Biomimetic extracellular matrix mediated somatic stem cell differentiation: applications in dental pulp tissue regeneration

Dental caries is one of the most widely prevalent infectious diseases in the world. It affects more than half of the world's population. The current treatment for necrotic dental pulp tissue arising from dental caries is root canal therapy. This treatment results in loss of tooth sensitivity and vitality making it prone for secondary infections. Over the past decade, several tissue-engineering approaches have attempted regeneration of the dental pulp tissue. Although several studies have highlighted the potential of dental stem cells, none have transitioned into a clinical setting owing to limited availability of dental stem cells and the need for growth factor delivery systems. Our strategy is to utilize the intact ECM of pulp cells to drive lineage specific differentiation of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells. From a clinical perspective, pulp ECM scaffolds can be generated using cell lines and patient specific somatic stem cells can be used for regeneration. Our published results have shown the feasibility of using pulp ECM scaffolds for odontogenic differentiation of non-dental mesenchymal cells. This focused review discusses the issues surrounding dental pulp tissue regeneration and the potential of our strategy to overcome these issues.

Introduction

Tissue engineering of dental and craniofacial tissues has gained enormous prominence in the past decade. In spite of these advances, clinical translation has remained elusive. One of the primary reasons lies in the specialized nature of dental tissue cell types and the limited availability of somatic stem cells that can be used to regenerate these tissues.

As proposed more than two decades ago by Langer and Vacanti, tissue engineering requires a triad of cells, scaffolds and growth factors (Langer and Vacanti, 1993). However, the approach toward maximizing the potential of this triad has been evolving consistently. In this focused review, we will discuss our biomimetic approach aimed at regeneration of dental pulp tissue. Additionally, we will also discuss the potential of this technology for regeneration of other tissues.

Dental Caries and Pulp Tissue

Dental caries is one of the most prevalent infectious disease in the world second only to the common cold (Islam et al., 2007). In the United States, it is the most widely prevalent infectious disease. A world health organization (WHO) report states that approximately 90% of the world's population has experienced dental caries. Poor oral hygiene is the primary cause for caries. However, several medical treatments such as radiation therapy and chemotherapy can also cause caries. Additionally, the use of drugs that negatively affect salivation can also result in caries. The disease is characterized by bacterial infection of the teeth. The pathogenic bacteria generate an acidic environment that slowly degrades the enamel and dentin hydroxyapatite and eventually exposes the dental pulp tissue for infection. Dental caries in its advanced stage is characterized by infected necrotic dental pulp tissue.

The dental pulp tissue is a highly vascularized and innervated specialized soft tissue that provides vitality to the tooth. The functions of dental pulp tissue range from response to bacterial insult and injury to transmission of mechanical stimuli and promotion of regeneration. However, the tissue itself possesses limited regenerative potential due to its anatomical arrangement and the specialized nature of dental pulp and odontoblast cells.

KEY CONCEPT 1. Dental pulp and caries
Dental pulp is a highly vascularized and innervated soft tissue that fills the root canal space. This soft tissue provides vitality to the tooth by serving as a mechano transducer of physical stimulus, by providing regenerative ability to form reparative dentin resulting from minor insult or injury and also by providing immediate response to bacterial insult. Dental caries is caused by bacterial infection of the dental pulp tissue leading to necrotic pulp tissue. It occurs primarily due to lack of oral hygiene, but can also be a result of several medical treatments such as chemotherapy.

Root Canal Therapy

The current treatment for infected necrotic pulp is root canal therapy. Root canal therapy involves removal of the infected pulp tissue, disinfection of the pulp chamber, and filling of the chamber with gutta percha, a synthetic compound devoid of ability to support or promote regeneration of living tissue. As a result, the tooth loses its sensitivity and vitality and becomes a dead tooth. Therefore, teeth subjected to root canal therapy cannot respond immunologically to subsequent infections. Although the root canal space is disinfected prior to therapy, as a result of immunological inertness, subsequent secondary infections arising due to lack of oral hygiene or other continuing causes may go unnoticed until they spread to neighboring tissues resulting in a chronic condition that significantly affects the quality of life. In some rare cases, this might lead to loss of life as a result of sepsis.

KEY CONCEPT 2. Root canal therapy
This is the current treatment for necrotic pulp tissue. This treatment is characterized by removal of the necrotic pulp tissue, disinfection of the root canal space and filling up the pulp chamber with an inorganic compound followed by capping.

In children and adolescents with immature permanent teeth, root canal therapy poses an even greater problem by preventing root maturation. The result is loos of tooth due to cervical root fracture. This type of failure is the leading cause for treatment failure in immature teeth (Cvek, 1992). In order to preserve the vitality of the tooth in adults and to promote normal root maturation and longevity of immature permanent teeth in children, a regenerative strategy is required as a replacement for root canal therapy.

