Abstract
Future space missions and implementation of permanent bases on Moon and Mars will greatly depend on the availability of ambient air and sustainable food supply. Therefore, understanding the effects of altered gravity conditions on plant metabolism and growth is vital for space missions and extra-terrestrial human existence. In this mini-review we summarize how plant cells are thought to perceive changes in magnitude and orientation of the gravity vector. The particular advantages of several single-celled model systems for gravity research are explored and an overview over recent advancements and potential use of these systems is provided.
Introduction
Long term space missions will greatly depend on the availability of ambient air, sustainable food supply, and treatment of human waste, all of which can be enhanced and improved through the cultivation of plants on-board the space craft (Musgrave, 2007; Wheeler, 2010). Plants also provide calming effects and emotional benefits that can be pivotal in the confined environment of a space craft or orbital platform as they help astronauts to fight loneliness and depression. The positive psychological effects on the crew have the potential to reduce stress resulting from the living and working conditions during a mission (Williams, 2002; Zimmermann, 2003). Because of their multiple roles, plants will play a primordial role in future space missions and understanding the plant metabolic and morphogenetic responses to altered gravity conditions is indispensable for the development of space craft ecosystems or long term planetary colonization at the fractional gravity levels found on the Moon (1/6 Earth’s g) or Mars (3/8 Earth’s g).
Cultivation of plants on orbital platforms affects growth of organs and individual cells as was shown in many plant species (Cowles et al., 1984; Kuang et al., 1996; Wolverton and Kiss, 2009; Matsumoto et al., 2010) although in many of these experiments the observed phenomena were a result of the combination of the direct effect of the absence of gravity on the plant and of other environmental factors such as increased radiation or absence of convection. Unlike most biotic and abiotic types of stress which plants have been exposed to during their evolution, gravity is the only constant factor, both in direction and magnitude, to which plants had to adapt in a permanent manner. To withstand the mechanical load imposed by gravity on terrestrial organisms, plants developed mainly two strategies. The first is based on the generation of a hydroskeleton which creates an erectile force based on the balance between the internal turgor pressure and the mechanical constraint by a highly tensile resistant extracellular matrix, the cell wall. The second is based on the fortification of the cell wall through hardening that even in the absence of internal turgor allows the individual cells to stay upright against the effect of compressive forces caused by gravity (Volkmann and Baluska, 2006). Modification of cell wall composition is, therefore, a readily observed phenomenon in plants exposed to a change in g-force (Waldron and Brett, 1990). This type of response has been termed gravity resistance (Hoson and Soga, 2003). Experiments that are performed to study these architectural responses of plants to the effect of g-force are generally based on increasing its magnitude through placing the specimen into a centrifuge, or by decreasing it through exposure to omnilateral or true micro-gravity conditions (Hemmersbach et al., 1999; Hoson and Soga, 2003; Figures 1A,B). Omnilateral micro-gravity conditions can be produced in a clinostat or a random positioning machine by turning the specimen in rotary 2D motion or randomly in 3D, either at slow or rapid speed (Skagen and Iversen, 1999; Figure 1C). This does not actually alter the magnitude of the gravity force but it minimizes the effect associated with a unidirectional stimulus. True micro-gravity conditions can be achieved either on orbital platforms or during the free fall phase of sounding rocket and parabolic flights.
Figure 1
Plants do not only respond to a change in magnitude but also to a change in orientation of the g-vector. These responses are termed gravimorphogenetic and are typically expressed in form of a gravitropic behavior that is oriented in the direction of the g-vector (positive gravitropic) or opposed to it (negative gravitropic; Kiss, 2000; Hoson and Soga, 2003). Typical responses include the re-orientation of the root and the shoot of a plant that has been turned on its side. Numerous studies have investigated these gravitropic responses both in multicellular organisms and single-cells (Baluska and Hasenstein, 1997; Braun and Sievers, 2000; Kiss, 2000; Perbal and Driss-Ecole, 2003; Morita, 2010). Typical experiments include simple changes in the direction of the gravity vector by reorienting the sample (Figure 1D). However, these experiments are frequently also conducted under micro- or hyper-gravity conditions to enhance the response and analyze dose–effect relationships. Intriguingly, in multicellular organisms, the gravitropic response typically occurs at a location that is spatially separated from the cells that are responsible for the perception of the directional signal and thus requires long-distance signaling processes about which our understanding has significantly improved in recent years (Haswell, 2003; Morita, 2010). Auxin is an important mediator of gravity response in roots and shoots (reviewed by Morita, 2010). Gravitropism in Arabidopsis roots is controlled by basipetally transported auxin (Rashotte et al., 2000). Consistent with the important role of the hormone, transcriptomic studies have shown that the expression of genes related to auxin biosynthesis is altered by a change in gravity level (Tamaoki et al., 2011). Several auxin transporters from the PIN and PGP families are known to be involved in the distribution and the direction of auxin fluxes. The involvement of auxin and auxin transporters in gravisensing and graviresponse emphasize the importance of investigations into the regulatory mechanisms of the action of this hormone. For a thorough and up-to-date overview of auxin signaling, we refer to recently published reviews (Zhao, 2010; Wu et al., 2011).
The challenges of cultivating plants or plant cells at micro- or hyper-g are manifold ranging from the complexity and spatial limitations of experimental setups in space flight conditions and centrifuges (Musgrave, 2007) to the limited time of exposure that is possible during sounding rocket (duration of 10–12 min) and parabolic flight experiments (duration of tens of seconds; Luttges, 1992). The limited duration of these experimental setups highlights the advantage of biological systems that respond within the given time frame of the respective experimental device. While intracellular signaling cascades are triggered within 1 s upon the perception of an external mechanical signal (Hejnowicz et al., 1998), metabolic cellular responses in most plants can take up to several hours or days to be measurable thus providing a critical lower time limit for the duration of experimentation (Dutcher et al., 1994; Mullen et al., 2000).
While using entire plants is necessary to study the effects on plant growth, architecture, and reproduction, studies on cellular metabolism can potentially take advantage of single-cell experimental systems. These have the advantage of being easier to observe microscopically and other experimental conditions are easier to control. In the present review we present several single-cell plant systems that have been used in the past years and that present great potential for gravity research, in particular for the investigation of the effects of gravity on plant cellular functioning and metabolism. To introduce the open questions in this field of research, it is worth summarizing how plant cells are thought to perceive the orientation and magnitude of the gravity vector. Several conceptual models have been proposed on how plant cells perceive gravity stimulation.
