Skip to main content

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Physiol., 11 October 2022
Sec. Striated Muscle Physiology
This article is part of the Research Topic The Fiber Profile of Skeletal Muscles as a Fingerprint of Muscle Quality View all 6 articles

Receptor subunit compositions underly distinct potencies of a muscle relaxant in fast and slow muscle fibers

Manami YamashitaManami YamashitaYoshihiro EgashiraYoshihiro EgashiraShuntaro NakamuraShuntaro NakamuraSouhei SakataSouhei SakataFumihito Ono
Fumihito Ono*
  • Department of Physiology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan

A line of studies in the 1960s–1980s suggested that muscle relaxants do not work uniformly on all skeletal muscles, though its mechanism has not been clarified. We showed here that a classical non-depolarizing muscle relaxant pancuronium inhibits fast muscle fibers at lower concentration compared to slow muscle fibers in zebrafish. The difference of effective concentration was observed in locomotion caused by tactile stimulation as well as in synaptic currents of the neuromuscular junction induced by motor neuron excitation. We further showed that this difference arises from the different composition of acetylcholine receptors between slow and fast muscle fibers in the neuromuscular junction of zebrafish. It will be interesting to examine the difference of subunit composition and sensitivity to muscle relaxants in other species.

Introduction

Skeletal muscle relaxants, first introduced to medical use in 1940s (Griffith and Johnson, 1942; Whitacre and Fisher, 1945), are now clinically indispensable for safe execution of surgeries (Murphy, 2018). They are also employed to alleviate pathological conditions, e.g., low back pain, neck pain, fibromyalgia, tension headache or myofascial pain syndrome (See and Ginzburg, 2008). A group of aminosteroids has been extensively developed and employed as muscle relaxants to block nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) in the neuromuscular junctions (NMJs) (Shafer, 2011; Hunter, 2017), though some muscle relaxants work independent from AChRs. Muscle relaxants working on AChRs are often classified into two classes depending on the presence or absence of depolarizing activity. Non-depolarizing muscle relaxants, such as pancuronium, vecuronium and rocuronium, inhibit the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor at the neuromuscular junction by blocking the binding of acetylcholine. Onset of action is relatively slow, and clinical effects last longer compared to depolarizing agents (Das et al., 2022). Pancuronium was developed in the 1960s, inspired by an alkaloid from the plant, malouetine (Lewis et al., 1967). Vecuronium and rocuronium were subsequently developed, and are now more widely used because of their compatibility with the reversal reagent sugammadex (Naguib, 2007).

Skeletal muscle cells in vertebrates comprise basically two types, slow (red) and fast (white), with additional intermediate types or subtypes depending on the species and researchers (Scott et al., 2001; Ahmed and Ali, 2016). Fast muscle fibers use energy generated by glycolysis and produce strong contractions, though prone to fatigue. In contrast, slow muscle fibers contract weakly while their reliance on oxidative metabolism makes them resistant to fatigue.

Whether a particular muscle relaxant affects all skeletal muscles with identical potency and efficacy was examined in the skeletal muscles of cats, with an interest centered on its clinical implications (Bonta and Goorissen, 1968; Day et al., 1983). These studies reported muscle relaxants have different potencies among muscles comprising different proportions of fast/slow muscle fibers, e.g., between soleus and gastrocnemius, which led authors to propose that slow and fast muscle fibers may have different potencies for muscle relaxants. However, the underlying mechanism has never been proposed, arguably because these studies predated the molecular identification of AChRs (Noda et al., 1982). After the cloning of receptor subunit genes, which suggested that subunit compositions are uniform across all muscle fibers, the issue of the potentially different sensitivities between muscle fibers was never revisited.

