiting light conditions.
Cellular Energetic Metabolism
For what concerns respiration, an overall increase of related transcripts and proteins was recorded in shallow plants, probably related to the higher temperature present in respect to the deeper portion of the meadow plants [overview in Touchette and Burkholder (2000)]. Nevertheless, considering separately the regulation of each of the three main stages of the respiratory process, we see that glycolysis and electron transport chain steps were strongly enhanced in high light, while the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle was higher in low light.
The understanding of the regulations of these pathways in plants is further complicated by the interactions between them and many other key elements (Fernie et al., 2004). Among the putative regulatory enzymes of mitochondrial activity (Bunney et al., 2001), a protein like 14-3-3 was recognized in our peptide collections. Collectively, plant 14-3-3s isoforms, which bind to phosphorylated client proteins to modulate their function, are implicated in an expanding catalogue of physiological functions and are affected by the extracellular and intracellular environment of the plant. They play a central role in the response to the plant extracellular environment, particularly environmental stress, pathogens, and light conditions (Denison et al., 2011).
Stress Response
Several transcripts encoding for proteins associated with stress response and plant defense were detected in low-light. Amongst these, metallothionein-like protein, which are implicated in metal tolerance in plants (Cobbett, 2000), Catalase and Oxygen-evolving enhancer proteins, which respond to reactive oxygen species (ROS) stress and are responsible for the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide to oxygen and water (Blokhina, 2003) and also the Cytochromes P450 family, which is implicated in detoxification. It is known that P. oceanica may accumulate metals from the sediment in its organs and tissues (Warnau et al., 1996; Schlacher-Hoenlinger and Schlacher, 1998) and the study by Giordani et al. (2000) have demonstrated that treatments with Mercury, Copper and Cadmium may induce the production of Metallothionein proteins in this species. Moreover, in the deep plants several transcripts encoding for Zinc finger domain stress-associated proteins and the 2-caffeic-acido-methyl transferase, were also found. The same proteins were also previously recognized (Mazzuca et al., 2009) in P. oceanica in similar environmental condition and associated to biotic and abiotic stress response (Cozza et al., 2006).
All these elements suggest that plants living in the deep stands are more sensitive to oxidative stress than plants growing in shallow stands, due to the higher investment by the former in maintaining basal metabolism and the consequent lower resources available for cell defense and repair. In addition, deep plants could also respond to exogenous oxidative stress due to the local distribution of stressing factors, which seem to be more important in the area of the bay where the deep stand is growing.
Protein Turnover
Many clones with sequence homology on components of the (Ub)Ubiquitin-26S proteasome pathway were identified in both ESTs collections. This degradation pathway is involved in the removal of abnormal polypeptides throughout normal protein turnover, and provides the degradation of enzymes and key regulatory factors of signal transduction, making it one of the most elaborate regulatory mechanisms in plants, allowing cells to respond rapidly to signal molecules and changes in environmental conditions (Gagne et al., 2004; Moon et al., 2004). Higher expression level of ubiquitin/26S proteins was already found in P. oceanica as consequence of plants acclimation to low-light conditions (Mazzuca et al., 2009). Three components of this complex witch appeared to be more expressed in high-light condition in comparison with low-light are involved in “protein-targeting”: the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase, a U-box and RING-box protein and the SCF-E3, F-Box protein (Moon et al., 2004). The participation of SCFs in plant development is extensive, affecting processes such as hormone response, photo-morphogenesis, circadian rhythms, floral development, and senescence (Du et al., 2009). Moreover, several studies support that F-box proteins such as SCF E3, are also involved in phyA-mediated light signaling and in the regulation of circadian clock, making it possible that SCF proteins degrade a repressor of light response in preparation for light signals at dawn (Harmon and Kay, 2003).
Furthermore, plants growing at the different depths appear to respond not only to different environmental signals, but also to different endogenous signaling, such as hormones. In shallow plants, several component of the Ethylene signaling pathway were detected, such as the above mentioned F-box proteins. At present, information exists on the functions of a relatively small number of F-box proteins and most of these are involved in regulation of the hormone signaling pathway.
