Abstract
The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has emerged at the end of 2019 and caused a global pandemic. The disease predominantly affects the respiratory system; however, there is evidence that it is a multisystem disease that also impacts the cardiovascular system. Although the long-term consequences of COVID-19 are not well-known, evidence from similar diseases alerts for the possibility of long-term impaired physical function and reduced quality of life, especially in those requiring critical care. Therefore, rehabilitation strategies are needed to improve outcomes in COVID-19 survivors. Among the possible strategies, resistance training (RT) might be particularly interesting, since it has been shown to increase functional capacity both in acute and chronic respiratory conditions and in cardiac patients. The present article aims to propose evidence-based and practical suggestions for RT prescription for people who have been diagnosed with COVID-19 with a special focus on immune, respiratory, and cardiovascular systems. Based on the current literature, we present RT as a possible safe and feasible activity that can be time-efficient and easy to be implemented in different settings.
The Problem
The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has posed a great threat to public health concern and safety (Wu et al., 2020; Zu et al., 2020). Caused by acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (or SARS-CoV-2), COVID-19 is characterized by respiratory distress and multisystem disease, which is frequently severe and might result in death (Kreutz et al., 2020). Many COVID-19 survivors who required critical care may develop psychological, physical, and cognitive impairments (Barker-Davies et al., 2020). There is evidence that coronaviruses may induce neurological impairments by invading the central nervous system and some patients may have symptoms like severe muscle pain (Li Y. C. et al., 2020). COVID results in relevant morbidity for 3–6 months (intermediate phase), and rehabilitation services and medical care might be needed for more than 12 months (chronic phase) (Barker-Davies et al., 2020).
Previous studies showed that survivors of acute respiratory diseases might have persistent functional disability and psychological symptoms for as much as 1 year after discharge (Herridge et al., 2003; Tansey et al., 2007), with most of them showing extrapulmonary conditions, with muscle wasting and weakness being most frequent (Herridge et al., 2003). Moreover, many COVID-19 patients will need to be on intensive care units, which is associated with symptoms like dyspnea, anxiety, depression, impaired physical function, and poor quality of life for up to 12 months after discharge (Oeyen et al., 2010; Denehy and Elliott, 2012; Jackson et al., 2012). Among them, physical function is one of the factors least likely to recover to normal values as it is heavily affected by critical illness (Gerth et al., 2019). The cardinal manifestations include limb muscle weakness, muscle atrophy, and impairments in deep tendon reflexes (Li Z. et al., 2020). Neuromuscular weakness in the intensive care units can prolong the patient’s mechanical ventilation time and hospitalization. Therefore, rehabilitation should commence in the critical care setting, since early exercise prevents neuromuscular complications and improves functional status in critical illness, being considered effective, safe, and feasible (Sosnowski et al., 2015; Barker-Davies et al., 2020). Moreover, rehabilitation programs starting within the post-acute phase (<30 days) seem to bring the most benefits (Barker-Davies et al., 2020).
Besides all the knowledge about intensive care management and recovery, there is a paucity of evidence-based recommendations regarding rehabilitation following COVID-19. Among the possible strategies for rehabilitating COVID-19 patients survivors, resistance training (RT) that conventionally consists of the voluntary muscle contractions against some kind of external resistance might be particularly interesting, since it has been shown to be a safe and feasible strategy to increase functional capacity in both acute and chronic respiratory conditions (Troosters et al., 2010; Liao et al., 2015; Li et al., 2019; Rice et al., 2020). Based on the current scientific evidence, RT can be safe, time-efficient, and easy to be implemented in almost anywhere and with minimal resources (Gentil et al., 2020b; Souza et al., 2020). Therefore, the present article aims to propose evidence-based and practical suggestions for the use of RT for people who have been diagnosed with COVID-19 during different phases of disease, with a special focus on immune, respiratory, and cardiovascular systems.
Immune System
The immune system works through the coordinated functions of many cells to protect the organism against opportunistic infections (Pedersen and Hoffman-Goetz, 2000). Therefore, preserving or improving its function is important for people who were affected by COVID-19. There are evidences of either immune surveillance or immunodepression in response to exercise (Pedersen et al., 1998; Peake et al., 2017; Nieman and Wentz, 2019); however, the specific effects of RT on immune function have not being extensively studied (Freidenreich and Volek, 2012). Interestingly, people involved in endurance training are more commonly affected by immunodepression and illness (Nieman, 2007) when compared to strength and power sports (Alonso et al., 2010, 2012; Horn et al., 2010; Timpka et al., 2017), which might be a favorable point to RT (Natale et al., 2003; Gentil et al., 2020b). In general, the association between exercise and body immune defenses follows a J-shaped curve (Pedersen et al., 1998; Peake et al., 2017; Nieman and Wentz, 2019), improving with moderate amounts of physical exercise and decreasing with excessive or low amounts of exercise (Pedersen et al., 1998; Peake et al., 2017; Nieman and Wentz, 2019). This complex relation is negatively influenced by many factors, such as higher energy expenditure (Spence et al., 2007; Rama et al., 2013), increased exercise volume (Peters and Bateman, 1983; Gleeson et al., 2013; Siedlik et al., 2016), and metabolic stress (Pedersen and Hoffman-Goetz, 2000). In this sense, an acute bout of exercise might induce a suppressive effect on lymphocyte proliferative responses, with long-duration (longer than 1 h) and high-intensity exercise exhibiting a moderate suppressive effect (Siedlik et al., 2016).
A study by Davis et al. (1997) analyzed the effects of physical exercise on susceptibility to respiratory infection by using a murine model. The exercise design was composed of three groups: no exercise, moderate short-term exercise (30 min), and prolonged exercise to voluntary fatigue (2.5–3.5 h). According to the results, exercising to fatigue resulted in greater mortality rate (41%) than either no exercise or short-term moderate exercise. Although mortality rate tended to be lower after short-term moderate exercise (9%) than no exercise (16%), there was no significant difference between conditions. The results also showed a decrease in antiviral resistance after strenuous exercise within the lungs, in conjunction with increased susceptibility to respiratory infection in vivo. Although there is paucity of data linking the transitory immune suppression after strenuous exercise with chronic immune system impairment and subsequently infection risk (Nieman and Wentz, 2019), it is reasonable to suggest that exercise-induced immune suppression may impair the clearance of pathogen in acute illness COVID-19 patients. Therefore, even after the acute phase of the disease, physical exercise should ensure the adequate restoration of immune defense.
For these reasons, it might be advisable to avoid strenuous activities and adopt a reduced total training RT volume/duration (<45 min) to preserve immune function and decrease the risk of complications, particularly when the immune response is still compromised (Gleeson et al., 2013; Peake et al., 2017). With that in mind, low-volume RT should be recommended. Here, it is important to note that training sessions lasting a few minutes have been suggested to promote muscle strength and size gains in different populations (Fisher J. et al., 2017; Souza et al., 2020). From a practical standpoint, previous studies showed that untrained young and older adults can obtain many health benefits (e.g., increased functionality and cardiovascular improvements) from minimal dose RT protocols involving two sets of three to four basic exercises with a training frequency of one or two sessions per week (Fisher et al., 2014; de Barbalho et al., 2017; Seguro et al., 2019; Souza et al., 2019; Dias et al., 2020).
It is important to consider that rises in epinephrine, cortisol, and sympathetic modulation seem to be related to immunosuppression induced by exercise (Pedersen and Hoffman-Goetz, 2000; Nieman and Wentz, 2019). In this regard, previous studies have shown an association between elevated metabolic stress, cortisol levels, and immunosuppression in response to RT (Miles et al., 2003; Ramel et al., 2003; Krüger et al., 2011). Therefore, it might be interesting to avoid such responses in COVID-19 survivors under rehabilitation. According to previous studies, RT protocols with a few number of repetitions (≤6 repetitions) and long between-sets rest intervals (≥3 min) result in less pronounced increases in sympathetic activity, cortisol, and lactate levels (Kraemer et al., 1990; Smilios et al., 2003, 2007; Vale et al., 2018). Moreover, low-volume RT with few repetitions is less glycolytic (Knuiman et al., 2015). Therefore, it could prevent the concurrency for energy substrate and subsequent immunosuppression, since glucose is the main fuel of immune cells (Palmer et al., 2015).