AChRs in the neuromuscular junctions (NMJs) are heteropentamers composed of five muscle specific subunits: 2α1s, β1, δ, and ε (or γ). α1 and β1 henceforth will be designated as α and β respectively for simplicity. In most vertebrates, γ subunits are expressed early in development and are replaced by ε in mature stages (Mishina et al., 1986). Recent studies showed that AChRs in zebrafish skeletal muscles have two distinct sets of subunit composition. While AChRs in fast muscle fibers have classical composition of αβδε/γ, those in slow muscle fibers lack ε/γ subunits and are composed of α, β and δ subunits (Mongeon et al., 2011).

Given the difference in subunit compositions, we hypothesized that AChRs may underlie the different sensitivities of slow and fast muscle fibers. Unlike mammalian muscles in which slow and fast fibers are intermingled in a single muscle, they are spatially segregated in fish skeletal muscles (Devote et al., 1996), which offers a unique advantage to test this hypothesis. We examined the locomotion and synaptic physiology in zebrafish. In addition, we studied heterologously expressed AChR subunits, and showed that the distinct potencies of pancuronium in fast and slow muscles fibers are caused by the subunit composition difference.

Materials and methods

Fish lines and maintenance

Zebrafish were maintained in a self-circulating system at the Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. All experimental protocols were approved by the IACUC at Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University.

High-speed video recordings and kinematic analysis

The movements of embryos were recorded using a digital high-speed video camera (Kron Technologies) attached to a dissecting microscope (Olympus). All recordings were performed at 23°C–27°C. The intact embryo at 24 hpf was attached to a suction pipette and oriented for recording. As little suction as possible was applied to minimize tissue damage. Under this condition, spontaneous coiling was recorded at 100 frames/s. Touch response of 72 hpf larvae was recorded at 1,000 frames/s. A puff stimulus with a glass pipette was used to elicit escape behaviors. The puff pipette was positioned close to the tip of the fish tail, and positive pressure (30 psi, 20 ms) was applied using a pulse pressure device (Parker Hannifin). By manually measuring the head (or tail) turn angle (θ) for each frame, the head turn speed and distance traveled were calculated. 0–10 mM of pancuronium was dissolved in solution containing 0.006% sea salt and 0.01% methylene blue and used for experiments.

Establishment of a transgenic zebrafish line Tg (hb9:tTAad, TRE:ChRFR-TagRFP)

The zebrafish hb9 promoter was used to drive the expression of the advanced tetracycline transactivator (tTAad), specifically in motor neurons (Egashira et al., 2022). The tTA response element (TRE) composite promoter that drives the expression of channelrhodopsin fast receiver (ChRFR) (Wang et al., 2009) fused with TagRFP was also cloned into the same plasmid. The Tet inducible system strongly enhanced the expression of ChRFR in Tg motor neurons, allowing reliable recording of EPCs by optogenetic stimulation. Tg fish were generated by co-injection of the purified plasmid (25 ng/μl) and tol2 transposase mRNA (25 ng/μl) into one-cell stage embryos as described previously (Kawakami et al., 2004).

Zebrafish electrophysiology

Recordings of EPC in larval zebrafish was performed as previously described (Egashira et al., 2022). Whole-cell voltage clamp recording at a holding potential of −80 mV was performed from fast and slow muscles at room temperature (23°C–27°C). Tg (hb9:tTAad, TRE:ChRFR-TagRFP) zebrafish larvae (4–5 dpf) were anesthetized with 0.02% tricaine in standard extracellular solution containing 112 mM NaCl, 2.0 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM glucose, 2 mM CaCl2, and 1 mM MgCl2 (pH 7.3–7.4). The skin, head, and internal organs were then removed. To minimize muscle contraction in response to optogenetic stimulation, the fish preparation was treated with 1 μM μ-conotoxin GIIIA (Alomone labs) for 5 min and then transferred to a recording chamber perfused with high Mg2+ extracellular solution, in which MgCl2 was 5 mM. To activate ChRFR, brief flash of light from a 470 nm high-power LED (LED Engine) was delivered through the 40× objective. Flash duration was controlled by Patchmaster software (HEKA). The patch pipette internal solution contained 120 mM K-methanesulfonate, 5 mM KCl, 5 mM EGTA, and 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.2–7.3). Data acquired with an EPC10 amplifier (HEKA) were digitized at 50 kHz and low-pass filtered at 3 kHz. The series resistance was typically ∼10 MΩ and was not compensated. Recordings with series resistance >15 MΩ or >25% change in series resistance were excluded from the analysis.