Current Approaches to Dental Pulp Tissue Regeneration

The drawbacks of root canal therapy in adults and children can be overcome if regeneration of functional pulp tissue can be accomplished clinically. An appropriate stem cell source is required to accomplish this task successfully. Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) are currently the preferred cell type for dental pulp tissue regeneration. DPSCs are mesenchymal stem cells that reside within the pulp tissue and are capable of multi-lineage differentiation (Shi et al., 2001; Shi and Gronthos, 2003; Kerkis et al., 2006; Huang et al., 2009). Other stem cell sources for pulp tissue engineering include stem cells from exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED), stem cells from apical papilla (SCAP), and periodontal ligament derived stem cells (PDLSCs).

Dental pulp tissue engineering has been investigated in vivo in small animal models using DPSCs (Gronthos et al., 2002; Demarco et al., 2010; Karaoz et al., 2011), SHED (Cordeiro et al., 2008; Rosa et al., 2013), SCAP (Huang et al., 2010), and PDLSCs (Ravindran et al., 2014a, 2012b) and a variety of growth factors that includes fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) (Morito et al., 2009) and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) (Nakashima, 1994; Nakashima and Reddi, 2003).

Recently, dental pulp tissue engineering was attempted in a canine pulpectomy model in mature (Iohara et al., 2011) and immature teeth (Wang et al., 2013). The studies were performed using a side population of DPSCs (CD105 +ve cells) and stromal derived factor 1 (SDF1) was used as the growth factor of choice to induce functional pulp tissue regeneration including vascularization and innervation. Additionally, DPSCs when used in conjunction with granulocyte stimulating factor (GSF) to isolate a side population of cells exhibiting higher mobility, showed an improved regenerative potential. Additionally, no change was observed in regenerative potential with cells isolated from aged dogs or regeneration in aged dogs in general when this combination was used (Iohara et al., 2013; Nakashima and Iohara, 2014). However, the caveat, as acknowledged by the authors, is that the clinical translation of the research is limited by the availability of viable autologous dental pulps.

Additionally, DPSCs have also been used to regenerate bone. Recent studies in human graft models show the potential of autologous DPSCs to regenerate bone in a clinical setting. This study provides a valuable insight into the use of DPSCs clinically (D'aquino et al., 2009).

Limitations of Dental Stem Cells

Dental stem cells are the ideal cell types for regeneration of dental tissues. However, the primary drawback associated with all of the dental stem cells mentioned above is their limited availability (Feng and Lengner, 2013). The easiest and most accessible way of isolating DPSCs is from the extracted third molars of patients (Tirino et al., 2012). However, in many cases, the third molars are infected or removed as a result of caries. Additionally, the number of cells obtained will not be sufficient to treat multiple carious teeth or to treat any teeth that may be infected in the future. On the other hand, DPSCs are also available for isolation from the inflamed pulp tissues (Alongi et al., 2010). These cells possess similar potential compared to DPSCs from natural pulp, albeit slightly altered stem cell characteristics. If successful, this technique can prove to be quite valuable. However, the success depends on the quality of the inflamed pulp and also the amount of cells that can be isolated from it.

SHED are stem cells that need to be isolated from deciduous teeth. However, their effectiveness in clinical therapy is heavily dependent upon development of reliable stem cell banking technologies. Even if such technologies are developed the procedure may not be cost effective for most of the population as a viable option for treatment of caries. Moreover, as the cells need to be autologous, a majority of the current adult population will not be able to avail the benefits of this technology.

Finally, SCAP are stem cells that are isolated from developing teeth. Therefore, it is highly improbable that they can serve as viable source for stem cells from a clinical perspective.

Limitations of Growth Factor Delivery Systems

Current approaches to pulp tissue engineering and regenerative medicine in general focus on the use of growth factor delivery systems to deliver one or more growth factors to induce lineage specific differentiation of stem cells. Several natural and polymeric growth factor delivery systems have been developed for controlled delivery of growth factors (Vo et al., 2012). However, the timing of delivery, long-term stability and dosage of these growth factors limit the translational potential severely. Another important consideration is that in vivo, the stem cells use several different growth factors at different stages of differentiation and in unique combinations to achieve and maintain lineage specific differentiation. Therefore, it is not realistic to expect that a single growth factor or a handful of growth factors can generate the same effect as the complete extracellular environment that the cells perceive in vivo.

Alternative Stem Cell Sources

With the limited availability of dental stem cells, the need for exploring other stem cell sources for clinical translation is high. Published studies have shown that stem cells isolated from the bone marrow, adipose tissue, and placenta have similar epigenetic profiles (Aranda et al., 2009). However, in one study that compared bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSCs) for pulp tissue regeneration in a canine model, BMSCs were not as potent as DPSCs or ADMSCs (Ishizaka et al., 2012). This study required the use of growth factor delivery (SDF1) and a side population of CD31(−) cells. From a translational perspective, the safety and dosage of SDF1 has not been established and to obtain side populations of autologous stem cells is difficult. Therefore, an efficient system that can direct lineage specific differentiation of alternate stem cell sources that does not rely on growth factor delivery is required.