Concepts of Cellular Gravisensing in Plants
Statolith-based gravisensing
In the statolith-based model, the gravity signal is triggered by the movements of small bodies inside the cytoplasm that are of higher density than the surrounding cytosol – the statoliths. The cells equipped with such statoliths are called statocytes. Statoliths typically consist of starch-containing amyloplasts or crystals such as those made of barium sulfate found in Chara rhizoids (Sievers et al., 1996; Kuznetsov et al., 2001; Perbal and Driss-Ecole, 2003). A change in the orientation of the gravity vector relative to the orientation of the organism causes the statoliths to sediment toward the new downward facing side of the cell and their movement results in the deformation of other sub-cellular structures (Figure 2A). It was thought for a long time that the moving particles exert a tensile stress on actin arrays which in turn influence the activity of membrane located mechano-sensitive ion channels (Baluska and Hasenstein, 1997; Sack, 1997; Hejnowicz et al., 1998; Morita and Tasaka, 2004). However, drug-induced disruption of the actin arrays enhances the gravity response in the roots of Arabidopsis and rice (Staves, 1997; Hou et al., 2004, 2003) as well as in Arabidopsis inflorescence stems and hypocotyls (Yamamoto and Kiss, 2002). Moreover, Arabidopsis mutants with reduced levels of starch-content are nevertheless able to perceive gravity signals (reviewed by Morita, 2010). Rather than the sedimenting motion it may therefore be the direct contact of amyloplasts with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) located in the periphery of the cell that triggers the signal (Zheng and Staehelin, 2001; Perbal and Driss-Ecole, 2003; Morita, 2010). High resolution electron tomography has revealed that the force of gravity on the mass of statoliths is sufficient to locally deform the membranes of the cortical ER (Leitz et al., 2009). Clear evidence for the action of statoliths was provided by the fact that magnetophoretic displacement of statoliths in roots and shoots of higher plants as well as Chara rhizoids was able to induce gravitropic curvature (Kuznetsov and Hasenstein, 1996, 1997, 2001; Weise et al., 2000). These studies highlight the usefulness of micromanipulator strategies for gravitational research (Geitmann, 2006a,b, 2007). While a local membrane bending by statoliths was proposed to act in gravisensing of root columella cells (Leitz et al., 2009), it has been shown that in moss protonemata, statoliths do not need to exert pressure. The simple contact with a receptor located at the susceptible membrane (in this case the plasma membrane) suffices to elicit the response (Limbach et al., 2005). Whatever the precise biochemical signaling pathway will turn out to be, according to the statolith-based gravisensing model the cellular response depends on the intracellular motion or displacement of some sort of particle or organelle that has a higher density than the surrounding cytoplasm and that therefore sediments to the lowest region of the cell upon the re-orientation of the latter relative to the gravity vector.
Figure 2
The gravitational pressure model
Most plant cells are not equipped with statoliths and a second type of gravity perception mechanism needs to be in place to explain the fact that these cells nevertheless respond to changes in g-force. Evidence for the presence of an alternative mechanism stems from studies on mosses, fungi, and algae which show gravity-dependent growth and differentiation without the presence of statoliths (Staves, 1997). In higher plants as well, a statolith-independent pathway seems to operate. Carefully adjusted rotation of roots that maintains the statolith-equipped root cap vertical during gravitropic bending does not cause the root to abolish the bending process. This supports the view that there is a second, statocyte-independent location in the root where the gravistimulus is perceived (Wolverton et al., 2002). While at times considered a controversy, it became clear that several mechanisms of gravisensing seem to operate, possibly even in the same cell (Barlow, 1995; Sack, 1997; Hasenstein, 1999; Kiss, 2000). The presence of an alternative mechanism can explain why Arabidopsis mutants unable to synthesize starch display an operating gravitropic response in roots and shoots albeit diminished (Caspar et al., 1985; Hatakeda et al., 2003; Soga et al., 2005; Buizer, 2007). The gravitational pressure model provides a possible but not necessary the only explanation for this phenomenon. It suggests that the entire mass of the protoplast acts as a gravity sensor that behaves similar to a water-filled balloon that flattens when placed on a surface due to its own weight. In this model the role of starch-filled amyloplasts would be that of increasing the overall density of the protoplast (Wayne and Staves, 1996). It is postulated that membrane proteins located at the top and bottom of cell may be activated through the action of differential tensile forces as they interact with the lower and upper cell walls, respectively (Wayne et al., 1992; Wayne and Staves, 1996; Figure 2B). Hitherto, the gravitational pressure model has been based on experimentation on the internodal cells of Characean algae and its relevance for graviperception in higher plants has yet to be demonstrated.
Tensegrity model
An alternative, but not mutually exclusive view, on how deforming forces acting on the cell as a whole could be perceived, is through the effect of cellular distortion on the mechanics or flexibility of the cytoskeletal arrays as explained by the tensegrity model of cell functioning. Although this model was developed for animal cells (Ingber, 1999), it could doubtless be transferred to plant cells. In this model, the exposure to micro-gravity decreases the internal pre-stress in the cytoskeletal array consisting of elements that resist compressive (microtubules) and tensile stresses (actin filaments). This conceptual model of cell functioning is based on the architectural principles by Buckminster Fuller (Ingber, 1993). The distortion induced change in preexisting force balance is supposed to affect local thermodynamic or kinetic parameters and thus biochemical activities (Figure 2C). How mechanical signals perceived at the cell surface could influence intracellular processes has been reviewed in detail (Ingber, 2006; Orr et al., 2006). However, the change in pre-stress of the cytoskeletal arrays does not necessarily need to be caused by the distortion of the outer shape of the cell but could also result from the gravity force acting on organelles attached to this network (Yang et al., 2008; Figure 2D). Finite element modeling has shown that the difference in density between the nucleus and the cytoplasm would be sufficient to cause a change in tensile stress that is significant enough to deform the cytoskeletal array upon application or removal of gravity (Yang et al., 2008).
While according to the tensegrity model the activities of numerous cytoplasmic enzymes are affected directly, the crucial mechanotransduction step in the statolith and pressure models is the deformation of a membrane (plasma membrane, tonoplast, mitochondria, ER) which in turn influences trans-membrane Ca2+ fluxes and consequently the cytosolic concentration of the ion (Fasano et al., 2002; Toyota et al., 2008). Although in statocytes and gravitactic unicellular organisms, calcium was shown to be involved in graviperception as well as in signaling processes leading to a graviresponse, in non-statocyte cells in higher plants, knowledge on calcium signaling involvement in graviresponse is scant (Sinclair and Trewavas, 1997; Kordyum, 2003), and warrants further investigation.
Single-Cell Systems Useful for Understanding Statolith-Independent Graviperception
Immediate and short-term responses can be difficult to assess in multicellular systems, and therefore the use of single-cells in culture has been a successful alternative approach that complements our understanding of graviperception and responses in plants. Handling of single-cells is generally easier (although typically sterile conditions have to be ensured) and depending on the parameter of interest, the response can often be observed shortly after application of the environmental trigger. Moreover, microscopy is facilitated since no neighboring cells obstruct the view, thus allowing for high spatial and temporal resolution imaging. Finally, reproducible growth conditions are more readily achieved in cell cultures since parameters such as temperature, nutrient concentrations, and pH can be tightly controlled.
Among the most intensively studied single-cell systems investigated in micro-gravity research are the protonemata and rhizoids of mosses and Chara, a freshwater alga. Although these cells are part of a multicellular organism, they are tip-growing individual cells which makes them readily accessible to microscopic observation. Furthermore, gravity perception and response occur in the same cell. Both protonemata and rhizoids are equipped with statoliths and important information has been gained from numerous studies on these organisms which have been exhaustively reviewed (Schwuchow et al., 1990, 1995; Sievers et al., 1996; Braun, 1997; Sack, 1997; Demkiv et al., 1999; Braun and Sievers, 2000; Braun and Wasteneys, 2000; Braun and Limbach, 2006). In the following, we will confine our overview to studies performed on single plant cell systems that are not equipped with statoliths and that offer the possibility to assess how gravity or the absence thereof affect basic plant cell functioning and metabolism.