In vitro synthesis of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor mRNA

cDNAs for the muscle subunits α1, β1, δ, ε were cloned from zebrafish (Mongeon et al., 2011). cDNA of each subunit was cloned into the pTNT vector (Promega) for in vitro transcription. The purified DNA plasmid was linearized at the BamHI site and in vitro transcribed with T7 RNA polymerase (mMESSAGE mMACHINE T7 Transcription kit; Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Oocyte electrophysiology

Electrophysiology was performed with a two-electrode voltage clamp (TEVC) using OC-725C (Warner Instruments) as reported previously (Hashimoto et al., 2022). ND 96 solution consisting of (in mM) 5 HEPES, 96 NaCl, 2 KCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, pH7.5 was used as the bath solution.

Statistics

All data were expressed as mean ± SEM. Student’s t-test, paired t-test, Student’s t-test was used to determine the significance of difference. For multiple comparison test, p-value was corrected with Bonferroni.

Results

Effects of pancuronium on zebrafish locomotion

In zebrafish embryos at 24 h post fertilization (hpf), tactile stimulation induces coiling, which consists of 1-3 alternating contractions of the trunk. This locomotion depends on slow muscles, because mutants lacking functional fast muscles display normal coiling (Naganawa and Hirata, 2011; Zempo et al., 2020). In contrast, burst swimming after 48 hpf depends on fast muscles (Naganawa and Hirata, 2011).

Taking advantage of the dependence on distinct populations of muscles for locomotion at 24 and 72 hps, we examined the effect of pancuronium on slow and fast muscles. Coiling at 24 hpf and burst swimming at 72 hpf occuring spontaneously or elicited upon touch were recorded under stereomicroscope (Figure 1). The percentage of embryos judged to perform coiling or burst swimming was plotted against the concentration of pancuronium (Figure 1A). Burst swimming at 72 hpf was more sensitive, with only ∼20% of embryos responding to touch at 1 mM pancuronium. More than 80% of embryos at 24 hpf responded to the same concentration of pancuronium.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. The effect of pancuronium on locomotor activity of zebrafish larvae. (A) Concentration dependent effects of pancuronium on locomotor activity of zebrafish larvae at 24 and 72 hpf. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, Student’s t-test with bonferroni correction). (B) Superimposed images of spontaneous coiling at 24 hpf (left, control; right, 0.5 mM pancuronium). An inset represents the head-tail angle (θ). Max turn angle and max turn speed of spontaneous coiling at 24 hpf are displayed. (Student’s t-test). (C) Superimposed images of touch response at 72 hpf (left, control; right, 0.5 mM pancuronium). An inset represents the head-turn angle (θ). Traveled distance, max turn angle and max turn speed of touch response at 72 hpf are displayed. (**p < 0.01, paired t-test).

We also examined specific parameters of spontaneous coiling and touch response using a high-speed camera. All embryos at 24 hpf responded to touch at 0.5 mM pancuronium (Figure 1A). At 0.5 mM pancuronium, the maximum turn angle and the maximum turn speed of embryos in spontaneous coiling was not changed compared to 0 mM control (Figure 1B). In contrast, treatment in pancuronium significantly reduced distance traveled, max turn angle and max turn speed at 72 hpf (Figure 1C). These results suggest that slow muscles are more resistant to pancuronium compared to fast muscles.

Synaptic currents at the neuromuscular junction

The different effects of pancuronium on locomotion at 24 and 72 hpf may result from its potencies for AChRs in slow and fast muscles, as we expected. Alternatively, the difference may arise from other factors such as the absorption and the metabolism of pancuronium. To directly test the effect of pancuronium on NMJs, we recorded end-plate currents (EPCs) from fast and slow muscle of zebrafish.

