Abstract
Background: Physical exercise is a systematic sequence of movements executed with a predefined purpose. This muscular activity impacts not only on circulatory adaptations, but also neuronal integration with the potential to influence cognition. The aim of this review was to determine whether the literature supports the idea that physical exercise promotes cognitive benefits in healthy adults.
Methods: A systematic search for relevant articles was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis criteria using available databases (PubMed, LILACS, Scopus, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, OpenGrey, Google Scholar and CENTRAL). The search terms included “humans” or “adults” or “cognition” or “awareness” or “cognitive dissonance” or “cognitive reserve” or “comprehension” or “consciousness” and “motor activity” or “exercise” or “physical fitness,” and not “aged” or “nervous system diseases,” with the purpose of finding associations between moderate physical exercise and cognition. A methodological quality and risk of bias unit assessed the eligibility of articles.
Results: A total of 7179 articles were identified. Following review and quality assessment, three articles were identified to fulfill the inclusion criteria. An association between moderate physical exercise and cognition was observed. Improvements in cognitive parameters such as reduced simple reaction time, improved response precision and working memory were identified among the included articles.
Conclusion: This systematic review found that moderate physical exercise improves cognition.
Introduction
Physical exercise consists of a systematic sequence of movements executed with a predefined purpose (American College of Sports Medicine, 2009; Bowden et al., 2011) and is described by its effect on oxygen consumption as a percentage of maximum oxygen consumption (VO2 max) (Barstow et al., 1990; Drummond et al., 2005). The concept of physical exercise is a subcategory of physical activity (Caspersen et al., 1985). Since the seminal paper by Morris and Crawford (1958) which evaluated health in bus drivers, several papers have reported an association between regular exercise activity and a reduced risk for the development of cancer and cardiovascular disease. However, its effect on brain function seems less explored.
Neuronal integration involves multiple cognitive functions and neuronal networks, including work memory and spatial memory (Tucker and Stern, 2011; Moon et al., 2017). Both neurons and astrocytes need a constant supply of nutrients (glucose and lactate) and oxygen, and regional cerebral oxygenation may be limited during exercise (Nielsen et al., 1999; Rooks et al., 2010; Braz and Fisher, 2016) with a change in the balance of cerebraI metabolism (Avola et al., 2004; Dalsgaard and Secher, 2007; van Hall et al., 2009). In addition, specific neurotrophic growth factors seem to be released as a result of moderate physical exercise, which increases the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and neuronal growth factor (NGF) (Tyler and Pozzo-Miller, 2003; Dietrich et al., 2008; Seifert et al., 2010; Bonini et al., 2013; Coelho et al., 2014; Hashimoto et al., 2018). These factors contribute to increased cell survival and differentiation, as well as resistance to oxidative stress (Dietrich et al., 2008; Coelho et al., 2014). Furthermore, they can modulate neuroplasticity with an effect on brain function (Erickson et al., 2013). Another possible brain mechanism mediated by physical exercise could be related to the orexin system, increasing the release of orexin and orexin b. These are neuropeptides that modulate synaptic plasticity, neurogenesis, and cognition (Chieffi et al., 2017b,c).
Physical exercise may influence an individual's cognitive ability through its integrative effect on circulation and cerebral activity (van den Berg et al., 2016; Best et al., 2017); however, the scientific literature on this topic is limited. This systematic review aims to find evidence pointing to the effects of moderate physical exercise on cognitive functions in healthy adults.
Materials and methods
Study design
A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines (Moher et al., 2009). The review was registered in PROSPERO, the international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42016049663).
Participants, interventions, and comparators
This research followed the PICO strategy, as recommended by PRISMA group (Moher et al., 2009), to develop the search criteria and determine which relevant articles to include or exclude. Interventional studies focused on the effects of moderate physical exercise on healthy adults were included, presented in Table 1.
Table 1
| Inclusion Criteria | |
|---|---|
| P (participants) | Healthy humans at any age |
| I (intervention) | Physical activity |
| C (comparison) | Absence of Physical activity |
| O (Outcome) | Primary outcome: Changes is cognition |
| Secondary outcome: Correlation or association of another aspects, such as age, gender, previous history of smoking, alcohol, and body mass index in cognition outcome | |
| S (type of studies included) | Studies of intervention |
Inclusion criteria following the PICOS strategy (Moher et al., 2009).
Systematic review protocol
Two evaluators (MGC and RMF) performed an independent search, evaluated the validity of the publications and extracted duplicates of documents. The studies were evaluated based on the relevance of their titles and abstracts, and those that did not meet the PICO criteria were excluded. The evaluators then read the full-text versions of the selected articles. In case of disagreement, the two authors would give a joint evaluation. If any doubt remained, a third member of the research team was consulted (NCFF).
All articles that met the study requirements were included in this review. The exclusion criteria included in vitro experiments, literature reviews, laboratory animal studies, letters to the editor, case reports, opinions and guides. Studies that did not include cognitive tests were also excluded.
Search strategy
Electronic searches were conducted in eight databases: PubMed, LILACS, Scopus, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, OpenGrey, Google Scholar, The Cochrane Library and the The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Studies that investigated the effect of physical activity on the cognition of adult individuals without any central nervous system disorders or diseases (Supplementary Material) were included.
At the end of the search, alerts were created in each of the databases to identify any further references that could be included in this study. We also searched the references in the selected articles to find articles that met the search categories but had not been found in the selected databases. All reference records were imported to a reference manager software (EndNote X7, Thomas Reuters, Philadelphia, USA).
Selection of studies and data extraction
After the importation of the searches, the duplicated results were removed. The selection process was performed in two phases. The first phase includes an evaluation of tittles and abstracts according to PICO strategy (Table 1). In the phase two, the remaining articles were evaluated by full text according to the same criteria. The searches and selection process were conducted by two examiners (MGC and RMF) and checked by a third examiner (NCFF), in cases of disagreements.
After this phase, the data extraction of the included studies was performed. The data regarding the type of study, objective, sample characteristics, physical training, cognitive test, and main results were included in a table. In case of absence of information that makes data extraction or risk of bias evaluation impracticable, we attempted to contact the authors by e-mail. The contact consisted in sending a weekly email, for up to five consecutive weeks.
Risk of bias
The same evaluators also independently analyzed the methodological quality of all articles. Randomized trials were evaluated according to the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool. This tool evaluates the risk of bias as “low,” “high,” or “unclear” (Higgins et al., 2011) according to the items described in Table 2.
