Calvin R. Justus
Lixue Dong
Li V. Yang- 1Department of Oncology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
- 2Department of Internal Medicine, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
- 3Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
The tumor microenvironment is acidic due to glycolytic cancer cell metabolism, hypoxia, and deficient blood perfusion. It is proposed that acidosis in the tumor microenvironment is an important stress factor and selection force for cancer cell somatic evolution. Acidic pH has pleiotropic effects on the proliferation, migration, invasion, metastasis, and therapeutic response of cancer cells and the function of immune cells, vascular cells, and other stromal cells. However, the molecular mechanisms by which cancer cells and stromal cells sense and respond to acidic pH in the tumor microenvironment are poorly understood. In this article the role of a family of pH-sensing G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in tumor biology is reviewed. Recent studies show that the pH-sensing GPCRs, including GPR4, GPR65 (TDAG8), GPR68 (OGR1), and GPR132 (G2A), regulate cancer cell metastasis and proliferation, immune cell function, inflammation, and blood vessel formation. Activation of the proton-sensing GPCRs by acidosis transduces multiple downstream G protein signaling pathways. Since GPCRs are major drug targets, small molecule modulators of the pH-sensing GPCRs are being actively developed and evaluated. Research on the pH-sensing GPCRs will continue to provide important insights into the molecular interaction between tumor and its acidic microenvironment and may identify new targets for cancer therapy and chemoprevention.
Introduction
Solid tumors consist of multiple cell types, such as cancer cells, stromal cells, and immune cells, and a large assortment of extracellular matrix proteins and chemical signals (Hanahan and Weinberg, 2011). The interaction that stromal cells, immune cells, and the extracellular matrix have with cancer cells regulates tumor growth and development. Because of insufficient blood perfusion, hypoxia, inflammation, and glycolytic cell metabolism, the tumor microenvironment has long been known as characteristically acidic (Vaupel et al., 1989; Gatenby and Gillies, 2004; Cairns et al., 2006; Yang et al., 2012). The unique glycolytic metabolism of cancer cells produces an excessive amount of lactic acid (Warburg, 1956). Consequently, the export of protons and lactic acid from tumor cells into the extracellular space by acid-base regulators, such as Na+/H+ exchangers and monocarboxylate transporters, may lead to acidosis in the tumor microenvironment (Izumi et al., 2003; Boedtkjer et al., 2013). Under normal physiological conditions the pH of blood and tissue is tightly controlled around pH 7.4. However, in diseased tissues such as the tumor microenvironment a local pH range from 5.5 to 7.0 is not uncommon (Vaupel et al., 1989; Gatenby and Gillies, 2004). Moreover, intracellular pH of tumor cells is slightly alkaline in comparison to the extracellular space, which has been demonstrated to facilitate cell proliferation and tumor growth (Tannock and Rotin, 1989; Vaupel et al., 1989; Griffiths, 1991; Griffiths et al., 2001; Webb et al., 2011).
Acidosis in the tumor microenvironment may have many effects on the malignancy and development of a tumor (Figure 1). It has been proposed that exposure to chronic acidosis may facilitate cancer cell clonal evolution by inducing chromosomal instability, clastogenicity, and gene mutations (Morita et al., 1992; Xiao et al., 2003). In addition, acidosis may contribute to metastatic progression by degrading the extracellular matrix (Rozhin et al., 1994; Brisson et al., 2012). On the other hand, acidosis can be cytotoxic, inhibit cancer cell proliferation, and induce stress response and apoptosis (Ohtsubo et al., 1997; Williams et al., 1999; Putney and Barber, 2003; Smallbone et al., 2010). Taken together, acidosis has been described as a defining hallmark of the tumor microenvironment. However, the mechanisms by which cancer cells, immune cells, and blood vessels sense acidosis and respond to it are yet to be completely established but may be advantageous for a more comprehensive understanding of tumor biology.
Figure 1. The acidic tumor microenvironment regulates the proliferation, apoptosis, clonal evolution, and metastasis of cancer cells and modulates inflammation, anti-tumor immunity, and angiogenesis.
There are several families of receptors and ion channels that help cells sense extracellular acidosis (Holzer, 2009). In this review we discuss a family of proton-sensing G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) including GPR4, GPR65 (TDAG8), GPR68 (OGR1), and GPR132 (G2A). It has been reported that these GPCRs are involved in cancer cell proliferation, apoptosis, metastasis, angiogenesis, immune cell function, and inflammation (Ludwig et al., 2003; Singh et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2007; Mogi et al., 2009; Castellone et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2011; He et al., 2011; Ren and Zhang, 2011; Wyder et al., 2011; Dong et al., 2013).
Acidosis and Tumor Cell Function
A number of studies have examined the acute and chronic effects of acidosis on tumor cell gene expression, proliferation, apoptosis, and malignancy. In general, cells become stressed in a pH range that deviates moderately from pH 7.4. When the pH range of a tissue significantly falls outside of this category cell function may be affected and apoptosis may be induced. Acute acidosis may inhibit proliferation and increase apoptosis of tumor cells (Ohtsubo et al., 1997; Williams et al., 1999; Putney and Barber, 2003; Smallbone et al., 2010). Chronically, however, acidosis can act as a stressor and select for tumor cells that are resistant to the acidic microenvironment (Moellering et al., 2008; Marino et al., 2012; Wojtkowiak et al., 2012). The mechanism by which tumor cells may overcome acidosis-associated cell death while normal cells perish has been investigated. Autophagy, a catabolic degradation process in which unnecessary organelles and various proteins are recycled, has been described as a mechanism to evade acidosis-related cell death (Marino et al., 2012; Wojtkowiak et al., 2012). Tumor cells may develop chronic autophagy, which allows for acidosis-resistant tumor cells to continue to survive and proliferate (Marino et al., 2012; Wojtkowiak et al., 2012). In addition, several reports connect p53 activity to acidosis-mediated cell death (Williams et al., 1999; Reichert et al., 2002). In tumor cells with p53 mutations acidosis-mediated cell death may be bypassed and cell division may continue to take place, which confers a survival advantage to some tumor cells (Williams et al., 1999; Reichert et al., 2002).
The effects of acidosis on cancer development and progression are complex. They may be separated into acute and chronic exposure related effects as the responses of tumor cells to these conditions are diverse. It has been reported that chronically high lactate in cervical cancers are correlated with a reduction in patient survival (Walenta et al., 2000). In addition, several reports have indicated that chronic systemic buffer therapy may reduce tumor growth and metastasis in SCID or TRAMP mice indicating that chronic acidosis may facilitate tumor growth and metastasis (Ibrahim Hashim et al., 2011; Ibrahim-Hashim et al., 2012). Acidosis has also been demonstrated to increase the secretion of proteases such as cathepsin B in melanoma cells and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in human osteosarcoma cells (Rozhin et al., 1994; Matsubara et al., 2013), which may facilitate the degradation of extracellular matrix proteins and subsequently accelerate tumor cell invasion. Acidosis has been reported to increase aggressiveness in human melanoma cells. By treating A-07, D-12, and T-22 human melanoma cells with media buffered to pH 6.8, several proteins such as MMP-2, MMP-9, cathepsin B, cathepsin L, VEGF-A, and IL-8 are upregulated and contribute to increased experimental lung metastasis post tail vein injections in athymic nude mice (Rofstad et al., 2006).