Regarding time of the day, studies involving endurance activities showed that the acute increases in leukocytes were higher when exercise was performed during the night (6 PM) when compared to morning (9 AM), and it remained high for 1 h after exercise in a hot and humid weather (Boukelia et al., 2018). When comparing exercise during the morning and afternoon (9 AM vs. 4 PM) in a cold environment, Boukelia et al. (2017) found higher immune function and less pulmonary inflammation during afternoon exercise. We could not find specific studies with RT; however, it has been previously shown that plasma cortisol levels are increased during the morning (Hayes et al., 2010), which could suggest an impaired immune function. Therefore, the suggestion is to train in the afternoon or early night.
The basis of COVID-19 pathogenesis is associated with a delayed antiviral response followed by an immunological overreaction that results in an excessive proinflammatory state (Castelli et al., 2020). The levels of systemic inflammation might explain the severity of the disease, with the most affected patients presenting higher serum levels of proinflammatory cytokine, as well as reduced T lymphocytes count (Chen et al., 2020). Regulatory T lymphocyte (Treg) is also reduced in severely ill patients and seems to play an important role in COVID-19 pathogenesis, since it is associated with controlling autoimmune and proinflammatory response (Gladstone et al., 2020; Stephen-Victor et al., 2020). In this context, RT may contribute to control proinflammatory state (Chupel et al., 2017; Santiago et al., 2018; Lammers et al., 2020). Despite the fact that studies investigating the effect of RT on Treg cells are scarce (Dorneles et al., 2020), a previous study in murine model showed that RT can upregulate this immune marker (Souza et al., 2017). Moreover, regular practice of RT increases the levels of interleukin-10, an anti-inflammatory cytokine that is mainly produced by Treg cells (Chupel et al., 2017; Lammers et al., 2020).
Respiratory System
The high levels of proinflammation mediators and histopathological changes in the lungs in response to SARS-CoV-2 might induce apoptosis in pulmonary endothelial and epithelial cells, leading to impaired respiratory function such as acute respiratory distress (Castelli et al., 2020). Additionally, persistent proinflammatory state in severe COVID-19 patients is associated with fibroblast proliferation in the alveolar septum, resulting in pulmonary interstitial fibrosis (Zhang et al., 2020). Pulmonary diseases are commonly associated with loss of muscle mass and function (Steiner, 2007; Bone et al., 2017). The analysis of previous outbreaks of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) revealed that 6–20% of the patients showed mild or moderate restrictive lung function consistent with muscle weakness 6–8 weeks after hospital discharge (Chan et al., 2003). This seems to persist for an even longer period as persistent pulmonary function impairment was present in 37% of the patients after recovery from SARS and their health status was also significantly worse compared with healthy subjects (Ong et al., 2005). Results from a cohort study showed significant impairment in lung capacity in 23.7% of SARS survivors 1 year after illness onset (Hui et al., 2005). Moreover, health status and exercise capacity were remarkably lower than those found in the normal population (Hui et al., 2005).
Previous studies showed that, in people with pulmonary diseases, low muscle strength is associated with physical inactivity (Osthoff et al., 2013) and is an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality independent of the degree of respiratory limitation (Swallow et al., 2007). Consequently, the key target in rehabilitation for pulmonary diseases should be improving locomotor muscle structure and function, as exercise results in reduced benefits on exertional ventilation, operating lung volumes, and respiratory muscle performance (Marillier et al., 2020). Moreover, the performance of physical exercise is advised as adjuvant non-pharmacological treatment during pulmonary fibrosis rehabilitation (Spruit et al., 2009).
RT has been suggested as an successful strategy for pulmonary rehabilitation, either performed alone or in conjunction with aerobic training, since it brings important increases in functional capacity (Liao et al., 2015; José and Dal Corso, 2016; Li et al., 2019). It is also important to highlight that exercise training during hospitalization due to acute respiratory conditions seems to bring important health and functional benefits, is well tolerated, and the adverse events are infrequent (Troosters et al., 2010; Rice et al., 2020). RT can be successfully performed as a stand-alone exercise strategy, without increasing adverse events in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients under pulmonary rehabilitation (Liao et al., 2015).
Considering that most people infected with SARS-CoV-2 could experience breathing difficulties, it is recommended to control the respiratory responses to exercise. One advantage of RT is that it might promote less cardiorespiratory stress (i.e., oxygen consumption and pulmonary ventilation) than aerobic exercise, even during maximal exercise testing (Houchen-Wolloff et al., 2014; Garnacho-Castaño et al., 2015; Albesa-Albiol et al., 2019). The manipulation of RT variables might further reduce the respiratory stress. Pulmonary ventilation and oxygen consumption increase with increased volume/duration (Haddock and Wilkin, 2006; Mookerjee et al., 2016; Garnacho-Castaño et al., 2018), lower rest intervals (Ratamess et al., 2007; Farinatti and Castinheiras Net, 2011), higher movement velocities (Mazzetti et al., 2011; Mukaimoto and Ohno, 2012; Buitrago et al., 2014), and higher number of repetitions (Scott et al., 2011; Ratamess et al., 2014). Therefore, training with lower number of repetitions, higher interval between sets, and controlled movement velocity might be recommended (Buitrago et al., 2013).
Cardiovascular System
Similar to other coronavirus infections, COVID-19 is associated with cardiac complications, especially arrhythmias, heart failure, and myocardial injury (Kochi et al., 2020; Madjid et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020). Acute cardiac injury is higher in those with increased mortality, with severe disease, and requiring ventilatory support (Kochi et al., 2020; Madjid et al., 2020). Cardiac complications have been suggested to be multifactorial. It may be caused by hypoxia, viral myocardial injury, hypotension, ACE2-receptor downregulation, drug toxicity, or elevated systemic inflammation (Kochi et al., 2020). The proinflammatory mediators associated with COVID-19 can result in vascular inflammation, myocarditis, and arrhythmic complications (Kochi et al., 2020; Madjid et al., 2020). Another complication regarding cardiovascular system is the increased risk of thromboembolism as a consequence of coagulopathy and endothelial vascular dysfunction in critical illness COVID-19 patients (Goshua et al., 2020).
Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 should be fully assessed and, if necessary, additional investigations may include resting electrocardiogram (ECG), blood exams, 24 h ECG, cardiopulmonary, echocardiogram, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, and exercise testing with the involvement of a cardiologist (Barker-Davies et al., 2020). In case of myocarditis, a period of 3–6 months of complete rest from strenuous exercise might be necessary, depending on the clinical severity illness duration (Pelliccia et al., 2019; Schellhorn et al., 2020). After returning, it is advisable to conduct periodic reassessment in the first 2 years due to an increased risk of silent clinical progression (Pelliccia et al., 2019).
RT has been shown to be safe and effective for several cardiac patients from different cardiac diseases and has been recommended as a core component of cardiac rehabilitation for many decades (McKelvie and McCartney, 1990; Verrill et al., 1992; Yamamoto et al., 2016). Some studies suggested that RT might be even safer than aerobic exercise, since it results in less myocardial stress and reduced hemodynamic responses in patients with heart diseases like controlled heart failure (Karlsdottir et al., 2002; Levinger et al., 2005), coronary arterial disease (Karlsdottir et al., 2002), and ischemic cardiomyopathy (McKelvie et al., 1995) and in patients in cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary intervention (Adams et al., 2010). Moreover, RT leads to improvements in cardiac autonomic control of diseased individuals (Bhati et al., 2019).
Cardiovascular stress might be more related to the duration of the exercise than with the load used, granting the use of higher loads and a lower number of repetitions. In this regard, Lamotte et al. (2005) reported higher levels of blood pressure and heart rate in response to RT using lower external loads and higher repetitions [four sets of 17 repetitions at 40% of the one-repetition maximum strength (1RM)] when compared with higher external loads and lower repetitions (four sets of 10 repetitions at 70% of 1RM) in 14 patients who participated in a rehabilitation program (e.g., bypass surgery, percutaneous coronary angioplasty, or valvular surgery). Similarly, Gjøvaag et al. (2016) reported higher levels of blood pressure and heart rate in patients with coronary arterial disease after performing 15RM with lower external loads than performing 4RM with higher external loads. Regarding autonomic modulation, Vale et al. (2018) showed that hypertensive women training with lower repetitions and higher external loads (6RM) showed less sympathetic activation and higher parasympathetic activation when compared to training with lower external loads and more repetitions (15RM). Therefore, in order to reduce cardiovascular stress during exercise, the recommended RT program should involve lower number of repetitions regardless of the load used.