The bone marrow is self-renewing and BMSCs have clinically standardized isolation procedures and are relatively easy to obtain compared to other stem cell sources. Although not ideal for pulp tissue regeneration using conventional approaches, translational feasibility is highest for BMSCs as opposed to dental stem cells. Both DPSCs and BMSCs are of mesenchymal origin. DPSCs are derived from the neural crest and BMSCs from the bone marrow. This fundamental difference in these two stem cell types results in different behavioral characteristics (Shi et al., 2001; Yu et al., 2007). However, if provided with appropriate extracellular environment, our results indicate that BMSCs can undergo odontogenic differentiation.

Another important consideration is the ability of BMSCs to confer an innate ability to defend against infection. Several published reports highlight the roles and importance of BMSCs in modulating the maintenance and migration of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and monocyte emigration (Mendez-Ferrer et al., 2010; Ehninger and Trumpp, 2011; Shi et al., 2011). As a direct role-player in action against infection, BMSCs can actively prolong survival during sepsis, reduce microbial growth, and burden post infection (Nemeth et al., 2009; Krasnodembskaya et al., 2010; Mei et al., 2010; Meisel et al., 2011). Considering these factors, BMSCs form the ideal source for clinically relevant pulp tissue regeneration.

The Extracellular Matrix (ECM)

Living organisms are made up of tissues that consist of live cells embedded within an ECM. The ECM constitutes framework of structural and functional proteins within which cells reside in vivo (Ravindran and George, 2014). The ECM dictates and defines tissue/organ architecture, shape, and functionality. The ECM is unique for each cell type and consists of a combination of structural and functional proteins in well-defined proportions. The exact composition of the ECM of each cell type still remains elusive. Recent proteomic studies have shown that the ECM of is comprised of thousands of proteins ranging from structural proteins and growth factors to even transcription factors (Alves et al., 2011). Several proteins believed to be intracellular in nature are being discovered in the ECM possessing important extracellular roles (Ravindran and George, 2014). We have identified two such proteins namely; glucose regulated protein 78 (GRP78) (Ravindran et al., 2012a) and TGFβ receptor interacting protein 1 (TRIP1) (Ramachandran et al., 2012) that possess extracellular roles apart from their well-characterized intracellular functions.

KEY CONCEPT 3. Extracellular matrix (ECM)
The ECM is the cell-secreted environment within which cells are embedded. The ECM and cells together constitute a tissue. Several tissues possess a complex architecture consisting of multiple cell types and their ECM arranged in a defined architecture to coherently perform a function. The three layers of an artery is a simple example. The ECM defines tissue functionality (bone, cartilage etc.) and governs cell behavior, growth, and differentiation.

Considering the nature and complexity of the ECM, present strategies aimed at using a few factors seem inadequate to accomplish and maintain the engineered tissue. Many studies have suggested the use of decellularized tissues as allografts and xenografts (Badylak et al., 2011; Crapo et al., 2011; Sabetkish et al., 2014). However, as the ECM for each cell type is unique, it is not a feasible strategy to use the matrices derived from other decellularized tissues for dental pulp tissue regeneration. On the other hand, decellularized dental pulp tissues can be a viable option if appropriate protocol to obtain them and store them in substantial quantities is available. This can be a daunting task to accomplish. Therefore, the ideal and clinically relevant strategy would be to recreate the dental pulp environment in vitro using an approach that can be transitioned into a mass-producible environment.

Use of Biomimetic Scaffolds

Our approach is focused on creating an environment that mimics the native pulp environment to illicit an appropriate stem cell response and behavior. We have created an ECM based biomimetic scaffold that contains an intact ECM of differentiating dental pulp stem cells (Ravindran et al., 2014b). Ours and other published studies have shown the effectiveness of ECM derived scaffolds for inducing lineage specific differentiation of stem cells for several purposes including bone, cartilage, and vascular tissue(Bourget et al., 2012; Ravindran et al., 2012a; Levorson et al., 2014a). However, our approach to pulp tissue engineering is unique in that we aim to differentiate BMSCs to a pulpal lineage using a pulp-specific ECM scaffold. Our studies show that that this scaffold contains both structural and functional proteins required for pulp tissue regeneration (Figure 1) (Ravindran et al., 2014b).

KEY CONCEPT 4. Biomimetics
With respect to the field of tissue regeneration, biomimetic refers to strategies that aim to mimic the native biological environment. Tissues in the human bodies are extremely complex entities. Their architecture and composition have evolved over millions of years to achieve specific functions. Therefore, attempting to redesign them is a futile effort. The emerging field of biomimetics aims to recreate the natural environment for use in regenerative medicine. In this article, biomimetic refers to the native cell-generated pulp ECM that is incorporated within the collagen/chitosan framework.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Expression of ECM proteins (Ravindran et al., 2014b). (A–P) are representative confocal micrographs showing the expression of various ECM proteins in the ECM scaffold sections. Fibronectin (A) was used as a positive control and tubulin (B) was used as a negative control for intracellular protein. DAPI staining (C) was performed to rule out the presence of DNA material in the ECM scaffold. (D) shows absence of rabbit and mouse non-specific secondary antibody binding. (E–H) show the presence of growth factors BMP2 (bone morphogenetic protein 2), TGFβ1 (transforming growth factor β1), pro angiogenic factor VEGF, and anti angiogenic factor PEDF (pigment epithelium derived factor), respectively. (I,J) show the presence of matrix metalloproteases 2 and 9, respectively. (K,L) show the presence of phosphorylated proteins in the ECM by localizing the presence of phosphorylated serines and tyrosines. (M–P) show the presence of non-collagenous proteins DMP1 (dentin matrix protein 1), thrombospondin, DSP (dentin sialoprotein), and DPP (dentin phosphophoryn). Scale bar represents 20 μm in (C–E, I, J, L). Scale bar represents 10 μm in all other images.