To perform the experiment, we expressed channelrhodopsin in motor neurons using a motor neuron specific promoter hb9. Channelrhodopsin was fused with TagRFP as an expression marker. A stable line harboring the clone was established, in which motor neurons expressed TagRFP signals (Figure 2A) at 4 dpf. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were performed from innervated fast or slow muscles. Blue light stimulation of motor neurons immediately depolarized all motor neurons, which induced them to generate action potentials. The EPCs recorded from voltage clamped muscle cells increased stepwise with the length of the light stimulus (data not shown), consistent with multiple innervation on a single muscle fiber in zebrafish (Westerfield et al., 1986). A robust current was triggered faithfully by 1 ms blue light stimulation both in fast and slow muscles.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. The effect of pancuronium on end-plate currents in fast and slow muscle fibers. (A) Fluorescent image of 4 dpf Tg (hb9:tTAad, TRE:ChRFR-TagRFP) zebrafish. Motor neurons specifically expressed channelrhodopsin fused with TagRFP. (B) Representative current traces from fast (top) and slow (bottom) muscle fibers in response to the light stimulation in the presence of pancuronium, whose concentration in the solution is indicated above the traces. Note some of the traces have notches, which result from the non-overlapping time course of inputs from multiple motor neurons innervating the muscle cell. (*p < 0.05, Student’s t-test with bonferroni correction) (C) The effect of pancuronium on EPC charges. Light-evoked EPCs were recorded in the varying concentration of pancuronium.

Both at 0.1 and 1 μM pancuronium, the synaptic current was suppressed stronger in fast fibers (Figures 2B,C). This suggests that pancuronium has stronger potency for AChRs in fast fibers.

Heterologous expression of zebrafish subunit clones

Previous studies showed that AChRs in fast muscles of zebrafish are composed of αβδε or αβδγ, while those in slow muscles lack ε/γ (Mongeon et al., 2011). To test whether the different response to pancuronium observed in synaptic currents (Figure 2) was caused by different subunit compositions, we heterologously expressed two combinations of subunits, αβδε or αβδ, and examined the effects of pancuronium on the observed ACh-induced current. mRNA for each subunit was synthesized from zebrafish genes and injected into unfertilized Xenopus oocytes. After incubation for 2–3 days, AChR currents were measured under the two-electrode voltage clamp. Normalized ACh-induced current amplitude was plotted against the concentration of pancuronium. The fitted curve generated from the αβδε subunits was left-shifted compared to the αβδ subunits (Figure 3), reaching ∼0 at 1 μM (IC50 was 15.6 ± 1.1 nM for αβδε and 96.2 ± 20.3 nM for αβδ, p = 0.016, Student’s t-test). This result is in line with those of locomotion and synapse physiology (Figures 1, 2), and suggests that AChRs consisting of αβδε subunits in fast muscles are more sensitive to pancuronium than those in slow muscles comprising αβδ subunits.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 3. Concentration-dependent effects of pancuronium for inhibition of acetylcholine-induced current in oocytes expressing zebrafish fast (αβδε) or slow muscle-type (αβδ) nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

Discussion

In this study, we revisited a question which has remained unanswered since the 1960s, and showed that pancuronium is more effective on fast muscle fibers than on slow muscle fibers, due to the different subunit compositions of nAChRs associated with each fiber type.

The IC50 of pancuronium for slow fibers and fast fibers was comparable between synaptic currents (Figure 2) and heterologous expression in Xenopus oocytes (Figure 3). Compared to these preparations, the concentration of pancuronium necessary to inhibit locomotion was ∼10,000 times higher (Table1). The absorption and the metabolic dynamics of pancuronium in intact larvae may make the higher concentration in the surrounding solution obligatory to achieve the effective concentration in the NMJ. This difference is indeed comparable to the observation for glycine receptors when inhibited by its antagonist strychnine (David-Watine et al., 1999; Roy et al., 2012).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 1. IC50 for two types of AChRs estimated from three experiments.

