Feifei Liu1,2,3,4,5†
Qi Jiang1,2,3,4,5†Xuedong Sun6†Yuzhen Huang1,2,3,4,5Zhenzhen Zhang1,2,3,4,5Ting Han1,2,3,4,5*
Yuhua Shi1,2,3,4,5*- 1Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- 2Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- 3Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, China
- 4Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, China
- 5National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- 6Department of Neurology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan, China
Objectives: To evaluate the effect of dyslipidemia on the incidence of moderate and severe Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in the duration of assisted reproduction technique (ART).
Methods: The study included 233 moderate and severe OHSS patients who received hospitalization after in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles to avoid severe complications. They were divided into dyslipidemia group and normal lipid metabolism group to evaluate whether dyslipidemia contributes to the development of severe OHSS. Subgroup analysis was set to avoid deviation including the freeze-all group and fresh embryo transfer (ET) group according to whether the eligible women chose fresh embryo transfer immediately after their IVF or ICSI cycles. The main outcome measures included the incidence of moderate OHSS and severe OHSS, total gonadotropin dose, number of oocytes retrieved, age and body mass index (BMI). In the ET groups, the rate of pregnancy is also included for analysis.
Results: In the freeze-all group, lipid metabolism was ultimately identified as the factor affecting the morbidity of severe OHSS and the ones with dyslipidemia were more likely to develop to severe OHSS (P < 0.05), while the incidence of severe OHSS among the ET groups had no statistical significance (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: The findings of this study suggested that dyslipidemia might contribute to the development of OHSS, especially for those patients who chose the cryopreservation of all embryos. It is essential to consider the risk of OHSS in patients with dyslipidemia although they required cryopreservation of all embryos.
Introduction
In recent decades, about one in seven couples encounter problems with fertility (European IVF-monitoring programme (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) et al., 2006), and couples increasingly turn to assisted reproductive technology (ART) for help. Complications associated with ART are also becoming more frequent and one of the most serious and common complications during the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) is ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (De Mouzon et al., 2012). Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is an iatrogenic potentially life-threatening condition resulting from excessive ovarian stimulation. Its reported incidence varies from 1 to 10% in the in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles (Forman et al., 1990; Leya et al., 1991; MacDougall et al., 1992). The main symptoms of OHSS contain abdominal discomfort, nausea, vomiting and sometimes diarrhea, ovarian enlargement, oliguria, fever and shortness of breath (Pellicer et al., 1999; Lee et al., 2008; Herr et al., 2013). In addition, OHSS can also cause serious vascular complications. a rare but devastating consequence of OHSS is thromboembolism, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), occurring in veins of limbs and even cause cerebral thrombosis, which may lead to permanent injury or death (Chan and Ginsberg, 2006; Chan, 2009). Nowadays, the pathological mechanism of OHSS remains unclear. Overall related literatures, the major pathophysiological mechanism is an increase in capillary permeability, resulting in a shift of fluid from the intravascular space to the extravascular compartments (Delbaere et al., 2005). In previous studies, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and the cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) have been identified as potential mediators in the development of OHSS because of their vasoactive properties, which increase the permeability of capillaries (Motro et al., 1990; Pellicer et al., 1999; Miller et al., 2016). The damage to vascular wall caused by dyslipidemia, characterized by elevated plasma triglyceride (TG) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels, has been proved by researchers worldwide (Battisti et al., 2003; Jenkins et al., 2004; Urbina et al., 2017), and it has become increasingly accepted that high-cholesterol levels can also adversely affect the microvasculature prior to its inducing of proinflammatory (Padró et al., 2018). But it is still unknown that whether dyslipidemia cause the damage of microvasculature in ovary, the correlation between OHSS and lipid metabolism has rarely been reported and the relative effect of lipid metabolism on OHSS therefore demands further examination. In this article, we analyzed 233 cases with moderate and severe OHSS receiving hospitalization after in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles and compared the degree and results of OHSS occurred in the two groups divided based on the presence or absence of dyslipidemia during ART, aiming to offer some insights on the treatment and prevention of OHSS.