Table 2
| RANDOM SEQUENCE GENERATION | |
| Criteria for judgment of “Low risk” of bias | The articles that appropriately described the method of randomization |
| Criteria for judgment of “High risk” of bias | Articles that presented a methodological failure in the randomization criterion or the difficult reproducibility method |
| Criteria for judgment of “Unclear” of bias | When the articles did not describe the method of randomization |
| ALLOCATION CONCEALMENT | |
| Criteria for judgment of “Low risk” of bias | When the allocation sequence of samples were concealed in the randomization |
| Criteria for judgment of “High risk” of bias | When the sequence of allocation of samples were not concealed at randomization |
| Criteria for judgment of “Unclear risk” of bias | When the allocation sequences were unreported |
| BLINDING OF PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCHERS | |
| Criteria for judgment of “Low risk” of bias | When the sample was blind |
| Criteria for judgment of “High risk” of bias | If the methodology could not be blinded for whatever reason (sample/appraiser) |
| Criteria for judgment of “Unclear risk” of bias | When the sample was not reported either way |
| BLINDING OF OUTCOME ASSESSMENT | |
| Criteria for judgment of “Low risk” of bias | When the evaluators reported that the blinding in the evaluation was effective |
| Criteria for judgment of “High risk” of bias | If the study informed the evaluators how the blinding was done |
| Criteria for judgment of “Unclear risk” of bias | When the blinding was not reported |
| INCOMPLETE OUTCOME DATA | |
| Criteria for judgment of “Low risk” of bias | When there was an exhaustive description of the main data |
| Criteria for judgment of “High risk” of bias | If there was a loss due to an incomplete description of the main results regardless of quantity, nature and manipulation |
| Criteria for judgment of “Unclear risk” of bias | When the results were not reported |
| SELECTIVE REPORTING | |
| Criteria for judgment of “Low risk” of bias | When the discussion excluded some of the results |
| Criteria for judgment of “High risk” of bias | When the article discussed the data completely |
| Criteria for judgment of “Unclear risk” of bias | When the organization of the results in the discussion were unclear |
Criteria for risk assessment of bias according to “The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias (Higgins et al., 2011).
For non-randomized studies, the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) was used (Slim et al., 2003). This ranked the articles according to a list of 12 items, and each reviewer scored the articles according to a standard checklist where a score of 0 represented “not reported,” 1 was “reported but inadequate” and 2 was “reported and suitable” for the items described in Table 3.
Table 3
| CLEARLY STATED AIM | |
| Criteria for judgment of “0” of bias | When the objectives were not expressed |
| Criteria for judgment of “1” of bias | When a clear relationship between the objectives, results and conclusion was not found |
| Criteria for judgment of “2” of bias | When there was a relationship between the objectives of the article and its results and conclusions |
| INCLUSION OF CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS | |
| Criteria for judgment of “0” of bias | When the objectives were not expressed |
| Criteria for judgment of “1” of bias | When only the inclusion criteria was described or when it was not clear how the sample was selected |
| Criteria for judgment of “2” of bias | When the terms led to the samples' inclusion and exclusion and were clearly described |
| PROSPECTIVE DATA COLLECTION | |
| Criteria for judgment of “0” of bias | When there was no information reported |
| Criteria for judgment of “1” of bias | When there were changes |
| Criteria for judgment of “2” of bias | When the data collection was already established at the beginning of the study |
| ENDPOINTS APPROPRIATE TO STUDY AIM | |
| Criteria for judgment of “0” of bias | When unreported |
| Criteria for judgment of “1” of bias | If the techniques were not well explained or leave doubt regarding the methodology |
| Criteria for judgment of “2” of bias | If the evaluation techniques are well explained and were already referenced and answered the purpose of the study |
| UNBIASED ASSESSMENT OF STUDY ENDPOINT | |
| Criteria for judgment of “0” of bias | When it was not reported |
| Criteria for judgment of “1” of bias | When, due to some limitation, the methodology was not a blind sample |
| Criteria for judgment of “2” of bias | If the existence of the double-blind analysis was described |
| FOLLOW-UP PERIOD APPROPRIATE TO STUDY AIM | |
| Criteria for judgment of “0” of bias | When the results were unreported |
| Criteria for judgment of “1” of bias | When the literature did not provide information about the training time and the post-training window |
| Criteria for judgment of “2” of bias | If the literature referenced the training time preference and the post-training window |
| LOSS TO FOLLOW UP <5% | |
| Criteria for judgment of “0” of bias | When the results were not reported |
| Criteria for judgment of “1” of bias | When the loss was higher than 5% and justified by the study |
| Criteria for judgment of “2” of bias | When the loss in the sample was reported as <5% |
| PROSPECTIVE CALCULATION OF STUDY SIZE | |
| Criteria for judgment of “0” of bias | When the results were not reported |
| Criteria for judgment of “1” of bias | When the sample calculation was not performed, but explained |
| Criteria for judgment of “2” of bias | When the calculation methodology for the definition of the sample was reported |
| AN ADEQUATE CONTROL GROUP | |
| Criteria for judgment of “0” of bias | When the criteria was not reported |
| Criteria for judgment of “1” of bias | When the criteria for group choice were unclear |
| Criteria for judgment of “2” of bias | If the control group was made up of sedentary, healthy people and the criteria for the group selection was clear |
| CONTEMPORARY GROUPS | |
| Criteria for judgment of “0” of bias | When these details were not reported |
| Criteria for judgment of “1” of bias | When one of the groups already had a training routine |
| Criteria for judgment of “2” of bias | When the groups started the training together |
| BASELINE EQUIVALENCE OF GROUPS | |
| Criteria for judgment of “0” of bias | When these details were not reported |
| Criteria for judgment of “1” of bias | When the groups did not have the same demographic characteristics |
| Criteria for judgment of “2” of bias | When the groups had similar demographics |
| ADEQUATE STATISTICAL ANALYSES | |
| Criteria for judgment of “0” of bias | When the tests were either unsuitable for the type of study or not reported |
| Criteria for judgment of “1” of bias | When the descriptions of the performed tests were not clear |
| Criteria for judgment of “2” of bias | When the test was used according to the type of study and was clearly described |
Criteria for risk assessment of bias according to Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) (Slim et al., 2003).
