Atsushi Masamune
Shin HamadaEditorial on the Research Topic
Mechanisms of Inflammation and Fibrosis Interplays in the Digestive Diseases
Fibrosis denotes excessive scarring and is seen in a wide variety of benign and malignant diseases in the digestive systems. Fibrosis develops as the consequences of inflammation, which involves a variety of components such as immune cells, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, cancer cells, mediators, extracellular matrix (ECM) components and pathogens (Erkan et al., 2012; Iwata et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2022). The dynamic interaction of these participants determines the nature of fibrosis in quantity and quality, and the fate of fibrosis. Fibrosis is now regarded as a highly dynamic process which might be reversible and serve as promising therapeutic targets. In this Research Topic, articles dealing with the roles of the inflammation and fibrosis in a variety of digestive diseases including inflammatory bowel diseases, liver fibrosis, pancreatitis, and pancreatic cancer have been published.
Pancreatic fibrosis is a characteristic pathological feature of pancreatic ducal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) (Masamune and Shimosegawa, 2013). It has been controversial whether stroma drives pancreatic cancer progression or acts as a defense against pancreatic cancer. Stroma might stimulate aggressive behaviors of pancreatic cancer cells and help them escape from host immune-surveillance. On the other hand, stroma might provide a barrier limiting dissemination and metastasis of pancreatic cancer cells. Another aspect of stroma is low blood perfusion. Dense stroma impairs drug delivery by several mechanisms such as providing physical barrier, high interstitial pressure, and less leaky phenotype of pericytes (Erkan, 2013). Fibrosis also contributes to the formation of immunosuppressive microenvironment by altering cellular interactions and differentiation of stromal cells (Hamada et al., 2022). Based on these findings, the concept of “anti-fibrosis therapy” has been proposed for the treatment of PDAC. By targeting stroma, we might expect inhibition of stroma-stimulated aggressive behaviors of pancreatic cancer cells, more efficient delivery of anti-cancer drugs within the tumor, activation of immune systems targeting cancer cells. However, metastasis and dissemination might be also increased by destroying physical barriers and increased angiogenesis. In addition, non-specific inhibition of stromal cells might abolish their host-defensive roles.
The break-through in this research field is the identification and characterization of pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs) back to 1998 (Apte et al., 1998; Bachem et al., 1998). It has been established that PSCs play a pivotal role in the development of pancreatic fibrosis in PDAC (Erkan, 2013). Previous studies have shown the cancer-promoting effects of PSCs; PSCs facilitate local tumor growth and distant metastasis, play a role in the resistance to conventional therapies, induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition and stem-cell like phenotypes, cause impaired immune responses (Hamada et al., 2022). Based on the studies using cultured PSCs, anti-fibrosis therapies appeared to be a promising approach for the treatment of PDAC. For example, vitamin D analog enhanced the pancreatic cancer therapy. Vitamin D analog (Calcipotriol) increased the decreased the tumor volume, increased the vascularity and intratumoral gemcitabine concentration, leading to improved overall survival of the KPC mice compared with gemcitabine alone (Sherman et al., 2014). However, depletion of stromal by deletion of Shh, IPI-926, or targeting α-smooth muscle actin (SMA)-positive myofibroblasts, unexpectedly, caused the undifferentiated cancer phenotype, increased distant metastasis and cachexia, resulting in decreased overall survival (Rhim et al., 2014). Therefore, there existed discrepancies between the results obtained using cultured PSCs and those obtained by Hedgehog inhibitors or targeting α-SMA in genetically engineered mouse models. It is also noteworthy that the several clinical trials assessing the effectiveness of PSC-targeting therapies failed to show effectiveness (Vaish et al., 2021). The clinical trial evaluating efficacy of IPI-926 with gemcitabine has been halted due to unexpected shortening of survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, who received combination therapy. Another agent Vismodegib, an inhibitor of hedgehog inhibitor, also failed to show clinical benefits. Simutuzumab, an inhibitor of ECM remodeling enzyme, did not improve clinical outcomes. Even though the retrospective study identified longer progression-free survival of patients with pancreatic cancer receiving angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II type-1 receptor blockers (ARBs), the multicenter study that assessed the efficacy of candesartan, an ARB, with gemcitabine failed to show effectiveness for pancreatic cancer (Nakai et al., 2013). Stromal biology might be context-dependent and more complicated than previously recognized.