On the other hand, acidosis has been reported to induce tumor cell apoptosis, and inhibit cell proliferation and carcinogenesis (Ohtsubo et al., 1997; Zanke et al., 1998; Williams et al., 1999; Putney and Barber, 2003; Smallbone et al., 2010; Matsubara et al., 2013). Episodic and transient acidosis is proposed to be a possible mechanism by which increased physical activity reduces the risk of cancer incidence (Smallbone et al., 2010). It has been reported there is decreased expression of glycolytic genes and increased expression of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and electron transport genes in response to acute acidosis in breast epithelial cells (Chen et al., 2008). The gene signature in response to acute acidosis is correlated with a higher survival in breast cancer patients. Furthermore, the response to acute acidosis in prostate cancer cells has been reported to reduce the activation of the oncogene Akt (protein kinase B) (Chen et al., 2008), which is upregulated in a variety of cancers and is important for several processes such as glucose uptake, cell survival, and cell proliferation.
In addition, acidosis in the tumor microenvironment may affect the response of cancer cells to therapy. It has been demonstrated that the efficacy of some chemotherapeutics is affected under acidic pH in comparison to the physiological pH. Acidic extracellular pH may also modulate the charge status of weak acid and weak base chemotherapy drugs and therefore, influence the uptake of these drugs across the cell membrane, in particular, reducing the uptake of weak base drugs and increasing the uptake of weak acid drugs (Reichert et al., 2002; Cairns et al., 2006; Gerweck et al., 2006).
Acidosis and the Inflammatory Response
The inflammatory response in the tumor microenvironment has long been known to show both tumor promoting activity as well as anti-tumor activity (Kim et al., 2007; Grivennikov et al., 2010; Hanahan and Weinberg, 2011). How acidosis may affect the activity of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment may be highly valuable in the field of cancer biology and tumor immunology. Inflammatory cells and mediators themselves may further reduce the pH of the tumor microenvironment by increasing glucose uptake and glycolysis as well as stimulating ATP-dependent proton extrusion mechanisms (Grinstein et al., 1991; Imtiyaz and Simon, 2010). Numerous studies indicate that acidosis has multiple effects on the function and response of inflammatory mediators such as neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages, and the complement pathways (Lardner, 2001; Martinez et al., 2006; Jancic et al., 2012).
Acidosis induces the activation of neutrophils through the PI3-kinase/Akt and ERK signaling pathways (Martinez et al., 2006), and it also prompts the release of platelet-activating factor, a potent inflammatory activator, from human neutrophils through the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway (Owen et al., 2005). Neutrophils themselves may enhance acidosis and hypoxia in the tumor microenvironment by increasing oxygen consumption and subsequently emitting protons following respiratory burst (Van Zwieten et al., 1981; Borregaard et al., 1984). Acidosis may also stimulate the release of IL-1β from monocytes and TNF-α from resident alveolar macrophages both of which are strong inflammatory mediators (Heming et al., 2001; Jancic et al., 2012). Paradoxically, acidosis can also reduce the inflammatory/immune response. In other reports the activity of natural killer (NK) as well as lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells is reduced and the release of TNF-α, interferon-γ, IL-10, IL-12 and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) is also diminished by acidosis (Fischer et al., 2000; Muller et al., 2000). Studies also showed that acidosis impairs cytolytic activity and causes anergy of CD8+ T lymphocytes (Calcinotto et al., 2012). The mechanisms by which inflammatory/immune cells sense acidosis and respond to it may be of importance in the tumor immunology and inflammation field as this is the environment the immune cells function in.
Acidosis and Blood Vessels
Blood vessels formed in the tumor microenvironment are characterized by structural abnormalities, functional defects, and hyperpermeability (Fukumura and Jain, 2007; Nagy et al., 2010). Due to rapid tumor growth and an increased distance between vasculature and cancer cells beyond the oxygen diffusion limit, the tumor microenvironment is hypoxic and acidic (Gatenby and Gillies, 2004). Consequently, hypoxia and acidosis also regulate the generation of new blood vessels from pre-existing blood vessels, a process known as angiogenesis.
Acidosis has been reported to inhibit angiogenesis in the aortic ring vessel outgrowth model (Burbridge et al., 1999). In the presence of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), however, this inhibitory effect may be attenuated and angiogenesis may resume (Burbridge et al., 1999). It has been shown that acidosis increases the expression of VEGF and bFGF in endothelial cells (D'arcangelo et al., 2000). In addition, a separate study found that pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells produce VEGF in response to acidic pH (Shi et al., 2001). The release of VEGF and bFGF in the tumor microenvironment by tumor cells and endothelial cells may compensate for reduced angiogenesis, and increase the rate of blood vessel growth in acidic conditions.
In addition to angiogenesis acidosis also regulates vascular tone. Acidosis-induced coronary arteriolar dilation is mediated by ATP-sensitive potassium channels (Ishizaka et al., 1999). Furthermore, acidosis can stimulate the inflammatory response of vascular endothelial cells in which the pH-sensing GPR4 receptor is involved (Chen et al., 2011; Dong et al., 2013).
pH-Sensing G Protein-Coupled Receptors and Tumor Cells
As previously mentioned, the effects of acidosis on tumor cells have been investigated; however, the molecular mechanisms that facilitate these effects are largely unknown due to the complexity of acidosis response. Proton-sensing GPCRs including GPR4, TDAG8 (GPR65), OGR1 (GPR68), and G2A (GPR132) have recently been identified as novel pH sensors that are proposed to be activated by acidic extracellular pH through the protonation of several histidine residues of these receptors (Ludwig et al., 2003; Murakami et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2004; Ishii et al., 2005; Radu et al., 2005; Seuwen et al., 2006; Yang et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2010b; Sun et al., 2010; Saxena et al., 2012). Proton-sensing GPCRs may play a role in tumor development, metastasis, inflammation, and angiogenesis (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Major effects of the pH-sensing G protein-coupled receptors on tumor cells and associated stromal cells and immune cells.
GPR4, stimulated by acidosis, has been reported to activate the Gs, G12/13, and Gq G-protein pathways (Ludwig et al., 2003; Tobo et al., 2007; Castellone et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2011). When ectopically overexpressed in murine B16F10 melanoma cells, activation of GPR4 by acidosis has several effects on tumor cell function such as decreasing cell membrane protrusions, inhibiting cancer cell migration, and reducing melanoma cell lung metastasis through the G12/13/Rho pathway; whereas GPR4 does not significantly inhibit primary B16F10 melanoma growth (Castellone et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2012). The GPR4 deficiency in mice, however, has been reported to reduce the growth of tumor allografts by impairing angiogenesis from the host mice (Wyder et al., 2011). It has also been shown that ectopic overexpression of GPR4 can transform NIH3T3 fibroblast cells (Sin et al., 2004). Collectively, both tumor-promoting and tumor-suppressing effects of GPR4 have been reported, which may depend on cell type and biological context.