The role of the SCF is to degrade repressors of hormone response (auxin, GA, and JA), whereas in response to ethylene, the SCF degrades positive regulators in the absence of the hormone. The existing data strongly suggest that the principal control point of Ethylene signaling regulation is protein degradation via the ubiquitin/26S proteasome pathway (Potuschak et al., 2003; Kendrick and Chang, 2009). Ethylene is an important gaseous hormone's regulator in several plants processes, as (i) the regulation of endogenous rhythms, e.g., seed germination, plant growth, leaf expansion, root hair formation, fruit ripening, and timing of vegetative senescence and (ii) the transduction of environmental signaling, e.g., responses to abiotic stresses and pathogen attack (Potuschak et al., 2003; Raab et al., 2009). According to these indications, the different activity of ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis recognized between shallow and deep growing plants of P. oceanica could depend from the different seasonal timing at which they respond. Buia and Mazzella (1991) previously observed in the seagrasses P. oceanica, Cymodocea nodosa and Zostera noltii, a clear shift in life cycle between plants growing in shallow and deep stands in the Mediterranean Sea, with the effect that shallow plants (−5 m) complete their annual cycle in early summer, turning into senescence, while at the same time plants of the deep stands (−25 m) are fully growing. Our data about the photo-acclimation response of P. oceanica along the bathymetric gradient probably also reflect the different adjustments in life cycle during the year of plants growing at different depths. This allows plants to growth, optimizing the harvesting and the utilization of the available light in the different seasonal conditions and to minimize the negative effects due to photo-damage.
In conclusion, this study allowed to identify several regulatory networks and metabolic pathways involved in environmental signals response along the depth distribution of P. oceanica, and allowed to improve the available molecular resources, which is an important requisite for the application of eco-genomic approaches in this species.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
Authors thank the University of Calabria for funding the research grant 2009-2010, the Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn and the MIUR Italian Flagship project RITMARE for partially funding the research, the staff of the Molecular Biology Service and the group of Benthic Ecology of the Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn for their support in laboratory experiments and in field activity, the ESF COST Action (ES 0906) Seagrass Productivity: From Genes to Ecosystem Management, for providing fruitful discussion networks. The two anonymous reviewers are gratefully acknowledged for their thorough comments and suggestions.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://www.frontiersin.org/Plant_Proteomics/10.3389/fpls.2013.00195/abstract
Figure S1 | RT-qPCR SSH library. Expression levels of Pooc_B_c42 and Pooc_B_c 217 (y-axis, Mean ± SD) in Posidonia oceanica shoots collected at −25 m (deep-library). Shoots collected at −5 m (shallo-library) were used as control and the expression level of GOI in the control is represented in the figure by the x-axis. RT-qPCR data were normalized (A) with the best RGs in this experimental condition (EF1A, L23, NTUBC, Serra et al., 2012b), (B) using “universal” RGs (EF1A, NTUBC, 18S, and UBI) (*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001). Additional information on primers sequences and RT-qPCR conditions in Serra et al. (2012b).
Table S1 | Additional statistics features of SSH–EST library. Additional statistics features of SSH–ESTs Posidonia oceanica library.
Table S2a | List of Unigenes belonging to the shallow (high-light) library. List of Unigenes belonging to the shallow (high-light) library. Unigenes name, their functional annotation with the E-value, number of ESTs identified (S_EST) and sequences lengths (Length) are indicated. For each sequence, the presence of putative ORF (open reading frame), SSRs (simple sequences repeats) and SNPs (single-nucleotide polymorphisms) are also showed.
Table S2b | List of Unigenes belonging to the deep (low-light) library. List of Unigenes belonging to the deep (low-light) library. Unigenes name, their functional annotation with the E-value, number of ESTs identified (S_EST) and sequences lengths (Length) are indicated. For each sequence, the presence of putative ORF (open reading frame), SSRs (simple sequences repeats) and SNPs (single-nucleotide polymorphisms) are also showed.