The quality of the article was evaluated by the sum of the values obtained in the MINORS qualifier, with a score of 0–6 indicating very low quality, 7–12 low quality, 13–18 moderate quality and 19–24 representing high quality (Khan et al., 2015).
Results
Description of studies
There were a total of 7,179 citations about this topic identified in the different databases. Scopus had the most (n = 3,666), followed by Central Register of Controlled-CENTRAL (n = 2,027), Lilacs (n = 654), Web of Science (n = 430), PubMed (n = 300), Cochrane Library (n = 76), Google Scholar (n = 26) then finally OpenGrey (n = 0). Figure 1 summarizes the study selection process. From the 7,179 citations, 414 duplicates were withdrawn and 6,765 remained.
Figure 1
A total of 155 papers were selected according to their title and abstract, of which seven (Biddle and Ashford, 1988; Brown et al., 1995; Bue-Estes et al., 2008; Douw et al., 2014; Lee et al., 2014; Tsai et al., 2014; Olson et al., 2016) were chosen based on the eligibility criteria for full-text reading. Four articles were excluded, two (Douw et al., 2014; Lee et al., 2014) were excluded due to the absence of a control group, and the other two (Biddle and Ashford, 1988; Brown et al., 1995) due to the absence of specific cognition tests. Three articles (Bue-Estes et al., 2008; Tsai et al., 2014; Olson et al., 2016) were selected and submitted to a qualitative synthesis.
Study selection and characteristics
The main characteristics of the included articles are listed in Table 4. In the three studies there was an association between moderate physical exercise and cognition. While the included articles each used a different evaluation tool, they all evaluated reaction time as a common parameter to measure cognition. Reaction time is the time elapsed between a stimuli and the response. Each study showed a positive correlation between moderate physical exercise by a different parameter improvement as tested by the following methods: Automated neuropsychological assessment metrics, which evaluates the reaction time, memory, attention, concentration, thinking speed and decision making; the Eriksen flanker task test, which evaluated the reaction time and precision of the response; Visuospatial attention, which assess the reaction time.
Table 4
| Type of study | Objective of the study | Sample | Type of training | Cognitive test | Statistical analysis | Results | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bue-Estes et al., 2008 | Analytical-experimental, Non-randomized study | To analyse the effect of acute and chronic aerobic exercise on the cognitive performance of adult women | 27 Women between the ages of 18 and 25 | Treadmill in the intensities 25, 50, 75, and 100% of VO2 max. | Automated neuropsychological assessment metrics (ANAM) | Linear regression analysis | In this study, the trained group showed improvement in the Simple Reaction test, with shorter reaction times, as well as improved working memory in relation to the sedentary group SIMPLE REACTION: The following result shows the response time of individuals in milliseconds (ms). sedentary (285 ms, SD 49.3) and active (252 ms SD 27.4), p < 0.009 WORKING MEMORY: p < 0.001 |
| Olson et al., 2016 | Analytical-experimental study, randomized | To investigate the dose-response effects of aerobic exercise intensity on cognitive control through behavioral and neuroelectric analysis | 27 Adults 18–35 years old (men and women) | Bicycle ergometer group low intensity 40% and moderate intensity 60% of VO2 max. | Eriksen flanker task test | Analysis of Variance (Anova) post hoc Bonferroni | The results of this study show a significant difference for moderate intensity in relation to low and control in the test of reaction time and reduction in the accuracy of response REACTION TIME: p < 0.05 (congruent and incongruent) Accuracy of response: p < 0.05 (incongruent) |
| Tsai et al., 2014 | Analytical-experimental study, randomized | To evaluate the effect of aerobic exercise of moderate intensity on the behavioral, neuroelectric performance in the BDNF levels, and a possible correlation between these factors | 60 Men between the ages of 19 and 28 | Moderate group VO2 max. = 58.04–6.67 mL/kg/min and low group VO2 max. = 36.04–3.64 mL/kg/min) | Visuospatial Attention Test | Analysis of Variance (Anova) post hoc Bonferroni | In this work the low intensity group was better than control and the moderate intensity was superior to the two groups, in the reaction time test and, without difference in the accuracy rate REACTION TIME: p < 0.05 |
Data extraction from selected studies.
Risk of bias
The risk of bias in randomized articles was determined based on the Cochrane Collaboration's tool (Figure 2). When evaluated, the “blinding of outcome assessment” was classified as high risk in two studies. For the topics “incomplete outcome data” and “selective reporting” the included articles were classified as low risk. Among the included articles, the article by Tsai et al. (2014) presented the highest index. In contrast, the lowest risk of bias was observed in the article by Olson et al. (2016).
Figure 2
When the article by Bue-Estes et al. (2008) was evaluated (Table 5), it was revealed to be moderate quality with a score of 13 out of a maximum of 24 points (Khan et al., 2015). For the topics “clearly stated aim,” “inclusion of consecutive patients,” “endpoints appropriate to study aim,” “adequate control group,” and “baseline equivalence of groups,” the study achieved the maximum score (2). The article did not report information for the topics “follow-up period appropriates to study aim,” “<5% lost to follow-up,” “prospective calculation of study size” and “contemporary groups,” therefore, these were scored null (0).
Table 5
| Bue-Estes et al., 2008 | |
|---|---|
| Clearly stated aim | 2 |
| Inclusion of consecutive patients | 2 |
| Prospective data collection | 1 |
| Endpoints appropriate to study aim | 2 |
| Unbiased assessment of study endpoint | 1 |
| Follow-up period appropriate to study aim | 0 |
| < 5% lost to follow-up | 0 |
| Prospective calculation of study size | 0 |
| Adequate control group | 2 |
| Contemporary groups | 0 |
| Baseline equivalence of groups | 2 |
| Adequate statistical analyses | 1 |
| TOTAL | 13/24 |
| MINORS Quality score | MQ |
Individual MINORS score.
Discussion
This systematic review investigated the effects of moderate physical exercise on cognition. All three studies included in this review (Bue-Estes et al., 2008; Tsai et al., 2014; Olson et al., 2016) concluded that physical exercise seems to improve some cognitive parameters in adults, such as simple reaction time, response accuracy and working memory.
The systematic review could be an effective tool to answer specific questions from primary studies on a subject (Cook et al., 1997), in addition to evaluating the quality of the information and the risk of bias in the articles (Sanderson et al., 2007).