Cell wall assembly in protoplasts
The molecular architecture of the cell wall and, by consequence, its mechanical behavior are known to be affected in many but not all plants grown under micro- and hyper-gravity conditions (Cowles et al., 1984; Waldron and Brett, 1990; Nedukha et al., 1994; Hoson et al., 1996; Nedukha, 1996; Soga et al., 1999a,b, 2001; Levine et al., 2001). Therefore, the investigation of altered g-force on the kinetics of the cell wall assembly process is of considerable interest. Single-cell studies to this end have been conducted on protoplasts generated from different plant systems. After the enzymatic removal of the cell wall, protoplasts generally start to regenerate a new cell wall. This is followed by cell division and formation of small cell aggregates few days later. These aggregates develop into callus tissue and, under suitable conditions, into mature plants. It is in particular the ability to regenerate mature plants from protoplast cultures that makes this experimental system interesting for applications in space exploration. Under micro-gravity conditions, cell wall formation in protoplasts isolated from Brassica napus, Daucus carota, and Solanum tuberosum is significantly delayed compared with the control samples at 1-g (Nedukha et al., 1994; Rasmussen et al., 1994, 1992). In particular, the content of structural components such as cellulose and hemicellulose is reduced whereas pectin is unaltered (Nedukha, 1998; Skagen and Iversen, 2000). These micro-gravity induced delays in protoplast regeneration also slow callus formation but do not prevent the process. However, under micro-g conditions development of intact plants is hampered, since calluses develop either roots or shoots, but not both (Iversen et al., 1999).
In these studies, peroxidase activity was measured in the regenerating protoplasts and revealed a decrease in enzyme activity compared to the ground control (Rasmussen et al., 1992). Since peroxidase activity is involved in cell wall metabolism and cross-linking of microfibrils, this reduced activity was proposed to provide a possible explanation for the observed slow-down in cell wall regeneration. However, later experiments showed that factors other than weightlessness (such as cosmic radiation) may have contributed to or even caused this change in peroxidase activity (Skagen and Iversen, 2000).
Interestingly, another cellular feature may be the reason for retarded cell wall deposition, in particular reduced cellulose deposition: the cortical microtubule cytoskeleton. The amount of cortical microtubules at 24 h after protoplast isolation is greater in protoplasts cultured at 1-g than under micro-gravity (Skagen and Iversen, 2000). Moreover, while cortical microtubules assessed at 24 h after cell wall removal in recovering rapeseed protoplasts are organized in parallel arrays, they are randomly oriented in the 0-g sample and hence unaltered from those of the protoplast immediately after cell wall removal. Since cortical microtubules play an important role in cellulose microfibril deposition (Emons et al., 2007), the failure to reorganize may certainly influence the capacity of the cell to fully regenerate its wall, and subsequently, to divide.
Calcium fluxes in polar fern spores
One of the single-cell systems capable of a gravitropic response is the gametophyte of the fern Ceratopteris richardii. During the first 24 h of germination, the gravity vector determines the axis of development of the spore by setting an asymmetrical growth polarity creating two asymmetrical cells that will grow parallel to gravity in opposite directions (Edwards and Roux, 1998; Chatterjee and Roux, 2000). When developed in micro-gravity conditions, the spores are able to germinate but lose the spatial polarity (Roux et al., 2003). The same pattern was observed when calcium channel blockers or inhibitors such as nifedipine and eosin yellow were added to the culture medium after germination initiation (Chatterjee et al., 2000). Efflux of calcium at different cellular regions was recorded using ion selective electrodes on spores grown at 1-g and spores grown during parabolic flights (the g level fluctuated between micro-g and 1.8-g). The results revealed that the specific activation of mechano-sensitive calcium channels at the bottom of the cell is required for graviperception (Chatterjee and Roux, 2000; Salmi et al., 2011). These data confirm the notion that calcium fluxes are involved in graviperception in multicellular plants (Sinclair and Trewavas, 1997; Fasano et al., 2002; Soga et al., 2002; Hoson et al., 2010). Use of the fern spore system allowed for facilitated microscopical access and measurement of ion fluxes compared to the multicellular root cell systems. However, the mechanism by which the channels are activated and the pathways that are involved in the transduction of the gravity-dependent response are yet to be determined. Progress on the understanding of the molecular mechanism will certainly profit from advances made on other mechanoperceptive cellular systems (Orr et al., 2006; Poirier and Iglesias, 2007).
Microtubule cytoskeleton in BY-2 cells
The microtubule cytoskeleton has multiple functions in plant cells including the guidance of the intracellular motion of organelles, the targeting of enzymes involved in cell wall assembly, chromosome separation, and cell plate formation during mitosis. When and where microtubules are assembled from tubulin and disassembled, therefore, is pivotal for cellular functioning. In weightlessness, isolated tubulin does not self-organize into parallel microtubule bands as it does in the same in vitro conditions on the ground (Papaseit et al., 2000). Similarly, in different types of cultured mammalian cells, the organization of the microtubule cytoskeleton is affected under real or omnilateral micro-gravity conditions (Lewis et al., 1998; Rösner et al., 2006). The finding that microtubules in regenerating protoplasts cultured under micro-gravity conditions were less organized than in the ground control provided a motivation for investigating the microtubule cytoskeleton in cultures of other single plant cell types. Similar to the protoplasts, microtubules in cultured cells dedifferentiated from tobacco hypocotyls at 1-g were more abundant than their counterpart grown in micro-gravity (Sato et al., 1999). The microtubules of a third single-celled system, tobacco BY-2 cells, were found to be less susceptible to a change in g-force, on the other hand. The BY-2 cell line was established from a callus induced on a seedling of Nicotiana tabacum cultivar Bright Yellow-2. Tobacco BY-2 cells grow rapidly in suspension culture and can multiply their numbers up to 100-fold within 1 week in adequate culture medium. Remarkably, exposure of BY-2 cells to micro-gravity conditions did not have any effect on cell division or cell growth. The organization of cortical microtubules was identical to that in cells cultured on Earth, and the orientation of newly deposited cellulose microfibrils was unaltered (Sieberer et al., 2009). Therefore, the tissue context does not seem to be a prerequisite for these cells to ensure cytoskeletal ordering under weightlessness. Rather it seems that the absence of a cell wall hampers microtubule organization during the initial phase of protoplast regeneration. This is consistent with the observation that microtubules in plant cells tend to align parallel to the principal direction of stress and thus respond to mechanical cues (Hush and Overall, 1991; Geitmann et al., 1997; Hamant et al., 2008). In line with this, the expression of tubulin genes is upregulated by hyper-gravity in Arabidopsis hypocotyls (Matsumoto et al., 2007) and cortical microtubules are reoriented from transverse to longitudinal (Soga et al., 2006). In tubulin mutants of Arabidopsis displaying twisted growth, hyper-gravity caused a more pronounced twisting phenotype and microtubule re-orientation was more prominent (Matsumoto et al., 2010). This led to the hypothesis that by influencing cellulose deposition, microtubules play an important role in the maintenance of a normal growth phenotype against the gravitational force (Hoson et al., 2010).
Endomembrane trafficking in the pollen tube
Experiments placed on parabolic flight and sounding rockets only make sense if the organism or cell displays a response to micro-gravity that appears within the short duration of weightlessness achieved during the flight. Assessment of both cellular growth and metabolism using these devices can therefore be exploited with cell systems in which both parameters are highly active and change rapidly upon exposure to a trigger. The fastest growing plant cell is the pollen tube, a cellular protrusion formed by the pollen grain upon contact with the receptive stigma. The pollen tube is responsible for fertilization in higher plants and hence crucial for seed and fruit formation. Pollen tubes, like protonemata, rhizoids, root hairs, fungal hyphae, and neurons, are tip-growing cells. The growth rates of pollen tubes can be up to hundreds of micrometers per minute and sustaining this process requires the continuous deposition of cell wall material in highly controlled manner to ensure morphogenesis of a perfectly cylindrical shape (Figure 3).