Advantages of Using Our Native ECM Incorporated Biomimetic Scaffold

Collagen and chitosan constitute the base materials of this biomimetic scaffold. These are both naturally occurring biopolymers that have been shown to be biocompatible and biodegradable without causing adverse immune reactions (reviewed in George and Ravindran, 2010). Additionally, chitosan also possesses antimicrobial properties (Kim et al., 2003) that can potentially prevent secondary infections during and after pulp tissue regeneration especially after the native pulp has been under bacterial attack. In combination with the immunomodulatory property of BMSCs, we can expect to have a potent system to actively fight infection.

The ECM itself is secreted by the cells, consists of structural and functional proteins present in the pulp tissue and is incorporated three dimensionally within the collagen/chitosan framework. One of the salient features of the ECM is that it presents a completely engineered pulp environment containing physiologically relevant amounts of growth factors, cytokines, and metalloproteases. Structural proteins such as collagen and fibronectin can sequester the growth factors and present them to the cells in a manner that mimics the biological scenario in vivo.

From a translational perspective, the biomimetic scaffolds can be mass-produced using human pulp cell lines. Published studies have demonstrated the safety of telomerase transfected human cell lines (Nakahara et al., 2009; Bourgine et al., 2014). However, for the generation of ECM incorporated scaffolds, cell lines will only be used to generate the scaffold. Patient specific somatic stem cells (DPSCs if available of BMSCs), can then be used for regeneration. Therefore, there is little chance of oncogenic transformation and a high potential for clinical translation.

The ECM Scaffold Can Trigger the BMSCs to Differentiate toward an Odontogenic Lineage

The ECM scaffolds can initiate and maintain odontogenic differentiation in DPSCs, BMSCs, and PDLSCs without the need for external delivery of growth factors or differentiating agents (Ravindran et al., 2014a). Of the three cell types, BMSCs are best suited for translation into a clinical setting owing to their ready availability and standardized isolation technique. Figure 2 shows the fold change in gene expression of human marrow stromal cells (HMSCs) cultured within the ECM scaffolds with reference to those cultured within control (non-ECM) collagen/chitosan scaffolds. Our published data shows the behavior of DPSCs and PDLSCs in the same environment (Ravindran et al., 2014a). Our results indicate that the three cell types perform differently in similar environments. However, the end result was a pro-odontogenic differentiation as evidenced by positive regulation of the dentin sialo phospho protein (DSPP) gene. Thus, the gene expression profile shows the potential of the pulp ECM scaffolds to direct odontogenic differentiation of BMSCs as well as DPSCs and PDLSCs.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Quantitative real time PCR analysis. The bars represent mean fold change in gene expression by the HMSCs cultured within the pulp ECM scaffolds with respect to HMSCs cultured within control collagen/chitosan scaffolds. The experiments were performed in quadruplicates. The error bars represent standard deviation. The statistical significance was calculated using student's t-test. *Represents significant change with P < 0.05.

The potential of the pulp ECM scaffolds were also evaluated in vivo. When implanted subcutaneously in immunocompromiced mice, the biomimetic ECM scaffolds triggered odontogenic differentiation of DPSCs, PDLSCs, and BMSCs (Ravindran et al., 2014a). Figure 3 shows odontogenic differentiation of BMSCs in vivo. BMSCs expressed the marker proteins DSP and DPP suggesting positive differentiation toward the odontogenic lineage. These experiments showed clearly that the BMSCs possess the potential for odontogenic differentiation if they are provided with an appropriate extracellular environment. Additionally, the experiments also showed that the pulp ECM incorporated scaffolds, can trigger odontogenic differentiation of different types of mesenchymal stem cells and that all the cell types do not follow similar pathways to achieve lineage specific differentiation.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Fluorescence Immunohistochemistry. The fluorescent images are representative confocal micrographs of sections from HMSC seeded scaffold explants consisting of control collagen/chitosan scaffold (A) and pulp ECM scaffold (B). The sections were analyzed for the expression of DMP1 (A1,B1), DSP (A2,B2), DPP (A3,B3), and VEGF (A4,B4). Note the absence of DSP and DPP signal in (A) (control scaffolds containing HMSCs). White arrows in (B) point to positive staining of the same by HMSCs seeded within the pulp ECM scaffold. Yellow arrows in (B3) point to non-specific fluorescence from red blood corpuscles (RBCs). The presence of RBCs also indicate the presence of active capillaries. Note the increase in DMP1 (comparing images A1 and B1) and VEGF (comparing images A4 and B4) expression. The secondary antibody control for rabbit and mouse secondary antibodies did not show any staining (C). The imaging conditions were maintained constant. The scale bar represents 20 μm in all images.