Following studies further proved this concept. The glycosylphosphatidylinositol GPI-anchored protein, meflin, is a marker of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Deletion of meflin in the KPC mice resulted in the promotion of pancreatic cancer. Meflin-expressing α-SMA positive cells suppressed tumorigenicity and poor differentiation of pancreatic cancer cells in the subcutaneous implantation model, suggesting a certain cancer-inhibiting population in PSCs. Reduced stromal meflin expression correlated with poor prognosis of patients with PDAC (Mizutani et al., 2019). Similarly, another cancer-promoting switch of PSCs also has been identified. The Rho effector protein kinase N2 (PKN2) is essential for the myofibroblast phenotypes such as α-SMA expression, proliferation and contractility. Loss of PKN2 in PSCs promoted pancreatic cancer cell growth and invasion in the in vitro co-culture model and in vivo orthotopic implantation model. PKN2 knockout in PSCs affected matrisome, the component list of extracellular matrix proteins, toward pro-metastatic signature (Murray et al., 2022). In contrast, cancer-promoting subpopulations of PSCs also have been identified. Interestingly, these PSCs are further divided into myofibroblastic and inflammatory subtypes, which produce collagen fibers and inflammatory cytokines, respectively (Zhang et al., 2021). These studies highlighted the heterogeneity of PSCs, cancer-promoting and cancer-inhibiting roles, which should be taken into consideration for therapeutic intervention.
Origin of these cancer-promoting stromal cells has been extensively studied. In addition to the activation of resident fibroblast, PSCs and MSCs, cells from non-fibroblastic lineage such as epithelial cells, endothelial cells, adipocytes, pericytes and smooth muscle cells undergo transdifferentiation to support pancreatic cancer progression (Manoukian et al., 2021). Among these wide variety of cellular origins, PSCs remain numerically minor population of cancer-associated fibroblasts, whereas play nonredundant role such as specific ECM production (Helms et al., 2022). The cancer-promoting and cancer-inhibiting stromal cells’ phenotypes also can be converted with each other, according to microenvironment (Sunami et al., 2020). Numerous markers of these complex subtypes have been identified such as cell-surface molecules, receptors and cytokines.
Based on these lines of evidence, several clinical studies are ongoing. Quiescent PSCs store vitamin A-containing lipid droplet. The vitamin A-metabolite, all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) has been shown to suppress fibrosis formation by PSCs and PDAC progression. Administration of ATRA with gemcitabine to the KPC mice efficiently reduced cancer cell proliferation and invasion, as well as the PSC-derived ECM deposition within tumor (Carapuca et al., 2016). ATRA treatment caused remodeling of pancreatic cancer microenvironment, such as increased vascularity and improvement of hypoxia. The phase I clinical trial using ATRA has been conducted by enrolling unresectable PDAC patients. Administration of gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel along with ATRA was safe and tolerable, and increased true diffusion values by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, suggesting altered stromal structure (Kocher et al., 2020). The number of α-SMA positive cells within surgically resected pancreatic cancer specimens correlated with lower plasma levels of vitamin D (Mukai et al., 2018). Clinical trial targeting vitamin D is also under its way. The phase III trial administrating high-dose oral vitamin D3 prior to surgery is ongoing, evaluating postoperative mortality (Hosein et al., 2020). Further studies are warranted to identify adequate intervention to normalize pancreatic cancer stroma. Specific cancer-promoting functions of cancer stroma also need to be clarified, for novel therapeutic targets.
Author Contributions
AM and SH wrote, revised, and approved the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Apte M. V., Haber P. S., Applegate T. L., Norton I. D., McCaughan G. W., Korsten M. A., et al. (1998). Periacinar Stellate Shaped Cells in Rat Pancreas: Identification, Isolation, and Culture. Gut 43, 128–133. doi:10.1136/gut.43.1.128
Bachem M. G., Schneider E., Gross H., Weidenbach H., Schmid R. M., Menke A., et al. (1998). Identification, Culture, and Characterization of Pancreatic Stellate Cells in Rats and Humans. Gastroenterology 115, 421–432. doi:10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70209-4
Carapuça E. F., Gemenetzidis E., Feig C., Bapiro T. E., Williams M. D., Wilson A. S., et al. (2016). Anti-stromal Treatment Together with Chemotherapy Targets Multiple Signalling Pathways in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. J. Pathol. 239, 286–296. doi:10.1002/path.4727
Erkan M., Adler G., Apte M. V., Bachem M. G., Buchholz M., Detlefsen S., et al. (2012). StellaTUM: Current Consensus and Discussion on Pancreatic Stellate Cell Research. Gut 61, 172–178. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301220