In this systematic review, all studies shown an improvement of cognitive parameters related to moderate physical exercise, such as reduced simple reaction time and improved precision of response to a visual motor stimulus and working memory may be related to exercise intensity (Macpherson et al., 2011), which was measured by VO2 max (Bue-Estes et al., 2008; Tsai et al., 2014; Olson et al., 2016). This methodological variable of physical training (intensity) was the same in the three selected articles. In the selected articles, exercise intensity was quantified by the VO2 max test, which is considered a gold standard to quantify exercise intensity and provides a basis for ensuring that the obtained results are in accordance by the proposed training.
High-intensity exercise may depress cognitive ability (van den Berg et al., 2016), but moderate-intensity exercise improves this function when the simple reaction time is evaluated (Tsai et al., 2014). On the other hand, studies have shown that sedentary groups who do low-intensity exercise show no difference when compared to sedentary groups (Voss et al., 2011; Olson et al., 2016). The current evident indicates that exercise prescriptions to improve cognition should not be at the extremes of intensity (Voss et al., 2011; Tsai et al., 2014; Olson et al., 2016; van den Berg et al., 2016), and thus should have a linear relationship with this variable, corroborating the findings of this review.
Among the included studies, different forms of exercise performed by individuals from different age groups and both genders, showing similar results on Improvement of cognitive function. This may be related to the characteristics of the exercise performed, which was primarily aerobic in all of the analyzed studies. Quantification of exercise by VO2 max (Koutlianos et al., 2013) can be used to individually quantify the intensity according to independent physical exercise variables such as the type of exercise, gender and age.
The cognitive improvements reported in the selected articles may be associated with the capacity of moderate exercise to modulate the central nervous system. Aerobic physical exercise is related to elevated levels of orexin-A and orexin-B (Messina et al., 2016), both neuropeptides synthesized in the hypothalamus that increase neurogenesis and connections between hippocampal neurons, especially in the dentate gyrus, an area involved in cognition (Oomen et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2015; Chieffi et al., 2017a; Trinchero et al., 2017). Orexin-A has neuroprotective and anti-apoptotic effects, and is essential for better performance in terms of attention and working memory (Deadwyler et al., 2007).
Orexin-B/hypocretin-2 (OxB/Hcrt-2) increases the expression of BDNF mRNA leading to increased production of BDNF (Chieffi et al., 2017b), a neurotrophic factor which plays an essential role in cognition (Lee et al., 2015). High levels of BDNF in the hippocampal region modulates long-term potentiation and synaptic plasticity, stimulating learning and memory (Nettiksimmons et al., 2014), in addition to increasing working memory in the prefrontal cortex (Yeom et al., 2016).
Another growth factor that is increased with physical exercise is vascular endothelial gowth factor (VEGF), which promotes angiogenesis (Morland et al., 2017) and is directly associated with neurogenesis and improvement of synaptic function. Thus, VEGF can influence cognitive function through neurogenesis, cerebral blood flow and modulation of long-term potentiation; however, the underlying mechanism has not yet been fully elucidated (Ng et al., 2014).
New blood vessels formed through angiogenesis are unstable (Darland and D'Amore, 1999). The presence of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) is essential as it is responsible for the maturation and stability of these neovessels (Jacobo and Kazlauskas, 2015). It is interesting to note that studies have suggested that physical exercise contributes to stabilizing neovessels due to the associated increase in IGF-1 production (Carro et al., 2000; Nakamura et al., 2010; Jacobo and Kazlauskas, 2015).
As suggested by studies and animals and humans, the moderate physical exercise is related to an increase in different neutrophins, as well as to the homeostasis and energetic regulation of nervous system (Kerr et al., 2010; Rhyu et al., 2010; Swain et al., 2012; Marosi and Mattson, 2014; Bathina and Das, 2015; Jacobo and Kazlauskas, 2015; Camerino et al., 2016; Chieffi et al., 2017b,c; Morland et al., 2017). These changes contribute to an increase on plasticity, the formation of new synapses and the integration of neurons to neurons circuits (Gomez-Palacio-Schjetnan and Escobar, 2013; Lu et al., 2014; Phillips, 2017). The improvement of cognition is suggested as a result of this modulation (Colicos and Syed, 2006).
Cognition is a set of processes which functions to classify, recognize and understand information by reasoning through learning and executing responses (Vaynman et al., 2004). However, the three chosen articles only evaluated reaction time parameters, working memory and the accuracy of response. Executive function is an example of a higher cognitive process and includes capabilities such as goal setting, planning and executing action plans and effectively performing actions (Jurado and Rosselli, 2007). Cognition can be modulated throughout life under various stimuli, and varies according to educational level (Liu et al., 2017), nutritional quality (Moody et al., 2017), activity of antioxidants (Farah et al., 2016), and the practice of physical exercise (Atherton et al., 2016; Cadenas-Sanchez et al., 2016).
Several tests are available to the functional evaluation of cognitive parameters (Sanders and Lamers, 2002; Stins et al., 2007; Tsoi et al., 2015). Among them, the primary example of these tests are: STROOP Task (Erdodi et al., 2018), Simon Test (Stoet, 2017), Visual Spatial Attention (Tsai et al., 2016; Byun et al., 2017) and Eriksen Flanker Task (Swatridge et al., 2017; Baumgartner et al., 2018). The Visual Spatial Attention and Eriksen Flanker Task were used among the included studies. All of these tests are used to study the interaction between processing speed, executive functions and working memory, important cognitive domains, which allow us to evaluate selective attention ability and ability, as well as planning, decision making and interference management in real world (Zeischka et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2013; Diamond, 2013).
Another test used in one of the included articles (Bue-Estes et al., 2008) is the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM). This tool is composed by computerized cognitive tests and behavioral questionnaires (Vincent et al., 2017). This tool was previoulsy described as a time-cost efficient feature and presenting a moderate sensitivity and a high specificity when compared to traditional neuropsychological tests,(Jones et al., 2008; Xie et al., 2015; Cole et al., 2017; Paech et al., 2017; Vincent et al., 2017).
In the articles included in this review (Bue-Estes et al., 2008; Tsai et al., 2014; Olson et al., 2016), reaction time as a cognitive parameter was found to be improved, as seen in Table 4. This is an important parameter that can help evaluate the speed of information processing (Batra et al., 2015). These processes were analyzed for their speed and accuracy in terms of response (van Ede et al., 2012), thus evidencing a possible association between moderate physical exercise and improvement of the synaptic network integration involved in this action.
Working memory was another altered cognitive parameter described in one of the articles, which is characterized by the ability to reorganize lists, organize thoughts to form meaningful sentences, incorporate new information, consider options and relate ideas and thoughts (Baddeley, 2012). This was only evaluated in one of the studies (Bue-Estes et al., 2008), in which the authors found an improvement in the group that performed moderate physical exercise compared to the control group and the intensity of the moderate physical exercise group, evidencing a specific effect of exercise intensity.
Cognition can be modulated throughout life under various stimuli, and varies according to educational level (Liu et al., 2017), nutritional quality (Moody et al., 2017), activity of antioxidants (Farah et al., 2016) and the practice of physical exercise (Atherton et al., 2016; Cadenas-Sanchez et al., 2016).
To evaluate the methodological soundness on individual studies regarding their validity and risk of bias, two tools were used: the MINORS tool, a non-randomized tool, and the Cochrane collaboration's tool, used for randomized studies. Among the two randomized studies, one was classified as low risk (Olson et al., 2016) and the other as uncertain risk (Tsai et al., 2014), taking into account the critical key domains chosen for this review.
From the MINORS tool, one of the articles was considered moderate quality (Bue-Estes et al., 2008) while the other had a high risk of bias regarding parameters related to blinding. This was not a critical parameter for this review due to its non-viability, as blinding ensures ignorance (study participants, researchers, medical staff, statisticians) regarding the allocation of participants to one group or another (Higgins et al., 2011).
It is also worth mentioning that during the recruitment of individuals, all the included studies reported that they received information about the procedures and purpose of the research (Bue-Estes et al., 2008; Tsai et al., 2014; Olson et al., 2016). Therefore, this was not one of the major domains for evaluating the quality of the articles included in this systematic review as it interferes with the reliability of this information (Higgins et al., 2011).
Limitations
Despite the moderate methodological quality and risk of bias of the included articles, moderate physical exercise appears to play a relevant role in the improvement of some cognitive parameters such as simple reaction time, response precision and working memory. However, these are just some of the existing cognitive parameters, and it is important that additional investigations with greater methodological accuracy be carried out by elucidating unexplored parameters in the selected articles.
Conclusion
Practicing moderate physical exercise may improve cognition in individuals who seek to improve their routinely used cognitive functions and for those who want to prevent or delay cognitive decline.
Statements
Author contributions
RF and MC contributed equally to this work. RF and MC designed the systematic review and supervised the entire program. RL, MdS, and LM reviewed all the studies and extracted the information from the eligible trials. NF and AA analyzed the data and prepared the figures and table. RF and MC wrote the paper. RL, MS, and LM revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2018.00667/full#supplementary-material
References
1
American College of Sports Medicine (2009). American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.41, 687–708. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181915670
2
AthertonN.BridleC.BrownD.CollinsH.DosanjhS.GriffithsF.et al. (2016). Dementia and Physical Activity (DAPA)-an exercise intervention to improve cognition in people with mild to moderate dementia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials17:165. 10.1186/s13063-016-1288-2
3
AvolaR.Di TullioM. A.FisichellaA.TayebatiS. K.TomassoniD. (2004). Glial fibrillary acidic protein and vimentin expression is regulated by glucocorticoids and neurotrophic factors in primary rat astroglial cultures. Clin. Exp. Hypertens.26, 323–333. 10.1081/CEH-120034137
4
BaddeleyA. (2012). Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annu. Rev. Psychol.63, 1–29. 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422
5
BarstowT. J.LamarraN.WhippB. J. (1990). Modulation of muscle and pulmonary O2 uptakes by circulatory dynamics during exercise. J. Appl. Physiol.68, 979–989. 10.1152/jappl.1990.68.3.979
6
BathinaS.DasU. N. (2015). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor and its clinical implications. Arch. Med. Sci.11, 1164–1178. 10.5114/aoms.2015.56342
7
BatraK.KumarA.KumarV.NandaT.MaanN. S.MaanS. (2015). Development and evaluation of loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for rapid detection of Capripoxvirus. Vet. World8, 1286–1292. 10.14202/vetworld.2015.1286-1292
8
BaumgartnerN. W.WalkA. M.EdwardsC. G.CovelloA. R.ChojnackiM. R.ReeserG. E.et al. (2018). Relationship between physical activity, adiposity, and attentional inhibition. J. Phys. Act. Health15, 191–196. 10.1123/jpah.2017-0181
9
BestJ. R.ChiuB. K.HallP. A.Liu-AmbroseT. (2017). Larger lateral prefrontal cortex volume predicts better exercise adherence among older women: evidence from two exercise training studies. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.72, 804–810. 10.1093/gerona/glx043
10
BiddleS. J.AshfordB. (1988). Cognitions and perceptions of health and exercise. Br. J. Sports Med.22, 135–140. 10.1136/bjsm.22.4.135
11
BoniniM.FiorettiD.SargentiniV.Del GiaccoS.RinaldiM.TranquilliC.et al. (2013). Increased nerve growth factor serum levels in top athletes. Clin. J. Sport Med.23, 228–231. 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31827ee6d5
12
BowdenM. G.EmbryA. E.GregoryC. M. (2011). Physical therapy adjuvants to promote optimization of walking recovery after stroke. Stroke Res. Treat.2011:601416. 10.4061/2011/601416
13
BrazI. D.FisherJ. P. (2016). The impact of age on cerebral perfusion, oxygenation and metabolism during exercise in humans. J. Physiol.594, 4471–4483. 10.1113/JP271081
14
BrownD. R.WangY.WardA.EbbelingC. B.FortlageL.PuleoE.et al. (1995). Chronic psychological effects of exercise and exercise plus cognitive strategies. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.27, 765–775. 10.1249/00005768-199505000-00021
15
Bue-EstesC. L.WillerB.BurtonH.LeddyJ. J.WildingG. E.HorvathP. J. (2008). Short-term exercise to exhaustion and its effects on cognitive function in young women. Percept. Mot. Skills107, 933–945. 10.2466/pms.107.3.933-945
16
ByunJ. I.LeeB. U.KimM.SunwooJ. S.LimJ. A.MoonJ.et al. (2017). Reduced P300 amplitude during a visuospatial attention task in idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder. Sleep Med.38, 78–84. 10.1016/j.sleep.2017.06.037
17
Cadenas-SanchezC.Mora-GonzalezJ.MiguelesJ. H.Martin-MatillasM.Gomez-VidaJ.Escolano-MargaritM. V.et al. (2016). An exercise-based randomized controlled trial on brain, cognition, physical health and mental health in overweight/obese children (ActiveBrains project): rationale, design and methods. Contemp. Clin. Trials47, 315–324. 10.1016/j.cct.2016.02.007
18
CamerinoC.ConteE.CannoneM.CaloieroR.FonzinoA.TricaricoD. (2016). Nerve growth factor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor and osteocalcin gene relationship in energy regulation, bone homeostasis and reproductive organs analyzed by mRNA quantitative evaluation and linear correlation analysis. Front. Physiol.7:456. 10.3389/fphys.2016.00456
19
CarroE.NunezA.BusiguinaS.Torres-AlemanI. (2000). Circulating insulin-like growth factor I mediates effects of exercise on the brain. J. Neurosci.20, 2926–2933. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-08-02926.2000
20
CaspersenC. J.PowellK. E.ChristensonG. M. (1985). Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep.100, 126–131.
21
ChenA.TangD.ChenX. (2013). Training reveals the Sources of Stroop and Flanker Interference Effects. PLoS ONE8:e76580. 10.1371/journal.pone.0076580
22
ChenH.IinumaM.OnozukaM.KuboK.-Y. (2015). Chewing maintains hippocampus-dependent cognitive function. Int. J. Med. Sci.12, 502–509. 10.7150/ijms.11911
23
ChieffiS.CarotenutoM.MondaV.ValenzanoA.VillanoI.PrecenzanoF.et al. (2017a). Orexin system: the key for a healthy life. Front. Physiol.8:357. 10.3389/fphys.2017.00357
24
ChieffiS.MessinaG.VillanoI.MessinaA.EspositoM.MondaV.et al. (2017b). Exercise influence on hippocampal function: possible involvement of Orexin-A. Front. Physiol.8:85. 10.3389/fphys.2017.00085
25
ChieffiS.MessinaG.VillanoI.MessinaA.ValenzanoA.MoscatelliF.et al. (2017c). Neuroprotective effects of physical activity: evidence from human and animal studies. Front. Physiol.8:188. 10.3389/fneur.2017.00188
26
CoelhoF. G.VitalT. M.SteinA. M.ArantesF. J.RuedaA. V.CamariniR.et al. (2014). Acute aerobic exercise increases brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in elderly with Alzheimer's disease. J. Alzheimers. Dis.39, 401–408. 10.3233/JAD-131073
27
ColeW. R.GregoryE.ArrieuxJ. P.HaranF. J. (2017). Intra-individual cognitive variability: an examination of ANAM4 TBI-MIL simple reaction time data from service members with and without mild traumatic brain injury. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1017/S1355617717000856
28
ColicosM. A.SyedN. I. (2006). Neuronal networks and synaptic plasticity: understanding complex system dynamics by interfacing neurons with silicon technologies. J. Exp. Biol.209, 2312–2319. 10.1242/jeb.02163
29
CookD. J.MulrowC. D.HaynesR. B. (1997). Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann. Intern. Med.126, 376–380. 10.7326/0003-4819-126-5-199703010-00006
30
DalsgaardM. K.SecherN. H. (2007). The brain at work: a cerebral metabolic manifestation of central fatigue?J. Neurosci. Res.85, 3334–3339. 10.1002/jnr.21274
31
DarlandD. C.D'AmoreP. A. (1999). Blood vessel maturation: vascular development comes of age. J. Clin. Invest.103, 157–158. 10.1172/JCI6127
32
DeadwylerS. A.PorrinoL.SiegelJ. M.HampsonR. E. (2007). Systemic and nasal delivery of orexin-A (Hypocretin-1) reduces the effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance in nonhuman primates. J. Neurosci.27, 14239–14247. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3878-07.2007
33
DiamondA. (2013). Executive Functions. Annu. Rev. Psychol.64, 135–168. 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
34
DietrichM. O.AndrewsZ. B.HorvathT. L. (2008). Exercise-induced synaptogenesis in the hippocampus is dependent on UCP2-regulated mitochondrial adaptation. J. Neurosci.28, 10766–10771. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2744-08.2008
35
DouwL.NieboerD.Van DijkB. W.StamC. J.TwiskJ. W. R. (2014). A healthy brain in a healthy body: brain network correlates of physical and mental fitness. PLoS ONE9:e88202. 10.1371/journal.pone.0088202
36
DrummondM. J.VehrsP. R.SchaaljeG. B.ParcellA. C. (2005). Aerobic and resistance exercise sequence affects excess postexercise oxygen consumption. J. Strength Cond. Res.19, 332–337. 10.1519/R-14353.1
37
ErdodiL. A.SagarS.SekeK.ZuccatoB. G.SchwartzE. S.RothR. M. (2018). The Stroop test as a measure of performance validity in adults clinically referred for neuropsychological assessment. Psychol. Assess. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1037/pas0000525
38
EricksonK. I.GildengersA. G.ButtersM. A. (2013). Physical activity and brain plasticity in late adulthood. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci.15, 99–108.
39
FarahR.GilbeyP.GrozovskiM.AsliH.Khamisy-FarahR.AssyN. (2016). Antioxidant enzyme activity and cognition in obese individuals with or without metabolic risk factors. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes124, 568–571. 10.1055/s-0042-113125
40
Gomez-Palacio-SchjetnanA.EscobarM. L. (2013). Neurotrophins and synaptic plasticity. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci.15, 117–136. 10.1007/7854_2012_231
41
HashimotoT.TsukamotoH.TakenakaS.OlesenN. D.PetersenL. G.SorensenH.et al. (2018). Maintained exercise-enhanced brain executive function related to cerebral lactate metabolism in men. FASEB J.32, 1417–1427. 10.1096/fj.201700381RR
42
HigginsJ. P. T.AltmanD. G.GøtzscheP. C.JüniP.MoherD.OxmanA. D.et al. (2011). The cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ343:d5928. 10.1136/bmj.d5928
43
JacoboS. M.KazlauskasA. (2015). Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) stabilizes nascent blood vessels. J. Biol. Chem.290, 6349–6360. 10.1074/jbc.M114.634154
44
JonesW. P.LoeS. A.KrachS. K.RagerR. Y.JonesH. M. (2008). Automated neuropsychological assessment metrics (Anam) and Woodcock-Johnson III tests of cognitive ability: a concurrent validity study. Clin. Neuropsychol.22, 305–320. 10.1080/13854040701281483
45
JuradoM. B.RosselliM. (2007). The elusive nature of executive functions: a review of our current understanding. Neuropsychol. Rev.17, 213–233. 10.1007/s11065-007-9040-z
46
KerrA. L.SteuerE. L.PochtarevV.SwainR. A. (2010). Angiogenesis but not neurogenesis is critical for normal learning and memory acquisition. Neuroscience171, 214–226. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.08.008
47
KhanW.KhanM.AlradwanH.WilliamsR.SimunovicN.AyeniO. R. (2015). Utility of intra-articular hip injections for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review. Orthop. J. Sports Med.3:2325967115601030. 10.1177/2325967115601030
48
KoutlianosN.DimitrosE.MetaxasT.CansizM.DeligiannisA. S.KouidiE. (2013). Indirect estimation of VOmax in athletes by ACSM's equation: valid or not?Hippokratia17, 136–140.
49
LeeJ. K. W.AngW. H.NgJ. W. X.FanP. W. P.TeoY. S.NolteH. W.et al. (2014). Effects of a carbohydrate-electrolyte solution on cognitive performance following exercise-induced hyperthermia in humans. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr.11:51. 10.1186/s12970-014-0051-x
50
LeeS. J.BaekJ.-H.KimY.-H. (2015). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor is associated with cognitive impairment in elderly korean individuals. Clin. Psychopharmacol. Neurosci.13, 283–287. 10.9758/cpn.2015.13.3.283
51
LiuY. C.LiuY. Y.YipP. K.MeguroM.MeguroK. (2017). Speaking one more language in early life has only minor effects on cognition in Taiwanese with low education level: the Taishan Project. Psychogeriatrics17, 256–261. 10.1111/psyg.12230
52
LuB.NagappanG.LuY. (2014). BDNF and synaptic plasticity, cognitive function, and dysfunction. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol.220, 223–250. 10.1007/978-3-642-45106-5_9
53
MacphersonR. E.HazellT. J.OlverT. D.PatersonD. H.LemonP. W. (2011). Run sprint interval training improves aerobic performance but not maximal cardiac output. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.43, 115–122. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181e5eacd
54
MarosiK.MattsonM. P. (2014). BDNF mediates adaptive brain and body responses to energetic challenges. Trends Endocrinol. Metab.25, 89–98. 10.1016/j.tem.2013.10.006
55
MessinaG.Di BernardoG.ViggianoA.De LucaV.MondaV.MessinaA.et al. (2016). Exercise increases the level of plasma orexin A in humans. J. Basic Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol.27, 611–616. 10.1515/jbcpp-2015-0133
56
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G.GroupP. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med.6:e1000097. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
57
MoodyL.ChenH.PanY. X. (2017). Early-life nutritional programming of cognition-the fundamental role of epigenetic mechanisms in mediating the relation between early-life environment and learning and memory process. Adv. Nutr.8, 337–350. 10.3945/an.116.014209
58
MoonC. M.YangJ. C.JeongG. W. (2017). Functional neuroanatomy associated with the interaction between emotion and cognition in explicit memory tasks in patients with generalized anxiety disorder. Acta Radiol.58, 98–106. 10.1177/0284185116633915
59
MorlandC.AnderssonK. A.HaugenØ. P.HadzicA.KleppaL.GilleA.et al. (2017). Exercise induces cerebral VEGF and angiogenesis via the lactate receptor HCAR1. Nat. Commun.8:15557. 10.1038/ncomms15557
60
MorrisJ. N.CrawfordM. D. (1958). Coronary heart disease and physical activity of work. Br. Med. J.2, 1485–1496. 10.1136/bmj.2.5111.1485
61
NakamuraK.SasajimaJ.MizukamiY.SugiyamaY.YamazakiM.FujiiR.et al. (2010). Hedgehog promotes neovascularization in pancreatic cancers by regulating Ang-1 and IGF-1 expression in bone-marrow derived pro-angiogenic cells. PLoS ONE5:e8824. 10.1371/journal.pone.0008824
62
NettiksimmonsJ.SimonsickE. M.HarrisT.SatterfieldS.RosanoC.YaffeK.et al. (2014). The associations between serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor, potential confounders, and cognitive decline: a longitudinal study. PLoS ONE9:e91339. 10.1371/journal.pone.0091339
63
NgT.CheungY. T.NgQ. S.HoH. K.ChanA. (2014). Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors and cognitive impairment: evidence and controversies. Expert Opin. Drug Saf.13, 83–92. 10.1517/14740338.2013.828034
64
NielsenH. B.BoushelR.MadsenP.SecherN. H. (1999). Cerebral desaturation during exercise reversed by O2 supplementation. Am. J. Physiol.277(3 Pt 2), H1045–H1052. 10.1152/ajpheart.1999.277.3.H1045
65
OlsonR. L.ChangY. K.BrushC. J.KwokA. N.GordonV. X.AldermanB. L. (2016). Neurophysiological and behavioral correlates of cognitive control during low and moderate intensity exercise. Neuroimage131, 171–180. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.011
66
OomenC. A.BekinschteinP.KentB. A.SaksidaL. M.BusseyT. J. (2014). Adult hippocampal neurogenesis and its role in cognition. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci.5, 573–587. 10.1002/wcs.1304
67
PaechG. M.CrowleyS. J.EastmanC. I. (2017). Sleep and cognitive performance of African-Americans and European-Americans before and during circadian misalignment produced by an abrupt 9-h delay in the sleep/wake schedule. PLoS ONE12:e0186843. 10.1371/journal.pone.0186843
68
PhillipsC. (2017). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor, depression, and physical activity: making the neuroplastic connection. Neural Plast.2017:7260130. 10.1155/2017/7260130
69