The Biomimetic ECM Scaffolds can Trigger Vascularization in vivo

The data presented in Figure 1 shows that the ECM scaffolds, amongst other proteins, contains pro-vascular growth factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). When these scaffolds were implanted subcutaneously in nude mice, they showed more robust vascularization compared to control scaffolds indicating their ability to promote vascularization (Figure 4). The data presented in the figure show that the ECM scaffolds promote vascularization in the presence of both DPSCs and BMSCs. Our published results show vascularization in the presence of DPSCs, BMSCs, and PDLSCs (Ravindran et al., 2014a). The images in Figure 4 show the presence of endothelial cells that stained positive for von Willebrand factor. Note the presence of capillary-like structures in the ECM scaffold containing BMSCs.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. von Willebrand factor (VWF) immunohistochemistry. The micrographs are representative images of VWF stained explant sections containing DPSCs (A1,A2) and HMSCs (B1,B2) in control and pulp ECM scaffolds. The arrows in the images point to positively stained endothelial cells (black arrows). Note the absence of endothelial cells in the control scaffolds containing both DPSCs (A1) and HMSCs (B1). The scale bar in all the images represents 20 μm.

One of the primary challenges associated with dental pulp tissue engineering is vascularization of the tissue. The apex of the root canal space is small. It is also the only opening through which the tissue can be vascularized. It is imperative that any tissue engineering technology that attempts to regenerate the dental pulp is pro-vascular in nature. Therefore, the ability of the biomimetic ECM scaffolds to induce vascularization will be highly beneficial toward clinical translation of this approach to pulp tissue regeneration.

Implications of this Biomimetic Technology on Other Fields of Tissue Engineering

In this review, we have discussed the uniqueness of cell type—specific ECM. The generation of biomimetic scaffolds is therefore not limited to dental pulp tissue regeneration. It can be applied toward all fields of tissue engineering. Other groups and us have tested this strategy for regeneration of bone (Thibault et al., 2010; Ravindran et al., 2012a). Recently, similar strategies have been attempted for generating ECM incorporated scaffolds for cartilage tissue regeneration (Levorson et al., 2014a,b). Apart from being used for generating new biomaterials, this strategy can also be used to improve the properties of existing clinical materials. We are presently, working on improving the bioactivity and regenerative capacity of existing clinical materials such as demineralized bone matrices (DBM) using this technology. Additionally, we are also focusing on generation of platforms to aid transplantation surgery (such as biomimetic platforms to enable vascularization for islet transplantation). We envision that in the near future, several medical devices and biomaterials that are currently in use and biologically inert, can be improved using this biomimetic approach.

Conclusion and Future Direction

In this focused review, we have discussed the challenges facing clinical translation of dental pulp tissue engineering approaches. We believe that the limited availability of dental stem cells and the limitations of growth factor delivery systems and dosage complications severely hamper the potential of current approaches. Our experiments have demonstrated that it is possible to overcome these hurdles by using biomimetically engineered pulp ECM incorporated scaffolds that we have developed. These scaffolds possess the ability to trigger lineage specific differentiation of several mesenchymal stem cell types in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, dental stem cells can be avoided if appropriate sources are not available. On the other hand our experiments also show that these scaffolds contain an array of lineage specific proteins that include both structural and functional proteins in physiologically relevant quantities. Therefore, the use of these scaffolds will overcome the need for using complex growth factor delivery systems.

Although the results are promising, several factors need to be standardized before this technology can be ready for clinical translation. To achieve mass-production and minimal batch variability, the ECM incorporated scaffolds need to be produced using dental stem cell lines. Standardized tests need to be developed to assess the quality of the scaffolds and to quantitatively evaluate the levels of different growth factors and ECM proteins within the scaffolds. These tests will ensure product reliability and minimum performance thresholds. Our current research is focused on two objectives: The first objective is to test the effectiveness of these biomimetic scaffolds in a large animal pulpectomy model to evaluate vascularization, innervation, and overall complete regeneration of intact pulp tissue. The second objective that we are working on is to standardize their potential for mass production using dental pulp stem cell lines and bioreactors. We envision that if we are able to accomplish both of these objectives, these biomimetic ECM scaffolds have immense potential to successfully replace root canal therapy with a regenerative therapy that will maintain tooth vitality, functionality, and longevity. Results from these studies will serve as a proof of concept for application to other fields of regenerative medicine.

Overall, our goal is to enhance the translational potential of tissue-engineering strategies by eliminating the need for growth factor delivery systems and sub population of stem cells that have limited availability. This biomimetic technology is a step in this direction.