Figure 3
The development of the pollen grain, or microgametophyte, occurs in the anther and comprises several, precisely regulated cell divisions (meiotic and mitotic), the assembly of a highly structured and extremely resistant cell wall, and the coordinated activation of the cytoskeleton (Honys et al., 2006; Bou Daher et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2011). Long term studies on orbital platforms have shown that pollen formation was aborted at early stages and young microspores were deformed and empty. In late developmental stages, the pollen exine was able to form but the cytoplasm seemed contracted and became disorganized (Kuang et al., 1995). However, rather than an effect of micro-gravity, these phenomena were found to be a consequence of the reduced carbon dioxide environment due to lack of convective air movement. When plants were grown in high CO2 atmosphere, pollen with normal outer morphology could be obtained from Arabidopsis and Brassica. However, although the percentage of viable pollen was much higher than during the earlier experiment, fertilization did not occur (Kuang et al., 1996). Optical and electron microscopy showed that pollen grains developed in micro-gravity displayed differences in size, shape, number of mitochondria as well as an abundant presence of large starch grains absent in the pollen that developed on the ground (Kuang et al., 1995, 2005). When environmental conditions at micro-g such as CO2, light and convection were more carefully controlled, it was possible to obtain viable embryos, seeds, and siliques in Arabidopsis and Brassica proving that pollen tube growth was indeed possible at micro-g (Musgrave et al., 1997; Popova et al., 2009).
At hyper-gravity the effects on pollen and fertilization vary significantly between species. While at 4-g seed set in Brassica was not affected (Musgrave et al., 2009a), the formation of siliques was significantly reduced in Arabidopsis (Musgrave et al., 2009b). The authors found this to be due to a reduced ability of Arabidopsis pollen tubes to germinate at 4-g. They propose that the increasing g-force caused the cytoplasm to exert higher than normal pressure on the cell wall disturbing the tip growth process (Musgrave et al., 2009b). The main metabolic activity of the pollen tube is the synthesis and the deposition of cell wall precursors which are indispensable for the continuing assembly of the elongating cell (Geitmann and Steer, 2006). The principal phenomenon responsible for the tube expansion is the exocytosis of vesicles containing pectins which occurs at high rates and is spatially and temporally regulated by a multitude of parameters (Chebli and Geitmann, 2007). Other cell wall components such as cellulose, xyloglucans, and callose are either deposited by exocytosis or directly synthesized at the plasma membrane. Each of these components plays a defined mechanical role during pollen tube growth and in each plant species these components are distributed differently forming a characteristic spatial profile (Geitmann and Dumais, 2009; Fayant et al., 2010; Figure 3). Intriguingly, the pollen tube is able to compensate for the lack of one of the components by overproduction of another (Aouar et al., 2010), demonstrating that sophisticated mechanical control mechanisms must be in place to ensure that the final product is functional.
Very conveniently, pollen tubes are easily cultured in vitro thus allowing high resolution microscopic observations. Crucial in the present context, the high growth rate entails rapid and easily visible cellular responses upon mechanical or chemical manipulation (Geitmann and Steer, 2006; Chebli and Geitmann, 2007). The responses of in vitro growing pollen tubes developing under micro-g conditions or during clinostat rotation vary between plant species. In Prunus persica pollen tubes grown in a clinostat, callose plugs were four times longer than those in the control tubes and callose was spread along throughout the tube (De Micco et al., 2006a,b) indicating that cell wall assembly under altered gravity conditions is affected. Unlike somatic plant cells in which an altered cell wall assembly clearly fulfills a structural purpose since it reinforces the cell wall against the mechanical stress to which it is exposed, the performance of a pollen tube would not really be improved by a stiffer cell wall. The cellular response is therefore likely unspecific and offers the unique possibility to study the fundamental effect of altered gravity conditions on plant cell metabolism.
Cell wall assembly in the pollen tube is ensured by a high rate of intracellular trafficking targeted toward the growing end of the cell (Bove et al., 2008; Kroeger et al., 2009; Bou Daher and Geitmann, 2011). Temporal and spatial control of the vesicle fusion responsible for cell wall assembly at the growing tip is required to determine the rate and direction of growth (Fayant et al., 2010). The influx of calcium through plasma membrane located calcium channels at the tip of the cells plays an important role in the temporal and spatial regulation of the growth process (Hepler, 1997; Feijó et al., 2001; Chebli and Geitmann, 2007). Exocytosis in the tip region is accompanied by membrane endocytosis to ensure a balanced deposition rate of cell wall and membrane material. The delicate equilibrium between exocytosis and endocytosis is disturbed when in vitro growing pollen tubes are exposed to micro- and hyper-g conditions. In micro-gravity, the uptake of a fluorescent phospholipid into pollen tubes, an indication for endocytosis, is increased, whereas the contrary is true for hyper-gravity conditions (Lisboa et al., 2002). Since pollen tubes are not gravitropic (De Micco et al., 2006b), they can therefore serve as model systems that allow the investigation of statolith-independent, non-gravitropic responses of plant cells upon altered gravity conditions. Moreover, understanding the performance of this cell is crucial for future applications in space flight as successful fertilization is essential for on-board production of plant-based food.
Conclusion
Experiments based on entire plants are inevitable to understand plant functioning under altered gravity conditions. Nevertheless, single-cell experimental systems have emerged as excellent tools that allow for in-depth studies of individual processes that are altered as a consequence of exposure to micro- or hyper-gravity conditions. It becomes increasingly clear that statolith mediated effects are not the only responses that contribute to plant behavior under altered gravity conditions. So far, each of the cellular systems mentioned above has been used to investigate particular aspects of cellular functioning. An important step forward will be the combined analysis of different processes on a single system to obtain a more holistic view of the involved mechanisms and to connect the dots. Secondly, identifying common principles shared by different cellular systems, as well as distinctive features that can be explained by the particular functionality of the cell wall will allow to make conclusions for general plant cell functioning. By way of example, cell wall regeneration was investigated in recovering protoplasts, but elongating tip-growing cells represent alternative systems that provides complementary information. The effect of gravity on the cytoskeleton has mostly been studied on comparably slowly developing cells such as BY-2 cells, but important information could probably gained from and short-term experimental devices could be exploited for systems in which these cellular features are highly dynamic such as growing pollen tubes. Ion fluxes, so far only studied in fern spores in the context of gravity research, could, and should equally be studied in other growing cells in which ion flux profiles have been established. Single-cell systems allow for the use of imaging methods that operate at high spatial and temporal resolution and will therefore enable us to determine the roles of sub-cellular features such as targeted transport processes and ion fluxes that lead to a tropic response or a change in metabolic homeostasis. It will then be possible to link these results to those obtained from transcriptomic and proteomic approaches, thus making sense of the overwhelming wealth of data that these types of studies produce (Martzivanou and Hampp, 2003; Martzivanou et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2006; Babbick et al., 2007; Barjaktarovic et al., 2007, 2009). An integration of cell biological and imaging approaches with quantitative information on the expression of proteins involved in cell wall synthesis, lipid metabolism, cell division, etc., will help to validate existing models and inform future models. Crucially, a multifaceted view will guide the development of new biomechanical and structural approaches to decipher the pathways of gravisensing and graviresponse.