Table S3a | List of peptides identified in the 1DE gel of proteins from shallow samples (S). List of peptides identified in the slices of 1DE gel of proteins from shallow samples (S), the protein attribution obtained with GPM and X!TANDEM sotfwares with the corresponding log(e) value, functional annotation obtained with TBLASTN search against Dr.Zompo database and corresponding E-value are shown.
Table S3b | List of peptides identified 1DE gel of proteins from deep samples (D). List of peptides identified in the slices of 1DE gel of proteins from deep samples (D), the protein attribution obtained with GPM and X!TANDEM softwares with the corresponding log(e) value, functional annotation obtained with TBLASTN search against Dr.Zompo database and corresponding E-value are shown.
References
Alba, R., Fei, Z., Payton, P., Liu, Y., Moore, S. L., Debbie, P., et al. (2004). ESTs, cDNA microarrays, and gene expression profiling: tools for dissecting plant physiology and development. Plant J. 39, 697–714. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02178.x
Ardizzone, G., Belluscio, A., and Maiorano, L. (2006). Long-term change in the structure of a Posidonia oceanica landscape and its reference for a monitoring plan. Mar. Ecol. 27, 299–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0485.2006.00128.x
Armengaud, J. (2009). A perfect genome annotation is within reach with the proteomics and genomics alliance. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 12, 292–300. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2009.03.005
Arnaud-Haond, S., Duarte, C. M., Diaz-Almela, E., Marbà, N., Sintes, T., and Serrão, E. A. (2012). Implications of extreme life span in clonal organisms: millenary clones in meadows of the threatened seagrass Posidonia oceanica. PLoS ONE 7:e30454. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030454
Blokhina, O. (2003). Antioxidants, oxidative damage and oxygen deprivation stress: a review. Ann. Bot. 91, 179–194. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcf118
Bruno, A., Bruno, L., Chiappetta, A., Giannino, D., and Bitonti, M. B. (2010). PoCHL P expression pattern in Posidonia oceanica is related to critical light conditions. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 415, 61–71.
Buia, M., and Mazzella, L. (1991). Reproductive phenology of the Mediterranean seagrasses Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile, Cymodocea nodosa (Ucria) Aschers., and Zostera noltii Hornem. Aquat. Bot. 40, 343–362. doi: 10.1016/0304-3770(91)90080-O
Bunney, T. D., Van Walraven, H. S., and De Boer, aH. (2001). 14-3-3 protein is a regulator of the mitochondrial and chloroplast ATP synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 4249–4254. doi: 10.1073/pnas.061437498
Casazza, G., and Mazzella, L. (2002). Photosynthetic pigment composition of marine angiosperms: preliminary characterization of mediterranean seagrasses. Gianna Casazza and Lucia Mazzella. Bull. Sci. Mar. 71, 1171–1181.
Chang, S., Puryear, J., and Cairney, J. (1993). A simple and efficient method for isolating RNA from pine trees. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 11, 113–116. doi: 10.1007/BF02670468
Chevalier, F., Martin, O., Rofidal, V., Devauchelle, A.-D., Barteau, S., Sommerer, N., et al. (2004). Proteomic investigation of natural variation between Arabidopsis ecotypes. Proteomics 4, 1372–1381. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200300750
Chitnis, P. R. (2001). PHOTOSYSTEM I: function and physiology. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 52, 593–626. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.593
Cobbett, C. S. (2000). Update on heavy metal stress phytochelatins and their roles in heavy metal detoxification. Plant Physiol. 123, 825–832. doi: 10.1104/pp.123.3.825
Costanza, R. (1997). The value of world'ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 287, 253–260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0
Cozza, R., Pangaro, T., Maestrini, P., Giordani, T., Natali, L., and Cavallini, A. (2006). Isolation of putative type 2 metallothionein encoding sequences and spatial expression pattern in the seagrass Posidonia oceanica. Aquat. Bot. 85, 317–323. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2006.06.010
Craig, R., and Beavis, R. C. (2003). A method for reducing the time required to match protein sequences with tandem mass spectra. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 17, 2310–2316. doi: 10.1002/rcm.1198
Craig, R., Cortens, J. P., and Beavis, R. C. (2004). Open source system for analyzing, validating, and storing protein identification data. J. Proteome Res. 3, 1234–1242. doi: 10.1021/pr049882h
Craig, R., Cortens, J. P., and Beavis, R. C. (2005). The use of proteotypic peptide libraries for protein identification. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 19, 1844–1850. doi: 10.1002/rcm.1992
Denison, F. C., Paul, A.-L., Zupanska, A. K., and Ferl, R. J. (2011). 14-3-3 proteins in plant physiology. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 22, 720–727. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2011.08.006
Dennison, W. C. (1990). “Chlorophyll content,” in Seagrass Research Methods, eds R. C. Phillips and C. P. McRoy (UNESCO), 83–85.