RhyuI. J.BythewayJ. A.KohlerS. J.LangeH.LeeK. J.BoklewskiJ.et al. (2010). Effects of aerobic exercise training on cognitive function and cortical vascularity in monkeys. Neuroscience167, 1239–1248. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.03.003
70
RooksC. R.ThomN. J.McCullyK. K.DishmanR. K. (2010). Effects of incremental exercise on cerebral oxygenation measured by near-infrared spectroscopy: a systematic review. Prog. Neurobiol.92, 134–150. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.06.002
71
SandersA. F.LamersJ. M. (2002). The Eriksen flanker effect revisited. Acta Psychol.109, 41–56. 10.1016/S0001-6918(01)00048-8
72
SandersonS.TattI. D.HigginsJ. P. (2007). Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. Int. J. Epidemiol.36, 666–676. 10.1093/ije/dym018
73
SeifertT.FisherJ. P.YoungC. N.HartwichD.OgohS.RavenP. B.et al. (2010). Glycopyrrolate abolishes the exercise-induced increase in cerebral perfusion in humans. Exp. Physiol.95, 1016–1025. 10.1113/expphysiol.2010.054346
74
SlimK.NiniE.ForestierD.KwiatkowskiF.PanisY.ChipponiJ. (2003). Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J. Surg.73, 712–716. 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x
75
StinsJ. F.PoldermanJ. C. T.BoomsmaD. I.de GeusE. J. C. (2007). Conditional accuracy in response interference tasks: evidence from the eriksen flanker task and the spatial conflict task. Adv. Cogn. Psychol.3, 409–417. 10.2478/v10053-008-0005-4
76
StoetG. (2017). Sex differences in the Simon task help to interpret sex differences in selective attention. Psychol. Res.81, 571–581. 10.1007/s00426-016-0763-4
77
SwainR. A.BerggrenK. L.KerrA. L.PatelA.PeplinskiC.SikorskiA. M. (2012). On aerobic exercise and behavioral and neural plasticity. Brain Sci.2, 709–744. 10.3390/brainsci2040709
78
SwatridgeK.ReganK.StainesW. R.RoyE.MiddletonL. E. (2017). The acute effects of aerobic exercise on cognitive control among people with Chronic Stroke. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis.26, 2742–2748. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.06.050
79
TrincheroM. F.ButtnerK. A.Sulkes CuevasJ. N.TempranaS. G.FontanetP. A.Monzón-SalinasM. C.et al. (2017). High plasticity of new granule cells in the aging Hippocampus. Cell Rep.21, 1129–1139. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.064
80
TsaiC.-L.ChenF.-C.PanC.-Y.TsengY.-T. (2016). The neurocognitive performance of visuospatial attention in children with obesity. Front. Psychol.7:1033. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01033
81
TsaiC. L.ChenF. C.PanC. Y.WangC. H.HuangT. H.ChenT. C. (2014). Impact of acute aerobic exercise and cardiorespiratory fitness on visuospatial attention performance and serum BDNF levels. Psychoneuroendocrinology41, 121–131. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.12.014
82
TsoiK. K.ChanJ. Y.HiraiH. W.WongS. Y.KwokT. C. (2015). Cognitive tests to detect dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern. Med.175, 1450–1458. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2152
83
TuckerA. M.SternY. (2011). Cognitive reserve in aging. Curr. Alzheimer Res.8, 354–360. 10.2174/156720511795745320
84
TylerW. J.Pozzo-MillerL. (2003). Miniature synaptic transmission and BDNF modulate dendritic spine growth and form in rat CA1 neurones. J. Physiol.553(Pt 2), 497–509. 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.052639
85
van den BergV.SaliasiE.de GrootR. H.JollesJ.ChinapawM. J.SinghA. S. (2016). Physical activity in the school setting: cognitive performance is not affected by three different types of acute exercise. Front. Psychol.7:723. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00723
86
van EdeF.de LangeF. P.MarisE. (2012). Attentional cues affect accuracy and reaction time via different cognitive and neural processes. J. Neurosci.32, 10408–10412. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1337-12.2012
87
van HallG.StromstadM.RasmussenP.JansO.ZaarM.GamC.et al. (2009). Blood lactate is an important energy source for the human brain. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.29, 1121–1129. 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.35
88
VaynmanS.YingZ.Gomez-PinillaF. (2004). Hippocampal BDNF mediates the efficacy of exercise on synaptic plasticity and cognition. Eur. J. Neurosci.20, 2580–2590. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03720.x
89
VincentA. S.Roebuck-SpencerT. M.Cox-FuenzalidaL. E.BlockC.ScottJ. G.KaneR. (2017). Validation of ANAM for cognitive screening in a mixed clinical sample. Appl. Neuropsychol. Adult25, 366–375. 10.1080/23279095.2017.1314967
90
VossM. W.NagamatsuL. S.Liu-AmbroseT.KramerA. F. (2011). Exercise, brain, and cognition across the life span. J. Appl. Physiol.111, 1505–1513. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00210.2011
91
XieS. S.GoldsteinC. M.GathrightE. C.GunstadJ.DolanskyM. A.RedleJ.et al. (2015). Performance of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) in detecting cognitive impairment in heart failure patients. Heart Lung J. Crit. Care44, 387–394. 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2015.07.002
92
YeomC.-W.ParkY.-J.ChoiS.-W.BhangS.-Y. (2016). Association of peripheral BDNF level with cognition, attention and behavior in preschool children. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry Ment. Health10:10. 10.1186/s13034-016-0097-4
93
ZeischkaP.DeroostN.HenderickxD.SoetensE. (2010). Testing the attention shift hypothesis as an account for the flanker sequence-based congruency modulation in spatial flanker tasks. Am. J. Psychol.123, 337–351. 10.5406/amerjpsyc.123.3.0337
Summary
Keywords
moderate physical exercise, cognition, reaction time, physical activity, physical exercise
Citation
Fernandes RM, Correa MG, dos Santos MAR, Almeida APCPSC, Fagundes NCF, Maia LC and Lima RR (2018) The Effects of Moderate Physical Exercise on Adult Cognition: A Systematic Review. Front. Physiol. 9:667. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00667
Received
05 December 2017
Accepted
14 May 2018
Published
08 June 2018
Volume
9 - 2018
Edited by
Billy Sperlich, Universität Würzburg, Germany
Reviewed by
Giovanni Messina, University of Foggia, Italy; Henning Bay Nielsen, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Updates
Copyright
© 2018 Fernandes, Correa, dos Santos, Almeida, Fagundes, Maia and Lima.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Rafael R. Lima rafalima@ufpa.br
This article was submitted to Exercise Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology
†These authors have contributed equally to this work.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.