Skip to main content

METHODS article

Front. Physiol., 08 June 2022
Sec. Avian Physiology
This article is part of the Research Topic Functional Mechanisms at the Avian Gut Microbiome-Intestinal Immunity Interface and its Regulation of Avian Physiological Responses View all 10 articles

A Poultry Subclinical Necrotic Enteritis Disease Model Based on Natural Clostridium perfringens Uptake

  • 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
  • 2Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

Necrotic enteritis (NE) in poultry is an opportunistic infection caused by Clostridium perfringens. Well-known as a multifactorial disease, NE development is under the influence of a wide range of environmental risk factors that promote the proliferation of pathogenic C. perfringens at the expense of nonpathogenic strains. Current in vivo NE challenge models typically incorporate pre-exposure to disease risk factors, in combination with exogenous C. perfringens inoculation. Our goal was to enhance current models using a natural uptake of C. perfringens from the barn environment to produce a subclinical infection. We incorporated access to litter, coccidial exposure (either 10× or 15× of the manufacturer-recommended Coccivac B52 Eimeria vaccine challenge; provided unspecified doses of E. acervulina, E. mivati, E. tenella, and two strains of E. maxima), feed composition, and feed withdrawal stress, and achieved the commonly observed NE infection peak at 3 weeks post-hatch. NE severity was evaluated based on gut lesion pathology, clinical signs, and mortality rate. Under cage-reared conditions, 15× coccidial vaccine-challenged birds showed overall NE lesion prevalence that was 8-fold higher than 10× coccidial vaccine-challenged birds. NE-associated mortality was observed only in a floor-reared flock after a 15× coccidial vaccine challenge.

1 Introduction

Necrotic enteritis (NE) is an economically important infectious disease for the global poultry sector, causing an annual loss of US $6 billion worldwide (Wade and Keyburn, 2015). This is largely attributable to the costs of prophylactic and therapeutic medications and compromised growth performance. The causative bacterium, Clostridium perfringens, is ubiquitously distributed and comprises part of the gut microbiota of healthy chickens, with a high diversity of strains representing the total C. perfringens population (Engström et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2018; Kiu et al., 2019). The NE-causing strains are characterized by a capacity to produce necrotic enteritis toxin B (NetB) and possession of genes that function to enhance their proliferation, maintenance, and virulence, including antibiotic resistance genes, adhesins, catabolic enzymes, toxins, and bacteriocins (Bannam et al., 2011; Parreira et al., 2012; Freedman et al., 2015; Keyburn et al., 2008).

One key step in NE pathogenesis is the dominance of pathogenic C. perfringens in the gut flora over nonpathogenic strains, followed by profound expression of virulence factors. A number of risk factors promote pathogenic C. perfringens development, and hence NE infection. Exposure to coccidial parasites remains one of the best-studied factors due to the strong link between coccidiosis and NE disease (Stanley et al., 2014). Coccidiosis-induced epithelial extracellular matrix disruption, plasma protein leakage, and mucus production provide extra selective advantages for pathogenic C. perfringens which possess a stronger binding ability and mucolytic activity than nonpathogenic strains (Collier et al., 2008; Martin and Smyth, 2010). Diet components also constitute relevant key risk factors associated with NE development. Feeds rich in water-soluble non-starch polysaccharides, such as wheat-based diets, increase digesta viscosity, prolong transit time, and promote pathogen retention (Annett et al., 2002; Shojadoost et al., 2012). Increased NE occurrence is also associated with poor husbandry management, such as food deprivation, inadequate hygiene routines, and overcrowding (Hofacre et al., 2019).

Given the multifactorial nature of NE, the production of experimental infections similar to field conditions is known to be challenging. Typically, induced NE outbreaks should occur around week three post-hatch, reflecting the timing when animals in the field are most at risk (Williams, 2005; Moore, 2016). Additionally, the model should yield a high incidence of necrotic lesions without severe mortality in the flock (Dierick et al., 2021). This is relevant to the field situation where subclinical infections are more common and account for larger economic loss compared to the clinical form of NE (Wade & Keyburn, 2015). Efforts over the past decade suggest that concentrated live coccidial vaccines in combination with multiple dosages of C. perfringens culture result in NE infections that fulfill these criteria (Gholamiandehkordi et al., 2007; Dierick et al., 2021). Recent NE studies often adopt this dual-infection approach concurrently with the application of dietary and management risk factors (Dierick et al., 2019; Lee et al., 2013; M'Sadeq et al., 2015; Onrust et al., 2018; Wilson et al., 2018).

Induction of experimental NE using natural exposure to C. perfringens further mirrors conditions under which NE arises in commercial operations. This approach has gained prominence over the past decade (Abildgaard et al., 2010; Calik et al., 2019; Emami et al., 2019 and 2021; Fernando et al., 2011; Lovland et al., 2003; Palliyeguru et al., 2010). Compared to conventional models that drive infection via experimental application of C. perfringens, natural NE infection can A) simplify the disease challenge protocol, B) eliminate the variation between models caused by different bacterial culture conditions, challenge route, dosage, timing, and frequency, and C) develop subclinical infection most similar to the field condition. Importantly, C. perfringens undergoes a series of adaptations in response to fluctuation of the gut environment, which modify the disease-causing ability of this bacterium (Figure 1). Given the highly plastic phenotype that C. perfringens can display natural infection also overcomes deviations commonly associated with in vitro manipulation, including changes to colonization efficacy and toxin production (Parreira et al., 2016). Thus, the natural infection approach can better recapitulate the microbial loads and other relevant physiological factors that contribute to NE pathogenesis.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. A wide range of environmental factors determines the manifestation of necrotic enteritis (NE) caused by Clostridium perfringens. Chickens are at higher risk to develop NE infection with impaired immune status (A), which can result from declining maternal antibodies and/or pre-exposure to immunosuppressive factors (Lee et al., 2011). The intestine environment also plays a role in virulence modulation of C. perfringens, the first example can be seen in the upregulated toxin expression when in close contact with epithelial cells (B) (Vidal et al., 2009). A complex microbiota environment, compared to a culture medium, can differentially regulate the virulence phenotype of the bacterium via inter and intra strain interactions through bacteriocin production (C) (Ohtani and Shimizu, 2015). Virulent strains are capable of producing bacteriocins that strongly inhibit non-virulent strains, as a mechanism in pathogen-commensal competition (Barbara et al., 2008; Timbermont et al., 2009). Meanwhile, non-virulent strains can inherit the virulence genes horizontally (D), leading to the emergence of new strains that are capable of causing NE (Lacey et al., 2017). Preexisting mucosal damage that exposes epithelial extracellular matrix (E), increased plasma protein leakage and mucus production (F) can provide an extra advantage for pathogenic C perfringens, which possess a stronger binding ability and mucolytic activity (Collier et al., 2008; Martin and Smyth, 2010). Diet components comprising part of the gut environment are also key risk factors associated with NE development (G). For example, feeds rich in water-soluble non-starch polysaccharides, such as a wheat-based diet, can increase digesta viscosity, prolong transit time, and promote pathogen retention (Annett et al., 2002; Shojadoost et al., 2012).

