Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Physiol., 01 December 2023
Sec. Respiratory Physiology and Pathophysiology
This article is part of the Research Topic Asthma: Physiology and Pathophysiology View all 5 articles

Body mass index affects spirometry indices in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma

Xiaohu Wang&#x;Xiaohu Wang1Hui Gan&#x;Hui Gan2Yimin Wang&#x;Yimin Wang2Xinxin YuXinxin Yu2Jiaying AnJiaying An2Baoqing Sun,
Baoqing Sun2,3*Yi Gao
Yi Gao2*Zheng Zhu,
Zheng Zhu2,3*
  • 1Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, People’s Hospital of Yangjiang, Yangjiang, China
  • 2National Center for Respiratory Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
  • 3Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China

Background: Body mass index (BMI) is known to affect the outcomes of spirometry indices. However, its association with spirometry indices in COPD and asthma is less studied. We aimed to explore the impact of BMI on these patients.

Methods: Patients with COPD or asthma who completed bronchodilator tests (BDTs) between 2017 and 2021 were reviewed. Spirometry indices were compared among patients with COPD or asthma that were subclassified as underweight (BMI< 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (≥18.5 to < 25), overweight (≥ 25 to < 30), and obesity (≥ 30). Results.

Results: Analysis was conducted on 3891 COPD patients (age:66.5 ± 7.8 years) and 1208 asthma patients (age:59.7 ± 7.5 years). COPD patients classified as underweight demonstrated significantly lower values of pre-and post FEV1 (L, %), pre-and post FVC (L, %), and pre- and post-FEV1/FVC (all p < 0.05). In contrast, COPD patients who were overweight or obese exhibited higher values for pre-and post FEV1 (L, %), and pre and post FEV1/FVC (all p < 0.05). Within the cohort of asthma patients, those underweight had lower pre-and post FEV1 (L, %), pre and post FVC (L, %), pre and post FEV1/FVC %. Obese asthma patients displayed higher pre and post FEV1/FVC (all p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Significant BMI category differences in spirometry indices can be seen in patients with COPD or asthma. Both underweight and obesity could affect the diagnosis and severity of these diseases. Recognizing these effects is essential to better management and diagnosis of these patients.

Introduction

Spirometry plays a crucial role in the prognostication, diagnosis, and monitoring of chronic obstructive respiratory diseases, particularly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma (Liou and Kanner, 2009; Halpin et al., 2021). International guidelines recommend the use of spirometry indices, specifically the pre- and post-bronchodilator test (BDT) forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC values, for the diagnosis and evaluation of COPD and asthma (Pellegrino et al., 2005; Halpin et al., 2021; Stanojevic et al., 2021; Reddel et al., 2022). It is important to note that these spirometry indices can be influenced not only by age, sex, and race, but also by factors such as height, weight, and body mass index (Talaminos Barroso et al., 2018; Mozun et al., 2022; Shah et al., 2022).

The impact of COPD and asthma on the global population is significant both financially and medically (GBD Chronic Respiratory Disease Collaborators, 2020). Lung function tests, particularly spirometry indices, should be correctly employed for the detection and treatment of these illnesses, as well as for understanding the factors that may affect them (Dharmage et al., 2023). BMI is a crucial factor associated with the nature and severity of COPD and asthma. Higher BMI has been linked to lower all-cause mortality and a decreased risk of COPD, but conversely, lower BMI has been linked to an increased risk of COPD and its exacerbations (Guo et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2021; Shin et al., 2022). Furthermore, patients with asthma who have higher BMI also have higher respiratory burden scores (Klepaker et al., 2022). The effect of BMI categories on spirometry indices in COPD and asthma, however, has not been thoroughly researched. Therefore, investigations examining their connections are necessary.

In order to better manage, evaluate, and diagnose COPD and asthma, it may be valuable to recognize BMI differences in spirometry indices. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to explore the association of BMI with spirometry indices in COPD and asthma.

Materials and methods

Study design

This retrospective study included patients with COPD or asthma from the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University who had at least one BDT between 2017 and 2021. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (approval NO.2020124). BMI was calculated based on the measurement of height and weight from the BDT record. BMI categories were classified into underweight (BMI< 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (≥18.5 to <25), overweight (≥25 to <30), and obesity (≥30).