OGR1, another family member, has been reported to suppress metastasis when overexpressed in prostate cancer cells. Following injection into the mouse prostate, PC3 prostate cancer cells that overexpress OGR1 have markedly reduced metastasis to the lung, spleen, and diaphragm (Singh et al., 2007). A separate study found OGR1 expression is lower in distant metastatic lesions in comparison to the primary tumor (Latulippe et al., 2002). Furthermore, overexpression of OGR1 in HEY ovarian cancer cells reduced cell migration and increased cell adhesion to several extracellular matrix proteins (Ren and Zhang, 2011). Similar effects of cancer metastasis suppression by GPR4 and OGR1 may be due to the fact that they share the highest homology between the members of the proton sensing GPCRs.
TDAG8 may also affect tumor development and growth. It has been reported that the overexpression of TDAG8 in Lewis lung carcinoma cells increases tumor growth in mice and may facilitate resistance to acidosis-mediated cell death in vitro through protein kinase A (PKA) and ERK related pathways (Ihara et al., 2010). In addition, knockdown of TDAG8 in NCI-H460 human non-small cell lung cancer cells by shRNA decreases cell survival in acidic conditions (Ihara et al., 2010). TDAG8 activation by acidosis also promotes evasion of cell apoptosis under glutamine starvation (Ryder et al., 2012) and its overexpression has been reported to transform immortalized mammary epithelial cells (Sin et al., 2004). Alternatively, TDAG8 expression and activation stimulates glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis (Malone et al., 2004) and inhibits c-Myc oncogene expression (Li et al., 2013) in lymphoma cells and lymphocytes that have high level of endogenous TDAG8 expression. Interestingly, the expression of TDAG8 mRNA is decreased by more than 50% in human lymphoma samples in comparison to non-tumorous lymphoid tissues (Li et al., 2013).
Compared to GPR4, OGR1, and TDAG8, the pH-sensing function of G2A is less defined. Whereas the proton-sensing activity can be detected in G2A-overexpressing cells, the receptor is dispensable for acid sensing in native lymphocytes (Radu et al., 2005). G2A was originally found to affect tumor development and inhibit cell cycle progression at the G2/M stage, leading to G2 accumulation (G2A) and mitosis inhibition (Weng et al., 1998). It is primarily expressed in immune cells and has been known to mitigate BCR/ABL transformation in the mouse leukemia model (Le et al., 2002). Alternatively, some studies indicate that G2A has a transforming ability in NIH3T3 fibroblasts by leading to loss of contact inhibition, anchorage independent growth, survival, and proliferation as well as increased tumorigenicity in mice (Zohn et al., 2000). G2A may also affect the actin cytoskeleton through Gα13 and stimulate RhoA dependent actin stress fiber development in swiss 3T3 fibroblasts (Kabarowski et al., 2000). In addition, G2A is mainly studied as an immune regulatory GPCR due to the high expression in lymphoid tissues, which may affect tumor immunology and therefore, possibly affect tumor development and growth.
pH-Sensing G Protein-Coupled Receptors and Inflammation
GPR4, OGR1, TDAG8, and G2A have all been reported to regulate inflammatory responses (Mogi et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2011; Onozawa et al., 2011, 2012; Yan et al., 2012; Dong et al., 2013). Recent studies demonstrated that activation of GPR4 by acidosis induced a broad inflammatory response in human vascular endothelial cells as revealed by microarray analysis (Dong et al., 2013). Specifically, GPR4 activation by acidosis upregulates the expression of adhesion molecules, pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, NF-κ B pathway genes, and prostaglandin-endoperoxidase synthase 2 (PTGS2 or COX2) (Chen et al., 2011; Dong et al., 2013). Furthermore, both static cell adhesion assay and flow chamber assay showed that acidosis-induced GPR4 activation leads to the increased endothelial cell adhesion with leukocytes mainly through the Gs/cAMP/Epac pathway (Chen et al., 2011; Dong et al., 2013).
OGR1 may be involved in tumor immune response. Yan et al. recently demonstrated that OGR1 deficiency in host cells may significantly reduce tumor allograft development of prostate cancer cells in the OGR1 knockout mice (Yan et al., 2012). It was shown in the same study that T cells are required for the rejection of inoculated tumor cells. The authors concluded that OGR1expression in myeloid-derived cells is needed for the immunosuppression induced by prostate cancer cells (Yan et al., 2012).
TDAG8 is highly expressed in immune cells. TDAG8 in mouse peritoneal macrophages has been demonstrated to aid in the process of inhibiting cytokine production from extracellular acidification (Mogi et al., 2009). In addition, TDAG8 deficiency in mice intensifies the type II collagen-induced arthritis and delayed-type hypersensitivity, which demonstrated that TDAG8 may be a negative regulator of the immune response (Onozawa et al., 2011). A putative TDAG8 agonist has recently been identified (Onozawa et al., 2012). Studies showed that the TDAG8 agonist reduces the expression of IL-2 in mouse splenocytes stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies and reduces TNF-α and IL-6 in mouse peritoneal macrophages stimulated with lipopolysaccharide in vitro (Onozawa et al., 2012). In a previous study, TDAG8 was reported to play a role in glucocorticoid-induced thymocyte apoptosis in the TDAG8 transgenic mouse model (Tosa et al., 2003). More recently, however, a study demonstrated TDAG8 deficiency does not affect immune system development or glucocorticoid-induced thymocyte apoptosis in the TDAG8 knockout mice (Radu et al., 2006). In eosinophils TDAG8 is the principal proton sensor (Kottyan et al., 2009). Its activity has been demonstrated to increase eosinophil viability and reduce apoptosis which may affect allergic airway disease (Kottyan et al., 2009).
Whereas G2A is also highly expressed in leukocytes, its function in immune cell response to acidosis is unclear. A previous study showed that the pH-sensing capability of G2A is much weaker than other family members (Radu et al., 2006). Instead, a number of reports demonstrated that G2A may mediate the effects of bioactive lipids on immune cells. G2A is required for the chemotaxis of T cells and macrophages toward lysophosphatidylcholine (Radu et al., 2004; Yang et al., 2005; Peter et al., 2008), a pro-inflammatory molecule produced in apoptosis, atherosclerosis and other processes. By increasing macrophage chemotaxis to apoptotic cells G2A may suppress the induction of autoimmunity and inflammation (Peter et al., 2008). G2A was also found to be critical for the lysophosphatidylserine-stimulated clearance of dying neutrophils by macrophages (Frasch et al., 2008). G2A may also function as an anti-autoimmune receptor in mice as G2A-null mice develop a late-onset autoimmune disorder in that G2A may control peripheral lymphocyte homeostasis (Le et al., 2001).