Our objective was to validate a natural, subclinical NE challenge model. Aiming to optimize the current natural NE model, we incorporated a novel stressor, a 24-h feed withdrawal at day 18 post-hatch, apart from other commonly used risk factors for inducing experimental NE. This nutrient alteration in the gut lumen aims to disrupt the intestinal microbial community and promote the development of pathogenic C. perfringens. To examine whether this infection protocol induces subclinical NE in different rearing conditions, we challenged three experimental flocks with different housing types, diet regimens, and two levels of coccidial challenge intensity. Our results suggested timely application of stress factors (Figure 2) resulted in a consistent NE infection similar to the field situation, characterized by a high incidence of gut lesions in the flock with a low mortality rate.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. Induction of subclinical NE in broiler chicken by application of disease predisposing factors. (A) To promote natural development of the already-existing virulent C perfringens in the gut, this disease model incorporated multiple predisposing factors: housing condition, diet components, coccidiosis-induced mucosal damage, and stressor leading to alteration of gut environment. (B) Timeline of animal handling and sampling schedule.

2 Material and Methods

2.1 Animals and Natural Necrotic Enteritis Challenge

One-day-old Ross 708 broiler chicks were obtained from a local hatchery (Sofina Foods) and housed in the Poultry Research Center at the University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. The natural NE infection model was developed stepwise using a total of 752 animals from three experimental flocks. Animals in flocks 1 and 3 were randomly assigned to two dietary treatments to evaluate the impact of antibiotic removal on NE development (flock 1: antibiotic treatment with 21 cages of 8 birds, and drug-free treatment with 22 cages of 8 birds; flock 3: antibiotic treatment with 8 pens of 18 birds, drug-free treatment with 8 pens of 18 birds). Animals in flock 2 were used for evaluating the immunomodulation effect of β-glucan and were randomly assigned to three injection treatments (each with 5 cages of 8 birds). Flocks 1 and 2 were reared in Specht pullet cages (21 × 23.5 × 17.5 inches, Specht Canada Inc.), and flock 3 was housed in the floor pens (0.9 m × 1.4 m). All three flocks were treated with a natural NE challenge procedure but with different levels of coccidiosis challenge intensity (Table 3).

Birds from all three flocks were fed a wheat-based diet formulated to meet or exceed the management guide recommendations for all nutrients. The experimental diets were administered as a starter diet, grower diet, and finisher diet (Table 1). The diet composition for flock 3 was adjusted as part of an adaptation of the model to include a more practical commercial-type diet. Feed and water were provided ad libitum. Temperature and lighting were monitored daily and adjusted according to the Ross 708 guidelines (Aviagen, 2019). On day 13, a 10× (flock 1) or 15× (flocks 2 and 3) dose of the Coccivac-B52 vaccine (Merck Animal Health) containing live, sporulated Eimeria oocysts (E. acervulina, E. mivati, E. tenella, and two strains of E. maxima at unspecified doses) was administered through oral gavage. Each bird received 1 ml of vaccine diluted in distilled water. On day 18, the feed was withdrawn for 24 h with animals being closely monitored for health over the subsequent 3 days. Figure 2B shows the predisposing factors application timeline in the natural NE challenge model.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 1. Ingredient and calculated nutrient composition of experimental diets for birds during starter, grower, and finisher stages.

2.2 Sampling and Lesion Scoring

For experimental flocks 1 and 2, animals were randomly selected and examined for NE disease status on days 17, 21, and 40 (flock 1: n = 16, flock 2: n = 18). Flock 3 was sampled on day 21 and day 40 (n = 128). The NE-specific lesions in the small intestine were scored as described by Shojadoost et al. (2012) with some modifications. Animals were scored from 0 to 3 based on the following criteria:

0: No gross lesion;

1: Thin or friable walls, or diffuse superficial fibrin;

2: Focal necrosis or ulceration, or non-removable fibrin deposit;

3: Multifocal necrosis or ulceration, or nonremovable fibrin deposit.

Lesions more severe than score 3 were not observed.

2.3 Bacterial Quantification

2.3.1 DNA Extraction and Purification

Cecal contents collected from birds in flocks 1 and 2 were kept at −20°C for C. perfringens quantification. 0.2 g of thawed cecal content was measured into a 2 ml tube with 0.3 g 0.1 mm diameter silica beads (Biospec). The cecal contents were washed with and resuspended in 1 ml of TN150 buffer (149 mM NaCl, 5.58 mM Tris-HCl, 4.38 mM Trometamol, and pH 8.0) followed by a 3 min bead-beating at 5,000 rpm (Mini BeadBeater, Fisher Scientific). After centrifugation at 14,600 g for 5 min, the supernatant was transferred to a new 2 ml microtube. The DNA was purified using the phenol and chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (24:1) method and precipitated with 100% ethanol at −20°C overnight. The DNA pellet was washed twice with 500 μL of 70% ethanol without disrupting the pellet and dissolved in 100 μL of Nuclease-free water. The concentration and quality of DNA were measured using an ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies) at 260 and 280 nm.