Study population

Patients who underwent BDTs between 2017 and 2021 and had been diagnosed with COPD or asthma were included in the study. COPD was defined as a post-BDT FEV1/FVC ratio less than 0.7 according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines (Halpin et al., 2021). Asthma was defined on the basis of a history of asthma diagnosis by a pulmonologist that met the diagnostic criteria of the Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines (Reddel et al., 2022). Exclusion criteria: 1) Quality control of pulmonary function testing was not acceptable; 2) Patients who had other chronic respiratory diseases, such as lung cancer, bronchiectasis, interstitial lung disease; 3) The weight or height value was incomplete.

Bronchodilator tests

BDTs were performed using the MasterScreen-Pneumo PC (Jaeger, Germany) and QuarkPFT (COSMED, Italy) spirometers (Wang et al., 2021). All test procedures and results interpretation were performed by trained technicians based on the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society guidelines (Pellegrino et al., 2005; Graham et al., 2019). At least three acceptable maneuvers were needed and the highest measurement is used. Spirometry parameters including FEV1, FVC, and FEV1/FVC were obtained and expressed as absolute and %predicted (%) values. Reference equations for predicted values of spirometry indices were using the Global Lung Function 2012 equations (Quanjer et al., 2012).

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as absolute numbers (percentages) in case of frequencies, median values and quartiles in case of continuous parameters. Count data were analyzed by using the χ2 test. Median inter-group comparisons were using the Kruskal–Wallis test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 26.0.

Results

Prevalence of BMI categories

A total of 3,891 (93.0% male, n = 3619) patients with COPD were included, with a mean BMI of 21.9 ± 3.5 kg/m2, age 66.5 ± 7.8 years. Among them, there were 675 (17.3%) underweight, 2,496 (64.1%) normal weight, 646 (16.6%) overweight, and 74 (1.9%) obesity. There were 1,207 patients with asthma included, mean BMI 23.9 ± 3.3 kg/m2, age 59.7 ± 7.5 years. Among them, there were 63 (5.2%) underweight, 707 (58.5%) normal weight, 393 (32.5%) overweight, and 45 (3.7%) obesity.

Demographic and clinical characteristics

Table 1 demonstrates the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with COPD. Patients in the underweight group were more likely to be older compared to the overweight group (p = 0.007). In addition, the obesity group showed a lower ratio of female patients in comparison with the underweight and overweight groups (p = 0.014). There were no significant differences among all groups in smoking status and symptoms including cough, sputum, and shortness of breath.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with COPD.

In asthma, patients in the underweight group were older than normal weight and overweight groups (p = 0.002). The obesity group had a lower ratio of female patients when compared with the normal and overweight groups. Same as patients with COPD, patients with asthma showed no significant differences among all groups in smoking status and symptoms. Detailed information can be found in Table 2.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 2. Demographic and clinical data of patients with asthma.

BMI categories difference in spirometry indices

Within the COPD cohort, the normal weight group was used as the reference, underweight group had lower pre-and post FEV1 (L, %), pre- and post FVC (L, %), and pre-and post-FEV1/FVC (absolute value, %) (all p < 0.0001). Overweight and obesity groups had higher pre- and post FEV1 (L, %) (all p < 0.05), and pre-and post-FEV1/FVC (absolute value, %) (all p < 0.0001). However, pre-and post FVC (L, %) showed no significant differences (Table 3; Table 4; Table 5).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 3. BMI category differences in FEV1 in patients with COPD.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 4. BMI category differences in FVC in patients with COPD.

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 5. BMI category differences in FEV1/FVC in patients with COPD.

Table 6, Table 7, and Table 8 showed results of patients with asthma that used normal weight group as the reference. Underweight group had lower pre-and post FEV1 (L, %) (all p < 0 .05), pre-and post FVC (L, %) all p < 0.05), pre-FEV1/FVC (absolute value) (p = 0.036), pre-and post- FEV1/FVC (%) (p = 0.035 and p = 0.010, respectively). Overweight and obesity groups had higher pre-FEV1/FVC (absolute value, %) (p = 0.026, p = 0.010, p < 0.0001, p = 0.010, and p = 0.004, respectively). Obesity group showed higher post-FEV1/FVC (absolute value, %) (p = 0.001 and p = 0.030, respectively). What’s more, obesity group had lower pre-and post FVC (L) (p = 0.022 and p = 0.006, respectively), and overweight group had lower pre-FVC% (p = 0.003). However, overweight and obesity groups had no significant differences in pre-and post-FEV1 (L, %) compared with the normal weight group.