Diatchenko, L., Laut, Y. C., Campbellt, A. P., Chenchik, A., Moqadam, F., Huang, B., et al. (1996). Suppression subtractive hybridization: a method for generating differentially regulated or tissue-specific cDNA probes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 6025–6030. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.12.6025
Diz, A. P., Martínez-Fernández, M., and Rolán-Alvarez, E. (2012). Proteomics in evolutionary ecology: linking the genotype with the phenotype. Mol. Ecol. 21, 1060–1080. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05426.x
Doney, S. C., Ruckelshaus, M., Emmett Duffy, J., Barry, J. P., Chan, F., English, C. A., et al. (2002). Climate change impacts on marine ecosystems. Estuaries 25, 149–164. doi: 10.1007/BF02691304
Du, Z., Zhou, X., Li, L., and Su, Z. (2009). plantsUPS: a database of plants' Ubiquitin Proteasome System. BMC Genomics 10:227. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-227
Edge, S. E., Morgan, M. B., and Snell, T. W. (2008). Temporal analysis of gene expression in a field population of the Scleractinian coral Montastraea faveolata. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 355, 114–124. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2007.12.004
Elrad, D., Niyogi, K. K., and Grossman, A. R. (2002). A major light-harvesting polypeptide of photosystem II functions in thermal dissipation. Plant Cell 14, 1801–1816. doi: 10.1105/tpc.002154
Escoubas, J. M., Lomas, M., LaRoche, J., and Falkowski, P. G. (1995). Light intensity regulation of cab gene transcription is signaled by the redox state of the plastoquinone pool. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 10237–10241. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.22.10237
Feder, M. E., and Walser, J.-C. (2005). The biological limitations of transcriptomics in elucidating stress and stress responses. J. Evol. Biol. 18, 901–910. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00921.x
Fenyö, D., Eriksson, J., and Beavis, R. (2010). “Mass spectrometric protein identification using the global proteome machine,” in Computational Biology, Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 673, ed D. Fenyö (New York, NY: The Rockefeller University), 189–202. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-842-3_11
Fernie, A. R., Carrari, F., and Sweetlove, L. J. (2004). Respiratory metabolism: glycolysis, the TCA cycle and mitochondrial electron transport. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 7, 254–261. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2004.03.007
Foret, S., Kassahn, K. S., Grasso, L. C., Hayward, D. C., Iguchi, A., Ball, E. E., et al. (2007). Genomic and microarray approaches to coral reef conservation biology. Coral Reefs 26, 475–486. doi: 10.1007/s00338-007-0206-1
Fujita, Y. (1997). A study on the dynamic features of photosystem stoichiometry: accomplishments and problems for future studies. Photosynth. Res. 53, 83–93. doi: 10.1023/A:1005870301868
Gagne, J. M., Smalle, J., Gingerich, D. J., Walker, J. M., Yoo, S.-D., Yanagisawa, S., et al. (2004). Arabidopsis EIN3-binding F-box 1 and 2 form ubiquitin-protein ligases that repress ethylene action and promote growth by directing EIN3 degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 6803–6808. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401698101
Giordani, T., Natali, L., Maserti, B. E., Taddei, S., and Cavallini, A. (2000). Characterization and expression of DNA sequences encoding putative type-II metallothioneins in the seagrass Posidonia oceanica. Plant Physiol. 123, 1571–1582. doi: 10.1104/pp.123.4.1571
Gracey, A. Y. (2007). Interpreting physiological responses to environmental change through gene expression profiling. J. Exp. Biol. 210, 1584–1592. doi: 10.1242/jeb.004333