2.3.2 Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)

The total C. perfringens population was quantified by qRT-PCR targeting the 16s rRNA gene (Table 2). Commercial C. perfringens genomic DNA was serially diluted 7-fold (using 1.35 × 107 as a starting point) and included on each plate to generate a standard curve for the absolute quantification of the bacteria population.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 2. Clostridium perfringens qPCR targeted genes and primer sequences used in this study.

The qRT-PCR experiment was performed in QuantStudio™ 6 Flex System (Applied Biosystems) and data were analyzed with a QuantStudio rt-PCR Software v.1.3 (Applied Biosystems). Reactions of each sample were triplicated on a 96-well plate containing a 20 μL reaction mixture in each well (1 μL 50 ng/μL DNA template, 1 μL 25 pmol/μL of forward and reverse primers, 10 μL Fast SYBR Green Master Mix, and 7 μL Nuclease-free water). The amplification process started with initial denaturation at 95°C for 20 s followed by 40 cycles of annealing including 95°C for 3 s and 62°C for 30 s. As an indicator of amplification specificity, the melting curve of PCR products was generated by fluorescence collection during slow heating from 60 to 95°C with a rate of 0.05°C/s. The copy number of the target gene was calculated by the following formula as described by Li et al. (2009) and expressed as copies/g digesta. DNA (number of molecules)=[6.02×1023(moleculesmol)×DNA amount (g)][DNA length(bp)×660(gmolbp)]

To detect the presence of the netB gene in cecal digesta, the genomic DNA of a netB-positive strain (CA147, Arden Biotechnology Ltd., United Kingdom) was 7-fold serial diluted, as aforementioned, and included on each plate to generate a standard curve for the absolute quantification of the strains. Reactions of each sample containing a 20 μL reaction mixture were prepared as aforementioned. The amplification process started at 95°C for 20 s, followed by 40 cycles of annealing and elongation including 95°C for 3 s and 60°C for 30 s. The specific netB amplicon was differentiated from nonspecific products by the DNA melting curve. The copy number of the target genes (C. perfringens and netB-positive strains) were calculated according to Li et al. (2009) and expressed as copies/g digesta.

2.4 Intestine Histology

Following lesion scoring, a 3 cm intestinal section at the lesion site was collected and fixed in 10% formaldehyde for microscopic histology analysis. Fixed intestine tissue was dehydrated and embedded in paraffin wax, then sliced into 5 μm sections and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The intestinal cross sections were examined under light microscopy. Images were collected by using a SeBaCam digital microscope camera with SeBaView software (Thermo Scientific).

2.5 Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed by the GraphPad Prism 8 software. The experimental unit was the individual bird. To understand the impact of the coccidial challenge on natural NE development, Fisher’s exact test was conducted to compare the lesion score between low- and high-coccidial challenged animals. A nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the rank of lesion score between two coccidial challenge levels of the same age. T-tests were conducted to compare bacteria abundance between the age of days 17 and 21. p < 0.05 was defined as being statistically significant.

3 Results

3.1 Mortality and Clinical Signs

The two cage-reared flocks yielded similar mortality during the experiment period. The overall mortality (day 1–40) was 1.15% in flock 1 and 1.39% in flock 2 (Table 3). All mortalities occurred within the first week, prior to the coccidial vaccine dosing and feed withdrawal challenge. Birds did not show observable clinical signs, but bloody and mucous-containing feces were found after feed withdrawal, indicating the presence of diarrhea.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 3. Mortality and intestinal lesion prevalence in three experimental flocks with different flock sizes, housing types, and coccidiosis challenge intensities. Coccidial pre-exposure was incorporated in the NE disease model through oral gavage of live Eimeria oocysts using the Coccivac-B52 vaccine (Merck Animal Health).

The floor-reared flock (flock 3) showed higher overall mortality at 3.82% compared to the cage-reared flocks (Table 3). Two mortality peaks were observed during the experiment period. The first peak occurred during week 1 and the second peak was found between weeks 3–5 after the 24-h feed withdrawal was applied. The second mortality peak was directly triggered by feed withdrawal on day 18, which also caused depression and decreased mobility in birds.

3.2 Detection and Quantification of C. perfringens

Cecal total C. perfringens was quantified by qRT-PCR targeting the 16 s gene. In flock 1, all sampled birds were found to be C. perfringens positive regardless of age (Figure 3A). The presence of netB, the hallmark of NE-causing strains, was detected in 75.0% of the samples on day 17, before the feed withdrawal challenge, and increased to 93.8% on day 21. Correspondingly, netB abundance on day 21 was significantly higher than day 17 (p = 0.0242) (Figure 3B). This is consistent with our expectation that the 24-h feed withdrawal on day 18 further contributed to the propagation of the virulent strains within the flock. The observed C. perfringens density was relatively high with 16s abundance ranging from 10⁷ to 10⁹ copies per gram of cecal content (Figure 3B). A relatively lower netB abundance was observed at around 10⁶ copies per gram of digesta. Quantification of 16 s and netB copies showed no significant difference between day 17 and day 21 (p > 0.05), though day 21 tended to have a higher abundance of the examined genes. Flock 2 was reared in similar conditions as flock 1 but was challenged with a higher dosage of Eimeria oocysts on day 13. However, the higher coccidial challenge level did not increase bacteria detection rate or bacteria abundance (data not shown).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 3. Quantification of C perfringens and intestine lesion confirmed induction of subclinical necrotic enteritis using the natural infection model (A) Detection of C perfringens 16s and netB gene in cecal contents by qRT-PCR. The percentages of animals detected with 16s or netB are plotted within bars. Data were collected from flock 1 (n = 16) (B) Abundance of 16s and netB gene expressed as copy number/g of cecal content. Data were collected from flock 1. T-tests were conducted to compare gene abundance between the age of days 17 and 21. The netB abundance on day 21 was significantly higher than on day 17 (p = 0.0242) (C) Intestine gross lesion prevalence in flock 1 (challenged with 10× concentrated coccidial vaccine) and flock 2 (challenged with 15× concentrate/d coccidial vaccine). The percentages of animals detected with gross lesions are plotted within bars. Fisher’s exact test was conducted to compare the difference between low and high coccidial challenged animals (D17: p < 0.0001, D21: p = 0.0045; D40: p < 0.0001) (D) Lesion scoring results from flock 1 and flock 2. A nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the rank of lesion score between two coccidial challenge levels from the same age (D17: p < 0.0001, D21: p = 0.0045, D40: p < 0.0001) (E) Severity of NE-specific lesions was scored from 0 to 3 based on the intestine gross examination. The tissue at the lesion site was processed for the histology analysis. The original magnification of the images is ×25. The necrotic tissue was typically covered by a layer of mixed cellular debris (arrow). Sloughed mucosa leading to complete loss of villi (arrowhead) was observed in intestinal tissue with a score of 3.