TABLE 6
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 6. BMI category differences in FEV1 in patients with asthma.

TABLE 7
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 7. BMI category differences in FVC in patients with asthma.

TABLE 8
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 8. BMI category differences in FEV1/FVC in patients with asthma.

Discussion

In the present study, the association of BMI categories of spirometry indices in patients with COPD or asthma were analyzed, respectively. In COPD, the prevalence of underweight was much higher than in obese patients. Underweight could worsen the FEV1%, FVC%, as well as the FEV1/FVC (absolute value, %), conversely overweight and obesity could make FEV1% and FEV1/FVC (absolute value, %) much better in COPD patients. On contrary, patients with asthma showed higher prevalence of overweight and obesity than underweight. Within the cohort of asthma, underweight also decreased FEV1%, FVC%, and FEV1/FVC (absolute value, %), but overweight and obesity did not affect spirometry indices except FEV1/FVC.

In patients with COPD, the proportion of the underweight category is near 20%, moreover, this category was older than the normal weight category. According to a report from World Health Organization, undernutrition is among the key driver of other respiratory diseases, like tuberculosis (World Health Organization, 2022). It serves as a reminder that undernutrition in older COPD patients should be more closely monitored by patients and physicians. Conversely, patients with asthma had a higher prevalence of overweight and obesity. Obesity is regarded as a health epidemic worldwide (Afshin et al., 2017). In asthma, more attention should be paid to the effect of higher BMI categories on pulmonary function.

The association between BMI and lung function in respiratory diseases has been previously examined. Schaeffer et al. (Schaeffer et al., 2022) used linear regression to assess the association of BMI with lung function in interstitial lung disease. They found that total lung capacity and residual volume% were worse in patients with overweight and obese BMI, and the obesity was associated with a lower FVC%. What’s more, the underweight BMI category was also associated with a higher residual volume%. Lee et al. (Lee et al., 2022) explored the risk of impaired lung function among obese individuals without metabolic abnormalities, subjects with metabolically-healthy obesity had the highest FEV1% and FVC% but the lowest FEV1/FVC ratio compared with non-obese and metabolically unhealthy obese subjects. Another study included 72 men with COPD also showed that BMI was positively correlated with FEV1 (r = 0.275, p = 0.020) (Sami et al., 2018). Although there are some similarities to the results of previous studies, our findings have differences. We assessed both pre-BDTs and post-BDTs indices, especially the post-FEV1/FVC ratio< 0.7 is the most crucial parameter for diagnosing COPD, so it is important to assess the association of BMI with this parameter. In addition, our research found no significant difference in FEV1 and FVC but a higher FEV1/FVC ratio in obese asthma patients, which is inconsistent with Lee et al. (Lee et al., 2022). The lower trend of FVC and subtle change of FEV1 may be the reason for the higher FEV1/FVC.

The present study investigated the association of BMI categories with spirometric indices based on patients with moderate to severe ventilatory dysfunction in COPD and asthma. It demonstrates the harm of the underweight BMI category for pulmonary function in both COPD and asthma, which may be explained by nutrient deficiencies. Our findings on gained residual volume in underweight individuals are consistent with a previous study in interstitial lung disease (Schaeffer et al., 2022). In overweight and obesity groups, the higher spirometry indices in COPD were observed. It may due to restriction by the loading of obesity reduced hyperinflation from the balance of obstructive respiratory disease (Ora et al., 2009; Choe et al., 2018). However, excess fat not only promotes the secretion of a range of inflammatory factors, but fat accumulation can also cause internal organs to be squeezed, which affects the breathing of the lung function (Choe et al., 2018). Hence, the relationship between obesity and lung function in COPD patients remains to be further clarified. In contrast, the worse trend of FVC% were found in higher BMI categories in asthma. It is possible due to excess weight exacerbates the restrictive defect of asthma. A previous study also demonstrated reduced lung volumes in obese subjects without lung disease (Jones and Nzekwu, 2006).