Furthermore, acidosis in inflamed regions may lead to elevated level of pain and increased sensitivity of nociceptors to thermal and mechanical stimuli (Steen et al., 1992; Issberner et al., 1996; Huang et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2009; Hang et al., 2012). The amount of pain may be directly attributed to the amount of acidification. All of the pH sensing GPCRs are expressed in pain relevant loci such as the dorsal root ganglia neurons and particularly small diameter neurons responsible for nociception (Huang et al., 2007). These pH receptors such as TDAG8 and G2A may function to sense high levels of protons for pain sensory and to regulate the development of hyperalgesia (Chen et al., 2009). It was also shown that TDAG8 and its downstream PKA pathway are involved in sensing cancer pain in rats (Hang et al., 2012).
pH-Sensing G Protein-Coupled Receptors and Blood Vessels
As previously described, angiogenesis in tumors may result in the abnormal development of blood vessels characterized by structural and functional defects (Fukumura and Jain, 2007; Nagy et al., 2010). Furthermore, acidosis may inhibit the growth of blood vessels but the addition of sufficient VEGF and bFGF can rescue the vessel growth (Burbridge et al., 1999). GPR4 has been investigated as one of the contributors to blood vessel growth by regulating the expression of VEGF receptors (Wyder et al., 2011). GPR4 also regulates the integrity and stability of blood vessels. A fraction of GPR4 knockout mouse neonates have increasing rates of spontaneous hemorrhage likely due to the abnormalities of small blood vessels (Yang et al., 2007). Consistently, more fragile and patchy blood vessels were observed in the tumors grown in the GPR4 knockout mice in comparison to that in the wild type mice (Wyder et al., 2011).
Another receptor, OGR1, has been implicated in vascular smooth muscle function. OGR1 has been recently attributed as a major receptor responsible for acidosis stimulation of PGI(2) production and cAMP accumulation in human aortic smooth muscle cells (Tomura et al., 2005). Moreover, OGR1 knockdown with small interfering RNA inhibited acidosis-induced COX-2, PGI(2), and MKP-1 expression in human aortic smooth muscle cells (Liu et al., 2010a). These effects were further found to be regulated by the G(q/11) G-protein signaling pathway (Liu et al., 2010a).
Therapeutic Implications: Targeting the Acidic Tumor Microenvironment
As the tumor microenvironment is characteristically acidic, molecular pathways involved in acid-base regulation and pH homeostasis have been explored to devise new approaches for cancer treatment (Izumi et al., 2003; Swietach et al., 2010; Webb et al., 2011). For instance, several groups have recently found that proton pump inhibitors may reduce neoplastic development of esophageal adenocarcinoma and hepatoblastoma (Morimura et al., 2008; Kastelein et al., 2013). In a five-year study a group recognized that proton pump inhibitors such as omeprazole, esomeprazole, rabeprazole, pantoprazole, or lansoprazole lead to a significant reduction in the progression of neoplastic growth and development in patients with Barrett's esophagus (Kastelein et al., 2013). In addition, another group showed that Bafilomycin A1, a vacuolar-type proton pump inhibitor, increases apoptosis in hepatoblastoma cells but not in normal cells, suggesting that it may be a potential treatment to kill cancer cells (Morimura et al., 2008).
Another method that has been tested is basic buffer therapy. In the athymic nude mouse tumor model or TRAMP prostate cancer mouse model, systemic basic buffer therapy was used to increase the pH of the body and tumor microenvironment with the overall goal of reducing tumor development and metastasis (Ibrahim Hashim et al., 2011; Ibrahim-Hashim et al., 2012). Sodium bicarbonate was fed orally over a prolonged period of time, which reduced acidosis in the tumor microenvironment as well as tumor growth, development, and metastasis in the TRAMP mouse model (Ibrahim-Hashim et al., 2012).
Acidosis in the tumor microenvironment has also been exploited to specifically deliver cancer therapeutics and imaging agents to the tumor sites (Vavere et al., 2009; Han et al., 2013; Lin et al., 2013). For example, the use of acid-released nanoparticles, such as polyethylene glycol based hydrogels integrated with imidazole and antagomir, or acid-released nanoparticles carrying gene expression constructs, may increase cancer therapy effectiveness by reducing the systemic effects normally found in chemotherapy (Han et al., 2013; Lin et al., 2013). Recent studies also demonstrate that a type of small peptide, the pH low insertion peptide (pHLIP), can form an α-helix and insert itself into cell membranes specifically at acidic pH. The pHLIP has been used to exclusively deliver imaging agents to the acidic tumor microenvironment for cancer detection in animal models (Vavere et al., 2009).
Since GPCRs are important pharmaceutical targets (Jacoby et al., 2006), modulation of the pH-sensing GPCRs may be highly valuable in the field of cancer therapy and chemoprevention. As discussed in this review, proton-sensing GPCRs play numerous roles in tumor cell behavior, inflammation, and blood vessel growth. Manipulating the proton-sensing GPCRs or their downstream signaling pathways may have anti-cancer therapeutic applicability. Small molecule modulators of the pH-sensing GPCRs are being actively developed and evaluated. Antagonists of GPR4 and agonists of OGR1 and TDAG8 have recently been identified, and these compounds show biological activities that inhibit inflammation and block malignant astrocyte proliferation, among other activities (Taracido et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2011; Onozawa et al., 2012; Russell et al., 2012; Dong et al., 2013). Moreover, recent progress in nanoparticle delivery of gene expression constructs and oligonucleotides may provide new avenues to target the pH-sensing GPCRs by exploiting the unique acidic tumor microenvironment (Han et al., 2013; Lin et al., 2013). Several reports have found that GPR4 and OGR1 may function as metastasis suppressors (Latulippe et al., 2002; Singh et al., 2007; Castellone et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2012). Conceivably, acidic pH-released nanoparticles infused with gene constructs to express the pH-sensing GPCRs, such as GPR4 and OGR1, may be specifically delivered into the tumor microenvironment to further minimize systemic toxicity due to the fact that these receptors are only active in acidic environments. Whereas modulators of the proton sensing GPCRs may be of some therapeutic benefit, limitations do exist. For instance, the application of proton sensing G protein-coupled receptor modulators will not address all of the pathogenic issues that may arise from acidosis or altered pH. Acidosis in general is a very complex pathophysiological factor that has a broad effect on various cell processes and functions. Moreover, there are multiple acid-base sensing and transport systems that tightly regulate pH homeostasis at the molecular and cellular level. This makes uncovering specific mechanisms from altered pH and targeting acidosis-related signaling pathways a potentially difficult task. Nonetheless, the implications for this family of proton sensing GPCRs are ever expanding in tumor biology and may prove crucial to understanding how tumor cells, immune cells, and blood vessels sense and respond to acidosis in the tumor microenvironment.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed to data collection and manuscript writing.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We apologize to the colleagues whose work could not be cited due to the space limitation of this manuscript. The work in the authors' laboratory has been supported in part by research grants from the American Heart Association, Brody Brothers Endowment Fund, East Carolina University Startup Funds, Golfers against Cancer Foundation, North Carolina Biotechnology Center, and Vidant Medical Center Cancer Research and Education Fund (to Li V. Yang).