3.3 Gross Examination of Intestine Lesion

In our study, mild lesions (scores 1 and 2) were predominantly observed with a few birds scored with 3 (Figure 3E). Severe lesions (score greater than 3) was not observed in any of the flocks. A total of 48 birds were sampled in experiment flock 1. Only 5 birds (10.42%) had NE-specific lesions under the 10× coccidiosis vaccine challenge (Table 3), and all the lesion-positive animals were observed on day 21. With increased intensity of coccidial challenge at (15× vaccine dose), flock 2 (n = 54) and flock 3 (n = 256) showed a higher prevalence of birds with necrotic lesions (85.19 and 80.08%, respectively). Lesion prevalence in flocks reared in the wire-floored cage environment (flock 1 and 2) showed that coccidial challenge levels have a profound impact on NE lesion development (Figure 3C). The 15× dosage of Eimeria vaccine gavage led to prevalent lesion development in the flock as early as day 17 and the lesions were also present on day 40. The high-coccidial challenge flock showed increased lesion score compared to the low-challenge flock on day 17 (p < 0.0001), day 21 (p = 0.0045), and day 40 (p < 0.0001) (Figure 3D). The floor-rear flock (flock 3) with 15× coccidial challenge yielded consistently higher lesion prevalence on both sampling days as expected. The observed lesion prevalence was 75% (96/128) on day 21 and 93.75% (120/128) on day 40. Animals in flock 3 were not sampled on day 17.

3.4 Microscopic Examination of Intestine Lesion

Representative histopathological images of the intestinal section are shown in Figure 3E. Intestine tissue scored at 0 with no gross lesion and generally showed intact villus structure. However, examination under higher magnification revealed pathological changes including the presence of Eimeria oocysts, mildly dilated capillaries, and capillary hemorrhage. Tissue lesions that scored 1 and 2 generally showed similar microscopic appearance though distinguished changes were observed in gross examination. Under microscopic examination, the necrotic region showed hyperemia, villus fusion, and separation of epithelium from the lamina propria. The necrotic tissue was usually covered by adherent fibrin and cellular debris. These pathological alterations were also observed in lesioned tissue with a score of 3. Noticeably, sloughed mucosa leading to complete loss of villi was observed in certain areas within the lesioned tissue (Figure 3E).

4 Discussion

4.1 Confirmation of Necrotic Enteritis Development

Bacteria quantification together with the characteristic pathology of NE, such as clinical signs and gut lesions, is indicative of successful induction of NE disease (Williams et al., 2003; McReynolds et al., 2004; Palliyeguru et al., 2010). C. perfringens can be found in high populations in NE-affected animals ranging from 10⁶ ∼ 10⁹ CFU (Williams, 2005; McDevitt et al., 2006; Abildgaard et al., 2010). The C. perfringens population observed in our trial is consistent with those typically found in NE-affected animals. Interestingly, the netB gene was more prevalent on day 21 compared to day 17 (Figure 3A). This may be associated with the observed diarrhea on days 18–19 following the feed withdrawal challenge, which could indicate that the experimental conditions promoted the spreading of the netB-carrying strains in the flock.

As noted in previous studies, there may be a poor correlation between the number of C. perfringens organisms in the digesta and the incidence or severity of necrotic enteritis, especially in the subclinical form of the disease (Fernando et al., 2011). Subclinical NE is usually mild with no clinical signs or sudden increase in mortality (Fernando et al., 2011). Thus, gut lesions are considered to be a sensitive disease indicator compared to clinical signs and mortality (Williams et al., 2003). In this study, gut lesions were found in all three experimental flocks and were confirmed with microscopic examination (Figure 3E). Together, the observed bacterial load, clinical signs, and pathological changes suggest NE occurrence in the flocks with disease severity peaked during weeks 3 to 4.

4.2 Prevalence of Gut Lesion

Many conventional NE disease models have shown lesion incidence peaks at a certain age and declines as the animal approaches slaughter (Lovland et al., 2003; Gholamiandehkordi et al., 2007). Natural NE infection induced by reused litter material from a previous flock (Palliyeguru et al., 2010), high stocking density, and housing of birds on litter (Lovland et al., 2003; Fernando et al., 2011) have resulted in lesion prevalence ranging from 6.9 to 68.6%. However, to our knowledge, most studies conducted only one lesion examination during the rearing period. In the field conditions, subclinical NE-affected animals can be detected at slaughter with C. perfringens-associated lesions in the liver and gut (Lovland and Kaldhusdal, 1999; Johansson et al., 2010). This suggests experimental NE models with persisting lesion occurrence may better reflect NE cases in the field, where birds suffering from the subclinical disease are kept without being treated. In this study, we thus involved multiple gut examinations throughout the rearing period. Results suggested coccidial challenge has a profound influence on the development of gut NE lesions. Coccidial challenge intensity affects the occurrence and duration of gross lesions present in the NE-affected flocks. As noted by Stanley et al. (2014), Eimeria spp. caused significant changes in gut microbiota diversity and enabled C. perfringens to persist post challenge. C. perfringens inoculated in the absence of this predisposing factor fail to establish and maintain themselves in the gut flora.

4.3 Mortality

Epidemiology studies suggest that NE occurrence is associated with specific housing conditions, including access to litter and floor-type housing (Kaldhusdal et al., 2016; Goossens et al., 2020). Our data shows NE-related mortality was not observed in our cage-reared flocks even with a 15× coccidial challenge dosage. A sudden but minor increase in mortality in the floor-reared flock was observed starting from day 18. In the E. maxima/C. perfringens dual infection model, NE lesions can be produced without mortality in animals reared in wire cages (Williams et al., 2003), while similar models in floor-reared broilers yielded NE-induced mortality ranging from 8 to 12% (Wu et al., 2010; Hofacre et al., 2019).