Despite the study having explored the association of BMI with spirometry indices, it had some limitations. Firstly, the data we used was all acquired from BDTs, since most of the time BDT was completed when FEV1% < 70%, subjects with normal or mild severity ventilatory dysfunction would be mostly excluded. As a result, we could not know the effect of BMI on these populations. In the future, we should include these subjects to generalize the scope of the study. Secondly, the BDTs records we used were all from the Chinese population. Considering that race is one of the critical impactors of normal spirometry values, it is possible that BMI categories have different effects on other ethnicities. Additionally, we only evaluated COPD and asthma, other common chronic obstructive respiratory diseases, such as bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, etc., were not studied.

Conclusion

To conclude, the lowest BMI has a negative impact on spirometry indices in both COPD and asthma. Increasing BMI may positively affect pulmonary function in COPD. Pulmonologists and physicians should pay attention to these effects to better diagnose and manage patients. Maintaining a suitable BMI is important for patients with asthma or COPD. Weight maintenance should be embedded in the management of these illnesses.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (approval No. 2020-124). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

Study design and hypothesis generation XW, HG, YW, YG, and ZZ. Data acquisition, analysis, or interpretation XW, YW, XY, BS, JA, and YG. Chart review and manuscript preparation XW, HG, YW, and ZZ. Critical revision BS, YG, and ZZ. Funding was obtained by BS, YG, and ZZ. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China (202007040003); the Guangdong Basic and Applied Fundamental Research Fund (2020A1515110007); the Zhong Nanshan Medical Foundation of Guangdong Province (ZNSA-2020003, No. 202102010347; ZNSA-2020013); and the National Natural Science foundation of China (82100036, 82161138020, and U1801286).

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Xiangqing Hou who helped the statistical analysis.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

BDT, bronchodilator test; BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1s; FVC, forced vital capacity; %, %predicted.

References

Afshin A., Forouzanfar M. H., Reitsma M. B., Sur P., Estep K., Lee A., et al. (2017). Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years. N. Engl. J. Med. 377, 13–27. doi:10.1056/nejmoa1614362

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Choe E. K., Kang H. Y., Lee Y., Choi S. H., Kim H. J., Kim J. S. (2018). The longitudinal association between changes in lung function and changes in abdominal visceral obesity in Korean non-smokers. PLoS One 13, e0193516. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193516

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dharmage S. C., Bui D. S., Walters E. H., Lowe A. J., Thompson B., Bowatte G., et al. (2023). Lifetime spirometry patterns of obstruction and restriction, and their risk factors and outcomes: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. Respir. Med. 11, 273–282. doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(22)00364-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

GBD Chronic Respiratory Disease Collaborators (2020). Prevalence and attributable health burden of chronic respiratory diseases, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Respir. Med. 8, 585–596. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30105-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Graham B. L., Steenbruggen I., Miller M. R., Barjaktarevic I. Z., Cooper B. G., Hall G. L., et al. (2019). Standardization of spirometry 2019 update. An official American thoracic society and European respiratory society technical statement. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 200, e70–e88. doi:10.1164/rccm.201908-1590ST

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo Y., Zhang T., Wang Z., Yu F., Xu Q., Guo W., et al. (2016). Body mass index and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a dose-response meta-analysis. Med. Baltim. 95, e4225. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000004225

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Halpin D. M. G., Criner G. J., Papi A., Singh D., Anzueto A., Martinez F. J., et al. (2021). Global initiative for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease. The 2020 GOLD science committee report on COVID-19 and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 203, 24–36. doi:10.1164/rccm.202009-3533so

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jones R. L., Nzekwu M. M. (2006). The effects of body mass index on lung volumes. Chest 130, 827–833. doi:10.1378/chest.130.3.827

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Klepaker G., Henneberger P. K., Torén K., Brunborg C., Kongerud J., Fell A. K. M. (2022). Association of respiratory symptoms with body mass index and occupational exposure comparing sexes and subjects with and without asthma: follow-up of a Norwegian population study (the Telemark study). BMJ Open Respir. Res. 9, e001186. doi:10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001186

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee J., Park H. K., Kwon M. J., Ham S. Y., Lim S. Y., Song J. U. (2022). The effect of metabolic health and obesity on lung function: a cross sectional study of 114,143 participants from Kangbuk Samsung Health Study. PLoS One 17, e0266885. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0266885

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liou T. G., Kanner R. E. (2009). Spirometry. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 37, 137–152. doi:10.1007/s12016-009-8128-z