One important feature in previous studies is that blood pressure and heart rate progressively increase over the sets, especially when the rest between sets is shorter (Gotshall et al., 1999; Lamotte et al., 2005; Gjøvaag et al., 2016). This suggests that one should consider performing a lower number of sets (one or two) and using higher rest between sets (≥3 min). Other additional strategies to reduce cardiovascular stress is to give short pauses (i.e., 5 s) in the middle of the sets (da Silva et al., 2007; Rúa-Alonso et al., 2020), avoid performing repetitions until muscle failure (MacDougall et al., 1992), and exercise during the afternoon, since cardiac reactivity is lower (Jones et al., 2006; Boukelia et al., 2018) and there is a better blood pressure control (Jones et al., 2008) at this period of the day.
Practical Recommendations
RT might be performed in many settings, including acute hospitalization and rehabilitation scenarios. Previous studies have shown that RT performed during intensive care units might bring important benefits either alone (Morris et al., 2016; Barbalho et al., 2019; Veldema et al., 2019) or combined with other activities (Eggmann et al., 2018). Interestingly, the benefits of RT in intensive care unit patients have been reported even in the presence of mechanical ventilation (Eggmann et al., 2018).
Another important concern with COVID-19 is the neuropsychiatric sequalae. In addition to pandemic-associated psychological distress, the direct and indirect effects of the coronavirus on the human central nervous system might be related to neuropsychiatric disorders such mood changes, sleep disorders, depression, and anxiety (Khatoon et al., 2020; Steardo et al., 2020; Troyer et al., 2020). Studies investigating COVID-19 patients found a high level of post-traumatic stress and depressive symptoms in comparison with non-infected people (Vindegaard and Eriksen Benros, 2020). In this regard, there are consistent evidence that RT is associated with improvements in depression (Gordon et al., 2018), anxiety (Gordon et al., 2017), and sleep disorders (Kovacevic et al., 2018), including patients with chronic diseases (Ferreira et al., 2020) and during rehabilitation (McCartney, 1998; Vincent and Vincent, 2012; Chan and Cheema, 2016; Andrade et al., 2018; Seguro et al., 2019). The potential benefits of RT for COVID-19 patients are illustrated in Figure 1.
FIGURE 1
RT programs commonly involve many exercises with the addition of isolated exercises for specific muscles, which might be too time-consuming. However, multi-joint exercises seem to be sufficient to improve muscle strength and hypertrophy in the muscles involved in the exercises (Gentil et al., 2015, 2017b; Paoli et al., 2017; Barbalho et al.,2020a,b) and there is no additional benefits in using single-joint exercises (Gentil et al., 2013; de França et al., 2015; Barbalho et al., 2020b). This allows the use of multi-joint exercises combined with low-volume programs, increasing feasibility and safety for most of the patients affected by COVID-19, hospitalized or not, including individuals with cardiometabolic diseases and frail elderly. Patients with COVID-19 that present severe body aches, sore throat, shortness of breath, chest pain, general fatigue, cough, or fever should avoid exercises between 2 and 3 weeks after the cessation of these symptoms. It is also recommended to avoid prolonged exhaustive or high-intensity exercise. These current restrictions to RT practice could be reviewed after cessation of the symptoms. COVID-19 patients that are asymptomatic should continue to exercise, as they would do normally. A pulmonary rehabilitation approach should be combined in the case on return from mild/moderate COVID-19 illness (Barker-Davies et al., 2020).
RT using non-traditional equipment such as elastic devices, which are low cost and portable, and can be performed in almost anywhere, might contribute to increase the possibilities for RT performance in many different settings, including intensive care units. Previous studies reported that RT using elastic bands or tubes resulted in similar muscle activation and mechanical stress (Aboodarda et al., 2011, 2016), strength gains (Martins et al., 2013), and improvements in functional capacity (Colado et al., 2010; Souza et al., 2019) when compared to traditional RT. Furthermore, RT might also be performed using body weight exercises as it promotes gains in muscle strength, hypertrophy, and body composition similar to traditional RT for many different populations, like middle-aged people with non-alcoholic fat liver disease (Takahashi et al., 2015, 2017), elderly people (Tsuzuku et al., 2017), and even young trained practitioners (Calatayud et al., 2015; Kikuchi and Nakazato, 2017).
Another possible limitation in rehabilitation settings is the belief that RT has to be performed with moderate to high loads (ACSM, 2009; Kraemer et al., 2002), as it is commonly suggested that it would be necessary to use loads ≥60% of 1RM for optimal gains in strength and muscle mass (McDonagh and Davies, 1984; ACSM, 2009). However, previous studies have shown that low external load RT might bring increases in muscle fitness and hypertrophy that are similar to conventional approaches, when effort is high (Fisher J. P. et al., 2017; Steele et al., 2019). Previous studies in both trained (Morton et al., 2016) and untrained people (Mitchell et al., 2012; Assunção et al., 2016) reported that RT with low external load resulted in similar increase in muscle strength and hypertrophy when compared to high external load. This is particularly evident when the strength tests not similar to the situations trained (Fisher J. P. et al., 2017). The caveats for using low external load are that it would require a higher number of repetitions and longer exercise times, which can result in more negative impact on the immune system and a higher stress on respiratory and cardiovascular systems, as suggested above. Therefore, the cost–benefit of such adaptations might be analyzed individually.
Significant physiological stimulus can also be obtained with maximal or near-maximal voluntary muscle contractions performed without external load. In this regard, previous studies reported high levels of muscle activation when performing RT with the intention to maximally contract the muscles and no external load (Gentil et al., 2017a; Alves et al., 2020). A previous study reported equivalent gains in arm muscle hypertrophy after traditional and no external load RT in young men and women, using a contralateral training design (Counts et al., 2016). Positive outcomes in terms of hypertrophy and functionality have also been reported in intensive care units patients (Barbalho et al., 2019).
Particularly in aging people, the performance of high-velocity RT might be considered as an alternative strategy when the performance of high or low external load RT with high effort is not possible or recommended (Fragala et al., 2019). High-velocity RT may provide superior increases on functional capacity in comparison with conventional RT (Bottaro et al., 2007; Nogueira et al., 2009; Ramírez-Campillo et al., 2014). A previous study suggested that high-velocity RT might be a feasible and safe strategy to revert or prevent functional decline during acute hospitalization (Martínez-Velilla et al., 2019). Thus, the performance of few repetitions using high-velocity concentric muscle action combined with long rest intervals and/or intra-set short pauses could provide significant gains on functionality while preventing higher cardiovascular stress (Lamotte et al., 2010; Dias et al., 2020). Considering that the use of light to moderate loads (e.g., 30–60% of 1RM) are recommended to optimize muscle power (Fragala et al., 2019), this might be easily achieved with small implements such light dumbbells or elastic devices. Therefore, equipment and implements should not be a barrier to implement RT programs during COVID-19 rehabilitation.
RT progression should be based on individual analysis, considering performance parameters and clinical symptoms. Initially, it is recommended that progression should be performed through increases in load, since higher number of sets and repetitions and lower rest intervals might impose unwanted risks. Therefore, the recommendation is to establish a repetition margin (i.e., 4–6RM) and increase load when the participant reaches the upper limit. When the patient reaches pre-COVID physical capacity, it would be interesting to re-examine for the possibility of restoring normal routine (Phelan et al., 2020).
Final Considerations
It is important to observe some general precautions for returning to exercise post-COVID-19, like monitoring temperature before training, starting with a muscle strengthening program prior to cardiovascular work, keeping social distancing, observing hygiene, adequate ventilation, and the use of masks when necessary (So et al., 2004; Gentil et al., 2020a). Another relevant point is the need to carefully evaluate clinical status and supervise patients that have been diagnosed with COVID-19, especially people with cardiac injuries (Barker-Davies et al., 2020), highlighting the need of a multidisciplinary approach. A subclinical myocardial injury may be present after clinical recovery from mild infections, even without cardiac symptoms or hospital admission. While the present article addresses RT for rehabilitation purposes, medical clearance is required. Therefore, a medical evaluation is recommended to exclude subclinical diseases before resuming high-intensity training or competition, eventually with exams such as transthoracic echocardiogram, maximal exercise testing, and 24 h Holter monitoring (Dores and Cardim, 2020; Wilson et al., 2020).