Natural NE infection induced by reused litter material from a previous flock resulted in mortality from days 15 to 30, ranging from 1.5 to 4.9% across dietary treatments (Palliyeguru et al., 2010). Fernando et al. (2011), by housing birds on wood-shaving litter and removing antibiotics, induced NE infection with mortality of 1.19–1.66% from days 20 to 36. These findings and our observation are consistent with the mortality range reported in subclinical NE affected flocks (Lovland and Kaldhusdal, 2001). Recent work by Calik et al. (2019) and Emami et al. (2019) described a new natural NE disease model by spraying the same coccidiosis vaccine, as used in our study, on litter and feed upon bird placement. An NE outbreak was observed on days 7–9 with overall mortality at around 12%. These findings showed higher mortality which peaked at an earlier age compared to our study but is consistent with our observation that the NE outbreak occurred 1–2 weeks after the coccidial challenge by concentrated Coccivac®-B52 vaccine.

4.4 Practical Aspects of the Natural Infection Model

Conventional clinical NE models usually involve repeated oral inoculations of coccidial oocysts and C. perfringens for consecutive days (Williams et al., 2003; McReynolds et al., 2004; Gholamiandehkordi et al., 2007; Park et al., 2008; Wu et al., 2010; Jayaraman et al., 2013). One of the advantages of the natural NE model is the simplicity of the challenge schedule. Coccidial inoculation typically takes 30 min for two experienced technicians to gavage 100 birds, while feed withdrawal can be done within an hour even in large flocks. Experience from our research facility showed consistent induction of NE across studies using this protocol. Reduced complexity in the challenge schedule can limit animal stress and treatment inconsistency between different personnel, thus contributing to persistent induction of NE disease.

This natural infection model also allows flexibility in designing dietary formulas. The wheat-based broiler chicken diets commonly include xylanase to break down arabinoxylans, decrease viscosity, and increase digestibility in the birds (Lee et al., 2017). Elimination of xylanase has been used to produce natural NE infection (Abildgaard et al., 2010), by increasing feed transit time promoting C. perfringens persistence (Choct et al., 2006). Another commonly used dietary predisposing factor, fishmeal, supplies abundant glycine and methionine that enhance C. perfringens proliferation and toxin production (Wilkie et al., 2005; Dahiya et al., 2007; Shojadoost et al., 2012). However, the usage of fishmeal is limited in broiler feed due to its high cost and low availability (Frempong et al., 2019). We showed that birds fed with a fishmeal-free diet with xylanase inclusion (flock 3) showed prevalent NE lesions in the gut, suggesting fishmeal inclusion and xylanase elimination are not required for experimental NE induction.

The presence of pathogenic C. perfringens is required but insufficient to trigger NE infection. The virulence phenotype of C. perfringens is subject to the influence of host epithelium and complex lumen environment (Figure 1). This highlights the cooperative roles of a wide range of environmental factors that contribute to NE development. For research aimed at prophylaxis of NE, it is critical to conduct the evaluation under a condition accurately mimicking the disease development under practical production conditions. The infection model presented in this study was able to reproduce the commonly observed subclinical NE, regarding the severity of symptoms, timing of lesion development, and rate of mortality. By allowing the pathogen to develop in vivo, NE researchers will be able to evaluate a prophylactic strategy at an early stage of disease development, when the damage to the animal is most reversible and thus ideal to be targeted. However, more studies are needed to better understand this novel infection approach, such as alterations to mucus characterization, epithelial properties, and immunological function during natural NE induction.

Feed withdrawal introduced on day 18 in this natural NE challenge is important to trigger the timely development of the disease outbreak. At the same time, this approach is believed to cause limited stress to the animals and is considered humane when used properly. Pathogenic C. perfringens has a stronger ability in binding extracellular matrices and utilize nutrients released from host intestinal tissue, thus showing a selective survival advantage over nonpathogenic strains during feed withdrawal (Timbermont et al., 2009, 2014; Wade et al., 2015). Feed restriction is often used in conventional NE challenges, not as a designated stressor but as a measure to ensure uniformity of inoculation treatments (Shojadoost et al., 2012). In those situations, the C. perfringens inoculation is administered mixed with feed, and feed is usually withdrawn overnight so that the birds will eagerly eat the inoculated feed.

The NE-causing C. perfringens are of high diversity in terms of genomic content, with the varied ability to cause intestinal damage. The growing understanding of the differences between strains isolated from animals of different health statuses and geographical regions highlights the need to carefully select appropriate strains to use in experimental NE models. It was reported that 2 C. perfringens strains, both isolated from NE-affected chickens and carrying NetB, showed varied virulence and produced different levels of disease severity in experimentally-induced NE (Gharib-Naseri et al., 2019). Knowledge gained using this challenge model can likely be applied across wide geographic regions. The natural, subclinical infection NE challenge model would allow the propagation of pathogenic strains that are locally prevalent. This would be beneficial to the specific region in the understanding of pathogenesis and control strategies against the locally prevalent pathogenic strains.

5 Conclusion

The NE infection model presented in this study is based on the natural uptake of C. perfringens presented in the housing environment by the chicken. We incorporated multiple NE-associated risk factors to promote the natural development of pathogens, and successfully reproduce subclinical NE. This will contribute to future research aiming at understanding and preventing this disease, by mimicking the natural development of NE in commercial poultry production.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the University of Alberta Animal Care and Use Committee.

Author Contributions

WH, DK, and DB jointly conceived and designed the study. WH, EG, and DK performed the experiments. WH analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This research was funded by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery Grant RGPIN-2018-05768 and an Alberta Ministry of Agriculture & Forestry Research Grant 2018F128R to DRB.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

The genomic DNA of a netB-positive C. perfringens strain was kindly provided by Arden Biotechnology, Ltd, UK.