Green, E. P., and Short, F. T. (2003). World Atlas of Seagrasses. Prepared by the UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Guo, Y., Xiao, P., Lei, S., Deng, F., Xiao, G. G., Liu, Y., et al. (2008). How is mRNA expression predictive for protein expression? A correlation study on human circulating monocytes. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 40, 426–436. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7270.2008.00418.x
Harmon, F. G., and Kay, S. A. (2003). The F box protein AFR is a positive regulator of phytochrome A-mediated light signaling. Curr. Biol. 13, 2091–2096. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2003.11.019
Hill, J. K., Griffiths, H. M., and Thomas, C. D. (2010). “Climate change and evolutionary adaptations at species' range margins,” in Annual Review of Entomology, Vol. 56, eds M. R. Berenbaum, R. T. Carde, and G. E. Robinson, 143–159. Available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144746 doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144746
Hofmann, G. E., Burnaford, J. L., and Fielman, K. T. (2005). Genomics-fueled approaches to current challenges in marine ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 305–311. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.03.006
Huang, S.-S. C., Clarke, D. C., Gosline, S. J. C., Labadorf, A., Chouinard, C. R., Gordon, W., et al. (2013). Linking proteomic and transcriptional data through the interactome and epigenome reveals a map of oncogene-induced signaling. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9:e1002887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002887
Huang, X. (1999). CAP3: a DNA sequence assembly program. Genome Res. 9, 868–877. doi: 10.1101/gr.9.9.868
Jiao, Y., Lau, O. S., and Deng, X. W. (2007). Light-regulated transcriptional networks in higher plants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 217–230. doi: 10.1038/nrg2049
Jones, H., Ostrowski, M., and Scanlan, D. J. (2006). A suppression subtractive hybridization approach reveals niche-specific genes that may be involved in predator avoidance in marine Synechococcus isolates. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72, 2730–2737. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.4.2730-2737.2006
Karr, T. L. (2008). Application of proteomics to ecology and population biology. Heredity 100, 200–206. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6801008
Kassahn, K. S., Crozier, R. H., Poertner, H. O., and Caley, M. J. (2009). Animal performance and stress: responses and tolerance limits at different levels of biological organisation. Biol. Rev. 84, 277–292. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00073.x
Kendrick, M. D., and Chang, C. (2009). Ethylene signaling: new levels of complexity and regulation. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 11, 479–485. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.06.011
Larsen, P. F., Nielsen, E. E., Meier, K., Olsvik, P. A., Hansen, M. M., and Loeschcke, V. (2012). Differences in salinity tolerance and gene expression between two populations of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) in response to salinity stress. Biochem. Genet. 50, 454–466. doi: 10.1007/s10528-011-9490-0
Lee, K.-S., Park, S. R., and Kim, Y. K. (2007). Effects of irradiance, temperature, and nutrients on growth dynamics of seagrasses: a review. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 350, 144–175. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2007.06.016
Levitan, O., Kranz, S. A., Spungin, D., Prásil, O., Rost, B., and Berman-Frank, I. (2010). Combined effects of CO2 and light on the N2-fixing cyanobacterium Trichodesmium IMS101: a mechanistic view. Plant Physiol. 154, 346–356. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.159285
Liu, L., Zhou, Y., Zhou, G., Ye, R., Zhao, L., Li, X., et al. (2008a). Identification of early senescence-associated genes in rice flag leaves. Plant Mol. Biol. 67, 37–55. doi: 10.1007/s11103-008-9300-1
Liu, X., Zhang, M., Duan, J., and Wu, K. (2008b). Gene expression analysis of germinating rice seeds responding to high hydrostatic pressure. J. Plant Physiol. 165, 1855–1864. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2008.05.004