Materials and Methods
Study Design and Population
This retrospective study included 233 patients with moderate or severe OHSS (164 moderate and 69 severe) hospitalized after their IVF or ICSI cycles from June 2013 to June 2015 in the Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University. 91/233 women had embryo transfer and the remaining 142/233 patients underwent a “freeze-all” approach. Data was collected after obtaining approval from the medical ethics committee. The eligible women received their cycles of IVF or ICSI because of tubal factors, male factors, or a combination of both. Tubal factors included unilateral or bilateral tubal occlusion, unilateral or bilateral salpingectomy, or peritubal adhesion. Male factors included oligospermia, asthenospermia, or obstructive azoospermia. Women with diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome [diagnosed by modified Rotterdam criteria (Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group, 2004; Legro et al., 2014)], adenomyosis, endometriosis, or high risks of OHSS were not included. All patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence or absence of dyslipidemia. Amongst these cases, 99 cases have dyslipidemia whilst 134 cases were normal in lipid metabolism. The Chinese guidelines on prevention and treatment of dyslipidemia have defined a high concentration of total cholesterol (TC) as ≥240 mg/dL or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) as ≥160 mg/dL, with or without a low concentration of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) as ≦40 mg/dL, which were defined as dyslipidemia (Joint Committee for Developing Chinese Guidelines on Prevention and Treatment of Dyslipidemia in Adults, 2016).
Diagnosis and Classification of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
In this study, OHSS was diagnosed by the presence of symptoms, signs, and laboratory findings, traditionally classified into mild, moderate, severe and critical, based on OHSS prevention and treatment guideline of American Society for Reproductive Medicine (Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2016). All recruited patients in our study were moderate, severe and critical OHSS suffering from abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, ascites, oliguria or anuria, electrolyte disturbances or abnormal liver function. They received hospitalization after their IVF or ICSI cycles with general treatment of bed test, daily assessment of vital signs. Symptomatic treatment, such as circulatory volume correction, electrolyte replacement, anticoagulant therapy, were given according to their clinical symptoms, ultrasound and laboratory examination results.
Methods
In our center, patients with OHSS risks are given a series of strategies to prevent OHSS. During COH of those patients, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocols are preferred which has been proven to reduce the risk of developing OHSS significantly (Weijie et al., 2015; Toftager et al., 2016). However, the standard long-protocol was used in patients with normal ovarian function in our center and antagonist protocol was given in patients with high ovarian response or other OHSS risks, such as PCOS, to prevent the incidence of OHSS. In our study, all patients received a standardized long-term protocol in mid-luteal phase for ovarian stimulation with Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) to down-regulate the functions of the pituitary gland on Day 21 of the previous menstrual cycle. After down-regulation of the pituitary gland, gonadotropin was initiated with a starting dose of recombinant FSH ranging from 75 to 225 IU, and the dose of gonadotropin was modulated according to the patient’s ovarian response. Ovarian response was monitored by serial trans-vaginal ultrasound and sex hormones assay were detected as well, which were important for the adjustment of the dose of gonadotropin and the timing for triggering of the final oocyte maturation during ovarian stimulation. Urinary human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) at a dose of 4000 to 8000IU was administered to induced oocyte maturation when at least two dominant follicles reached 18–20 mm in diameter and oocyte retrieval was performed 36–48 h later. The choice of fresh embryo transfer or freeze-all embryo for patients is determined by ultrasonography and serum estradiol (E2) level 2 days after oocyte retrieval. If number of oocytes retrieved ≥15, the serum E2 ≥ 5000 pg/ml on hCG trigger day or the serum E2 ≥ 1500 pg/ml on the second day after oocyte retrieval, or OHSS manifestations such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and distension appeared, patients would receive a “freeze-all” approach instead of fresh embryo transfer to prevent late OHSS. The positive result of β-hCG (β-hCG ≥ 10IU/ml) in blood showed the biochemical pregnancy 14 days after transplantation, and clinical pregnancy was defined as the presence of a gestational sac in the uterine cavity at 35 days after embryo transfer, as detected through ultrasonography. According to whether or not patients received fresh embryo transfer, we set subgroups of freeze-all group and fresh embryo transfer group for analysis.