CrossRef Full Text

Mozun R., Ardura-Garcia C., Pedersen E. S. L., Usemann J., Singer F., Latzin P., et al. (2022). Age and body mass index affect fit of spirometry Global Lung Function Initiative references in schoolchildren. ERJ Open Res. 8, 00618–02021. doi:10.1183/23120541.00618-2021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ora J., Laveneziana P., Ofir D., Deesomchok A., Webb K. A., O'Donnell D. E. (2009). Combined effects of obesity and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on dyspnea and exercise tolerance. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 180, 964–971. doi:10.1164/rccm.200904-0530OC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pellegrino R., Viegi G., Brusasco V., Crapo R. O., Burgos F., Casaburi R., et al. (2005). Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur. Respir. J. 26, 948–968. doi:10.1183/09031936.05.00035205

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Quanjer P. H., Stanojevic S., Cole T. J., Baur X., Hall G. L., Culver B. H., et al. (2012). Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3-95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur. Respir. J. 40, 1324–1343. doi:10.1183/09031936.00080312

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reddel H. K., Bacharier L. B., Bateman E. D., Brightling C. E., Brusselle G. G., Buhl R., et al. (2022). Global initiative for asthma strategy 2021: executive summary and rationale for key changes. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 205, 17–35. doi:10.1164/rccm.202109-2205pp

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sami R., Sadegh R., Esmailzadehha N., Mortazian S., Nazem M., Zohal M. (2018). Association of anthropometric indexes with disease severity in male patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in qazvin, Iran. Am. J. men's health 12, 1023–1028. doi:10.1177/1557988318760053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schaeffer M. R., Kumar D. S., Assayag D., Fisher J. H., Johannson K. A., Khalil N., et al. (2022). Association of BMI with pulmonary function, functional capacity, symptoms, and quality of life in ILD. Respir. Med. 195, 106792. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106792

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shah H., Mali S., Ranga S., Jadhav C., Rukadikar A., Singh A. K., et al. (2022). Effect of body mass index on cardiorespiratory parameters among medical students: a cross-sectional study. Int. J. Physiol. Pathophysiol. Pharmacol. 14, 4–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Shin S. H., Kwon S. O., Kim V., Silverman E. K., Kim T. H., Kim D. K., et al. (2022). Association of body mass index and COPD exacerbation among patients with chronic bronchitis. Respir. Res. 23, 52. doi:10.1186/s12931-022-01957-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stanojevic S., Kaminsky D. A., Miller M., Thompson B., Aliverti A., Barjaktarevic I., et al. (2021). ERS/ATS technical standard on interpretive strategies for routine lung function tests. Eur. Respir. J. 60, 2101499. doi:10.1183/13993003.01499-2021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Talaminos Barroso A., Márquez Martín E., Roa Romero L. M., Ortega Ruiz F. (2018). Factors affecting lung function: a review of the literature. Arch. Bronconeumol (Engl Ed.) 54, 327–332. doi:10.1016/j.arbres.2018.01.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang Y., Chen W., Li Y., Zhang C., Liang L., Huang R., et al. (2021). Clinical analysis of the "small plateau" sign on the flow-volume curve followed by deep learning automated recognition. BMC Pulm. Med. 21, 359. doi:10.1186/s12890-021-01733-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

World Health Organization (2022). Undernutrition, poverty as well as HIV, diabetes and tobacco are among the key drivers of the TB_Poster.

Google Scholar

Zhang X., Chen H., Gu K., Chen J., Jiang X. (2021). Association of body mass index with risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Copd 18, 101–113. doi:10.1080/15412555.2021.1884213

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: asthma, body mass index, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, spirometry, obese

Citation: Wang X, Gan H, Wang Y, Yu X, An J, Sun B, Gao Y and Zhu Z (2023) Body mass index affects spirometry indices in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. Front. Physiol. 14:1132078. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1132078

Received: 26 December 2022; Accepted: 20 November 2023;
Published: 01 December 2023.

Edited by:

Giuseppe Guida, University of Turin, Italy

Reviewed by:

Paula Kauppi, Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa, Finland
Maria Michelle Papamichael, La Trobe University, Australia

Copyright © 2023 Wang, Gan, Wang, Yu, An, Sun, Gao and Zhu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Baoqing Sun, c3VuYmFvcWluZ0B2aXAuMTYzLmNvbQ==; Yi Gao, bWlzdGFsbDJAMTYzLmNvbQ==; Zheng Zhu, Y2hpbmcxMjYyMDA2QDEyNi5jb20=

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.