Author Contributions

SR: First author and corresponding author. Conceptualized, planned, and performed the experiments referenced in this manuscript and wrote the manuscript. AG: Second author. Was involved in conceptualization and planning. Contributed toward editing and proofreading the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge funding for this study from NIH Grant DE023806 to SR and NIH Grant DE 19633 to AG and the Brodie Endowment Fund.

Author Biography

Sriram Ravindran, I earned my bachelor's degree in Chemical Engineering from The University of Madras and my PhD in Bioengineering from the University of Illinois at Chicago. My doctoral work focused on the role of endothelial cells and their ECM on contact system proteases. Subsequently, my postdoctoral training was focused on studying the multiple and varied roles of non-collagenous proteins in the bone and dentin matrices. My fascination with the uniqueness and complexity of the ECM and my passion to develop strategies for clinically relevant tissue engineering led to the development my current research projects. The focus of my Laboratory is to develop biomimetic strategies for tissue regeneration using somatic stem cells. More specifically, we design 3D scaffolds and modify existing clinical materials by incorporating a native tissue specific intact ECM on or within them depending on the type and application. Our overall goal is to develop these biomimetic techniques for mass-production and clinical use. Our research currently evaluates these strategies for dental pulp, bone and cartilage tissue regeneration and also for islet transplantation. Our work is funded by the NIH and also intramurally by The University of Illinois at Chicago

References

Alongi, D. J., Yamaza, T., Song, Y., Fouad, A. F., Romberg, E. E., Shi, S., et al. (2010). Stem/progenitor cells from inflamed human dental pulp retain tissue regeneration potential. Regen. Med. 5, 617–631. doi: 10.2217/rme.10.30

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alves, R. D., Demmers, J. A., Bezstarosti, K., Van Der Eerden, B. C., Verhaar, J. A., Eijken, M., et al. (2011). Unraveling the human bone microenvironment beyond the classical extracellular matrix proteins: a human bone protein library. J. Proteome Res. 10, 4725–4733. doi: 10.1021/pr200522n

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aranda, P., Agirre, X., Ballestar, E., Andreu, E. J., Roman-Gomez, J., Prieto, I., et al. (2009). Epigenetic signatures associated with different levels of differentiation potential in human stem cells. PLoS ONE 4:e7809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007809

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Badylak, S. F., Taylor, D., and Uygun, K. (2011). Whole-organ tissue engineering: decellularization and recellularization of three-dimensional matrix scaffolds. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 13, 27–53. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071910-124743

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bourget, J. M., Gauvin, R., Larouche, D., Lavoie, A., Labbe, R., Auger, F. A., et al. (2012). Human fibroblast-derived ECM as a scaffold for vascular tissue engineering. Biomaterials 33, 9205–9213. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.015

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bourgine, P., Le Magnen, C., Pigeot, S., Geurts, J., Scherberich, A., and Martin, I. (2014). Combination of immortalization and inducible death strategies to generate a human mesenchymal stromal cell line with controlled survival. Stem Cell Res. 12, 584–598. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2013.12.006

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cordeiro, M. M., Dong, Z., Kaneko, T., Zhang, Z., Miyazawa, M., Shi, S., et al. (2008). Dental pulp tissue engineering with stem cells from exfoliated deciduous teeth. J. Endod. 34, 962–969. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.04.009

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Crapo, P. M., Gilbert, T. W., and Badylak, S. F. (2011). An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes. Biomaterials 32, 3233–3243. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.057

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cvek, M. (1992). Prognosis of luxated non-vital maxillary incisors treated with calcium hydroxide and filled with gutta-percha. A retrospective clinical study. Endod. Dent. Traumatol. 8, 45–55.

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | Google Scholar

D'aquino, R., De Rosa, A., Lanza, V., Tirino, V., Laino, L., Graziano, A., et al. (2009). Human mandible bone defect repair by the grafting of dental pulp stem/progenitor cells and collagen sponge biocomplexes. Eur. Cell. Mater. 18, 75–83.

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | Google Scholar

Demarco, F. F., Casagrande, L., Zhang, Z., Dong, Z., Tarquinio, S. B., Zeitlin, B. D., et al. (2010). Effects of morphogen and scaffold porogen on the differentiation of dental pulp stem cells. J. Endod. 36, 1805–1811. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.031

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ehninger, A., and Trumpp, A. (2011). The bone marrow stem cell niche grows up: mesenchymal stem cells and macrophages move in. J. Exp. Med. 208, 421–428. doi: 10.1084/jem.20110132

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Feng, R., and Lengner, C. (2013). Application of stem cell technology in dental regenerative medicine. Adv Wound Care 2, 296–305. doi: 10.1089/wound.2012.0375

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

George, A., and Ravindran, S. (2010). Protein templates in hard tissue engineering. Nano Today 5, 254–266. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2010.05.005

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gronthos, S., Brahim, J., Li, W., Fisher, L. W., Cherman, N., Boyde, A., et al. (2002). Stem cell properties of human dental pulp stem cells. J. Dent. Res. 81, 531–535. doi: 10.1177/154405910208100806