References
Boedtkjer, E., Moreira, J. M., Mele, M., Vahl, P., Wielenga, V. T., Christiansen, P. M., et al. (2013). Contribution of Na+,HCO3(-)-cotransport to cellular pH control in human breast cancer: a role for the breast cancer susceptibility locus NBCn1 (SLC4A7). Int. J. Cancer 132, 1288–1299. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27782
Borregaard, N., Schwartz, J. H., and Tauber, A. I. (1984). Proton secretion by stimulated neutrophils. Significance of hexose monophosphate shunt activity as source of electrons and protons for the respiratory burst. J. Clin. Invest. 74, 455–459. doi: 10.1172/JCI111442
Brisson, L., Reshkin, S. J., Gore, J., and Roger, S. (2012). pH regulators in invadosomal functioning: proton delivery for matrix tasting. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 91, 847–860. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2012.04.004
Burbridge, M. F., West, D. C., Atassi, G., and Tucker, G. C. (1999). The effect of extracellular pH on angiogenesis in vitro. Angiogenesis 3, 281–288. doi: 10.1023/A:1009092511894
Cairns, R., Papandreou, I., and Denko, N. (2006). Overcoming physiologic barriers to cancer treatment by molecularly targeting the tumor microenvironment. Mol. Cancer Res. 4, 61–70. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-06-0002
Calcinotto, A., Filipazzi, P., Grioni, M., Iero, M., De Milito, A., Ricupito, A., et al. (2012). Modulation of microenvironment acidity reverses anergy in human and murine tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes. Cancer Res. 72, 2746–2756. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1272
Castellone, R. D., Leffler, N. R., Dong, L., and Yang, L. V. (2011). Inhibition of tumor cell migration and metastasis by the proton-sensing GPR4 receptor. Cancer Lett. 312, 197–208. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.08.013
Chen, A., Dong, L., Leffler, N. R., Asch, A. S., Witte, O. N., and Yang, L. V. (2011). Activation of GPR4 by acidosis increases endothelial cell adhesion through the cAMP/Epac pathway. PLoS ONE 6:e27586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027586
Chen, J. L., Lucas, J. E., Schroeder, T., Mori, S., Wu, J., Nevins, J., et al. (2008). The genomic analysis of lactic acidosis and acidosis response in human cancers. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000293
Chen, Y. J., Huang, C. W., Lin, C. S., Chang, W. H., and Sun, W. H. (2009). Expression and function of proton-sensing G-protein-coupled receptors in inflammatory pain. Mol. Pain 5, 39. doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-5-39
D'arcangelo, D., Facchiano, F., Barlucchi, L. M., Melillo, G., Illi, B., Testolin, L., et al. (2000). Acidosis inhibits endothelial cell apoptosis and function and induces basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor expression. Circ. Res. 86, 312–318. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.86.3.312
Dong, L., Li, Z., Leffler, N. R., Asch, A. S., Chi, J. T., and Yang, L. V. (2013). Acidosis activation of the proton-sensing GPR4 receptor stimulates vascular endothelial cell inflammatory responses revealed by transcriptome analysis. PLoS ONE 8:e61991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061991
Fischer, B., Muller, B., Fischer, K. G., Baur, N., and Kreutz, W. (2000). Acidic pH inhibits non-MHC-restricted killer cell functions. Clin. Immunol. 96, 252–263. doi: 10.1006/clim.2000.4904
Frasch, S. C., Berry, K. Z., Fernandez-Boyanapalli, R., Jin, H. S., Leslie, C., Henson, P. M., et al. (2008). NADPH oxidase-dependent generation of lysophosphatidylserine enhances clearance of activated and dying neutrophils via G2A. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 33736–33749. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M807047200
Fukumura, D., and Jain, R. K. (2007). Tumor microenvironment abnormalities: causes, consequences, and strategies to normalize. J. Cell. Biochem. 101, 937–949. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21187
Gatenby, R. A., and Gillies, R. J. (2004). Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis? Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 891–899. doi: 10.1038/nrc1478
Gerweck, L. E., Vijayappa, S., and Kozin, S. (2006). Tumor pH controls the in vivo efficacy of weak acid and base chemotherapeutics. Mol. Cancer Ther. 5, 1275–1279. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0024
Griffiths, J. R. (1991). Are cancer cells acidic? Br. J. Cancer 64, 425–427. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1991.326
Griffiths, J. R., Mcintyre, D. J., Howe, F. A., and Stubbs, M. (2001). Why are cancers acidic? A carrier-mediated diffusion model for H+ transport in the interstitial fluid. Novartis Found. Symp. 240, 46–62<>. discussion: 62–67, <>152–153. doi: 10.1002/0470868716.ch4
Grinstein, S., Swallow, C. J., and Rotstein, O. D. (1991). Regulation of cytoplasmic pH in phagocytic cell function and dysfunction. Clin. Biochem. 24, 241–247. doi: 10.1016/0009-9120(91)80014-T
Grivennikov, S. I., Greten, F. R., and Karin, M. (2010). Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell 140, 883–899. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.025
Han, L., Guo, Y., Ma, H., He, X., Kuang, Y., Zhang, N., et al. (2013). Acid active receptor-specific peptide ligand for in vivo tumor-targeted delivery. Small 9, 3647–3658. doi: 10.1002/smll.201300279
Hanahan, D., and Weinberg, R. A. (2011). Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
Hang, L. H., Yang, J. P., Yin, W., Wang, L. N., Guo, F., Ji, F. H., et al. (2012). Activation of spinal TDAG8 and its downstream PKA signaling pathway contribute to bone cancer pain in rats. Eur. J. Neurosci. 36, 2107–2117. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08087.x
He, X. D., Tobo, M., Mogi, C., Nakakura, T., Komachi, M., Murata, N., et al. (2011). Involvement of proton-sensing receptor TDAG8 in the anti-inflammatory actions of dexamethasone in peritoneal macrophages. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 415, 627–631. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.10.122
Heming, T. A., Dave, S. K., Tuazon, D. M., Chopra, A. K., Peterson, J. W., and Bidani, A. (2001). Effects of extracellular pH on tumour necrosis factor-alpha production by resident alveolar macrophages. Clin. Sci. 101, 267–274. doi: 10.1042/CS20010139
Holzer, P. (2009). Acid-sensitive ion channels and receptors. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 194, 283–332. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-79090-7_9
Huang, C. W., Tzeng, J. N., Chen, Y. J., Tsai, W. F., Chen, C. C., and Sun, W. H. (2007). Nociceptors of dorsal root ganglion express proton-sensing G-protein-coupled receptors. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 36, 195–210. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2007.06.010
Ibrahim-Hashim, A., Cornnell, H. H., Abrahams, D., Lloyd, M., Bui, M., Gillies, R. J., et al. (2012). Systemic buffers inhibit carcinogenesis in TRAMP mice. J. Urol. 188, 624–631. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.03.113
Ibrahim Hashim, A., Cornnell, H. H., Coelho Ribeiro Mde, L., Abrahams, D., Cunningham, J., Lloyd, M., et al. (2011). Reduction of metastasis using a non-volatile buffer. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 28, 841–849. doi: 10.1007/s10585-011-9415-7
Ihara, Y., Kihara, Y., Hamano, F., Yanagida, K., Morishita, Y., Kunita, A., et al. (2010). The G protein-coupled receptor T-cell death-associated gene 8 (TDAG8) facilitates tumor development by serving as an extracellular pH sensor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 17309–17314. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001165107
Imtiyaz, H. Z., and Simon, M. C. (2010). Hypoxia-inducible factors as essential regulators of inflammation. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 345, 105–120. doi: 10.1007/82_2010_74
Ishii, S., Kihara, Y., and Shimizu, T. (2005). Identification of T cell death-associated gene 8 (TDAG8) as a novel acid sensing G-protein-coupled receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 9083–9087. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M407832200
Ishizaka, H., Gudi, S. R., Frangos, J. A., and Kuo, L. (1999). Coronary arteriolar dilation to acidosis: role of ATP-sensitive potassium channels and pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins. Circulation 99, 558–563. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.99.4.558
Issberner, U., Reeh, P. W., and Steen, K. H. (1996). Pain due to tissue acidosis: a mechanism for inflammatory and ischemic myalgia? Neurosci. Lett. 208, 191–194. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(96)12576-3
Izumi, H., Torigoe, T., Ishiguchi, H., Uramoto, H., Yoshida, Y., Tanabe, M., et al. (2003). Cellular pH regulators: potentially promising molecular targets for cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Treat. Rev. 29, 541–549. doi: 10.1016/S0305-7372(03)00106-3
Jacoby, E., Bouhelal, R., Gerspacher, M., and Seuwen, K. (2006). The 7 TM G-protein-coupled receptor target family. ChemMedChem 1, 761–782. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.200600134
Jancic, C. C., Cabrini, M., Gabelloni, M. L., Rodriguez Rodrigues, C., Salamone, G., Trevani, A. S., et al. (2012). Low extracellular pH stimulates the production of IL-1beta by human monocytes. Cytokine 57, 258–268. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2011.11.013
Kabarowski, J. H., Feramisco, J. D., Le, L. Q., Gu, J. L., Luoh, S. W., Simon, M. I., et al. (2000). Direct genetic demonstration of G alpha 13 coupling to the orphan G protein-coupled receptor G2A leading to RhoA-dependent actin rearrangement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 12109–12114. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.22.12109
Kastelein, F., Spaander, M. C., Steyerberg, E. W., Biermann, K., Valkhoff, V. E., Kuipers, E. J., et al. (2013). Proton pump inhibitors reduce the risk of neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett's esophagus. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 11, 382–388. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.11.014
Kim, R., Emi, M., and Tanabe, K. (2007). Cancer immunoediting from immune surveillance to immune escape. Immunology 121, 1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02587.x
Kottyan, L. C., Collier, A. R., Cao, K. H., Niese, K. A., Hedgebeth, M., Radu, C. G., et al. (2009). Eosinophil viability is increased by acidic pH in a cAMP- and GPR65-dependent manner. Blood 114, 2774–2782. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-05-220681
Lardner, A. (2001). The effects of extracellular pH on immune function. J. Leukoc. Biol. 69, 522–530.
Latulippe, E., Satagopan, J., Smith, A., Scher, H., Scardino, P., Reuter, V., et al. (2002). Comprehensive gene expression analysis of prostate cancer reveals distinct transcriptional programs associated with metastatic disease. Cancer Res. 62, 4499–4506.
Le, L. Q., Kabarowski, J. H., Weng, Z., Satterthwaite, A. B., Harvill, E. T., Jensen, E. R., et al. (2001). Mice lacking the orphan G protein-coupled receptor G2A develop a late-onset autoimmune syndrome. Immunity 14, 561–571. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(01)00145-5
Le, L. Q., Kabarowski, J. H., Wong, S., Nguyen, K., Gambhir, S. S., and Witte, O. N. (2002). Positron emission tomography imaging analysis of G2A as a negative modifier of lymphoid leukemogenesis initiated by the BCR-ABL oncogene. Cancer Cell 1, 381–391. doi: 10.1016/S1535-6108(02)00058-2
Li, Z., Dong, L., Dean, E., and Yang, L. V. (2013). Acidosis decreases c-Myc oncogene expression in human lymphoma cells: a role for the proton-sensing G protein-coupled receptor TDAG8. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 20236–20255. doi: 10.3390/ijms141020236
Lin, C. W., Tseng, S. J., Kempson, I. M., Yang, S. C., Hong, T. M., and Yang, P. C. (2013). Extracellular delivery of modified oligonucleotide and superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles from a degradable hydrogel triggered by tumor acidosis. Biomaterials 34, 4387–4393. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.02.058
Liu, J. P., Komachi, M., Tomura, H., Mogi, C., Damirin, A., Tobo, M., et al. (2010a). Ovarian cancer G protein-coupled receptor 1-dependent and -independent vascular actions to acidic pH in human aortic smooth muscle cells. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 299, H731–H742. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00977.2009
Liu, J. P., Nakakura, T., Tomura, H., Tobo, M., Mogi, C., Wang, J. Q., et al. (2010b). Each one of certain histidine residues in G-protein-coupled receptor GPR4 is critical for extracellular proton-induced stimulation of multiple G-protein-signaling pathways. Pharmacol. Res. 61, 499–505. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2010.02.013
Ludwig, M. G., Vanek, M., Guerini, D., Gasser, J. A., Jones, C. E., Junker, U., et al. (2003). Proton-sensing G-protein-coupled receptors. Nature 425, 93–98. doi: 10.1038/nature01905
Malone, M. H., Wang, Z., and Distelhorst, C. W. (2004). The glucocorticoid-induced gene tdag8 encodes a pro-apoptotic G protein-coupled receptor whose activation promotes glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 52850–52859. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M408040200
Marino, M. L., Pellegrini, P., Di Lernia, G., Djavaheri-Mergny, M., Brnjic, S., Zhang, X., et al. (2012). Autophagy is a protective mechanism for human melanoma cells under acidic stress. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 30664–30676. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.339127
Martinez, D., Vermeulen, M., Trevani, A., Ceballos, A., Sabatte, J., Gamberale, R., et al. (2006). Extracellular acidosis induces neutrophil activation by a mechanism dependent on activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt and ERK pathways. J. Immunol. 176, 1163–1171.
Matsubara, T., Diresta, G. R., Kakunaga, S., Li, D., and Healey, J. H. (2013). Additive influence of extracellular pH, oxygen tension, and pressure on invasiveness and survival of human osteosarcoma cells. Front. Oncol. 3:199. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00199
Moellering, R. E., Black, K. C., Krishnamurty, C., Baggett, B. K., Stafford, P., Rain, M., et al. (2008). Acid treatment of melanoma cells selects for invasive phenotypes. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 25, 411–425. doi: 10.1007/s10585-008-9145-7
Mogi, C., Tobo, M., Tomura, H., Murata, N., He, X. D., Sato, K., et al. (2009). Involvement of proton-sensing TDAG8 in extracellular acidification-induced inhibition of proinflammatory cytokine production in peritoneal macrophages. J. Immunol. 182, 3243–3251. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803466
Morimura, T., Fujita, K., Akita, M., Nagashima, M., and Satomi, A. (2008). The proton pump inhibitor inhibits cell growth and induces apoptosis in human hepatoblastoma. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 24, 1087–1094. doi: 10.1007/s00383-008-2229-2
Morita, T., Nagaki, T., Fukuda, I., and Okumura, K. (1992). Clastogenicity of low pH to various cultured mammalian cells. Mutat. Res. 268, 297–305. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(92)90235-T
Muller, B., Fischer, B., and Kreutz, W. (2000). An acidic microenvironment impairs the generation of non-major histocompatibility complex-restricted killer cells. Immunology 99, 375–384. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2000.00975.x
Murakami, N., Yokomizo, T., Okuno, T., and Shimizu, T. (2004). G2A is a proton-sensing G-protein-coupled receptor antagonized by lysophosphatidylcholine. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 42484–42491. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M406561200
Nagy, J. A., Chang, S. H., Shih, S. C., Dvorak, A. M., and Dvorak, H. F. (2010). Heterogeneity of the tumor vasculature. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 36, 321–331. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1253454
Ohtsubo, T., Wang, X., Takahashi, A., Ohnishi, K., Saito, H., Song, C. W., et al. (1997). p53-dependent induction of WAF1 by a low-pH culture condition in human glioblastoma cells. Cancer Res. 57, 3910–3913.
Onozawa, Y., Fujita, Y., Kuwabara, H., Nagasaki, M., Komai, T., and Oda, T. (2012). Activation of T cell death-associated gene 8 regulates the cytokine production of T cells and macrophages in vitro. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 683, 325–331. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2012.03.007
Onozawa, Y., Komai, T., and Oda, T. (2011). Activation of T cell death-associated gene 8 attenuates inflammation by negatively regulating the function of inflammatory cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 654, 315–319. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.01.005
Owen, J. S., Baker, P. R., O'flaherty, J. T., Thomas, M. J., Samuel, M. P., Wooten, R. E., et al. (2005). Stress-induced platelet-activating factor synthesis in human neutrophils. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1733, 120–129. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2004.12.016
Peter, C., Waibel, M., Radu, C. G., Yang, L. V., Witte, O. N., Schulze-Osthoff, K., et al. (2008). Migration to apoptotic “find-me” signals is mediated via the phagocyte receptor G2A. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 5296–5305. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M706586200
Putney, L. K., and Barber, D. L. (2003). Na-H exchange-dependent increase in intracellular pH times G2/M entry and transition. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 44645–44649. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M308099200
Radu, C. G., Cheng, D., Nijagal, A., Riedinger, M., Mclaughlin, J., Yang, L. V., et al. (2006). Normal immune development and glucocorticoid-induced thymocyte apoptosis in mice deficient for the T-cell death-associated gene 8 receptor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 668–677. doi: 10.1128/MCB.26.2.668-677.2006
Radu, C. G., Nijagal, A., Mclaughlin, J., Wang, L., and Witte, O. N. (2005). Differential proton sensitivity of related G protein-coupled receptors T cell death-associated gene 8 and G2A expressed in immune cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 1632–1637. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409415102
Radu, C. G., Yang, L. V., Riedinger, M., Au, M., and Witte, O. N. (2004). T cell chemotaxis to lysophosphatidylcholine through the G2A receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 245–250. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2536801100
Reichert, M., Steinbach, J. P., Supra, P., and Weller, M. (2002). Modulation of growth and radiochemosensitivity of human malignant glioma cells by acidosis. Cancer 95, 1113–1119. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10767
Ren, J., and Zhang, L. (2011). Effects of ovarian cancer G protein coupled receptor 1 on the proliferation, migration, and adhesion of human ovarian cancer cells. Chin. Med. J. 124, 1327–1332. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2011.09.010
Rofstad, E. K., Mathiesen, B., Kindem, K., and Galappathi, K. (2006). Acidic extracellular pH promotes experimental metastasis of human melanoma cells in athymic nude mice. Cancer Res. 66, 6699–6707. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0983
Rozhin, J., Sameni, M., Ziegler, G., and Sloane, B. F. (1994). Pericellular pH affects distribution and secretion of cathepsin B in malignant cells. Cancer Res. 54, 6517–6525.
Russell, J. L., Goetsch, S. C., Aguilar, H. R., Coe, H., Luo, X., Liu, N., et al. (2012). Regulated expression of pH sensing G Protein-coupled receptor-68 identified through chemical biology defines a new drug target for ischemic heart disease. ACS Chem. Biol. 7, 1077–1083. doi: 10.1021/cb300001m
Ryder, C., Mccoll, K., Zhong, F., and Distelhorst, C. W. (2012). Acidosis promotes Bcl-2 family-mediated evasion of apoptosis: involvement of acid-sensing G protein-coupled receptor Gpr65 signaling to Mek/Erk. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 27863–27875. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.384685
Saxena, H., Deshpande, D. A., Tiegs, B. C., Yan, H., Battafarano, R. J., Burrows, W. M., et al. (2012). The GPCR OGR1 (GPR68) mediates diverse signalling and contraction of airway smooth muscle in response to small reductions in extracellular pH. Br. J. Pharmacol. 166, 981–990. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01807.x
Seuwen, K., Ludwig, M. G., and Wolf, R. M. (2006). Receptors for protons or lipid messengers or both? J. Recept. Signal Transduct. Res. 26, 599–610. doi: 10.1080/10799890600932220
Shi, Q., Le, X., Wang, B., Abbruzzese, J. L., Xiong, Q., He, Y., et al. (2001). Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression by acidosis in human cancer cells. Oncogene 20, 3751–3756. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204500
Sin, W. C., Zhang, Y., Zhong, W., Adhikarakunnathu, S., Powers, S., Hoey, T., et al. (2004). G protein-coupled receptors GPR4 and TDAG8 are oncogenic and overexpressed in human cancers. Oncogene 23, 6299–6303. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207838
Singh, L. S., Berk, M., Oates, R., Zhao, Z., Tan, H., Jiang, Y., et al. (2007). Ovarian cancer G protein-coupled receptor 1, a new metastasis suppressor gene in prostate cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 99, 1313–1327. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm107
Smallbone, K., Maini, P. K., and Gatenby, R. A. (2010). Episodic, transient systemic acidosis delays evolution of the malignant phenotype: possible mechanism for cancer prevention by increased physical activity. Biol. Direct 5, 22. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-5-22
Steen, K. H., Reeh, P. W., Anton, F., and Handwerker, H. O. (1992). Protons selectively induce lasting excitation and sensitization to mechanical stimulation of nociceptors in rat skin, in vitro. J. Neurosci. 12, 86–95.
Sun, X., Yang, L. V., Tiegs, B. C., Arend, L. J., Mcgraw, D. W., Penn, R. B., et al. (2010). Deletion of the pH sensor GPR4 decreases renal acid excretion. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 21, 1745–1755. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2009050477
Swietach, P., Hulikova, A., Vaughan-Jones, R. D., and Harris, A. L. (2010). New insights into the physiological role of carbonic anhydrase IX in tumour pH regulation. Oncogene 29, 6509–6521. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.455
Tannock, I. F., and Rotin, D. (1989). Acid pH in tumors and its potential for therapeutic exploitation. Cancer Res. 49, 4373–4384.