The difference between fast muscle (αβδε) and slow muscle (αβδ), on the other hand, was more pronounced in oocytes compared to muscles (Table 1). This difference may result from the environment in which receptors were expressed: e.g., post-translational modification or membrane properties. Accessibility of applied pancuronium to fast and slow muscles may also have contributed to the difference, because slow muscles are located near the surface whereas fast cells are located deeper (Luna et al., 2015; Zempo et al., 2020).

The α subunits, characterized by the presence of two vicinal cysteines, contribute to the ligand binding site for acetylcholine (Weber and Changeux, 1974; Noda et al., 1982; Kao et al., 1984; Neumann et al., 1984, 1986; Sine et al., 1990). Heterologous expression of murine or Torpedo clones revealed that the acetylcholine binding sites are located at the interfaces of the α/γ and the α/δ subunits (Kurosaki et al., 1987; Sine et al., 1990; Sine and Claudio, 1991; Sine, 1993). Pancuronium, a non-depolarizing relaxant, is generally supposed to compete with ACh for a common binding site. Our study showed the difference in the affinity between αβδε and αβδ (Figures 2, 3). The contribution of the γ subunit will be negligible at the developmental stages where behavior and synaptic physiology were analyzed (Figures 1, 2), based on the expression time course of the γ subunit gene (Naganawa and Hirata, 2011; Walogorsky et al., 2012). The main difference of the binding sites may therefore result from the α/ε interface, which does not exist in the αβδ composition. Alternatively, the binding of pancuronium may occur not at the ACh binding site but at an unexpected moiety of the AChR pentamer.

Zebrafish is a good system to examine the fiber-specific effects of muscle relaxants, thanks to its amenability to multiple techniques used in this study, as well as their segregated distribution of slow and fast fibers. It is also possible that the current observation for pancuronium may be extended to other types of muscle relaxants. It remains unknown whether mammalian slow fibers, or a subpopulation of them, have αβδ compositions similar to zebrafish NMJs. It will be interesting to examine whether NMJs in species other than zebrafish also contain AChRs with the αβδ composition, and have distinct potencies of muscle relaxants depending on the fiber type.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the IACUC at Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University.

Author contributions

MY and FO designed the study. MY, YE, SN, and SS performed experiments and analyzed data. MY and FO wrote the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by Grant-in-aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI 21K15348 to MY, 21K06429 to YE, and 18K06882 to FO).

Acknowledgments

We thank Ms. Natsuko Okuda for maintaining the Zebrafish and Xenopus colonies. We thank Dr. Declan W. Ali for critical reading of the manuscript. We thank students at OMPU, Mr. Shunsuke Tada, Mr. Kazuki Nishimura, and Mr. Takato Yamada for their help in some of the recordings.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Ahmed K., Ali D. (2016). Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) at zebrafish red and white muscle show different properties during development. Dev. Neurobiol. 76, 916–936. doi:10.1002/dneu.22366

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bonta I. L., Goorissen E. M. (1968). Different potency of pancuronium bromide on two types of skeletal muscle. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 4, 303–308. doi:10.1016/0014-2999(68)90098-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Das G. N., Shrma P., Maani C. V. (2022). Pancuronium. Statpearls. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing.

Google Scholar

David-Watine B., Goblet C., de Saint Jan D., Fucile S., Devignot V., Bregestovski P., et al. (1999). Cloning, expression and electrophysiological characterization of glycine receptor alpha subunit from zebrafish. Neuroscience 90 (1), 303–317. doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00430-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Day N. S., Blake G. J., Standaert F. G., Dretchen K. L. (1983). Characterization of the train-of-four response in fast and slow muscles: effect of d-tubocurarine, pancuronium, and vecuronium. Anesthesiology 58, 414–417. doi:10.1097/00000542-198305000-00004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Devote S., Melançon E., Eisen J., Westerfield M. (1996). Identification of separate slow and fast muscle precursor cells in vivo, prior to somite formation. Development 122, 3371–3380. doi:10.1242/DEV.122.11.3371