Maathuis, F. J. M., Filatov, V., Herzyk, P. C., Krijger, G. B., Axelsen, K., Chen, S., et al. (2003). Transcriptome analysis of root transporters reveals participation of multiple gene families in the response to cation stress. Plant J. 35, 675–692. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01839.x
Massa, S. I., Pearson, G. A., Aires, T., Kube, M., Olsen, J. L., Reinhardt, R., et al. (2011). Expressed sequence tags from heat-shocked seagrass Zostera noltii (Hornemann) from its southern distribution range. Mar. Genomics 4, 181–188. doi: 10.1016/j.margen.2011.04.003
Matsumoto, T. K. (2006). Genes uniquely expressed in vegetative and potassium chlorate induced floral buds of Dimocarpus longan. Plant Sci. 170, 500–510. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.09.016
Mazzuca, S., Spadafora, A., Filadoro, D., Vannini, C., Marsoni, M., Cozza, R., et al. (2009). Seagrass light acclimation: 2-DE protein analysis in Posidonia leaves grown in chronic low light conditions. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 374, 113–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2009.04.010
McArthur, L. C., and Boland, J. W. (2006). The economic contribution of seagrass to secondary production in South Australia. Ecol. Model. 196, 163–172. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.02.030
Metzker, M. L. (2010). Sequencing technologies – the next generation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 31–46. doi: 10.1038/nrg2626
Migliaccio, M., De Martino, F., Silvestre, F., and Procaccini, G. (2005). Meadow-scale genetic structure in Posidonia oceanica. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 304, 55–65. doi: 10.3354/meps304055
Moon, J., Parry, G., and Estelle, M. (2004). The Ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and plant development. Plant Cell 16, 3181–3195. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.161220
Morozova, O., and Marra, M. A. (2008). Applications of next-generation sequencing technologies in functional genomics. Genomics 92, 255–264. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2008.07.001
Orth, R. J., Carruthers, T. J. B., Dennison, W. C., Duarte, C. M., Fourqurean, J. W., Heck, K. L. Jr., et al. (2006). A global crisis for seagrass ecosystems. Bioscience 56, 987–996. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2006)56[987:AGCFSE]2.0.CO;2
Pascal, L. E., True, L. D., Campbell, D. S., Deutsch, E. W., Risk, M., Coleman, I. M., et al. (2008). Correlation of mRNA and protein levels: cell type-specific gene expression of cluster designation antigens in the prostate. BMC Genomics 9:246. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-246
Pasqualini, V., Pergent-martini, C., Clabaut, P., and Pergent, G. (1998). Mapping of Posidonia oceanica using aerial photographs and side scan sonar: application off the island of Corsica (France). Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 47, 359–367. doi: 10.1006/ecss.1998.0361
Pirc, H. (1986). Seasonal aspects of photosynthesis in posidonia oceanica: influence of depth, temperature aand ligth intensity. Aquat. Bot. 26, 203–212. doi: 10.1016/0304-3770(86)90021-5
Procaccini, G., Olsen, J. L., and Reusch, T. B. H. (2007). Contribution of genetics and genomics to seagrass biology and conservation. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 350, 234–259. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2007.05.035
Pop, M., and Salzberg, S. L. (2008). Bioinformatics challenges of new sequencing technology. Trends Genet. 24, 142–149. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2007.12.006
Portis, A. R. (2003). Rubisco activase – Rubisco's catalytic chaperone. Photosynth. Res. 75, 11–27. doi: 10.1023/A:1022458108678
Potuschak, T., Lechner, E., Parmentier, Y., Yanagisawa, S., Grava, S., Koncz, C., et al. (2003). EIN3-dependent regulation of plant ethylene hormone signaling by two arabidopsis F box proteins: EBF1 and EBF2. Cell 115, 679–689. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00968-1