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, G. T., Gronthos, S., and Shi, S. (2009). Mesenchymal stem cells derived from dental tissues vs. those from other sources: their biology and role in regenerative medicine. J. Dent. Res. 88, 792–806. doi: 10.1177/0022034509340867

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, G. T., Yamaza, T., Shea, L. D., Djouad, F., Kuhn, N. Z., Tuan, R. S., et al. (2010). Stem/progenitor cell-mediated de novo regeneration of dental pulp with newly deposited continuous layer of dentin in an in vivo model. Tissue Eng. Part A 16, 605–615. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2009.0518

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Iohara, K., Imabayashi, K., Ishizaka, R., Watanabe, A., Nabekura, J., Ito, M., et al. (2011). Complete pulp regeneration after pulpectomy by transplantation of CD105+ stem cells with stromal cell-derived factor-1. Tissue Eng. Part A 17, 1911–1920. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0615

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Iohara, K., Murakami, M., Takeuchi, N., Osako, Y., Ito, M., Ishizaka, R., et al. (2013). A novel combinatorial therapy with pulp stem cells and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for total pulp regeneration. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2, 521–533. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2012-0132

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ishizaka, R., Iohara, K., Murakami, M., Fukuta, O., and Nakashima, M. (2012). Regeneration of dental pulp following pulpectomy by fractionated stem/progenitor cells from bone marrow and adipose tissue. Biomaterials 33, 2109–2118. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.11.056

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Islam, B., Khan, S. N., and Khan, A. U. (2007). Dental caries: from infection to prevention. Med. Sci. Monit. 13, RA196–RA203.

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | Google Scholar

Karaoz, E., Demircan, P. C., Saglam, O., Aksoy, A., Kaymaz, F., and Duruksu, G. (2011). Human dental pulp stem cells demonstrate better neural and epithelial stem cell properties than bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Histochem. Cell Biol. 136, 455–473. doi: 10.1007/s00418-011-0858-3

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kerkis, I., Kerkis, A., Dozortsev, D., Stukart-Parsons, G. C., Gomes Massironi, S. M., Pereira, L. V., et al. (2006). Isolation and characterization of a population of immature dental pulp stem cells expressing OCT-4 and other embryonic stem cell markers. Cells Tissues Organs 184, 105–116. doi: 10.1159/000099617

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, K. W., Thomas, R. L., Lee, C., and Park, H. J. (2003). Antimicrobial activity of native chitosan, degraded chitosan, and O-carboxymethylated chitosan. J. Food Prot. 66, 1495–1498.

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | Google Scholar

Krasnodembskaya, A., Song, Y., Fang, X., Gupta, N., Serikov, V., Lee, J. W., et al. (2010). Antibacterial effect of human mesenchymal stem cells is mediated in part from secretion of the antimicrobial peptide LL-37. Stem Cells 28, 2229–2238. doi: 10.1002/stem.544

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Langer, R., and Vacanti, J. P. (1993). Tissue engineering. Science 260, 920–926.

PubMed Abstract | Full Text

Levorson, E. J., Hu, O., Mountziaris, P. M., Kasper, F. K., and Mikos, A. G. (2014a). Cell-derived polymer/extracellular matrix composite scaffolds for cartilage regeneration, Part 2: construct devitalization and determination of chondroinductive capacity. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 20, 358–372. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2013.0288

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Levorson, E. J., Mountziaris, P. M., Hu, O., Kasper, F. K., and Mikos, A. G. (2014b). Cell-derived polymer/extracellular matrix composite scaffolds for cartilage regeneration, Part 1: investigation of cocultures and seeding densities for improved extracellular matrix deposition. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 20, 340–357. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2013.0286

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mei, S. H., Haitsma, J. J., Dos Santos, C. C., Deng, Y., Lai, P. F., Slutsky, A. S., et al. (2010). Mesenchymal stem cells reduce inflammation while enhancing bacterial clearance and improving survival in sepsis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 182, 1047–1057. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201001-0010OC

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meisel, R., Brockers, S., Heseler, K., Degistirici, O., Bulle, H., Woite, C., et al. (2011). Human but not murine multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells exhibit broad-spectrum antimicrobial effector function mediated by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase. Leukemia 25, 648–654. doi: 10.1038/leu.2010.310

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mendez-Ferrer, S., Michurina, T. V., Ferraro, F., Mazloom, A. R., Macarthur, B. D., Lira, S. A., et al. (2010). Mesenchymal and haematopoietic stem cells form a unique bone marrow niche. Nature 466, 829–834. doi: 10.1038/nature09262

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Morito, A., Kida, Y., Suzuki, K., Inoue, K., Kuroda, N., Gomi, K., et al. (2009). Effects of basic fibroblast growth factor on the development of the stem cell properties of human dental pulp cells. Arch. Histol. Cytol. 72, 51–64. doi: 10.1679/aohc.72.51

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nakahara, H., Misawa, H., Hayashi, T., Kondo, E., Yuasa, T., Kubota, Y., et al. (2009). Bone repair by transplantation of hTERT-immortalized human mesenchymal stem cells in mice. Transplantation 88, 346–353. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ae5ba2

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nakashima, M. (1994). Induction of dentine in amputated pulp of dogs by recombinant human bone morphogenetic proteins-2 and -4 with collagen matrix. Arch. Oral Biol. 39, 1085–1089.