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Egashira Y., Kumade A., Ojida A., Ono F. (2022). Spontaneously recycling synaptic vesicles constitute readily releasable vesicles in intact neuromuscular synapses. J. Neurosci. 42, 3523–3536. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2005-21.2022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Griffith H. R., Johnson G. E. (1942). The use of curare in general anesthesia. Anesthesiology 3, 418–420. doi:10.1097/00000542-194207000-00006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hashimoto R., Minoshima M., Sakata S., Ono F., Ishii H., Watakabe Y., et al. (2022). Efficient visible/NIR light-driven uncaging of hydroxylated thiazole orange-based caged compounds in aqueous media. Chem. Sci. 13, 7462–7467. doi:10.1039/D2SC02364D

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hunter J. M. (2017). Reversal of residual neuromuscular block: complications associated with perioperative management of muscle relaxation. Br. J. Anaesth. 119, i53–i62. doi:10.1093/bja/aex318

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kao P., Dwork A., Kaldany R., Silver M., Wideman J., Stein S., et al. (1984). Identification of the alpha subunit half-cystine specifically labeled by an affinity reagent for the acetylcholine receptor binding site. J. Biol. Chem. 259, 11662–11665. doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(20)71257-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kawakami K., Takeda H., Kawakami N., Kobayashi M., Matsuda N., Mishina M. (2004). A transposon-mediated gene trap approach identifies developmentally regulated genes in zebrafish. Dev. Cell 7, 133–144. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2004.06.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kurosaki T., Fukuda K., Konno T., Mori Y., Tanaka K., Mishina M., et al. (1987). Functional properties of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits expressed in various combinations. FEBS Lett. 214, 253–258. doi:10.1016/0014-5793(87)80065-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lewis J., Martin-Smith M., Muir T., Ross H. (1967). Steroidal monoquaternary ammonium salts with non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking activity. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 19, 502–508. doi:10.1111/J.2042-7158.1967.TB09579.X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Luna V. M., Daikoku E., Ono F. (2015). Slow" skeletal muscles across vertebrate species. Cell Biosci. 5, 62. doi:10.1186/s13578-015-0054-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mishina M., Takai T., Imoto K., Noda M., Takahashi T., Numa S., et al. (1986). Molecular distinction between fetal and adult forms of muscle acetylcholine receptor. Nature 321, 406–411. doi:10.1038/321406A0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mongeon R., Walogorsky M., Urban J., Mandel G., Ono F., Brehm P. (2011). An acetylcholine receptor lacking both γ and ε subunits mediates transmission in zebrafish slow muscle synapses. J. Gen. Physiol. 138, 353–366. doi:10.1085/JGP.201110649

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Murphy G. S. (2018). Neuromuscular Monitoring in the perioperative period. Anesth. Analg. 126, 464–468. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000002387

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Naganawa Y., Hirata H. (2011). Developmental transition of touch response from slow muscle-mediated coilings to fast muscle-mediated burst swimming in zebrafish. Dev. Biol. 355, 194–204. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.04.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Naguib M. (2007). Sugammadex: Another milestone in clinical neuromuscular pharmacology. Anesth. Analg. 104, 575–581. doi:10.1213/01.ANE.0000244594.63318.FC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Neumann D., Barchan D., Fridkin M., Fuchs S. (1986). Analysis of ligand binding to the synthetic dodecapeptide 185–196 of the acetylcholine receptor alpha subunit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 9250–9253. doi:10.1073/PNAS.83.23.9250