Puthoff, D. P., and Smigocki, A. C. (2007). Insect feeding-induced differential expression of Beta vulgaris root genes and their regulation by defense-associated signals. Plant Cell Rep. 26, 71–84. doi: 10.1007/s00299-006-0201-y
Raab, S., Drechsel, G., Zarepour, M., Hartung, W., Koshiba, T., Bittner, F., et al. (2009). Identification of a novel E3 ubiquitin ligase that is required for suppression of premature senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 59, 39–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03846.x
Reusch, T. B. H., Veron, A. S., Preuss, C., Weiner, J., Wissler, L., Beck, A., et al. (2008). Comparative analysis of expressed sequence tag (EST) libraries in the seagrass Zostera marina subjected to temperature stress. Mar. Biotechnol. (N.Y.) 10, 297–309. doi: 10.1007/s10126-007-9065-6
Richards, C. L., Rosas, U., Banta, J., Bhambhra, N., and Purugganan, M. D. (2012). Genome-wide patterns of Arabidopsis gene expression in nature. PLoS Genet. 8, 482–495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002662
Rogers, S., Girolami, M., Kolch, W., Waters, K. M., Liu, T., Thrall, B., et al. (2008). Investigating the correspondence between transcriptomic and proteomic expression profiles using coupled cluster models. Bioinformatics 24, 2894–2900. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn553
Ruggiero, M. V., Turk, R., and Procaccini, G. (2002). Genetic identity and homozygosity in North-Adriatic populations of Posidonia oceanica: an ancient, post-glacial clone? Conserv. Genet. 3, 71–74. doi: 10.1023/A:1014207122382
Schlacher-Hoenlinger, M. A., and Schlacher, T. A. (1998). Accumulation, contamination, and seasonal variability of trace metals in the coastal zone – patterns in a seagrass meadow from the Mediterranean. Mar. Biol. 131, 401–410. doi: 10.1007/s002270050333
Schmidt, P. S., Serrao, E. A., Pearson, G. A., Riginos, C., Rawson, P. D., Hilbish, T. J., et al. (2008). Ecological genetics in the north Atlantic: environmental gradients and adaptation at specific loci. Ecology 89, S91–S107. doi: 10.1890/07-1162.1
Serra, I. A., Nicastro, S., Mazzuca, S., Natali, L., Cavallini, A., and Innocenti, A. M. (2012a). Response to salt stress in seagrasses: PIP1;1 aquaporin antibody localization in Posidonia oceanica leaves. Aquat. Bot. 104, 213–219. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2011.05.008
Serra, I. A., Lauritano, C., Dattolo, E., Puoti, A., Nicastro, S., Innocenti, A. M., et al. (2012b). Reference genes assessment for the seagrass Posidonia oceanica in different salinity, pH and light conditions. Mar. Biol. 159, 1269–1282. doi: 10.1007/s00227-012-1907-8
Sharon, Y., Levitan, O., Spungin, D., Berman-Frank, I., and Beer, S. (2011). Photoacclimation of the seagrass Halophila stipulacea to the dim irradiance at its 48-meter depth limit. Limnol. Oceanogr. 56, 357–362. doi: 10.4319/lo.2011.56.1.0357
Short, F. T., and Wyllie-Echeverria, S. (1996). Natural and human-induced disturbance of seagrasses. Environ. Conserv. 23, 17–27. doi: 10.1017/S0376892900038212
Spadafora, A., Filadoro, D., Mazzuca, S., Bracale, M., Marsoni, M., Cardilio, M., et al. (2008). 2-DE polypeptide mapping of Posidonia oceanica leaves, a molecular tool for marine environment studies. Plant Biosyst. 142, 213–218. doi: 10.1080/11263500802150316
Staden, R. (1996). The Staden sequence analysis package. Mol. Biotechnol. 5, 233–241. doi: 10.1007/BF02900361
Stapley, J., Reger, J., Feulner, P. G. D., Smadja, C., Galindo, J., Ekblom, R., et al. (2010). Adaptation genomics: the next generation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 705–712. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.09.002
Thimm, O., Bläsing, O., Gibon, Y., Nagel, A., Meyer, S., Krüger, P., et al. (2004). MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J. 37, 914–939. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02016.x
Thomas, C. D. (2010). Climate, climate change and range boundaries. Diversity Distrib. 16, 488–495. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00642.x
Thomas, C. D., Cameron, A., Green, R. E., Bakkenes, M., Beaumont, L. J., Collingham, Y. C., et al. (2004). Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427, 145–148. doi: 10.1038/nature02121
Touchette, B., and Burkholder, J. (2000). Overview of the physiological ecology of carbon metabolism in seagrasses. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 250, 169–205. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0981(00)00196-9
Vogel, C., and Marcotte, E. M. (2012). Insights into the regulation of protein abundance from proteomic and transcriptomic analyses. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 227–232. doi: 10.1038/nrg3185
Warnau, M., Fowler, S. W., and Teyssié, J. L. (1996). Biokinetics of selected heavy metals and radionuclides in two marine macrophytes: the seagrass Posidonia oceanica and the alga Caulerpa taxifolia. Mar. Environ. Res. 41, 343–362. doi: 10.1016/0141-1136(95)00025-9
Waycott, M., Duarte, C. M., Carruthers, T. J. B., Orth, R. J., Dennison, W. C., Olyarnik, S., et al. (2009). Accelerating loss of seagrasses across the globe threatens coastal ecosystems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 12377–12381. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905620106
Winters, G., Nelle, P., Fricke, B., Rauch, G., and Reusch, T. B. H. (2011). Effects of a simulated heat wave on photophysiology and gene expression of high- and low-latitude populations of Zostera marina. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 435, 83–95. doi: 10.3354/meps09213
Wissler, L., Dattolo, E., Moore, A. D., Reusch, T. B. H., Olsen, J. L., Migliaccio, M., et al. (2009). Dr. Zompo: an online data repository for Zostera marina and Posidonia oceanica ESTs. Database (Oxford) 2009:bap009. doi: 10.1093/database/bap009
Yamazaki, J.-Y., Suzuki, T., Maruta, E., and Kamimura, Y. (2005). The stoichiometry and antenna size of the two photosystems in marine green algae, Bryopsis maxima and Ulva pertusa, in relation to the light environment of their natural habitat. J. Exp. Bot. 56, 1517–1523. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri147
Yamori, W., Masumoto, C., Fukayama, H., and Makino, A. (2012). Rubisco activase is a key regulator of non-steady-state photosynthesis at any leaf temperature and, to a lesser extent, of steady-state photosynthesis at high temperature. Plant J. 71, 871–880. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05041.x
Yin, Z., Meng, F., Song, H., Wang, X., Xu, X., and Yu, D. (2010). Expression quantitative trait loci analysis of two genes encoding rubisco activase in soybean. Plant Physiol. 152, 1625–1637. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.148312
Keywords: Posidonia oceanica, acclimation, ESTs, proteomic, eco-genomic
Citation: Dattolo E, Gu J, Bayer PE, Mazzuca S, Serra IA, Spadafora A, Bernardo L, Natali L, Cavallini A and Procaccini G (2013) Acclimation to different depths by the marine angiosperm Posidonia oceanica: transcriptomic and proteomic profiles. Front. Plant Sci. 4:195. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00195
Received: 16 February 2013; Accepted: 27 May 2013;
Published online: 17 June 2013.
Edited by:
Mats Bjork, Stockholm University, SwedenReviewed by:
Ján A. Miernyk, University of Missouri, USANing Li, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, China
Copyright © 2013 Dattolo, Gu, Bayer, Mazzuca, Serra, Spadafora, Bernardo, Natali, Cavallini and Procaccini. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
*Correspondence: Silvia Mazzuca, Associate Professor in Plant Biology, Laboratorio di Proteomica, Dipartimento di Chimica e Tecnologie Chimiche, Università della Calabria, Ponte Bucci, 12 A, 87036 Arcavacata di Rende (CS), Italy e-mail: silvia.mazzuca@unical.it