References

Abildgaard L., Hojberg O., Schramm A., Balle K. M., Engberg R. M. (2010). The Effect of Feeding a Commercial Essential Oil Product on Clostridium perfringens Numbers in the Intestine of Broiler Chickens Measured by Real-Time PCR Targeting the α-toxin-encoding Gene (Plc). Animal Feed Sci. Technol. 157 (3-4), 181–189. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.03.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Annett C. B., Viste J. R., Chirino-Trejo M., Classen H. L., Middleton D. M., Simko E. (2002). Necrotic Enteritis: Effect of Barley, Wheat and Corn Diets on Proliferation of Clostridium perfringens Type A. Avian Pathol. 31 (6), 598–601. doi:10.1080/0307945021000024544

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aviagen (2019). Ross Broiler Nutrition Specifications. , AL. USA: Aviagen, Inc. Huntsville.

Google Scholar

Bannam T. L., Yan X. X., Harrison P. F., Seemann T., Keyburn A. L., Stubenrauch C., et al. (2011). Necrotic Enteritis-Derived Clostridium perfringens Strain with Three Closely Related Independently Conjugative Toxin and Antibiotic Resistance Plasmids. MBio 2 (5), e00190–11. doi:10.1128/mBio.00190-11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barbara A. J., Trinh H. T., Glock R. D., Glenn Songer J. (2008). Necrotic Enteritis-Producing Strains of Clostridium perfringens Displace Non-necrotic Enteritis Strains from the Gut of Chicks. Veterinary Microbiol. 126 (4), 377–382. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.07.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Calik A., Omara , White M. B., Evans N. P., Karnezos T. P., Dalloul R. A. (2019). Dietary Non-drug Feed Additive as an Alternative for Antibiotic Growth Promoters for Broilers during a Necrotic Enteritis Challenge. Microorganisms 7 (8), 257. doi:10.3390/microorganisms7080257

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Choct M., Sinlae M., Al-Jassim R. A. M., Pettersson D. (2006). Effects of Xylanase Supplementation on Between-Bird Variation in Energy Metabolism and the Number of Clostridium perfringens in Broilers Fed a Wheat-Based Diet. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 57 (9), 1017–1021. doi:10.1071/ar05340

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Collier C. T., Hofacre C. L., Payne A. M., Anderson D. B., Kaiser P., Mackie R. I., et al. (2008). Coccidia-induced Mucogenesis Promotes the Onset of Necrotic Enteritis by Supporting Clostridium perfringens Growth. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 122 (1-2), 104–115. doi:10.1016/j.vetimm.2007.10.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dahiya J. P., Hoehler D., Van Kessel A. G., Drew M. D. (2007). Dietary Encapsulated glycine Influences Clostridium perfringens and Lactobacilli Growth in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Broiler Chickens. J. Nutr. 137 (6), 1408–1414. doi:10.1093/jn/137.6.1408

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dierick E., Ducatelle R., Van Immerseel F., Goossens E. (2021). Research Note: The Administration Schedule of Coccidia Is a Major Determinant in Broiler Necrotic Enteritis Models. Poult. Sci. 100 (3), 100806. doi:10.1016/j.psj.2020.10.060

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dierick E., Hirvonen O. P., Haesebrouck F., Ducatelle R., Van Immerseel F., Goossens E. (2019). Rapid Growth Predisposes Broilers to Necrotic Enteritis. Avian Pathol. 48 (5), 416–422. doi:10.1080/03079457.2019.1614147

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Emami N. K., Calik A., White M. B., Young M., Dalloul R. A. (2019). Necrotic Enteritis in Broiler Chickens: the Role of Tight Junctions and Mucosal Immune Responses in Alleviating the Effect of the Disease. Microorganisms 7 (8), 231. doi:10.3390/microorganisms7080231

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Emami N. K., White M. B., Calik A., Kimminau E. A., Dalloul R. A. (2021). Managing Broilers Gut Health with Antibiotic-free Diets during Subclinical Necrotic Enteritis. Poult. Sci. 100 (5), 101055. doi:10.1016/j.psj.2021.101055

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Engström B. E., Johansson A., Aspan A., Kaldhusdal M. (2012). Genetic Relatedness and netB Prevalence Among Environmental Clostridium perfringens Strains Associated with a Broiler Flock Affected by Mild Necrotic Enteritis. Vet. Microbiol. 159 (1-2), 260–264. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.03.024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fernando P. S., Rose S. P., Mackenzie A. M., Silva S. S. P. (2011). Effect of Diets Containing Potato Protein or Soya Bean Meal on the Incidence of Spontaneously-Occurring Subclinical Necrotic Enteritis and the Physiological Response in Broiler Chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 52 (1), 106–114. doi:10.1080/00071668.2010.549105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Freedman J. C., Theoret J. R., Wisniewski J. A., Uzal F. A., Rood J. I., McClane B. A. (2015). Clostridium perfringens Type A-E Toxin Plasmids. Res. Microbiol. 166 (4), 264–279. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2014.09.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Frempong N. S., Nortey T. N. N., Paulk C., Stark C. R. (2019). Evaluating the Effect of Replacing Fish Meal in Broiler Diets with Either Soybean Meal or Poultry By-Product Meal on Broiler Performance and Total Feed Cost Per Kilogram of Gain. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 28 (4), 912–918. doi:10.3382/japr/pfz049

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gharib-Naseri K., Kheravii S. K., Keerqin C., Morgan N., Swick R. A., Choct M., et al. (2019). Two Different Clostridium perfringens Strains Produce Different Levels of Necrotic Enteritis in Broiler Chickens. Poult. Sci. 98 (12), 6422–6432. doi:10.3382/ps/pez480

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gholamiandehkordi A. R., Timbermont L., Lanckriet A., Broeck W. V. D., Pedersen K., Dewulf J., et al. (2007). Quantification of Gut Lesions in a Subclinical Necrotic Enteritis Model. Avian Pathol. 36 (5), 375–382. doi:10.1080/03079450701589118

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goossens E., Van Erum J., De Gussem M., Van Limbergen T., Callens C., De Zutter L., et al. (2020). Incidence and Associated Risk Factors of Necrotic Enteritis in Belgian Layer Pullet Flocks. Avian Pathol. 49 (5), 476–485. doi:10.1080/03079457.2020.1772460