Erkan M. (2013). The Role of Pancreatic Stellate Cells in Pancreatic Cancer. Pancreatology 13, 106–109. doi:10.1016/j.pan.2013.01.008
Hamada S., Matsumoto R., Masamune A. (2022). HIF-1 and NRF2; Key Molecules for Malignant Phenotypes of Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 14, 411. doi:10.3390/cancers14020411
Helms E. J., Berry M. W., Chaw R. C., Dufort C. C., Sun D., Onate M. K., et al. (2022). Mesenchymal Lineage Heterogeneity Underlies Nonredundant Functions of Pancreatic Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts. Cancer Discov. 12, 484–501. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-0601
Hosein A. N., Brekken R. A., Maitra A. (2020). Pancreatic Cancer Stroma: an Update on Therapeutic Targeting Strategies. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 17, 487–505. doi:10.1038/s41575-020-0300-1
Iwata K., Mikami Y., Kato M., Yahagi N., Kanai T. (2021). Pathogenesis and Management of Gastrointestinal Inflammation and Fibrosis: from Inflammatory Bowel Diseases to Endoscopic Surgery. Inflamm. Regener 41, 21. doi:10.1186/s41232-021-00174-7
Kocher H. M., Basu B., Froeling F. E. M., Sarker D., Slater S., Carlin D., et al. (2020). Phase I Clinical Trial Repurposing All-Trans Retinoic Acid as a Stromal Targeting Agent for Pancreatic Cancer. Nat. Commun. 11, 4841. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18636-w
Manoukian P., Bijlsma M., Van Laarhoven H. (2021). The Cellular Origins of Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts and Their Opposing Contributions to Pancreatic Cancer Growth. Front. Cel Dev. Biol. 9, 743907. doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.743907
Masamune A., Shimosegawa T. (2013). Pancreatic Stellate Cells - Multi-Functional Cells in the Pancreas. Pancreatology 13, 102–105. doi:10.1016/j.pan.2012.12.058
Mizutani Y., Kobayashi H., Iida T., Asai N., Masamune A., Hara A., et al. (2019). Meflin-positive Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Inhibit Pancreatic Carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 79, 5367–5381. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-19-0454
Mukai Y., Yamada D., Eguchi H., Iwagami Y., Asaoka T., Noda T., et al. (2018). Vitamin D Supplementation Is a Promising Therapy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma in Conjunction with Current Chemoradiation Therapy. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 25, 1868–1879. doi:10.1245/s10434-018-6431-8
Murray E. R., Menezes S., Henry J. C., Williams J. L., Alba-Castellón L., Baskaran P., et al. (2022). Disruption of Pancreatic Stellate Cell Myofibroblast Phenotype Promotes Pancreatic Tumor Invasion. Cel Rep. 38, 110227. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110227
Nakai Y., Isayama H., Ijichi H., Sasaki T., Takahara N., Ito Y., et al. (2013). A Multicenter Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine and Candesartan Combination Therapy in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: GECA2. Invest. New Drugs 31, 1294–1299. doi:10.1007/s10637-013-9972-5
Rhim A. D., Oberstein P. E., Thomas D. H., Mirek E. T., Palermo C. F., Sastra S. A., et al. (2014). Stromal Elements Act to Restrain, rather Than Support, Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell 25, 735–747. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2014.04.021
Sherman M. H., Yu R. T., Engle D. D., Ding N., Atkins A. R., Tiriac H., et al. (2014). Vitamin D Receptor-Mediated Stromal Reprogramming Suppresses Pancreatitis and Enhances Pancreatic Cancer Therapy. Cell 159, 80–93. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.007
Sunami Y., Häußler J., Kleeff J. (2020). Cellular Heterogeneity of Pancreatic Stellate Cells, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, and Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts in Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 12, 3770. doi:10.3390/cancers12123770
Vaish U., Jain T., Are A. C., Dudeja V. (2021). Cancer-associated Fibroblasts in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: An Update on Heterogeneity and Therapeutic Targeting. Ijms 22, 13408. doi:10.3390/ijms222413408
Wang F.-D., Zhou J., Chen E.-Q. (2022). Molecular Mechanisms and Potential New Therapeutic Drugs for Liver Fibrosis. Front. Pharmacol. 13, 787748. doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.787748
Keywords: all-trans retinoic acid, anti-stromal therapy, meflin, pancreatic cancer, pancreatic fibrosis, pancreatic stellate cells, vitamin D
Citation: Masamune A and Hamada S (2022) Editorial: Mechanisms of Inflammation and Fibrosis Interplays in the Digestive Diseases. Front. Physiol. 13:906742. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.906742
Received: 29 March 2022; Accepted: 30 March 2022;
Published: 14 April 2022.
Edited by:
Stephen J. Pandol, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, United StatesReviewed by:
Horacio Cabral, The University of Tokyo, JapanCopyright © 2022 Masamune and Hamada. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Atsushi Masamune, YW1hc2FtdW5lQG1lZC50b2hva3UuYWMuanA=