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | Google Scholar

Nakashima, M., and Iohara, K. (2014). Mobilized dental pulp stem cells for pulp regeneration: initiation of clinical trial. J. Endod. 40, S26–S32. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.01.020

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nakashima, M., and Reddi, A. H. (2003). The application of bone morphogenetic proteins to dental tissue engineering. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 1025–1032. doi: 10.1038/nbt864

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nemeth, K., Leelahavanichkul, A., Yuen, P. S., Mayer, B., Parmelee, A., Doi, K., et al. (2009). Bone marrow stromal cells attenuate sepsis via prostaglandin E(2)-dependent reprogramming of host macrophages to increase their interleukin-10 production. Nat. Med. 15, 42–49. doi: 10.1038/nm.1905

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ramachandran, A., Ravindran, S., and George, A. (2012). Localization of transforming growth factor beta receptor II interacting protein-1 in bone and teeth: implications in matrix mineralization. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 60, 323–337. doi: 10.1369/0022155412436879

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ravindran, S., Gao, Q., Kotecha, M., Magin, R. L., Karol, S., Bedran-Russo, A., et al. (2012a). Biomimetic extracellular matrix-incorporated scaffold induces osteogenic gene expression in human marrow stromal cells. Tissue Eng. Part A 18, 295–309. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2011.0136

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ravindran, S., Gao, Q., Ramachandran, A., Sundivakkam, P., Tiruppathi, C., and George, A. (2012b). Expression and distribution of grp-78/bip in mineralizing tissues and mesenchymal cells. Histochem. Cell Biol. 138, 113–125. doi: 10.1007/s00418-012-0952-1

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ravindran, S., and George, A. (2014). Multifunctional ECM proteins in bone and teeth. Exp. Cell Res. 325, 148–154. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.01.018

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ravindran, S., Huang, C.-C., and George, A. (2014a). Extracellular matrix of dental pulp stem cells: applications in pulp tissue engineering using somatic MSCs. Front. Physiol. 4:395. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00395

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ravindran, S., Zhang, Y., Huang, C. C., and George, A. (2014b). Odontogenic induction of dental stem cells by extracellular matrix-inspired three-dimensional scaffold. Tissue Eng. Part A 20, 92–102. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2013.0192

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rosa, V., Zhang, Z., Grande, R. H., and Nor, J. E. (2013). Dental pulp tissue engineering in full-length human root canals. J. Dent. Res. 92, 970–975. doi: 10.1177/0022034513505772

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sabetkish, S., Kajbafzadeh, A. M., Sabetkish, N., Khorramirouz, R., Akbarzadeh, A., Seyedian, S. L., et al. (2014). Whole-organ tissue engineering: decellularization and recellularization of three-dimensional matrix liver scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 103, 1498–1508. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35291

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, C., Jia, T., Mendez-Ferrer, S., Hohl, T. M., Serbina, N. V., Lipuma, L., et al. (2011). Bone marrow mesenchymal stem and progenitor cells induce monocyte emigration in response to circulating toll-like receptor ligands. Immunity 34, 590–601. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.02.016

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, S., and Gronthos, S. (2003). Perivascular niche of postnatal mesenchymal stem cells in human bone marrow and dental pulp. J. Bone Miner. Res. 18, 696–704. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.4.696

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, S., Robey, P. G., and Gronthos, S. (2001). Comparison of human dental pulp and bone marrow stromal stem cells by cDNA microarray analysis. Bone 29, 532–539. doi: 10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00612-3

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thibault, R. A., Scott Baggett, L., Mikos, A. G., and Kasper, F. K. (2010). Osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells on pregenerated extracellular matrix scaffolds in the absence of osteogenic cell culture supplements. Tissue Eng. Part A 16, 431–440. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2009.0583

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tirino, V., Paino, F., De Rosa, A., and Papaccio, G. (2012). Identification, isolation, characterization, and banking of human dental pulp stem cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 879, 443–463. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-815-3_26

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vo, T. N., Kasper, F. K., and Mikos, A. G. (2012). Strategies for controlled delivery of growth factors and cells for bone regeneration. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 64, 1292–1309. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.01.016

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Zhao, Y., Jia, W., Yang, J., and Ge, L. (2013). Preliminary study on dental pulp stem cell-mediated pulp regeneration in canine immature permanent teeth. J. Endod. 39, 195–201. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.10.002

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, J., Wang, Y., Deng, Z., Tang, L., Li, Y., Shi, J., et al. (2007). Odontogenic capability: bone marrow stromal stem cells versus dental pulp stem cells. Biol. Cell 99, 465–474. doi: 10.1042/BC20070013

PubMed Abstract | Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar