data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CORRECTION article
Front. Physiol. , 05 November 2024
Sec. Respiratory Physiology and Pathophysiology
Volume 15 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1516510
This article is a correction to:
Improved exercise ventilatory efficiency with nasal compared to oral breathing in cardiac patients
A Corrigendum on
Improved exercise ventilatory efficiency with nasal compared to oral breathing in cardiac patients
by Prisca E, Pietro C, Anja K, Laura S, Sarina H, Dominic K, Sabina G and Matthias W (2024). Front. Physiol. 15:1380562. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1380562
In the published article, Authors’ names were incorrectly written as “Eser Prisca, Calamai Pietro, Kalberer Anja, Stuetz Laura, Huber Sarina, Kaesermann Dominic, Guler Sabina and Wilhelm Matthias.” The correct spelling is “Prisca Eser, Pietro Calamai, Anja Kalberer, Laura Stuetz, Sarina Huber, Dominic Kaesermann, Sabina Guler and Matthias Wilhelm”.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: VE/VCO2 ratio, rapid shallow breathing index, exercise oscillatory ventilation, heart failure, nasal breathing
Citation: Eser P, Calamai P, Kalberer A, Stuetz L, Huber S, Kaesermann D, Guler S and Wilhelm M (2024) Corrigendum: Improved exercise ventilatory efficiency with nasal compared to oral breathing in cardiac patients. Front. Physiol. 15:1516510. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1516510
Received: 24 October 2024; Accepted: 25 October 2024;
Published: 05 November 2024.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2024 Eser, Calamai, Kalberer, Stuetz, Huber, Kaesermann, Guler and Wilhelm. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Prisca Eser, cHJpc2NhLmVzZXJAaW5zZWwuY2g=
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.