Statements
Acknowledgments
Research in the Geitmann lab is supported by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies (FQRNT). Youssef Chebli is funded by the Ann Oaks doctoral scholarship of the Canadian Society of Plant Physiologists.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Glossary
- Gravimorphogenetic
Developmental change in response to the presence or the change in the orientation or magnitude of the g-vector
- Graviperception
The ability of a cell to become aware of the orientation or magnitude of the gravity vector
- Graviresponse
Physiological or morphogenetic response of a cell or a tissue to gravity induced trigger. The responding cell does not need to be identical to the perceiving cell
- Gravisensing
Perception of gravity stimulus
- Gravistimulus
Mechanical process caused by the presence or change in magnitude or orientation of gravity
- Gravitropism
Ability of a plant, organ or cell to orient its growth in the direction of the gravity vector
- Gravity resistance
Gravimorphogenetic response that serves to reinforce the organism or organ against the effect of gravity. Typically a reinforcement of the cell wall
- Mechanotransduction
Conversion of a mechanical stimulus into a chemical intracellular signaling pathway
- Omnilateral
From all sides
- Statocyte
Cell specialized in graviperception and typically equipped with statoliths
- Statolith
Intracellular body with density higher than the surrounding cytosol causing the body to sediment in the direction of the gravity vector. Either the sedimenting motion or the new position of the statolith provides the cell with information on magnitude and orientation of the gravity vector
References
1
AouarL.ChebliY.GeitmannA. (2010). Morphogenesis of complex plant cell shapes – the mechanical role of crystalline cellulose in growing pollen tubes. Sex. Plant Reprod.23, 15–27.10.1007/s00497-009-0110-7
2
BabbickM.DijkstraC.LarkinO.AnthonyP.DaveyM.PowerJ.LoweK.Cogoli-GreuterM.HamppR. (2007). Expression of transcription factors after short-term exposure of Arabidopsis thaliana cell cultures to hypergravity and simulated microgravity (2-D/3-D clinorotation, magnetic levitation). Adv. Space Res.39, 1182–1189.10.1016/j.asr.2007.01.001
3
BaluskaF.HasensteinK. H. (1997). Root cytoskeleton: its role in perception of and response to gravity. Planta203, S69–S78.10.1007/PL00008117
4
BarjaktarovicŽ.NordheimA.LamkemeyerT.FladererC.MadlungJ.HamppR. (2007). Time-course of changes in amounts of specific proteins upon exposure to hyper-g, 2-D clinorotation, and 3-D random positioning of Arabidopsis cell cultures. J. Exp. Bot.58, 4357–4363.10.1093/jxb/erm302
5
BarjaktarovicŽ.SchützW.MadlungJ.FladererC.NordheimA.HamppR. (2009). Changes in the effective gravitational field strength affect the state of phosphorylation of stress-related proteins in callus cultures of Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot.60, 779–789.10.1093/jxb/ern324
6
BarlowP. W. (1995). Gravity perception in plants: a multiplicity of systems derived by evolution?Plant Cell Environ.18, 951–962.10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00606.x
7
Bou DaherF.GeitmannA. (2011). Actin is involved in pollen tube tropism through redefining the spatial targeting of secretory vesicles. Traffic. [Epub ahead of print].10.1111/j.1600-0854.2011.01256.x
8
Bou DaherF.van OostendeC.GeitmannA. (2011). Spatial and temporal expression of actin depolymerizing factors ADF7 and ADF10 during male gametophyte development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol.52, 1177–1192.10.1093/pcp/pcr068
9
BoveJ.VaillancourtB.KroegerJ.HeplerP. K.WisemanP. W.GeitmannA. (2008). Magnitude and direction of vesicle dynamics in growing pollen tubes using spatiotemporal image correlation spectroscopy (STICS). Plant Physiol.147, 1646–1658.
10
BraunM. (1997). Gravitropism in tip-growing cells. Planta203, S11–S19.10.1007/PL00008098
11
BraunM.LimbachC. (2006). Rhizoids and protonemata of characean algae: model cells for research on polarized growth and plant gravity sensing. Protoplasma229, 133–142.10.1007/s00709-006-0208-9
12
BraunM.SieversA. (2000). Plant cells on earth and in space. Korean J. Biol. Sci.4, 201–214.10.1080/12265071.2000.9647546
13
BraunM.WasteneysG. (2000). “Actin in characean rhizoids and protonemata. Tip growth, gravity sensing and photomorphogenesis,” in Actin: A Dynamic Framework for Multiple Plant Cell Functions, eds StaigerC.BaluskaF.VolkmannP.BarlowP. (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 237–258.
14
BuizerK. (2007). GraPhoBox: gravitropism and phototropism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Microgravity Sci. Technol.19, 239–243.10.1007/BF02919490
15
CasparT.HuberS. C.SomervilleC. (1985). Alterations in growth, photosynthesis, and respiration in a starchless mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) deficient in chloroplast phosphoglucomutase activity. Plant Physiol.79, 11–17.10.1104/pp.79.1.11
16
ChatterjeeA.PorterfieldD. M.SmithP. J. S.RouxS. J. (2000). Gravity directed calcium current in germinating spores of Ceratopteris richardii. Planta210, 607–610.10.1007/s004250050050
17
ChatterjeeA.RouxS. J. (2000). Ceratopteris richardii: a productive model for revealing secrets of signaling and development. J. Plant Growth Regul.19, 284–289.10.1007/s003440000032
18
ChebliY.GeitmannA. (2007). Mechanical principles governing pollen tube growth. Funct. Plant Sci. Biotechnol.1, 232–245.
19
CowlesJ. R.ScheldH. W.LemayR.PetersonC. (1984). Growth and lignification in seedlings exposed to eight days of microgravity. Ann. Bot.54, 33–48.
20
De MiccoV.ScalaM.AronneG. (2006a). Effects of simulated microgravity on male gametophyte of Prunus, Pyrus, and Brassica species. Protoplasma228, 121–126.10.1007/s00709-006-0161-7
21
De MiccoV.ScalaM.AronneG. (2006b). Evaluation of the effect of clinostat rotation on pollen germination and tube development as a tool for selection of plants in space. Acta Astronaut.58, 464–470.10.1016/j.actaastro.2005.12.019
22
DemkivO. T.KordyumE. L.KardashO. R.KhorkavtsivO. Y. (1999). Gravitropism and phototropism in protonemata of the moss Pohlia nutans (hedw.) Lindb. Adv. Space Res.23, 1999–2004.10.1016/S0273-1177(99)00349-X
23
DutcherF.HessE.HalsteadT. (1994). Progress in plant research in space. Adv. Space Res.14, 159–171.10.1016/0273-1177(94)90210-0
24
EdwardsE. S.RouxS. J. (1998). Influence of gravity and light on the developmental polarity of Ceratopteris richardii fern spores. Planta205, 553–560.10.1007/s004250050355
25
EmonsA.HöfteH.MulderB. M. (2007). Microtubules and cellulose microfibrils: how intimate is their relationship?Trends Plant Sci.12, 279–281.10.1016/j.tplants.2007.06.002
26
FasanoJ. M.MassaG. D.GilroyS. (2002). Ionic signaling in plant responses to gravity and touch. J. Plant Growth Regul.21, 71–88.10.1007/s003440010049
27
FayantP.GirlandaO.ChebliY.AubinC. E.VillemureI.GeitmannA. (2010). Finite element model of polar growth in pollen tubes. Plant Cell22, 2579–2593.10.1105/tpc.110.075754
28
FeijóJ. A.SainhasJ.Holdaway-ClarkeT. L.CordeiroM. S.KunkelJ. G.HeplerP. K. (2001). Cellular oscillations and the regulation of growth: the pollen tube paradigm. Bioessays23, 86–94.10.1002/1521-1878(200101)23:1<86::AID-BIES1011>3.3.CO;2-4
29
GeitmannA. (2006a). Experimental approaches used to quantify physical parameters at cellular and subcellular levels. Am. J. Bot.93, 1220–1230.10.3732/ajb.93.10.1380
30
GeitmannA. (2006b). Plant and fungal cytomechanics: quantifying and modeling cellular architecture. Can. J. Bot.84, 581–593.10.1139/b05-173
31
GeitmannA. (2007). Cytomechanical tools for plant gravitational biology. Gravit. Space Biol.20, 31–42.
32
GeitmannA.DumaisJ. (2009). Not-so-tip-growth. Plant Signal. Behav.4, 136–138.10.4161/psb.4.2.7633
33
GeitmannA.HushJ. M.OverallR. L. (1997). Inhibition of ethylene biosynthesis does not block microtubule re-orientation in wounded pea roots. Protoplasma198, 135–142.10.1007/BF01287562
34
GeitmannA.SteerM. W. (2006). “The architecture and properties of the pollen tube cell wall,” in The Pollen Tube: A Cellular and Molecular Perspective, Plant Cell Monographs, ed. MalhóR. (Berlin: Springer Verlag), 177–200.
35
HamantO.HeislerM.JönssonH.KrupinskiP.UyttewaaalM.BokovP.CorsonF.SahlinP.BoudaoudA.MeyerowitzE.CouderY.TraasJ. (2008). Developmental patterning by mechanical signals in Arabidopsis. Science322, 1650–1655.10.1126/science.1165594
36
HasensteinK. H. (1999). Gravisensing and plants and fungi. Adv. Space Res.24, 677–685.10.1016/S0273-1177(99)00399-3
37
HaswellE. S. (2003). Gravity perception: how plants stand up for themselves. Curr. Biol.13, R761–R763.10.1016/j.cub.2003.09.016
38
HatakedaY.KamadaM.GotoN.FukakiH.TasakaM.SugeH.TakahashiH. (2003). Gravitropic response plays an important role in the nutational movements of the shoots of Pharbitis nil and Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol. Plant.118, 464–473.10.1034/j.1399-3054.2003.00080.x
39
HejnowiczZ.SondagC.AltW.SieversA. (1998). Temporal course of graviperception in intermittently stimulated cress roots. Plant Cell Environ.21, 1293–1300.10.1046/j.1365-3040.1998.00375.x
40
HemmersbachR.VolkmannD.HäderD.-P. (1999). Graviorientation in protists and plants. J. Plant Physiol.154, 1–15.
41
HeplerP. K. (1997). Tip growth in pollen tubes: calcium leads the way. Trends Plant Sci.2, 79–80.10.1016/S1360-1385(97)88385-9
42
HonysD.RenakD.TwellD. (2006). “Male gametophyte development and function,” in Floriculture, Ornamental and Plant Biotechnology: Advances and Topical Issues, ed. Teixera da SilvaJ. (London: Global Science Books), 76–87.
43
HosonT.MatsumotoS.SogaK.WakabayashiK. (2010). Cortical microtubules are responsible for gravity resistance in plants. Plant Signal. Behav.5, 752–754.10.4161/psb.5.6.11706
44
HosonT.NishitaniK.MiyamotoK.UedaJ.KamisakaS.YamamotoR.MasudaY. (1996). Effects of hypergravity on growth and cell wall properties of cress hypocotyls. J. Exp. Bot.47, 513–517.10.1093/jxb/47.4.513
45
HosonT.SogaK. (2003). New aspects of gravity responses in plant cells. Int. Rev. Cytol.229, 209–244.10.1016/S0074-7696(03)29005-7
46
HouG.KramerV. L.WangY.-S.ChenR.PerbalG.GilroyS.BlancaflorE. B. (2004). The promotion of gravitropism in Arabidopsis roots upon actin disruption is coupled with the extended alkalinization of the columella cytoplasm and a persistent lateral auxin gradient. Plant J.39, 113–125.10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02114.x
47
HouG.MohamalawariD. R.BlancaflorE. B. (2003). Enhanced gravitropism of roots with a disrupted cap actin cytoskeleton. Plant Physiol.131, 1360–1373.10.1104/pp.014423
48
HushJ. M.OverallR. L. (1991). Electrical and mechanical fields orient cortical microtubules in higher plant tissues. Cell Biol. Int. Rep.15, 551–560.10.1016/0309-1651(91)90002-Z
49
IngberD. (2006). Cellular mechanotransduction: putting all the pieces together again. FASEB J.20, 11–27.10.1096/fj.05-5424rev
50
IngberD. E. (1993). Cellular tensegrity: defining new rules of biological design that govern the cytoskeleton. J. Cell Sci.104, 613–627.
51
IngberD. E. (1999). How cells (might) sense microgravity. FASEB J.13, 3–15.
52
IversenT.-H.JohnssonA.SkagenE.ØdegaardE.BeisvågT.ChingaG.AndreassenP.WoldA.KittangA.-I.HammervoldA.RasmussenO. (1999). Effect of a microgravity environment and influences of variations in gravity on the regeneration of rapeseed plant protoplasts flown on the S/MM-03 mission. ESASP1222, 103–117.
53
KissJ. Z. (2000). Mechanisms of the early phases of plant gravitropism. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.19, 551–573.10.1016/S0735-2689(01)80008-3
54
KordyumE. L. (2003). Calcium signaling in plant cells in altered gravity. Adv. Space Res.32, 1621–1630.10.1016/S0273-1177(03)90403-0
55
KroegerJ. H.Bou DaherF.GrantM.GeitmannA. (2009). Microfilament orientation constrains vesicle flow and spatial distribution in growing pollen tubes. Biophys. J.97, 1822–1831.10.1016/j.bpj.2009.07.038
56
KuangA.MusgraveM. E.MatthewsS. W. (1996). Modification of reproductive development in Arabidopsis thaliana under spaceflight conditions. Planta198, 588–594.10.1007/BF00262646
57
KuangA.MusgraveM. E.MatthewsS. W.CumminsD. B.TuckerS. C. (1995). Pollen and ovule development in Arabidopsis thaliana under spaceflight condition. Am. J. Bot.82, 585–595.10.2307/2445417
58
KuangA.PopovaA.McClureG.MusgraveM. E. (2005). Dynamics of storage reserve deposition during Brassica rapa L. pollen and seed development in microgravity. Int. J. Plant Sci.166, 85–96.10.1086/425664
59
KuznetsovO.BrownC.LevineH.PiastuchW.Sanwo-LewandowskiM.HasensteinK. (2001). Composition and physical properties of starch in microgravity-grown plants. Adv. Space Res.28, 651–658.10.1016/S0273-1177(01)00374-X
60
KuznetsovO. A.HasensteinK. H. (1996). Intracellular magnetophoresis of amyloplasts and induction of root curvature. Planta198, 87–94.10.1007/BF00197590
61
KuznetsovO. A.HasensteinK. H. (1997). Magnetophoretic induction of curvature in coleoptiles and hypocotyls. J. Exp. Bot.48, 1951–1957.10.1093/jxb/48.11.1951
62
KuznetsovO. A.HasensteinK. H. (2001). Intracellular magnetophoresis of statoliths in Chara rhizoids and analysis of cytoplasm viscoelasticity. Adv. Space Res.27, 887–892.10.1016/S0273-1177(01)00182-X
63
LeitzG.KangB.SchoenwaelderM. E. A.StaehelinL. A. (2009). Statolith sedimentation kinetics and force transduction to the cortical endoplasmic reticulum in gravity-sensing Arabidopsis columella cells. Plant Cell21, 843–860.10.1105/tpc.108.065052
64
LevineL.HeyengaA.LevineH.ChoiJ.DavinL.KrikorianA.LewisN. (2001). Cell-wall architecture and lignin composition of wheat development in a microgravity environment. Phytochemistry57, 835–846.10.1016/S0031-9422(01)00148-0
65
LewisM.ReynoldsJ.CubanoL.HattonJ.LawlessB.PiepmeierE. (1998). Spaceflight alters microtubules and increases apoptosis in human lymphocytes (Jurkat). FASEB J.12, 1007–1018.
66
LimbachC.HauslageJ.SchäferC.BraunM. (2005). How to activate a plant gravireceptor. Early mechanism of gravity sensing studied in characean rhizoids during parabolic flights. Plant Physiol.139, 1030–1040.10.1104/pp.105.068106
67
LisboaY. S.SchererG. E. F.QuaderH. (2002). Endocytosis in tobacco pollen tubes: visualisation and measurement of plasma membrane retrieval during different gravity conditions indicates gravity-dependence of endocytosis. J. Gravit. Physiol.9, P239–P240.
68
LiuB.HoC.-M. K.LeeY.-R. J. (2011). Microtubule reorganization during mitosis and cytokinesis: lessons learned from developing microgametophytes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci.2:27. 10.3389/fpls.2011.00027
69
LuttgesM. (1992). Recognizing and optimizing flight opportunities with hardware and life sciences limitations. Trans. Kans. Acad. Sci.95, 76–86.10.2307/3628022
70
MartzivanouM.BabbickM.Cogoli-GreuterM.HamppR. (2006). Microgravity-related changes in gene expression after short-term exposure of Arabidopsis thaliana cell cultures. Protoplasma229, 155–162.10.1007/s00709-006-0203-1
71
MartzivanouM.HamppR. (2003). Hyper-gravity effects on the Arabidopsis transcriptome. Physiol. Plant.118, 221–231.10.1034/j.1399-3054.2003.00092.x
72
MatsumotoS.KumasakiS.SogaK.WakabayashiK.HashimotoT.HosonT. (2010). Gravity-induced modifications to development in hypocotyls of Arabidopsis tubulin mutants. Plant Physiol.152, 918–926.10.1104/pp.109.147330
73
MatsumotoS.SaitoY.KumasakiS.SogaK.WakabayashiK.HosonT. (2007). Upregulation of tubulin genes and roles of microtubules in hypergravity induced growth modifications in Arabidopsis hypocotyls. Adv. Space Res.39, 1176–1181.10.1016/j.asr.2007.03.074
74
MoritaM. T. (2010). Directional gravity sensing in gravitropism. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.61, 705–720.10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092042
75
MoritaM. T.TasakaM. (2004). Gravity sensing and signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.7, 712–718.10.1016/j.pbi.2004.09.001
76
MullenJ.WolvertonC.IshikawaH.EvansM. (2000). Kinetics of constant gravitropic stimulus responses in Arabidopsis roots using a feedback system. Plant Physiol.123, 665–670.10.1104/pp.123.2.665
77
MusgraveM. (2007). Growing plants in space. CAB Rev. Perspect. Agric. Vet. Sci. Nutr. Nat. Resour.2, 65.
78
MusgraveM.KuangA.AllenJ.BlasiakJ.van LoonJ. J. W. A. (2009a). Brassica rapa L. seed development in hypergravity. Seed Sci. Res.19, 63–72.10.1017/S0960258509303360
79
MusgraveM.KuangA.AllenJ.van LoonJ. J. W. A. (2009b). Hypergravity prevents seed production in Arabidopsis by disrupting pollen tube growth. Planta230, 863–870.10.1007/s00425-009-0992-5
80
MusgraveM. E.KuangA.MatthewsS. W. (1997). Plant reproduction during spaceflight: importance of the gaseous environment. Planta203, S177–S184.10.1007/PL00008107
81
NedukhaE. M. (1996). Possible mechanisms of plant cell wall changes at microgravity. Adv. Space Res.17, 37–45.10.1016/0273-1177(95)00674-4
82
NedukhaE. M. (1998). Effects of clinorotation on the polysaccharide content of resynthesized walls of protoplasts. Adv. Space Res.21, 1121–1126.10.1016/S0273-1177(97)00199-3
83
NedukhaE. M.SidorovV. A.SamoylovV. M. (1994). Clinostation influence on regeneration of a cell wall in Solanum tuberosum L. protoplasts. Adv. Space Res.14, 97–101.10.1016/0273-1177(94)90122-8
84
OrrA.HelmkeB.BlackmanB.SchwartzM. (2006). Mechanisms of mechanotransduction. Dev. Cell10, 11–20.10.1016/j.devcel.2006.02.015
85
PapaseitC.PochonN.TabonyJ. (2000). Microtubule self-organization is gravity-dependent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.97, 8364–8368.10.1073/pnas.140029597
86
PerbalG.Driss-EcoleD. (2003). Mechanotransduction in gravisensing cells. Trends Plant Sci.8, 498–504.10.1016/j.tplants.2003.09.005
87
PoirierC.IglesiasP. (2007). An integrative approach to understanding mechanosensation. Brief. Bioinform.8, 258–265.10.1093/bib/bbm025
88
PopovaA.MusgraveM.KuangA. (2009). The development of embryos in Brassica rapa L. in microgravity. Cytol. Genet.43, 89–93.
89
RashotteA. M.BradyS. R.ReedR. C.AnteS. J.MudayG. K. (2000). Basipetal auxin transport is required for gravitropism in roots of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.122, 481–490.10.1104/pp.122.2.481
90
RasmussenO.BaggerudC. A.LarssenH. C.EvjenK.IversenT.-H. (1994). The effect of 8 days of microgravity on regeneration of intact plants from protoplasts. Physiol. Plant.92, 404–411.10.1111/j.1399-3054.1994.tb08828.x
91
RasmussenO.KlymchukD. A.KordyumE. L.DanevichL. A.TarnavskayaE. B.LozovayaV. V.TairbekovM. G.BaggemdC.IversenT.-H. (1992). The effect of exposure to microgravity on the development and structural organization of plant protoplasts flown on Biokosmos 9. Physiol. Plant.84, 162–170.10.1111/j.1399-3054.1992.tb08779.x
92
RösnerH.WassermannT.MöllerW.HankeW. (2006). Effects of altered gravity on the actin and microtubule cytoskeleton of human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. Protoplasma229, 225–234.10.1007/s00709-006-0202-2
93
RouxS. J.ChatterjeeA.HillierS.CannonT. (2003). Early development of fern gametophytes in microgravity. Adv. Space Res.31, 215–220.10.1016/S0273-1177(02)00749-4
94
SackF. D. (1997). Plastids and gravitropic sensing. Planta203, S63–S68.10.1007/PL00008116
95
SalmiM.ul HaqueA.BushartT.StoutS.RouxS.PorterfieldD. (2011). Changes in gravity rapidly alter the magnitude and direction of a cellular calcium current. Planta233, 911–920.10.1007/s00425-010-1343-2
96
SatoF.TakedaS.MatsushimaH.YamadaY. (1999). Cell growth and organ differentiation in cultured tobacco cells under spaceflight condition. Biol. Sci. Space13, 18–24.10.2187/bss.13.18
97
SchwuchowJ.SackF. D.HartmannE. (1990). Microtubule distribution in gravitropic protonemata of the moss Ceratodon protoplasma159, 60–69.10.1007/BF01326635
98
SchwuchowJ. M.KimD.SackF. D. (1995). Caulonemal gravitropism and amyloplast sedimentation in the moss Funaria. Can. J. Bot.73, 1029–1035.10.1139/b95-112
99
SiebererB.KieftH.Franssen-VerheijenT.EmonsA.VosJ. (2009). Cell proliferation, cell shape, and microtubule and cellulose microfibril organization of tobacco BY-2 cells are not altered by exposure to near weightlessness in space. Planta230, 1129–1140.10.1007/s00425-009-1010-7
100
SieversA.BuchenB.HodickD. (1996). Gravity sensing in tip-growing cells. Trends Plant Sci.1, 273–279.10.1016/1360-1385(96)10028-5
101
SinclairW.TrewavasA. J. (1997). Calcium in gravitropism: a re-examination. Planta203, S85–S90.10.1007/s004250050168
102
SkagenE.IversenT.-H. (1999). Simulated weightlessness and hyper-g results in opposite effects on the regeneration of the cortical microtubule array in protoplasts from Brassica napus hypocotyls. Physiol. Plant.106, 318–325.10.1034/j.1399-3054.1999.106309.x
103
SkagenE.IversenT.-H. (2000). Effect of simulated and real weightlessness on early regeneration stages of Brassica napus protoplasts. In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant36, 312–318.10.1007/s11627-000-0058-7
104
SogaK.HaradaK.WakabayashiK.HosonT.KamisakaS. (1999a). Increased molecular mass of hemicellulosic polysaccharides is involved in growth inhibition of maize coleoptiles and mesocotyls under hypergravity conditions. J. Plant Res.112, 273–278.10.1007/PL00013881
105
SogaK.WakabayashiK.HosonT.KamisakaS. (1999b). Hypergravity increases the molecular size of xyloglucans by decreasing xyloglucan-degrading activity in azuki bean epicotyls. Plant Cell Physiol.40, 581–585.
106
SogaK.WakabayashiK.HosonT.KamisakaS. (2001). Gravitational force regulates elongation growth of Arabidopsis hypocotyls by modifying xyloglucan metabolism. Adv. Space Res.27, 1011–1016.10.1016/S0273-1177(01)00176-4
107
SogaK.WakabayashiK.KamisakaS.HosonT. (2002). Perception of gravity stimuli by mechanosensitive ion channels in plant seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol.43, s182.
108
SogaK.WakabayashiK.KamisakaS.HosonT. (2005). Mechanoreceptors rather than sedimentable amyloplasts perceive the gravity signal in hypergravity-induced inhibition of root growth in azuki bean. Funct. Plant Biol.32, 175–179.10.1071/FP04145
109
SogaK.WakabayashiK.KamisakaS.HosonT. (2006). Hypergravity induces reorientation of cortical microtubules and modifies growth anisotropy in azuki bean epicotyls. Planta224, 1485–1494.10.1007/s00425-006-0319-8
110
StavesM. P. (1997). Cytoplasmic streaming and gravity sensing in Chara internodal cells. Planta203, S79–S84.10.1007/PL00008119
111
TamaokiD.KaraharaI.NishiuchiT.WakasugiT.YamadaK.KamisakaS. (2011). Involvement of auxin dynamics in hypergravity-induced promotion of lignin-related gene expression in Arabidopsis inflorescence stems. J. Exp. Bot. [Epub ahead of print].10.1093/jxb/err224
112
ToyotaM.FuruichiT.TatsumiH.SokabeM. (2008). Cytoplasmic calcium increases in response to changes in the gravity vector in hypocotyls and petioles of Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Physiol.146, 505–514.10.1104/pp.107.106450
113
VolkmannD.BaluskaF. (2006). Gravity: one of the driving forces for evolution. Protoplasma229, 143–148.10.1007/s00709-006-0200-4
114
WaldronK.BrettC. (1990). Effects of extreme acceleration on the germination, growth and cell wall composition of pea epicotyls. J. Exp. Bot.41, 71–77.10.1093/jxb/41.1.71
115
WangH.ZhengH. Q.ShaW.ZengR.XiaQ. C. (2006). A proteomic approach to analysing responses of Arabidopsis thaliana callus cells to clinostat rotation. J. Exp. Bot.57, 827–835.10.1093/jxb/erj211
116
WayneR.StavesM. P. (1996). A down to earth model of gravisensing of Newton’s Law of Gravitation from the apple’s perspective. Physiol. Plant.98, 917–921.10.1111/j.1399-3054.1996.tb06703.x
117
WayneR.StavesM. P.LeopoldA. C. (1992). The contribution of the extracellular matrix to gravisensing in characean cells. J. Cell Sci.101, 611–623.
118
WeiseS.KuznetsovO. A.HasensteinK. H.KissJ. Z. (2000). Curvature in Arabidopsis inflorescence stems is limited to the region of amyloplast displacement. Plant Cell Physiol.41, 702–709.
119
WheelerR. M. (2010). Plants for human life support in space: from Myers to Mars. Gravit. Space Biol.23, 25–34.
120
WilliamsD. (2002). “Isolation and integrated testing: an introduction to the Lunar-Mars life support test project,” in Isolation: NASA Experiments in Closed-Environment Living, eds LaneH.SauerR.FeebackD. (San Diego: Univelt), 1–6.
121
WolvertonC.KissJ. Z. (2009). An update on plant space biology. Gravit. Space Biol. Bull.22, 13–20.
122
WolvertonC.MullenJ.IshikawaH.EvansM. (2002). Root gravitropism in response to a signal originating outside of the cap. Planta215, 153–157.10.1007/s00425-001-0726-9
123
WuH.-M.HazakO.CheungA. Y.YalovskyS. (2011). RAC/ROP GTPases and auxin signaling. Plant Cell23, 1208–1218.10.1105/tpc.111.083907
124
YamamotoR.KissJ. Z. (2002). Disruption of the actin cytoskeleton results in the promotion of gravitropism in inflorescence stems and hypocotyls of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.28, 669–681.10.1104/pp.010804
125
YangC.WeiD.ZhuangF. Y. (2008). The force induced by organelles’ weight in the microfilament is in the range of 0.1-1 pN. Acta Astronaut.63, 923–928.10.1016/j.actaastro.2008.03.008
126
ZhaoY. (2010). Auxin biosynthesis and its role in plant development. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.61, 49–64.10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112308
127
ZhengH.-Q.StaehelinL. A. (2001). Nodal endoplasmic reticulum, a specialized form of endoplasmic reticulum found in gravity-sensing root tip columella cells. Plant Physiol.125, 252–265.10.1104/pp.125.1.252
128
ZimmermannR. (2003). Growing pains. Air Space31–35.
Summary
Keywords
gravity, gravitropism, gravimorphogenesis, hyper-gravity, micro-gravity, pressure model, statolith, statocyte
Citation
Chebli Y and Geitmann A (2011) Gravity Research on Plants: Use of Single-Cell Experimental Models. Front. Plant Sci. 2:56. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2011.00056
Received
04 June 2011
Accepted
05 September 2011
Published
28 September 2011
Volume
2 - 2011
Edited by
David Ehrhardt, Stanford University, USA
Reviewed by
Patrick H. Masson, University of Wisconsin–Madison, USA; John Z. Kiss, Miami University, USA
Copyright
© 2011 Chebli and Geitmann.
This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with.
*Correspondence: Anja Geitmann, Département de Sciences Biologiques, Institut de Recherche en Biologie Végétale, Université de Montréal, 4101 Rue Sherbrooke Est, Montréal, QC, Canada H1X 2B2. e-mail: anja.geitmann@umontreal.ca
This article was submitted to Frontiers in Plant Cell Biology, a specialty of Frontiers in Plant Science.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.