Statistical Analysis
Data analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) statistics 20. Continuous variables of clinical characteristics were displayed as mean ± standard deviation () and compared between the dyslipidemia group and the normal lipid metabolism group by t-test. Qualitative variables were presented as frequency and percentage and compared between these two groups with different types of lipid metabolism by chi-square test. All values of P < 0.05 for two-side tests were considered statistically significant. Among freeze-all groups, to avoid the bias of other characters, such as the total gonadotropin dose and BMI, logistic regression was used to assess the relationships between variables and incidence of severe OHSS. Only variables with P < 0.05 were considered to be related to the morbidity of severe OHSS.
Results
Comparison of Freeze-All Group and Fresh Embryo Transfer (ET) Group
In the ET group, 59 cases represented moderate OHSS (64.8%) and 32 cases developed severe OHSS (35.2%), while there were 105 cases of moderate OHSS (73.9%) and 37 cases of severe OHSS (26.1%) in the freeze-all group (Table 1). It is showed that the incidence of severe OHSS in the ET group was higher than that in the freeze-all group, but the difference between 2 groups had no significance (35.2% vs. 26.1%, P = 0.137). Compared with ET group, the number of oocytes retrieved is significantly higher in the freeze-all group (24.38 ± 9.61 vs. 14.43 ± 5.01, P = 0.000), while the age, total gonadotropin dose and BMI between 2 groups had no statistical significance (P > 0.05).
Table 1. Comparison of freeze-all group and fresh embryo transfer group.
Comparison of Freeze-All Groups With Normal Lipid Metabolism or Dyslipidemia
Among the cases who chose freeze-all embryo in this study (Table 2), there were 66 cases of moderate OHSS (80.5%) and 16 cases of severe OHSS (19.5%) in the group of normal lipid metabolism. However, in the dyslipidemia group, there were 39 cases of moderate OHSS (65.0%) and 21 cases of severe OHSS (35.0%). Severe OHSS in the dyslipidemia group was significantly higher than that of the other group (35.0% vs. 19.5%, P = 0.038), and the total gonadotropin dose as well as BMI of patients with normal lipid metabolism were markedly lower than those patients in the dyslipidemia group (total gonadotropin, 1603.49 ± 519.49 vs. 1889.17 ± 749.28, P = 0.013; BMI,22.55 ± 3.24 vs.24.87 ± 4.15, P = 0.000). The logistic analysis (Table 3) of the freeze-all groups showed that after adjusting BMI and total gonadotropin dose, the risk of severe OHSS increased in patients with dyslipidemia compared with patients with normal lipid metabolism (OR:2.22, 95%CI:1.037–4.756).
Table 2. Comparison of freeze-all groups with normal lipid metabolism or dyslipidemia.
Table 3. Logistic repression of severe OHSS risk factors in freeze-all groups.
Comparison of Fresh Embryo Transfer (ET) Groups With Normal Lipid Metabolism or Dyslipidemia
Among the patients with fresh embryos transfer (Table 4), there were 35 cases of moderate OHSS (67.3%) and 17 cases of severe OHSS (32.7%) in the normal lipid metabolism group, whilst there were 24 cases of moderate OHSS (61.5%) and 15 cases of severe OHSS (38.5%) in the dyslipidemia group. The incidence of severe OHSS in dyslipidemia group was higher than that of the other group, but had no statistical significance (38.5% vs. 32.7%, P = 0.568). In addition, the age, total gonadotropin dose, number of oocytes retrieved and BMI between these two groups had no significance (P > 0.05). Compared with freeze-all groups, pregnancy is also a OHSS risk factor for analysis in ET groups. Among the ET groups, the rate of pregnancy is significantly higher in the normal lipid metabolism group than in the dyslipidemia group (82.7% vs. 74.4%, P = 0.000).
Table 4. Comparison of fresh embryo transfer groups with normal lipid metabolism or dyslipidemia.
Discussion
This study assessed the effect of lipid metabolism on the incidence of severe OHSS with 233 participants who received hospitalization after their IVF or ICSI cycles. Among the infertile women in freeze-all group, our study showed that patients with dyslipidemia were more likely to develop severe OHSS. However, the difference of severe OHSS incidence between ET groups was not significant.
According to previous literature, the freeze-all policy is commonly applied for prevention of OHSS. Compared with ET group, freeze-all group had more retrieved oocytes (24.38 ± 9.61 vs. 14.43 ± 5.01, P = 0.000) so that we compared characteristics and OHSS incidence within group, respectively, although the incidence of severe OHSS between those 2 groups had no significance in our study. The higher the number of retrieved oocytes, the higher the risk of OHSS. In our center, patients with high number of oocytes retrieved (≥15 generally as mentioned above) would receive freeze-all approach to prevent OHSS. We also found that patients with dyslipidemia had higher BMI and total gonadotropin dose compared with the ones with normal lipid metabolism in the freeze-all groups. BMI and gonadotropin dose have been considered to be the factors to affect the development of OHSS (Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2016). During the ovarian stimulation, doctors will adjust the dose of gonadotropin according to patients’ BMI. Generally speaking, patients with higher BMI need more dose of gonadotropin to promote follicle growth. In Table 2, logistic regression among patients who received freeze-all embryo showed that abnormal lipid metabolism might increase the risk of severe OHSS after adjusting the effect of BMI and total gonadotropin dose, although the two factors mentioned above had statistical significance between the dyslipidemia group and the normal lipid metabolism group.
Pregnancy is a main risk to develop OHSS. After pregnancy, the increase of endogenous HCG, which can stimulate granulosa-lutein cells to produce VEGF and VEGF recepter-2 messenger RNAs to enhance permeability of capillaries, aggravate and prolong the course of OHSS (Namavar et al., 2018). Referring to the comparison of freeze-all groups, the incidence of severe OHSS in patients with dyslipidemia was expected to be significantly higher than that in patients with normal lipid metabolism in ET groups. Among ET groups, the rate of pregnancy is significantly higher in the normal lipid metabolism group than in the dyslipidemia group. Therefore, the incidence of severe OHSS between the two groups with different status of lipid metabolism might be affected, especially when the possibility of pregnancy couldn’t be eliminated in this study. In addition, this research with small sample size in ET groups negated the difference of severe OHSS incidence. Even those were inadequate to explain the effect of lipid metabolism on OHSS development, a larger simple size is needed.
Hypovolemic shock, Liver or renal dysfunction and respiratory distress are severe complications of OHSS (Delbaere et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2008; Rizk and Ebrary, 2011). Recent studies have shown that the offspring of patents with OHSS are less intelligent than the ones of pregnant without OHSS (Xu et al., 2017). Because of the serious consequences, it is of critical importance to pay attention to prevention rather than clinical treatment of OHSS. According to the previous data in our center, the incidence of OHSS is about 1.5–2%. In addition to the factors mentioned above, young age, PCOS, previous OHSS, high level of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), elevated serum estradiol (E2) are also considered to be risk factors for the development of OHSS (Haning et al., 1983; Forman et al., 1990; MacDougall et al., 1992; Mizunuma et al., 1992; Delvigne et al., 1993; Mordel and Schenker, 1993; Buyalos and Lee, 1996; Whelan and Vlahos, 2000). Using low gonadotropin dose (75IU) in the start of COH, reducing the dose of trigger, changing the trigger time and freeze-all approach are commonly used in our center for those people with high risks of OHSS except GnRH antagonist protocol, and all of those strategies had been proved by researches (Nargund et al., 2007; Howles et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2016; Nelson, 2017; Shi et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018). Compared with the fresh embryo transfer, the rates of implantation and clinical pregnancy in freeze-all group were significantly higher (Zhang et al., 2018). Based on those study, patients with dyslipidemia can choose freeze-all embryo, which can shorten the course of early OHSS and prevent late OHSS.
The main strength of the study is that we demonstrated for the first time that dyslipidemia might be a risk factor for developing OHSS among patients without fresh embryo transfers after COH. This has not been confirmed before. Furthermore, all cases in this study received uniform infertility treatment (i.e., the same long-term protocol in midluteal phase for ovarian stimulation, standardized procedures of oocyte retrieval and fertilization, embryo selection, embryo transfer and luteal phase support). Concerned on the influence of fresh embryo transfer versus freeze-all strategy on the incidence of OHSS, we set subgroup analysis to avoid deviation. There are also limitations. The sample size was small, especially the ET group, and there was bias due to single-center analysis. On account of variable risk factors for the development of OHSS, our study mainly focuses on the lipid metabolism without exclusion of other factors such as age, BMI, pregnancy. Although the present study shows evidence favoring the effect of lipid metabolism on the incidence of OHSS among the patients who received freeze-all embryos, the evidence was not enough to establish a definitive causal link between them. In another words, our study try to provides a new perspective for predicting the incidence of OHSS. In addition, the limitations of the retrospective study make it essential to take further large-sample and multicenter clinical investigations to provide strong evidence regarding this aspect.
Conclusion
Our study suggests that patients with dyslipidemia who received the cryopreservation of all embryos after COH have a higher chance to develop severe OHSS compared with ones with normal lipid metabolism. It is essential to pay attention to the risk of incidence of OHSS in patients with dyslipidemia undergoing ART, especially those women not requiring fresh embryo transfers.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding authors.
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Institutional Review Board of Reproductive Medicine Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author Contributions
FL conceived and designed the study. FL and QJ analyzed the data. FL, QJ, and XS wrote the manuscript. YH and ZZ took part in the clinical data collection and supervised the entire work. FL, QJ, XS, YH, ZZ, TH, and YS provided final approval for the version to be published. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This project was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC1001004 and 2018YFC1003202), National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China (81701406), Taishan scholar project special funds (ts201712103), and Shandong Medical and Health Science and Technology Development Plan (201401).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank all investigators and patients who participated in this study.
References
Battisti, W. P., Palmisano, J., and Keane, W. E. (2003). Dyslipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. relationships between lipids, kidney disease and cardiovascular disease[J]. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 41, 1174–1181.
Buyalos, R. P., and Lee, C. T. (1996). Polycystic ovary syndrome: pathophysiology and outcome with in vitro fertilization[J]. Fertil Steril 65, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58017-0
Chan, W. S. (2009). The ‘ART’ of thrombosis: a review of arterial and venous thrombosis in assisted reproductive technology[J]. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 21, 207–218. doi: 10.1097/gco.0b013e328329c2b8
Chan, W. S., and Ginsberg, J. S. (2006). A review of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis in pregnancy: unmasking the ‘ART’ behind the clot[J]. J. Thromb. Haemost. 4, 1673–1677. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.02026.x
Chen, Z. J., Shi, Y., Sun, Y., Zhang, B., Liang, X., Cao, Y., et al. (2016). Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome[J]. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 523–533.
De Mouzon, J., Goossens, V., Bhattacharya, S., Castilla, J. A., Ferraretti, A. P., Korsak, V., et al. (2012). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2007: results generated from European registers by ESHRE[J]. Hum. Reprod. 27, 954–966.
Delbaere, A., Smits, G., De Leener, A., Costagliola, S., and Vassart, G. (2005). Understanding ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome[J]. Endocrine 26, 285–290.
Delvigne, A., Demoulin, A., Smitz, J., Donnez, J., Koninckx, P., Dhont, M., et al. (1993). The ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in in-vitro fertilization: a Belgian multicentric study. I. Clinical and biological features[J]. Hum. Reprod. 8, 1353–1360. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138260
European IVF-monitoring programme (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), Andersen, A. N., Gianaroli, L., Felberbaum, R., de Mouzon, J., and Nygren, K. G. (2006). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2002. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE[J]. Hum. Reprod. 21, 1680–1697. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del075
Forman, R. G., Frydman, R., Egan, D., Ross, C., and Barlow, D. H. (1990). Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome using agonists of gonadotropin-releasing hormone for in vitro fertilization: a European series and a proposal for prevention[J]. Fertil Steril 53, 502–509. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53348-2
Haning, R. V. Jr., Austin, C. W., Carlson, I. H., Kuzma, D. L., Shapiro, S. S., and Zweibel, W. J. (1983). Plasma estradiol is superior to ultrasound and urinary estriol glucuronide as a predictor of ovarian hyperstimulation during induction of ovulation with menotropins[J]. Fertil Steril 40, 31–36. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)47173-6
Herr, D., Bekes, I., and Wulff, C. (2013). Local renin-angiotensin system in the reproductive system[J]. Front. Endocrinol. 4:150.
Howles, C. M., Alam, V., Tredway, D., Homburg, R., and Warne, D. W. (2010). Factors related to successful ovulation induction in patients with WHO groupII anovulatory infertility[J]. Reprod. Biomed. Online 20, 182–190. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.11.017
Jenkins, A. J., Best, J. D., Klein, R. L., and Lyons, T. J. (2004). Lipoproteins, glycoxidation and diabetic angiopathy[J]. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 20, 349–368. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.491
Joint Committee for Developing Chinese Guidelines on Prevention and Treatment of Dyslipidemia in Adults (2016). 2016 Chinese guidelines on prevention and treatment of dyslipidemia in adults[J]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi 44, 833–853.
Lee, T. H., Liu, C. H., Huang, C. C., Wu, Y.-L., Shih, Y.-T., Ho, H.-N., et al. (2008). Serum anti-Müllerian hormone and estradiol levels as predictors of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in assisted reproduction technology cycles[J]. Hum. Reprod. 23, 160–167. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem254
Legro, R. S., Brzyski, R. G., Diamond, M. P., Coutifaris, C., Schlaff, W. D., Casson, P., et al. (2014). Letrozole versus clomiphene for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome[J]. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 119–129.
Leya, J., Molo, M. W., Olson, D., and Radwanska, E. (1991). Serum and follicular fluid (FF) estradiol (E2) levels in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) during in vitro fertilization (IVF) and gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) conception cycles after pituitary suppression[J]. J. In Vitro Fert. Embryo. Transf 8, 137–140. doi: 10.1007/bf01131702
MacDougall, M. J., Tan, S. L., and Jacobs, H. S. (1992). In-vitro fertilization and the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome[J]. Hum. Reprod. 7, 597–600.
Miller, I., Chuderland, D., Grossman, H., Ron-El, R., Ben-Ami, I., and Shalgi, R. (2016). The dual role of PEDF in the pathogenesis of OHSS: negating both angiogenic and inflammatory pathways[J]. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 101, 4699–4709. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-1744
Mizunuma, H., Andoh, K., Yamada, K., Takagi, T., Kamijo, T., and Ibuki, Y. (1992). Prediction and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation by monitoring endogenous luteinizing hormone release during purified follicle-stimulating hormone therapy[J]. Fertil Steril 58, 46–50. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55135-8
Mordel, N., and Schenker, J. G. (1993). Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in assisted reproduction[J]. Hum. Reprod. 8, 2009–2014. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137973
Motro, B., Itin, A., Sachs, L., and Keshet, E. (1990). Pattern of interleukin 6 gene expression in vivo suggests a role for this cytokine in angiogenesis[J]. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 3092–3096. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.8.3092
Namavar, J. B., Parsanezhad, M. E., Shomali, Z., Bakhshai, P., Alborzi, M., Vaziri, N. M., et al. (2018). Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a narrative review of its pathophysiology, risk factors, prevention, classification, and management[J]. Iran J. Med. Sci. 43, 248–260.
Nargund, G., Hutchison, L., Scaramuzzi, R., and Campbell, S. (2007). Low-dose HCG is useful in preventing OHSS in high-risk women without adversely affecting the outcome of IVF cycles[J]. Reprod. Biomed. Online 14, 682–685. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60668-2
Nelson, S. M. (2017). Prevention and management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome[J]. Thromb. Res. 151(Suppl. S1), S61–S64.
Padró, T., Vilahur, G., and Badimon, L. (2018). Dyslipidemias and Microcirculation[J]. Curr. Pharm. Des. 24, 2921–2926. doi: 10.2174/1381612824666180702154129
Pellicer, A., Albert, C., Mercader, A., Remohí, J., and Simón, C. (1999). The pathogenesis of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: in vivo studies investigating the role of interleukin-1beta, interleukin-6, and vascular endothelial growth factor[J]. Fertil Steril 71, 482–489. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00484-1
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2016). Prevention and treatment of moderate and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a guideline[J]. Fertil Steril 106, 1634–1647.
Rizk, B., and Ebrary, I. (2011). Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: epidemiology, pathophysiology, prevention and management[J]. Obstetric. Gynaecol. 9, 284–284.
Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group (2004). Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome[J]. Fertil Steril 81, 19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.10.004
Shi, Y., Sun, Y., Hao, C., Zhang, H., Wei, D., Zhang, Y., et al. (2018). Transfer of fresh versus frozen embryos in ovulatory women[J]. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 126–136.
Toftager, M., Bogstad, J., Bryndorf, T., Løssl, K., Roskær, J., Holland, T., et al. (2016). Risk of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocol: RCT including 1050 first IVF/ICSI cycles[J]. Hum. Reprod. 31, 1253–1264. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew051
Urbina, E. M., McCoy, C. E., Gao, Z., Khoury, P. R., Shah, A. S., Dolan, L. M., et al. (2017). Lipoprotein particle number and size predict vascular structure and function better than traditional lipids in adolescents and young adults[J]. J. Clin. Lipidol. 11, 1023–1031. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2017.05.011
Weijie, X., Haiyan, L., Yu, L., Yang, D., Wang, W., and Zhang, Q. (2015). Is the GnRH antagonist protocol effective at preventing OHSS for potentially high responders undergoing IVF/ICSI?[J]. PLoS One 10:e0140286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140286
Whelan, J. G. III, and Vlahos, N. F. (2000). The ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome[J]. Fertil Steril 73, 883–896.
Xu, G. F., Zhou, C. L., Xiong, Y. M., Li, J.-Y., Yu, T.-T., Tian, S., et al. (2017). Reduced intellectual ability in offspring of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a cohort study[J]. EBioMedicine 20, 263–267. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.05.020
Keywords: lipid metabolism disorders, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, assisted reproductive technology, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, fresh embryo transfer, freeze-all embryo
Citation: Liu F, Jiang Q, Sun X, Huang Y, Zhang Z, Han T and Shi Y (2020) Lipid Metabolic Disorders and Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome: A Retrospective Analysis. Front. Physiol. 11:491892. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.491892
Received: 16 August 2019; Accepted: 23 October 2020;
Published: 19 November 2020.
Edited by:
Jan Tesarik, MARGen Clinic, SpainReviewed by:
Salim Alfred Bassil, Al-Arz Hospital, LebanonBorut Kovacic, Maribor University Medical Centre, Slovenia
Copyright © 2020 Liu, Jiang, Sun, Huang, Zhang, Han and Shi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ting Han, aGFudGluZ3poYW9AMTYzLmNvbQ==; Yuhua Shi, c2hpeXVodWEyMDAzQDEyNi5jb20=
†These authors have contributed equally to this work