Taracido, I. C., Harrington, E. M., Hersperger, R., Lattmann, R., Miltz, W., and Weigand, K. (2009). Imidazo pyridine derivatives. United States patent application 12/468,706, 1–50.
Tobo, M., Tomura, H., Mogi, C., Wang, J. Q., Liu, J. P., Komachi, M., et al. (2007). Previously postulated “ligand-independent” signaling of GPR4 is mediated through proton-sensing mechanisms. Cell. Signal. 19, 1745–1753. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2007.03.009
Tomura, H., Wang, J. Q., Komachi, M., Damirin, A., Mogi, C., Tobo, M., et al. (2005). Prostaglandin I(2) production and cAMP accumulation in response to acidic extracellular pH through OGR1 in human aortic smooth muscle cells. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 34458–34464. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M505287200
Tosa, N., Murakami, M., Jia, W. Y., Yokoyama, M., Masunaga, T., Iwabuchi, C., et al. (2003). Critical function of T cell death-associated gene 8 in glucocorticoid-induced thymocyte apoptosis. Int. Immunol. 15, 741–749. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxg070
Van Zwieten, R., Wever, R., Hamers, M. N., Weening, R. S., and Roos, D. (1981). Extracellular proton release by stimulated neutrophils. J. Clin. Invest. 68, 310–313. doi: 10.1172/JCI110250
Vaupel, P., Kallinowski, F., and Okunieff, P. (1989). Blood flow, oxygen and nutrient supply, and metabolic microenvironment of human tumors: a review. Cancer Res. 49, 6449–6465.
Vavere, A. L., Biddlecombe, G. B., Spees, W. M., Garbow, J. R., Wijesinghe, D., Andreev, O. A., et al. (2009). A novel technology for the imaging of acidic prostate tumors by positron emission tomography. Cancer Res. 69, 4510–4516. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3781
Walenta, S., Wetterling, M., Lehrke, M., Schwickert, G., Sundfor, K., Rofstad, E. K., et al. (2000). High lactate levels predict likelihood of metastases, tumor recurrence, and restricted patient survival in human cervical cancers. Cancer Res. 60, 916–921.
Wang, J. Q., Kon, J., Mogi, C., Tobo, M., Damirin, A., Sato, K., et al. (2004). TDAG8 is a proton-sensing and psychosine-sensitive G-protein-coupled receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 45626–45633. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M406966200
Warburg, O. (1956). On the origin of cancer cells. Science 123, 309–314. doi: 10.1126/science.123.3191.309
Webb, B. A., Chimenti, M., Jacobson, M. P., and Barber, D. L. (2011). Dysregulated pH: a perfect storm for cancer progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11, 671–677. doi: 10.1038/nrc3110
Weng, Z., Fluckiger, A. C., Nisitani, S., Wahl, M. I., Le, L. Q., Hunter, C. A., et al. (1998). A DNA damage and stress inducible G protein-coupled receptor blocks cells in G2/M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 12334–12339. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.21.12334
Williams, A. C., Collard, T. J., and Paraskeva, C. (1999). An acidic environment leads to p53 dependent induction of apoptosis in human adenoma and carcinoma cell lines: implications for clonal selection during colorectal carcinogenesis. Oncogene 18, 3199–3204. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202660
Wojtkowiak, J. W., Rothberg, J. M., Kumar, V., Schramm, K. J., Haller, E., Proemsey, J. B., et al. (2012). Chronic autophagy is a cellular adaptation to tumor acidic pH microenvironments. Cancer Res. 72, 3938–3947. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3881
Wyder, L., Suply, T., Ricoux, B., Billy, E., Schnell, C., Baumgarten, B. U., et al. (2011). Reduced pathological angiogenesis and tumor growth in mice lacking GPR4, a proton sensing receptor. Angiogenesis 14, 533–544. doi: 10.1007/s10456-011-9238-9
Xiao, H., Li, T. K., Yang, J. M., and Liu, L. F. (2003). Acidic pH induces topoisomerase II-mediated DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 5205–5210. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0935978100
Yan, L., Singh, L. S., Zhang, L., and Xu, Y. (2012). Role of OGR1 in myeloid-derived cells in prostate cancer. Oncogene. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.566. [Epub ahead of print].
Yang, L. V., Castellone, R. D., and Dong, L. (2012). “Targeting tumor microenvironments for cancer prevention and therapy,” in Cancer Prevention—From Mechanisms to Translational Benefits ed A. G. Georgakilas (Rijeka: InTech), 3–40. doi: 10.5772/28692
Yang, L. V., Radu, C. G., Roy, M., Lee, S., Mclaughlin, J., Teitell, M. A., et al. (2007). Vascular abnormalities in mice deficient for the G protein-coupled receptor GPR4 that functions as a pH sensor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 1334–1347. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01909-06
Yang, L. V., Radu, C. G., Wang, L., Riedinger, M., and Witte, O. N. (2005). Gi-independent macrophage chemotaxis to lysophosphatidylcholine via the immunoregulatory GPCR G2A. Blood 105, 1127–1134. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-05-1916
Zanke, B. W., Lee, C., Arab, S., and Tannock, I. F. (1998). Death of tumor cells after intracellular acidification is dependent on stress-activated protein kinases (SAPK/JNK) pathway activation and cannot be inhibited by Bcl-2 expression or interleukin 1beta-converting enzyme inhibition. Cancer Res. 58, 2801–2808.
Zhang, L., Li, P., Hsu, T., Aguilar, H. R., Frantz, D. E., Schneider, J. W., et al. (2011). Small-molecule blocks malignant astrocyte proliferation and induces neuronal gene expression. Differentiation 81, 233–242. doi: 10.1016/j.diff.2011.02.005
Zhang, Y., Feng, Y., Justus, C. R., Jiang, W., Li, Z., Lu, J. Q., et al. (2012). Comparative study of 3D morphology and functions on genetically engineered mouse melanoma cells. Integr. Biol. (Camb). 4, 1428–1436. doi: 10.1039/c2ib20153d
Keywords: cancer, tumor microenvironment, acidosis, proton-sensing G protein-coupled receptors, GPR4, GPR65 (TDAG8), GPR68 (OGR1), GPR132 (G2A)
Citation: Justus CR, Dong L and Yang LV (2013) Acidic tumor microenvironment and pH-sensing G protein-coupled receptors. Front. Physiol. 4:354. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00354
Received: 01 October 2013; Paper pending published: 25 October 2013;
Accepted: 19 November 2013; Published online: 05 December 2013.
Edited by:
Ebbe Boedtkjer, Aarhus University, DenmarkReviewed by:
Klaus Seuwen, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, SwitzerlandRaymond B. Penn, Thomas Jefferson University, USA
Copyright © 2013 Justus, Dong and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Li V. Yang, Department of Oncology at Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, 600 Moye Blvd., Greenville, NC 27834, USA e-mail: yangl@ecu.edu