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Neumann D., Fridkin M., Fuchs S. (1984). Anti-acetylcholine receptor response achieved by immunization with a synthetic peptide from the receptor sequence. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 121, 673–679. doi:10.1016/0006-291X(84)90234-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Noda M., Takahashi H., Tanabe T., Toyosato M., Furutani Y., Hirose T., et al. (1982). Primary structure of α-subunit precursor of Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor deduced from cDNA sequence. Nature 299, 793–797. doi:10.1038/299793a0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Roy N. M., Arpie B., Lugo J., Linney E., Levin E. D., Cerutti D. (2012). Brief embryonic strychnine exposure in zebrafish causes long-term adult behavioral impairment with indications of embryonic synaptic changes. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 34 (6), 587–591. doi:10.1016/j.ntt.2012.08.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Scott W., Stevens J., Binder-Macleod S. A. (2001). Human skeletal muscle fiber type classifications. Phys. Ther. 81, 1810–1816. doi:10.1093/PTJ/81.11.1810

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

See S., Ginzburg R. (2008). Choosing a skeletal muscle relaxant. Am. Fam. Physician 78, 365–370.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Shafer S. L. (2011). From d -tubocurarine to sugammadex: the contributions of T. Cecil gray to modern anaesthetic practice. Br. J. Anaesth. 107, 97–102. doi:10.1093/bja/aer117

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sine S. M., Claudio T. (1991). Gamma- and delta-subunits regulate the affinity and the cooperativity of ligand binding to the acetylcholine receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 19369–19377. doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)55007-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sine S. M., Claudio T., Sigworth F. J. (1990). Activation of Torpedo acetylcholine receptors expressed in mouse fibroblasts. Single channel current kinetics reveal distinct agonist binding affinities. J. Gen. Physiol. 96, 395–437. doi:10.1085/JGP.96.2.395

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sine S. M. (1993). Molecular dissection of subunit interfaces in the acetylcholine receptor: identification of residues that determine curare selectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 9436–9440. doi:10.1073/PNAS.90.20.9436

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Walogorsky M., Mongeon R., Wen H., Nelson N. R., Urban J. M., Ono F., et al. (2012). Zebrafish model for congenital myasthenic syndrome reveals mechanisms causal to developmental recovery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109 (43), 17711–17716. doi:10.1073/pnas.1215858109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang H., Sugiyama Y., Hikima T., Sugano E., Tomita H., Takahashi T., et al. (2009). Molecular determinants differentiating photocurrent properties of two channelrhodopsins from chlamydomonas. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 5685–5696. doi:10.1074/JBC.M807632200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weber M., Changeux J. P. (1974). Binding of Naja nigricollis (3H)alpha-toxin to membrane fragments from Electrophorus and Torpedo electric organs. II. Effect of cholinergic agonists and antagonists on the binding of the tritiated alpha-neurotoxin. Mol. Pharmacol. 10, 15–34.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Westerfield M., McMurray J. V., Eisen J. S. (1986). Identified motoneurons and their innervation of axial muscles in the zebrafish. J. Neurosci. 6, 2267–2277. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.06-08-02267.1986

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Whitacre R. J., Fisher A. J. (1945). Clinical observations on the use of curare in anesthesia. Anesthesiology 6, 124–130. doi:10.1097/00000542-194503000-00002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zempo B., Yamamoto Y., Williams T., Ono F. (2020). Synaptic silencing of fast muscle is compensated by rewired innervation of slow muscle. Sci. Adv. 6, eaax8382. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aax8382

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: acetylcholine receptor (AChR), muscle relaxant, neuromuscular junction, zebrafish, muscle type

Citation: Yamashita M, Egashira Y, Nakamura S, Sakata S and Ono F (2022) Receptor subunit compositions underly distinct potencies of a muscle relaxant in fast and slow muscle fibers. Front. Physiol. 13:1026646. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1026646

Received: 27 August 2022; Accepted: 28 September 2022;
Published: 11 October 2022.

Edited by:

Robert J. Bloch, University of Maryland, Baltimore, United States

Reviewed by:

Robin Lewis Cooper, University of Kentucky, United States
Mendell Rimer, Texas A&M Health Science Center, United States

Copyright © 2022 Yamashita, Egashira, Nakamura, Sakata and Ono. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Fumihito Ono, ZnVtaWhpdG8ub25vQG9tcHUuYWMuanA=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.