Considering the negligible chance of cardiac sequelae after asymptomatic infection or local symptoms of COVID-19, it is not necessary to perform pre-participation screening if a critical evaluation of signs and symptoms is negative and shows a complete recovery (Verwoert et al., 2020; Wilson et al., 2020). However, a pre-participation screening and cardiologist consultation may be considered for specific groups, including, but not limited to, people with pre-existent cardiovascular disease, elite athletes, and those with impaired recovery of exercise capacity.
For those with regional or symptoms not requiring hospitalization, it is strongly recommended to perform a pre-participation screening that includes physical examination, critical evaluation of symptoms, and a 12-lead ECG (Verwoert et al., 2020; Wilson et al., 2020). A cardiologist experienced in reading athletes’ ECG should be consulted to differentiate between ECG changes due to exercise adaptation and ECG abnormalities suggestive of cardiac disease. This is necessary because 12-lead ECG is not the gold standard for the detection of myocarditis. It is also recommended to use cardiac biomarkers to detect myocarditis (Verwoert et al., 2020; Wilson et al., 2020). However, caution should be taken when using this strategy because most people do not have previously documented baseline measurements to compare with, and exercise might elevate the levels of these biomarkers, without clear-cut clinical implications (Verwoert et al., 2020). RT may be done after myocarditis if serum biomarkers of myocardial injury and left ventricular systolic function are normal and if 24 h ECG monitoring or exercise testing rules out relevant arrhythmias (Barker-Davies et al., 2020).
It is worthy to note that most of these screening recommendations refer to competitive athletes and high intense activities (Dores and Cardim, 2020; Verwoert et al., 2020; Wilson et al., 2020). Therefore, the specific limitations for performing RT should be individually analyzed and consider the specificities of each protocol. In this context, RT might be designed to be especially safe for people who have been diagnosed with COVID-19, in different stages of disease and recovery, by decreasing the risk of immunosuppression and reducing respiratory stress and cardiovascular risk. Interestingly, when combining the evidence in immune, pulmonary, and cardiovascular systems, the use of low volume/duration approaches and the manipulation of training variables (moderate to high loads, short set duration, low number of sets, exercise choice, high rest intervals, and/or intra-set rest) might be particularly safe (Figure 2). RT might be also convenient as it can be performed with different implements (traditional machines, elastic devices, body weight exercises, or with no external load) and settings (in-hospital, exercise facilities, or home based), increasing its feasibility.
FIGURE 2
Finally, RT as an approach of the rehabilitation treatment should be individualized according to the patient’s need, taking into consideration their comorbidities, symptoms of dyspnea, and psychological distress.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
PG and DS: conceptualization and writing the first draft. PG, CL, VC, WB, PV, RR-C, WM, and DS: writing, review, and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
PG received a research grant from CNPq (304435/2018-0).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The handling editor declared a past co-authorship with one of the authors PG.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2021.637590/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AboodardaS. J.GeorgeJ.MokhtarA. H.ThompsonM. (2011). Muscle strength and damage following two modes of variable resistance training.J. Sport. Sci. Med.10635–642.
2
AboodardaS. J.PageP. A.BehmD. G. (2016). Muscle activation comparisons between elastic and isoinertial resistance: a meta-analysis.Clin. Biomech.3952–61. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.09.008
3
ACSM. (2009). American college of sports medicine position stand. progression models in resistance training for healthy adults.Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc.41687–708. 10.1249/mss.0b013e3181915670
4
AdamsJ.HubbardM.McCullough-ShockT.SimmsK.ChengD.HartmanJ.et al (2010). Myocardial work during endurance training and resistance training: a daily comparison, from workout session 1 through completion of cardiac rehabilitation.Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)23126–129. 10.1080/08998280.2010.11928599
5
Albesa-AlbiolL.Serra-PayáN.Garnacho-CastañoM. A.CanoL. G.CoboE. P.Maté-MuñozJ. L.et al (2019). Ventilatory efficiency during constant-load test at lactate threshold intensity: endurance versus resistance exercises.PLoS One14:e0216824. 10.1371/journal.pone.0216824
6
AlonsoJ. M.EdouardP.FischettoG.AdamsB.DepiesseF.MountjoyM. (2012). Determination of future prevention strategies in elite track and field: analysis of Daegu 2011 IAAF Championships injuries and illnesses surveillance.Br. J. Sports Med.46505–514. 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091008
7
AlonsoJ. M.TschollP. M.EngebretsenL.MountjoyM.DvorakJ.JungeA. (2010). Occurrence of injuries and illnesses during the 2009 IAAF world athletics championships.Br. J. Sports Med.441100–1105. 10.1136/bjsm.2010.078030
8
AlvesR. R.VieiraC. A.BottaroM.de AraújoM. A. S.SouzaD. C.GomesB. C.et al (2020). NO LOAD” resistance training promotes high levels of knee extensor muscles activation—a pilot study.Diagnostics10:526. 10.3390/diagnostics10080526
9
AndradeA.de Azevedo Klumb SteffensR.SieczkowskaS. M.Peyré TartarugaL. A.Torres VilarinoG. (2018). A systematic review of the effects of strength training in patients with fibromyalgia: clinical outcomes and design considerations.Adv. Rheumatol.58:36.
10
AssunçãoA. R.BottaroM.Ferreira-JuniorJ. B.IzquierdoM.CadoreE. L.GentilP. (2016). The chronic effects of low- and high-intensity resistance training on muscular fitness in adolescents.PLoS One11:e0160650. 10.1371/journal.pone.0160650
11
BarbalhoM.CoswigV. S.BottaroM.De LiraC. A. B.CamposM. H.VieiraC. A.et al (2019). “nO LOAD” resistance training increases functional capacity and muscle size in hospitalized female patients: a pilot study.Eur. J. Transl. Myol.29302–306.
12
BarbalhoM.CoswigV.SouzaD.SerrãoJ. C.CamposM. H.GentilP. (2020a). Back squat vs. hip thrust resistance-training programs in well-trained women.Int. J. Sports Med.41306–310. 10.1055/a-1082-1126
13
BarbalhoM.SouzaD.CoswigV.SteeleJ.FisherJ.AbrahinO.et al (2020b). The effects of resistance exercise selection on muscle size and strength in trained women.Int. J. Sports Med.10.1055/a-1121-7736 Online ahead of print.
14
Barker-DaviesR. M.O’SullivanO.SenaratneK. P. P.BakerP.CranleyM.Dharm-DattaS.et al (2020). The stanford hall consensus statement for post-COVID-19 rehabilitation.Br. J. Sports Med.54949–959. 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102596
15
BhatiP.MoizJ. A.MenonG. R.HussainM. E. (2019). Does resistance training modulate cardiac autonomic control? a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin. Auton. Res.2975–103. 10.1007/s10286-018-0558-3
16
BoneA. E.HepgulN.KonS.MaddocksM. (2017). Sarcopenia and frailty in chronic respiratory disease: lessons from gerontology.Chron. Respir. Dis.1485–99. 10.1177/1479972316679664
17
BottaroM.MachadoS. N.NogueiraW.ScalesR.VelosoJ. (2007). Effect of high versus low-velocity resistance training on muscular fitness and functional performance in older men.Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.99257–264. 10.1007/s00421-006-0343-1
18
BoukeliaB.FogartyM. C.DavisonR. C. R.Florida-JamesG. D. (2017). Diurnal physiological and immunological responses to a 10-km run in highly trained athletes in an environmentally controlled condition of 6°C.Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.1171–6. 10.1007/s00421-016-3489-5
19
BoukeliaB.GomesE. C.Florida-JamesG. D. (2018). Diurnal variation in physiological and immune responses to endurance sport in highly trained runners in a hot and humid environment.Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev.2018:3402143.
20
BuitragoS.WirtzN.FlenkerU.KleinöderH. (2014). Physiological and metabolic responses as function of the mechanical load in resistance exercise.Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab.39345–350. 10.1139/apnm-2013-0214
21
BuitragoS.WirtzN.YueZ.KleinöderH.MesterJ. (2013). Mechanical load and physiological responses of four different resistance training methods in bench press exercise.J. Strength Cond. Res.271091–1100. 10.1519/jsc.0b013e318260ec77
22
CalatayudJ.BorreaniS.ColadoJ. C.MartinF.TellaV.AndersenL. L. (2015). Bench press and push-up at comparable levels of muscle activity results in similar strength gains.J. Strength Cond. Res.29246–253. 10.1519/jsc.0000000000000589
23
CastelliV.CiminiA.FerriC. (2020). Cytokine storm in COVID-19: “when you come out of the storm, you won’t be the same person who walked in.”.Front. Immunol.11:2132.
24
ChanD.CheemaB. S. (2016). Progressive resistance training in end-stage renal disease: systematic review.Am. J. Nephrol.4432–45. 10.1159/000446847
25
ChanK. S.ZhengJ. P.MokY. W.LiY. M.LiuY. N.ChuC. M.et al (2003). SARS: prognosis, outcome and sequelae.Respirology8S36–S40.
26
ChenG.WuD.GuoW.CaoY.HuangD.WangH.et al (2020). Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019.J. Clin. Invest.1302620–2629. 10.1172/jci137244
27
ChupelM. U.DireitoF.FurtadoG. E.MinuzziL. G.PedrosaF. M.ColadoJ. C.et al (2017). Strength training decreases inflammation and increases cognition and physical fitness in older women with cognitive impairment.Front. Physiol.8:377.
28
ColadoJ. C.Garcia-MassoX.PellicerM.AlakhdarY.BenaventJ.Cabeza-RuizR. (2010). A comparison of elastic tubing and isotonic resistance exercises.Int. J. Sports Med.31810–817. 10.1055/s-0030-1262808
29
CountsB. R.BucknerS. L.DankelS. J.JesseeM. B.MattocksK. T.MouserJ. G.et al (2016). The acute and chronic effects of “NO LOAD” resistance training.Physiol. Behav.164345–352. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.06.024
30
da SilvaR. P.NovaesJ.OliveiraR. J.GentilP.WagnerD.BottaroM. (2007). High-velocity resistance exercise protocols in older women?: effects on cardio- vascular response.J. Sport. Sci. Med.6560–567.
31
DavisJ. M.KohutM. L.ColbertL. H.JacksonD. A.GhaffarA.MayerE. P. (1997). Exercise, alveolar macrophage function, and susceptibility to respiratory infection.J. Appl. Physiol.831461–1466. 10.1152/jappl.1997.83.5.1461
32
de BarbalhoM. D. S.GentilP.IzquierdoM.FisherJ.SteeleJ.RaiolR.et al (2017). There are no no-responders to low or high resistance training volumes among older women.Exp. Gerontol.9918–26. 10.1016/j.exger.2017.09.003
33
de FrançaH. S.BrancoP. A. N.Guedes JuniorD. P.GentilP.SteeleJ.TeixeiraC. V. L. S. (2015). The effects of adding single-joint exercises to a multi-joint exercise resistance training program on upper body muscle strength and size in trained men.Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab.826:150409143403004.
34
DenehyL.ElliottD. (2012). Strategies for post ICU rehabilitation.Curr. Opin. Crit. Care18503–508. 10.1097/mcc.0b013e328357f064
35
DiasR. K. N.PennaE. M.NoronhaA. S. N.de AzevedoA. B. C.BarbalhoM.GentilP. V.et al (2020). Cluster-sets resistance training induce similar functional and strength improvements than the traditional method in postmenopausal and elderly women.Exp. Gerontol.138:111011. 10.1016/j.exger.2020.111011
36
DoresH.CardimN. (2020). Return to play after COVID-19: a sport cardiologist’s view.Br. J. Sports Med.541132–1133. 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102482
37
DornelesG. P.dos PassosA. A. Z.RomãoP. R. T.PeresA. (2020). New insights about regulatory t cells distribution and function with exercise: the role of immunometabolism.Curr. Pharm. Des.26979–990. 10.2174/1381612826666200305125210
38
EggmannS.VerraM. L.LuderG.TakalaJ.JakobS. M. (2018). Effects of early, combined endurance and resistance training in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a randomised controlled trial.PLoS One13:e0207428. 10.1371/journal.pone.0207428
39
FarinattiP. T. V.Castinheiras NetA. G. (2011). The effect of between-set rest intervals on the oxygen uptake during and after resistance exercise sessions performed with large-and small-muscle mass.J. Strength Cond. Res.253181–3190. 10.1519/jsc.0b013e318212e415
40
FerreiraT. L.RibeiroH. S.RibeiroA. L. A.Bonini-RochaA. C.LucenaJ. M. S.de OliveiraP. A.et al (2020). Exercise interventions improve depression and anxiety in chronic kidney disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int. Urol. Nephrol.10.1007/s11255-020-02612-w Online ahead of print.
41
FisherJ. P.SteeleJ.GentilP.GiessingJ.WestcottW. L. (2017). A minimal dose approach to resistance training for the older adult; the prophylactic for aging.Exp. Gerontol.9980–86. 10.1016/j.exger.2017.09.012
42
FisherJ.SteeleJ.SmithD. (2017). High- and low-load resistance training: interpretation and practical application of current research findings.Sport. Med.47393–400. 10.1007/s40279-016-0602-1
43
FisherJ.SteeleJ.McKinnonP.McKinnonS. (2014). Strength gains as a result of brief, infrequent resistance exercise in older adults.J. Sport. Med.2014:731890.
44
FragalaM. S.CadoreE. L.DorgoS.IzquierdoM.KraemerW. J.PetersonM. D.et al (2019). Resistance training for older adults: position statement from the national strength and conditioning association.J. Strength Cond. Res.332019–2052. 10.1519/jsc.0000000000003230
45
FreidenreichD. J.VolekJ. S. (2012). Immune responses to resistance exercise.Exerc. Immunol. Rev.188–41.
46
Garnacho-CastañoM. V.Albesa-AlbiolL.Serra-PayáN.Gomis BatallerM.Pleguezuelos CoboE.Guirao CanoL.et al (2018). Oxygen uptake slow component and the efficiency of resistance exercises.J. Strength Cond. Res.10.1519/JSC.0000000000002905 Online ahead of print.
47
Garnacho-CastañoM. V.DominguezR.Maté-MuñozJ. L. (2015). Understanding the meaning of lactate threshold in resistance exercises.Int. J. Sports Med.36371–377. 10.1055/s-0034-1398495
48
GentilP.BottaroM.NollM.WernerS.VasconcelosJ. C.SeffrinA.et al (2017a). Muscle activation during resistance training with no external load - effects of training status, movement velocity, dominance, and visual feedback.Physiol. Behav.179148–152. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.06.004
49
GentilP.de LiraC. A. B.SouzaD.JimenezA.MayoX.de Fátima Pinhoet al (2020a). Resistance training safety during and after the SARS-Cov-2 outbreak: practical recommendations.Biomed Res. Int.2020:3292916.
50
GentilP.FisherJ.SteeleJ. (2017b). A review of the acute effects and long-term adaptations of single- and multi-joint exercises during resistance training.Sport Med.47843–855. 10.1007/s40279-016-0627-5
51
GentilP.Ramirez-CampilloR.SouzaD. C. (2020b). Resistance training in face of the coronavirus outbreak: time to think outside the box.Front. Physiol.11:859.
52
GentilP.SoaresS. R.PereiraM. C.CunhaR. R.MartorelliS. S.MartorelliA. S.et al (2013). Effect of adding single-joint exercises to a multi-joint exercise resistance-training program on strength and hypertrophy in untrained subjects.Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab.38341–344. 10.1139/apnm-2012-0176
53
GentilP.SoaresS.BottaroM. (2015). Single vs. multi-joint resistance exercises: effects on muscle strength and hypertrophy.Asian J. Sport. Med.6:e24057.
54
GerthA. M. J.HatchR. A.YoungJ. D.WatkinsonP. J. (2019). Changes in health-related quality of life after discharge from an intensive care unit: a systematic review.Anaesthesia74100–108. 10.1111/anae.14444
55
GjøvaagT. F.MirtaheriP.SimonK.BerdalG.TuchelI.WestlieT.et al (2016). Hemodynamic responses to resistance exercise in patients with coronary artery disease.Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.48581–588. 10.1249/mss.0000000000000811
56
GladstoneD. E.KimB. S.MooneyK.KarabaA. H.D’AlessioF. R. (2020). Regulatory T cells for treating patients with COVID-19 and acute respiratory distress syndrome: two case reports.Ann. Intern. Med.173852–853. 10.7326/l20-0681
57
GleesonM.BishopN.OliveiraM.TaulerP. (2013). Influence of training load on upper respiratory tract infection incidence and antigen-stimulated cytokine production.Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports23451–457. 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01422.x
58
GordonB. R.McDowellC. P.HallgrenM.MeyerJ. D.LyonsM.HerringM. P. (2018). Association of efficacy of resistance exercise training with depressive symptoms meta-analysis and meta-regression: analysis of randomized clinical trials.JAMA Psychiatry75566–576. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0572
59
GordonB. R.McDowellC. P.LyonsM.HerringM. P. (2017). The effects of resistance exercise training on anxiety: a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis of randomized controlled trials.Sports Med.472521–2532. 10.1007/s40279-017-0769-0
60
GoshuaG.PineA. B.MeizlishM. L.ChangC.-H.ZhangH.BahelP.et al (2020). Endotheliopathy in COVID-19-associated coagulopathy: evidence from a single-centre, cross-sectional study.Lancet Haematol.7e575–e582.
61
GotshallR.GootmanJ.ByrnesW.FleckS.ValovichT. (1999). Noninvasive characterization of the blood pressure response to double–leg press exercise.JEPonline2, 1–6.
62
HaddockB. L.WilkinL. D. (2006). Resistance training volume and post exercise energy expenditure.Int. J. Sports Med.27143–148. 10.1055/s-2005-865601
63
HayesL. D.BickerstaffG. F.BakerJ. S. (2010). Interactions of cortisol, testosterone, and resistance training: influence of circadian rhythms.Chronobiol. Int.27675–705. 10.3109/07420521003778773
64
HerridgeM. S.CheungA. M.TanseyC. M.Matte-MartynA.Diaz-GranadosN.Al-SaidiF.et al (2003). One-year outcomes in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome.N. Engl. J. Med.348683–693.
65
HornP. L.PyneD. B.HopkinsW. G.BarnesC. J. (2010). Lower white blood cell counts in elite athletes training for highly aerobic sports.Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.110925–932. 10.1007/s00421-010-1573-9
66
Houchen-WolloffL.SandlandC. J.HarrisonS. L.MenonM. K.MorganM. D.SteinerM. C.et al (2014). Ventilatory requirements of quadriceps resistance training in people with COPD and healthy controls.Int. J. Copd9589–595. 10.2147/copd.s59164
67
HuiD. S.WongK. T.KoF. W.TamL. S.ChanD. P.WooJ.et al (2005). The 1-year impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome on pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in a cohort of survivors.Chest1282247–2261. 10.1378/chest.128.4.2247
68
JacksonJ. C.ElyE. W.MoreyM. C.AndersonV. M.DenneL. B.CluneJ.et al (2012). Cognitive and physical rehabilitation of intensive care unit survivors: results of the return randomized controlled pilot investigation.Crit. Care Med.401088–1097. 10.1097/ccm.0b013e3182373115
69
JonesH.AtkinsonG.LearyA.GeorgeK.MurphyM.WaterhouseJ. (2006). Reactivity of ambulatory blood pressure to physical activity varies with time of day.Hypertension47778–784. 10.1161/01.hyp.0000206421.09642.b5
70
JonesH.PritchardC.GeorgeK.EdwardsB.AtkinsonG. (2008). The acute post-exercise response of blood pressure varies with time of day.Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.104481–489. 10.1007/s00421-008-0797-4
71
JoséA.Dal CorsoS. (2016). Inpatient rehabilitation improves functional capacity, peripheral muscle strength and quality of life in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a randomised trial.J. Physiother.6296–102. 10.1016/j.jphys.2016.02.014
72
KarlsdottirA. E.FosterC.PorcariJ. P.Palmer-McLeanK.White-KubeR.BackesR. C. (2002). Hemodynamic responses during aerobic and resistance exercise.J. Cardiopulm. Rehabil.22170–177. 10.1097/00008483-200205000-00008
73
KhatoonF.PrasadK.KumarV. (2020). Neurological manifestations of COVID-19: available evidences and a new paradigm.J. Neurovirol.10.1007/s13365-020-00895-4 Online ahead of print.
74
KikuchiN.NakazatoK. (2017). Low-load bench press and push-up induce similar muscle hypertrophy and strength gain.J. Exerc. Sci. Fit.1537–42. 10.1016/j.jesf.2017.06.003
75
KnuimanP.HopmanM. T. E.MensinkM. (2015). Glycogen availability and skeletal muscle adaptations with endurance and resistance exercise.Nutr. Metab.12:59.
76
KochiA. N.TagliariA. P.ForleoG. B.FassiniG. M.TondoC. (2020). Cardiac and arrhythmic complications in patients with COVID-19.J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.311003–1008. 10.1111/jce.14479
77
KovacevicA.MavrosY.HeiszJ. J.Fiatarone SinghM. A. (2018). The effect of resistance exercise on sleep: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Sleep Med. Rev.3952–68. 10.1016/j.smrv.2017.07.002
78
KraemerW. J.AdamsK.CafarelliE.DudleyG. A.DoolyC.FeigenbaumM. S.et al (2002). American college of sports medicine position stand. progression models in resistance training for healthy adults.Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc.34364–380. 10.1097/00005768-200202000-00027
79
KraemerW. J.MarchitelliL.GordonS. E.HarmanE.DziadosJ. E.MelloR.et al (1990). Hormonal and growth factor responses to heavy resistance exercise protocols.J. Appl. Physiol.691442–1450. 10.1152/jappl.1990.69.4.1442
80
KreutzR.AlgharablyE. A. E. H.AziziM.DobrowolskiP.GuzikT.JanuszewiczA.et al (2020). Hypertension, the renin-angiotensin system, and the risk of lower respiratory tract infections and lung injury: implications for covid-19.Cardiovasc. Res.1161688–1699. 10.1093/cvr/cvaa097
81
KrügerK.AgnischockS.LechtermannA.TiwariS.MishraM.PilatC.et al (2011). Intensive resistance exercise induces lymphocyte apoptosis via cortisol and glucocorticoid receptor-dependent pathways.J. Appl. Physiol.1101226–1232. 10.1152/japplphysiol.01295.2010
82
LammersM. D.AnéliN. M.de OliveiraG. G.de Oliveira MacielS. F. V.ZaniniD.MânicaA.et al (2020). The anti-inflammatory effect of resistance training in hypertensive women.J. Hypertens.382490–2500. 10.1097/hjh.0000000000002578
83
LamotteM.FleuryF.PirardM.JamonA.van de BorneP. (2010). Acute cardiovascular response to resistance training during cardiac rehabilitation: effect of repetition speed and rest periods.Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol.17329–336. 10.1097/hjr.0b013e328332efdd
84
LamotteM.NisetG.van de BorneP. (2005). The effect of different intensity modalities of resistance training on beat-to-beat blood pressure in cardiac patients.Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Prev. Rehabil.1212–17. 10.1097/00149831-200502000-00003
85
LevingerI.BronksR.CodyD. V.LintonI.DavieA. (2005). Resistance training for chronic heart failure patients on beta blocker medications.Int. J. Cardiol.102493–499. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.05.061
86
LiN.LiP.LuY.WangZ.LiJ.LiuX.et al (2019). Effects of resistance training on exercise capacity in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Aging Clin. Exp. Res.321911–1922. 10.1007/s40520-019-01339-8
87
LiY. C.BaiW. Z.HashikawaT. (2020). The neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV2 may play a role in the respiratory failure of COVID-19 patients.J. Med. Virol.92552–555. 10.1002/jmv.25728
88
LiZ.CaiY.ZhangQ.ZhangP.SunR.JiangH.et al (2020). Intensive care unit acquired weakness.Medicine99:e21926.
89
LiaoW. H.ChenJ. W.ChenX.LinL.YanH. Y.ZhouY. Q.et al (2015). Impact of resistance training in subjects with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Respir. Care601130–1145. 10.4187/respcare.03598
90
MacDougallJ. D.McKelvieR. S.MorozD. E.SaleD. G.McCartneyN.BuickF. (1992). Factors affecting blood pressure during heavy weight lifting and static contractions.J. Appl. Physiol.731590–1597. 10.1152/jappl.1992.73.4.1590
91
MadjidM.Safavi-NaeiniP.SolomonS. D.VardenyO. (2020). Potential effects of coronaviruses on the cardiovascular system: a review.JAMA Cardiol.5831–840. 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1286
92
MarillierM.BernardA. C.VergèsS.NederJ. A. (2020). Locomotor muscles in COPD: the rationale for rehabilitative exercise training.Front. Physiol.10:1590.
93
Martínez-VelillaN.Casas-HerreroA.Zambom-FerraresiF.Sáez, de AsteasuM. L.LuciaA.et al (2019). Effect of exercise intervention on functional decline in very elderly patients during acute hospitalization.JAMA Intern. Med.17928–36. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4869
94
MartinsW. R.de OliveiraR. J.CarvalhoR. S.de Oliveira DamascenoV.da SilvaV. Z. M.SilvaM. S. (2013). Elastic resistance training to increase muscle strength in elderly: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr.578–15. 10.1016/j.archger.2013.03.002
95
MazzettiS.WolffC.YocumA.ReidyP.DouglassM.CochranM. (2011). Effect of maximal and slow versus recreational muscle contractions on energy expenditure in trained and untrained men.J. Sport Med. Phys. Fit.51381–392.
96
McCartneyN. (1998). Role of resistance training in heart disease.Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.30S396–S402.
97
McDonaghM. J.DaviesC. T. (1984). Adaptive response of mammalian skeletal muscle to exercise with high loads.Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol.52139–155. 10.1007/bf00433384
98
McKelvieR. S.McCartneyN. (1990). Weightlifting training in cardiac patients: considerations.Sport Med.10355–364. 10.2165/00007256-199010060-00003
99
McKelvieR. S.McCartneyN.TomlinsonC.BauerR.MacDougallJ. D. (1995). Comparison of hemodynamic responses to cycling and resistance exercise in congestive heart failure secondary to ischemic cardiomyopathy.Am. J. Cardiol.76977–979. 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80277-x
100
MilesM. P.KraemerW. J.NindlB. C.GroveD. S.LeachS. K.DohiK.et al (2003). Strength, workload, anaerobic intensity and the immune response to resistance exercise in women.Acta Physiol. Scand.178155–163. 10.1046/j.1365-201x.2003.01124.x
101
MitchellC. J.Churchward-VenneT. A.WestD. W. D.BurdN. A.BreenL.BakerS. K.et al (2012). Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men.J. Appl. Physiol.11371–77. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00307.2012
102
MookerjeeS.WelikonichM. J.RatamessN. A. (2016). Comparison of energy expenditure during single-set vs. multiple-set resistance exercise.J. Strength Cond. Res.301447–1452.
103
MorrisP. E.BerryM. J.FilesD. C.ThompsonJ. C.HauserJ.FloresL.et al (2016). Standardized rehabilitation and hospital length of stay among patients with acute respiratory failure a randomized clinical trial.J. Am. Med. Assoc.3152694–2702.
104
MortonR. W.OikawaS. Y.WavellC. G.MazaraN.McGloryC.QuadrilateroJ.et al (2016). Neither load nor systemic hormones determine resistance training-mediated hypertrophy or strength gains in resistance-trained young men.J. Appl. Physiol.121129–138.
105
MukaimotoT.OhnoM. (2012). Effects of circuit low-intensity resistance exercise with slow movement on oxygen consumption during and after exercise.J. Sports Sci.3079–90.
106
NataleV. M.BrennerI. K.MoldoveanuA. I.VasiliouP.ShekP.ShepardR. J. (2003). Effects of three different types of exercise on blood leukocyte count during and following exercise.Sao Paulo Med. J.1219–14.
107
NiemanD. C. (2007). Marathon training and immune function.Sports Med.37412–415.
108
NiemanD. C.WentzL. M. (2019). The compelling link between physical activity and the body’s defense system.J. Sport Heal. Sci.8201–217.
109
NogueiraW.GentilP.MelloS. N. M.OliveiraR. J.BezerraA. J. C.BottaroM. (2009). Effects of power training on muscle thickness of older men.Int. J. Sport Med.30200–204.
110
OeyenS. G.VandijckD. M.BenoitD. D.AnnemansL.DecruyenaereJ. M. (2010). Quality of life after intensive care: a systematic review of the literature.Crit. Care Med.382386–2400.
111
OngK. C.NgA. W. K.LeeL. S. U.KawG.KwekS. K.LeowM. K. S.et al (2005). 1-Year pulmonary function and health status in survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome.Chest1281393–1400.
112
OsthoffA. K. R.TaeymansJ.KoolJ.MarcarV.Van GestelA. J. R. (2013). Association between peripheral muscle strength and daily physical activity in patients with COPD: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.J. Cardiopulm. Rehabil. Prev.33351–359.
113
PalmerC. S.OstrowskiM.BaldersonB.ChristianN.CroweS. M. (2015). Glucose metabolism regulates T cell activation, differentiation, and functions.Front. Immunol.6:1.
114
PaoliA.GentilP.MoroT.MarcolinG.BiancoA. (2017). Resistance training with single vs. multi-joint exercises at equal total load volume: effects on body composition, cardiorespiratory fitness, and muscle strength.Front. Physiol.8:1105.
115
PeakeJ. M.NeubauerO.WalshN. P.SimpsonR. J. (2017). Recovery of the immune system after exercise.J. Appl. Physiol.1221077–1087.
116
PedersenB. K.Hoffman-GoetzL. (2000). Exercise and the immune system: regulation, integration, and adaptation.Physiol. Rev.801055–1081.
117
PedersenB. K.RohdeT.OstrowskiK. (1998). Recovery of the immune system after exercise.Acta Physiol. Scand.162325–332.
118
PellicciaA.SolbergE. E.PapadakisM.AdamiP. E.BiffiA.CaselliS.et al (2019). Recommendations for participation in competitive and leisure time sport in athletes with cardiomyopathies, myocarditis, and pericarditis: position statement of the sport cardiology section of the european association of preventive cardiology (EAPC).Eur. Heart J.4019–33.
119
PetersE. M.BatemanE. D. (1983). Ultramarathon running and upper respiratory tract infections. an epidemiological survey.S. Afr. Med. J.64582–584.
120
PhelanD.KimJ. H.ChungE. H. (2020). A game plan for the resumption of sport and exercise after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection.JAMA Cardiol.51085–1086.
121
RamaL.TeixeiraA. M.MatosA.BorgesG.HenriquesA.GleesonM.et al (2013). Changes in natural killer cell subpopulations over a winter training season in elite swimmers.Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.113859–868.
122
RamelA.WagnerK. H.ElmadfaI. (2003). Acute impact of submaximal resistance exercise on immunological and hormonal parameters in young men.J. Sports Sci.211001–1008.
123
Ramírez-CampilloR.CastilloA.de la FuenteC. I.Campos-JaraC.AndradeD. C.ÁlvarezC.et al (2014). High-speed resistance training is more effective than low-speed resistance training to increase functional capacity and muscle performance in older women.Exp. Gerontol.5851–57.
124
RatamessN. A.FalvoM. J.MangineG. T.HoffmanJ. R.FaigenbaumA. D.KangJ. (2007). The effect of rest interval length on metabolic responses to the bench press exercise.Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.1001–17.
125
RatamessN. A.RosenbergJ. G.KangJ.SundbergS.IzerK. A.LevowskyJ.et al (2014). Acute oxygen uptake and resistance exercise performance using different rest interval lengths: the influence of maximal aerobic capacity and exercise sequence.J. Strength Cond. Res.281875–1888.
126
RiceH.HarroldM.FowlerR.WatsonC.WatererG.HillK. (2020). Exercise training for adults hospitalized with an acute respiratory condition: a systematic scoping review.Clin. Rehabil.3445–55.
127
Rúa-AlonsoM.MayoX.MotaJ.KingsleyJ. D.Iglesias-SolerE. (2020). A short set configuration attenuates the cardiac parasympathetic withdrawal after a whole-body resistance training session.Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.1201905–1919.
128
SantiagoL.ǍngeloM.NetoL. G. L.PereiraG. B.LeiteR. D.MostardaC. T.et al (2018). Effects of resistance training on immunoinflammatory response, TNF-alpha gene expression, and body composition in elderly women.J. Aging Res.2018:1467025.
129
SchellhornP.KlingelK.BurgstahlerC. (2020). Return to sports after COVID-19 infection.Eur. Heart J.414382–4384.
130
ScottC. B.LeightonB. H.AhearnK. J.McManusJ. J. (2011). Aerobic, anaerobic, and excess postexercise oxygen consumption energy expenditure of muscular endurance and strength: 1-set of bench press to muscular fatigue.J. Strength Cond. Res.25903–908.
131
SeguroC.VianaR.LimaG.GalvãoL.SilvaL.JardimT.et al (2019). Improvements in health parameters of a diabetic and hypertensive patient with only 40 minutes of exercise per week: a case study.Disabil. Rehabil.423119–3125.
132
SiedlikJ. A.BenedictS. H.LandesE. J.WeirJ. P.VardimanJ. P.GallagherP. M. (2016). Acute bouts of exercise induce a suppressive effect on lymphocyte proliferation in human subjects: a meta-analysis.Brain. Behav. Immun.56343–351.
133
SmiliosI.PilianidisT.KaramouzisM.TokmakidisS. P. (2003). Hormonal responses after various resistance exercise protocols.Med. Sci. Sport Exerc.35644–654.
134
SmiliosI.PilianidisT.KaramouzisM.ParlavantzasA.TokmakidisS. P. (2007). Hormonal responses after a strength endurance resistance exercise protocol in young and elderly males.Int. J. Sports Med.28401–406.
135
SoR. C. H.KoJ.YuanY. W. Y.LamJ. J.LouieL. (2004). Severe acute respiratory syndrome and sport: facts and fallacies.Sport Med.341023–1033.
136
SosnowskiK.LinF.MitchellM. L.WhiteH. (2015). Early rehabilitation in the intensive care unit: an integrative literature review.Aust. Crit. Care28216–225.
137
SouzaD.BarbalhoM.GentilP. (2020). The role of resistance training volume on muscle size and lean body mass: to infinity and beyond?Hum. Mov.2118–29.
138
SouzaD.BarbalhoM.VieiraC. A.MartinsW. R.CadoreE. L.GentilP. (2019). Minimal dose resistance training with elastic tubes promotes functional and cardiovascular benefits to older women.Exp. Gerontol.115132–138.
139
SouzaP. S.GonçalvesE. D.PedrosoG. S.FariasH. R.JunqueiraS. C.MarconR.et al (2017). Physical exercise attenuates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by inhibiting peripheral immune response and blood-brain barrier disruption.Mol. Neurobiol.544723–4737.
140
SpenceL.BrownW. J.PyneD. B.NissenM. D.SlootsT. P.MccormackJ. G.et al (2007). Incidence, etiology, and symptomatology of upper respiratory illness in elite athletes.Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.39577–586.
141
SpruitM. A.JanssenD. J. A.FranssenF. M. E.WoutersE. F. M. (2009). Rehabilitation and palliative care in lung fibrosis.Respirology14781–787.
142
SteardoL.SteardoL.VerkhratskyA. (2020). Psychiatric face of COVID-19.Transl. Psychiatry10:261.
143
SteeleJ.Androulakis-KorakakisP.PerrinC.FisherJ. P.GentilP.ScottC.et al (2019). Comparisons of resistance training and ‘cardio’ exercise modalities as countermeasures to microgravity induced physical deconditioning: new perspectives and lessons learned from terrestrial studies.Front. Physiol.10:1150.
144
SteinerM. C. (2007). Sarcopaenia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Thorax62101–103.
145
Stephen-VictorE.DasM.KarnamA.PitardB.GautierJ. F.BayryJ. (2020). Potential of regulatory T-cell-based therapies in the management of severe COVID-19.Eur. Respir. J.56:2002182.
146
SwallowE. B.ReyesD.HopkinsonN. S.ManW. D. C.PorcherR.CettiE. J.et al (2007). Quadriceps strength predicts mortality in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Thorax62115–120.
147
TakahashiA.AbeK.UsamiK.ImaizumiH.HayashiM.OkaiK.et al (2015). Simple resistance exercise helps patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.Int. J. Sports Med.36848–852.
148
TakahashiA.ImaizumiH.HayashiM.OkaiK.AbeK.UsamiK.et al (2017). Simple resistance exercise for 24 weeks decreases alanine aminotransferase levels in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.Sport Med. Int. Open01E2–E7.
149
TanseyC. M.LouieM.LoebM.GoldW. L.MullerM. P.De JagerJ. A.et al (2007). One-year outcomes and health care utilization in survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome.Arch. Intern. Med.1671312–1320.
150
TimpkaT.JacobssonJ.BargoriaV.PériardJ. D.RacinaisS.RonsenO.et al (2017). Preparticipation predictors for championship injury and illness: cohort study at the Beijing 2015 international association of athletics federations world championships.Br. J. Sports Med.51272–277.
151
TroostersT.ProbstV. S.CrulT.PittaF.Gayan-RamirezG.DecramerM.et al (2010). Resistance training prevents deterioration in quadriceps muscle function during acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.1811072–1077.
152
TroyerE. A.KohnJ. N.HongS. (2020). Are we facing a crashing wave of neuropsychiatric sequelae of COVID-19? neuropsychiatric symptoms and potential immunologic mechanisms.Brain Behav. Immun.8734–39.
153
TsuzukuS.KajiokaT.SakakibaraH.ShimaokaK. (2017). Slow movement resistance training using body weight improves muscle mass in the elderly: a randomized controlled trial.Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports281339–1344.
154
ValeA. F.CarneiroJ. A.JardimP. C. V.JardimT. V.SteeleJ.FisherJ. P.et al (2018). Acute effects of different resistance training loads on cardiac autonomic modulation in hypertensive postmenopausal women.J. Transl. Med.16:240.
155
VeldemaJ.BöslK.KuglerP.PonfickM.GdyniaH. J.NowakD. A. (2019). Cycle ergometer training vs resistance training in ICU-acquired weakness.Acta Neurol. Scand.14062–71.
156
VerrillD.ShoupE.McElveenG.WittK.BergeyD. (1992). Resistive exercise training in cardiac patients: recommendations.Sport Med.13171–193.
157
VerwoertG. C.de VriesS. T.BijsterveldN.WillemsA. R.vd BorghR.JongmanJ. K.et al (2020). Return to sports after COVID-19: a position paper from the dutch sports cardiology section of the netherlands society of cardiology.Neth. Heart. J.28391–395.
158
VincentK. R.VincentH. K. (2012). Resistance exercise for knee osteoarthritis.PM R4S45–S52.
159
VindegaardN.Eriksen BenrosM. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and mental health consequences: systematic review of the current evidence.Brain Behav. Immun.89531–542.
160
WangD.HuB.HuC.ZhuF.LiuX.ZhangJ.et al (2020). Clinical Characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in wuhan, China.J. Am. Med. Assoc.3231061–1069.
161
WilsonM. G.HullJ. H.RogersJ.PollockN.DoddM.HainesJ.et al (2020). Cardiorespiratory considerations for return-to-play in elite athletes after COVID-19 infection: a practical guide for sport and exercise medicine physicians.Br. J. Sports Med.541157–1161.
162
WuY. C.ChenC. S.ChanY. J. (2020). The outbreak of COVID-19: an overview.J. Chin. Med. Assoc.83217–220.
163
YamamotoS.HottaK.OtaE.MoriR.MatsunagaA. (2016). Effects of resistance training on muscle strength, exercise capacity, and mobility in middle-aged and elderly patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.J. Cardiol.68125–134.
164
ZhangC.WuZ.LiJ. W.TanK.YangW.ZhaoH.et al (2020). Discharge may not be the end of treatment: pay attention to pulmonary fibrosis caused by severe COVID-19.J. Med. Virol.931378–1386.
165
ZuZ. Y.JiangM.Di, XuP. P.ChenW.NiQ. Q.et al (2020). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a perspective from China.Radiology296E15–E25.
Summary
Keywords
resistance exercise, rehabilitation, strength training, pulmonary rehabilitation, cardiac rehabilitation, coronavirus
Citation
Gentil P, de Lira CAB, Coswig V, Barroso WKS, Vitorino PVO, Ramirez-Campillo R, Martins W and Souza D (2021) Practical Recommendations Relevant to the Use of Resistance Training for COVID-19 Survivors. Front. Physiol. 12:637590. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.637590
Received
03 December 2020
Accepted
26 January 2021
Published
03 March 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Robinson Ramírez-Vélez, Public University of Navarre, Spain
Reviewed by
Hamid Arazi, University of Guilan, Iran; Patrik Drid, University of Novi Sad, Serbia; José Francisco López-Gil, University of Murcia, Spain
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Gentil, de Lira, Coswig, Barroso, Vitorino, Ramirez-Campillo, Martins and Souza.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Paulo Gentil, paulogentil@hotmail.com
This article was submitted to Exercise Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.