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hofacre C., Reynolds D., Mathis G., Lumpkins B., Ollis N., Smith J., et al. (2019). Effect of a Competitive Exclusion Culture in a Necrotic Enteritis Challenge Model in Broilers. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 28 (2), 350–355. doi:10.3382/japr/pfy078

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jayaraman S., Thangavel G., Kurian H., Mani R., Mukkalil R., Chirakkal H. (2013). Bacillus Subtilis PB6 Improves Intestinal Health of Broiler Chickens Challenged with Clostridium Perfringens-Induced Necrotic Enteritis. Poult. Sci. 92 (2), 370–374. doi:10.3382/ps.2012-02528

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Johansson A., Aspán A., Kaldhusdal M., Engström B. E. (2010). Genetic Diversity and Prevalence of netB in Clostridium perfringens Isolated from a Broiler Flock Affected by Mild Necrotic Enteritis. Vet. Microbiol. 144 (1-2), 87–92. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.12.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaldhusdal M., Benestad S. L., Løvland A. (2016). Epidemiologic Aspects of Necrotic Enteritis in Broiler Chickens - Disease Occurrence and Production Performance. Avian Pathol. 45 (3), 271–274. doi:10.1080/03079457.2016.1163521

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kiu R., Brown J., Bedwell H., Leclaire C., Caim S., Pickard D., et al. (2019). Genomic Analysis on Broiler-Associated Clostridium perfringens Strains and Exploratory Caecal Microbiome Investigation Reveals Key Factors Linked to Poultry Necrotic Enteritis. Anim. Microbiome 1 (1), 12–14. doi:10.1186/s42523-019-0015-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lacey J. A., Keyburn A. L., Ford M. E., Portela R. W., Johanesen P. A., Lyras D., et al. (2017). Conjugation-mediated Horizontal Gene Transfer of Clostridium perfringens Plasmids in the Chicken Gastrointestinal Tract Results in the Formation of New Virulent Strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83 (24), e01814–17. doi:10.1128/AEM.01814-17

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee K. W., Lillehoj H. S., Jeong W., Jeoung H. Y., An D. J. (2011). Avian Necrotic Enteritis: Experimental Models, Host Immunity, Pathogenesis, Risk Factors, and Vaccine Development. Poult. Sci. 90 (7), 1381–1390. doi:10.3382/ps.2010-01319

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee S. A., Apajalahti J., Vienola K., González-Ortiz G., Fontes C. M. G. A., Bedford M. R. (2017). Age and Dietary Xylanase Supplementation Affects Ileal Sugar Residues and Short Chain Fatty Acid Concentration in the Ileum and Caecum of Broiler Chickens. Animal Feed Sci. Technol. 234, 29–42. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.07.017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee S. H., Lillehoj H. S., Jang S. I., Lillehoj E. P., Min W., Bravo D. M. (2013). Dietary Supplementation of Young Broiler Chickens with Capsicum and Turmeric Oleoresins Increases Resistance to Necrotic Enteritis. Br. J. Nutr. 110 (5), 840–847. doi:10.1017/s0007114512006083

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li M., Penner G. B., Hernandez-Sanabria E., Oba M., Guan L. L. (2009). Effects of Sampling Location and Time, and Host Animal on Assessment of Bacterial Diversity and Fermentation Parameters in the Bovine Rumen. J. Appl. Microbiol. 107 (6), 1924–1934. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04376.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lovland A., Kaldhusdal M. (1999). Liver Lesions Seen at Slaughter as an Indicator of Necrotic Enteritis in Broiler Flocks. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 24 (3), 345–351.

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lovland A., Kaldhusdal M., Reitan L. J. (2003). Diagnosing Clostridium Perfringens-Associated Necrotic Enteritis in Broiler Flocks by an Immunoglobulin G Anti-alpha-toxin Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay. Avian Pathol. 32 (5), 527–534. doi:10.1080/0307945031000154134

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lovland A., Kaldhusdal M. (2001). Severely Impaired Production Performance in Broiler Flocks with High Incidence of Clostridium Perfringens-Associated Hepatitis. Avian Pathol. 30 (1), 73–81. doi:10.1080/03079450020023230

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

M'Sadeq S. A., Wu S.-B., Choct M., Forder R., Swick R. A. (2015). Use of Yeast Cell Wall Extract as a Tool to Reduce the Impact of Necrotic Enteritis in Broilers. Poult. Sci. 94 (5), 898–905. doi:10.3382/ps/pev035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martin T. G., Smyth J. A. (2010). The Ability of Disease and Non-disease Producing Strains of Clostridium perfringens from Chickens to Adhere to Extracellular Matrix Molecules and Caco-2 Cells. Anaerobe 16 (5), 533–539. doi:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2010.07.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McDevitt R. M., Brooker J. D., Acamovic T., Sparks N. H. C. (2006). Necrotic Enteritis; a Continuing Challenge for the Poultry Industry. World's Poult. Sci. J. 62 (2), 221–247. doi:10.1079/wps200593

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McReynolds J. L., Byrd J. A., Anderson R. C., Moore R. W., Edrington T. S., Genovese K. J., et al. (2004). Evaluation of Immunosuppressants and Dietary Mechanisms in an Experimental Disease Model for Necrotic Enteritis. Poult. Sci. 83 (12), 1948–1952. doi:10.1093/ps/83.12.1948

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moore R. J. (2016). Necrotic Enteritis Predisposing Factors in Broiler Chickens. Avian Pathol. 45 (3), 275–281. doi:10.1080/03079457.2016.1150587

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mwangi S., Timmons J., Fitz-Coy S., Parveen S. (2019). Characterization of Clostridium perfringens Recovered from Broiler Chicken Affected by Necrotic Enteritis. Poult. Sci. 98 (1), 128–135. doi:10.3382/ps/pey332

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ohtani K., Shimizu T. (2015). Regulation of Toxin Gene Expression in Clostridium perfringens. Res. Microbiol. 166 (4), 280–289. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2014.09.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Onrust L., Van Driessche K., Ducatelle R., Schwarzer K., Haesebrouck F., Van Immerseel F. (2018). Valeric Acid Glyceride Esters in Feed Promote Broiler Performance and Reduce the Incidence of Necrotic Enteritis. Poult. Sci. 97 (7), 2303–2311. doi:10.3382/ps/pey085

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Palliyeguru M. W. C. D., Rose S. P., Mackenzie A. M. (2010). Effect of Dietary Protein Concentrates on the Incidence of Subclinical Necrotic Enteritis and Growth Performance of Broiler Chickens. Poult. Sci. 89 (1), 34–43. doi:10.3382/ps.2009-00105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Park S. S., Lillehoj H. S., Allen P. C., Park D. W., FitzCoy S., Bautista D. A., et al. (2008). Immunopathology and Cytokine Responses in Broiler Chickens Coinfected with Eimeria Maxima and Clostridium perfringens with the Use of an Animal Model of Necrotic Enteritis. Avian Dis. 52 (1), 14–22. doi:10.1637/7997-041707-reg

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Parreira V. R., Costa M., Eikmeyer F., Blom J., Prescott J. F. (2012). Sequence of Two Plasmids from Clostridium perfringens Chicken Necrotic Enteritis Isolates and Comparison with C. perfringens Conjugative Plasmids. PLoS One 7 (11), e49753. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049753

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Parreira V. R., Russell K., Athanasiadou S., Prescott J. F. (2016). Comparative Transcriptome Analysis by RNAseq of Necrotic Enteritis Clostridium perfringens during In Vivo Colonization and In Vitro Conditions. BMC Microbiol. 16 (1), 186. doi:10.1186/s12866-016-0792-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shojadoost B., Vince A. R., Prescott J. F. (2012). The Successful Experimental Induction of Necrotic Enteritis in Chickens by Clostridium perfringens: a Critical Review. Vet. Res. 43 (1), 74. doi:10.1186/1297-9716-43-74

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stanley D., Wu S.-B., Rodgers N., Swick R. A., Moore R. J. (2014). Differential Responses of Cecal Microbiota to Fishmeal, Eimeria and Clostridium perfringens in a Necrotic Enteritis Challenge Model in Chickens. PloS One 9 (8), e104739. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0104739

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Timbermont L., Lanckriet A., Pasmans F., Haesebrouck F., Ducatelle R., Van Immerseel F. (2009). Intra-species Growth-Inhibition by Clostridium perfringens Is a Possible Virulence Trait in Necrotic Enteritis in Broilers. Vet. Microbiol. 137 (3-4), 388–391. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.01.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Timbermont L., De Smet L., Van Nieuwerburgh F., Parreira V. R., Van Driessche G., Haesebrouck F., et al. (2014). Perfrin, a Novel Bacteriocin Associated with netB Positive Clostridium perfringens Strains from Broilers with Necrotic Enteritis. Vet. Res. 45 (1), 40. doi:10.1186/1297-9716-45-40

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vidal J. E., Ohtani K., Shimizu T., McClane B. A. (2009). Contact with Enterocyte-like Caco-2 Cells Induces Rapid Upregulation of Toxin Production byClostridium Perfringenstype C Isolates. Cell. Microbiol. 11 (9), 1306–1328. doi:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01332.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wade B., Keyburn A. (2015). The True Cost of Necrotic Enteritis. Poult. World. 31 (7), 16–17.

Google Scholar

Wade B., Keyburn A. L., Seemann T., Rood J. I., Moore R. J. (2015). Binding of Clostridium perfringens to Collagen Correlates with the Ability to Cause Necrotic Enteritis in Chickens. Vet. Microbiol. 180 (3-4), 299–303. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.09.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wilkie D. C., Van Kessel A. G., White L. J., Laarveld B., Drew M. D. (2005). Dietary Amino Acids Affect Intestinal Clostridium perfringens Populations in Broiler Chickens. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 85 (2), 185–193. doi:10.4141/a04-070

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Williams R. B. (2005). Intercurrent Coccidiosis and Necrotic Enteritis of Chickens: Rational, Integrated Disease Management by Maintenance of Gut Integrity. Avian Pathol. 34 (3), 159–180. doi:10.1080/03079450500112195

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Williams R. B., Marshall R. N., La Ragione R. M., Catchpole J. (2003). A New Method for the Experimental Production of Necrotic Enteritis and its Use for Studies on the Relationships between Necrotic Enteritis, Coccidiosis and Anticoccidial Vaccination of Chickens. Parasitol. Res. 90 (1), 19–26. doi:10.1007/s00436-002-0803-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wilson K. M., Chasser K. M., Duff A. F., Briggs W. N., Latorre J. D., Barta J. R., et al. (2018). Comparison of Multiple Methods for Induction of Necrotic Enteritis in Broilers. I. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 27 (4), 577–589. doi:10.3382/japr/pfy033

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu S.-B., Rodgers N., Choct M. (2010). Optimized Necrotic Enteritis Model Producing Clinical and Subclinical Infection of Clostridium perfringens in Broiler Chickens. Avian Dis. 54 (3), 1058–1065. doi:10.1637/9338-032910-reg.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang W.-Y., Chou C.-H., Wang C. (2018). Characterization of Toxin Genes and Quantitative Analysis of netB in Necrotic Enteritis (NE)-producing and non-NE-producing Clostridium perfringens Isolated from Chickens. Anaerobe 54, 115–120. doi:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2018.08.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: broiler chicken, Clostridium perfringens, environment, natural infection model, necrotic enteritis

Citation: He W, Goes EC, Wakaruk J, Barreda DR and Korver DR (2022) A Poultry Subclinical Necrotic Enteritis Disease Model Based on Natural Clostridium perfringens Uptake. Front. Physiol. 13:788592. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.788592

Received: 02 October 2021; Accepted: 29 April 2022;
Published: 08 June 2022.

Edited by:

Michael Kogut, United States Department of Agriculture, United States

Reviewed by:

Sara Salah Abdel-Hakeem, Assiut University, Egypt
Woo Kyun Kim, University of Georgia, United States

Copyright © 2022 He, Goes, Wakaruk, Barreda and Korver. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Daniel R. Barreda, d.barreda@ualberta.ca; Douglas R. Korver, dkorver@ualberta.ca

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.